arachidonyl-2-chloroethylamide and Pain

Topics: Animals; Arachidonic Acids; Cannabinoids; Ganglia, Spinal; Gene Expression; Humans; Pain; Pain Management; Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB1; RNA, Messenger

Evidence indicates that periaqueductal gray matter (PAG) plays an important role in defensive responses and pain control. The activation of cannabinoid type-1 (CB1) or mu-opioid (MOR) receptors in the dorsal region of this structure (dPAG) inhibits fear and facilitates antinociception induced by different aversive stimuli. However, it is still unknown whether these two receptors work cooperatively in order to achieve these inhibitory actions. This study investigated the involvement and a likely interplay between CB1 and MOR receptors localized into the dPAG on the regulation of fear-like defensive responses and antinociception (evaluated in tail-flick test) evoked by dPAG chemical stimulation with N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA). Before the administration of NMDA, animals were first intra-dPAG injected with the CB1 agonist ACEA (0.5 pmol), or with the MOR agonist DAMGO (0.5 pmol) in combination with the respective antagonists AM251 (CB1 antagonist, 100 pmol) or CTOP (MOR antagonist, 1 nmol). To investigate the interplay between these receptors, microinjection of CTOP was combined with ACEA, or microinjection of AM251 was combined with DAMGO. Our results showed that both the intra-PAG treatments with ACEA or DAMGO inhibited NMDA-induced freezing expression, whereas only the treatment with DAMGO increased antinociception induced with NMDA, which are completely blocked by its respective antagonists. Interestingly, the inhibitory effects of ACEA or DAMGO on freezing was blocked by CTOP and AM251, respectively, indicating a functional interaction between these two receptors in the mediation of defensive behaviors. However, this cooperative interaction was not observed during the NMDA-induced antinociception. Our findings indicate that there is a cooperative action between the MOR and CB1 receptors within the dPAG and it is involved in the mediation of NMDA-induced defensive responses. Additionally, the MORs into the dPAG are involved in the modulation of the antinociceptive effects that follow a fear-like defense-reaction induced by dPAG chemical stimulation with NMDA.

Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Animals; Arachidonic Acids; Behavior, Animal; Cannabinoid Receptor Agonists; Cannabinoid Receptor Antagonists; Enkephalin, Ala(2)-MePhe(4)-Gly(5)-; Excitatory Amino Acid Agonists; Fear; Freezing Reaction, Cataleptic; Male; Microinjections; N-Methylaspartate; Nociception; Pain; Pain Measurement; Periaqueductal Gray; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Rats; Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB1; Receptors, Opioid, mu; Somatostatin

The medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) serves executive control functions and forms direct connections with subcortical areas such as the amygdala. Our previous work showed abnormal inhibition of mPFC pyramidal cells and hyperactivity of amygdala output neurons in an arthritis pain model. To restore mPFC activity and hence control pain-related amygdala hyperactivity this study focused on CB1 and mGluR5 receptors, which are important modulators of cortical functions. Extracellular single-unit recordings of infralimbic mPFC pyramidal cells and of amygdala output neurons in the laterocapsular division of the central nucleus (CeLC) were made in anesthetised adult male rats. mPFC neurons were classified as 'excited' or 'inhibited' based on their response to brief innocuous and noxious test stimuli. After arthritis pain induction, background activity and evoked responses of excited neurons and background activity and inhibition of inhibited neurons decreased. Stereotaxic application of an mGluR5-positive allosteric modulator (N-cyclobutyl-6-((3-fluorophenyl)ethynyl) nicotinamide hydrochloride, VU0360172) into the mPFC increased background and evoked activity of excited, but not inhibited, mPFC neurons under normal conditions but not in arthritis. A selective CB1 receptor agonist (arachidonyl-2-chloroethylamide) alone had no effect but restored the facilitatory effects of VU0360172 in the pain model. Coactivation of CB1 and mGluR5 in the mPFC inhibited the pain-related activity increase of CeLC neurons but had no effect under normal conditions. The data suggest that excited mPFC neurons are inversely linked to amygdala output (CeLC) and that CB1 can increase mGluR5 function in this subset of mPFC neurons to engage cortical control of abnormally enhanced amygdala output in pain.

Topics: Amygdala; Animals; Arachidonic Acids; Arthritis, Experimental; Cannabinoid Receptor Agonists; Evoked Potentials; Male; Niacinamide; Pain; Prefrontal Cortex; Pyramidal Cells; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB1; Receptor, Metabotropic Glutamate 5

We evaluated the pharmacology of spinal selective cannabinoid (CB) receptor agonists and a cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor on bone tumor pain. MRMT-1 tumor cells were injected into the tibia of female Sprague-Dawley rats. MRMT-1 tumor cells produced a bone tumor confirmed by radiologic and histological findings. Intrathecal CB1 (ACEA) and CB2 receptor (AM 1241) agonists and a COX-2 inhibitor (DuP 697) dose-dependently increased the withdrawal threshold. The calculated ED50 (nmol/l) values for ACEA, AM 1241 and DuP 697 were 0.007, 2.3 and 76.1, respectively. Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction and Western blot showed that COX-2 mRNA and protein, but not CB1 or CB2 receptor, were increased in the spinal cords of rats with bone tumors. Spinal CB1 receptor and CB2 receptor agonists and COX-2 inhibitor may be useful in the management of bone tumor pain. Furthermore, CB2 receptor agonist may be more potent than CB1 receptor agonist and COX-2 inhibitor.

Topics: Animals; Arachidonic Acids; Bone Neoplasms; Cannabinoid Receptor Agonists; Cannabinoids; Cell Line, Tumor; Cyclooxygenase 2; Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors; Female; Hyperalgesia; Pain; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB1; Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB2; RNA, Messenger; Spinal Cord; Thiophenes; Tibia

We investigated the effects of cannabinoid receptor agonists on (1) oral cancer cell viability in vitro and (2) oral cancer pain and tumor growth in a mouse cancer model. We utilized immunohistochemistry and Western blot to show that human oral cancer cells express CBr1 and CBr2. When treated with WIN55,212-2 (non-selective), ACEA (CBr1-selective) or AM1241 (CBr2-selective) agonists in vitro, oral cancer cell proliferation was significantly attenuated in a dose-dependent manner. In vivo, systemic administration (0.013M) of WIN55,212-2, ACEA, or AM1241 significantly attenuated cancer-induced mechanical allodynia. Tumor growth was also significantly attenuated with systemic AM1241 administration. Our findings suggest a direct role for cannabinoid mechanisms in oral cancer pain and proliferation. The systemic administration of cannabinoid receptor agonists may have important therapeutic implications wherein cannabinoid receptor agonists may reduce morbidity and mortality of oral cancer.

Topics: Analgesics; Animals; Arachidonic Acids; Benzoxazines; Blotting, Western; Cannabinoids; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Proliferation; Disease Models, Animal; Female; Fluorescent Antibody Technique; Humans; Hyperalgesia; Immunohistochemistry; Mice; Mice, Nude; Morpholines; Mouth Neoplasms; Naphthalenes; Pain; Receptors, Cannabinoid

Bone cancer pain has a strong impact on the quality of life of patients, but it is difficult to treat. Therefore, development of a novel strategy for the treatment of bone cancer pain is needed for improvement of patient quality of life. This study examined whether selective spinal cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1) activation alleviates bone cancer pain and also examined the spinal expression of CB1.. A bone cancer pain model was made by implantation of sarcoma cells into the intramedullary space of the mouse femur. In behavioral experiments, the authors examined the effects of activation of spinal CB1 and inhibition of metabolism of endocannabinoid on bone cancer-related pain behaviors. Immunohistochemical experiments examined the distribution and localization of CB1 in the superficial dorsal horn of the spinal cord using specific antibodies.. Spinal CB1 activation by exogenous administration of a CB1 agonist arachidonyl-2-chloroethylamide reduced bone cancer-related pain behaviors, including behaviors related to spontaneous pain and movement-evoked pain. In immunohistochemical experiments, although mu-opioid receptor 1 expression was reduced in the superficial dorsal horn ipsilateral to the site of implantation of sarcoma cells, CB1 expression was preserved. In addition, CB1 was mainly expressed in the axon terminals, but not in the dendritic process in the superficial dorsal horn.. Spinal CB1 activation reduced bone cancer-related pain behavior. Presynaptic inhibition may contribute to the analgesic effects of spinal CB1 activation. These findings may lead to novel strategies for the treatment of bone cancer pain.

Topics: Analgesics; Animals; Arachidonic Acids; Bone Neoplasms; Disease Models, Animal; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic; Male; Mice; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Mice, Knockout; Pain; Pain Measurement; Posterior Horn Cells; Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB1

To determine whether local administration of the cannabinoid 1 (CB(1)) receptor agonist arachidonyl-2-chloroethylamide (ACEA) can modulate joint nociception in control rat knee joints and in experimental osteoarthritis (OA).. OA was induced in male Wistar rats by intraarticular injection of 3 mg of sodium mono-iodoacetate, with a recovery period of 14 days. Electrophysiologic recordings were made of knee joint primary afferent nerve fibers in response to normal rotation and noxious hyperrotation of the joint both before and after close intraarterial injection of different doses of ACEA.. Local application of the CB(1) agonist significantly reduced the firing rate of afferent nerve fibers by up to 50% in control knee joints (n=19) and up to 62% in OA knee joints (n=29; P<0.01). Coadministration of the CB(1) receptor antagonist AM251 or the transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (TRPV-1) ion channel antagonist SB366791 significantly reduced the desensitizing effect of ACEA. The CB(1) receptor antagonist AM251 by itself had no effect in the control joint but significantly increased the firing rate of afferent nerve fibers in the OA joint.. These findings indicate that activation of peripheral CB(1) receptors reduces the mechanosensitivity of afferent nerve fibers in control and OA knee joints. Blockade of either the CB(1) receptor or the TRPV-1 channel significantly reduced the efficacy of ACEA, which suggests that both receptors are involved in cannabinoid-mediated antinociception. The increased nerve activity observed following CB(1) receptor antagonism suggests a tonic release of endocannabinoids during OA. As such, peripheral CB(1) receptors may be important targets in controlling OA pain.

Topics: Afferent Pathways; Anilides; Animals; Arachidonic Acids; Cinnamates; Knee Joint; Male; Nociceptors; Osteoarthritis, Knee; Pain; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB1; TRPV Cation Channels

Effects of locally administered agonists and antagonists for cannabinoid CB(1) and CB(2) receptors on mechanical and thermal hypersensitivity were compared after the establishment of chronic inflammation.. Carrageenan was administered unilaterally to the rat hindpaw on day 1. Prophylactic efficacy of locally administered CB(1)- and CB(2)-selective agonists -arachidonyl-2-chloroethylamide (ACEA) and (R,S)-(2-iodo-5-nitro-phenyl)-[l-(l-methyl-piperidin-2-ylmethyl)-lH-ubdik-3-yl]-methanone ((R,S)-AM1241), respectively- on mechanical and thermal hypersensitivity were compared on day 2. Pharmacological specificity was evaluated using locally administered CB(1) and CB(2)-selective antagonists -N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamidehydrochloride (SR141716A) and N-[(1S)-endo-1,3,3-trimethyl bicycle [2.2.1] heptan-2-yl]-5-(4-chloro-3-methylphenyl)-1-(4-methylbenzyl)-pyrazole-3-carboxamide (SR144528), respectively.. Administration of either ACEA or AM1241 to the inflamed but not noninflamed paw suppressed the maintenance of carrageenan-evoked mechanical hyperalgesia and tactile allodynia and attenuated thermal hyperalgesia. The ACEA-induced suppression of mechanical and thermal hypersensitivity was blocked by local injection of SR141716A but not SR144528. AM1241 suppressed mechanical hypersensitivity with the reverse pharmacological specificity. The AM1241-induced suppression of thermal hyperalgesia was blocked by SR144528 and to a lesser extent by SR14176A. Co-administration of ACEA with AM1241 in the inflamed paw increased the magnitude but not the duration of thermal antihyperalgesia compared to intraplantar administration of either agonist alone.. Cannabinoids act locally through distinct CB(1) and CB(2) mechanisms to suppress mechanical hypersensitivity after the establishment of chronic inflammation, at doses that produced modest changes in thermal hyperalgesia. Additive antihyperalgesic effects were observed following prophylactic co-administration of the CB(1)- and CB(2)-selective agonists. Our results suggest that peripheral cannabinoid antihyperalgesic actions may be exploited for treatment of inflammatory pain states.

Topics: Animals; Arachidonic Acids; Cannabinoids; Carrageenan; Chronic Disease; Drug Synergism; Hot Temperature; Hyperalgesia; Inflammation; Male; Pain; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB1; Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB2; Touch

Cannabinoid1 (CB1) receptors are located at CNS sites, including the spinal cord, involved in somatosensory processing. Analgesia is one of the tetrad of behaviors associated with cannabinoid agonists. Here, effects of a potent cannabinoid CB1 receptor agonist arachidonyl-2-chloroethylamide (ACEA) on evoked responses of dorsal horn neurons in anesthetized rats were investigated. Extracellular recordings of convergent dorsal horn neurons were made in halothane anesthetized Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 16). Effects of spinal application of ACEA on electrically evoked responses of dorsal horn neurons were studied. Mean maximal effects of 0.5, 5, 50, and 500 ng/50 microl ACEA on the C-fiber-mediated postdischarge response were 79 +/- 6, 62 +/- 10, and 54 +/- 7% (P < 0.01), 45 +/- 6% (P < 0.01), of control, respectively. ACEA (500 ng/50 microl) also reduced the C-fiber-evoked nonpotentiated responses of neurons (59 +/- 9% of control, P < 0.05) and Adelta-fiber-evoked responses of neurons (68 +/- 10% of control, P < 0.01). Minor effects of ACEA on Abeta-fiber-evoked responses were observed. Spinal pre-administration of the selective CB1 receptor antagonist SR141716A (0.01 microg/50 microl) significantly reduced effects of ACEA (500 ng/50 microl) on postdischarge responses of dorsal horn neurons. This study demonstrates that spinal CB1 receptors modulate the transmission of C- and Adelta-fiber-evoked responses in anesthetized rats; this may reflect pre- and/or postsynaptic effects of cannabinoids on nociceptive transmission. CB1 receptors inhibit synaptic release of glutamate in rat dorsolateral striatum, a similar mechanism of action may underlie the effects of ACEA on noxious evoked responses of spinal neurons reported here.

Topics: Action Potentials; Animals; Arachidonic Acids; Male; Nerve Fibers; Nerve Fibers, Myelinated; Nociceptors; Pain; Piperidines; Posterior Horn Cells; Pyrazoles; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Receptors, Cannabinoid; Receptors, Drug; Rimonabant; Spinal Cord; Synaptic Transmission