amphotericin-b and Gram-Positive-Bacterial-Infections

The efficacy and toxicity of teicoplanin and vancomycin in the initial empirical antibiotic regimen in febrile, neutropenic patients with hematologic malignancies were compared in a prospective, randomized, unblinded, multicenter trial in the setting of 29 hematologic units in tertiary-care or university hospitals. A total of 635 consecutive febrile patients with hematologic malignancies and chemotherapy-induced neutropenia were randomly assigned to receive intravenously amikacin plus ceftazidime plus either teicoplanin at 6 mg/kg of body weight once daily or vancomycin at 1 g twice daily. An efficacy analysis was done for 527 evaluable patients: 275 treated with teicoplanin and 252 treated with vancomycin. Overall, successful outcomes were recorded for 78% of patients who received teicoplanin and 75% of those who were randomized to vancomycin (difference, 3%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -10 to 4%; P = 0.33). A total of 102 patients presented with primary, single-agent, gram-positive bacteremia. Coagulase-negative staphylococci accounted for 42%, Staphylococcus aureus accounted for 27%, and streptococci accounted for 21% of all gram-positive blood isolates. The overall responses to therapy of gram-positive bacteremias were 92 and 87% for teicoplanin and vancomycin, respectively (difference, 5%; CI, -17 to 6%; P = 0.22). Side effects, mainly represented by skin rash, occurred in 3.2 and 8% of teicoplanin- and vancomycin-treated patients, respectively (difference, -4.8%; CI, 0.7 to 8%; P = 0.03); the rate of nephrotoxicity was 1.4 and 0.8% for the teicoplanin and vancomycin groups, respectively (difference, 0.6%; CI, -2 to 1%; P = 0.68). Further infections were caused by gram-positive organisms in two patients (0.7%) treated with teicoplanin and one patient (0.4%) who received vancomycin (difference, 0.3%; CI, -0.9 to 1.0%; P = 0.53). Overall mortalities were 8.5 and 11% for teicoplanin- and vancomycin-treated patients, respectively (difference, -2.5%; CI, - 2 to 7%; P = 0.43); death was caused by primary gram-positive infections in three patients (1%) in each treatment group. When used for initial empirical antibiotic therapy in febrile, neutropenic patients, teicoplanin was at least as efficacious as vancomycin, but it was associated with fewer side effects.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Amikacin; Amphotericin B; Bacteremia; Ceftazidime; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fever; Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections; Hematologic Diseases; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Neutropenia; Prospective Studies; Teicoplanin; Vancomycin

The effect of a combination regimen using norfloxacin (NFLX) and amphotericin B (AMPH-B) for prevention of infections in patients with acute leukemia being treated by remission-induction chemotherapy in a randomized, controlled trial was studied. One hundred and six consecutive, evaluable patients were randomly assigned to receive orally 200 mg of norfloxacin two or four times daily and 200 mg of amphotericin B four times daily, or amphotericin B only. A smaller percentage of patients with bacteriologically-documented infections was observed in the study group compared with the control group (34.6% vs 56.9%; P < 0.05). The mean number of days that the patients received empirical antibiotic therapy was shorter in the study group (23 days vs 30 days; P < 0.05). The percentage of patients with a gram-negative bacterial infection (9.6% vs 27.5%; P < 0.05) or a fungal infection (17.3% vs 37.3%; P < 0.05) was decreased in the study group. This new combination antimicrobial regimen is safe and effective for prevention of gram-negative bacterial as well as fungal infections in patients with acute leukemia being treated with cytotoxic remission-induction chemotherapy.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Amphotericin B; Antineoplastic Agents; Bacterial Infections; Drug Combinations; Female; Fever; Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections; Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections; Humans; Leukemia; Male; Middle Aged; Mycoses; Norfloxacin

Bloodstream infection (BSI) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a well-known complication during the pre-engraftment phase. Knowledge of trends in etiology and antibiotic susceptibility of BSI is important as the time to effective antibiotic treatment is closely associated with survival in bacteremic patients with septic shock.. BSI during the pre-engraftment phase was studied retrospectively in 521 patients undergoing HSCT at our center in 2001-2008. Incidence, risk factors, outcome, and microbiology findings were investigated and compared with BSI in a cohort transplanted during 1975-1996.. The incidence of at least 1 episode of BSI was 21%, the total attributable mortality of BSI was 3.3%, and crude mortality at day 120 after transplantation was 21%. The rate of gram-positive and gram-negative BSI was 80% and 13%, respectively. Gram-negative BSI was more frequent both in 2001-2004 and in 2005-2008 compared with 1986-1996 (P = 0.023 for 2001-2004, P = 0.001 for 2005-2008), with fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli as the predominant finding. BSI with viridans streptococci and E. coli occurred significantly earlier after HSCT than BSI with Enterococcus species, with median time of 4, 8, and 11 days, respectively (P < 0.01 both for viridians streptococci vs. Enterococcus species, and E. coli vs. Enterococcus species). Risk factors for BSI in multivariate analysis were transplantation from unrelated donor and cord blood as stem cell source, whereas peripheral blood as stem cell source was protective.. Despite low attributable mortality of BSI, crude mortality at day 120 after transplantation was 21%, indicating an association between BSI and other risk factors for death. The risk of gram-negative BSI increased over time in parallel with an increased rate of quinolone resistance. However, the incidence and attributable mortality of gram-negative BSI remained low. Thus, prophylaxis with ciprofloxacin is still deemed appropriate, but continued assessments of the risk and benefits of fluoroquinolone prophylaxis must be performed.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Amphotericin B; Anti-Infective Agents; Bacteremia; Candidiasis; Child; Child, Preschool; Ciprofloxacin; Cohort Studies; Enterococcus; Female; Fluconazole; Fungemia; Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections; Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Incidence; Infant; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Neutropenia; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Staphylococcal Infections; Streptococcal Infections; Time Factors; Transplantation, Homologous; Viridans Streptococci; Young Adult

Systemic Candidia infections are of major concern in neonates, especially in those with risk factors such as longer use of broad spectrum antibiotics. Recent studies showed that also term babies with underlying gastrointestinal or urinary tract abnormalities are much more prone to systemic Candida infection. We report a very rare case of candidiasis caused by Candida kefyr in a term neonate.. Renal agenesis on the left side was diagnosed antenatally and anal atresia postnatally. Moreover, a vesico-ureteral-reflux (VUR) grade V was detected by cystography. The first surgical procedure, creating a protective colostoma, was uneventful. Afterwards our patient developed urosepsis caused by Enterococcus faecalis and was treated with piperacillin. The child improved initially, but deteriorated again. A further urine analysis revealed Candida kefyr in a significant number. As antibiotic resistance data about this non-albicans Candida species are limited, we started liposomal amphotericin B (AMB), but later changed to fluconazole after receiving the antibiogram. Candiduria persisted and abdominal imaging showed a Candida pyelonephritis. Since high grade reflux was prevalent we instilled AMB into the child's bladder as a therapeutic approach. While undergoing surgery (creating a neo-rectum) a recto-vesical fistula could be shown and subsequently was resected. The child recovered completely under systemic fluconazole therapy over 3 months.. Candidiasis is still of major concern in neonates with accompanying risk factors. As clinicians are confronted with an increasing number of non-albicans Candida species, knowledge about these pathogens and their sensitivities is of major importance.

Topics: Amphotericin B; Antifungal Agents; Anus, Imperforate; Candida; Candidiasis; Congenital Abnormalities; Enterococcus faecalis; Fluconazole; Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Kidney; Kidney Diseases; Sepsis; Treatment Outcome; Urinary Tract Infections; Urine; Vesico-Ureteral Reflux

Topics: Amphotericin B; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Antifungal Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Combined Modality Therapy; Cytarabine; Digestive System Surgical Procedures; Enterococcus faecium; Fatal Outcome; Female; Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections; Humans; Idarubicin; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute; Middle Aged; Mucormycosis; Neutropenia; Rhinitis; Shock, Septic; Sinusitis; Typhlitis

Topics: Abdomen, Acute; Adult; Amphotericin B; Amyloidosis, Familial; Antifungal Agents; Ascomycota; Brain Abscess; Cefazolin; Coma; Combined Modality Therapy; Craniotomy; Drainage; Enterococcus faecalis; Fatal Outcome; Female; Frontal Lobe; Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections; Humans; Immunocompromised Host; Liver Transplantation; Postoperative Complications; Pseudomonas Infections; Reoperation; Spain

To measure the prevalence of megabacteria in budgerigar-breeding colonies and to evaluate possible methods to reduce the prevalence.. A monitoring study over several years.. Two budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus) colonies with over 300 birds each.. The prevalence of megabacteria in the faeces in two budgerigar breeding colonies, colony 1 and 2, was determined by faecal examination of each bird. Following an initial survey (1990), most of the birds that were scored 2+ or more were culled and a management practice was implemented to discriminate against positive birds. Consecutive yearly surveys (1991, 1992) were conducted on the young birds bred in these colonies. The prevalence of megabacteria in colony 2 was also evaluated in 1994 and 1996 after all the birds were treated with amphotericin B administered in drinking water.. The prevalence of megabacteria in the two colonies was significantly (P < 0.001) different. Overall the prevalence of megabacteria adjusted for colony differences was significantly higher (P < 0.025) in males compared to females. Age was not an influencing factor. After the initial survey, the prevalence in the offspring did not significantly (P > 0.05) decrease in the following two annual breeding seasons but by inference it did significantly decrease after amphotericin B treatment.. The practice of culling most birds with more megabacteria in faeces and discriminating against positive birds when selecting birds for breeding or culling birds on show quality does not decrease megabacteria prevalence in the offspring. However, a reduction in prevalence does occur with administration of amphotericin B. Birds may have amphotericin B-resistant organisms and these birds need to be identified and culled.

Topics: Amphotericin B; Animals; Antifungal Agents; Bird Diseases; Cohort Studies; Feces; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections; Gram-Positive Rods; Male; Parrots; Prevalence

Sixty four episodes of bacteraemia that appeared during antimicrobial prophylaxis with an oral quinolone plus an azole in neutropenic cancer patients were compared with 128 cases of bacteraemia in a cohort of controls matched for age, sex, underlying disease, neutropenia and vascular catheter in situ to assess differences in aetiology, cost of therapy and outcome. Patients who received prophylaxis had breakthrough bacteraemias of a different aetiology compared with the control group: they had significantly fewer multiply-resistant strains (21.9 vs. 51.5, P < 0.04) and a longer afebrile neutropenic period (9.55 days vs. 4.1, P < 0.001). Patients who received prophylaxis also had bacteraemias that were significantly more frequently caused by viridans streptococci (9.4%, vs. 1.7%, P < 0.01), enterococci (15.6% vs. 7.2%, P < 0.05) and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (17.2% vs. 3.4%, P < 0.01). The cost of antimicrobial therapy per case (37401 SKK (1091 USD) vs. 31808 SKK (899 USD), P < 0.05) was also significantly higher in cases than controls; however, the number of administered antibiotics (4.18 vs. 3.21 per case, P = NS) was similar in both groups. There were no differences in outcome between both groups. However patients who received prophylaxis had significantly longer periods of afebrile neutropenia (9.55 days vs. 4.1, P < 0.001) and bacteraemia developed later than in controls. Also, the incidence of polymicrobial bacteraemia caused by multiresistant strains was lower among cases (21.9 vs. 51.5, P < 0.04).

Topics: Amikacin; Amphotericin B; Antibiotic Prophylaxis; Bacteremia; Bacterial Infections; Case-Control Studies; Catheters, Indwelling; Ceftazidime; Drug Therapy, Combination; Enterococcus; Female; Fluconazole; Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections; Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections; Humans; Male; Neoplasms; Neutropenia; Ofloxacin; Retrospective Studies; Streptococcal Infections; Treatment Outcome; Vancomycin; Xanthomonas