avapro has been researched along with Cardiac Failure in 76 studies
Irbesartan: A spiro compound, biphenyl and tetrazole derivative that acts as an angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist. It is used in the management of HYPERTENSION, and in the treatment of kidney disease.
irbesartan : A biphenylyltetrazole that is an angiotensin II receptor antagonist used mainly for the treatment of hypertension.
Excerpt | Relevance | Reference |
---|---|---|
"The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of canagliflozin (CANA) on ventricular remodeling in patients with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) heart failure and to further investigate its possible molecular mechanisms." | 8.31 | Canagliflozin Ameliorates Ventricular Remodeling through Apelin/Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 Signaling in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction Rats. ( Guo, Y; He, L; Ma, S; Wang, X; Wang, Y; Wang, Z; Zhai, J; Zhang, G; Zhang, T; Zuo, Q, 2023) |
" We aimed to compare the risks of myocardial infarction (MI), heart failure (HF), and cerebrovascular disease with the use of valsartan, losartan, irbesartan, and telmisartan with different half-lives in a national claim-based retrospective cohort of patients aged ≥ 40 years with hypertension." | 8.31 | Risk of myocardial infarction, heart failure, and cerebrovascular disease with the use of valsartan, losartan, irbesartan, and telmisartan in patients. ( Jeong, HE; Kim, JS; Ko, H; Lim, MJ; Shin, JY; Yoo, YG, 2023) |
"Arterial hypertension is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular diseases and one of the major causes for mortality worldwide." | 6.45 | Rational of the use of aliskiren in hypertension and beyond. ( Savvatis, K; Schultheiss, HP; Tschöpe, C; Westermann, D, 2009) |
"The authors pooled data from 3 trials-CHARM Preserved (Candesartan Cilexietil in Heart Failure Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and Morbidity), I-Preserve (Irbesartan in Heart Failure With Preserved Systolic Function), and the Americas region of TOPCAT (Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure With an Aldosterone Antagonist) (N = 8,916)-and examined whether MI before or following enrollment independently predicted CV death and heart failure (HF) hospitalization." | 5.34 | Myocardial Infarction in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Pooled Analysis of 3 Clinical Trials. ( Anand, IS; Carson, P; Claggett, BL; Cunningham, JW; Desai, AS; Jhund, PS; John, JE; Kober, L; Lewis, EF; McMurray, JJV; Pfeffer, MA; Pitt, B; Shah, SJ; Solomon, SD; Swedberg, K; Vaduganathan, M; Yusuf, S; Zile, MR, 2020) |
"Myocyte apoptosis and muscle atrophy were significantly decreased with irbesartan compared with untreated CHF rats." | 5.31 | Beneficial effects on skeletal muscle of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker irbesartan in experimental heart failure. ( Angelini, A; Battista Ambrosio, G; Dalla Libera, L; Ravara, B; Rossini, K; Sandri, M; Thiene, G; Vescovo, G, 2001) |
" Irbesartan and captopril significantly reduced systolic pressure and produced similar rightward shifts in the angiotensin I dose-response curve." | 5.30 | Comparison of irbesartan with captopril effects on cardiac hypertrophy and gene expression in heart failure-prone male SHHF/Mcc-fa(cp) rats. ( Carraway, JW; Holycross, BJ; McCune, SA; Park, S; Radin, MJ, 1999) |
"We analyzed outcomes by international geographic region in the Irbesartan in Heart Failure with Preserved systolic function trial (I-Preserve), the Candesartan in Heart failure Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM)-Preserved trial, the CHARM-Alternative and CHARM-Added HF-REF trials, and the Controlled Rosuvastatin Multinational Trial in HF-REF (CORONA)." | 5.20 | International geographic variation in event rates in trials of heart failure with preserved and reduced ejection fraction. ( Carson, PE; Granger, CB; Jhund, PS; Kjekshus, J; Komajda, M; Kristensen, SL; Køber, L; McKelvie, RS; McMurray, JJ; Pfeffer, MA; Solomon, SD; Swedberg, K; Wedel, H; Wikstrand, J; Yusuf, S; Zile, MR, 2015) |
"Participants in the Atrial Fibrillation Clopidogrel Trial With Irbesartan for Prevention of Vascular Events (ACTIVE) trials with HF, but not randomized to oral anticoagulation, were categorized as having preserved versus reduced ejection fraction." | 5.20 | Relationship between degree of left ventricular dysfunction, symptom status, and risk of embolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure. ( Connolly, SJ; Hart, RG; Healey, JS; Hohnloser, SH; McAlister, FA; Pfeffer, MA; Sandhu, RK; Yuan, F; Yusuf, S, 2015) |
"Examination of patients with reduced and preserved ejection fraction in the DIG (Digitalis Investigation Group) trials and the CHARM (Candesartan in Heart Failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and Morbidity) trials provides comparisons of outcomes in each of these types of heart failure." | 4.88 | What have we learned about patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction from DIG-PEF, CHARM-preserved, and I-PRESERVE? ( Campbell, RT; Castagno, D; Hawkins, NM; Jhund, PS; McMurray, JJ; Petrie, MC, 2012) |
"Here, we systematically review and evaluate prospective clinical studies of RAS inhibitors enrolling patients with HF-PEF, including the 3 major trials of RAS inhibition (Candesartan in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure and Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction [CHARM-Preserved], Irbesartan in Patients with Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction [I-PRESERVE], and Perindopril in Elderly People with Chronic Heart Failure [PEP-CHF])." | 4.86 | The effect of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors on mortality and heart failure hospitalization in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. ( Desai, AS; Givertz, MM; Shah, RV, 2010) |
"The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of canagliflozin (CANA) on ventricular remodeling in patients with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) heart failure and to further investigate its possible molecular mechanisms." | 4.31 | Canagliflozin Ameliorates Ventricular Remodeling through Apelin/Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 Signaling in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction Rats. ( Guo, Y; He, L; Ma, S; Wang, X; Wang, Y; Wang, Z; Zhai, J; Zhang, G; Zhang, T; Zuo, Q, 2023) |
" We aimed to compare the risks of myocardial infarction (MI), heart failure (HF), and cerebrovascular disease with the use of valsartan, losartan, irbesartan, and telmisartan with different half-lives in a national claim-based retrospective cohort of patients aged ≥ 40 years with hypertension." | 4.31 | Risk of myocardial infarction, heart failure, and cerebrovascular disease with the use of valsartan, losartan, irbesartan, and telmisartan in patients. ( Jeong, HE; Kim, JS; Ko, H; Lim, MJ; Shin, JY; Yoo, YG, 2023) |
"Patient data were pooled from the CHARM-Preserved (Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity), I-PRESERVE (Irbesartan in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction), and TOPCAT (Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone Antagonist trial) studies and were examined for the association between having a pacemaker and the risk of the primary composite of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization, the individual components of the composite, the 2 main modes of cardiovascular death (i." | 3.91 | Prior Pacemaker Implantation and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction. ( Anand, IS; Carson, PE; Desai, AS; Docherty, KF; Granger, CB; Jhund, PS; Komajda, M; McKelvie, RS; McMurray, JJV; Petrie, MC; Pfeffer, MA; Shen, L; Solomon, SD; Swedberg, K; Zile, MR, 2019) |
"Compared with other angiotensin-receptor blockers, telmisartan and valsartan were both associated with a lower risk of admission to hospital for acute myocardial infarction, stroke or heart failure among older adults with diabetes and hypertension." | 3.79 | Comparative effectiveness of angiotensin-receptor blockers for preventing macrovascular disease in patients with diabetes: a population-based cohort study. ( Antoniou, T; Camacho, X; Gomes, T; Juurlink, DN; Mamdani, MM; Yao, Z, 2013) |
"Elderly patients with heart failure who were prescribed losartan had worse survival rates compared with those prescribed other commonly used ARBs." | 3.74 | Angiotensin II receptor blockers for the treatment of heart failure: a class effect? ( Behlouli, H; Hudson, M; Humphries, K; Pilote, L; Sheppard, R; Tu, JV, 2007) |
"Obesity is a major risk factor for incident heart failure (HF)." | 2.76 | Body mass index and adverse cardiovascular outcomes in heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction: results from the Irbesartan in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (I-PRESERVE) trial. ( Anand, IS; Carson, PE; Haass, M; Kitzman, DW; Massie, BM; Miller, A; Zile, MR, 2011) |
"Myocardial fibrosis is a key pathological feature of HFPEF." | 2.76 | Relation of peripheral collagen markers to death and hospitalization in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: results of the I-PRESERVE collagen substudy. ( Anand, IS; Black, M; Carson, PE; Elsik, M; Komajda, M; Krum, H; Massie, BM; McKelvie, RS; McMurray, JJ; Ptaszynska, A; Schneider, HG; Zile, MR, 2011) |
"Heart failure was reported by investigators to have a hypertensive aetiology in 64% of patients." | 2.73 | Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: clinical characteristics of 4133 patients enrolled in the I-PRESERVE trial. ( Carson, PE; Donovan, JM; Komajda, M; Massie, BM; McKelvie, R; McMurray, JJ; Ptaszynska, A; Staiger, C; Zile, MR, 2008) |
"In patients with symptomatic congestive heart failure receiving optimal therapy with an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor and a beta-blocker, the impact of using an angiotensin receptor blocker on submaximal exercise capacity and on neurohumoral activation at rest and during stress has not been investigated." | 2.71 | Effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor plus irbesartan on maximal and submaximal exercise capacity and neurohumoral activation in patients with congestive heart failure. ( Blanchet, M; Curnier, D; De Champlain, J; Ducharme, A; Lamoureux, MC; Racine, N; Sheppard, R; Sirois, P; Tardif, JC; White, M, 2005) |
"Alterations in the pharmacokinetic parameters of a number of medications have been observed in patients with heart failure." | 2.70 | The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of irbesartan in heart failure. ( Hadjilambris, OW; Kollia, GD; Kostis, JB; Marino, MR; Palmisano, M; Vachharajani, NN, 2001) |
"Arterial hypertension is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular diseases and one of the major causes for mortality worldwide." | 2.45 | Rational of the use of aliskiren in hypertension and beyond. ( Savvatis, K; Schultheiss, HP; Tschöpe, C; Westermann, D, 2009) |
"Chronic heart failure is characterized as a clinical disorder by exercise intolerance." | 2.41 | Apoptosis and changes in contractile protein pattern in the skeletal muscle in heart failure. ( Ambrosio, GB; Dalla Libera, L; Vescovo, G, 2001) |
" Based on these pharmacokinetic and safety data, no dosage adjustments of IRBE are necessary for patients with RI, HI, or HF, or based on patient age, gender, or race." | 2.41 | Pharmacokinetics of irbesartan are not altered in special populations. ( Marino, MR; Vachharajani, NN, 2002) |
"Their use in congestive heart failure and renal disease is under investigation." | 2.40 | Angiotensin-II receptor antagonists: their place in therapy. ( Kirk, JK, 1999) |
"Myocyte apoptosis and muscle atrophy were significantly decreased with irbesartan compared with untreated CHF rats." | 1.31 | Beneficial effects on skeletal muscle of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker irbesartan in experimental heart failure. ( Angelini, A; Battista Ambrosio, G; Dalla Libera, L; Ravara, B; Rossini, K; Sandri, M; Thiene, G; Vescovo, G, 2001) |
" Irbesartan and captopril significantly reduced systolic pressure and produced similar rightward shifts in the angiotensin I dose-response curve." | 1.30 | Comparison of irbesartan with captopril effects on cardiac hypertrophy and gene expression in heart failure-prone male SHHF/Mcc-fa(cp) rats. ( Carraway, JW; Holycross, BJ; McCune, SA; Park, S; Radin, MJ, 1999) |
Timeframe | Studies, this research(%) | All Research% |
---|---|---|
pre-1990 | 0 (0.00) | 18.7374 |
1990's | 8 (10.53) | 18.2507 |
2000's | 29 (38.16) | 29.6817 |
2010's | 34 (44.74) | 24.3611 |
2020's | 5 (6.58) | 2.80 |
Authors | Studies |
---|---|
Zhang, T | 1 |
Wang, X | 1 |
Wang, Z | 2 |
Zhai, J | 1 |
He, L | 1 |
Wang, Y | 1 |
Zuo, Q | 1 |
Ma, S | 1 |
Zhang, G | 1 |
Guo, Y | 1 |
Yoo, YG | 1 |
Lim, MJ | 1 |
Kim, JS | 1 |
Jeong, HE | 1 |
Ko, H | 1 |
Shin, JY | 1 |
Kuno, T | 1 |
Ueyama, H | 1 |
Fujisaki, T | 1 |
Briasouli, A | 1 |
Takagi, H | 1 |
Briasoulis, A | 1 |
Cunningham, JW | 1 |
Vaduganathan, M | 1 |
Claggett, BL | 1 |
John, JE | 1 |
Desai, AS | 5 |
Lewis, EF | 2 |
Zile, MR | 20 |
Carson, P | 3 |
Jhund, PS | 9 |
Kober, L | 1 |
Pitt, B | 2 |
Shah, SJ | 1 |
Swedberg, K | 5 |
Anand, IS | 15 |
Yusuf, S | 4 |
McMurray, JJV | 4 |
Pfeffer, MA | 7 |
Solomon, SD | 5 |
Shen, L | 4 |
Carson, PE | 19 |
Granger, CB | 4 |
Køber, L | 3 |
Komajda, M | 20 |
McKelvie, RS | 14 |
Bramblett, T | 1 |
Teleb, M | 1 |
Albaghdadi, A | 1 |
Agrawal, H | 1 |
Mukherjee, D | 1 |
Docherty, KF | 1 |
Petrie, MC | 3 |
Tromp, J | 1 |
Lam, CSP | 1 |
Antoniou, T | 1 |
Camacho, X | 1 |
Yao, Z | 1 |
Gomes, T | 1 |
Juurlink, DN | 1 |
Mamdani, MM | 1 |
Manni, ME | 1 |
Zazzeri, M | 1 |
Musilli, C | 1 |
Bigagli, E | 1 |
Lodovici, M | 1 |
Raimondi, L | 1 |
Böhm, M | 1 |
Perez, AC | 2 |
Reil, JC | 1 |
Massie, BM | 14 |
McMurray, JJ | 15 |
Damman, K | 1 |
Massie, B | 1 |
Metra, M | 1 |
Lombardi, C | 1 |
Kristensen, SL | 1 |
Kjekshus, J | 1 |
Wikstrand, J | 1 |
Wedel, H | 1 |
Rossignol, P | 1 |
Zannad, F | 1 |
Sandhu, RK | 1 |
Hohnloser, SH | 2 |
Yuan, F | 1 |
Hart, RG | 2 |
Connolly, SJ | 2 |
McAlister, FA | 1 |
Healey, JS | 2 |
Badar, AA | 1 |
Perez-Moreno, AC | 1 |
Hawkins, NM | 2 |
Brunton, AP | 1 |
Gardner, RS | 1 |
Kao, DP | 1 |
Lewsey, JD | 1 |
Lindenfeld, J | 1 |
Cannon, JA | 1 |
McKelvie, R | 6 |
Anderson, S | 1 |
Donovan, M | 2 |
Iverson, E | 1 |
Staiger, C | 2 |
Ptaszynska, A | 7 |
Preobrazhenksiĭ, DV | 1 |
Amato, JL | 2 |
Ghali, JK | 1 |
Tomoda, H | 1 |
Schillaci, G | 1 |
Pucci, G | 1 |
Pirro, M | 1 |
Trimarco, B | 1 |
Rosei, EA | 1 |
Westermann, D | 2 |
Savvatis, K | 1 |
Schultheiss, HP | 2 |
Tschöpe, C | 2 |
McMurray, J | 3 |
Zile, M | 2 |
Ramchandra, R | 1 |
Watson, AM | 1 |
Hood, SG | 1 |
May, CN | 1 |
Shah, RV | 1 |
Givertz, MM | 1 |
Gaasch, WH | 1 |
Haass, M | 2 |
Little, WC | 1 |
Miller, AB | 1 |
Lopez-Sendon, J | 1 |
Teerlink, JR | 1 |
White, M | 2 |
Hetzel, SJ | 2 |
Hetzel, S | 1 |
Demets, D | 1 |
Kitzman, DW | 2 |
Miller, A | 1 |
Pogue, J | 1 |
Chrolavicius, S | 1 |
Flather, M | 1 |
Joyner, CD | 1 |
Holtkamp, FA | 1 |
de Zeeuw, D | 1 |
de Graeff, PA | 1 |
Laverman, GD | 1 |
Berl, T | 1 |
Remuzzi, G | 1 |
Packham, D | 1 |
Lewis, JB | 1 |
Parving, HH | 1 |
Lambers Heerspink, HJ | 1 |
Oghlakian, GO | 1 |
Sipahi, I | 1 |
Fang, JC | 1 |
Rector, TS | 3 |
Cleland, JG | 1 |
Kuskowski, M | 3 |
Persson, H | 1 |
Krum, H | 1 |
Elsik, M | 1 |
Schneider, HG | 1 |
Black, M | 1 |
Desai, RJ | 1 |
Ashton, CM | 1 |
Deswal, A | 1 |
Morgan, RO | 1 |
Mehta, HB | 1 |
Chen, H | 1 |
Aparasu, RR | 1 |
Johnson, ML | 1 |
Packer, M | 1 |
Gottdiener, JS | 1 |
Baicu, CF | 1 |
Patel, VB | 1 |
Bodiga, S | 1 |
Fan, D | 1 |
Das, SK | 1 |
Wang, W | 1 |
Basu, R | 1 |
Zhong, J | 1 |
Kassiri, Z | 1 |
Oudit, GY | 1 |
Yang, W | 1 |
Joffe, MM | 1 |
Lam, CS | 1 |
Campbell, RT | 1 |
Castagno, D | 1 |
Zukowska-Szczechowska, E | 1 |
Gosek, K | 1 |
Grzeszczak, W | 1 |
Frantz, S | 1 |
Fraccarollo, D | 3 |
Wagner, H | 1 |
Behr, TM | 1 |
Jung, P | 1 |
Angermann, CE | 1 |
Ertl, G | 3 |
Bauersachs, J | 3 |
Terra, SG | 1 |
Schäfer, A | 1 |
Tas, P | 1 |
Schmidt, I | 2 |
Blanchet, M | 1 |
Sheppard, R | 2 |
Racine, N | 1 |
Ducharme, A | 1 |
Curnier, D | 1 |
Tardif, JC | 1 |
Sirois, P | 1 |
Lamoureux, MC | 1 |
De Champlain, J | 1 |
Galuppo, P | 1 |
Frangin, G | 1 |
Rutschow, S | 1 |
Jäger, S | 1 |
Linderer, A | 1 |
Anker, S | 1 |
Riad, A | 1 |
Unger, T | 1 |
Pauschinger, M | 1 |
Hudson, M | 1 |
Humphries, K | 1 |
Tu, JV | 1 |
Behlouli, H | 1 |
Pilote, L | 1 |
Kum, LC | 1 |
Yip, GW | 1 |
Lee, PW | 1 |
Lam, YY | 1 |
Wu, EB | 1 |
Chan, AK | 1 |
Fung, JW | 1 |
Chan, JY | 1 |
Zhang, Q | 1 |
Kong, SL | 1 |
Yu, CM | 1 |
Donovan, JM | 1 |
Trippodo, NC | 1 |
Panchal, BC | 1 |
Fox, M | 1 |
Carraway, JW | 1 |
Park, S | 1 |
McCune, SA | 1 |
Holycross, BJ | 1 |
Radin, MJ | 1 |
Havranek, EP | 1 |
Thomas, I | 1 |
Smith, WB | 1 |
Ponce, GA | 1 |
Bilsker, M | 1 |
Munger, MA | 1 |
Wolf, RA | 1 |
Baan, J | 1 |
Richer, C | 3 |
Fornes, P | 3 |
Cazaubon, C | 1 |
Domergue, V | 2 |
Nisato, D | 2 |
Giudicelli, JF | 3 |
Kirk, JK | 1 |
Willenheimer, R | 1 |
Coca, A | 1 |
Giner, V | 1 |
Petkun, W | 1 |
Bonarjee, VV | 1 |
Dickstein, K | 1 |
Gervais, M | 2 |
Dalla Libera, L | 2 |
Ravara, B | 1 |
Angelini, A | 1 |
Rossini, K | 1 |
Sandri, M | 1 |
Thiene, G | 1 |
Battista Ambrosio, G | 1 |
Vescovo, G | 2 |
Ambrosio, GB | 1 |
Upnitskiĭ, AA | 1 |
Khanina, NIu | 1 |
Belousov, IuB | 1 |
Kostis, JB | 1 |
Vachharajani, NN | 2 |
Hadjilambris, OW | 1 |
Kollia, GD | 1 |
Palmisano, M | 1 |
Marino, MR | 2 |
Schuijt, MP | 1 |
Basdew, M | 1 |
van Veghel, R | 1 |
de Vries, R | 1 |
Saxena, PR | 1 |
Schoemaker, RG | 1 |
Danser, AH | 1 |
Trabold, F | 1 |
Trial | Phase | Enrollment | Study Type | Start Date | Status | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure With an Aldosterone Antagonist (TOPCAT)[NCT00094302] | Phase 3 | 3,445 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2006-08-31 | Completed | ||
Candesartan Cilexetil in Heart Failure Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and Morbidity. Clinical Study of Candesartan in Patients With Heart Failure and Preserved Left Ventricular Systolic Function[NCT00634712] | Phase 3 | 734 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 1999-06-30 | Completed | ||
Irbesartan in Heart Failure With Preserved Systolic Function (I-Preserve)[NCT00095238] | Phase 3 | 4,128 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2002-06-30 | Completed | ||
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Influenza Vaccine to Prevent Adverse Vascular Events: A Pilot Study[NCT01945268] | Phase 4 | 107 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2015-04-30 | Completed | ||
PRospectIve Study of Sacubitril/ValsarTan on MyocardIal OxygenatioN and Fibrosis in PatiEnts With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction[NCT04128891] | Phase 3 | 0 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2020-02-01 | Withdrawn (stopped due to Funding not approved) | ||
Randomized Clinical Trial of Radiofrequency Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction for Reduced Healthcare Utilization[NCT04327596] | 2 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2021-01-25 | Terminated (stopped due to lack of enrollment) | |||
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Influenza Vaccine to Prevent Adverse Vascular Events[NCT02762851] | Phase 4 | 5,000 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2016-06-30 | Recruiting | ||
Mechanisms and Management of Exercise Intolerance in Older Heart Failure Patients With Preserved Ejection Fraction[NCT03111017] | 12 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2017-04-17 | Completed | |||
A Parallel Randomized Controlled Evaluation of Clopidogrel Plus Aspirin, With Factorial Evaluation of Irbesartan, for the Prevention of Vascular Events, in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation[NCT00249795] | Phase 3 | 9,016 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2003-06-30 | Completed | ||
Evaluation of Renal Sodium Excretion After Salt Loading in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction[NCT03837470] | Early Phase 1 | 14 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2019-05-06 | Completed | ||
Barostim Neo® - Baroreflex Activation Therapy® for Heart Failure[NCT02627196] | 1,200 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2016-04-19 | Active, not recruiting | |||
Redefining the Phenotypic Spectrum of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF) by Deep Phenotyping and Machine Learning Methods: The PACIFIC-PRESERVED Study (PhenomApping, ClassIFication, and Innovation for Cardiac Dysfunction - HF With PRES[NCT04189029] | 2,620 participants (Anticipated) | Observational [Patient Registry] | 2019-12-09 | Recruiting | |||
An Observational, Multicentre Study to Evaluate the Feasibility of a Novel Mobile Health Monitoring Platform to Capture Patient-centered Outcomes Measures Among Patients With Heart Failure (HF)[NCT04191356] | 67 participants (Actual) | Observational | 2020-10-17 | Terminated (stopped due to Collected enough data to support the Endpoints) | |||
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024] |
First incidence of aborted cardiac arrest (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | Events per 100 person-years (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 0.09 |
Spironolactone | 0.05 |
(NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | Events per 100 person-years (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 4.6 |
Spironolactone | 4.2 |
(NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | Events per 100 person-years (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 3.1 |
Spironolactone | 2.8 |
Hospitalization for MI, stroke or the management of heart failure, whichever occurred first (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | Events per 100 person-years (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 6.2 |
Spironolactone | 5.5 |
Average post-baseline Chloride, taking into consideration baseline Chloride, treatment group, the time between the post-baseline measures, and the correlation between repeated measures within an individual. (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | mEq/L (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 102.33 |
Spironolactone | 102.26 |
(NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | Events per 100 person-years (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 7.8 |
Spironolactone | 7.2 |
(NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | Events per 100 person-years (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 6.6 |
Spironolactone | 5.9 |
(NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | Events per 100 person-years (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 1.1 |
Spironolactone | 1.0 |
(NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | Events per 100 person-years (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 1.1 |
Spironolactone | 1.0 |
"Average post-baseline depression, taking into consideration baseline depression, treatment group, the time between the post-baseline measures, and the correlation between repeated measures within an individual.~The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) is a 10-item, self-administered instrument for screening, diagnosing, monitoring and measuring the severity of depression. Scores can range from 0-27, in which lower scores reflect better mental health status. The PH-Q was administered at the following study visits: baseline, month 12 and annually thereafter. Valid translations of this questionnaire were only available for subjects enrolled in the United States and Canada." (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 5.6 |
Spironolactone | 5.1 |
First incidence of a deterioration of renal function. The TOPCAT protocol defines deterioration of renal function as occurring if a subject has a serum creatinine value which is at least double the baseline value for that subject, and is also above the upper limit of normal (assumed to be 1.0 mg/dL for females and 1.2 mg/dL for males.) (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | Events per 100 person-years (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 2.2 |
Spironolactone | 3.2 |
First incidence of atrial fibrillation among subjects without a history of atrial fibrillation at baseline (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | Events per 100 person-years (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 1.4 |
Spironolactone | 1.4 |
Average post-baseline GFR, taking into consideration baseline GFR, treatment group, the time between the post-baseline measures, and the correlation between repeated measures within an individual. (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | mL/min/1.73m2 (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 67.50 |
Spironolactone | 65.20 |
First incidence of a hospitalization for any reason (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | Events per 100 person-years (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 20.0 |
Spironolactone | 18.8 |
First incidence of a hospitalization for the management of heart failure (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | Events per 100 person-years (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 4.6 |
Spironolactone | 3.8 |
First incidence of myocardial infarction (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | Events per 100 person-years (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 1.1 |
Spironolactone | 1.2 |
First incidence of new onset diabetes mellitus among subjects without a history of diabetes mellitus at baseline. (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | Events per 100 person-years (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 0.7 |
Spironolactone | 0.7 |
Average post-baseline Potassium, taking into consideration baseline Potassium, treatment group, the time between the post-baseline measures, and the correlation between repeated measures within an individual. (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | mEq/L (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 4.32 |
Spironolactone | 4.49 |
"Average post-baseline quality of life, taking into consideration baseline quality of life and treatment group.~The McMaster Overall Treatment Evaluation questionnaire is a self-administered 3-item instrument that measures a patient's perception of change in their health-related quality of life since the start of therapy. The questionnaire consists of a single question - Since treatment started, has there been any change in your activity limitation, symptoms and/or feelings related to your heart condition? Scores can range from -7 to +7, and higher scores reflect better health status. The questionnaire was administered at the following study visits: month 4 and month 12. Valid translations of this questionnaire were only available for subjects enrolled in the United States, Canada and Argentina." (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 1.2 |
Spironolactone | 1.2 |
"Average post-baseline quality of life, taking into consideration baseline quality of life, treatment group, the time between the post-baseline measures, and the correlation between repeated measures within an individual.~The EuroQOL visual analog scale (EQ5D) is a single-item, self-administered instrument that quantifies current health status. Scores can range from 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status. The EQ5D was administered at the following study visits: baseline, month 4, month 12 and annually thereafter." (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 65.9 |
Spironolactone | 66.4 |
"Average post-baseline quality of life, taking into consideration baseline quality of life, treatment group, the time between the post-baseline measures, and the correlation between repeated measures within an individual.~The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) is a 23-item, self-administered instrument that quantifies physical function, symptoms (frequency, severity and recent change), social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life. Scores are transformed to a range of 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status. The KCCQ was administered at the following study visits: baseline, month 4, month 12 and annually thereafter." (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 63.1 |
Spironolactone | 64.4 |
Average post-baseline serum creatinine, taking into consideration baseline serum creatinine, treatment group, the time between the post-baseline measures, and the correlation between repeated measures within an individual. (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | mg/dL (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 1.11 |
Spironolactone | 1.17 |
Average post-baseline Sodium, taking into consideration baseline Sodium, treatment group, the time between the post-baseline measures, and the correlation between repeated measures within an individual. (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | mEq/L (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 140.95 |
Spironolactone | 140.33 |
First incidence of stroke (NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | Events per 100 person-years (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 1.1 |
Spironolactone | 1.0 |
(NCT00094302)
Timeframe: Randomization through each subject's last semi-annual visit, up to a maximum of 6 years per subject.
Intervention | Events per 100 person-years (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 8.3 |
Spironolactone | 6.8 |
Adjusted ratio to baseline in geometric mean in Pro-BNP in the blood. Ratio to Baseline = On-therapy geometric mean divided by baseline geometric mean. A lower score signifies improvement. Change from baseline adjusted for baseline value and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor use at baseline. Analysis uses natural logarithms of excretion rate values. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6, Month 14
Intervention | pg/mL (Geometric Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo - Month 6 | 0.98 |
Irbesartan - Month 6 | 0.93 |
Placebo - Month 14 | 1.00 |
Irbesartan - Month 14 | 1.01 |
NYHA functional classification=4-tiered system relating symptoms to everyday activities & quality of life. (See Reporting Groups for description of each class.) Change of NYHA functional class from baseline was grouped into 3 categories: improved, unchanged, or worsened (based on case report form [CRF] assessment). If a post-randomization CRF assessment was missing or participant died, was hospitalized for worsening heart failure or discontinued study medication for worsening heart failure, the participant was classified as Major Event. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, Final Visit. The trial was designed to end after 1440 primary endpoint events, projected duration=6.0 ± 0.5 years.
Intervention | participants (Number) | |||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Month 6 - Improved | Month 6 - Unchanged | Month 6 - Worsened | Month 6 - Major Event | Month 6 - No Data | Month 10 - Improved | Month 10 - Unchanged | Month 10 - Worsened | Month 10 - Major Event | Month 10 - No Data | Month 14 - Improved | Month 14 - Unchanged | Month 14 - Worsened | Month 14 - Major Event | Month 14 - No Data | Final Visit - Improved | Final Visit - Unchanged | Final Visit - Worsened | Final Visit - Major Event | Final Visit - No Data | |
Irbesartan Baseline All Classes Combined | 936 | 966 | 48 | 10 | 107 | 948 | 911 | 58 | 41 | 109 | 933 | 866 | 61 | 75 | 132 | 928 | 658 | 97 | 324 | 60 |
Irbesartan Baseline Class I or II | 55 | 310 | 41 | 2 | 18 | 44 | 294 | 53 | 10 | 25 | 38 | 287 | 50 | 22 | 29 | 42 | 230 | 68 | 75 | 11 |
Irbesartan Class III or IV | 881 | 656 | 7 | 8 | 89 | 904 | 617 | 5 | 31 | 84 | 895 | 579 | 11 | 53 | 103 | 886 | 428 | 29 | 249 | 49 |
Placebo Baseline All Classes Combined | 881 | 1016 | 51 | 14 | 98 | 902 | 939 | 71 | 42 | 106 | 902 | 890 | 69 | 80 | 119 | 882 | 694 | 107 | 320 | 57 |
Placebo Baseline Class I or II | 47 | 338 | 47 | 2 | 11 | 42 | 317 | 63 | 9 | 14 | 39 | 312 | 62 | 16 | 16 | 42 | 254 | 78 | 66 | 5 |
Placebo Class III or IV | 834 | 678 | 4 | 12 | 87 | 860 | 622 | 8 | 33 | 92 | 863 | 578 | 7 | 64 | 103 | 840 | 440 | 29 | 254 | 52 |
Based on the Cockcroft-Gault formula calculation, a commonly used surrogate marker to estimate creatinine clearance, which in turn is an approximate measure of GFR. It employs serum creatinine measurements and a patient's weight to predict the creatinine clearance. Adjusted for baseline GFR and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor use at baseline (ACE-I). A decrease from baseline signifies worsening. The adjusted mean change from baseline value is from the model (calculated prior to rounding), whereas the other two points are the baseline mean and post mean. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6, Month 18, Month 30
Intervention | mL/min/1.73m2 (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Baseline Mean | Post-Baseline Mean | Adjusted Mean Change | |
Irbesartan - Month 18 | 73.49 | 68.00 | -5.50 |
Irbesartan - Month 30 | 74.37 | 67.05 | -7.12 |
Irbesartan - Month 6 | 73.13 | 69.21 | -3.91 |
Placebo - Month 18 | 73.58 | 70.88 | -2.69 |
Placebo - Month 30 | 73.34 | 69.51 | -4.02 |
Placebo - Month 6 | 73.02 | 71.97 | -1.07 |
Based on the Cockcroft-Gault formula calculation, a commonly used surrogate marker to estimate creatinine clearance, which in turn is an approximate measure of GFR. It employs serum creatinine measurements and a patient's weight to predict the creatinine clearance. Adjusted for baseline GFR and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor use at baseline (ACE-I). A decrease from baseline signifies worsening. The adjusted mean change from baseline value is from the model (calculated prior to rounding), whereas the other two points are the baseline mean and post mean. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 42, Month 54, Month 66
Intervention | mL/min/1.73m2 (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Baseline Mean | Post-Baseline Mean | Adjusted Mean Change | |
Irbesartan - Month 42 | 74.95 | 67.48 | -7.36 |
Irbesartan - Month 54 | 75.17 | 68.24 | -6.93 |
Irbesartan - Month 66 | 71.84 | 64.85 | -5.46 |
Placebo - Month 42 | 74.37 | 71.34 | -3.14 |
Placebo - Month 54 | 75.29 | 72.65 | -2.63 |
Placebo - Month 66 | 63.47 | 60.09 | -4.91 |
Mean score at baseline and final visit in Minnesota Living with Heart Failure (MLWHF) questionnaire, a 21-item, patient-reported, 6-point (ranging from 0-5; higher score=poorer quality of life; highest possible score=105) measurement of quality of life in persons with heart failure. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Baseline, Final Visit=last scheduled visit specified in the protocol at conclusion of the entire study by the sponsor. The trial was designed to end after 1440 primary endpoint events, projected duration=6.0 ± 0.5 years.
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Baseline Mean | Final Visit Mean | |
Irbesartan - Final Visit | 38.9 | 38.3 |
Placebo - Final Visit | 42.5 | 42.6 |
Mean score and adjusted mean change from baseline in Minnesota Living with Heart Failure (MLWHF) questionnaire, a 21-item, patient-reported, 6-point (ranging from 0-5; higher score=poorer quality of life; highest possible score=105) measurement of quality of life in persons with heart failure. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6, Month 14
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Baseline Mean Score | Mean Score at Timepoint | Adjusted Mean Change from Baseline | |
Irbesartan - Month 14 | 42.8 | 32.1 | -10.6 |
Irbesartan - Month 6 | 43.0 | 33.2 | -9.8 |
Placebo - Month 14 | 42.7 | 31.6 | -11.2 |
Placebo - Month 6 | 42.7 | 32.9 | -10.0 |
Frequency of new onset AF in participants with no prior AF history or evidence of AF on baseline ECG. Stratified by use of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and measured by adverse events reporting and final ECG recording read by the investigator. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Baseline, Final Visit
Intervention | participants (Number) | |
---|---|---|
No prior AF history or Evidence on Baseline ECG | Participants with New Onset Atrial Fibrillation | |
Irbesartan + ACE-I Use | 366 | 35 |
Irbesartan no ACE-I Use | 1089 | 103 |
Placebo + ACE-I Use | 344 | 29 |
Placebo no ACE-I Use | 1102 | 99 |
Assessments are directly based on the Case Report Form (CRF). If the post-randomization CRF assessment was missing and the subject died, was hospitalized for worsening heart failure, or discontinued study medication for worsening heart failure, the subject was considered as having a Major Event. Participants who are summarized under Major Events are categorized as Worsened Markedly. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6, Month 14, Final Visit. The trial was designed to end after 1440 primary endpoint events, projected duration=6.0 ± 0.5 years.
Intervention | Participants (Number) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Month 6 - Improved Markedly | Month 6 - Improved Moderately | Month 6 - Improved Slightly | Month 6 - Unchanged | Month 6 - Worsened Slightly | Month 6 - Worsened Moderately | Month 6 - Worsened Markedly | Month 6 - Major Event | Month 6 - No Data | Month 14 - Improved Markedly | Month 14 - Improved Moderately | Month 14 - Improved Slightly | Month 14 - Unchanged | Month 14 - Worsened Slightly | Month 14 - Worsened Moderately | Month 14 - Worsened Markedly | Month 14 - Major Event | Month 14 - No Data | Final Visit - Improved Markedly | Final Visit - Improved Moderately | Final Visit - Improved Slightly | Final Visit - Unchanged | Final Visit - Worsened Slightly | Final Visit - Worsened Moderately | Final Visit - Worsened Markedly | Final Visit - Major Event | Final Visit - No Data | |
Irbesartan | 255 | 549 | 512 | 508 | 83 | 22 | 9 | 8 | 121 | 247 | 519 | 460 | 476 | 103 | 28 | 13 | 68 | 153 | 213 | 382 | 328 | 460 | 114 | 64 | 35 | 395 | 76 |
Placebo | 276 | 536 | 501 | 510 | 83 | 22 | 10 | 7 | 116 | 232 | 531 | 430 | 509 | 90 | 39 | 10 | 74 | 146 | 212 | 339 | 335 | 461 | 145 | 75 | 32 | 384 | 78 |
Assessments are directly based on the Case Report Form (CRF). If the post-randomization CRF assessment was missing and the subject died, was hospitalized for worsening heart failure, or discontinued study medication for worsening heart failure, the subject was considered as having a Major Event. Participants who are summarized under Major Events are categorized as Worsened Markedly. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6, Month 14, Final Visit. The trial was designed to end after 1440 primary endpoint events, projected duration=6.0 ± 0.5 years.
Intervention | Participants (Number) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Month 6 - Improved Markedly | Month 6 - Improved Moderately | Month 6 - Improved Slightly | Month 6 - Unchanged | Month 6 - Worsened Slightly | Month 6 - Worsened Moderately | Month 6 - Worsened Markedly | Month 6 - Major Event | Month 6 - No Data | Month 14 - Improved Markedly | Month 14 - Improved Moderately | Month 14 - Improved Slightly | Month 14 - Unchanged | Month 14 - Worsened Slightly | Month 14 - Worsened Moderately | Month 14 - Worsened Markedly | Month 14 - Major Event | Month 14 - No Data | Final Visit - Improved Markedly | Final Visit - Improved Moderately | Final Visit - Improved Slightly | Final Visit - Unchanged | Final Visit - Worsened Slightly | Final Visit - Worsened Moderately | Final Visit - Worsened Markedly | Final Visit - Major Event | Final Visit - No Data | |
Irbesartan | 193 | 523 | 504 | 579 | 97 | 28 | 13 | 8 | 122 | 195 | 513 | 439 | 525 | 115 | 48 | 11 | 68 | 153 | 157 | 361 | 319 | 479 | 166 | 80 | 34 | 395 | 76 |
Placebo | 200 | 519 | 471 | 596 | 101 | 38 | 13 | 7 | 116 | 182 | 489 | 443 | 559 | 109 | 43 | 16 | 74 | 146 | 178 | 300 | 337 | 477 | 176 | 90 | 42 | 383 | 78 |
Assessments are directly based on the Case Report Form (CRF). If the post-randomization CRF assessment was missing and the subject died, was hospitalized for worsening heart failure, or discontinued study medication for worsening heart failure, the subject was considered as having a Major Event. Participants who are summarized under Major Events are categorized as Worsened Markedly. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6, Month 14, Final Visit. The trial was designed to end after 1440 primary endpoint events, projected duration=6.0 ± 0.5 years.
Intervention | Participants (Number) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Month 6 - Improved Markedly | Month 6 - Improved Moderately | Month 6 - Improved Slightly | Month 6 - Unchanged | Month 6 - Worsened Slightly | Month 6 - Worsened Moderately | Month 6 - Worsened Markedly | Month 6 - Major Event | Month 6 - No Data | Month 14 - Improved Markedly | Month 14 - Improved Moderately | Month 14 - Improved Slightly | Month 14 - Unchanged | Month 14 - Worsened Slightly | Month 14 - Worsened Moderately | Month 14 - Worsened Markedly | Month 14 - Major Event | Month 14 - No Data | Final Visit - Improved Markedly | Final Visit - Improved Moderately | Final Visit - Improved Slightly | Final Visit - Unchanged | Final Visit - Worsened Slightly | Final Visit - Worsened Moderately | Final Visit - Worsened Markedly | Final Visit - Major Event | Final Event - No Data | |
Irbesartan | 235 | 552 | 529 | 537 | 63 | 13 | 8 | 8 | 122 | 234 | 532 | 461 | 503 | 78 | 30 | 8 | 68 | 153 | 207 | 378 | 332 | 480 | 121 | 52 | 25 | 396 | 76 |
Placebo | 230 | 563 | 519 | 529 | 69 | 20 | 8 | 7 | 116 | 206 | 534 | 450 | 527 | 82 | 35 | 7 | 74 | 146 | 201 | 339 | 352 | 495 | 109 | 76 | 28 | 383 | 78 |
Treatment comparisons for time to all-cause death (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percentage at 1 Year | Percentage at 2 Years | Percentage at 3 Years | Percentage at 4 Years | Percentage at 5 Years | |
Irbesartan | 4.1 | 8.1 | 12.8 | 17.9 | 25.0 |
Placebo | 3.8 | 8.6 | 13.8 | 18.5 | 23.6 |
Treatment comparisons for time to cardiovascular death (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percentage 1 Year | Percentage 2 Years | Percentage 3 Years | Percentage at 4 Years | Percentage at 5 Years | |
Irbesartan | 3.3 | 6.2 | 9.6 | 13.0 | 18.0 |
Placebo | 3.0 | 6.5 | 10.0 | 13.1 | 17.1 |
Treatment comparisons for time to CV death or CV hospitalization. Protocol-specified CV hospitalizations include hospitalizations ≥24 hrs or involve a calendar date change for a primary cause of worsening heart failure, unstable angina, myocardial infarction, ventricular dysrhythmia, atrial dysrhythmia or stroke that also requires intravenous or intramuscular therapy or a related procedure or significant augmentation of oral therapy. Protocol specified CV hospitalizations also include myocardial infarction or stroke occurring during any hospitalization. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percentage at 1 Year | Percentage at 2 Years | Percentage at 3 Years | Percentage at 4 Years | Percentage at 5 Years | |
Irbesartan | 11.6 | 19.2 | 24.2 | 30.0 | 35.0 |
Placebo | 11.4 | 20.0 | 25.8 | 30.9 | 35.8 |
Treatment comparisons for time to cardiovascular death, non-fatal MI, or non-fatal stroke. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percentage at 1 Year | Percentage at 2 Years | Percentage at 3 Years | Percentage at 4 Years | Percentage at 5 Years | |
Irbesartan | 5.2 | 8.7 | 12.9 | 17.2 | 23.0 |
Placebo | 4.2 | 9.3 | 13.6 | 17.6 | 22.4 |
Treatment comparisons for time to heart failure mortality or heart failure hospitalization (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percentage at 1 Year | Percentage at 2 Years | Percentage at 3 Years | Percentage at 4 Years | Percentage at 5 Years | |
Irbesartan | 7.9 | 12.9 | 15.7 | 19.8 | 23.6 |
Placebo | 8.2 | 13.7 | 17.2 | 20.3 | 23.8 |
Treatment comparisons for time to protocol-specified CV hospitalization. Protocol-specified CV hospitalizations include hospitalizations ≥24 hrs or involve a calendar date change for a primary cause of worsening heart failure, unstable angina, myocardial infarction, ventricular dysrhythmia, atrial dysrhythmia or stroke that also requires intravenous or intramuscular therapy or a related procedure or significant augmentation of oral therapy. Protocol specified CV hospitalizations also include myocardial infarction or stroke occurring during any hospitalization. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percentage at 1 Year | Percentage at 2 Years | Percentage at 3 Years | Percentage at 4 Years | Percentage at 5 Years | |
Irbesartan | 9.7 | 16.3 | 20.5 | 24.8 | 28.5 |
Placebo | 9.8 | 17.1 | 21.7 | 25.9 | 29.0 |
Treatment comparisons for time to first occurrence of composite outcome of all-cause death (composite outcome of death) or protocol-specified CV hospitalization. Protocol-specified CV hospitalizations include those ≥24 hrs or involving a calendar date change for a primary cause of worsening heart failure, unstable angina, myocardial infarction, ventricular or atrial dysrhythmia, or stroke, that also require intravenous or intramuscular therapy or a related procedure or significant augmentation of oral therapy. In addition, MI or stroke during any hospitalization are included. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percentage at 1 Year | Percentage at 2 Years | Percentage at 3 Years | Percentage at 4 Years | Percentage at 5 Years | |
Irbesartan | 12.3 | 20.7 | 26.4 | 32.9 | 39.2 |
Placebo | 12.1 | 21.3 | 28.4 | 34.2 | 39.5 |
Treatment comparisons for time to new onset of diabetes (from adverse event reporting) among subjects with no prior history of diabetes. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percentage at 1 Year | Percentage at 2 Years | Percentage at 3 Years | Percentage at 4 Years | Percentage at 5 Years | |
Irbesartan | 0.7 | 2.1 | 3.1 | 4.6 | 5.2 |
Placebo | 1.2 | 2.8 | 3.9 | 5.4 | 6.2 |
This was an assessment of the change in overall physician opinion of change from baseline status. Assessments are directly based on the Case Report Form (CRF). If the post-randomization CRF assessment was missing and the subject died, was hospitalized for worsening heart failure, or discontinued study medication for worsening heart failure, the subject was considered as having a Major Event. Participants who are summarized under Major Events are categorized as Worsened Markedly. (NCT00095238)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6, Month 14, Final Visit. The trial was designed to end after 1440 primary endpoint events, projected duration=6.0 ± 0.5 years.
Intervention | participants (Number) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Month 6 - Improved Markedly | Month 6 - Improved Moderately | Month 6 - Improved Slightly | Month 6 - Unchanged | Month 6 - Worsened Slightly | Month 6 - Worsened Moderately | Month 6 - Worsened Markedly | Month 6 - Major Event | Month 6 - No Data | Month 14 - Improved Markedly | Month 14 - Improved Moderately | Month 14 - Improved Slightly | Month 14 - Unchanged | Month 14 - Worsened Slightly | Month 14 - Worsened Moderately | Month 14 - Worsened Markedly | Month 14 - Major Event | Month 14 - No Data | Final Visit - Improved Markedly | Final Visit - Improved Moderately | Final Visit - Improved Slightly | Final Visit - Unchanged | Final Visit - Worsened Slightly | Final Visit - Worsened Moderately | Final Visit - Worsened Markedly | Final Visit - Major Event | Final Visit - No Data | |
Irbesartan | 230 | 562 | 533 | 528 | 60 | 17 | 0 | 8 | 129 | 214 | 546 | 442 | 507 | 72 | 21 | 5 | 75 | 185 | 180 | 430 | 344 | 477 | 117 | 41 | 23 | 364 | 91 |
Placebo | 198 | 575 | 529 | 541 | 58 | 16 | 4 | 8 | 132 | 195 | 537 | 435 | 548 | 73 | 19 | 6 | 79 | 169 | 186 | 367 | 361 | 504 | 117 | 56 | 28 | 350 | 92 |
The considered event is the death over the duration of the follow-up whatever the cause, cardiovascular or non-cardiovascular. (NCT00249795)
Timeframe: Median follow-up of 4.5 years
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Irbesartan | 949 |
Placebo | 929 |
The considered event is the first overnight hospital stay for HF over the duration of the follow-up, after validation by the EAC. (NCT00249795)
Timeframe: Median follow-up of 4.5 years
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Irbesartan | 482 |
Placebo | 551 |
The considered event is the overnight hospital stay for any CV cause other than Heart Failure over the duration of follow-up, as reported by the investigator (i.e. not validated by the Event Adjudication Committee). (NCT00249795)
Timeframe: Median follow-up of 4.5 years
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Irbesartan | 1186 |
Placebo | 1174 |
The considered event is the first occurence of any HF episode defined as evidence of signs and symptoms of HF with or without hospitalization over the duration of follow-up, as reported by the investigator (i.e. not validated by the Event Adjudication Committee). (NCT00249795)
Timeframe: Median follow-up of 4.5 years
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Irbesartan | 699 |
Placebo | 767 |
The considered event is the first occurrence of stroke (nonfatal or fatal, ischemic, hemorrhagic or of uncertain type) over the duration of follow-up, after validation by the EAC. (NCT00249795)
Timeframe: Median follow-up of 4.5 years
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Irbesartan | 379 |
Placebo | 411 |
The first co-primary event is the first occurence of any component of the following cluster over the duration of follow-up: myocardial infarction (nonfatal or fatal), stroke (nonfatal or fatal) or vascular death - after validation by the Event Adjudication Committee (EAC). (NCT00249795)
Timeframe: Median follow-up of 4.5 years
Intervention | participants (Number) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
All components | - Myocardial Infarction (fatal or not) | - Stroke (fatal or not) | - Vascular death | |
Irbesartan | 963 | 136 | 367 | 460 |
Placebo | 963 | 123 | 407 | 433 |
The second co-primary event is the first occurence of any component of the following cluster over the duration of follow-up: myocardial infarction (nonfatal or fatal), stroke (nonfatal or fatal), vascular death or hospitalization for heart failure - after validation by the EAC. (NCT00249795)
Timeframe: Median follow-up of 4.5 years
Intervention | participants (Number) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
All components | - Myocardial Infarction (fatal or not) | - Stroke (fatal or not) | - Vascular death | - Hospitalization for heart failure | |
Irbesartan | 1236 | 122 | 340 | 331 | 443 |
Placebo | 1291 | 112 | 375 | 291 | 513 |
13 reviews available for avapro and Cardiac Failure
Article | Year |
---|---|
Meta-Analysis Evaluating the Effects of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Blockade on Outcomes of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.
Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotens | 2020 |
Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: Entresto a Possible Option.
Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Animals; | 2017 |
Rational of the use of aliskiren in hypertension and beyond.
Topics: Amides; Angiotensin II; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Antihypertensive Agents; Biphenyl C | 2009 |
The effect of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors on mortality and heart failure hospitalization in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphe | 2010 |
Albuminuria and blood pressure, independent targets for cardioprotective therapy in patients with diabetes and nephropathy: a post hoc analysis of the combined RENAAL and IDNT trials.
Topics: Aged; Albuminuria; Amlodipine; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Biphenyl Compounds; Blood Pressure; | 2011 |
Treatment of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: have we been pursuing the wrong paradigm?
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme | 2011 |
What have we learned about patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction from DIG-PEF, CHARM-preserved, and I-PRESERVE?
Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Cardiotonic Agents; Cli | 2012 |
[Irbesartan--antihypertensive treatment in patients with heart failure and diabetes mellitus].
Topics: Antihypertensive Agents; Biphenyl Compounds; Diabetes Complications; Heart Failure; Humans; Hyperten | 2002 |
Angiotensin-II receptor antagonists: their place in therapy.
Topics: Angiotensin II; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihype | 1999 |
[Antihypertensive advantages of angiotensin II AT1 receptor antagonism].
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Antihypertensive Age | 1999 |
[Use of angiotensin II receptor blockaders in heart failure].
Topics: Angiotensin II; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Anti-Arr | 2000 |
Apoptosis and changes in contractile protein pattern in the skeletal muscle in heart failure.
Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Animals; Apoptosis; Biphenyl Compounds; Contractile Proteins; Dise | 2001 |
Pharmacokinetics of irbesartan are not altered in special populations.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Biphenyl Compounds; Child; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypertension; Irb | 2002 |
24 trials available for avapro and Cardiac Failure
Article | Year |
---|---|
Myocardial Infarction in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Pooled Analysis of 3 Clinical Trials.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Diuretics; Double | 2020 |
Age-Related Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.
Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphe | 2019 |
Age-Related Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.
Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphe | 2019 |
Age-Related Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.
Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphe | 2019 |
Age-Related Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.
Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphe | 2019 |
Age-Related Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.
Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphe | 2019 |
Age-Related Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.
Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphe | 2019 |
Age-Related Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.
Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphe | 2019 |
Age-Related Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.
Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphe | 2019 |
Age-Related Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.
Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphe | 2019 |
Relationship between heart rate and mortality and morbidity in the irbesartan patients with heart failure and preserved systolic function trial (I-Preserve).
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Atria | 2014 |
International geographic variation in event rates in trials of heart failure with preserved and reduced ejection fraction.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds | 2015 |
Relationship between degree of left ventricular dysfunction, symptom status, and risk of embolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Biphenyl Compounds; Clopid | 2015 |
Characterization of subgroups of heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction with possible implications for prognosis and treatment response.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Biphenyl Compounds | 2015 |
Irbesartan in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting E | 2008 |
Irbesartan in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting E | 2008 |
Irbesartan in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting E | 2008 |
Irbesartan in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting E | 2008 |
Irbesartan in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting E | 2008 |
Irbesartan in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting E | 2008 |
Irbesartan in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting E | 2008 |
Irbesartan in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting E | 2008 |
Irbesartan in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting E | 2008 |
Irbesartan in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting E | 2008 |
Irbesartan in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting E | 2008 |
Irbesartan in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting E | 2008 |
Irbesartan in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting E | 2008 |
Irbesartan in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting E | 2008 |
Irbesartan in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting E | 2008 |
Irbesartan in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting E | 2008 |
Irbesartan in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting E | 2008 |
Irbesartan in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting E | 2008 |
Irbesartan in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting E | 2008 |
Irbesartan in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting E | 2008 |
Irbesartan in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting E | 2008 |
Irbesartan in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting E | 2008 |
Irbesartan in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting E | 2008 |
Irbesartan in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting E | 2008 |
Irbesartan in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting E | 2008 |
Irbesartan in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting E | 2008 |
Irbesartan in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting E | 2008 |
Irbesartan in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting E | 2008 |
Irbesartan in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting E | 2008 |
Irbesartan in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting E | 2008 |
Irbesartan in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting E | 2008 |
Irbesartan in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting E | 2008 |
Irbesartan in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting E | 2008 |
Irbesartan in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting E | 2008 |
Irbesartan in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting E | 2008 |
Irbesartan in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting E | 2008 |
[Irbasartan in patients with hart failure and preserved left-ventricular systolic function. Results of the I-PRESERVE study].
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Biphenyl Compounds; Female; Follow-Up | 2009 |
Baseline plasma NT-proBNP and clinical characteristics: results from the irbesartan in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction trial.
Topics: Aged; Biomarkers; Biphenyl Compounds; Double-Blind Method; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Internatio | 2010 |
Mode of death in patients with heart failure and a preserved ejection fraction: results from the Irbesartan in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction Study (I-Preserve) trial.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Antihypertensive Agents; Biphenyl | 2010 |
Factors associated with outcome in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: findings from the Irbesartan in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction Study (I-PRESERVE).
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Biphenyl Compounds; Female; Heart | 2011 |
Body mass index and adverse cardiovascular outcomes in heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction: results from the Irbesartan in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (I-PRESERVE) trial.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Biphenyl Compounds; Body Mass Index; Cardiovascular D | 2011 |
Irbesartan in patients with atrial fibrillation.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Atrial Fibrillation; Biphenyl Compounds; Blood Pressu | 2011 |
Prognostic value of baseline plasma amino-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide and its interactions with irbesartan treatment effects in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: findings from the I-PRESERVE trial.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Biomarkers; Biphenyl Compounds; Do | 2011 |
Prognostic value of baseline plasma amino-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide and its interactions with irbesartan treatment effects in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: findings from the I-PRESERVE trial.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Biomarkers; Biphenyl Compounds; Do | 2011 |
Prognostic value of baseline plasma amino-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide and its interactions with irbesartan treatment effects in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: findings from the I-PRESERVE trial.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Biomarkers; Biphenyl Compounds; Do | 2011 |
Prognostic value of baseline plasma amino-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide and its interactions with irbesartan treatment effects in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: findings from the I-PRESERVE trial.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Biomarkers; Biphenyl Compounds; Do | 2011 |
Relation of peripheral collagen markers to death and hospitalization in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: results of the I-PRESERVE collagen substudy.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Biomarkers; Biphenyl Compounds; Collagen; Double-Blin | 2011 |
Prevalence and significance of alterations in cardiac structure and function in patients with heart failure and a preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Biphenyl Compounds; Cohort Studies; Diastole; Echocar | 2011 |
Prevalence and significance of alterations in cardiac structure and function in patients with heart failure and a preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Biphenyl Compounds; Cohort Studies; Diastole; Echocar | 2011 |
Prevalence and significance of alterations in cardiac structure and function in patients with heart failure and a preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Biphenyl Compounds; Cohort Studies; Diastole; Echocar | 2011 |
Prevalence and significance of alterations in cardiac structure and function in patients with heart failure and a preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Biphenyl Compounds; Cohort Studies; Diastole; Echocar | 2011 |
Prevalence and significance of alterations in cardiac structure and function in patients with heart failure and a preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Biphenyl Compounds; Cohort Studies; Diastole; Echocar | 2011 |
Prevalence and significance of alterations in cardiac structure and function in patients with heart failure and a preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Biphenyl Compounds; Cohort Studies; Diastole; Echocar | 2011 |
Prevalence and significance of alterations in cardiac structure and function in patients with heart failure and a preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Biphenyl Compounds; Cohort Studies; Diastole; Echocar | 2011 |
Prevalence and significance of alterations in cardiac structure and function in patients with heart failure and a preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Biphenyl Compounds; Cohort Studies; Diastole; Echocar | 2011 |
Prevalence and significance of alterations in cardiac structure and function in patients with heart failure and a preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Biphenyl Compounds; Cohort Studies; Diastole; Echocar | 2011 |
Assessment of long-term effects of irbesartan on heart failure with preserved ejection fraction as measured by the minnesota living with heart failure questionnaire in the irbesartan in heart failure with preserved systolic function (I-PRESERVE) trial.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Biphenyl Compounds; Female; Follow-Up | 2012 |
Sex differences in clinical characteristics and outcomes in elderly patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: the Irbesartan in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (I-PRESERVE) trial.
Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Biphenyl Compounds; Chi-Square Distribut | 2012 |
Effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor plus irbesartan on maximal and submaximal exercise capacity and neurohumoral activation in patients with congestive heart failure.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Angiotensin II; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Biphenyl Comp | 2005 |
The irbesartan in heart failure with preserved systolic function (I-PRESERVE) trial: rationale and design.
Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Biomarkers; Biphenyl Compounds; Double-Blind Method; Endpoi | 2005 |
Comparison of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor alone and in combination with irbesartan for the treatment of heart failure.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Biphenyl Co | 2008 |
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: clinical characteristics of 4133 patients enrolled in the I-PRESERVE trial.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Atrial Fibrillation; Biphenyl Compounds; Body Mass In | 2008 |
Dose-related beneficial long-term hemodynamic and clinical efficacy of irbesartan in heart failure.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Antihypertensive Agents; Biphenyl Compounds; Do | 1999 |
The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of irbesartan in heart failure.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Antihyperten | 2001 |
39 other studies available for avapro and Cardiac Failure
Article | Year |
---|---|
Canagliflozin Ameliorates Ventricular Remodeling through Apelin/Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 Signaling in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction Rats.
Topics: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2; Animals; Apelin; Canagliflozin; Fibrosis; Heart Failure; Humans; Ir | 2023 |
Risk of myocardial infarction, heart failure, and cerebrovascular disease with the use of valsartan, losartan, irbesartan, and telmisartan in patients.
Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl | 2023 |
Developing and validating models to predict sudden death and pump failure death in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biomarkers; Biphenyl Compounds; Death | 2021 |
Developing and validating models to predict sudden death and pump failure death in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biomarkers; Biphenyl Compounds; Death | 2021 |
Developing and validating models to predict sudden death and pump failure death in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biomarkers; Biphenyl Compounds; Death | 2021 |
Developing and validating models to predict sudden death and pump failure death in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biomarkers; Biphenyl Compounds; Death | 2021 |
Developing and validating models to predict sudden death and pump failure death in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biomarkers; Biphenyl Compounds; Death | 2021 |
Developing and validating models to predict sudden death and pump failure death in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biomarkers; Biphenyl Compounds; Death | 2021 |
Developing and validating models to predict sudden death and pump failure death in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biomarkers; Biphenyl Compounds; Death | 2021 |
Developing and validating models to predict sudden death and pump failure death in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biomarkers; Biphenyl Compounds; Death | 2021 |
Developing and validating models to predict sudden death and pump failure death in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biomarkers; Biphenyl Compounds; Death | 2021 |
Prior Pacemaker Implantation and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds | 2019 |
Comparative effectiveness of angiotensin-receptor blockers for preventing macrovascular disease in patients with diabetes: a population-based cohort study.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Benzimidazoles; Benzoates; Biphenyl Compo | 2013 |
Exposure of cardiomyocytes to angiotensin II induces over-activation of monoamine oxidase type A: implications in heart failure.
Topics: Aldehyde Dehydrogenase; Angiotensin II; Animals; Biphenyl Compounds; Catalase; Enzyme Activation; He | 2013 |
Worsening renal function and outcome in heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction and the impact of angiotensin receptor blocker treatment.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Biphenyl Compounds; Disease Progression; Female; Glom | 2014 |
Renin-Angiotensin system blockade and worsening renal function in heart failure: an unfinished story.
Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Biphenyl Compounds; Female; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Hea | 2014 |
Regional differences in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction trials: when nephrology meets cardiology but east does not meet west.
Topics: Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Female; Fluorobenzenes; Geography; Heart Failure; Humans; Intern | 2015 |
Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With Coronary Artery Disease and Angina: Analysis of the Irbesartan in Patients With Heart Failure and Preserved Systolic Function Trial.
Topics: Aged; Angina Pectoris; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Biphenyl Compounds; Coronary Artery | 2015 |
Clinical outcomes according to QRS duration and morphology in the irbesartan in patients with heart failure and preserved systolic function (I-PRESERVE) trial.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Biphenyl Compounds; Bundle-Branch Block; Cause of Dea | 2016 |
Irbesartan for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Biphenyl Compounds; Cardiovascular Diseases; Heart Failure; | 2009 |
Irbesartan for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Anemia; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Biphenyl Compounds; Creatinine; Heart Failure; Hosp | 2009 |
Irbesartan for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Biphenyl Compounds; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Ir | 2009 |
Irbesartan for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.
Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Biphenyl Compounds; Blood Pressure; Heart Failure; Humans; | 2009 |
[The I-PRESERVE study].
Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Biphenyl Compounds; Follow-Up Studies; Heart Failure; Human | 2009 |
Response of cardiac sympathetic nerve activity to intravenous irbesartan in heart failure.
Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Animals; Baroreflex; Biphenyl Compounds; Blood Pressure; Ca | 2010 |
Comparative effectiveness of individual angiotensin receptor blockers on risk of mortality in patients with chronic heart failure.
Topics: Aged; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Chronic Disease; Confoun | 2012 |
Can brain natriuretic peptide be used to guide the management of patients with heart failure and a preserved ejection fraction? The wrong way to identify new treatments for a nonexistent disease.
Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Biphenyl Compounds; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Irbesart | 2011 |
Still at the drawing board: improving quality of life in heart failure.
Topics: Biphenyl Compounds; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Irbesartan; Male; Stroke Volume; Surveys and Ques | 2012 |
Cardioprotective effects mediated by angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockade and enhancing angiotensin 1-7 in experimental heart failure in angiotensin-converting enzyme 2-null mice.
Topics: Angiotensin I; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2; Animals; An | 2012 |
Subtle issues in model specification and estimation of marginal structural models.
Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; | 2012 |
Sustained activation of nuclear factor kappa B and activator protein 1 in chronic heart failure.
Topics: Adult; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Animals; Biphenyl | 2003 |
Cardiology patient page. Angiotensin receptor blockers.
Topics: Acrylates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Benzoates; Bip | 2003 |
Endothelial dysfunction in congestive heart failure: ACE inhibition vs. angiotensin II antagonism.
Topics: Analysis of Variance; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; An | 2004 |
Additive amelioration of left ventricular remodeling and molecular alterations by combined aldosterone and angiotensin receptor blockade after myocardial infarction.
Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Animals; Biphenyl Compounds; Blotting, Western; Collagen Ty | 2005 |
Contributions of inflammation and cardiac matrix metalloproteinase activity to cardiac failure in diabetic cardiomyopathy: the role of angiotensin type 1 receptor antagonism.
Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Animals; Biphenyl Compounds; Cardiomyopathies; Collagen Typ | 2007 |
Angiotensin II receptor blockers for the treatment of heart failure: a class effect?
Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; | 2007 |
Repression of angiotensin II and potentiation of bradykinin contribute to the synergistic effects of dual metalloprotease inhibition in heart failure.
Topics: Alanine; Angiotensin II; Animals; Biphenyl Compounds; Blood Pressure; Blood Volume; Bradykinin; Cric | 1995 |
Comparison of irbesartan with captopril effects on cardiac hypertrophy and gene expression in heart failure-prone male SHHF/Mcc-fa(cp) rats.
Topics: Angiotensin I; Angiotensin II; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhib | 1999 |
AT1-receptor antagonists for the treatment of chronic heart failure.
Topics: Angiotensin II; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Animals; | 1999 |
Effects of long-term angiotensin II AT1 receptor blockade on survival, hemodynamics and cardiac remodeling in chronic heart failure in rats.
Topics: Analysis of Variance; Angiotensin II; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Animals; Antihypertensive Ag | 1999 |
Comment on "Effects of long-term angiotensin II AT-1 receptor blockade on survival, hemodynamics and cardiac remodeling in chronic heart failure in rats".
Topics: Angiotensin II; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Animals; Antihypertensive Agents; Biphenyl Compoun | 1999 |
AT1-receptor blockers.
Topics: Angiotensin I; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Antihypertensive Agents; Biphenyl Compounds; Heart | 2000 |
Effects of angiotensin II AT1-receptor blockade on coronary dynamics, function, and structure in postischemic heart failure in rats.
Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Animals; Biphenyl Compounds; Coronary Vessels; Dose-Response Relat | 2000 |
Beneficial effects on skeletal muscle of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker irbesartan in experimental heart failure.
Topics: Angiotensin II; Animals; Apoptosis; Biphenyl Compounds; Calcium Channel Blockers; Drug Evaluation, P | 2001 |
[Choosing the dose of aprovel (irbesartan) in patients with chronic heart insufficiency].
Topics: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Biphenyl Compounds; Chronic Disease; Dose-Response Relatio | 2001 |
AT(2) receptor-mediated vasodilation in the heart: effect of myocardial infarction.
Topics: Angiotensin II; Animals; Antihypertensive Agents; Biphenyl Compounds; Cardiac Output; Coronary Circu | 2001 |
Coronary dilatation reserve in experimental hypertension and chronic heart failure: effects of blockade of the renin-angiotensin system.
Topics: Animals; Antihypertensive Agents; Biphenyl Compounds; Coronary Vessels; Gene Deletion; Heart; Heart | 2001 |