Page last updated: 2024-10-29

avapro and Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

avapro has been researched along with Ventricular Dysfunction, Left in 10 studies

Irbesartan: A spiro compound, biphenyl and tetrazole derivative that acts as an angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist. It is used in the management of HYPERTENSION, and in the treatment of kidney disease.
irbesartan : A biphenylyltetrazole that is an angiotensin II receptor antagonist used mainly for the treatment of hypertension.

Ventricular Dysfunction, Left: A condition in which the LEFT VENTRICLE of the heart was functionally impaired. This condition usually leads to HEART FAILURE; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; and other cardiovascular complications. Diagnosis is made by measuring the diminished ejection fraction and a depressed level of motility of the left ventricular wall.

Research Excerpts

ExcerptRelevanceReference
"The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of canagliflozin (CANA) on ventricular remodeling in patients with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) heart failure and to further investigate its possible molecular mechanisms."8.31Canagliflozin Ameliorates Ventricular Remodeling through Apelin/Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 Signaling in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction Rats. ( Guo, Y; He, L; Ma, S; Wang, X; Wang, Y; Wang, Z; Zhai, J; Zhang, G; Zhang, T; Zuo, Q, 2023)
"Participants in the Atrial Fibrillation Clopidogrel Trial With Irbesartan for Prevention of Vascular Events (ACTIVE) trials with HF, but not randomized to oral anticoagulation, were categorized as having preserved versus reduced ejection fraction."5.20Relationship between degree of left ventricular dysfunction, symptom status, and risk of embolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure. ( Connolly, SJ; Hart, RG; Healey, JS; Hohnloser, SH; McAlister, FA; Pfeffer, MA; Sandhu, RK; Yuan, F; Yusuf, S, 2015)
"The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of canagliflozin (CANA) on ventricular remodeling in patients with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) heart failure and to further investigate its possible molecular mechanisms."4.31Canagliflozin Ameliorates Ventricular Remodeling through Apelin/Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 Signaling in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction Rats. ( Guo, Y; He, L; Ma, S; Wang, X; Wang, Y; Wang, Z; Zhai, J; Zhang, G; Zhang, T; Zuo, Q, 2023)
"Patient data were pooled from the CHARM-Preserved (Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity), I-PRESERVE (Irbesartan in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction), and TOPCAT (Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone Antagonist trial) studies and were examined for the association between having a pacemaker and the risk of the primary composite of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization, the individual components of the composite, the 2 main modes of cardiovascular death (i."3.91Prior Pacemaker Implantation and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction. ( Anand, IS; Carson, PE; Desai, AS; Docherty, KF; Granger, CB; Jhund, PS; Komajda, M; McKelvie, RS; McMurray, JJV; Petrie, MC; Pfeffer, MA; Shen, L; Solomon, SD; Swedberg, K; Zile, MR, 2019)

Research

Studies (10)

TimeframeStudies, this research(%)All Research%
pre-19900 (0.00)18.7374
1990's0 (0.00)18.2507
2000's3 (30.00)29.6817
2010's6 (60.00)24.3611
2020's1 (10.00)2.80

Authors

AuthorsStudies
Zhang, T1
Wang, X1
Wang, Z1
Zhai, J1
He, L1
Wang, Y1
Zuo, Q1
Ma, S1
Zhang, G1
Guo, Y1
Shen, L1
Jhund, PS2
Docherty, KF1
Petrie, MC1
Anand, IS2
Carson, PE2
Desai, AS1
Granger, CB1
Komajda, M2
McKelvie, RS2
Pfeffer, MA2
Solomon, SD1
Swedberg, K1
Zile, MR2
McMurray, JJV1
Böhm, M1
Perez, AC1
Reil, JC1
Massie, BM1
McMurray, JJ1
Sandhu, RK1
Hohnloser, SH1
Yuan, F1
Hart, RG1
Yusuf, S1
Connolly, SJ1
McAlister, FA1
Healey, JS1
Watanabe, R1
Suzuki, J1
Wakayama, K1
Kumagai, H1
Ikeda, Y1
Akazawa, H1
Komuro, I1
Isobe, M1
Kataoka, N1
Nishida, K1
Kinoshita, K1
Sakamoto, T1
Nakatani, Y1
Tsujino, Y1
Mizumaki, K1
Inoue, H1
Kinugawa, K1
Oghlakian, GO1
Sipahi, I1
Fang, JC1
Falcão, LM1
Pinto, F1
Ravara, L1
van Zwieten, PA1
Malmqvist, K1
Kahan, T1
Edner, M1
Bergfeldt, L1
Yip, GW1
Wang, M1
Wang, T1
Chan, S1
Fung, JW1
Yeung, L1
Yip, T1
Lau, ST1
Lau, CP1
Tang, MO1
Yu, CM1
Sanderson, JE1

Clinical Trials (4)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
Irbesartan in Heart Failure With Preserved Systolic Function (I-Preserve)[NCT00095238]Phase 34,128 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-06-30Completed
Evaluation of Renal Sodium Excretion After Salt Loading in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction[NCT03837470]Early Phase 114 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-05-06Completed
Randomized, Double-blind Evaluation of the Effects of Irbesartan and Atenolol on Cardiovascular Structure and Function in Subjects With Hypertension and Left Ventricular Hypertrophy[NCT00389168]Phase 2/Phase 3115 participants (Actual)Interventional1995-04-30Completed
Endothelin Receptor Blockade in Heart Failure With Diastolic Dysfunction and Pulmonary Hypertension[NCT00820352]Phase 320 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-01-31Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

Change From Baseline in B-Type Natriuretic Peptide (Pro-BNP) at Month 6 and Month 14

Adjusted ratio to baseline in geometric mean in Pro-BNP in the blood. Ratio to Baseline = On-therapy geometric mean divided by baseline geometric mean. A lower score signifies improvement. Change from baseline adjusted for baseline value and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor use at baseline. Analysis uses natural logarithms of excretion rate values. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6, Month 14

Interventionpg/mL (Geometric Mean)
Placebo - Month 60.98
Irbesartan - Month 60.93
Placebo - Month 141.00
Irbesartan - Month 141.01

Change From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final Visit

NYHA functional classification=4-tiered system relating symptoms to everyday activities & quality of life. (See Reporting Groups for description of each class.) Change of NYHA functional class from baseline was grouped into 3 categories: improved, unchanged, or worsened (based on case report form [CRF] assessment). If a post-randomization CRF assessment was missing or participant died, was hospitalized for worsening heart failure or discontinued study medication for worsening heart failure, the participant was classified as Major Event. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, Final Visit. The trial was designed to end after 1440 primary endpoint events, projected duration=6.0 ± 0.5 years.

,,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Month 6 - ImprovedMonth 6 - UnchangedMonth 6 - WorsenedMonth 6 - Major EventMonth 6 - No DataMonth 10 - ImprovedMonth 10 - UnchangedMonth 10 - WorsenedMonth 10 - Major EventMonth 10 - No DataMonth 14 - ImprovedMonth 14 - UnchangedMonth 14 - WorsenedMonth 14 - Major EventMonth 14 - No DataFinal Visit - ImprovedFinal Visit - UnchangedFinal Visit - WorsenedFinal Visit - Major EventFinal Visit - No Data
Irbesartan Baseline All Classes Combined9369664810107948911584110993386661751329286589732460
Irbesartan Baseline Class I or II5531041218442945310253828750222942230687511
Irbesartan Class III or IV88165678899046175318489557911531038864282924949
Placebo Baseline All Classes Combined88110165114989029397142106902890698011988269410732057
Placebo Baseline Class I or II47338472114231763914393126216164225478665
Placebo Class III or IV83467841287860622833928635787641038404402925452

Mean Change From Baseline in Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) at Month 6, Month 18, and Month 30

Based on the Cockcroft-Gault formula calculation, a commonly used surrogate marker to estimate creatinine clearance, which in turn is an approximate measure of GFR. It employs serum creatinine measurements and a patient's weight to predict the creatinine clearance. Adjusted for baseline GFR and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor use at baseline (ACE-I). A decrease from baseline signifies worsening. The adjusted mean change from baseline value is from the model (calculated prior to rounding), whereas the other two points are the baseline mean and post mean. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6, Month 18, Month 30

,,,,,
InterventionmL/min/1.73m2 (Mean)
Baseline MeanPost-Baseline MeanAdjusted Mean Change
Irbesartan - Month 1873.4968.00-5.50
Irbesartan - Month 3074.3767.05-7.12
Irbesartan - Month 673.1369.21-3.91
Placebo - Month 1873.5870.88-2.69
Placebo - Month 3073.3469.51-4.02
Placebo - Month 673.0271.97-1.07

Mean Change From Baseline in Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR)at Month 42, Month 54, Month 66

Based on the Cockcroft-Gault formula calculation, a commonly used surrogate marker to estimate creatinine clearance, which in turn is an approximate measure of GFR. It employs serum creatinine measurements and a patient's weight to predict the creatinine clearance. Adjusted for baseline GFR and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor use at baseline (ACE-I). A decrease from baseline signifies worsening. The adjusted mean change from baseline value is from the model (calculated prior to rounding), whereas the other two points are the baseline mean and post mean. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 42, Month 54, Month 66

,,,,,
InterventionmL/min/1.73m2 (Mean)
Baseline MeanPost-Baseline MeanAdjusted Mean Change
Irbesartan - Month 4274.9567.48-7.36
Irbesartan - Month 5475.1768.24-6.93
Irbesartan - Month 6671.8464.85-5.46
Placebo - Month 4274.3771.34-3.14
Placebo - Month 5475.2972.65-2.63
Placebo - Month 6663.4760.09-4.91

Minnesota Living With Heart Failure (MLwHF) Total Score (Sum of Questions 1-21) at Final Visit

Mean score at baseline and final visit in Minnesota Living with Heart Failure (MLWHF) questionnaire, a 21-item, patient-reported, 6-point (ranging from 0-5; higher score=poorer quality of life; highest possible score=105) measurement of quality of life in persons with heart failure. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Baseline, Final Visit=last scheduled visit specified in the protocol at conclusion of the entire study by the sponsor. The trial was designed to end after 1440 primary endpoint events, projected duration=6.0 ± 0.5 years.

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline MeanFinal Visit Mean
Irbesartan - Final Visit38.938.3
Placebo - Final Visit42.542.6

Minnesota Living With Heart Failure (MLwHF) Total Score (Sum of Questions 1-21) at Month 6 and Month 14

Mean score and adjusted mean change from baseline in Minnesota Living with Heart Failure (MLWHF) questionnaire, a 21-item, patient-reported, 6-point (ranging from 0-5; higher score=poorer quality of life; highest possible score=105) measurement of quality of life in persons with heart failure. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6, Month 14

,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline Mean ScoreMean Score at TimepointAdjusted Mean Change from Baseline
Irbesartan - Month 1442.832.1-10.6
Irbesartan - Month 643.033.2-9.8
Placebo - Month 1442.731.6-11.2
Placebo - Month 642.732.9-10.0

Number of Participants With New Onset Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Among Those With No Prior AF History or Evidence of AF on Baseline Electrocardiograph (ECG)

Frequency of new onset AF in participants with no prior AF history or evidence of AF on baseline ECG. Stratified by use of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and measured by adverse events reporting and final ECG recording read by the investigator. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Baseline, Final Visit

,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
No prior AF history or Evidence on Baseline ECGParticipants with New Onset Atrial Fibrillation
Irbesartan + ACE-I Use36635
Irbesartan no ACE-I Use1089103
Placebo + ACE-I Use34429
Placebo no ACE-I Use110299

Participant Assessment of Dyspnea at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With Baseline

Assessments are directly based on the Case Report Form (CRF). If the post-randomization CRF assessment was missing and the subject died, was hospitalized for worsening heart failure, or discontinued study medication for worsening heart failure, the subject was considered as having a Major Event. Participants who are summarized under Major Events are categorized as Worsened Markedly. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6, Month 14, Final Visit. The trial was designed to end after 1440 primary endpoint events, projected duration=6.0 ± 0.5 years.

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Month 6 - Improved MarkedlyMonth 6 - Improved ModeratelyMonth 6 - Improved SlightlyMonth 6 - UnchangedMonth 6 - Worsened SlightlyMonth 6 - Worsened ModeratelyMonth 6 - Worsened MarkedlyMonth 6 - Major EventMonth 6 - No DataMonth 14 - Improved MarkedlyMonth 14 - Improved ModeratelyMonth 14 - Improved SlightlyMonth 14 - UnchangedMonth 14 - Worsened SlightlyMonth 14 - Worsened ModeratelyMonth 14 - Worsened MarkedlyMonth 14 - Major EventMonth 14 - No DataFinal Visit - Improved MarkedlyFinal Visit - Improved ModeratelyFinal Visit - Improved SlightlyFinal Visit - UnchangedFinal Visit - Worsened SlightlyFinal Visit - Worsened ModeratelyFinal Visit - Worsened MarkedlyFinal Visit - Major EventFinal Visit - No Data
Irbesartan255549512508832298121247519460476103281368153213382328460114643539576
Placebo276536501510832210711623253143050990391074146212339335461145753238478

Participant Assessment of Fatigue at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With Baseline

Assessments are directly based on the Case Report Form (CRF). If the post-randomization CRF assessment was missing and the subject died, was hospitalized for worsening heart failure, or discontinued study medication for worsening heart failure, the subject was considered as having a Major Event. Participants who are summarized under Major Events are categorized as Worsened Markedly. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6, Month 14, Final Visit. The trial was designed to end after 1440 primary endpoint events, projected duration=6.0 ± 0.5 years.

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Month 6 - Improved MarkedlyMonth 6 - Improved ModeratelyMonth 6 - Improved SlightlyMonth 6 - UnchangedMonth 6 - Worsened SlightlyMonth 6 - Worsened ModeratelyMonth 6 - Worsened MarkedlyMonth 6 - Major EventMonth 6 - No DataMonth 14 - Improved MarkedlyMonth 14 - Improved ModeratelyMonth 14 - Improved SlightlyMonth 14 - UnchangedMonth 14 - Worsened SlightlyMonth 14 - Worsened ModeratelyMonth 14 - Worsened MarkedlyMonth 14 - Major EventMonth 14 - No DataFinal Visit - Improved MarkedlyFinal Visit - Improved ModeratelyFinal Visit - Improved SlightlyFinal Visit - UnchangedFinal Visit - Worsened SlightlyFinal Visit - Worsened ModeratelyFinal Visit - Worsened MarkedlyFinal Visit - Major EventFinal Visit - No Data
Irbesartan1935235045799728138122195513439525115481168153157361319479166803439576
Placebo20051947159610138137116182489443559109431674146178300337477176904238378

Participant Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With Baseline

Assessments are directly based on the Case Report Form (CRF). If the post-randomization CRF assessment was missing and the subject died, was hospitalized for worsening heart failure, or discontinued study medication for worsening heart failure, the subject was considered as having a Major Event. Participants who are summarized under Major Events are categorized as Worsened Markedly. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6, Month 14, Final Visit. The trial was designed to end after 1440 primary endpoint events, projected duration=6.0 ± 0.5 years.

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Month 6 - Improved MarkedlyMonth 6 - Improved ModeratelyMonth 6 - Improved SlightlyMonth 6 - UnchangedMonth 6 - Worsened SlightlyMonth 6 - Worsened ModeratelyMonth 6 - Worsened MarkedlyMonth 6 - Major EventMonth 6 - No DataMonth 14 - Improved MarkedlyMonth 14 - Improved ModeratelyMonth 14 - Improved SlightlyMonth 14 - UnchangedMonth 14 - Worsened SlightlyMonth 14 - Worsened ModeratelyMonth 14 - Worsened MarkedlyMonth 14 - Major EventMonth 14 - No DataFinal Visit - Improved MarkedlyFinal Visit - Improved ModeratelyFinal Visit - Improved SlightlyFinal Visit - UnchangedFinal Visit - Worsened SlightlyFinal Visit - Worsened ModeratelyFinal Visit - Worsened MarkedlyFinal Visit - Major EventFinal Event - No Data
Irbesartan2355525295376313881222345324615037830868153207378332480121522539676
Placebo2305635195296920871162065344505278235774146201339352495109762838378

Percentage of Participants Experiencing All-cause Death at Given Time Points

Treatment comparisons for time to all-cause death (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Percentage at 1 YearPercentage at 2 YearsPercentage at 3 YearsPercentage at 4 YearsPercentage at 5 Years
Irbesartan4.18.112.817.925.0
Placebo3.88.613.818.523.6

Percentage of Participants Experiencing Cardiovascular Death at Given Timepoints

Treatment comparisons for time to cardiovascular death (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Percentage 1 YearPercentage 2 YearsPercentage 3 YearsPercentage at 4 YearsPercentage at 5 Years
Irbesartan3.36.29.613.018.0
Placebo3.06.510.013.117.1

Percentage of Participants Experiencing CV Death or CV Hospitalization at Given Timepoints

Treatment comparisons for time to CV death or CV hospitalization. Protocol-specified CV hospitalizations include hospitalizations ≥24 hrs or involve a calendar date change for a primary cause of worsening heart failure, unstable angina, myocardial infarction, ventricular dysrhythmia, atrial dysrhythmia or stroke that also requires intravenous or intramuscular therapy or a related procedure or significant augmentation of oral therapy. Protocol specified CV hospitalizations also include myocardial infarction or stroke occurring during any hospitalization. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Percentage at 1 YearPercentage at 2 YearsPercentage at 3 YearsPercentage at 4 YearsPercentage at 5 Years
Irbesartan11.619.224.230.035.0
Placebo11.420.025.830.935.8

Percentage of Participants Experiencing CV Death, Non-Fatal Myocardial Infarction (MI), or Non-Fatal Stroke at Given Timepoints

Treatment comparisons for time to cardiovascular death, non-fatal MI, or non-fatal stroke. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Percentage at 1 YearPercentage at 2 YearsPercentage at 3 YearsPercentage at 4 YearsPercentage at 5 Years
Irbesartan5.28.712.917.223.0
Placebo4.29.313.617.622.4

Percentage of Participants Experiencing Heart Failure Mortality or Heart Failure Hospitalization at Given Time Points

Treatment comparisons for time to heart failure mortality or heart failure hospitalization (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Percentage at 1 YearPercentage at 2 YearsPercentage at 3 YearsPercentage at 4 YearsPercentage at 5 Years
Irbesartan7.912.915.719.823.6
Placebo8.213.717.220.323.8

Percentage of Participants Experiencing Protocol-specified Cardiovascular (CV) Hospitalization at Given Timepoints

Treatment comparisons for time to protocol-specified CV hospitalization. Protocol-specified CV hospitalizations include hospitalizations ≥24 hrs or involve a calendar date change for a primary cause of worsening heart failure, unstable angina, myocardial infarction, ventricular dysrhythmia, atrial dysrhythmia or stroke that also requires intravenous or intramuscular therapy or a related procedure or significant augmentation of oral therapy. Protocol specified CV hospitalizations also include myocardial infarction or stroke occurring during any hospitalization. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Percentage at 1 YearPercentage at 2 YearsPercentage at 3 YearsPercentage at 4 YearsPercentage at 5 Years
Irbesartan9.716.320.524.828.5
Placebo9.817.121.725.929.0

Percentage of Participants With First Occurrence of the Composite Outcome of Death (All Cause) or Protocol-Specified Cardiovascular (CV) Hospitalization at Given Timepoints

Treatment comparisons for time to first occurrence of composite outcome of all-cause death (composite outcome of death) or protocol-specified CV hospitalization. Protocol-specified CV hospitalizations include those ≥24 hrs or involving a calendar date change for a primary cause of worsening heart failure, unstable angina, myocardial infarction, ventricular or atrial dysrhythmia, or stroke, that also require intravenous or intramuscular therapy or a related procedure or significant augmentation of oral therapy. In addition, MI or stroke during any hospitalization are included. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Percentage at 1 YearPercentage at 2 YearsPercentage at 3 YearsPercentage at 4 YearsPercentage at 5 Years
Irbesartan12.320.726.432.939.2
Placebo12.121.328.434.239.5

Percentage of Participants With New Onset of Diabetes Among Subjects With No Prior Diabetes History at Given Timepoints

Treatment comparisons for time to new onset of diabetes (from adverse event reporting) among subjects with no prior history of diabetes. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Percentage at 1 YearPercentage at 2 YearsPercentage at 3 YearsPercentage at 4 YearsPercentage at 5 Years
Irbesartan0.72.13.14.65.2
Placebo1.22.83.95.46.2

Physician Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With Baseline

This was an assessment of the change in overall physician opinion of change from baseline status. Assessments are directly based on the Case Report Form (CRF). If the post-randomization CRF assessment was missing and the subject died, was hospitalized for worsening heart failure, or discontinued study medication for worsening heart failure, the subject was considered as having a Major Event. Participants who are summarized under Major Events are categorized as Worsened Markedly. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6, Month 14, Final Visit. The trial was designed to end after 1440 primary endpoint events, projected duration=6.0 ± 0.5 years.

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Month 6 - Improved MarkedlyMonth 6 - Improved ModeratelyMonth 6 - Improved SlightlyMonth 6 - UnchangedMonth 6 - Worsened SlightlyMonth 6 - Worsened ModeratelyMonth 6 - Worsened MarkedlyMonth 6 - Major EventMonth 6 - No DataMonth 14 - Improved MarkedlyMonth 14 - Improved ModeratelyMonth 14 - Improved SlightlyMonth 14 - UnchangedMonth 14 - Worsened SlightlyMonth 14 - Worsened ModeratelyMonth 14 - Worsened MarkedlyMonth 14 - Major EventMonth 14 - No DataFinal Visit - Improved MarkedlyFinal Visit - Improved ModeratelyFinal Visit - Improved SlightlyFinal Visit - UnchangedFinal Visit - Worsened SlightlyFinal Visit - Worsened ModeratelyFinal Visit - Worsened MarkedlyFinal Visit - Major EventFinal Visit - No Data
Irbesartan2305625335286017081292145464425077221575185180430344477117412336491
Placebo1985755295415816481321955374355487319679169186367361504117562835092

Blood Pressure

Difference in Diastolic Blood Pressure. Repeated measures multivariable analysis of variance (MANOVA) at time points 0, 12, 24, and 48 weeks (NCT00389168)
Timeframe: Baseline to 48 weeks

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Atenolol-16.3
Irbesartan-18.8

Effects on Carotid Artery Wall Thickness

Changes in common carotid artery intima-media thickness, assessed by ultrasonography. (NCT00389168)
Timeframe: Baseline to 48 weeks

Interventionmm (Mean)
Atenolol0.03
Irbesartan-0.01

Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events

Safety was assessed by non-directed questions, and all observed and volunteered adverse events were recorded at each study visit. Serious adverse events were defined by, and reported according to the regulations of good clinical practice (GCP). none were considered related to the study medication. (NCT00389168)
Timeframe: Treatment period was baseline to 48 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Atenolol5
Irbesartan5

Changes in Left Ventricular Mass Index

Repeated measures multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) at time points 0, 12, 24, and 48 weeks. Data are presented as left ventricular mass in gram (g) indexed for body mass index (in m^2). (NCT00389168)
Timeframe: Baseline and 48 weeks

,
Interventiong/m^2 (Mean)
12 weeks24 weeks48 weeks
Atenolol-1-6-14
Irbesartan-9-14-26

Changes of Venous Plasma Angiotensin II as a Marker of the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System

Venous plasma concentrations of angiotensin II were measured in order to study the possible associations between the activity of the renin-angiotensin-aldosteone system and changes in left ventricular mass. Further analyses of other components of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and of other hormonal system (e.g. the sympathetic nervous system) have also been performed and published. Repeated measures MANOVA at time points 0, 12, 24, and 48 weeks. Data were log-transformed to avoid skewness before statistical evaluation. However, tabular data are given as mean values with 95% confidence to improve readability. (NCT00389168)
Timeframe: Baseline to 48 weeks

,
Interventionpmol/L (Mean)
Weel 12Week 24Week 48
Atenolol-1.0-0.8-0.2
Irbesartan3.03.310.0

Left Ventricular Diastolic Function Assessed by the E/A Ratio

Changes in left ventricular diastolic function from baseline to week 48 will be evaluated as the difference in E/A ratio. Conventional pulsed wave Doppler echocardiography was used for recordings of mitral inflow in. The peak of early (E) and late (A) mitral flow velocities were measured, and the E/A-ratio was calculated. Repeated measures MANOVA at time points 0, 12, 24, and 48 weeks. Some echocardiographic recordings at some time point may be of insufficient quality or missing, and the number of observations may not always correspond to the total number of participants at all time points. (NCT00389168)
Timeframe: Baseline to 48 weeks

,
Interventionratio (Mean)
Week 12Week 24Week 48
Atenolol0.180.160.13
Irbesartan0.100.040.10

Reviews

1 review available for avapro and Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

ArticleYear
Treatment of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: have we been pursuing the wrong paradigm?
    Mayo Clinic proceedings, 2011, Volume: 86, Issue:6

    Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme

2011

Trials

5 trials available for avapro and Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

ArticleYear
Relationship between heart rate and mortality and morbidity in the irbesartan patients with heart failure and preserved systolic function trial (I-Preserve).
    European journal of heart failure, 2014, Volume: 16, Issue:7

    Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Atria

2014
Relationship between degree of left ventricular dysfunction, symptom status, and risk of embolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure.
    Stroke, 2015, Volume: 46, Issue:3

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Biphenyl Compounds; Clopid

2015
BNP and ANP as diagnostic and predictive markers in heart failure with left ventricular systolic dysfunction.
    Journal of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system : JRAAS, 2004, Volume: 5, Issue:3

    Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Atrial Natr

2004
Cardiac repolarization and its relation to ventricular geometry and rate in reverse remodelling during antihypertensive therapy with irbesartan or atenolol: results from the SILVHIA study.
    Journal of human hypertension, 2007, Volume: 21, Issue:12

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antihypertensive Agents; Atenolol; Biphenyl Compounds; Diastole; Double-Blind Method; E

2007
The Hong Kong diastolic heart failure study: a randomised controlled trial of diuretics, irbesartan and ramipril on quality of life, exercise capacity, left ventricular global and regional function in heart failure with a normal ejection fraction.
    Heart (British Cardiac Society), 2008, Volume: 94, Issue:5

    Topics: Aged; Antihypertensive Agents; Biphenyl Compounds; Diuretics; Drug Therapy, Combination; Echocardiog

2008

Other Studies

4 other studies available for avapro and Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

ArticleYear
Canagliflozin Ameliorates Ventricular Remodeling through Apelin/Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 Signaling in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction Rats.
    Pharmacology, 2023, Volume: 108, Issue:5

    Topics: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2; Animals; Apelin; Canagliflozin; Fibrosis; Heart Failure; Humans; Ir

2023
Prior Pacemaker Implantation and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction.
    JACC. Heart failure, 2019, Volume: 7, Issue:5

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds

2019
Angiotensin II receptor blocker irbesartan attenuates cardiac dysfunction induced by myocardial infarction in the presence of renal failure.
    Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2016, Volume: 39, Issue:4

    Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Animals; Biphenyl Compounds; Heart; Irbesartan; Male; Myoca

2016
Effect of irbesartan on development of atrial fibrosis and atrial fibrillation in a canine atrial tachycardia model with left ventricular dysfunction, association with p53.
    Heart and vessels, 2016, Volume: 31, Issue:12

    Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Animals; Atrial Fibrillation; Atrial Remodeling; Biphenyl C

2016