avapro has been researched along with Cardiac Remodeling, Ventricular in 20 studies
Irbesartan: A spiro compound, biphenyl and tetrazole derivative that acts as an angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist. It is used in the management of HYPERTENSION, and in the treatment of kidney disease.
irbesartan : A biphenylyltetrazole that is an angiotensin II receptor antagonist used mainly for the treatment of hypertension.
Excerpt | Relevance | Reference |
---|---|---|
"The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of canagliflozin (CANA) on ventricular remodeling in patients with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) heart failure and to further investigate its possible molecular mechanisms." | 8.31 | Canagliflozin Ameliorates Ventricular Remodeling through Apelin/Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 Signaling in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction Rats. ( Guo, Y; He, L; Ma, S; Wang, X; Wang, Y; Wang, Z; Zhai, J; Zhang, G; Zhang, T; Zuo, Q, 2023) |
"To investigate the effects of carvedilol, irbesartan and their combination on myocardial collagen network remodeling after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in rats." | 7.73 | [Experimental study of effect of carvedilol on myocardial collagen network remodeling after acute myocardial infarction in rats]. ( Bian, SY; Liu, HB; Wang, L; Yang, TS; Yang, X; Yi, J, 2005) |
"The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of canagliflozin (CANA) on ventricular remodeling in patients with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) heart failure and to further investigate its possible molecular mechanisms." | 4.31 | Canagliflozin Ameliorates Ventricular Remodeling through Apelin/Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 Signaling in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction Rats. ( Guo, Y; He, L; Ma, S; Wang, X; Wang, Y; Wang, Z; Zhai, J; Zhang, G; Zhang, T; Zuo, Q, 2023) |
" A rat model of thyrotoxicosis was established by daily intraperitoneal injections of L-thyroxine (T(4), 100 μg/kg) for 4 weeks." | 3.78 | Irbesartan prevents myocardial remodeling in experimental thyrotoxic cardiomyopathy. ( Cho, KI; Choi, BG; Jeon, YK; Kang, JH; Kim, BH; Kim, IJ; Kim, JY; Kim, SJ; Kim, SM; Kim, SS; Kim, YK, 2012) |
"Irbesartan or emodin or 2 drugs together can inhibit myocardial remodeling in renovascular hypertension rats probably by reducing TGF-β1 and CTGF expression." | 3.78 | Irbesartan and emodin on myocardial remodeling in Goldblatt hypertensive rats. ( Chen, C; Chen, Q; Li, ZG; Liang, Z, 2012) |
"To investigate the effects of carvedilol, irbesartan and their combination on myocardial collagen network remodeling after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in rats." | 3.73 | [Experimental study of effect of carvedilol on myocardial collagen network remodeling after acute myocardial infarction in rats]. ( Bian, SY; Liu, HB; Wang, L; Yang, TS; Yang, X; Yi, J, 2005) |
"CT-1 was assumed to take part in the ventricular remodeling." | 1.34 | [Expression of cardiotrophin-1 and effects of irbesartan in adriamycin induced cardiomyopathy in rats]. ( Chen, Y; Li, CC; Yao, JM; Zhuang, HP, 2007) |
" Thus, AT(1) blockade with irbesartan, at an oral daily dosage that gave a slight but significant reduction of systolic blood pressure, largely counteracts the development of myocyte hypertrophy and associated functional alterations." | 1.32 | Treatment with irbesartan counteracts the functional remodeling of ventricular myocytes from hypertensive rats. ( Cerbai, E; De Paoli, P; Lonardo, G; Mugelli, A; Sartiani, L, 2003) |
Timeframe | Studies, this research(%) | All Research% |
---|---|---|
pre-1990 | 0 (0.00) | 18.7374 |
1990's | 1 (5.00) | 18.2507 |
2000's | 14 (70.00) | 29.6817 |
2010's | 3 (15.00) | 24.3611 |
2020's | 2 (10.00) | 2.80 |
Authors | Studies |
---|---|
Zhang, T | 1 |
Wang, X | 2 |
Wang, Z | 1 |
Zhai, J | 1 |
He, L | 1 |
Wang, Y | 1 |
Zuo, Q | 1 |
Ma, S | 1 |
Zhang, G | 1 |
Guo, Y | 1 |
Zhang, J | 1 |
Yang, L | 1 |
Ding, Y | 1 |
Jing, L | 1 |
Li, WM | 1 |
Zhou, LJ | 1 |
Li, S | 1 |
Kou, JJ | 1 |
Song, J | 1 |
Kassiri, Z | 1 |
Zhong, J | 1 |
Guo, D | 1 |
Basu, R | 1 |
Liu, PP | 1 |
Scholey, JW | 1 |
Penninger, JM | 1 |
Oudit, GY | 1 |
Zile, MR | 1 |
Gottdiener, JS | 1 |
Hetzel, SJ | 1 |
McMurray, JJ | 1 |
Komajda, M | 1 |
McKelvie, R | 1 |
Baicu, CF | 1 |
Massie, BM | 1 |
Carson, PE | 1 |
Kim, BH | 1 |
Cho, KI | 1 |
Kim, SM | 1 |
Kim, JY | 1 |
Choi, BG | 1 |
Kang, JH | 1 |
Jeon, YK | 1 |
Kim, SS | 1 |
Kim, SJ | 1 |
Kim, YK | 1 |
Kim, IJ | 1 |
Chen, C | 1 |
Liang, Z | 1 |
Chen, Q | 1 |
Li, ZG | 1 |
Cerbai, E | 1 |
De Paoli, P | 1 |
Sartiani, L | 1 |
Lonardo, G | 1 |
Mugelli, A | 1 |
Nguyen, QT | 1 |
Colombo, F | 1 |
Clement, R | 1 |
Gosselin, H | 1 |
Rouleau, JL | 1 |
Calderone, A | 1 |
Huang, YS | 1 |
Sun, JH | 1 |
Li, XZ | 1 |
Lacour, C | 1 |
Roccon, A | 1 |
Galindo, G | 1 |
Canals, F | 1 |
Hogie, M | 1 |
Segondy, D | 1 |
Briand, D | 1 |
Roque, C | 1 |
Herbert, JM | 2 |
Nisato, D | 2 |
Jugdutt, BI | 1 |
Menon, V | 1 |
Fraccarollo, D | 1 |
Galuppo, P | 1 |
Schmidt, I | 1 |
Ertl, G | 1 |
Bauersachs, J | 1 |
Zhang, RY | 1 |
Huang, YL | 1 |
Sun, YH | 1 |
Liu, HB | 1 |
Bian, SY | 1 |
Yang, TS | 1 |
Wang, L | 1 |
Yi, J | 1 |
Yang, X | 1 |
Berthonneche, C | 1 |
Sulpice, T | 1 |
Tanguy, S | 1 |
O'Connor, S | 1 |
Janiak, P | 1 |
de Leiris, J | 1 |
Boucher, F | 1 |
Zhuang, HP | 1 |
Yao, JM | 1 |
Chen, Y | 1 |
Li, CC | 1 |
de Beer, VJ | 1 |
Sorop, O | 1 |
Pijnappels, DA | 1 |
Dekkers, DH | 1 |
Boomsma, F | 1 |
Lamers, JM | 1 |
Duncker, DJ | 1 |
Merkus, D | 1 |
Whaley-Connell, A | 1 |
Habibi, J | 1 |
Cooper, SA | 1 |
Demarco, VG | 1 |
Hayden, MR | 1 |
Stump, CS | 1 |
Link, D | 1 |
Ferrario, CM | 1 |
Sowers, JR | 1 |
Richer, C | 1 |
Fornes, P | 1 |
Cazaubon, C | 1 |
Domergue, V | 1 |
Giudicelli, JF | 1 |
Trial | Phase | Enrollment | Study Type | Start Date | Status | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRospectIve Study of Sacubitril/ValsarTan on MyocardIal OxygenatioN and Fibrosis in PatiEnts With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction[NCT04128891] | Phase 3 | 0 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2020-02-01 | Withdrawn (stopped due to Funding not approved) | ||
Redefining the Phenotypic Spectrum of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF) by Deep Phenotyping and Machine Learning Methods: The PACIFIC-PRESERVED Study (PhenomApping, ClassIFication, and Innovation for Cardiac Dysfunction - HF With PRES[NCT04189029] | 2,620 participants (Anticipated) | Observational [Patient Registry] | 2019-12-09 | Recruiting | |||
Irbesartan in Heart Failure With Preserved Systolic Function (I-Preserve)[NCT00095238] | Phase 3 | 4,128 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2002-06-30 | Completed | ||
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024] |
Adjusted ratio to baseline in geometric mean in Pro-BNP in the blood. Ratio to Baseline = On-therapy geometric mean divided by baseline geometric mean. A lower score signifies improvement. Change from baseline adjusted for baseline value and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor use at baseline. Analysis uses natural logarithms of excretion rate values. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6, Month 14
Intervention | pg/mL (Geometric Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo - Month 6 | 0.98 |
Irbesartan - Month 6 | 0.93 |
Placebo - Month 14 | 1.00 |
Irbesartan - Month 14 | 1.01 |
NYHA functional classification=4-tiered system relating symptoms to everyday activities & quality of life. (See Reporting Groups for description of each class.) Change of NYHA functional class from baseline was grouped into 3 categories: improved, unchanged, or worsened (based on case report form [CRF] assessment). If a post-randomization CRF assessment was missing or participant died, was hospitalized for worsening heart failure or discontinued study medication for worsening heart failure, the participant was classified as Major Event. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, Final Visit. The trial was designed to end after 1440 primary endpoint events, projected duration=6.0 ± 0.5 years.
Intervention | participants (Number) | |||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Month 6 - Improved | Month 6 - Unchanged | Month 6 - Worsened | Month 6 - Major Event | Month 6 - No Data | Month 10 - Improved | Month 10 - Unchanged | Month 10 - Worsened | Month 10 - Major Event | Month 10 - No Data | Month 14 - Improved | Month 14 - Unchanged | Month 14 - Worsened | Month 14 - Major Event | Month 14 - No Data | Final Visit - Improved | Final Visit - Unchanged | Final Visit - Worsened | Final Visit - Major Event | Final Visit - No Data | |
Irbesartan Baseline All Classes Combined | 936 | 966 | 48 | 10 | 107 | 948 | 911 | 58 | 41 | 109 | 933 | 866 | 61 | 75 | 132 | 928 | 658 | 97 | 324 | 60 |
Irbesartan Baseline Class I or II | 55 | 310 | 41 | 2 | 18 | 44 | 294 | 53 | 10 | 25 | 38 | 287 | 50 | 22 | 29 | 42 | 230 | 68 | 75 | 11 |
Irbesartan Class III or IV | 881 | 656 | 7 | 8 | 89 | 904 | 617 | 5 | 31 | 84 | 895 | 579 | 11 | 53 | 103 | 886 | 428 | 29 | 249 | 49 |
Placebo Baseline All Classes Combined | 881 | 1016 | 51 | 14 | 98 | 902 | 939 | 71 | 42 | 106 | 902 | 890 | 69 | 80 | 119 | 882 | 694 | 107 | 320 | 57 |
Placebo Baseline Class I or II | 47 | 338 | 47 | 2 | 11 | 42 | 317 | 63 | 9 | 14 | 39 | 312 | 62 | 16 | 16 | 42 | 254 | 78 | 66 | 5 |
Placebo Class III or IV | 834 | 678 | 4 | 12 | 87 | 860 | 622 | 8 | 33 | 92 | 863 | 578 | 7 | 64 | 103 | 840 | 440 | 29 | 254 | 52 |
Based on the Cockcroft-Gault formula calculation, a commonly used surrogate marker to estimate creatinine clearance, which in turn is an approximate measure of GFR. It employs serum creatinine measurements and a patient's weight to predict the creatinine clearance. Adjusted for baseline GFR and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor use at baseline (ACE-I). A decrease from baseline signifies worsening. The adjusted mean change from baseline value is from the model (calculated prior to rounding), whereas the other two points are the baseline mean and post mean. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6, Month 18, Month 30
Intervention | mL/min/1.73m2 (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Baseline Mean | Post-Baseline Mean | Adjusted Mean Change | |
Irbesartan - Month 18 | 73.49 | 68.00 | -5.50 |
Irbesartan - Month 30 | 74.37 | 67.05 | -7.12 |
Irbesartan - Month 6 | 73.13 | 69.21 | -3.91 |
Placebo - Month 18 | 73.58 | 70.88 | -2.69 |
Placebo - Month 30 | 73.34 | 69.51 | -4.02 |
Placebo - Month 6 | 73.02 | 71.97 | -1.07 |
Based on the Cockcroft-Gault formula calculation, a commonly used surrogate marker to estimate creatinine clearance, which in turn is an approximate measure of GFR. It employs serum creatinine measurements and a patient's weight to predict the creatinine clearance. Adjusted for baseline GFR and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor use at baseline (ACE-I). A decrease from baseline signifies worsening. The adjusted mean change from baseline value is from the model (calculated prior to rounding), whereas the other two points are the baseline mean and post mean. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 42, Month 54, Month 66
Intervention | mL/min/1.73m2 (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Baseline Mean | Post-Baseline Mean | Adjusted Mean Change | |
Irbesartan - Month 42 | 74.95 | 67.48 | -7.36 |
Irbesartan - Month 54 | 75.17 | 68.24 | -6.93 |
Irbesartan - Month 66 | 71.84 | 64.85 | -5.46 |
Placebo - Month 42 | 74.37 | 71.34 | -3.14 |
Placebo - Month 54 | 75.29 | 72.65 | -2.63 |
Placebo - Month 66 | 63.47 | 60.09 | -4.91 |
Mean score at baseline and final visit in Minnesota Living with Heart Failure (MLWHF) questionnaire, a 21-item, patient-reported, 6-point (ranging from 0-5; higher score=poorer quality of life; highest possible score=105) measurement of quality of life in persons with heart failure. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Baseline, Final Visit=last scheduled visit specified in the protocol at conclusion of the entire study by the sponsor. The trial was designed to end after 1440 primary endpoint events, projected duration=6.0 ± 0.5 years.
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Baseline Mean | Final Visit Mean | |
Irbesartan - Final Visit | 38.9 | 38.3 |
Placebo - Final Visit | 42.5 | 42.6 |
Mean score and adjusted mean change from baseline in Minnesota Living with Heart Failure (MLWHF) questionnaire, a 21-item, patient-reported, 6-point (ranging from 0-5; higher score=poorer quality of life; highest possible score=105) measurement of quality of life in persons with heart failure. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6, Month 14
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Baseline Mean Score | Mean Score at Timepoint | Adjusted Mean Change from Baseline | |
Irbesartan - Month 14 | 42.8 | 32.1 | -10.6 |
Irbesartan - Month 6 | 43.0 | 33.2 | -9.8 |
Placebo - Month 14 | 42.7 | 31.6 | -11.2 |
Placebo - Month 6 | 42.7 | 32.9 | -10.0 |
Frequency of new onset AF in participants with no prior AF history or evidence of AF on baseline ECG. Stratified by use of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and measured by adverse events reporting and final ECG recording read by the investigator. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Baseline, Final Visit
Intervention | participants (Number) | |
---|---|---|
No prior AF history or Evidence on Baseline ECG | Participants with New Onset Atrial Fibrillation | |
Irbesartan + ACE-I Use | 366 | 35 |
Irbesartan no ACE-I Use | 1089 | 103 |
Placebo + ACE-I Use | 344 | 29 |
Placebo no ACE-I Use | 1102 | 99 |
Assessments are directly based on the Case Report Form (CRF). If the post-randomization CRF assessment was missing and the subject died, was hospitalized for worsening heart failure, or discontinued study medication for worsening heart failure, the subject was considered as having a Major Event. Participants who are summarized under Major Events are categorized as Worsened Markedly. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6, Month 14, Final Visit. The trial was designed to end after 1440 primary endpoint events, projected duration=6.0 ± 0.5 years.
Intervention | Participants (Number) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Month 6 - Improved Markedly | Month 6 - Improved Moderately | Month 6 - Improved Slightly | Month 6 - Unchanged | Month 6 - Worsened Slightly | Month 6 - Worsened Moderately | Month 6 - Worsened Markedly | Month 6 - Major Event | Month 6 - No Data | Month 14 - Improved Markedly | Month 14 - Improved Moderately | Month 14 - Improved Slightly | Month 14 - Unchanged | Month 14 - Worsened Slightly | Month 14 - Worsened Moderately | Month 14 - Worsened Markedly | Month 14 - Major Event | Month 14 - No Data | Final Visit - Improved Markedly | Final Visit - Improved Moderately | Final Visit - Improved Slightly | Final Visit - Unchanged | Final Visit - Worsened Slightly | Final Visit - Worsened Moderately | Final Visit - Worsened Markedly | Final Visit - Major Event | Final Visit - No Data | |
Irbesartan | 255 | 549 | 512 | 508 | 83 | 22 | 9 | 8 | 121 | 247 | 519 | 460 | 476 | 103 | 28 | 13 | 68 | 153 | 213 | 382 | 328 | 460 | 114 | 64 | 35 | 395 | 76 |
Placebo | 276 | 536 | 501 | 510 | 83 | 22 | 10 | 7 | 116 | 232 | 531 | 430 | 509 | 90 | 39 | 10 | 74 | 146 | 212 | 339 | 335 | 461 | 145 | 75 | 32 | 384 | 78 |
Assessments are directly based on the Case Report Form (CRF). If the post-randomization CRF assessment was missing and the subject died, was hospitalized for worsening heart failure, or discontinued study medication for worsening heart failure, the subject was considered as having a Major Event. Participants who are summarized under Major Events are categorized as Worsened Markedly. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6, Month 14, Final Visit. The trial was designed to end after 1440 primary endpoint events, projected duration=6.0 ± 0.5 years.
Intervention | Participants (Number) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Month 6 - Improved Markedly | Month 6 - Improved Moderately | Month 6 - Improved Slightly | Month 6 - Unchanged | Month 6 - Worsened Slightly | Month 6 - Worsened Moderately | Month 6 - Worsened Markedly | Month 6 - Major Event | Month 6 - No Data | Month 14 - Improved Markedly | Month 14 - Improved Moderately | Month 14 - Improved Slightly | Month 14 - Unchanged | Month 14 - Worsened Slightly | Month 14 - Worsened Moderately | Month 14 - Worsened Markedly | Month 14 - Major Event | Month 14 - No Data | Final Visit - Improved Markedly | Final Visit - Improved Moderately | Final Visit - Improved Slightly | Final Visit - Unchanged | Final Visit - Worsened Slightly | Final Visit - Worsened Moderately | Final Visit - Worsened Markedly | Final Visit - Major Event | Final Visit - No Data | |
Irbesartan | 193 | 523 | 504 | 579 | 97 | 28 | 13 | 8 | 122 | 195 | 513 | 439 | 525 | 115 | 48 | 11 | 68 | 153 | 157 | 361 | 319 | 479 | 166 | 80 | 34 | 395 | 76 |
Placebo | 200 | 519 | 471 | 596 | 101 | 38 | 13 | 7 | 116 | 182 | 489 | 443 | 559 | 109 | 43 | 16 | 74 | 146 | 178 | 300 | 337 | 477 | 176 | 90 | 42 | 383 | 78 |
Assessments are directly based on the Case Report Form (CRF). If the post-randomization CRF assessment was missing and the subject died, was hospitalized for worsening heart failure, or discontinued study medication for worsening heart failure, the subject was considered as having a Major Event. Participants who are summarized under Major Events are categorized as Worsened Markedly. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6, Month 14, Final Visit. The trial was designed to end after 1440 primary endpoint events, projected duration=6.0 ± 0.5 years.
Intervention | Participants (Number) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Month 6 - Improved Markedly | Month 6 - Improved Moderately | Month 6 - Improved Slightly | Month 6 - Unchanged | Month 6 - Worsened Slightly | Month 6 - Worsened Moderately | Month 6 - Worsened Markedly | Month 6 - Major Event | Month 6 - No Data | Month 14 - Improved Markedly | Month 14 - Improved Moderately | Month 14 - Improved Slightly | Month 14 - Unchanged | Month 14 - Worsened Slightly | Month 14 - Worsened Moderately | Month 14 - Worsened Markedly | Month 14 - Major Event | Month 14 - No Data | Final Visit - Improved Markedly | Final Visit - Improved Moderately | Final Visit - Improved Slightly | Final Visit - Unchanged | Final Visit - Worsened Slightly | Final Visit - Worsened Moderately | Final Visit - Worsened Markedly | Final Visit - Major Event | Final Event - No Data | |
Irbesartan | 235 | 552 | 529 | 537 | 63 | 13 | 8 | 8 | 122 | 234 | 532 | 461 | 503 | 78 | 30 | 8 | 68 | 153 | 207 | 378 | 332 | 480 | 121 | 52 | 25 | 396 | 76 |
Placebo | 230 | 563 | 519 | 529 | 69 | 20 | 8 | 7 | 116 | 206 | 534 | 450 | 527 | 82 | 35 | 7 | 74 | 146 | 201 | 339 | 352 | 495 | 109 | 76 | 28 | 383 | 78 |
Treatment comparisons for time to all-cause death (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percentage at 1 Year | Percentage at 2 Years | Percentage at 3 Years | Percentage at 4 Years | Percentage at 5 Years | |
Irbesartan | 4.1 | 8.1 | 12.8 | 17.9 | 25.0 |
Placebo | 3.8 | 8.6 | 13.8 | 18.5 | 23.6 |
Treatment comparisons for time to cardiovascular death (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percentage 1 Year | Percentage 2 Years | Percentage 3 Years | Percentage at 4 Years | Percentage at 5 Years | |
Irbesartan | 3.3 | 6.2 | 9.6 | 13.0 | 18.0 |
Placebo | 3.0 | 6.5 | 10.0 | 13.1 | 17.1 |
Treatment comparisons for time to CV death or CV hospitalization. Protocol-specified CV hospitalizations include hospitalizations ≥24 hrs or involve a calendar date change for a primary cause of worsening heart failure, unstable angina, myocardial infarction, ventricular dysrhythmia, atrial dysrhythmia or stroke that also requires intravenous or intramuscular therapy or a related procedure or significant augmentation of oral therapy. Protocol specified CV hospitalizations also include myocardial infarction or stroke occurring during any hospitalization. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percentage at 1 Year | Percentage at 2 Years | Percentage at 3 Years | Percentage at 4 Years | Percentage at 5 Years | |
Irbesartan | 11.6 | 19.2 | 24.2 | 30.0 | 35.0 |
Placebo | 11.4 | 20.0 | 25.8 | 30.9 | 35.8 |
Treatment comparisons for time to cardiovascular death, non-fatal MI, or non-fatal stroke. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percentage at 1 Year | Percentage at 2 Years | Percentage at 3 Years | Percentage at 4 Years | Percentage at 5 Years | |
Irbesartan | 5.2 | 8.7 | 12.9 | 17.2 | 23.0 |
Placebo | 4.2 | 9.3 | 13.6 | 17.6 | 22.4 |
Treatment comparisons for time to heart failure mortality or heart failure hospitalization (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percentage at 1 Year | Percentage at 2 Years | Percentage at 3 Years | Percentage at 4 Years | Percentage at 5 Years | |
Irbesartan | 7.9 | 12.9 | 15.7 | 19.8 | 23.6 |
Placebo | 8.2 | 13.7 | 17.2 | 20.3 | 23.8 |
Treatment comparisons for time to protocol-specified CV hospitalization. Protocol-specified CV hospitalizations include hospitalizations ≥24 hrs or involve a calendar date change for a primary cause of worsening heart failure, unstable angina, myocardial infarction, ventricular dysrhythmia, atrial dysrhythmia or stroke that also requires intravenous or intramuscular therapy or a related procedure or significant augmentation of oral therapy. Protocol specified CV hospitalizations also include myocardial infarction or stroke occurring during any hospitalization. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percentage at 1 Year | Percentage at 2 Years | Percentage at 3 Years | Percentage at 4 Years | Percentage at 5 Years | |
Irbesartan | 9.7 | 16.3 | 20.5 | 24.8 | 28.5 |
Placebo | 9.8 | 17.1 | 21.7 | 25.9 | 29.0 |
Treatment comparisons for time to first occurrence of composite outcome of all-cause death (composite outcome of death) or protocol-specified CV hospitalization. Protocol-specified CV hospitalizations include those ≥24 hrs or involving a calendar date change for a primary cause of worsening heart failure, unstable angina, myocardial infarction, ventricular or atrial dysrhythmia, or stroke, that also require intravenous or intramuscular therapy or a related procedure or significant augmentation of oral therapy. In addition, MI or stroke during any hospitalization are included. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percentage at 1 Year | Percentage at 2 Years | Percentage at 3 Years | Percentage at 4 Years | Percentage at 5 Years | |
Irbesartan | 12.3 | 20.7 | 26.4 | 32.9 | 39.2 |
Placebo | 12.1 | 21.3 | 28.4 | 34.2 | 39.5 |
Treatment comparisons for time to new onset of diabetes (from adverse event reporting) among subjects with no prior history of diabetes. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percentage at 1 Year | Percentage at 2 Years | Percentage at 3 Years | Percentage at 4 Years | Percentage at 5 Years | |
Irbesartan | 0.7 | 2.1 | 3.1 | 4.6 | 5.2 |
Placebo | 1.2 | 2.8 | 3.9 | 5.4 | 6.2 |
This was an assessment of the change in overall physician opinion of change from baseline status. Assessments are directly based on the Case Report Form (CRF). If the post-randomization CRF assessment was missing and the subject died, was hospitalized for worsening heart failure, or discontinued study medication for worsening heart failure, the subject was considered as having a Major Event. Participants who are summarized under Major Events are categorized as Worsened Markedly. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6, Month 14, Final Visit. The trial was designed to end after 1440 primary endpoint events, projected duration=6.0 ± 0.5 years.
Intervention | participants (Number) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Month 6 - Improved Markedly | Month 6 - Improved Moderately | Month 6 - Improved Slightly | Month 6 - Unchanged | Month 6 - Worsened Slightly | Month 6 - Worsened Moderately | Month 6 - Worsened Markedly | Month 6 - Major Event | Month 6 - No Data | Month 14 - Improved Markedly | Month 14 - Improved Moderately | Month 14 - Improved Slightly | Month 14 - Unchanged | Month 14 - Worsened Slightly | Month 14 - Worsened Moderately | Month 14 - Worsened Markedly | Month 14 - Major Event | Month 14 - No Data | Final Visit - Improved Markedly | Final Visit - Improved Moderately | Final Visit - Improved Slightly | Final Visit - Unchanged | Final Visit - Worsened Slightly | Final Visit - Worsened Moderately | Final Visit - Worsened Markedly | Final Visit - Major Event | Final Visit - No Data | |
Irbesartan | 230 | 562 | 533 | 528 | 60 | 17 | 0 | 8 | 129 | 214 | 546 | 442 | 507 | 72 | 21 | 5 | 75 | 185 | 180 | 430 | 344 | 477 | 117 | 41 | 23 | 364 | 91 |
Placebo | 198 | 575 | 529 | 541 | 58 | 16 | 4 | 8 | 132 | 195 | 537 | 435 | 548 | 73 | 19 | 6 | 79 | 169 | 186 | 367 | 361 | 504 | 117 | 56 | 28 | 350 | 92 |
2 trials available for avapro and Cardiac Remodeling, Ventricular
Article | Year |
---|---|
Prevalence and significance of alterations in cardiac structure and function in patients with heart failure and a preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Biphenyl Compounds; Cohort Studies; Diastole; Echocar | 2011 |
Prevalence and significance of alterations in cardiac structure and function in patients with heart failure and a preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Biphenyl Compounds; Cohort Studies; Diastole; Echocar | 2011 |
Prevalence and significance of alterations in cardiac structure and function in patients with heart failure and a preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Biphenyl Compounds; Cohort Studies; Diastole; Echocar | 2011 |
Prevalence and significance of alterations in cardiac structure and function in patients with heart failure and a preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Biphenyl Compounds; Cohort Studies; Diastole; Echocar | 2011 |
Prevalence and significance of alterations in cardiac structure and function in patients with heart failure and a preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Biphenyl Compounds; Cohort Studies; Diastole; Echocar | 2011 |
Prevalence and significance of alterations in cardiac structure and function in patients with heart failure and a preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Biphenyl Compounds; Cohort Studies; Diastole; Echocar | 2011 |
Prevalence and significance of alterations in cardiac structure and function in patients with heart failure and a preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Biphenyl Compounds; Cohort Studies; Diastole; Echocar | 2011 |
Prevalence and significance of alterations in cardiac structure and function in patients with heart failure and a preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Biphenyl Compounds; Cohort Studies; Diastole; Echocar | 2011 |
Prevalence and significance of alterations in cardiac structure and function in patients with heart failure and a preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Biphenyl Compounds; Cohort Studies; Diastole; Echocar | 2011 |
[Effects of irbesartan on remodeling of the left ventricular following acute myocardial infarction].
Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Biphenyl Compounds; Heart Ventricles; Humans; Irbesartan; M | 2003 |
18 other studies available for avapro and Cardiac Remodeling, Ventricular
Article | Year |
---|---|
Canagliflozin Ameliorates Ventricular Remodeling through Apelin/Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 Signaling in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction Rats.
Topics: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2; Animals; Apelin; Canagliflozin; Fibrosis; Heart Failure; Humans; Ir | 2023 |
Effects of irbesartan on phenotypic alterations in monocytes and the inflammatory status of hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy.
Topics: Aged; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Antigens, CD; Antigens, Differentiation, Myelomonocytic; Antihyperte | 2021 |
Expression of renin-angiotensin system and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors in alcoholic cardiomyopathy.
Topics: Angiotensin I; Angiotensin II; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensinogen; Animals; Bi | 2008 |
Loss of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 accelerates maladaptive left ventricular remodeling in response to myocardial infarction.
Topics: Adaptation, Physiological; Angiotensin I; Angiotensin II; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; A | 2009 |
Irbesartan prevents myocardial remodeling in experimental thyrotoxic cardiomyopathy.
Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Animals; Biphenyl Compounds; Cardiomyopathies; Echocardiogr | 2012 |
Irbesartan and emodin on myocardial remodeling in Goldblatt hypertensive rats.
Topics: Angiotensin II; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Animals; Antihypertensive Agents; Biphenyl | 2012 |
Treatment with irbesartan counteracts the functional remodeling of ventricular myocytes from hypertensive rats.
Topics: Action Potentials; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Animals; Biphenyl Compounds; Cardiomegaly; Cell | 2003 |
AT1 receptor antagonist therapy preferentially ameliorated right ventricular function and phenotype during the early phase of remodeling post-MI.
Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Animals; Biphenyl Compounds; Irbesartan; Male; Myocardial I | 2003 |
Effects of differential blockade of the renin-angiotensin system in postinfarcted rats.
Topics: Aldosterone; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Anim | 2004 |
AT1 receptor blockade limits myocardial injury and upregulates AT2 receptors during reperfused myocardial infarction.
Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Animals; Biphenyl Compounds; Blood Pressure; Dogs; Heart Ra | 2004 |
Additive amelioration of left ventricular remodeling and molecular alterations by combined aldosterone and angiotensin receptor blockade after myocardial infarction.
Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Animals; Biphenyl Compounds; Blotting, Western; Collagen Ty | 2005 |
[Effects of combination therapy with angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibitor and angiotensin 1 receptor antagonist on ventricular remodeling and expression of endothelial nitric oxide synthase].
Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Animals; Biphenyl | 2005 |
[Experimental study of effect of carvedilol on myocardial collagen network remodeling after acute myocardial infarction in rats].
Topics: Animals; Biphenyl Compounds; Carbazoles; Carvedilol; Collagen; Disease Models, Animal; Hemodynamics; | 2005 |
AT1 receptor blockade prevents cardiac dysfunction after myocardial infarction in rats.
Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Animals; Biphenyl Compounds; Blood Pressure; Heart Rate; Ir | 2005 |
[Expression of cardiotrophin-1 and effects of irbesartan in adriamycin induced cardiomyopathy in rats].
Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Animals; Biphenyl Compounds; Cardiomyopathies; Cytokines; D | 2007 |
Integrative control of coronary resistance vessel tone by endothelin and angiotensin II is altered in swine with a recent myocardial infarction.
Topics: Angiotensin II; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Animals; Biphenyl Compounds; Coronary Circu | 2008 |
Effect of renin inhibition and AT1R blockade on myocardial remodeling in the transgenic Ren2 rat.
Topics: Amides; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Animals; Animals, Genetically Modified; Antihyperte | 2008 |
Effects of long-term angiotensin II AT1 receptor blockade on survival, hemodynamics and cardiac remodeling in chronic heart failure in rats.
Topics: Analysis of Variance; Angiotensin II; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Animals; Antihypertensive Ag | 1999 |