aprepitant and Prurigo

The aim of this multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over, phase-II study was to determine the antipruritic effect of aprepitant vs. placebo in 58 patients with anti-histamine-refractory chronic pruritus in chronic nodular prurigo. Patients were randomized to receive either first oral aprepitant 80 mg/day or placebo for 4 weeks. Following a 2-week wash-out phase, the patients were crossed-over to receive the other treatment for 4 weeks. Primary efficacy criterion was the intra-individual difference between mean itch intensity (visual analogue scale) at baseline compared with the end of treatment period. Prurigo lesions, pruritus course, quality of life, patient benefits, and safety were secondary parameters. No significant differences were found between aprepitant treatment and placebo for any of the parameters investigated. Under the experimental conditions of the study, aprepitant, 80 mg daily for 4 weeks, did not have an antipruritic effect in patients with chronic prurigo. (DRKS00005594; EudraCT Number: 2013-001601-85).

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antipruritics; Aprepitant; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Drug Resistance; Female; Germany; Histamine Antagonists; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neurokinin-1 Receptor Antagonists; Prurigo; Quality of Life; Severity of Illness Index; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Substance P (SP) and its receptor neurokinin 1 (NK1R) are thought to be involved in the pathogenesis of chronic prurigo. Here, we assessed SP serum levels, cutaneous NK1R expression, and the effects of topical aprepitant, an NK1R antagonist, in patients with chronic prurigo. SP and NK1R were increased, compared with controls, in the serum and in lesional vs. non-lesional skin of the patients, respectively. Aprepitant, in a randomized, placebo-controlled, split-sided, doubleblind trial, reduced the intensity of pruritus as assessed by visual analogue scale by >50% from baseline to day 28 (-35.2), but so did placebo vehicle (-38.1, p= 0.76). Overall clinical scores improved significantly by day 28 in both treatment groups, with no significant difference between the 2 groups (p=0.32). Our findings imply that both SP and NK1R are involved in the pathogenesis of chronic prurigo. Parallel groupdesigned trials are needed to assess the efficacy of topical aprepitant treatment in this condition.

Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Aged; Aprepitant; Case-Control Studies; Chronic Disease; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Neurokinin-1 Receptor Antagonists; Proof of Concept Study; Prospective Studies; Prurigo; Pruritus; Receptors, Neurokinin-1; Severity of Illness Index; Substance P; Visual Analog Scale