aprepitant and Uterine-Cervical-Neoplasms

Antiemetic recommendations during concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT)) have not been established yet. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the combination of palonosetron plus aprepitant, without routine use of dexamethasone, could alleviate chemoradiotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CRINV).. This was a non-randomized, prospective, single-center, open phase II study. Patients with cervical cancer, who were treated with daily low-dose cisplatin (8 mg/m(2)/day) and concurrent radiation (2 Gy/day, 25 fractions, five times a week), were enrolled in this study. All patients received intravenous palonosetron (0.75 mg on day 1 of each week) and oral aprepitant (125 mg on day 1 and 80 mg on days 2 and 3 of each week). The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients with a complete response, defined as no emetic episodes and no use of antiemetic rescue medication during the treatment.. Twenty-seven patients (median age, 50 years; range, 33-72 years) were enrolled in this study between June 2013 and April 2014. A total of 13 (48 %) patients showed a complete response to the antiemetic regimen, while 8 patients (30 %) had emetic episodes and 6 patients (22 %) used rescue medication without emetic episodes. No severe adverse effects caused by palonosetron plus aprepitant were observed.. The combination of palonosetron plus aprepitant was permissive for the prevention of CRINV. This regimen should be considered for patients in whom dexamethasone is contraindicated or not well tolerated.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aprepitant; Chemoradiotherapy; Cisplatin; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Isoquinolines; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Nausea; Palonosetron; Prospective Studies; Quinuclidines; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms; Vomiting

To assess, in a prospective, observational study, the safety and efficacy of the addition of the neurokinin-1-receptor antagonist (NK1-RA) aprepitant to concomitant radiochemotherapy, for the prophylaxis of radiation therapy-induced nausea and vomiting.. This prospective observational study compared the antiemetic efficacy of an NK1-RA (aprepitant), a 5-hydroxytryptamine-RA, and dexamethasone (aprepitant regimen) versus a 5-hydroxytryptamine-RA and dexamethasone (control regimen) in patients receiving concomitant radiochemotherapy with cisplatin at the Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Halle (Saale), Germany. The primary endpoint was complete response in the overall phase, defined as no vomiting and no use of rescue therapy in this period.. Fifty-nine patients treated with concomitant radiochemotherapy with cisplatin were included in this study. Thirty-one patients received the aprepitant regimen and 29 the control regimen. The overall complete response rates for cycles 1 and 2 were 75.9% and 64.5% for the aprepitant group and 60.7% and 54.2% for the control group, respectively. Although a 15.2% absolute difference was reached in cycle 1, a statistical significance was not detected (P=.22). Furthermore maximum nausea was 1.58 ± 1.91 in the control group and 0.73 ± 1.79 in the aprepitant group (P=.084); for the head-and-neck subset, 2.23 ± 2.13 in the control group and 0.64 ± 1.77 in the aprepitant group, respectively (P=.03).. This is the first study of an NK1-RA-containing antiemetic prophylaxis regimen in patients receiving concomitant radiochemotherapy. Although the primary endpoint was not obtained, the absolute difference of 10% in efficacy was reached, which is defined as clinically meaningful for patients by international guidelines groups. Randomized phase 3 studies are necessary to further define the potential role of an NK1-RA in this setting.

Topics: Antiemetics; Antineoplastic Agents; Aprepitant; Chemoradiotherapy; Cisplatin; Dexamethasone; Drug Therapy, Combination; Esophageal Neoplasms; Female; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Humans; Indoles; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Nausea; Neurokinin-1 Receptor Antagonists; Ondansetron; Prospective Studies; Serotonin Antagonists; Tropisetron; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms; Vomiting

Topics: Antiemetics; Aprepitant; Chemoradiotherapy; Female; Humans; Morpholines; Nausea; Pilot Projects; Prospective Studies; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms; Vomiting

Cervical cancer, an aggressive gynecological cancer, seriously threatens women's health worldwide. It is recently reported that neuropeptide substance P (SP) regulates many tumor-associated processes through neurokinin-1 receptor (NK1R). Therefore, we used cervical cancer cell line (HeLa) to investigate the functional relevance of the SP/NK1R system in cervical cancer pathogenesis.. Cellular proliferation and cytotoxicity were analyzed by colorimetric MTT assay. Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was used to measure mRNA expression levels of desired genes. Cell cycle distribution and apoptosis were evaluated by flow cytometry. A wound-healing assay was employed to assess migration ability.. We found that the truncated isoform of NK1R(NK1R-Tr) is the dominantly expressed form of the receptor in Hela cells. We also indicated that that SP increased HeLa cell proliferation while treatment with NK1R antagonist, aprepitant, inhibited HeLa cell viability in a dose and time-dependent manner. SP also alters the levels of cell cycle regulators (up-regulation of cyclin B1 along with downregulation of p21) and apoptosis-related genes (up-regulation of Bcl-2 along with downregulation of Bax) while aprepitant reversed these effects. Aprepitant also induced arrest within the G2 phase of the cell cycle and subsequent apoptosis. Furthermore, SP promoted the migrative phenotype of HeLa cells and increased MMP-2 and MMP-9 expression while aprepitant exposure significantly reversed these effects.. Collectively, our results indicate the importance of the SP / NK1R system in promoting both proliferative and migrative phenotypes of cervical cancer cells and suggest that aprepitant may be developed as a novel treatment for combating cervical cancer.

Topics: Apoptosis; Aprepitant; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Proliferation; Female; Gene Expression; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic; HeLa Cells; Humans; Matrix Metalloproteinase 2; Matrix Metalloproteinase 9; Neurokinin-1 Receptor Antagonists; Receptors, Neurokinin-1; Signal Transduction; Substance P; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms