avapro has been researched along with Cardiovascular Stroke in 43 studies
Irbesartan: A spiro compound, biphenyl and tetrazole derivative that acts as an angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist. It is used in the management of HYPERTENSION, and in the treatment of kidney disease.
irbesartan : A biphenylyltetrazole that is an angiotensin II receptor antagonist used mainly for the treatment of hypertension.
Excerpt | Relevance | Reference |
---|---|---|
"The Randomized Evaluation of Long-term anticoagulation therapY (RE-LY) study demonstrated a significant increase in myocardial infarction events with dabigatran compared with warfarin, provoking renewed interest in whether vitamin K antagonists are useful drugs for the prevention of myocardial infarction in high-risk patients with atrial fibrillation." | 8.86 | Does warfarin for stroke thromboprophylaxis protect against MI in atrial fibrillation patients? ( Lane, DA; Lip, GY, 2010) |
" We aimed to compare the risks of myocardial infarction (MI), heart failure (HF), and cerebrovascular disease with the use of valsartan, losartan, irbesartan, and telmisartan with different half-lives in a national claim-based retrospective cohort of patients aged ≥ 40 years with hypertension." | 8.31 | Risk of myocardial infarction, heart failure, and cerebrovascular disease with the use of valsartan, losartan, irbesartan, and telmisartan in patients. ( Jeong, HE; Kim, JS; Ko, H; Lim, MJ; Shin, JY; Yoo, YG, 2023) |
"The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of irbesartan, carvedilol, and irbesartan plus carvedilol on the expression of tissue factor (TF) and tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) mRNA and protein in rat myocardium after myocardial infarction (MI)." | 7.77 | Combined effects of irbesartan and carvedilol on expression of tissue factor and tissue factor pathway inhibitor in rats after myocardial infarction. ( Du, Y; Ge, Z; Liu, W; Yu, J; Zhao, J, 2011) |
"To investigate the effects of carvedilol, irbesartan and their combination on myocardial collagen network remodeling after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in rats." | 7.73 | [Experimental study of effect of carvedilol on myocardial collagen network remodeling after acute myocardial infarction in rats]. ( Bian, SY; Liu, HB; Wang, L; Yang, TS; Yang, X; Yi, J, 2005) |
"The authors pooled data from 3 trials-CHARM Preserved (Candesartan Cilexietil in Heart Failure Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and Morbidity), I-Preserve (Irbesartan in Heart Failure With Preserved Systolic Function), and the Americas region of TOPCAT (Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure With an Aldosterone Antagonist) (N = 8,916)-and examined whether MI before or following enrollment independently predicted CV death and heart failure (HF) hospitalization." | 5.34 | Myocardial Infarction in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Pooled Analysis of 3 Clinical Trials. ( Anand, IS; Carson, P; Claggett, BL; Cunningham, JW; Desai, AS; Jhund, PS; John, JE; Kober, L; Lewis, EF; McMurray, JJV; Pfeffer, MA; Pitt, B; Shah, SJ; Solomon, SD; Swedberg, K; Vaduganathan, M; Yusuf, S; Zile, MR, 2020) |
"The Randomized Evaluation of Long-term anticoagulation therapY (RE-LY) study demonstrated a significant increase in myocardial infarction events with dabigatran compared with warfarin, provoking renewed interest in whether vitamin K antagonists are useful drugs for the prevention of myocardial infarction in high-risk patients with atrial fibrillation." | 4.86 | Does warfarin for stroke thromboprophylaxis protect against MI in atrial fibrillation patients? ( Lane, DA; Lip, GY, 2010) |
" We aimed to compare the risks of myocardial infarction (MI), heart failure (HF), and cerebrovascular disease with the use of valsartan, losartan, irbesartan, and telmisartan with different half-lives in a national claim-based retrospective cohort of patients aged ≥ 40 years with hypertension." | 4.31 | Risk of myocardial infarction, heart failure, and cerebrovascular disease with the use of valsartan, losartan, irbesartan, and telmisartan in patients. ( Jeong, HE; Kim, JS; Ko, H; Lim, MJ; Shin, JY; Yoo, YG, 2023) |
"Compared with other angiotensin-receptor blockers, telmisartan and valsartan were both associated with a lower risk of admission to hospital for acute myocardial infarction, stroke or heart failure among older adults with diabetes and hypertension." | 3.79 | Comparative effectiveness of angiotensin-receptor blockers for preventing macrovascular disease in patients with diabetes: a population-based cohort study. ( Antoniou, T; Camacho, X; Gomes, T; Juurlink, DN; Mamdani, MM; Yao, Z, 2013) |
"The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of irbesartan, carvedilol, and irbesartan plus carvedilol on the expression of tissue factor (TF) and tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) mRNA and protein in rat myocardium after myocardial infarction (MI)." | 3.77 | Combined effects of irbesartan and carvedilol on expression of tissue factor and tissue factor pathway inhibitor in rats after myocardial infarction. ( Du, Y; Ge, Z; Liu, W; Yu, J; Zhao, J, 2011) |
"To investigate the effects of carvedilol, irbesartan and their combination on myocardial collagen network remodeling after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in rats." | 3.73 | [Experimental study of effect of carvedilol on myocardial collagen network remodeling after acute myocardial infarction in rats]. ( Bian, SY; Liu, HB; Wang, L; Yang, TS; Yang, X; Yi, J, 2005) |
"We assessed the effects of the surmountable angiotensin receptor blocker valsartan, and the insurmountable angiotensin receptor blocker irbesartan, on hemodynamics and left ventricular systolic and diastolic function (echocardiography/Doppler) in vivo and infarct size (triphenyl tetrazolium chloride method), and regional angiotensin II type 1 receptor and angiotensin II type 2 receptor expression (immunoblots) ex vivo, after anterior reperfused myocardial infarction in rats." | 3.72 | Upregulation of angiotensin II type 2 receptor and limitation of myocardial stunning by angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers during reperfused myocardial infarction in the rat. ( Jugdutt, BI; Menon, V, 2003) |
"The aim of the present study was to investigate whether the non-peptide angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor antagonist irbesartan (SR 47436, BMS 186295, 2-n-butyl-3 [2'-(1H-tetrazol-5-yl)-biphenyl-4-yl)methyl]-1,3-diaza-spiro [4,4]non-1-en-4-one) has myocardial protective effects during regional myocardial ischemia/reperfusion in vivo." | 3.70 | Influence of the angiotensin II AT1 receptor antagonist irbesartan on ischemia/reperfusion injury in the dog heart. ( Barthel, H; Gonzàlez, M; Obal, D; Preckel, B; Schlack, W; Thämer, V, 2000) |
"During the Irbesartan Diabetic Nephropathy Trial, 1,387 participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and nephropathy underwent serial electrocardiograms for the identification of Q-wave myocardial infarction (MI)." | 2.71 | Clinically unrecognized Q-wave myocardial infarction in patients with diabetes mellitus, systemic hypertension, and nephropathy. ( Aguilar, D; Berl, T; Gans, DJ; Goldhaber, SZ; Levey, AS; Lewis, EJ; Lewis, JB; Pfeffer, MA; Porush, JG; Rouleau, JL, 2004) |
"Wortmannin treatment increased apoptosis in the remote myocardium both at baseline and after MI, together with an activation of the PKC-δ/p38-MAPK-pathway." | 1.39 | Inhibition of anti-apoptotic signals by Wortmannin induces apoptosis in the remote myocardium after LAD ligation: evidence for a protein kinase C-δ-dependent pathway. ( Ebner, B; Jercke, M; Joachim, D; Schwarz, K; Simonis, G; Strasser, RH; Wessela, T; Wiedemann, S, 2013) |
"Post-MI hypertrophy was associated with substantial increases in the messenger RNA (mRNA) expression of atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), but no significant changes in SERCA or PLB levels." | 1.30 | Angiotensin type 1 receptor antagonism with irbesartan inhibits ventricular hypertrophy and improves diastolic function in the remodeling post-myocardial infarction ventricle. ( Ambrose, J; Giraud, GD; Greenberg, BH; Muldoon, L; Perkins, KD; Pribnow, DG, 1999) |
Timeframe | Studies, this research(%) | All Research% |
---|---|---|
pre-1990 | 0 (0.00) | 18.7374 |
1990's | 1 (2.33) | 18.2507 |
2000's | 28 (65.12) | 29.6817 |
2010's | 11 (25.58) | 24.3611 |
2020's | 3 (6.98) | 2.80 |
Authors | Studies |
---|---|
Yoo, YG | 1 |
Lim, MJ | 1 |
Kim, JS | 1 |
Jeong, HE | 1 |
Ko, H | 1 |
Shin, JY | 1 |
Cunningham, JW | 1 |
Vaduganathan, M | 1 |
Claggett, BL | 1 |
John, JE | 1 |
Desai, AS | 1 |
Lewis, EF | 1 |
Zile, MR | 1 |
Carson, P | 1 |
Jhund, PS | 1 |
Kober, L | 1 |
Pitt, B | 1 |
Shah, SJ | 1 |
Swedberg, K | 1 |
Anand, IS | 1 |
Yusuf, S | 2 |
McMurray, JJV | 1 |
Pfeffer, MA | 3 |
Solomon, SD | 1 |
Wang, GM | 1 |
Li, LJ | 1 |
Tang, WL | 1 |
Wright, JM | 1 |
Antoniou, T | 1 |
Camacho, X | 1 |
Yao, Z | 1 |
Gomes, T | 1 |
Juurlink, DN | 1 |
Mamdani, MM | 1 |
Sgarra, L | 1 |
Leo, V | 1 |
Addabbo, F | 1 |
Iacobazzi, D | 1 |
Carratù, MR | 1 |
Montagnani, M | 1 |
Potenza, MA | 1 |
Watanabe, R | 1 |
Suzuki, J | 1 |
Wakayama, K | 1 |
Kumagai, H | 1 |
Ikeda, Y | 1 |
Akazawa, H | 1 |
Komuro, I | 1 |
Isobe, M | 1 |
Kassiri, Z | 1 |
Zhong, J | 1 |
Guo, D | 1 |
Basu, R | 1 |
Wang, X | 1 |
Liu, PP | 1 |
Scholey, JW | 1 |
Penninger, JM | 1 |
Oudit, GY | 1 |
Lip, GY | 1 |
Lane, DA | 1 |
Beygui, F | 1 |
Silvain, J | 1 |
Pena, A | 1 |
Bellemain-Appaix, A | 1 |
Collet, JP | 1 |
Drexler, H | 1 |
Bhatt, D | 1 |
Vicaut, E | 1 |
Montalescot, G | 1 |
Tebbe, U | 1 |
Bramlage, P | 1 |
Lüders, S | 1 |
Cuneo, A | 1 |
Sistig, P | 1 |
de Haan, F | 1 |
Schmieder, R | 1 |
Böhm, M | 1 |
Paar, WD | 1 |
Schrader, J | 1 |
Yu, J | 1 |
Zhao, J | 1 |
Liu, W | 1 |
Ge, Z | 1 |
Du, Y | 1 |
Healey, JS | 1 |
Pogue, J | 1 |
Chrolavicius, S | 1 |
Flather, M | 1 |
Hart, RG | 1 |
Hohnloser, SH | 1 |
Joyner, CD | 1 |
Connolly, SJ | 1 |
Holtkamp, FA | 1 |
de Zeeuw, D | 1 |
de Graeff, PA | 1 |
Laverman, GD | 1 |
Berl, T | 2 |
Remuzzi, G | 1 |
Packham, D | 1 |
Lewis, JB | 2 |
Parving, HH | 1 |
Lambers Heerspink, HJ | 1 |
Wiedemann, S | 1 |
Wessela, T | 1 |
Schwarz, K | 1 |
Joachim, D | 1 |
Jercke, M | 1 |
Strasser, RH | 1 |
Ebner, B | 1 |
Simonis, G | 1 |
Wu, D | 1 |
Lin, X | 1 |
Bernloehr, C | 1 |
Hildebrandt, T | 1 |
Doods, H | 1 |
Walther, T | 2 |
Siems, WE | 1 |
Hauke, D | 1 |
Spillmann, F | 2 |
Dendorfer, A | 1 |
Krause, W | 1 |
Schultheiss, HP | 2 |
Tschöpe, C | 3 |
Frantz, S | 1 |
Fraccarollo, D | 2 |
Wagner, H | 1 |
Behr, TM | 1 |
Jung, P | 1 |
Angermann, CE | 1 |
Ertl, G | 2 |
Bauersachs, J | 2 |
Nguyen, QT | 1 |
Colombo, F | 1 |
Clement, R | 1 |
Gosselin, H | 1 |
Rouleau, JL | 2 |
Calderone, A | 2 |
Jasmin, JF | 1 |
Leung, TK | 1 |
Villeneuve, L | 1 |
Dupuis, J | 1 |
Pons, S | 1 |
Hagège, A | 1 |
Fornes, P | 1 |
Gervais, M | 1 |
Giudicelli, JF | 1 |
Richer, C | 1 |
Huang, YS | 1 |
Sun, JH | 1 |
Li, XZ | 1 |
Jugdutt, BI | 3 |
Menon, V | 2 |
Altmann, C | 1 |
Koch, M | 1 |
Westermann, D | 2 |
Dhayat, N | 1 |
Dhayat, S | 1 |
Bascands, JL | 1 |
Gera, L | 1 |
Hoffmann, S | 1 |
Lacour, C | 1 |
Roccon, A | 1 |
Galindo, G | 1 |
Canals, F | 1 |
Hogie, M | 1 |
Segondy, D | 1 |
Briand, D | 1 |
Roque, C | 1 |
Herbert, JM | 2 |
Nisato, D | 1 |
Aguilar, D | 1 |
Goldhaber, SZ | 1 |
Gans, DJ | 1 |
Levey, AS | 1 |
Porush, JG | 1 |
Lewis, EJ | 1 |
Sawicki, G | 1 |
Tepliakov, AT | 1 |
Stepacheva, TA | 1 |
Ivannikova, OA | 1 |
Pushnikova, EIu | 1 |
Kaliuzhin, VV | 1 |
Malakhovich, EV | 1 |
Makushkin, EV | 1 |
Zenevich, MV | 1 |
Dimopoulos-Xicki, L | 1 |
Haas, M | 1 |
Galuppo, P | 1 |
Schmidt, I | 1 |
Zhang, RY | 1 |
Huang, YL | 1 |
Sun, YH | 1 |
Liu, HB | 1 |
Bian, SY | 1 |
Yang, TS | 1 |
Wang, L | 1 |
Yi, J | 1 |
Yang, X | 1 |
Berthonneche, C | 1 |
Sulpice, T | 1 |
Tanguy, S | 1 |
O'Connor, S | 1 |
Janiak, P | 1 |
de Leiris, J | 1 |
Boucher, F | 1 |
Nearchou, NS | 1 |
Tsakiris, AK | 1 |
Lolaka, MD | 1 |
Karatzis, EN | 1 |
Tsiafoutis, IN | 1 |
Flessa, CD | 1 |
Bogiatzis, DT | 1 |
Zarcos, I | 1 |
Skoufas, PD | 1 |
Merkus, D | 2 |
Haitsma, DB | 1 |
Sorop, O | 2 |
Boomsma, F | 2 |
de Beer, VJ | 2 |
Lamers, JM | 2 |
Verdouw, PD | 1 |
Duncker, DJ | 2 |
Zhao, SJ | 1 |
Wu, CE | 1 |
Li, H | 1 |
Zhang, XG | 1 |
Liu, KS | 1 |
Xiao, WL | 1 |
Jiang, ZA | 1 |
Zhou, DC | 1 |
Meinertz, T | 1 |
Fliegner, D | 1 |
Riad, A | 1 |
Schubert, C | 1 |
Becher, E | 1 |
Fielitz, J | 1 |
Regitz-Zagrosek, V | 1 |
Pijnappels, DA | 1 |
Dekkers, DH | 1 |
Ambrose, J | 1 |
Pribnow, DG | 1 |
Giraud, GD | 1 |
Perkins, KD | 1 |
Muldoon, L | 1 |
Greenberg, BH | 1 |
Preckel, B | 1 |
Schlack, W | 1 |
Gonzàlez, M | 1 |
Obal, D | 1 |
Barthel, H | 1 |
Thämer, V | 1 |
Schuijt, MP | 1 |
Basdew, M | 1 |
van Veghel, R | 1 |
de Vries, R | 1 |
Saxena, PR | 1 |
Schoemaker, RG | 1 |
Danser, AH | 1 |
Parkhomenko, AN | 1 |
Irkin, OI | 1 |
Kushnir, SP | 1 |
Bryl, ZV | 1 |
Soliarik, O | 1 |
Shkliar, LV | 1 |
Trial | Phase | Enrollment | Study Type | Start Date | Status | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure With an Aldosterone Antagonist (TOPCAT)[NCT00094302] | Phase 3 | 3,445 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2006-08-31 | Completed | ||
ESCAPE-SHF: A Double-blind, Double-dummy, Randomized, Multicenter, Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Effects of Aliskiren, Ramipril and Combination Treatment on Plasma Concentration of Angiotensin II in Patients With Decompensated Systolic Heart Failur[NCT00923156] | Phase 2 | 123 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2009-05-31 | Completed | ||
An Eight-week, Randomized, Double-blind, Multi-center, Active-controlled, Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of an Aliskiren-based Regimen Compared to a Lisinopril-based Regimen in Patients With Uncomplicated Severe Hypertension[NCT00219050] | Phase 3 | 180 participants | Interventional | 2005-02-28 | Completed | ||
An Eight-week, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel Group, Multicenter, Dose Escalation Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Aliskiren Administered Alone and in Combination With Ramipril in Patients With Hypertension and Diabetes Mellitus[NCT00219089] | Phase 3 | 839 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2004-11-30 | Completed | ||
An 8-week, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Multicenter Study Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Aliskiren 75 mg, 150 mg, and 300 mg in Patients With at Least 65 Years of Age With Essential Hypertension, Using 24-hour ABPM, With Lisinopril 10 m[NCT00219167] | Phase 3 | 355 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2005-04-30 | Completed | ||
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel Group, Active-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Both Aliskiren Monotherapy and Aliskiren/Enalapril Combination Therapy Compared to Enalapril Monotherapy, on Morbidity and Mortality in[NCT00853658] | Phase 3 | 7,064 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2009-03-31 | Completed | ||
A Multicenter, Double-blind, Randomized, 52-week, Extension Study to Evaluate the Long Term Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of Aliskiren Compared to Enalapril in Pediatric Hypertensive Patients 6-17 Years of Age[NCT01151410] | Phase 3 | 208 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2010-08-31 | Completed | ||
A 54 Week, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Multicenter Study Evaluating the Long-term Gastrointestinal (GI) Safety and Tolerability of Aliskiren (300 mg) Compared to Ramipril (10 mg) in Patients With Essential Hypertension[NCT00631917] | Phase 4 | 774 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2008-02-29 | Completed | ||
Efficacy of Aliskiren Compared to Ramipril in the Treatment of Moderate Systolic Hypertensive Patients[NCT01042392] | Phase 4 | 506 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2009-11-30 | Completed | ||
A 36 Week Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel Group, Multi-center, Active-controlled, Optional Titration Study Comparing an Aliskiren-based Regimen to a Ramipril-based Regimen in Patients ≥ 65 Years Old With Systolic Essential Hypertension[NCT00368277] | Phase 3 | 901 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2006-09-30 | Completed | ||
An Eight Week, Double-blind, Randomized, Multicenter, Parallel Group, Active-controlled Study Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Aliskiren 300 mg, 150 mg and 75 mg to Ramipril 5 mg in Patients With Essential Hypertension[NCT00529451] | Phase 3 | 1,613 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2007-09-30 | Completed | ||
A Parallel Randomized Controlled Evaluation of Clopidogrel Plus Aspirin, With Factorial Evaluation of Irbesartan, for the Prevention of Vascular Events, in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation[NCT00249795] | Phase 3 | 9,016 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2003-06-30 | Completed | ||
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024] |
First incidence of aborted cardiac arrest (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | Events per 100 person-years (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 0.09 |
Spironolactone | 0.05 |
(NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | Events per 100 person-years (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 4.6 |
Spironolactone | 4.2 |
(NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | Events per 100 person-years (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 3.1 |
Spironolactone | 2.8 |
Hospitalization for MI, stroke or the management of heart failure, whichever occurred first (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | Events per 100 person-years (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 6.2 |
Spironolactone | 5.5 |
Average post-baseline Chloride, taking into consideration baseline Chloride, treatment group, the time between the post-baseline measures, and the correlation between repeated measures within an individual. (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | mEq/L (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 102.33 |
Spironolactone | 102.26 |
(NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | Events per 100 person-years (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 7.8 |
Spironolactone | 7.2 |
(NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | Events per 100 person-years (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 6.6 |
Spironolactone | 5.9 |
(NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | Events per 100 person-years (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 1.1 |
Spironolactone | 1.0 |
(NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | Events per 100 person-years (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 1.1 |
Spironolactone | 1.0 |
"Average post-baseline depression, taking into consideration baseline depression, treatment group, the time between the post-baseline measures, and the correlation between repeated measures within an individual.~The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) is a 10-item, self-administered instrument for screening, diagnosing, monitoring and measuring the severity of depression. Scores can range from 0-27, in which lower scores reflect better mental health status. The PH-Q was administered at the following study visits: baseline, month 12 and annually thereafter. Valid translations of this questionnaire were only available for subjects enrolled in the United States and Canada." (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 5.6 |
Spironolactone | 5.1 |
First incidence of a deterioration of renal function. The TOPCAT protocol defines deterioration of renal function as occurring if a subject has a serum creatinine value which is at least double the baseline value for that subject, and is also above the upper limit of normal (assumed to be 1.0 mg/dL for females and 1.2 mg/dL for males.) (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | Events per 100 person-years (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 2.2 |
Spironolactone | 3.2 |
First incidence of atrial fibrillation among subjects without a history of atrial fibrillation at baseline (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | Events per 100 person-years (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 1.4 |
Spironolactone | 1.4 |
Average post-baseline GFR, taking into consideration baseline GFR, treatment group, the time between the post-baseline measures, and the correlation between repeated measures within an individual. (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | mL/min/1.73m2 (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 67.50 |
Spironolactone | 65.20 |
First incidence of a hospitalization for any reason (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | Events per 100 person-years (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 20.0 |
Spironolactone | 18.8 |
First incidence of a hospitalization for the management of heart failure (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | Events per 100 person-years (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 4.6 |
Spironolactone | 3.8 |
First incidence of myocardial infarction (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | Events per 100 person-years (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 1.1 |
Spironolactone | 1.2 |
First incidence of new onset diabetes mellitus among subjects without a history of diabetes mellitus at baseline. (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | Events per 100 person-years (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 0.7 |
Spironolactone | 0.7 |
Average post-baseline Potassium, taking into consideration baseline Potassium, treatment group, the time between the post-baseline measures, and the correlation between repeated measures within an individual. (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | mEq/L (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 4.32 |
Spironolactone | 4.49 |
"Average post-baseline quality of life, taking into consideration baseline quality of life and treatment group.~The McMaster Overall Treatment Evaluation questionnaire is a self-administered 3-item instrument that measures a patient's perception of change in their health-related quality of life since the start of therapy. The questionnaire consists of a single question - Since treatment started, has there been any change in your activity limitation, symptoms and/or feelings related to your heart condition? Scores can range from -7 to +7, and higher scores reflect better health status. The questionnaire was administered at the following study visits: month 4 and month 12. Valid translations of this questionnaire were only available for subjects enrolled in the United States, Canada and Argentina." (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 1.2 |
Spironolactone | 1.2 |
"Average post-baseline quality of life, taking into consideration baseline quality of life, treatment group, the time between the post-baseline measures, and the correlation between repeated measures within an individual.~The EuroQOL visual analog scale (EQ5D) is a single-item, self-administered instrument that quantifies current health status. Scores can range from 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status. The EQ5D was administered at the following study visits: baseline, month 4, month 12 and annually thereafter." (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 65.9 |
Spironolactone | 66.4 |
"Average post-baseline quality of life, taking into consideration baseline quality of life, treatment group, the time between the post-baseline measures, and the correlation between repeated measures within an individual.~The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) is a 23-item, self-administered instrument that quantifies physical function, symptoms (frequency, severity and recent change), social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life. Scores are transformed to a range of 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status. The KCCQ was administered at the following study visits: baseline, month 4, month 12 and annually thereafter." (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 63.1 |
Spironolactone | 64.4 |
Average post-baseline serum creatinine, taking into consideration baseline serum creatinine, treatment group, the time between the post-baseline measures, and the correlation between repeated measures within an individual. (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | mg/dL (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 1.11 |
Spironolactone | 1.17 |
Average post-baseline Sodium, taking into consideration baseline Sodium, treatment group, the time between the post-baseline measures, and the correlation between repeated measures within an individual. (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | mEq/L (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 140.95 |
Spironolactone | 140.33 |
First incidence of stroke (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | Events per 100 person-years (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 1.1 |
Spironolactone | 1.0 |
(NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | Events per 100 person-years (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 8.3 |
Spironolactone | 6.8 |
Peripheral venous blood was collected after 30 minutes of rest in the sitting position for analysis of biomarkers. Geometric Mean Ratio to baseline at Week 12 for BNP was calculated at 0 hours pre-dose. (NCT00923156)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks (Day 84 period 2)
Intervention | ratio (Geometric Mean) |
---|---|
Aliskiren | 0.96 |
Ramipril | 0.84 |
Aliskiren Plus Ramipril | 0.78 |
Peripheral venous blood was collected after 30 minutes of rest in the sitting position for analysis of biomarkers. Geometric Mean Ratio to baseline at 12 weeks for PRC was calculated at 0 hour pre-dose. (NCT00923156)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks (84 days, period 2)
Intervention | ratio (Geometric Mean) |
---|---|
Aliskiren | 2.48 |
Ramipril | 0.96 |
Aliskiren Plus Ramipril | 4.67 |
24 hour urine collections were performed. Geometric Mean Ratio to baseline at Week 12 for Urinary aldosterone was calculated 24 hours post-dose. (NCT00923156)
Timeframe: Baseline,12 weeks (Day 84 period 2)
Intervention | ratio (Geometric Mean) |
---|---|
Aliskiren | 0.83 |
Ramipril | 0.96 |
Aliskiren Plus Ramipril | 0.87 |
Blood samples (2 mL) for the determination of aliskiren concentration in plasma were collected using an indwelling cannula inserted in a forearm vein. Samples were collected at week 12 (day 84): pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 24 hours post-dose. (NCT00923156)
Timeframe: 12 weeks
Intervention | hr*ng/mL (Mean) |
---|---|
Aliskiren | 3502 |
Blood samples (2 mL) for the determination of aliskiren concentration in plasma were collected using an indwelling cannula inserted in a forearm vein. Samples were collected at week 12 (day 84): pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 24 hours post-dose. (NCT00923156)
Timeframe: 12 weeks
Intervention | hr*ng/mL (Mean) |
---|---|
Aliskiren | 1707 |
Blood samples (2 mL) for the determination of aliskiren concentration in plasma were collected using an indwelling cannula inserted in a forearm vein. Samples were collected at week 12 (day 84): pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 24 hours post-dose. (NCT00923156)
Timeframe: 12 weeks
Intervention | hr*ng/mL (Mean) |
---|---|
Aliskiren | 3041 |
Blood samples (2 mL) for the determination of aliskiren concentration in plasma were collected using an indwelling cannula inserted in a forearm vein. Samples were collected at week 12 (day 84): pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 24 hours post-dose. (NCT00923156)
Timeframe: 12 weeks
Intervention | ng/mL (Mean) |
---|---|
Aliskiren | 257.2 |
Blood samples (2 mL) for the determination of aliskiren concentration in plasma were collected using an indwelling cannula inserted in a forearm vein. Samples were collected at week 12 (day 84): pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 24 hours post-dose. (NCT00923156)
Timeframe: 12 weeks
Intervention | hour (Mean) |
---|---|
Aliskiren | 31.02 |
Blood samples (2 mL) for the determination of aliskiren concentration in plasma were collected using an indwelling cannula inserted in a forearm vein. Samples were collected at week 12 (day 84): pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 24 hours post-dose. (NCT00923156)
Timeframe: 12 weeks
Intervention | Hour (Median) |
---|---|
Aliskiren | 1.50 |
Peripheral venous blood was collected after 30 minutes of rest in the sitting position for analysis of biomarkers. Geometric Mean Ratio to baseline at Week 12 for tPRA was calculated at 0 hour pre-dose, 3 hour and 24 hour post-dose. (NCT00923156)
Timeframe: Baseline,12 weeks (84 days, Period 2)
Intervention | ratio (Geometric Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
0 hour pre-dose (n=40,38,37) | 3 hour post-dose (n=40,38,38) | 24 hour post-dose (n=40,38,38) | |
Aliskiren | 0.14 | 0.07 | 0.12 |
Aliskiren Plus Ramipril | 0.25 | 0.15 | 0.16 |
Ramipril | 1.02 | 1.50 | 0.90 |
Peripheral venous blood was collected after 30 minutes of rest in the sitting position for analysis of biomarkers. Geometric mean ratio to baseline at Week 12 for Venous angiotensin II levels was calculated in patients with decompensated systolic heart failure (SHF) and left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40% at 0 hour pre-dose, 3 hours and 24 hours post-dose. (NCT00923156)
Timeframe: Baseline. 12 Weeks (Day 84, period 2)
Intervention | ratio (Geometric Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
0 Hour pre-dose (n=40, 38, 37) | 3 hour post-dose (n=40, 38, 38) | 24 hour post-dose (n=40, 38, 38) | |
Aliskiren | 0.91 | 0.38 | 0.79 |
Aliskiren Plus Ramipril | 0.66 | 0.38 | 0.64 |
Ramipril | 1.08 | 0.44 | 0.97 |
Number of patients - All-cause death. All-cause death is common in Heart Failure HF patients this measures how many patients had this event. (NCT00853658)
Timeframe: up to end of study (78 months)
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Combination Aliskiren / Enalapril | 595 |
Aliskiren | 654 |
Enalapril | 646 |
Change from baseline to Month 12 for the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) clinical summary score. KCCQ is a 23-item, self-administered instrument that quantifies physical function, symptoms (frequency, severity and recent change), social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life. KCCQ clinical summary score is a composite assessment of physical limitations and total symptom scores. Scores are transformed to a range of 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status. (NCT00853658)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 12
Intervention | KCCQ Score (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Combination Aliskiren / Enalapril | -5.04 |
Aliskiren | -6.03 |
Enalapril | -5.01 |
Number of participants that had first occurrence of the composite endpoint, which is defined as either CV death or HF hospitalization due to HF. (NCT00853658)
Timeframe: up to End of Study (78 months)
Intervention | participants (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Primary Composite | CV death | 1st HF Hospitalization | |
Aliskiren | 791 | 562 | 442 |
Combination Aliskiren / Enalapril | 770 | 512 | 430 |
Enalapril | 808 | 547 | 452 |
Sitting blood pressure was measured using a calibrated standard sphygmomanometer after the participants remained in sitting position for 5 minutes at clinic during the visit. The repeat sitting measurements were made at 2 to 3 minute intervals and the mean of three sSBP measurements were used as the average sitting office blood pressure for that visit. (NCT01151410)
Timeframe: Baseline - end of study (Week 52 or Last observation carried forward (LOCF)
Intervention | millimeter(s) of mercury (mmHg) (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Aliskiren | -7.63 |
Enalapril | -7.94 |
MAP was defined as the average arterial pressure during a single cardiac cycle. The MAP was measured as sum of diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and one third of difference between systolic blood pressure (SBP) and DBP i.e. MAP = DBP+1/3*(SBP--DBP). (NCT01151410)
Timeframe: Baseline to end of study (Week 52 or LOCF)
Intervention | mmHg (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Aliskiren | -5.15 |
Enalapril | -5.95 |
Sitting blood pressure was measured using a calibrated standard sphygmomanometer after the participants remained in sitting position for 5 minutes at clinic during the visit. The repeat sitting measurements were made at 2 to 3 minute intervals and the mean of three sDBP measurements were used as the average sitting office blood pressure for that visit. (NCT01151410)
Timeframe: Baseline - end of study (Week 52 or Last observation carried forward (LOCF)
Intervention | mmHg (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Aliskiren | -3.90 |
Enalapril | -4.94 |
The primary analysis variable was the occurrence of an abnormal colonoscopy finding (defined as hyper-plastic polyps, inflammatory polyps, adenomatous polyps or carcinoma) at or prior to the planned one year visit. The occurrence of colonic pathology was identified during colonoscopy and histopathologic examination of biopsy. The composite endpoint was evaluated after one year of treatment with an aliskiren-based regimen compared to a ramipril-based regimen. (NCT00631917)
Timeframe: 54 weeks
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Aliskiren | 25.5 |
Ramipril | 25.1 |
Maximum hyperplasia score at end of study across rectal and cecal mucosa biopsy specimens. Score of 0 is no change from baseline, the minimum possible score. Score > 0 is worsening from baseline in which the maximum possible score is 3. (NCT00631917)
Timeframe: 54 weeks
Intervention | participants (Number) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score = 0 | Score = 1 | Score = 2 | Score = 3 | Score is Missing | |
Aliskiren | 295 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Ramipril | 304 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
The mean sitting blood pressure control target is defined as less than 140/90 mmHg (or 130/80 mmHg for diabetic patients) (NCT00631917)
Timeframe: Weeks 8, 30 and End of Study (54 weeks)
Intervention | Percentage of Participants (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Week 8 | Week 30 | End of Study | |
Aliskiren | 50.8 | 60.2 | 65.0 |
Ramipril | 44.9 | 54.1 | 56.1 |
Assessment of the occurrence of the individual components (hyperplastic polyps, inflammatory polyps, adenomatous polyps or carcinomas) of the composite endpoint (colonic pathology) following one-year of treatment with an aliskiren-based regimen compared to a ramipril-based regimen. (NCT00631917)
Timeframe: 54 weeks
Intervention | Percentage of Participants (Number) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Hyperplastic polyps | Inflammatory polyps | Adenomatous polyps | Carcinoma | |
Aliskiren | 13.1 | 0.0 | 15.0 | 0.0 |
Ramipril | 10.2 | 0.3 | 17.3 | 0.0 |
During each colonoscopy procedure, random biopsy samples were taken from normal appearing mucosa in both the cecum and rectum in addition to obvious endoscopically atypical areas. The mucosal biopsy samples were evaluated for mucosal hyperplasia, dysplasia, and inflammation. Anything noted as a distinct visual abnormality from cecum to rectum such as ulcers, erythematous mucosa, or polyps, was photographed and biopsied for histopathology evaluation. Colonic lesions were categorized according to location in the colon, size, number, and morphology. (NCT00631917)
Timeframe: 54 weeks
Intervention | Percentage of Participants (Number) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Complete colonoscopy performed | Was cecum reached in procedure | Photos obtained | Took drug affecting bowel function | Took low dose aspirin during wk prior to procedure | Adequacy of bowel preparation - Optimal | Adequacy of bowel preparation - Suboptimal | Adequacy of bowel preparation - Inadequate | Colonoscopy prep given- PEG containing solution | Colonoscopy prep given - Other | Occurrence of colon polyps | Patients with polyps-Cecum/ascending | Patients with polyps-Transverse | Patients with polyps-Descending/sigmoid | Patients with polyps-Rectum | Mean number of polyps-Cecum/ascending | Mean number of polyps-Transverse | Mean number of polyps-Descending/sigmoid | Mean number of polyps-Rectum | Polyps were completely resected-Cecum/ascending | Polyps were completely resected-Transverse | Polyps were completely resected-Descending/sigmoid | Polyps were completely resected-Rectum | Photo taken for polyps-Cecum/ascending | Photo taken for polyps-Transverse | Photo taken for polyps-Descending/sigmoid | Photo taken for polyps-Rectum | Mucosal abnormalities for colitis | Patients with colitis-Cecum/ascending | Patients with colitis-Transverse | Patients with colitis-Descending/sigmoid | Patients with colitis-Rectum | Area of colitis biopsied-Cecum/ascending | Area of colitis biopsied-Transverse | Area of colitis biopsied-Descending/sigmoid | Area of colitis biopsied-Rectum | Area of colitis photographed-Cecum/ascending | Area of colitis photographed-Transverse | Area of colitis photographed-Descending/sigmoid | Area of colitis photographed-Rectum | Normal mucosal biopsies collected-Cecum | Normal mucosal biopsies collected-Rectum | Mean number of normal mucosal biopsies-Cecum | Mean number of normal mucosal biopsies-Rectum | Malignance for any biopsy samples-Yes | Malignance for any biopsy samples-No | Malignance for any biopsy samples-Missing | Inflammation for any biopsy samples-Yes | Inflammation for any biopsy samples-No | Inflammation for any biopsy samples-Missing | |
Aliskiren | 100 | 99.7 | 99.4 | 0.0 | 4.8 | 72.3 | 27.4 | 0.3 | 96.8 | 3.2 | 29.6 | 11.8 | 6.1 | 12.1 | 8.0 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 11.8 | 6.1 | 12.1 | 7.6 | 11.8 | 5.7 | 10.8 | 7.6 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 99.4 | 99.7 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 99.4 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 98.4 | 0.6 |
Ramipril | 100 | 100 | 99.7 | 0.6 | 5.2 | 73.5 | 25.5 | 0.9 | 97.2 | 2.8 | 26.5 | 11.4 | 5.2 | 11.7 | 6.5 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 11.1 | 4.9 | 11.7 | 6.5 | 11.1 | 4.6 | 10.5 | 6.2 | 1.5 | 0.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 99.7 | 99.7 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 98.8 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 98.8 | 0.6 |
The arm in which the highest sitting systolic blood pressure (SBP) was found at study entry was used for all subsequent readings. At each study visit, after leaving the patient to rest 5 minutes in a sitting position, the blood pressure (BP) was measured three times with an oscillometric device. The measurements were performed at 1-2 minute intervals. The mean BP was calculated from the 3 readings. The analysis of variance included treatment factor and baseline value of mean sitting DBP as covariable. (NCT01042392)
Timeframe: Baseline to 8 weeks
Intervention | mmHg (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Ramipril | -5.23 |
Aliskiren | -6.39 |
The arm in which the highest sitting systolic blood pressure (SBP) was found at study entry was used for all subsequent readings. At each study visit, after leaving the patient to rest 5 minutes in a sitting position, the blood pressure (BP) was measured three times with an oscillometric device. The measurements were performed at 1-2 minute intervals. The mean BP was calculated from the 3 readings. The analysis of covariance included treatment factor and baseline mean sitting SBP as covariable. (NCT01042392)
Timeframe: Baseline to 8 weeks
Intervention | mmHg (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Ramipril | -18.80 |
Aliskiren | -20.78 |
Ambulatory blood pressure measurement (ABPM) over 24 hours was performed for all patients on the eve of visit 4 (week 8), the device attached to the ambulatory blood pressure non-dominant arm of the patient. The difference between mean-hour maximum SBP mean-hour minimum SBP between 1 am and 8 am was measured. (NCT01042392)
Timeframe: At week 8
Intervention | mmHg (Mean) |
---|---|
Ramipril | 33.6 |
Aliskiren | 35.5 |
Ambulatory blood pressure measurement (ABPM) over 24 hours was performed for all patients on the day before visit 4, the device attached to the ambulatory blood pressure non-dominant arm of the patient. The BP morning surge was defined as the average of the measurements taken during the first 2 hours after waking the patient. The minimal night blood pressure was defined as the average of the two lowest BP measures (the lowest hourly average) recorded during night time. (NCT01042392)
Timeframe: After 8 weeks
Intervention | Participants (Number) |
---|---|
Ramipril | 3 |
Aliskiren | 9 |
"The sub-groups were: Riser = patients with >= 55 mmHg difference between the mean SPB measured at the morning surge and the mean minimal SBP measured during the night. The Non-risers in whom the difference is <55 mmHg. Patients called dippers in whom there was a decrease in average nocturnal SBP ≥ 10% compared with average daytime SBP, in contrast to patients non-dippers in whom this difference was <10%." (NCT01042392)
Timeframe: Baseline to 8 weeks
Intervention | mmHg (Mean) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Change in msSBP: Risers (n= 3, 9) | Change in msSBP: Non-risers (n=109, 103) | Change in msSBP: Dippers (n= 80, 94) | Change in msSBP: Non-dippers (n= 93, 92) | Change in msDBP: Risers (n= 3, 9) | Change in msDBP: Non-risers(n=109, 103) | Change in msDBP: Dippers (n= 80, 94) | Change in msDBP: Non-dippers (n= 93, 92) | |
Aliskiren | -16.9 | -20.5 | -19.8 | -21.1 | -6.6 | -5.7 | -6.3 | -6.5 |
Ramipril | -19.7 | -19.2 | -18.1 | -19.2 | -7.3 | -4.2 | -5.5 | -5.3 |
The change in blood pressure was measured between visit 4 (end of the period of double-blind active treatment which was at week 8) and visit 5 (48 hours after the last active dose taken) in the group of patients who received aliskiren or placebo and those who received ramipril or placebo. The analysis of covariance included treatment factor and baseline mean sitting SBP and mean sitting DBP as covariables. (NCT01042392)
Timeframe: From 8 weeks to 48 hours after week 8
Intervention | mmHg (Least Squares Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Change in msSBP | Change in msDBP | |
Aliskiren | 0.52 | -0.40 |
Placebo to Aliskiren | 3.27 | 0.97 |
Placebo to Ramipril | -1.28 | 0.32 |
Ramipril | -0.50 | 0.76 |
The arm in which the highest sitting systolic blood pressure (SBP) was found at study entry was used for all subsequent readings. At each study visit, after leaving the patient to rest 5 minutes in a sitting position, the blood pressure (BP) was measured three times with an oscillometric device. The measurements were performed at 1-2 minute intervals. The mean BP was calculated from the 3 readings. The analysis of covariance included treatment factor and baseline mean sitting SBP and mean sitting DBP as covariables. (NCT01042392)
Timeframe: Baseline to 4 weeks
Intervention | mmHg (Least Squares Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Change in msSBP | Change in msDBP | |
Aliskiren | -19.75 | -5.60 |
Ramipril | -19.42 | -5.37 |
Adverse events are defined as any unfavorable and unintended diagnosis, symptom, sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), syndrome or disease which either occurs during study, having been absent at baseline, or, if present at baseline, appears to worsen. Serious adverse events are any untoward medical occurrences that result in death, are life threatening, require (or prolong) hospitalization, cause persistent or significant disability/incapacity, result in congenital anomalies or birth defects, or are other conditions which in judgment of investigators represent significant hazards. (NCT01042392)
Timeframe: 8 weeks + 1 day
Intervention | Participants (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Patients with at least 1 AE | Patients with at least 1 SAE | Death | |
Aliskiren | 43 | 1 | 0 |
Ramipril | 55 | 3 | 0 |
"The arm in which the highest sitting systolic blood pressure (SBP) was found at study entry was used for all subsequent readings. At each study visit, after leaving the patient to rest 5 minutes in a sitting position, the blood pressure (BP) was measured three times with an oscillometric device. The measurements were performed at 1-2 minute intervals. The mean BP was calculated from the 3 readings.~Controlled blood pressure (BP) is defined as mean office systolic BP/ diastolic BP < 140/90 mmHg." (NCT01042392)
Timeframe: At 4 and 8 weeks
Intervention | Percentage (Number) | |
---|---|---|
At week 4 (N= 218, 217) | At week 8 (N= 213, 213) | |
Aliskiren | 40.1 | 32.4 |
Ramipril | 36.7 | 26.8 |
(NCT00368277)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12
Intervention | mm Hg (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Aliskiren Based Treatment Regimen | -13.96 |
Ramipril Based Treatment Regimen | -11.64 |
(NCT00368277)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 36
Intervention | mm Hg (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Aliskiren Based Treatment Regimen | -8.24 |
Ramipril Based Treatment Regimen | -7.02 |
Blood pressure control is defined as a mean sitting blood pressure < 140/90 mm Hg (NCT00368277)
Timeframe: Weeks 12 and 36
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) | |
---|---|---|
week 12 endpoint | week 36 endpoint | |
Aliskiren Based Treatment Regimen | 46.3 | 65.6 |
Ramipril Based Treatment Regimen | 39.3 | 57.5 |
(NCT00368277)
Timeframe: Weeks 12 and 36
Intervention | Percentage of Participants (Number) | |
---|---|---|
Week 12 | Week 36 | |
Aliskiren Based Treatment Regimen | 3.1 | 4.4 |
Ramipril Based Treatment Regimen | 9.9 | 14.2 |
To evaluate the percentage of patients controlled to a target blood pressure of < 140/90 mmHg on aliskiren 300 mg, 150 mg and 75 mg vs. ramipril 5 mg. (NCT00529451)
Timeframe: Week 8
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Aliskiren 300 mg | 52.29 |
Aliskiren 150 mg | 48.11 |
Aliskiren 75 mg | 45.68 |
Ramipril 5 mg | 43.65 |
To evaluate the percentage of responders on aliskiren 300 mg, 150 mg and 75 mg vs. ramipril 5 mg, defined as msDBP < 90 mmHg or ≥ 10mmHg decrease from baseline in msDBP. (NCT00529451)
Timeframe: Week 8
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Aliskiren 300 mg | 67.89 |
Aliskiren 150 mg | 59.75 |
Aliskiren 75 mg | 59.57 |
Ramipril 5 mg | 53.87 |
To evaluate the non-inferiority of aliskiren 300 mg to ramipril 5 mg in the change in Mean Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (msDBP) from baseline to 8 week endpoint (NCT00529451)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8
Intervention | mm Hg (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Aliskiren 150 mg | -10.04 |
Ramipril 5 mg | -9.19 |
To evaluate the non-inferiority of aliskiren 300 mg to ramipril 5 mg in the change in Mean Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (msDBP) from baseline to 8 week endpoint (NCT00529451)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8
Intervention | mm Hg (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Aliskiren 300 mg | -11.63 |
Ramipril 5 mg | -9.19 |
To evaluate the non-inferiority of aliskiren 75 mg to ramipril 5 mg in the change in Mean Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (msDBP) from baseline to 8 week endpoint (NCT00529451)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8
Intervention | mm Hg (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Aliskiren 75 mg | -10.66 |
Ramipril 5 mg | -9.19 |
To evaluate the change in Mean Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure (msSBP) and Mean Sitting Diastolic blood Pressure (msDBP) from baseline to 8 week endpoint on aliskiren 300 mg, 150 mg and 75 mg vs. ramipril 5 mg in patients with essential hypertension. (NCT00529451)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8
Intervention | mm Hg (Least Squares Mean) | |
---|---|---|
msSBP | msDBP | |
Aliskiren 150 mg | -12.16 | -10.04 |
Aliskiren 300 mg | -14.39 | -11.63 |
Aliskiren 75 mg | -12.24 | -10.66 |
Ramipril 5 mg | -11.46 | -9.19 |
The considered event is the death over the duration of the follow-up whatever the cause, cardiovascular or non-cardiovascular. (NCT00249795)
Timeframe: Median follow-up of 4.5 years
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Irbesartan | 949 |
Placebo | 929 |
The considered event is the first overnight hospital stay for HF over the duration of the follow-up, after validation by the EAC. (NCT00249795)
Timeframe: Median follow-up of 4.5 years
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Irbesartan | 482 |
Placebo | 551 |
The considered event is the overnight hospital stay for any CV cause other than Heart Failure over the duration of follow-up, as reported by the investigator (i.e. not validated by the Event Adjudication Committee). (NCT00249795)
Timeframe: Median follow-up of 4.5 years
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Irbesartan | 1186 |
Placebo | 1174 |
The considered event is the first occurence of any HF episode defined as evidence of signs and symptoms of HF with or without hospitalization over the duration of follow-up, as reported by the investigator (i.e. not validated by the Event Adjudication Committee). (NCT00249795)
Timeframe: Median follow-up of 4.5 years
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Irbesartan | 699 |
Placebo | 767 |
The considered event is the first occurrence of stroke (nonfatal or fatal, ischemic, hemorrhagic or of uncertain type) over the duration of follow-up, after validation by the EAC. (NCT00249795)
Timeframe: Median follow-up of 4.5 years
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Irbesartan | 379 |
Placebo | 411 |
The first co-primary event is the first occurence of any component of the following cluster over the duration of follow-up: myocardial infarction (nonfatal or fatal), stroke (nonfatal or fatal) or vascular death - after validation by the Event Adjudication Committee (EAC). (NCT00249795)
Timeframe: Median follow-up of 4.5 years
Intervention | participants (Number) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
All components | - Myocardial Infarction (fatal or not) | - Stroke (fatal or not) | - Vascular death | |
Irbesartan | 963 | 136 | 367 | 460 |
Placebo | 963 | 123 | 407 | 433 |
The second co-primary event is the first occurence of any component of the following cluster over the duration of follow-up: myocardial infarction (nonfatal or fatal), stroke (nonfatal or fatal), vascular death or hospitalization for heart failure - after validation by the EAC. (NCT00249795)
Timeframe: Median follow-up of 4.5 years
Intervention | participants (Number) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
All components | - Myocardial Infarction (fatal or not) | - Stroke (fatal or not) | - Vascular death | - Hospitalization for heart failure | |
Irbesartan | 1236 | 122 | 340 | 331 | 443 |
Placebo | 1291 | 112 | 375 | 291 | 513 |
3 reviews available for avapro and Cardiovascular Stroke
Article | Year |
---|---|
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Renin inhibitors versus angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension.
Topics: Aged; Amides; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Dise | 2020 |
Does warfarin for stroke thromboprophylaxis protect against MI in atrial fibrillation patients?
Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Azetidines; Benzimidazoles; Benzylamines; Biphenyl Compounds; D | 2010 |
Albuminuria and blood pressure, independent targets for cardioprotective therapy in patients with diabetes and nephropathy: a post hoc analysis of the combined RENAAL and IDNT trials.
Topics: Aged; Albuminuria; Amlodipine; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Blood Pressure; | 2011 |
8 trials available for avapro and Cardiovascular Stroke
Article | Year |
---|---|
Myocardial Infarction in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Pooled Analysis of 3 Clinical Trials.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Diuretics; Double | 2020 |
Usefulness of biomarker strategy to improve GRACE score's prediction performance in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome and low event rates.
Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Biomarker | 2010 |
Irbesartan in patients with atrial fibrillation.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Atrial Fibrillation; Biphenyl Compounds; Blood Pressu | 2011 |
[Effects of irbesartan on remodeling of the left ventricular following acute myocardial infarction].
Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Biphenyl Compounds; Heart Ventricles; Humans; Irbesartan; M | 2003 |
Clinically unrecognized Q-wave myocardial infarction in patients with diabetes mellitus, systemic hypertension, and nephropathy.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Biphenyl Compounds; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Angiopathies; Diabetic Nephropa | 2004 |
[Antihypertensive and antiischemic effectiveness and safety of the AT1-receptor blocker irbesartranin arterial hypertension in patients with prior myocardial infarction].
Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Antihypertensive Agents; Ateno | 2004 |
[Effects of irbesartan on left ventricular diasolic function and heart rate variability of patients with acute myocardial infarction].
Topics: Adult; Aged; Antihypertensive Agents; Biphenyl Compounds; Female; Heart Rate; Humans; Irbesartan; Ma | 2007 |
Additional effects of irbesartan when compared to captopril in the prevention of post-infarction left ventricular dilatation.
Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Biphenyl Compounds; Capt | 2002 |
32 other studies available for avapro and Cardiovascular Stroke
Article | Year |
---|---|
Risk of myocardial infarction, heart failure, and cerebrovascular disease with the use of valsartan, losartan, irbesartan, and telmisartan in patients.
Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl | 2023 |
Comparative effectiveness of angiotensin-receptor blockers for preventing macrovascular disease in patients with diabetes: a population-based cohort study.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Benzimidazoles; Benzoates; Biphenyl Compo | 2013 |
Intermittent losartan administration triggers cardiac post-conditioning in isolated rat hearts: role of BK2 receptors.
Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Animals; Biphenyl Compounds; Bradykinin; Cardiotonic Agents; Heart | 2014 |
Angiotensin II receptor blocker irbesartan attenuates cardiac dysfunction induced by myocardial infarction in the presence of renal failure.
Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Animals; Biphenyl Compounds; Heart; Irbesartan; Male; Myoca | 2016 |
Loss of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 accelerates maladaptive left ventricular remodeling in response to myocardial infarction.
Topics: Adaptation, Physiological; Angiotensin I; Angiotensin II; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; A | 2009 |
Follow-up of cardiovascular risk markers in hypertensive patients treated with irbesartan: results of the i-SEARCH Plus Registry.
Topics: Aged; Albuminuria; Antihypertensive Agents; Biomarkers; Biphenyl Compounds; C-Reactive Protein; Card | 2010 |
Combined effects of irbesartan and carvedilol on expression of tissue factor and tissue factor pathway inhibitor in rats after myocardial infarction.
Topics: Adrenergic Antagonists; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Animals; Biphenyl Compounds; Blood | 2011 |
Inhibition of anti-apoptotic signals by Wortmannin induces apoptosis in the remote myocardium after LAD ligation: evidence for a protein kinase C-δ-dependent pathway.
Topics: Androstadienes; Animals; Apoptosis; Atrial Natriuretic Factor; Benzophenanthridines; Biphenyl Compou | 2013 |
Effects of a novel bradykinin B1 receptor antagonist and angiotensin II receptor blockade on experimental myocardial infarction in rats.
Topics: Analysis of Variance; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Animals; Biphenyl Compounds; Blood Pressure; | 2012 |
AT1 receptor blockade increases cardiac bradykinin via neutral endopeptidase after induction of myocardial infarction in rats.
Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Animals; Biphenyl Compou | 2002 |
Sustained activation of nuclear factor kappa B and activator protein 1 in chronic heart failure.
Topics: Adult; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Animals; Biphenyl | 2003 |
AT1 receptor antagonist therapy preferentially ameliorated right ventricular function and phenotype during the early phase of remodeling post-MI.
Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Animals; Biphenyl Compounds; Irbesartan; Male; Myocardial I | 2003 |
Lung structural remodeling and pulmonary hypertension after myocardial infarction: complete reversal with irbesartan.
Topics: Actins; Angiotensin II Type 2 Receptor Blockers; Animals; Antigens, CD; Antigens, Differentiation, M | 2003 |
Effects of angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockade in ApoE-deficient mice with post-ischemic heart failure.
Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Animals; Apolipoproteins E; Arteriosclerosis; Biphenyl Comp | 2003 |
Upregulation of angiotensin II type 2 receptor and limitation of myocardial stunning by angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers during reperfused myocardial infarction in the rat.
Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin II Type 2 Receptor Blockers; Animals; Biphenyl | 2003 |
The bradykinin B1 receptor contributes to the cardioprotective effects of AT1 blockade after experimental myocardial infarction.
Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Animals; Biphenyl Compounds; Gene Expression; Irbesartan; M | 2004 |
Effects of differential blockade of the renin-angiotensin system in postinfarcted rats.
Topics: Aldosterone; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Anim | 2004 |
AT1 receptor blockade limits myocardial injury and upregulates AT2 receptors during reperfused myocardial infarction.
Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Animals; Biphenyl Compounds; Blood Pressure; Dogs; Heart Ra | 2004 |
AT1 receptor blockade alters metabolic, functional and structural proteins after reperfused myocardial infarction: detection using proteomics.
Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Animals; ATP Synthetase Complexes; Biphenyl Compounds; Crea | 2004 |
[Therapeutic implications of ACE-gene polymorphism].
Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive | 2005 |
Additive amelioration of left ventricular remodeling and molecular alterations by combined aldosterone and angiotensin receptor blockade after myocardial infarction.
Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Animals; Biphenyl Compounds; Blotting, Western; Collagen Ty | 2005 |
[Effects of combination therapy with angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibitor and angiotensin 1 receptor antagonist on ventricular remodeling and expression of endothelial nitric oxide synthase].
Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Animals; Biphenyl | 2005 |
[Experimental study of effect of carvedilol on myocardial collagen network remodeling after acute myocardial infarction in rats].
Topics: Animals; Biphenyl Compounds; Carbazoles; Carvedilol; Collagen; Disease Models, Animal; Hemodynamics; | 2005 |
AT1 receptor blockade prevents cardiac dysfunction after myocardial infarction in rats.
Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Animals; Biphenyl Compounds; Blood Pressure; Heart Rate; Ir | 2005 |
Influence of angiotensin II receptors blocking on overall left ventricle's performance of patients with acute myocardial infarction of limited extent. Echocardiographic assessment.
Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Biphenyl Compounds; Case-Control Studies; Chi-Square Distri | 2006 |
Coronary vasoconstrictor influence of angiotensin II is reduced in remodeled myocardium after myocardial infarction.
Topics: Angiotensin II; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Animals; Biphenyl Compounds; Body Weight; C | 2006 |
[Anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation. ACTIVE Study (Arterial fibrillation Clopidogrel Trial with Irbesartan for Prevention of Vascular Events)].
Topics: Administration, Oral; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Bipheny | 2007 |
Up-regulation of PPARgamma in myocardial infarction.
Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Animals; Biphenyl Compounds; Blood Pressure; CD36 Antigens; | 2008 |
Integrative control of coronary resistance vessel tone by endothelin and angiotensin II is altered in swine with a recent myocardial infarction.
Topics: Angiotensin II; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Animals; Biphenyl Compounds; Coronary Circu | 2008 |
Angiotensin type 1 receptor antagonism with irbesartan inhibits ventricular hypertrophy and improves diastolic function in the remodeling post-myocardial infarction ventricle.
Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Animals; Antihypertensive Agents; Atrial Natriuretic Factor; Biphe | 1999 |
Influence of the angiotensin II AT1 receptor antagonist irbesartan on ischemia/reperfusion injury in the dog heart.
Topics: Angiotensin II; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Animals; Biphenyl Compounds; Coronary Circulation; | 2000 |
AT(2) receptor-mediated vasodilation in the heart: effect of myocardial infarction.
Topics: Angiotensin II; Animals; Antihypertensive Agents; Biphenyl Compounds; Cardiac Output; Coronary Circu | 2001 |