aprepitant and Hematologic-Neoplasms

Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is a serious complication of treatments of hematological malignancies. Although aprepitant, an NK1 receptor antagonist, has been shown to control CINV in highly emetogenic therapies for solid tumors, the antiemetic effect of this agent in hematological chemotherapies is not well established. In this randomized controlled trial, we examined the additional effect of aprepitant in combination with conventional 5HT3 blocker-based prophylaxis for CINV in highly or moderately emetic chemotherapies for hematological malignancies (n = 41). The complete response rate, defined as no emetic episodes and no salvage treatments, was significantly higher in the aprepitant arm than the control arm (82 versus 47 %, p = 0.026), with no increase in severe adverse effects. However, the difference of nausea, measured with visual analog scale, and of oral intake impairment was moderate, which suggests insufficiency of blocking NK receptor for these events. Furthermore, sub-group analysis revealed that merit of aprepitant addition depends on treatment regimens. Our results indicate the overall advantage of applying aprepitant in the control of CINV in hematological malignancies and the need for further refinement of anti-CINV strategies, including stratification according to regimen.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antiemetics; Antineoplastic Agents; Aprepitant; Female; Hematologic Neoplasms; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Nausea; Neurokinin-1 Receptor Antagonists; Vomiting

Background. Aprepitant is a P/neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist approved for the prevention of CINV in moderate emetic risk chemotherapy. We explored its effectiveness in patients with leukemia receiving cytarabine-based chemotherapy. Methods. Patients were randomized to ondansetron (OND) 8 mg IV 30 minutes before cytarabine followed by 24 mg IV continuous infusion daily until 6-12 hours after the last dose of chemotherapy alone or with aprepitant (APREP) oral 125 mg 6-12 hrs before chemotherapy and 80 mg daily until 1 day after the last dose of chemotherapy. Results. Forty-nine patients were enrolled in each arm; 42 in OND and 41 in OND + APREP arm were evaluable for efficacy. The ORR with OND + APREP was 80% compared to 67% with OND alone (P = 0.11). On days 6 and 7, higher proportion of patients treated with OND + APREP were free from nausea (74%, 74% versus 68%, 67%; P = 0.27 and 0.18, resp.). Requirement of rescue medications on days 2 and 3 was fewer in OND + APREP arm 7% and 5% compared to 21% and 16% in the OND arm, respectively (P = 0.06 and P = 0.07). Conclusions. There was a trend for overall improvement in emesis with ondansetron plus aprepitant. The potential benefit of this approach with specific chemotherapy combinations remains to be determined.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Aprepitant; Cytarabine; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Hematologic Neoplasms; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Nausea; Ondansetron; Treatment Outcome; Vomiting

Uncontrolled delayed nausea and vomiting remains a problem after high-dose preparative regimens used for autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants. Recently, aprepitant was approved for highly and moderately emetogenic chemotherapy, and, in particular, is effective for decreasing delayed emesis. To evaluate its safety and efficacy in the transplantation setting, we performed a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial of aprepitant in combination with ondansetron and dexamethasone in patients treated with ablative preparative regimens. Patients were randomized to receive oral aprepitant or placebo daily with oral ondansetron and dexamethasone during and for 3 days after the completion of the preparative regimen in this prospective randomized, double-blind study. The primary objective was complete response (CR) rate, defined as no emesis with no or mild nausea. Other endpoints included number of emetic episodes, nausea severity assessed using a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS), the need for rescue antiemetics, and transplantation outcome, including regimen-related toxicity. One hundred eighty-one patients were randomized and 179 patients were eligible for analysis. Overall, CR rates were 81.9% for the aprepitant and 65.8% for the placebo arms (P < .001). Percentages of patients with no emesis all days were 73.3% for aprepitant and 22.5% placebo (P < .001). Mean VAS scores were 16.6 mm aprepitant and 16.9 mm placebo (NS), and there were no differences in the amount of rescue antiemetics used, regimen related toxicity, engraftment, or transplantation outcome. Aprepitant in combination with dexamethasone and ondansetron significantly decreased emesis and significant nausea, whereas not increasing RRT or affecting short-term survival but had no significant impact on the use of PRN antiemetics, or overall VAS nausea scores.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antiemetics; Aprepitant; Dexamethasone; Female; Hematologic Neoplasms; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Ondansetron; Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting; Prospective Studies; Severity of Illness Index; Transplantation, Autologous; Transplantation, Homologous

Genetic and laboratory studies have remodeled the conventional understanding of cancer pathogenesis by identifying different molecular alterations. Intrigued by the contribution of neurokinin-1 receptor (NK1R) network in cancer pathogenesis, we investigated the antileukemic effects of aprepitant, a nonpeptide antagonist of NK1R, in a panel of hematological cell lines. In this study, we found that aprepitant decreased the survival of all the tested cells; however, as compared with NB4, viability of the other cell lines was inhibited at higher concentrations. By increasing both p21 and p73 along with suppressing c-Myc and hTERT, aprepitant probably disordered cell distribution in the cell cycle, decreased DNA replication rate, and, thereby, impeded the proliferative capability of NB4 cells. Moreover, exposing cells to this agent led to activation of the caspase-3-dependent apoptotic pathway through altering the expression of apoptosis-related genes. Noteworthy, aprepitant also sensitized NB4 cells to the cytotoxic effects of arsenic trioxide and vincristine. Overall, it seems that pharmaceutical targeting of NK1R using aprepitant, either as a single agent or in combination, possesses novel promising potential for leukemia treatment strategies.

Topics: Aprepitant; Cell Line, Tumor; Hematologic Neoplasms; Humans; Morpholines; Neurokinin-1 Receptor Antagonists; Receptors, Neurokinin-1

High-dose melphalan has been gaining recognition as a highly emetogenic agent used in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The aim of this retrospective study was to elucidate the efficacy of aprepitant in preventing high-dose melphalan-induced emesis. Sixty patients who received melphalan (70 mg/m(2)/day, 2 days) and fludarabine (125 mg/m(2)/day, 5 days) as conditioning for allogeneic HSCT for hematological malignancies, and who received ondansetron and methylprednisolone as an antiemetic prophylaxis, were eligible. Twenty of these 60 patients also received aprepitant for 5 days (aprepitant group); the remaining 40 patients served as a control. The rates of complete response (CR), defined as no emesis without rescue medications, and complete protection (CP), defined as no emesis with or without rescue medications, were assessed between the two groups. The observation period was 12 days from the first day of melphalan administration. The CR and CP rates were significantly higher in the aprepitant group than in the control group during the observation period (35 % versus 10 %, P < 0.05; 85 % versus 33 %, P < 0.001; respectively). These results suggest that aprepitant in combination with ondansetron and steroid effectively ameliorates nausea and vomiting caused by the high-dose melphalan-based conditioning for allogeneic HSCT.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antiemetics; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Aprepitant; Female; Hematologic Neoplasms; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Male; Melphalan; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Myeloablative Agonists; Nausea; Retrospective Studies; Transplantation Conditioning; Transplantation, Homologous; Vomiting

For patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy, a 5-hydroxytryptamine 3 receptor antagonist combined with dexamethasone is a standard antiemetic therapy. Despite this prophylactic anti-emetic treatment, many patients still suffer from uncontrollable emesis. In this study, we retrospectively evaluated the antiemetic effectiveness and safety of aprepitant (a neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist) in addition to 5-HT3 antagonist in Japanese patients with hematologic malignancy receiving high-dose chemotherapy prior to autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (auto-PBSCT). Twenty-six patients received aprepitant and granisetron (the aprepitant group), whereas, 22 patients received granisetron alone (the control group). All patients received 3 mg of granisetron intravenously 30 min before chemotherapy administration. Patients in the aprepitant group additionally received 125 mg of aprepitant 60-90 min before administration of the first moderately to highly emetogenic chemotherapy. On the next day or thereafter, 80 mg of aprepitant was administered in the morning until the last administration of moderately to highly emetogenic anticancer drugs. The percentage of patients who achieved complete response (CR), defined as no emesis with only grade 1-2 nausea, in the aprepitant group was significantly higher than that in the control group (42% vs. 5%, p=0.003). Logistic regression analysis showed that non-prophylactic use of aprepitant was significantly associated with non-CR. The frequencies of adverse drug events (ADEs) were not significantly different between two groups. In conclusion, the results of this study suggest that the addition of aprepitant to granisetron can improve the antiemetic effect without increasing ADEs in patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy prior to auto-PBSCT.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antiemetics; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Aprepitant; Asian People; Female; Granisetron; Hematologic Neoplasms; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Nausea; Neurokinin-1 Receptor Antagonists; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; Vomiting; Young Adult

Antiemetic effectiveness and safety of aprepitant in patients with hematologic malignancy receiving multiday chemotherapy were evaluated.. All data were retrospectively collected from the Kyushu University Hospital's electronic medical record system. Patients age 20 years or older with hematologic malignancies who received multiday chemotherapy were included in the study. All patients received 3 mg of granisetron i.v. 30 minutes before chemotherapy administration. Patients in the aprepitant group received 125 mg of aprepitant orally 60-90 minutes before administration of the first moderately to highly emetogenic chemotherapy (day 1). On day 2 or thereafter, an 80-mg oral dose of aprepitant was administered in the morning for up to five days. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients who achieved complete response (CR).. A total of 42 patients were treated with aprepitant and granisetron as antiemetic prophylaxis between April and December 2010 (aprepitant group), and 40 patients were treated with only granisetron between March 1, 2009, and March 31, 2010, before the introduction of aprepitant. The percentage of patients who achieved CR in the aprepitant group was significantly higher than that in the control group (p = 0.01). Factors that were significantly associated with non-CR included the prophylactic use of aprepitant and chemotherapies containing ≥4 g/m(2)/day of cytarabine. The rates of adverse drug events (ADEs) did not significantly differ between groups.. The addition of aprepitant to granisetron increased the antiemetic effect without influencing ADEs in patients treated with moderately to highly emetogenic multiday chemotherapy for hematologic malignancies.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Antiemetics; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Aprepitant; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Granisetron; Hematologic Neoplasms; Hospitals, University; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Nausea; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; Vomiting; Young Adult