aprepitant and Kidney-Diseases

Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) and nephrotoxicity are adverse events induced by cisplatin administration. These effects can be reduced by treatment regimens with low-dose cisplatin, but high-dose cisplatin is still used. In Japan, high-dose cisplatin is usually administered in an inpatient setting to permit management of CINV. However, with use of new-generation antiemetic agents such as aprepitant, CINV and nephrotoxicity are controllable in an outpatient setting. Here, we discuss issues related to the management of high-dose cisplatin administration in outpatients. Grade 2 or worse CINV induced by high-dose cisplatin occurs in more than 40% of patients without treatment with aprepitant, but is controllable by administration of a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, steroids and aprepitant. Moreover, prevention of CINV using these drugs is cost-effective, since outpatient settings have advantages with regard to health economics and patient quality of life. These findings suggest that shifting high-dose cisplatin administration to the outpatient setting may be achieved with co-administration of aprepitant. Available facilities and the status of the patient should be considered when selecting whether an outpatient setting is suitable for administration of cisplatin, but the use of aprepitant and adequate oral hydration should allow use of cisplatin in this setting.

Topics: Antiemetics; Antineoplastic Agents; Aprepitant; Cisplatin; Fluid Therapy; Humans; Kidney; Kidney Diseases; Morpholines; Nausea; Neoplasms; Vomiting

Cisplatin is widely used chemotherapeutic drug and have some serious side effects as tissue toxicity and nausea and vomiting. Aprepitant is used in clinic as an anti-emetic drug for cisplatin treated patient to prevent nausea and vomiting. We aimed to investigate the protective effects of Aprepitant on cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity and hepatotoxicity. In total 42 male rats were separated into six groups (n = 7). A single dose of cisplatin (10 mg/kg i.p.) was administered to induce toxicity on first day. Different doses of Aprepitant (5, 10 and 20 mg/kg, p.o.) were given to treatment groups during 3 days. After the experimental procedures serum enzymes (ALT, AST, ALP, BUN and Creatinin), kidney and liver oxidative parameters (SOD, GSH and MDA), inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α and NF-κB) and Cyp2e1 expressions analyzed. Histopathological investigations also performed for all groups. Cisplatin caused tissue toxicity in both kidney and liver. Serum enzymes, tissue cytokines and oxidative stress were increased after the Cis treatment. Aprepitant treatment normalized all parameters compared to cisplatin treated group. Cisplatin significantly increased the Cyp2e1 expression in the kidney while significantly decreased in the liver compared to Healthy group. Histopathologically, it was shown that cisplatin causes a lot of abnormal structures as inflammatory infiltration and necrosis on the liver and kidney. Similar the biochemical and molecular results, aprepitant showed positive effects on tissue pathological parameters. With its main anti-emetic effect, Aprepitant treatment may be an effective option for cancer patients if they have additional injury as nephrotoxicity and hepatotoxicity due to cisplatin.

Topics: Animals; Antiemetics; Antineoplastic Agents; Aprepitant; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Cisplatin; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2E1; Kidney; Kidney Diseases; Liver; Male; NF-kappa B; Rats, Wistar; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

The neurokinin NK(1)-receptor antagonist aprepitant has demonstrated efficacy in preventing highly emetogenic chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.. The objective of the present study was to investigate the effects of impaired renal function on the pharmacokinetics and safety of aprepitant.. A total of 32 patients and healthy subjects were evaluated in this open-label, two-part study. Pharmacokinetic parameters after a single oral dose of aprepitant 240 mg were measured in eight patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring haemodialysis, eight patients with severe renal insufficiency (SRI [24-hour creatinine clearance <30 mL/min/1.73 m(2)]) and 16 healthy and age-, sex- and weight-matched subjects (controls).. In ESRD patients, the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from 0 to 48 hours (AUC(48)) for aprepitant was on average approximately 36% lower than that observed in control subjects (ratio [ESRD patients/healthy controls] of geometric means = 0.64), but the 90% confidence interval 0.52, 0.78 for the ratio of true mean AUC(48) fell within the predefined target interval of 0.5, 2.0. Also in ESRD patients, there was no statistically or clinically significant difference in unbound aprepitant AUC (which may be more clinically relevant than total aprepitant AUC) when compared with healthy control subjects. Aprepitant pharmacokinetic parameters in ESRD patients were clinically similar when haemodialysis was initiated at 4 hours or 48 hours after aprepitant administration. In SRI patients, the ratio (SRI patients/healthy controls) of aprepitant AUC from zero to infinity (AUC(infinity)) geometric mean value was 0.79 with a 90% confidence interval of 0.56, 1.10. On average, in SRI patients the principal aprepitant pharmacokinetic parameters (AUC(infinity), initial maximum plasma concentration [C(max)], time to initial C(max), and apparent elimination half-life) were not statistically different from those obtained in healthy control subjects. Aprepitant was generally well tolerated in both ESRD and SRI patients.. The results of this study demonstrate that ESRD, haemodialysis and SRI have no clinically meaningful effect on aprepitant pharmacokinetics. Therefore, no dosage adjustment of aprepitant is warranted in SRI or ESRD patients.

Topics: Adult; Antiemetics; Aprepitant; Area Under Curve; Blood Proteins; Female; Half-Life; Humans; Kidney Diseases; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Kidney Function Tests; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Neurokinin-1 Receptor Antagonists; Prospective Studies; Protein Binding; Renal Dialysis