aprepitant has been researched along with Sarcoma* in 5 studies
1 trial(s) available for aprepitant and Sarcoma
Article | Year |
---|---|
Efficacy of triplet regimen antiemetic therapy for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in bone and soft tissue sarcoma patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy, and an efficacy comparison of single-shot palonosetron and consecutive-da
The first aim of this study was to evaluate combination antiemetic therapy consisting of 5-HT3 receptor antagonists, neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists (NK-1RAs), and dexamethasone for multiple high emetogenic risk (HER) anticancer agents in bone and soft tissue sarcoma. The second aim was to compare the effectiveness of single-shot palonosetron and consecutive-day granisetron in a randomized, single-blinded crossover study. A single randomization method was used to assign eligible patients to the palonosetron or granisetron arm. Patients in the palonosetron arm received a palonosetron regimen during the first and third chemotherapy courses and a granisetron regimen during the second and fourth courses. All patients received NK-1RA and dexamethasone. Patients receiving the palonosetron regimen were administered 0.75 mg palonosetron on day 1, and patients receiving the granisetron regimen were administered 3 mg granisetron twice daily on days 1 through 5. All 24 patients in this study received at least 4 chemotherapy courses. A total of 96 courses of antiemetic therapy were evaluated. Overall, the complete response CR rate (no emetic episodes and no rescue medication use) was 34%, while the total control rate (a CR plus no nausea) was 7%. No significant differences were observed between single-shot palonosetron and consecutive-day granisetron. Antiemetic therapy with a 3-drug combination was not sufficient to control chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) during chemotherapy with multiple HER agents for bone and soft tissue sarcoma. This study also demonstrated that consecutive-day granisetron was not inferior to single-shot palonosetron for treating CINV. Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antiemetics; Antineoplastic Agents; Aprepitant; Bone Neoplasms; Cross-Over Studies; Dexamethasone; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Granisetron; Humans; Isoquinolines; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Nausea; Neurokinin-1 Receptor Antagonists; Palonosetron; Quinuclidines; Sarcoma; Serotonin 5-HT3 Receptor Antagonists; Treatment Outcome; Vomiting; Young Adult | 2015 |
4 other study(ies) available for aprepitant and Sarcoma
Article | Year |
---|---|
Population pharmacokinetic analysis reveals no impact of aprepitant on the pharmacokinetics of ifosfamide, 2-dechloroifosfamide, and 3-dechloroifosfamide.
Several case reports and retrospective series have clearly pointed to the role of aprepitant, an antiemetic drug, in the development of encephalopathy when used with ifosfamide. Described as an inhibitor of several CYP metabolic pathways, aprepitant is suspected of drug-drug-interaction on ifosfamide pharmacokinetics. The pharmacokinetics of ifosfamide and two of its metabolites (2-dechloroifosfamide and 3-dechloroifosfamide) was studied in patients with soft tissue sarcomas to evaluate the impact of aprepitant administration.. A population pharmacokinetic approach was applied to analyze data obtained in 42 patients at cycle 1 (without aprepitant) and cycle 2 (with aprepitant for 34 of them).. A previously published pharmacokinetic model including a time-dependency process well fit the data. Aprepitant had no impact on ifosfamide or its two metabolite pharmacokinetic parameters.. This study suggests that aprepitant does not lead to a significant modification of ifosfamide metabolization, even though other metabolites such as 4 hydroxyifosfamide and chloroacetaldehyde were not monitored in this study. Topics: Antiemetics; Aprepitant; Humans; Ifosfamide; Retrospective Studies; Sarcoma | 2023 |
Efficacy analysis of the aprepitant-combined antiemetic prophylaxis for non-round cell soft-tissue sarcoma patients received adriamycin and ifosfamide therapy.
Appropriate antiemetic prophylaxis for moderately emetogenic chemotherapy in patients with non-round cell soft-tissue sarcomas (NRC-STS) remains unclear. We retrospectively investigated efficacy and safety of aprepitant-combined antiemetic prophylaxis in patients with NRC-STS receiving adriamycin plus ifosfamide (AI) therapy. Forty NRC-STS patients were enrolled, their median age was 50 years (range 18-74), and 13 (32.5%) were female. Median cycle number of AI therapy was 4. Twenty patients received the doublet antiemetic prophylaxis (5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonist and dexamethasone), and 20 received triplet (5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonist, dexamethasone, and aprepitant). In the overall period, complete response rate for nausea and emesis in the triplet group was significantly higher than that in the doublet group (70% vs 35%; P = 0.027). Patients with no-emesis in the overall period were more frequently observed in the triplet group than in the doublet group (90% vs 65%; P = 0.058). All toxicities other than emesis were almost equivalent in both the groups. These results suggest that a triplet antiemetic prophylaxis may be optimal in the treatment with AI therapy for NRC-STS. Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antiemetics; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Aprepitant; Doxorubicin; Female; Humans; Ifosfamide; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Nausea; Retrospective Studies; Sarcoma; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult | 2016 |
Aprepitant-associated ifosfamide neurotoxicity.
Topics: Adult; Antidepressive Agents; Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating; Aprepitant; Case-Control Studies; Female; Humans; Ifosfamide; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Neurotoxicity Syndromes; Retrospective Studies; Sarcoma | 2010 |
Characterization of the occurrence of ifosfamide-induced neurotoxicity with concomitant aprepitant.
Ifosfamide is metabolized by the cytochrome P450 system to its active form, ifosforamide mustard. A potential side effect is neurotoxicity, often manifesting as confusion, hallucination, or seizure. Aprepitant, a neurokinin-1 inhibitor, is recommended for highly and moderately emetogenic chemotherapy regimens and may interfere with the metabolism of ifosfamide as it inhibits CYP3A4. The objective of the study is to identify if an increase in the incidence of neurotoxicity may be associated with the use of aprepitant with concomitant ifosfamide.. A retrospective study of inpatients with sarcoma who received a two or four-day regimen of MAI (mesna, doxorubicin, and ifosfamide) between January 1, 2004 and December 31, 2006 was conducted. Data collection focused on characterizing neurotoxicity of patients receiving ifosfamide with or without aprepitant. Correlation between serum creatinine, albumin, liver function tests, age, gender, and total doses of ifosfamide was examined.. A total of 45 patients received ifosfamide of which 23 (51%) were male and 24 (53%) received aprepitant. All baseline characteristics were similar for those who received aprepitant versus those who did not. No significant differences were noted between patients with or without neurotoxicity for age, gender, or liver enzymes. Eight patients (18%) of 45 developed neurotoxicity of which six (75%) of those patients also received aprepitant. A trend of increased occurrence of neurotoxicity was noted with aprepitant administration (6 vs. 2 patients respectively, p = 0.176), although a statistical difference was not observed. A relative risk of 2.6 (95% CI, 0.47-26.6) was associated with the addition of aprepitant.. An increased risk was identified for ifosfamide-induced neurotoxicity associated with aprepitant use; however, the observed difference was not statistically significant. The necessity of aprepitant given in association with ifosfamide may need to be reconsidered due to this risk. Topics: Antidotes; Antiemetics; Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating; Aprepitant; Delirium; Female; Humans; Ifosfamide; Kidney Function Tests; Liver Function Tests; Male; Methylene Blue; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Neuropsychological Tests; Neurotoxicity Syndromes; Retrospective Studies; Sarcoma | 2008 |