amphetamine has been researched along with ADDH in 240 studies
Amphetamine: A powerful central nervous system stimulant and sympathomimetic. Amphetamine has multiple mechanisms of action including blocking uptake of adrenergics and dopamine, stimulation of release of monamines, and inhibiting monoamine oxidase. Amphetamine is also a drug of abuse and a psychotomimetic. The l- and the d,l-forms are included here. The l-form has less central nervous system activity but stronger cardiovascular effects. The d-form is DEXTROAMPHETAMINE.
1-phenylpropan-2-amine : A primary amine that is isopropylamine in which a hydrogen attached to one of the methyl groups has been replaced by a phenyl group.
amphetamine : A racemate comprising equimolar amounts of (R)-amphetamine (also known as levamphetamine or levoamphetamine) and (S)-amphetamine (also known as dexamfetamine or dextroamphetamine.
Excerpt | Relevance | Reference |
---|---|---|
"Three aspects of cocaine abuse vulnerability were assessed in adulthood after discontinuing adolescent treatments: acquisition rate and dose-related responding under fixed (FR) and progressive (PR) ratio schedules." | 5.43 | Adolescent d-amphetamine treatment in a rodent model of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: impact on cocaine abuse vulnerability in adulthood. ( Dwoskin, LP; Jordan, CJ; Kantak, KM; Lemay, C, 2016) |
"Schizophrenia is characterized by severe abnormalities in cognition, including disordered attention." | 5.32 | Phencyclidine exacerbates attentional deficits in a neurodevelopmental rat model of schizophrenia. ( Grottick, AJ; Higgins, GA; Le Pen, G; Moreau, JL, 2003) |
" Women who received amphetamine-dextroamphetamine or methylphenidate monotherapy in the first half of pregnancy were compared with unexposed women." | 3.85 | Placental Complications Associated With Psychostimulant Use in Pregnancy. ( Bateman, BT; Cohen, JM; Desai, RJ; Gray, KJ; Hernández-Díaz, S; Huybrechts, KF; Mogun, H; Park, Y; Patorno, E, 2017) |
" The primary objective of the current study was to assess differences in blood pressure and heart rate before and after induction of anesthesia between patients on chronic amphetamine or methylphenidate therapy who receive their normal dose preoperatively compared to patients in whom the prescribed medication was withheld." | 3.85 | Hemodynamic profile and behavioral characteristics during induction of anesthesia in pediatric patients with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. ( Cartabuke, RS; Rice, J; Tobias, JD; Tumin, D, 2017) |
"Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is comorbid with cocaine abuse." | 3.83 | Adolescent D-amphetamine treatment in a rodent model of ADHD: Pro-cognitive effects in adolescence without an impact on cocaine cue reactivity in adulthood. ( Dwoskin, LP; Jordan, CJ; Kantak, KM; Taylor, DM, 2016) |
"To retrospectively examine response to stimulant treatment in patients with epilepsy and ADHD symptoms as predicted by seizure freedom for six months, use of methylphenidate (MPH) versus amphetamine (AMP) preparations, cognitive level, and medical records were searched for patients under the age of 18 with epilepsy and ADHD symptoms treated with MPH or AMP (n=36, age=10." | 3.80 | Comparing stimulant effects in youth with ADHD symptoms and epilepsy. ( Azeem, MW; Biederman, J; Bourgeois, B; Gonzalez-Heydrich, J; Gumlak, S; Hickory, M; Hsin, O; Kimball, K; Mezzacappa, E; Mrakotsky, C; Rober, A; Torres, A, 2014) |
" GFAP-DNSynCAM1 mice also display high levels of basal activity in the dark period (the rodent's awake/active time) that are attenuated by the psychostimulant D,L-amphetamine, and reduced anxiety levels in response to both avoidable and unavoidable provoking stimuli." | 3.78 | Astrocyte-specific disruption of SynCAM1 signaling results in ADHD-like behavioral manifestations. ( Alderman, Z; Corfas, G; Ojeda, SR; Raber, J; Sandau, US, 2012) |
" Here we dissect the components of dopaminergic neurotransmission in the hyperactive mouse mutant coloboma to identify pre- and postsynaptic elements essential for the effects of amphetamine in these mice." | 3.74 | D2-like dopamine receptors mediate the response to amphetamine in a mouse model of ADHD. ( Fan, X; Hess, EJ, 2007) |
"25 mg, the pharmacokinetic profile of plasma d-amphetamine and l-amphetamine was generally consistent among participants." | 3.11 | Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of SHP465 Mixed Amphetamine Salts After Administration of Multiple Daily Doses in Children Aged 4-5 Years with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. ( Ilic, K; Kugler, AR; McNamara, N; Yan, B, 2022) |
" It is important that future research addresses the current weaknesses in this area, which include small sample sizes, variability of selection criteria, variability of the type and dosage of supplementation, and short follow-up times." | 3.01 | Polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children and adolescents. ( Gillies, D; Leach, MJ; Perez Algorta, G, 2023) |
" Safety assessments included vital signs and adverse events (AEs)." | 2.90 | Early-Onset Efficacy and Safety Pilot Study of Amphetamine Extended-Release Oral Suspension in the Treatment of Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. ( Childress, AC; Herman, BK; Kando, JC; King, TR; Pardo, A, 2019) |
" Safety was assessed measuring adverse events (AEs) and vital signs." | 2.87 | Efficacy and Safety of Amphetamine Extended-Release Oral Suspension in Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. ( Belden, HW; Berry, SA; Brams, MN; Childress, AC; Pincus, Y; Turnbow, JM; Wigal, SB, 2018) |
" Treatment-emergent adverse events reported (>5%) with SHP465 MAS were decreased appetite, dry mouth, insomnia, headache, anxiety, initial insomnia, irritability, and bruxism." | 2.84 | Efficacy and Safety of SHP465 Mixed Amphetamine Salts in the Treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Adults: Results of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Forced-Dose Clinical Study. ( Arnold, V; Greenbaum, M; Jaffee, M; Robertson, B; Weisler, RH; Yan, B; Yu, M, 2017) |
" The pharmacokinetic profiles of d- and l-AMP were comparable across treatment groups." | 2.84 | A Randomized Phase I Study to Assess the Effect of Alcohol on the Pharmacokinetics of an Extended-release Orally Disintegrating Tablet Formulation of Amphetamine in Healthy Adults. ( Adcock, S; McMahen, R; Newcorn, JH; Sikes, C; Stark, JG, 2017) |
" When AMP XR-ODT was administered with food, there was a slight decrease in the d-and l-amphetamine Cmax and approximately a 2-hour delay in Tmax." | 2.82 | A randomized crossover study to assess the pharmacokinetics of a novel amphetamine extended-release orally disintegrating tablet in healthy adults. ( Engelking, D; McMahen, R; Sikes, C; Stark, JG, 2016) |
" Safety assessments included physical examination, chemistry, hematology, vital signs, and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs)." | 2.80 | The Efficacy and Safety of Evekeo, Racemic Amphetamine Sulfate, for Treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Symptoms: A Multicenter, Dose-Optimized, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Crossover Laboratory Classroom Study. ( Brams, M; Childress, AC; Cutler, AJ; Kollins, SH; Northcutt, J; Padilla, A; Turnbow, JM, 2015) |
"Safety assessments included adverse events (AEs), vital signs, physical examination, clinical laboratory tests, the Pediatric Daytime Sleepiness Scale, and the Pittsburgh Side Effects Rating Scale." | 2.74 | Safety and effectiveness of coadministration of guanfacine extended release and psychostimulants in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. ( Ginsberg, LD; Greenbaum, M; Murphy, WR; Spencer, TJ, 2009) |
"Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate is a therapeutically inactive prodrug in which d-amphetamine is covalently bound to l-lysine, a naturally occurring amino acid." | 2.73 | Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate and mixed amphetamine salts extended-release in children with ADHD: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover analog classroom study. ( Biederman, J; Boellner, SW; Childress, A; Krishnan, S; Lopez, FA; Zhang, Y, 2007) |
" Adverse events consisted primarily of pharmacologically (noradrenergic) expected effects." | 2.73 | Long-term, open-label safety and efficacy of atomoxetine in adults with ADHD: final report of a 4-year study. ( Adler, LA; Michelson, D; Moore, RJ; Spencer, TJ; Williams, DW, 2008) |
"Amphetamine was clearly superior to placebo in reducing inattention, hyperactivity, and other disruptive behavior problems and tended to lead to improved results on the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children--Revised." | 2.68 | Long-term stimulant treatment of children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder symptoms. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. ( Eidevall-Wallin, L; Gillberg, C; Gustafsson, P; Hägglöf, B; Janols, LO; Kopp, S; Melander, H; Thernlund, G; von Knorring, AL, 1997) |
"Methylphenidate derivatives were associated with a significantly decreased risk of irritability compared to placebo (risk ratio [RR] = 0." | 2.55 | Risk of Irritability With Psychostimulant Treatment in Children With ADHD: A Meta-Analysis. ( Bloch, MH; Cohen, SC; Coughlin, CG; Ferracioli-Oda, E; Leckman, JF; Mulqueen, JM; Stuckelman, ZD, 2017) |
"Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) is a long-acting d-amphetamine prodrug used to treat attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children, adolescents and adults." | 2.53 | Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate: Prodrug Delivery, Amphetamine Exposure and Duration of Efficacy. ( Ermer, JC; Frick, G; Pennick, M, 2016) |
" Deviations from suggested routes of administration such as crushing, chewing, intravenous administration, or snorting stimulant medication may alter the release rate, absorption, and bioavailability of the active drug." | 2.53 | Safety and efficacy considerations due to misuse of extended-release formulations of stimulant medications. ( Jain, R; Stark, JG, 2016) |
"Clinical practice currently restricts the use of psychostimulant medications in children with tics or a family history of tics for fear that tics will develop or worsen as a side effect of treatment." | 2.52 | Meta-Analysis: Risk of Tics Associated With Psychostimulant Use in Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trials. ( Bloch, MH; Cohen, SC; Coughlin, CG; Ferracioli-Oda, E; Leckman, JF; Mulqueen, JM; Stuckelman, ZD, 2015) |
"Amphetamine was discovered over 100 years ago." | 2.49 | Amphetamine, past and present--a pharmacological and clinical perspective. ( Gosden, J; Heal, DJ; Nutt, DJ; Smith, SL, 2013) |
" In seeking to optimize individual response and outcomes to stimulant therapy, important considerations include the selection of stimulant class, the choice of long- or short-acting stimulant formulations, addressing effectively any emergent adverse effects and strategies aimed at enhancing adherence to dosing regimen and persistence on therapy." | 2.48 | Amfetamine and methylphenidate medications for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: complementary treatment options. ( Coghill, D; Hechtman, L; Hodgkins, P; Shaw, M, 2012) |
" Unfortunately, results of current ADHD pharmacogenetic studies have not been entirely consistent, possibly due to differences in study design, medication dosing regimens and outcome measures." | 2.46 | Progress and promise of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder pharmacogenetics. ( Froehlich, TE; McGough, JJ; Stein, MA, 2010) |
" They are generally safe in special populations." | 2.45 | Safety of stimulant treatment in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: Part I. ( Kuchibhatla, A; Merkel, RL, 2009) |
"d-Amphetamine has a mechanism independent of neuronal firing rate, displacing intraneuronal stores of catecholamines, delaying their reuptake and inhibiting catabolism by monoamine oxidase." | 2.45 | The neuropharmacology of ADHD drugs in vivo: insights on efficacy and safety. ( Cheetham, SC; Heal, DJ; Smith, SL, 2009) |
" Overall, there is concern about risk for slowed growth in young patients who are dosed continuously, and for substance abuse in patients first medicated in late adolescence or adulthood." | 2.45 | Potential adverse effects of amphetamine treatment on brain and behavior: a review. ( Berman, SM; Kuczenski, R; London, ED; McCracken, JT, 2009) |
"Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in persons over 3 years of age and narcolepsy; methamphetamine is approved for the treatment of ADHD in persons 6 years of age and older and for short-term treatment of obesity." | 2.43 | NTP-CERHR monograph on the potential human reproductive and developmental effects of amphetamines. ( , 2005) |
"Amphetamine salts have been helpful in treating bipolar children with comorbid ADHD, but no data are available on treating comorbid depression in bipolar children." | 2.43 | Recognizing and managing bipolar disorder in children. ( Wozniak, J, 2005) |
"Amphetamine (AMPH), mainly used in the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and narcolepsy, has weight loss properties, although with detrimental cardiovascular effects." | 1.56 | A Sympathetic Treatment for Obesity. ( Diano, S; Kim, JD, 2020) |
"Amphetamine is an illicit central nervous system stimulant that is also used for the treatment of attention-decific/hyperacticity disorder (ADHD)." | 1.56 | [Harmonized measurement and reporting of chiral amphetamine in the follow-up of ADHD treatment]. ( Helander, A; Villen, T; Widing, E, 2020) |
"Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder is a pervasive developmental disorder characterized by inattention, impulsivity, and hyperactivity and is 75-90% heritable." | 1.51 | Knockout of latrophilin-3 in Sprague-Dawley rats causes hyperactivity, hyper-reactivity, under-response to amphetamine, and disrupted dopamine markers. ( Hu, YC; Hufgard, JR; Pitzer, EM; Regan, SL; Sugimoto, C; Vorhees, CV; Williams, MT, 2019) |
"Amphetamine use was associated with a greater risk of psychosis than methylphenidate." | 1.51 | Psychosis with Methylphenidate or Amphetamine in Patients with ADHD. ( Castro, VM; Hsu, J; Moran, LV; Ongur, D; Perlis, RH; Schneeweiss, S, 2019) |
"Methylphenidate was also found to produce activation of the cortical EEG in anaesthetised rats." | 1.46 | Effect of methylphenidate on visual responses in the superior colliculus in the anaesthetised rat: Role of cortical activation. ( Dommett, EJ; Haensel, JX; Hetherington, L; Overton, PG; Riley, TB; Turner, AC, 2017) |
"Three aspects of cocaine abuse vulnerability were assessed in adulthood after discontinuing adolescent treatments: acquisition rate and dose-related responding under fixed (FR) and progressive (PR) ratio schedules." | 1.43 | Adolescent d-amphetamine treatment in a rodent model of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: impact on cocaine abuse vulnerability in adulthood. ( Dwoskin, LP; Jordan, CJ; Kantak, KM; Lemay, C, 2016) |
"Methylphenidate was used by 88 % of drug users." | 1.43 | Use of drugs for ADHD among adults-a multinational study among 15.8 million adults in the Nordic countries. ( Bahmanyar, S; Furu, K; Karlstad, Ø; Kieler, H; Martikainen, JE; Pottegård, A; Zoëga, H, 2016) |
" Patterns of medication selection and dosing were compared with CMAP guidelines." | 1.40 | Treatment receipt and outcomes from a clinic employing the attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder treatment guideline of the children's medication algorithm project. ( McLennan, JD; Vallerand, IA; Wagner, DJ, 2014) |
" The dose-response curves were, however, different for the different behaviors." | 1.37 | Impulsiveness, overactivity, and poorer sustained attention improve by chronic treatment with low doses of l-amphetamine in an animal model of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). ( Sagvolden, T, 2011) |
"To develop a descriptive profile of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) pharmacological treatment patterns in terms of persistence, adherence, augmentation, switching, and dosing changes; and to assess differences in treatment patterns with regard to ADHD medication type, class, and duration of action." | 1.36 | Pharmacological treatment patterns among patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: retrospective claims-based analysis of a managed care population. ( Christensen, L; Harley, C; Hodgkins, P; Sasané, R; Tetali, S, 2010) |
"Among children with ADHD who continue stimulants through the first 3 months of treatment, dosing in the community treatment of ADHD tends to be lower than doses used in clinical trials." | 1.35 | Stimulant dosing for children with ADHD: a medical claims analysis. ( Marcus, S; Olfson, M; Wan, G, 2009) |
"Safety concerns about central nervous system stimulants for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) include adverse cardiac effects." | 1.35 | Cardiac safety of methylphenidate versus amphetamine salts in the treatment of ADHD. ( Gerhard, T; Saidi, A; Shuster, J; Winterstein, AG, 2009) |
"Schizophrenia is characterized by severe abnormalities in cognition, including disordered attention." | 1.32 | Phencyclidine exacerbates attentional deficits in a neurodevelopmental rat model of schizophrenia. ( Grottick, AJ; Higgins, GA; Le Pen, G; Moreau, JL, 2003) |
Timeframe | Studies, this research(%) | All Research% |
---|---|---|
pre-1990 | 41 (17.08) | 18.7374 |
1990's | 8 (3.33) | 18.2507 |
2000's | 64 (26.67) | 29.6817 |
2010's | 94 (39.17) | 24.3611 |
2020's | 33 (13.75) | 2.80 |
Authors | Studies |
---|---|
Yechiam, E | 1 |
Zeif, D | 1 |
Ilic, K | 1 |
Kugler, AR | 1 |
Yan, B | 5 |
McNamara, N | 1 |
Larkin, HD | 1 |
Cutler, AJ | 3 |
Childress, AC | 6 |
Pardo, A | 4 |
Duhoux, S | 1 |
Gomeni, R | 1 |
Rafla, E | 2 |
King, TR | 4 |
Kando, JC | 4 |
Hervig, ME | 4 |
Toschi, C | 4 |
Petersen, A | 3 |
Vangkilde, S | 3 |
Gether, U | 4 |
Robbins, TW | 4 |
Konofal, E | 1 |
Lecendreux, M | 1 |
Bizot, JC | 1 |
Lormier, AT | 1 |
Figadère, B | 1 |
Surman, CBH | 2 |
Walsh, DM | 1 |
Gillies, D | 1 |
Leach, MJ | 1 |
Perez Algorta, G | 1 |
Lopera, SD | 1 |
O'Kane, VM | 1 |
Goldhirsh, JL | 2 |
Piper, BJ | 2 |
Perez-Vilar, S | 1 |
Kempner, ME | 1 |
Dutcher, SK | 1 |
Menzin, TJ | 1 |
Woods, C | 1 |
Leishear, K | 1 |
Osterhout, J | 1 |
Adimadhyam, S | 1 |
Adereti, M | 1 |
Carruth, A | 1 |
Hansbury, A | 1 |
Sandhu, SK | 1 |
Lyons, JG | 1 |
Tschudi, L | 1 |
Fischer, SKM | 1 |
Perlov, E | 1 |
Baumgartner, MR | 2 |
Soyka, M | 1 |
Müller, TJ | 1 |
Seifritz, E | 1 |
Mutschler, J | 1 |
Van Gerpen, S | 1 |
Soundy, T | 1 |
Vik, T | 2 |
Brodersen, B | 1 |
Alexander, GD | 1 |
Cavanah, LR | 1 |
Huey, LY | 1 |
Caballero-Puntiverio, M | 3 |
Lerdrup, LS | 2 |
Arvastson, L | 1 |
Aznar, S | 1 |
Andreasen, JT | 3 |
Rose, SJ | 1 |
Hathcock, MA | 1 |
White, WM | 1 |
Borowski, K | 1 |
Rivera-Chiauzzi, EY | 1 |
Kim, JD | 1 |
Diano, S | 1 |
Thurn, D | 1 |
Riedner, A | 1 |
Wolstein, J | 1 |
Board, AR | 1 |
Guy, G | 1 |
Jones, CM | 1 |
Hoots, B | 1 |
Elliott, J | 1 |
Johnston, A | 1 |
Husereau, D | 1 |
Kelly, SE | 1 |
Eagles, C | 1 |
Charach, A | 1 |
Hsieh, SC | 1 |
Bai, Z | 1 |
Hossain, A | 1 |
Skidmore, B | 1 |
Tsakonas, E | 1 |
Chojecki, D | 1 |
Mamdani, M | 1 |
Wells, GA | 1 |
Morello, F | 1 |
Voikar, V | 1 |
Parkkinen, P | 1 |
Panhelainen, A | 1 |
Rosenholm, M | 1 |
Makkonen, A | 1 |
Rantamäki, T | 1 |
Piepponen, P | 1 |
Aitta-Aho, T | 1 |
Partanen, J | 1 |
Helander, A | 1 |
Villen, T | 1 |
Widing, E | 1 |
Wohkittel, C | 1 |
Högger, P | 1 |
Fekete, S | 1 |
Romanos, M | 1 |
Gerlach, M | 2 |
Brown, TE | 1 |
Chen, J | 2 |
Robertson, B | 4 |
Al Awami, R | 1 |
Albanna, A | 1 |
Morelli, M | 1 |
Tognotti, E | 1 |
Norman, LJ | 1 |
Sudre, G | 1 |
Bouyssi-Kobar, M | 1 |
Sharp, W | 1 |
Shaw, P | 1 |
Moazen, P | 1 |
Parker, MG | 1 |
Dalley, JW | 1 |
Armstrong, C | 1 |
Kapolowicz, MR | 1 |
Chierrito de Oliveira, D | 1 |
Guerrero de Sousa, P | 1 |
Borges Dos Reis, C | 1 |
Tonin, FS | 1 |
Maria Steimbach, L | 1 |
Virtuoso, S | 1 |
Fernandez-Llimos, F | 1 |
Pontarolo, R | 1 |
Cristina Conegero Sanches, A | 1 |
Adler, LA | 5 |
Frick, G | 4 |
Dela Peña, IJI | 1 |
Dela Peña, I | 1 |
de la Peña, JB | 1 |
Kim, HJ | 1 |
Sohn, A | 1 |
Shin, CY | 1 |
Han, DH | 1 |
Kim, BN | 2 |
Ryu, JH | 1 |
Cheong, JH | 1 |
Binz, TM | 1 |
Williner, E | 1 |
Strajhar, P | 1 |
Dolder, PC | 1 |
Liechti, ME | 1 |
Kraemer, T | 1 |
Steuer, AE | 1 |
Stuckelman, ZD | 2 |
Mulqueen, JM | 2 |
Ferracioli-Oda, E | 2 |
Cohen, SC | 2 |
Coughlin, CG | 2 |
Leckman, JF | 2 |
Bloch, MH | 2 |
Cropsey, KL | 1 |
Schiavon, S | 1 |
Hendricks, PS | 1 |
Froelich, M | 1 |
Lentowicz, I | 1 |
Fargason, R | 1 |
Weisler, RH | 2 |
Greenbaum, M | 2 |
Arnold, V | 1 |
Yu, M | 1 |
Jaffee, M | 1 |
Newcorn, JH | 3 |
Stark, JG | 4 |
Adcock, S | 1 |
McMahen, R | 3 |
Sikes, C | 3 |
Hetherington, L | 1 |
Dommett, EJ | 3 |
Turner, AC | 2 |
Riley, TB | 1 |
Haensel, JX | 1 |
Overton, PG | 2 |
Cohen, JM | 1 |
Hernández-Díaz, S | 3 |
Bateman, BT | 2 |
Park, Y | 1 |
Desai, RJ | 1 |
Gray, KJ | 1 |
Patorno, E | 1 |
Mogun, H | 2 |
Huybrechts, KF | 3 |
Engelking, D | 2 |
Wigal, SB | 3 |
Brams, MN | 1 |
Turnbow, JM | 2 |
Pincus, Y | 1 |
Belden, HW | 1 |
Berry, SA | 1 |
Bröms, G | 1 |
Christensen, LB | 1 |
Einarsdóttir, K | 1 |
Engeland, A | 1 |
Furu, K | 3 |
Gissler, M | 1 |
Karlsson, P | 1 |
Karlstad, Ø | 2 |
Kieler, H | 2 |
Lahesmaa-Korpinen, AM | 1 |
Nørgaard, M | 1 |
Reutfors, J | 1 |
Sørensen, HT | 1 |
Zoega, H | 3 |
Faraone, SV | 8 |
Ruiz, P | 1 |
Calliari, A | 1 |
Genovese, P | 1 |
Scorza, C | 1 |
Pautassi, RM | 1 |
King, SA | 1 |
Casavant, MJ | 1 |
Spiller, HA | 1 |
Hodges, NL | 1 |
Chounthirath, T | 1 |
Smith, GA | 1 |
Kraev, I | 1 |
Stewart, MG | 1 |
Stramek, A | 1 |
Suhaiban, H | 1 |
Javanbakht, A | 1 |
Stuhec, M | 1 |
Lukić, P | 1 |
Locatelli, I | 1 |
Herman, BK | 2 |
Grupe, M | 1 |
Larsen, CW | 1 |
Dietz, AG | 1 |
Wigal, S | 1 |
Lopez, F | 1 |
Madhoo, M | 1 |
Moran, LV | 1 |
Ongur, D | 1 |
Hsu, J | 1 |
Castro, VM | 1 |
Perlis, RH | 1 |
Schneeweiss, S | 1 |
Cortese, S | 2 |
Bouhajib, M | 1 |
Steingard, R | 1 |
Taskiran, S | 1 |
Connor, DF | 1 |
Markowitz, JS | 2 |
Stein, MA | 3 |
Hess, J | 1 |
Wilens, T | 2 |
Castellani, G | 1 |
Contarini, G | 1 |
Mereu, M | 1 |
Albanesi, E | 1 |
Devroye, C | 1 |
D'Amore, C | 1 |
Ferretti, V | 1 |
De Martin, S | 1 |
Papaleo, F | 1 |
Regan, SL | 1 |
Hufgard, JR | 1 |
Pitzer, EM | 1 |
Sugimoto, C | 1 |
Hu, YC | 1 |
Williams, MT | 1 |
Vorhees, CV | 1 |
Sembower, MA | 1 |
Ertischek, MD | 1 |
Buchholtz, C | 1 |
Dasgupta, N | 1 |
Schnoll, SH | 1 |
Heal, DJ | 3 |
Smith, SL | 3 |
Gosden, J | 1 |
Nutt, DJ | 1 |
Grünblatt, E | 1 |
Lange, KW | 1 |
Wilson, TW | 2 |
Heinrichs-Graham, E | 2 |
White, ML | 2 |
Knott, NL | 2 |
Wetzel, MW | 2 |
Wilens, TE | 2 |
McBurnett, K | 1 |
Turnbow, J | 1 |
Rugino, T | 1 |
White, C | 1 |
Youcha, S | 1 |
Spencer, TJ | 6 |
Brown, A | 1 |
Seidman, LJ | 1 |
Valera, EM | 1 |
Makris, N | 1 |
Lomedico, A | 1 |
Biederman, J | 7 |
Mergy, MA | 2 |
Gowrishankar, R | 1 |
Davis, GL | 1 |
Jessen, TN | 1 |
Wright, J | 1 |
Stanwood, GD | 1 |
Hahn, MK | 1 |
Blakely, RD | 3 |
Beck, O | 1 |
Stephanson, N | 1 |
Sandqvist, S | 1 |
Franck, J | 1 |
Gonzalez-Heydrich, J | 1 |
Hsin, O | 1 |
Gumlak, S | 1 |
Kimball, K | 1 |
Rober, A | 1 |
Azeem, MW | 1 |
Hickory, M | 1 |
Mrakotsky, C | 1 |
Torres, A | 1 |
Mezzacappa, E | 1 |
Bourgeois, B | 1 |
Chen, Q | 1 |
Sjölander, A | 1 |
Runeson, B | 1 |
D'Onofrio, BM | 1 |
Lichtenstein, P | 1 |
Larsson, H | 1 |
Norum, J | 1 |
Olsen, AI | 1 |
Nohr, FI | 1 |
Heyd, A | 1 |
Totth, A | 1 |
Wagner, DJ | 1 |
Vallerand, IA | 1 |
McLennan, JD | 1 |
Fredriksen, M | 2 |
Dahl, AA | 1 |
Martinsen, EW | 1 |
Klungsøyr, O | 1 |
Haavik, J | 2 |
Peleikis, DE | 1 |
Gaiser, EC | 1 |
Matuskey, D | 1 |
Perkins, E | 1 |
D'Amico, C | 1 |
Abdelghany, O | 1 |
McKee, SA | 1 |
Cosgrove, KP | 1 |
Brams, M | 2 |
Kollins, SH | 4 |
Northcutt, J | 1 |
Padilla, A | 1 |
Kovtun, O | 1 |
Sakrikar, D | 2 |
Tomlinson, ID | 1 |
Chang, JC | 1 |
Arzeta-Ferrer, X | 1 |
Rosenthal, SJ | 1 |
Chinthapalli, K | 1 |
Jordan, CJ | 2 |
Taylor, DM | 1 |
Dwoskin, LP | 2 |
Kantak, KM | 2 |
Lachaine, J | 1 |
Sikirica, V | 1 |
Mathurin, K | 1 |
Merrill, RM | 1 |
Thygerson, SM | 1 |
Palmer, CA | 1 |
Pinnaka, S | 1 |
Gosai, K | 1 |
Czekierdowski, C | 1 |
Siller, PP | 1 |
Lapidus, KA | 1 |
Ermer, JC | 1 |
Pennick, M | 1 |
Punja, S | 2 |
Schmid, CH | 2 |
Hartling, L | 2 |
Urichuk, L | 2 |
Nikles, CJ | 2 |
Vohra, S | 2 |
Xu, D | 1 |
Jain, R | 2 |
Turner, KM | 1 |
Burne, TH | 1 |
Bahmanyar, S | 1 |
Martikainen, JE | 1 |
Pottegård, A | 1 |
Lemay, C | 1 |
Notzon, DP | 1 |
Mariani, JJ | 1 |
Pavlicova, M | 1 |
Glass, A | 1 |
Mahony, AL | 1 |
Brooks, DJ | 1 |
Grabowski, J | 1 |
Levin, FR | 1 |
Fitzpatrick, CM | 1 |
Woldbye, DP | 1 |
Cartabuke, RS | 1 |
Tobias, JD | 1 |
Rice, J | 1 |
Tumin, D | 1 |
Morley, CP | 1 |
Thorell, LB | 1 |
Dahlström, K | 2 |
Berman, SM | 1 |
Kuczenski, R | 1 |
McCracken, JT | 1 |
London, ED | 1 |
Kay, GG | 1 |
Michaels, MA | 2 |
Pakull, B | 1 |
Landgraf, JM | 1 |
Anderson, CS | 1 |
Youcha, SH | 1 |
Patrick, KS | 1 |
Straughn, AB | 1 |
Perkins, JS | 1 |
González, MA | 1 |
Thomson, A | 1 |
Maltezos, S | 1 |
Paliokosta, E | 1 |
Xenitidis, K | 1 |
Olfson, M | 1 |
Marcus, S | 1 |
Wan, G | 1 |
Dopheide, JA | 1 |
Pliszka, SR | 1 |
Winterstein, AG | 1 |
Gerhard, T | 1 |
Shuster, J | 1 |
Saidi, A | 1 |
Tang, A | 1 |
Wanchoo, SJ | 1 |
Swann, AC | 1 |
Dafny, N | 1 |
Cheetham, SC | 1 |
Merkel, RL | 3 |
Kuchibhatla, A | 1 |
Fan, X | 2 |
Xu, M | 1 |
Hess, EJ | 2 |
LoVecchio, F | 1 |
Ozimek, J | 1 |
Sawyers, B | 1 |
Thole, D | 1 |
Ginsberg, LD | 1 |
Murphy, WR | 1 |
Sitte, HH | 1 |
Freissmuth, M | 1 |
Janols, LO | 2 |
Liliemark, J | 1 |
Klintberg, K | 1 |
von Knorring, AL | 2 |
Froehlich, TE | 1 |
McGough, JJ | 1 |
Zhou, M | 1 |
Rebholz, H | 1 |
Brocia, C | 1 |
Warner-Schmidt, JL | 1 |
Fienberg, AA | 1 |
Nairn, AC | 1 |
Greengard, P | 1 |
Flajolet, M | 1 |
Christensen, L | 1 |
Sasané, R | 1 |
Hodgkins, P | 2 |
Harley, C | 1 |
Tetali, S | 1 |
Advokat, C | 3 |
Yu, ZJ | 1 |
Parker-Kotler, C | 1 |
Tran, K | 1 |
Weller, RA | 1 |
Weller, EB | 1 |
Reske, M | 1 |
Delis, DC | 1 |
Paulus, MP | 1 |
Swanson, J | 1 |
Baler, RD | 1 |
Volkow, ND | 1 |
Sagvolden, T | 1 |
Won, H | 1 |
Mah, W | 1 |
Kim, E | 2 |
Kim, JW | 1 |
Hahm, EK | 1 |
Kim, MH | 1 |
Cho, S | 1 |
Kim, J | 1 |
Jang, H | 1 |
Cho, SC | 1 |
Shin, MS | 1 |
Seo, J | 1 |
Jeong, J | 1 |
Choi, SY | 1 |
Kim, D | 1 |
Kang, C | 1 |
Marcus, SC | 1 |
Durkin, M | 1 |
Segal, S | 1 |
Findling, RL | 1 |
Khayrallah, M | 1 |
Wooters, TE | 1 |
Bardo, MT | 1 |
Bidwell, LC | 1 |
McClernon, FJ | 1 |
Gong, R | 1 |
Ding, C | 1 |
Hu, J | 1 |
Lu, Y | 1 |
Liu, F | 1 |
Mann, E | 1 |
Xu, F | 1 |
Cohen, MB | 1 |
Luo, M | 1 |
Lynch, LR | 1 |
Shaw, DM | 1 |
Wallace, SP | 1 |
Ciranni, MA | 1 |
Briggie, AM | 1 |
Kulaga, A | 1 |
O'Donnell, KE | 1 |
Barner, JC | 1 |
Khoza, S | 1 |
Oladapo, A | 1 |
Franzen, JD | 1 |
Mines, MA | 1 |
Jope, RS | 1 |
Sallee, FR | 1 |
Mazei-Robison, MS | 1 |
Richtand, NW | 1 |
Han, Q | 1 |
Hamilton, PJ | 1 |
Bowton, E | 1 |
Galli, A | 1 |
Veenstra-Vanderweele, J | 1 |
Gill, M | 1 |
Sandau, US | 1 |
Alderman, Z | 1 |
Corfas, G | 1 |
Ojeda, SR | 1 |
Raber, J | 1 |
Baumeister, AA | 1 |
Henderson, K | 1 |
Pow, JL | 1 |
Rothman, KJ | 1 |
Ólafsson, Ö | 1 |
Baldursson, G | 1 |
Almarsdóttir, AB | 1 |
Jónsdóttir, S | 1 |
Halldórsson, M | 1 |
Valdimarsdóttir, UA | 1 |
Shaw, M | 1 |
Coghill, D | 1 |
Hechtman, L | 3 |
Halmøy, A | 1 |
Pitman, JT | 1 |
Harris, NS | 1 |
O'Neill, B | 1 |
Gu, HH | 1 |
Perez, SM | 1 |
Shah, A | 1 |
Asher, A | 1 |
Lodge, DJ | 1 |
Turner, M | 1 |
Wilding, E | 1 |
Cassidy, E | 1 |
Adesman, AR | 1 |
Zetterström, R | 1 |
Le Pen, G | 1 |
Grottick, AJ | 1 |
Higgins, GA | 1 |
Moreau, JL | 1 |
ZRULL, JP | 1 |
WESTMAN, JC | 1 |
ARTHUR, B | 1 |
BELL, WA | 1 |
Diaz Heijtz, R | 1 |
Kolb, B | 1 |
Forssberg, H | 1 |
Avale, ME | 1 |
Falzone, TL | 1 |
Gelman, DM | 1 |
Low, MJ | 1 |
Grandy, DK | 1 |
Rubinstein, M | 1 |
Shintani, N | 1 |
Tanaka, K | 1 |
Hashimoto, H | 1 |
Baba, A | 1 |
Spencer, T | 2 |
Carboni, E | 1 |
Silvagni, A | 1 |
Wozniak, J | 1 |
Jou, R | 1 |
Handen, B | 1 |
Hardan, A | 1 |
Dodson, WW | 1 |
Quinn, PO | 1 |
Monuteaux, M | 1 |
Ricaurte, GA | 1 |
Mechan, AO | 1 |
Yuan, J | 1 |
Hatzidimitriou, G | 1 |
Xie, T | 1 |
Mayne, AH | 1 |
McCann, UD | 1 |
McDonnell, MA | 1 |
Dougherty, M | 1 |
Kitayama, S | 1 |
Sogawa, C | 1 |
Fletcher, PJ | 1 |
Tenn, CC | 1 |
Rizos, Z | 1 |
Lovic, V | 1 |
Kapur, S | 1 |
Samuels, JA | 1 |
Franco, K | 1 |
Wan, F | 1 |
Sorof, JM | 1 |
Kinkead, B | 1 |
Selz, KA | 1 |
Owens, MJ | 1 |
Mandell, AJ | 1 |
Grönlund, MA | 1 |
Aring, E | 1 |
Landgren, M | 1 |
Hellström, A | 1 |
Epstein, JN | 1 |
Conners, CK | 1 |
Hervey, AS | 1 |
Tonev, ST | 1 |
Arnold, LE | 5 |
Abikoff, HB | 1 |
Elliott, G | 1 |
Greenhill, LL | 1 |
Hoagwood, K | 1 |
Hinshaw, SP | 1 |
Hoza, B | 1 |
Jensen, PS | 1 |
March, JS | 1 |
Pelham, WE | 1 |
Severe, JB | 1 |
Swanson, JM | 2 |
Wells, K | 1 |
Vitiello, B | 1 |
Wigal, T | 1 |
Waldron, T | 1 |
Donner, R | 1 |
Ambrosini, PJ | 1 |
Langendijk, PN | 1 |
Wilde, AA | 1 |
Cox, DJ | 2 |
Moore, M | 2 |
Thorndike, F | 1 |
Muller, C | 1 |
Kovatchev, B | 2 |
Kalverdijk, LJ | 1 |
Buitelaar, JK | 1 |
van der Gaag, RJ | 1 |
Nowak, P | 1 |
Bortel, A | 1 |
Dabrowska, J | 1 |
Oswiecimska, J | 1 |
Drosik, M | 1 |
Kwiecinski, A | 1 |
Opara, J | 1 |
Kostrzewa, RM | 1 |
Brus, R | 1 |
Boellner, SW | 1 |
Childress, A | 1 |
Lopez, FA | 1 |
Krishnan, S | 1 |
Zhang, Y | 1 |
Quintana, H | 1 |
Cherlin, EA | 1 |
Duesenberg, DA | 1 |
Bangs, ME | 1 |
Ramsey, JL | 1 |
Feldman, PD | 1 |
Allen, AJ | 1 |
Kelsey, DK | 1 |
Goodman, DW | 1 |
Asheim, H | 1 |
Nilsen, KB | 1 |
Johansen, K | 1 |
Gualtieri, CT | 1 |
Johnson, LG | 1 |
Zhu, HJ | 1 |
Wang, JS | 1 |
Donovan, JL | 1 |
Jiang, Y | 1 |
Gibson, BB | 1 |
DeVane, CL | 1 |
Gustafsson, P | 2 |
Hansson, K | 1 |
Eidevall, L | 1 |
Thernlund, G | 2 |
Svedin, CG | 1 |
Dupont, RL | 1 |
Bucher, RH | 1 |
Wilford, BB | 1 |
Coleman, JJ | 1 |
Burket, R | 1 |
Mikami, AY | 1 |
Williams, DW | 1 |
Moore, RJ | 1 |
Michelson, D | 1 |
Kulkarni, RS | 1 |
Rowley, HL | 1 |
Wray, SR | 1 |
Melville, GN | 1 |
Grell, GA | 1 |
Edge, PC | 1 |
Hartley, LR | 1 |
Mailman, RB | 1 |
Lewis, MH | 1 |
Kilts, CD | 1 |
McIntyre, HB | 1 |
Firemark, HM | 1 |
Cho, AK | 1 |
Bodner, L | 1 |
Gomez, M | 1 |
Scholander, T | 1 |
Gross, MD | 2 |
Stovner, AM | 1 |
Wyller, TB | 1 |
Skulberg, A | 1 |
Os, L | 1 |
Korsmo, G | 1 |
Schaller, JL | 1 |
Behar, D | 1 |
Gillberg, C | 1 |
Melander, H | 1 |
Hägglöf, B | 1 |
Eidevall-Wallin, L | 1 |
Kopp, S | 1 |
Seeman, P | 1 |
Madras, BK | 1 |
Greenhill, L | 1 |
Waslick, B | 1 |
Cantwell, D | 1 |
Clevenger, W | 1 |
Davies, M | 1 |
Lerner, M | 1 |
Regino, R | 1 |
Fineberg, E | 1 |
Baren, M | 1 |
Browne, R | 1 |
Martinez, D | 1 |
Gelernter, J | 1 |
Abi-Dargham, A | 1 |
van Dyck, CH | 1 |
Kegeles, L | 1 |
Innis, RB | 1 |
Laruelle, M | 1 |
Fernell, E | 1 |
Grov, B | 1 |
Garåsen, H | 1 |
Sund, AM | 1 |
Zeiner, P | 1 |
Brase, DA | 1 |
Loh, HH | 1 |
Huestis, RD | 3 |
Wemmer, D | 2 |
Smeltzer, DJ | 3 |
Scheib, J | 1 |
Colner, G | 1 |
Shaywitz, BA | 1 |
Yager, RD | 1 |
Klopper, JH | 1 |
Mangold, B | 1 |
Schulz, E | 1 |
Remschmidt, H | 1 |
Gadow, KD | 1 |
Donnelly, M | 1 |
Rapoport, JL | 1 |
Ismond, DR | 1 |
Eichlseder, W | 1 |
Denhoff, E | 1 |
Millichap, JG | 1 |
Sroufe, LA | 1 |
Stewart, MA | 1 |
Wender, PH | 4 |
Sobotka, TJ | 1 |
Cook, MP | 1 |
DiPalma, JR | 1 |
Meyerhoff, JL | 2 |
Snyder, SH | 2 |
Erenberg, G | 1 |
Kirilcuk, V | 1 |
Corson, SA | 1 |
Corson, EO | 1 |
Omenn, GS | 1 |
Lightfoot, OB | 1 |
Reece, RM | 1 |
Chapel, JL | 1 |
Verret, S | 1 |
Glós, J | 1 |
Buchsbaum, M | 1 |
Wender, P | 1 |
Peters, JE | 1 |
Howell, MC | 1 |
Rever, GW | 1 |
Scholl, ML | 1 |
Trowbridge, F | 1 |
Rutledge, A | 1 |
Trial | Phase | Enrollment | Study Type | Start Date | Status | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A Phase 1 Open-label Study of the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of d- and l-Amphetamine After Multiple Daily Doses of SHP465 6.25 mg Administered in Children Aged 4 to 5 Years With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder[NCT03327402] | Phase 1 | 24 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2018-03-13 | Completed | ||
Amphetamine Extended-Release Tablets in the Treatment of Adults With ADHD[NCT03834766] | Phase 3 | 130 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2019-02-06 | Completed | ||
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Multicenter, Placebo-controlled, Forced-dose Titration, Safety and Efficacy Study of SHP465 in Adults Aged 18-55 Years With Attention-deficit/ Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)[NCT02604407] | Phase 3 | 275 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2015-11-19 | Completed | ||
Adjuvant Effects of Vitamin A and Vitamin D Supplementation on Treatment of Children With ADHD:A Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo-controlled, Multicentric Trial.[NCT04284059] | Phase 4 | 504 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2021-02-25 | Recruiting | ||
Dyanavel® XR Extended-Release Oral Suspension in the Treatment of Children Wit[NCT03088267] | Phase 3 | 18 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2017-02-11 | Completed | ||
A Multicenter, Dose-Optimized, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Crossover Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of AR11 (Amphetamine Sulfate) in Pediatric Patients (Ages 6-12) With ADHD in a Laboratory Classroom[NCT01986062] | Phase 4 | 97 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2013-12-31 | Completed | ||
A Phase III, Randomized, Double-blind, Multi-center, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Safety and Efficacy Study of SPD465 in Adults With Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD).[NCT00150579] | Phase 3 | 240 participants | Interventional | 2005-01-27 | Completed | ||
A Multi-Center, Open Label, Evaluation of the Effect and Safety of Lisdexamfetamine in Children Aged 6-12 With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and Autism Spectrum Disorder[NCT03337646] | Phase 4 | 48 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2018-09-26 | Active, not recruiting | ||
A Phase IIIb Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Time Course of Treatment With ADDERALL XR and STRATTERA Compared to Placebo on Simulated Driving Safety and Performance and Cognitive Functioning in Adults With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD[NCT00557960] | Phase 3 | 36 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2004-02-25 | Completed | ||
A Phase II, Open-Label Co-Administration Study of SPD503 and Psychostimulants in Children and Adolescents Aged 6-17 With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)[NCT00151996] | Phase 2 | 75 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2004-08-16 | Completed | ||
Candidate Gene Screening for 6-14 Year Old Patients With ADHD (Attention Deficit/ Hyperactivity Disorder)[NCT03018574] | 100 participants (Actual) | Observational | 2016-05-31 | Completed | |||
A Within-Subject Cross-Over Comparison Between Immediate Release and Extended Release Adderall[NCT00468143] | Phase 4 | 62 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2007-08-31 | Completed | ||
The Assessment of Efficacy and Tolerability of Methylphenidate vs. Risperidone in the Treatment of Children and Adolescents With ADHD and Disruptive Disorders[NCT02063945] | Phase 4 | 5 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2017-02-01 | Terminated (stopped due to Major difficulties recruiting participants) | ||
Neurorehabilitation Through Hippotherapy on Neurofunctional Sequels of Brain Stroke: (i) Effect on Patient's Functional Independence, Sensorimotor and Cognitive Capacities and Quality of Life (ii) Effect on Caregivers' Quality of Life[NCT04759326] | 52 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2022-04-27 | Recruiting | |||
Methylphenidate Effect on Performing Humphrey Visual Fields[NCT02162381] | 32 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2014-06-30 | Completed | |||
Multimodal Treatment Study of Children With ADHD[NCT00000388] | Phase 4 | 0 participants | Interventional | 1998-09-30 | Completed | ||
The Effects of Methylphenidate (MPH) and Non-invasive Brain Stimulation (tDCS) on Inhibitory Control Children With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)[NCT04964427] | 26 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2021-02-08 | Completed | |||
A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo- and Active-Controlled, 3-Treatment, 3-Period, Crossover Study With One Week Per Treatment and Once-a-Day Dosing of Either NRP104, Adderall XR, or Placebo in Children Aged 6 to 12 Years With Attention-Deficit H[NCT00557011] | Phase 2 | 52 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2004-09-30 | Completed | ||
Effects of the Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Prevention of Cognitive Dysfunction in Elderly Patients Submitted to Cardiac Surgeries: Prospective, Randomized and Double-blind Study[NCT02549560] | 138 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2021-07-08 | Recruiting | |||
Pharmacological Treatment of Rett Syndrome by Stimulation of Synaptic Maturation With Recombinant Human IGF-1(Mecasermin [rDNA] Injection)[NCT01777542] | Phase 2 | 30 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2013-01-31 | Completed | ||
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024] |
Height (in centimeters) was measured using a stadiometer with the participant standing on a flat surface without shoes and with the chin parallel to the floor. Final on-treatment assessment (FoTA) was defined as the last valid assessment obtained after baseline and while on IP (on or before 2 days after the last dose date). (NCT03327402)
Timeframe: FoTA (up to Day 30)
Intervention | centimeter (cm) (Mean) |
---|---|
SHP465 | 1.601 |
Weight (in kilograms) was measured using a calibrated scale. Participant should be in light clothes and without shoes. FoTA was defined as the last valid assessment obtained after baseline and while on IP (on or before 2 days after the last dose date). (NCT03327402)
Timeframe: FoTA (up to Day 30)
Intervention | kilogram (kg) (Mean) |
---|---|
SHP465 | -0.305 |
The PSQ was a 7-item questionnaire typically used to assess sleep quality with pharmacologic treatment. The questionnaire collected data on average time to sleep, sleep latency, frequency of interrupted sleep, duration of interrupted sleep, total sleep time and sleep quality over the last week. FoTA was defined as the last valid assessment obtained after baseline and while on IP (on or before 2 days after the last dose date). (NCT03327402)
Timeframe: FoTA (up to Day 30)
Intervention | minutes (Mean) |
---|---|
SHP465 | 10.1 |
The PSQ was a 7-item questionnaire typically used to assess sleep quality with pharmacologic treatment. The questionnaire collected data on average time to sleep, sleep latency, frequency of interrupted sleep, duration of interrupted sleep, total sleep time and sleep quality over the last week. FoTA was defined as the last valid assessment obtained after baseline and while on IP (on or before 2 days after the last dose date). (NCT03327402)
Timeframe: FoTA (up to Day 30)
Intervention | hours (Mean) |
---|---|
SHP465 | 9.1 |
The PSQ was a 7-item questionnaire typically used to assess sleep quality with pharmacologic treatment. The questionnaire collected data on average time to sleep, sleep latency, frequency of interrupted sleep, duration of interrupted sleep, total sleep time and sleep quality over the last week. FoTA was defined as the last valid assessment obtained after baseline and while on IP (on or before 2 days after the last dose date). (NCT03327402)
Timeframe: FoTA (up to Day 30)
Intervention | minutes (Mean) |
---|---|
SHP465 | 19.8 |
Clinical laboratory tests included biochemistry, endocrinology, hematology and urinalysis. Any change in clinical laboratory results which are deemed clinically significant by the investigator were reported as TEAE. (NCT03327402)
Timeframe: From start of study drug administration up to follow-up (up to 5 weeks)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
SHP465 | 0 |
12-lead ECG were evaluated. Any change in ECG assessments which are deemed clinically significant by the investigator were reported as TEAE. (NCT03327402)
Timeframe: From start of study drug administration up to follow-up (up to 5 weeks)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
SHP465 | 0 |
Vital sign assessments included blood pressure, pulse, respiratory rate and body temperature. Any change in vital signs which were deemed clinically significant by the investigator were recorded as TEAE. (NCT03327402)
Timeframe: From start of study drug administration up to follow-up (up to 5 weeks)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
SHP465 | 1 |
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily had a causal relationship with this treatment. TEAEs was defined as AEs that start or deteriorate on or after the date of the first dose of investigational product (IP) and no later than 3 days following the last dose of IP. (NCT03327402)
Timeframe: From start of study drug administration up to follow-up (up to 5 weeks)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
SHP465 | 11 |
Apparent volume of distribution at steady state of plasma d-amphetamine and plasma l-amphetamine after oral dose administration were evaluated using rich sampling collection method.Values displayed do not necessarily reflect the actual precision obtained. (NCT03327402)
Timeframe: Week 4: Predose, 2, 5, 8, 12, 16, 24 hours (Day 8), 48 hours (Day 9) Postdose on Day 7
Intervention | liter (Geometric Mean) | |
---|---|---|
d-Amphetamine | l-Amphetamine | |
SHP465 | 90.09 | 109.4 |
Area under the concentration time curve from time five hours to the time of last quantifiable concentration of plasma d-amphetamine and plasma l-amphetamine were evaluated using rich sampling collection method.Values displayed do not necessarily reflect the actual precision obtained. (NCT03327402)
Timeframe: Week 4: 5, 8, 12, 16, 24 hours (Day 8), 48 hours (Day 9) Postdose on Day 7
Intervention | hr*ng/mL (Geometric Mean) | |
---|---|---|
d-Amphetamine | l-Amphetamine | |
SHP465 | 549.9 | 194.1 |
Area under the concentration-time curve from time five hours to twelve hours postdose (AUC5-12) in plasma d-amphetamine and plasma l-amphetamine were evaluated using rich sampling collection method.Values displayed do not necessarily reflect the actual precision obtained. (NCT03327402)
Timeframe: Week 4: 5, 8, 12 hours Postdose on Day 7
Intervention | hr*ng/mL (Geometric Mean) | |
---|---|---|
d-Amphetamine | l-Amphetamine | |
SHP465 | 195.2 | 61.88 |
Area under the concentration-time curve from time of dosing to the last measurable concentration of plasma d-amphetamine and plasma l-amphetamine were evaluated using rich sampling collection method. Values displayed do not necessarily reflect the actual precision obtained. (NCT03327402)
Timeframe: Week 4: Predose, 2, 5, 8, 12, 16, 24 hours (Day 8), 48 hours (Day 9) Postdose on Day 7
Intervention | hr*ng/mL (Geometric Mean) | |
---|---|---|
d-Amphetamine | l-Amphetamine | |
SHP465 | 646.3 | 222.1 |
Area under the concentration-time curve from time sixteen hours to twenty-four hours postdose (AUC16-24) in plasma d-amphetamine and plasma l-amphetamine were evaluated using rich sampling collection method. Values displayed do not necessarily reflect the actual precision obtained. (NCT03327402)
Timeframe: Week 4: 16, 24 hours (Day 8) Postdose on Day 7
Intervention | hr*ng/mL (Geometric Mean) | |
---|---|---|
d-Amphetamine | l-Amphetamine | |
SHP465 | 122.1 | 43.44 |
Area under the concentration-time curve from time twelve hours to sixteen hours postdose (AUC12-16) in plasma d-amphetamine and plasma l-amphetamine were evaluated using rich sampling collection method. Values displayed do not necessarily reflect the actual precision obtained. (NCT03327402)
Timeframe: Week 4: 12, 16 hours Postdose on Day 7
Intervention | hr*ng/mL (Geometric Mean) | |
---|---|---|
d-Amphetamine | l-Amphetamine | |
SHP465 | 89.68 | 29.92 |
Area under the concentration time curve from time zero predose to five hours postdose of plasma d-amphetamine and plasma d-amphetamine were evaluated using rich sampling collection method. Values displayed do not necessarily reflect the actual precision obtained. (NCT03327402)
Timeframe: Week 4: Predose, 2, 5 hours Postdose on Day 7
Intervention | hr*ng/mL (Geometric Mean) | |
---|---|---|
d-Amphetamine | l-Amphetamine | |
SHP465 | 109.7 | 34.53 |
Area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration of plasma d-amphetamine and plasma l-amphetamine were evaluated using rich sampling collection method. Values displayed do not necessarily reflect the actual precision obtained. (NCT03327402)
Timeframe: Week 4: Predose, 2, 5, 8, 12, 16, 24 hours (Day 8), 48 hours (Day 9) Postdose on Day 7
Intervention | hour*nanogram per milliliter (hr*ng/mL) (Geometric Mean) | |
---|---|---|
d-Amphetamine | l-Amphetamine | |
SHP465 | 646.3 | 222.1 |
Area under the concentration-time curve over the dosing interval (24 hours) at steady state of plasma d-amphetamine and plasma l-amphetamine were evaluated using rich sampling collection method. Values displayed do not necessarily reflect the actual precision obtained. (NCT03327402)
Timeframe: Week 4: Predose, 2, 5, 8, 12, 16, 24 hours (Day 8), 48 hours (Day 9) Postdose on Day 7
Intervention | hr*ng/mL (Geometric Mean) | |
---|---|---|
d-Amphetamine | l-Amphetamine | |
SHP465 | 520.6 | 171.0 |
Maximum plasma drug concentration occurred at time of maximum observed concentration of plasma d-amphetamine and plasma l-amphetamine during a dosing interval were evaluated using rich sampling collection method. Values displayed do not necessarily reflect the actual precision obtained. (NCT03327402)
Timeframe: Week 4: Predose, 2, 5, 8, 12, 16, 24 hours (Day 8), 48 hours (Day 9) Postdose on Day 7
Intervention | nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) (Geometric Mean) | |
---|---|---|
d-Amphetamine | l-Amphetamine | |
SHP465 | 31.37 | 9.895 |
C-SSRS was a semi-structured interview that captures the occurrence, severity, and frequency of suicide-related thoughts (suicidal ideation) and suicidal behaviors during the assessment period needed to be determine if a suicide-related thought or behavior were occurred. The assessment was done by the nature of the responses, not by a numbered scale. FoTA was defined as the last valid assessment obtained after baseline and while on IP (on or before 2 days after the last dose date). (NCT03327402)
Timeframe: FoTA (up to Day 30)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |
---|---|---|
Suicidal Ideation | Suicidal Behavior | |
SHP465 | 0 | 0 |
The PSQ was a 7-item questionnaire typically used to assess sleep quality with pharmacologic treatment. The questionnaire collected data on average time to sleep, sleep latency, frequency of interrupted sleep, duration of interrupted sleep, total sleep time and sleep quality over the last week. The assessment was done by the nature of the responses, not by a numbered scale. FoTA was defined as the last valid assessment obtained after baseline and while on IP (on or before 2 days after the last dose date). (NCT03327402)
Timeframe: FoTA (up to Day 30)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
FoTA: Overall quality of sleep - Very poor | FoTA: Overall quality of sleep - Poor | FoTA: Overall quality of sleep - Average | FoTA: Overall quality of sleep - Good | FoTA: Overall quality of sleep - Very Good | |
SHP465 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 11 | 3 |
Observed analyte concentration of plasma d-amphetamine and plasma l-amphetamine at 12 hours after dose administration were evaluated using rich sampling collection method. Values displayed do not necessarily reflect the actual precision obtained. (NCT03327402)
Timeframe: Week 4: 12 hours (Day 8) Postdose on Day 7
Intervention | ng/mL (Geometric Mean) | |
---|---|---|
d-Amphetamine | l-Amphetamine | |
SHP465 | 24.59 | 8.059 |
Observed analyte concentration of plasma d-amphetamine and plasma l-amphetamine at 16 hours after dose administration were evaluated using rich sampling collection method.Values displayed do not necessarily reflect the actual precision obtained. (NCT03327402)
Timeframe: Week 4: 16 hours (Day 8) Postdose on Day 7
Intervention | ng/mL (Geometric Mean) | |
---|---|---|
d-Amphetamine | l-Amphetamine | |
SHP465 | 20.53 | 6.957 |
Observed analyte concentration of plasma d-amphetamine and plasma l-amphetamine at 24 hours after dose administration were evaluated using rich sampling collection method.Values displayed do not necessarily reflect the actual precision obtained. (NCT03327402)
Timeframe: Week 4: 24 hours (Day 8) Postdose on Day 7
Intervention | ng/mL (Geometric Mean) | |
---|---|---|
d-Amphetamine | l-Amphetamine | |
SHP465 | 11.16 | 4.186 |
Time required for the plasma drug concentration to reach half of its original value of plasma d-amphetamine and plasma l-amphetamine were evaluated using rich sampling collection method.Values displayed do not necessarily reflect the actual precision obtained. (NCT03327402)
Timeframe: Week 4: Predose, 2, 5, 8, 12, 16, 24 hours (Day 8), 48 hours (Day 9) Postdose on Day 7
Intervention | hour (Median) | |
---|---|---|
d-Amphetamine | l-Amphetamine | |
SHP465 | 9.911 | 12.16 |
Terminal Rate Constant of plasma d-amphetamine and plasma l-amphetamine were evaluated using rich sampling collection method.Values displayed do not necessarily reflect the actual precision obtained. (NCT03327402)
Timeframe: Week 4: Predose, 2, 5, 8, 12, 16, 24 hours (Day 8), 48 hours (Day 9) Postdose on Day 7
Intervention | per hour (Geometric Mean) | |
---|---|---|
d-Amphetamine | l-Amphetamine | |
SHP465 | 0.06639 | 0.05632 |
Time to reach maximum observed plasma drug concentration of plasma d-amphetamine and plasma l-amphetamine during a dosing interval were evaluated using rich sampling collection method. Values displayed do not necessarily reflect the actual precision obtained. (NCT03327402)
Timeframe: Week 4: Predose, 2, 5, 8, 12, 16, 24 hours (Day 8), 48 hours (Day 9) Postdose on Day 7
Intervention | hour (Median) | |
---|---|---|
d-Amphetamine | l-Amphetamine | |
SHP465 | 7.917 | 7.917 |
Apparent total clearance of the plasma drug concentration of plasma d- amphetamine and plasma l-amphetamine after oral dose administration were evaluated using rich sampling collection method.Values displayed do not necessarily reflect the actual precision obtained. (NCT03327402)
Timeframe: Week 4: Predose, 2, 5, 8, 12, 16, 24 hours (Day 8), 48 hours (Day 9) Postdose on Day 7
Intervention | Liter per hour (L/hr) (Geometric Mean) | |
---|---|---|
d-Amphetamine | l-Amphetamine | |
SHP465 | 5.618 | 5.703 |
The CSHQ was a validated, retrospective, parent-reported sleep screening tool. The questionnaire consisted of 35 items that yield a TSD score, as well as 8 subscale scores, including bedtime resistance, sleep duration, parasomnias, sleep disordered breathing, night wakings, daytime sleepiness, sleep anxiety, and sleep onset delay. Each item receives a score from 1 (meaning the problem occurs rarely) to 3 (meaning the problem usually occurs); therefore, a higher score is the worse outcome. Scale ranges are as follows: Bedtime Resistance: 6 to 18, Sleep Onset Delay: 1 to 3, Sleep Duration: 3 to 9, Sleep Anxiety: 4 to 12, Night Wakings: 3 to 9, Parasomnias: 7 to 21, Disordered Breathing: 3 to 9, Daytime Sleepiness: 8 to 24, and Total Disturbance (items from all scales): 33 to 99. A negative value indicated less sleep disturbance. (NCT03327402)
Timeframe: FoTA (up to Day 30)
Intervention | Units on scale (Mean) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FoTA: Total Sleep Disturbance Score | FoTA: Bedtime Resistance | FoTA: Sleep Onset Delay | FoTA: Sleep Duration | FoTA: Sleep Anxiety | FoTA: Night Wakings | FoTA: Parasomnias | FoTA: Sleep Disordered Breathing | FoTA: Daytime Sleepiness | |
SHP465 | 45.4 | 10.1 | 1.4 | 4.3 | 6.2 | 4.1 | 8.9 | 3.2 | 10.6 |
Trough plasma drug concentration (predose concentrations collected at steady state) of plasma d-amphetamine and plasma l-amphetamine were evaluated using rich sampling collection method. Values displayed do not necessarily reflect the actual precision obtained. (NCT03327402)
Timeframe: Predose on Day 1 and Day 28 and at 24 hours (Day 29) postdose on Day 28
Intervention | ng/mL (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
d-Amphetamine | l-Amphetamine | |
SHP465 | 7.934 | 3.092 |
The Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) is a paper-and-pencil cognitive test presented on a single sheet of paper that requires a subject to match symbols to numbers according to a key located on the top of the page. The DSST is sensitive to the presence of cognitive dysfunction as well as to change in cognitive function. The DSST is a 90 second test requiring participants to match symbols with numbers according to a code. Potential scores range from 0 to 100, and lower scores indicate worse performance. (NCT03834766)
Timeframe: From baseline to week 5
Intervention | Score on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
AMPH ER Tab | 4.8 |
Matching Placebo | 6.5 |
The Total Math Score is the sum of the number of math problems attempted plus the number of math problems answered correctly and it provides an objective measure of performance that is time-sensitive, ADHD medication-sensitive, and well documented as a measure to evaluate ADHD medication effectiveness throughout the day. The Total Math Score ranges from 0-800 with higher scores indicating better performance. (NCT03834766)
Timeframe: Pre-dose to 14 hour post-dose
Intervention | Score on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
AMPH ER Tab | 259.5 |
Matching Placebo | 260.6 |
AISRS scale was developed to better capture symptoms of ADHD in adult patients. The scale has 18 items scored as follows: 0 (none), 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), 3 (severe). The maximum total score for the scale is 54 points. (NCT03834766)
Timeframe: Baseline, Visit 1 (week 1), Visit 2 (week 2), Visit 3 (week 3), Visit 4 (week 4), Visit 5 (week 5)
Intervention | Score on a scale (Mean) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Visit 1 | Visit 2 | Visit 3 | Visit 4 | Visit 5 | |
AMPH ER Tab | -7.2 | -11.2 | -15 | -15.4 | -15.9 |
Matching Placebo | -5.3 | -8.1 | -8.8 | -9.3 | -9.5 |
The Clinical Global Impression - Severity scale (CGI-S) is a 7-point scale that requires the clinician to rate the severity of the patient's illness at the time of assessment, relative to the clinician's past experience with patients who have the same diagnosis. Possible ratings are: 1=normal, not at all ill; 2=borderline mentally ill; 3=mildly ill; 4=moderately ill; 5=markedly ill; 6=severely ill; 7=among the most extremely ill patients. (NCT03834766)
Timeframe: Baseline, Visit 1 (week 1), Visit 2 (week 2), Visit 3 (week 3), Visit 4 (week 4), Visit 5 (week 5)
Intervention | Score on a scale (Mean) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Visit 1 | Visit 2 | Visit 3 | Visit 4 | Visit 5 | |
AMPH ER Tab | -0.6 | -1.0 | -1.3 | -1.4 | -1.3 |
Matching Placebo | -0.3 | -0.6 | -0.6 | -0.8 | -0.7 |
The Total Math Score is the sum of the number of math problems attempted plus the number of math problems answered correctly and it provides an objective measure of performance that is time-sensitive, ADHD medication-sensitive, and well documented as a measure to evaluate ADHD medication effectiveness throughout the day. The Total Math Score ranges from 0-800 with higher scores indicating better performance. (NCT03834766)
Timeframe: Visit 5 (week 5)
Intervention | Score on a scale (Mean) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.5 hours | 1 hours | 2 hours | 4 hours | 8 hours | 10 hours | 12 hours | 13 hours | 14 hours | |
AMPH ER Tab | 64.5 | 67.9 | 84.4 | 81.7 | 78.8 | 81.2 | 85.2 | 88.8 | 89 |
Matching Placebo | 39.7 | 27.8 | 47.0 | 53.0 | 48.2 | 53.8 | 58.3 | 47.7 | 62.9 |
CGI scales permit a global evaluation of the participant's severity and improvement over time. CGI-I was performed to rate the severity of a participant's condition on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill participants). (NCT02604407)
Timeframe: Visit 6 (Week 4)
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 3.1 |
SHP465 12.5 mg | 2.4 |
SHP465 37.5 mg | 1.9 |
The ADHD-RS was developed to measure the behaviors of children with Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The adult ADHD-RS with prompts consists of 18 items designated to reflect current symptomatology of ADHD based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) criteria. Each item is scored on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 3 (severe symptoms), with the total score for the rating scale ranging from 0 to 54. Higher score = more severe symptoms.The scale is subdivided into 2 subscales of 9 symptoms each: hyperactivity/impulsivity and inattentiveness. Adult prompts are included with the ADHD-RS to create a semistructured measurement that allows the clinician to probe the extent, frequency, breadth, severity, and consequences of these symptoms to ascertain impairment in an adult population. (NCT02604407)
Timeframe: Baseline, Visit 6 (Week 4)
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Baseline | Change at Visit 6 | |
Placebo | 40.5 | -11.0 |
SHP465 12.5 mg | 39.8 | -18.1 |
SHP465 37.5 mg | 39.9 | -23.8 |
Change in SKAMP-C (Swanson, Kotkin, Agler, M-Flynn, and Pelham combined) score from pre-dose, by treatment. The SKAMP-C is a rating scale that assesses functional impairment related to ADHD in the classroom, including the performance of academic tasks, following class rules, and interacting with peers and adults in the classroom. The SKAMP-C is a 13-item, 7-score rating system (0=normal to 7=maximal impairment). The higher the score, the worse the impairment. A decrease from baseline in the combined (all 13 items) score indicates improvement. The SKAMP-C is used to assess the time course of treatment effects in laboratory classroom studies. (NCT03088267)
Timeframe: Change in SKAMP-C score from baseline to 30 minutes postdose.
Intervention | number of questions answered correctly (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Active Treatment | -6.1 |
Placebo Treatment | 2.5 |
Change from pre-dose in PERMP-C scores (Permanent Product Measure of Performance; defined as the number of problems attempted and number of problems solved correctly) at 30 minutes post-dose and at 3 hours post-dose. The PERMP-C is designed to assess compliance and academic productivity in school children. It is a 10-minute timed test in which the number of problems attempted and correct are assessed prior to and after an intervention. Scoring is based on problems attempted and correct. An increase in numerical score is indicative of improvement. (NCT03088267)
Timeframe: 30 minutes postdose and 3 hours postdose
Intervention | Change from baseline in PERMP score (Least Squares Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Change from predose in PERMP-C at 30 minutes | Change from predose in PERMP-C at 3 hours | |
Active Treatment | 14.4 | 52.4 |
Placebo Treatment | -4.7 | -7.9 |
Swanson, Kotkin, Agler, M-Flynn, and Pelham Scale [SKAMP]-combined scores measured during Laboratory Classroom Days. The SKAMP scale is a validated subjective measure of ADHD symptoms in a laboratory classroom, comprised of 13 items on which subjects are rated according to a 7 point scale (0=normal to 6=maximal impairment); maximum score 78. The SKAMP-combined score is obtained by summing the rating values for each of the 13 items, whereby the higher the SKAMP score, the greater the impairment. (NCT01986062)
Timeframe: 2 hours post-dose
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
AR11 (Amphetamine Sulfate) | 10.0 |
Placebo | 17.8 |
Permanent Product Measure of Performance (PERMP) assessments measured during Laboratory Classroom Days. The PERMP is an individualized, five-page math exam consisting of 400 problems. Subjects are instructed to complete as many math problems as possible in 10 minutes. Performance is evaluated using the number of problems attempted (maximum score = 400) and the number of problems correct (maximum score = 400). (NCT01986062)
Timeframe: 0.75, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 hours post-dose
Intervention | number of problems attempted (Mean) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.75 hours post-dose | 2.0 hours post-dose | 4.0 hours post-dose | 6.0 hours post-dose | 8.0 hours post-dose | 10.0 hours post-dose | |
AR11 (Amphetamine Sulfate) | 111.6 | 113.4 | 113.2 | 101.3 | 98.2 | 95.2 |
Placebo | 91.2 | 85.7 | 85.1 | 74.9 | 76.4 | 76.3 |
Permanent Product Measure of Performance (PERMP) assessments measured during Laboratory Classroom Days. The PERMP is an individualized, five-page math exam consisting of 400 problems. Subjects are instructed to complete as many math problems as possible in 10 minutes. Performance is evaluated using the number of problems attempted (maximum score = 400) and the number of problems correct (maximum score = 400). (NCT01986062)
Timeframe: 0.75, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 hours post-dose
Intervention | number of problems correct (Mean) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.75 hours post-dose | 2.0 hours post-dose | 4.0 hours post-dose | 6.0 hours post-dose | 8.0 hours post-dose | 10.0 hours post-dose | |
AR11 (Amphetamine Sulfate) | 104.5 | 107.1 | 107.0 | 95.6 | 92.7 | 89.9 |
Placebo | 83.9 | 78.9 | 79.9 | 70.5 | 71.5 | 72.3 |
The SKAMP scale is a validated subjective measure of ADHD symptoms. It is comprised of 13 items (grouped under the subcategories of attention, deportment, quality of work, and compliance) on which subjects are rated according to a 7-point scale (0 = normal to 6 = maximal impairment). The SKAMP-Attention subscale score is comprised of four of the 13 items with a maximum score of 24. (NCT01986062)
Timeframe: 0.75, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 hours post-dose
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.75 hours post-dose | 2.0 hours post-dose | 4.0 hours post-dose | 6.0 hours post-dose | 8.0 hours post-dose | 10.0 hours post-dose | |
AR11 (Amphetamine Sulfate) | 2.2 | 1.9 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 2.8 | 3.2 |
Placebo | 3.4 | 3.4 | 4.0 | 3.6 | 4.1 | 4.0 |
The SKAMP scale is a validated subjective measure of ADHD symptoms. It is comprised of 13 items (grouped under the subcategories of attention, deportment, quality of work, and compliance) on which subjects are rated according to a 7-point scale (0 = normal to 6 = maximal impairment). The SKAMP-Deportment subscale score is comprised of four of the 13 items with a maximum score of 24. (NCT01986062)
Timeframe: 0.75, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 hours post-dose
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.75 hours post-dose | 2.0 hours post-dose | 4.0 hours post-dose | 6.0 hours post-dose | 8.0 hours post-dose | 10.0 hours post-dose | |
AR11 (Amphetamine Sulfate) | 2.1 | 1.6 | 2.1 | 3.1 | 3.5 | 3.1 |
Placebo | 3.9 | 4.0 | 4.7 | 4.3 | 4.9 | 4.9 |
Swanson, Kotkin, Agler, M-Flynn, and Pelham Scale [SKAMP]-combined scores measured during Laboratory Classroom Days. The SKAMP scale is a validated subjective measure of ADHD symptoms in a laboratory classroom, comprised of 13 items on which subjects are rated according to a 7 point scale (0=normal to 6=maximal impairment); maximum score 78. The SKAMP-combined score is obtained by summing the rating values for each of the 13 items, whereby the higher the SKAMP score, the greater the impairment. (NCT01986062)
Timeframe: 0.75, 4, 6, 8, 10 hours post-dose
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.75 hours post-dose | 4 hours post-dose | 6 hours post-dose | 8 hours post-dose | 10 hours post-dose | |
AR11 (Amphetamine Sulfate) | 11.8 | 11.6 | 14.5 | 16.0 | 16.5 |
Placebo | 17.3 | 19.8 | 20.2 | 22.0 | 20.8 |
The Conner's Parent Rating Scale-revised short version (CPRS-R) consists of 27 questions graded on a scale from 0 (not true at all) to 3 (very much true) with a total score ranging from 0 to 81. Higher scores are indicative of increased ADHD. This scale allows parents to respond on the basis of the child's behavior and help assess ADHD and evaluate problem behavior. (NCT00151996)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 weeks
Intervention | Units on a Scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Methylphenidate + SPD503 | -22.18 |
Amphetamine + SPD503 | -16.28 |
Change in the Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-fourth edition (ADHD-RS-IV) total score from baseline. The ADHD-RS-IV consists of 18 items scored on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 3 (severe symptoms) with total score ranging from 0 to 54. (NCT00151996)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 weeks
Intervention | Units on a Scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Methylphenidate + SPD503 | -17.8 |
Amphetamine + SPD503 | -13.8 |
Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) consists of a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Improvement is defined as a score of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved) on the scale. (NCT00151996)
Timeframe: 6 weeks
Intervention | Participants (Number) |
---|---|
Methylphenidate + SPD503 | 28 |
Amphetamine + SPD503 | 18 |
Parent Global Assessment (PGA) consists of a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). The PGA is designed to capture parent's opinions of their child's disease (ADHD) severity and improvement. Improvement is defined as a score of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved) on the scale. (NCT00151996)
Timeframe: 6 weeks
Intervention | Participants (Number) |
---|---|
Methylphenidate + SPD503 | 32 |
Amphetamine + SPD503 | 21 |
The Child Health Questionnaire-Parent Form (CHQ-PF50) was developed to measure the physical and psychosocial well-being of children aged 5 years of age and older. Total scoring ranges from 0-100 for each. Increases in scores represent improved well-being in subjects as assessed by their parents. (NCT00151996)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 weeks
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Physical Summary Score | Psychosocial Summary Score | |
Amphetamine + SPD503 | 0.22 | 11.56 |
Methylphenidate + SPD503 | -0.38 | 8.98 |
Dosage adherence (MEMSd) is the number of bottle openings divided by number of doses prescribed. Adherence was measured as ≥ 75% of the doses. The number below is the total percentage of subjects who were adherent. (NCT00468143)
Timeframe: The MEMS information was noted at clinic visit 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, and 9 (over 8 weeks)
Intervention | percentage of participants adherent (Number) |
---|---|
Adderall IR (Methamphetamine Salts) | 42.7 |
Adderall XR (Methamphetamine Salts) | 66.2 |
Regimen adherence (MEMSr) is a percentage of the number of days in which the complete dose regimen was taken as prescribed. Adherence was measured as complete dose regimen taken on ≥ 90% of days. The number below is the total percentage of subjects who were adherent. (NCT00468143)
Timeframe: The MEMS information was noted at clinic visit 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, and 9 (over 8 weeks)
Intervention | percentage of participants adherent (Number) |
---|---|
Adderall IR (Methamphetamine Salts) | 2.5 |
Adderall XR (Methamphetamine Salts) | 34.4 |
Time adherence (MEMSt) is the percentage of doses taken as prescribed within a specified time period. Adherence was measured as ≥ 80% of doses taken at the correct time. The number below is the percentage of subjects who were adherent. (NCT00468143)
Timeframe: The MEMS information was noted at clinic visit 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, and 9 (over 8 weeks)
Intervention | percentage of participants adherent (Number) |
---|---|
Adderall IR (Methamphetamine Salts) | 4.5 |
Adderall XR (Methamphetamine Salts) | 43.7 |
Study staff counted unused medication at each weekly visit to yield a percentage of prescribed pills that were consumed. For each group, the number given will be the total number of consumed pills divided by total number of pill prescribed. (NCT00468143)
Timeframe: At clinic visit 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, and 9 (over 8 weeks)
Intervention | percentage of pills consumed (Number) |
---|---|
Adderall IR (Methamphetamine Salts) | 90.4 |
Adderall XR (Methamphetamine Salts) | 96.9 |
Self-reported adherence was ascertained via retrospective self-report of daily regimen adherence. Participants were considered adherent for Adderall IR (Methamphetamine salts) if they took the first does in the morning within 30 minutes of waking, and then each subsequent dose in 5-hour intervals (within 30 minutes). For Adderall XR (Methamphetamine salts), participants were considered adherent if they took the single daily dose in the morning within 30 minutes of waking. The number given below represents the total number of self-reported adherent participants divided by the total number of participants per group, times 100 (to obtain percentage). (NCT00468143)
Timeframe: At clinic visit 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, and 9 (over 8 weeks)
Intervention | percentage of participants adherent (Number) |
---|---|
Adderall IR (Methamphetamine Salts) | 92.6 |
Adderall XR (Methamphetamine Salts) | 98.8 |
"The ABC-C is a global behavior checklist implemented for the measurement of drug and other treatment effects in populations with intellectual disability. Behavior based on 58 items that describe various behavioral problems.~Each item is rated on the parents perceived severity of the behavior. The answer options for each item are:~0 = Not a problem~= Problem but slight in degree~= Moderately serious problem~= Severe in degree~The measure is broken down into the following subscales with individual ranges as follows:~Subscale I (Irritability): 15 items, score range = 0-45 Subscale II (Lethargy): 16 items, score range = 0-48 Subscale III (Stereotypy): 7 items, score range = 0-21 Subscale IV (Hyperactivity): 16 items, score range = 0-48 Subscale V (Inappropriate Speech) was not included in the breakdown because it was not applicable (no participants in the study had verbal language)." (NCT01777542)
Timeframe: Every 5 weeks during each of the two 20-week treatment periods, and once 4 weeks after final treatment ends
Intervention | units on a scale (Median) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Visit 1 - First Intervention: Subscale I | Visit 3 - First Intervention: Subscale I | Visit 5 - First Intervention: Subscale I | Visit 6 - Second Intervention: Subscale I | Visit 8 - Second Intervention: Subscale I | Visit 10 - Second Intervention: Subscale I | Follow-up: Subscale I (Irritability) | Visit 1 - First Intervention: Subscale II | Visit 3 - First Intervention: Subscale II | Visit 5 - First Intervention: Subscale II | Visit 6 - Second Intervention: Subscale II | Visit 8 - Second Intervention: Subscale II | Visit 10 - Second Intervention: Subscale II | Follow-up: Subscale II (Lethargy) | Visit 1 - First Intervention: Subscale III | Visit 3 - First Intervention: Subscale III | Visit 5 - First Intervention: Subscale III | Visit 6 - Second Intervention: Subscale III | Visit 8 - Second Intervention: Subscale III | Visit 10 - Second Intervention: Subscale III | Follow-up: Subscale III (Stereotypy) | Visit 1 - First Intervention: Subscale IV | Visit 3 - First Intervention: Subscale IV | Visit 5 - First Intervention: Subscale IV | Visit 6 - Second Intervention: Subscale IV | Visit 8 - Second Intervention: Subscale IV | Visit 10 - Second Intervention: Subscale IV | Follow-up: Subscale IV (Hyperactivity) | |
Placebo First, Then rhIGF-1 | 9.00 | 9.00 | 7.00 | 7.00 | 4.00 | 5.00 | 3.00 | 13.00 | 11.00 | 9.00 | 11.00 | 8.00 | 6.00 | 6.00 | 13.00 | 10.00 | 11.00 | 11.00 | 10.00 | 8.00 | 8.00 | 13.00 | 12.00 | 11.00 | 11.00 | 7.00 | 10.00 | 9.00 |
rhIGF-1 First, Then Placebo | 6.00 | 4.00 | 2.00 | 4.00 | 3.00 | 5.00 | 2.00 | 8.00 | 7.00 | 6.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 4.00 | 5.00 | 12.00 | 10.00 | 9.00 | 11.00 | 9.00 | 9.00 | 9.00 | 8.00 | 8.00 | 6.00 | 7.00 | 4.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 |
"Remaining subscales of the ADAMS that are not primary outcome measures include: Manic/hyperactive, Depressed mood, General anxiety, Obsessive/compulsive behavior.~The range for each subscale is as follows:~Manic/Hyperactive Behavior: 0-15 Depressed Mood: 0-21 General Anxiety: 0-21 Obsessive/Compulsive Behavior: 0-9~The higher the score for each subscale, the more problematic the behavior." (NCT01777542)
Timeframe: Every 5 weeks during each of the two 20-week treatment periods, and once 4 weeks after final treatment ends
Intervention | units on a scale (Median) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Visit 1- First Intervention: Manic/Hyperactive | Visit 2- First Intervention: Manic/Hyperactive | Visit 3- First Intervention: Manic/Hyperactive | Visit 4- First Intervention: Manic/Hyperactive | Visit 5- First Intervention: Manic/Hyperactive | Visit 6- Second Intervention: Manic/Hyperactive | Visit 7- Second Intervention: Manic/Hyperactive | Visit 8- Second Intervention: Manic/Hyperactive | Visit 9- Second Intervention: Manic/Hyperactive | Visit 10- First Intervention: Manic/Hyperactive | Follow-up: Manic/Hyperactive Subscale | Visit 1- First Intervention: Depressed Mood | Visit 2- First Intervention: Depressed Mood | Visit 3- First Intervention: Depressed Mood | Visit 4- First Intervention: Depressed Mood | Visit 5- First Intervention: Depressed Mood | Visit 6- Second Intervention: Depressed Mood | Visit 7- Second Intervention: Depressed Mood | Visit 8- Second Intervention: Depressed Mood | Visit 9- Second Intervention: Depressed Mood | Visit 10- Second Intervention: Depressed Mood | Follow-up: Depressed Mood Subscale | Visit 1- First Intervention: General Anxiety | Visit 2- First Intervention: General Anxiety | Visit 3- First Intervention: General Anxiety | Visit 4- First Intervention: General Anxiety | Visit 5- First Intervention: General Anxiety | Visit 6- Second Intervention: General Anxiety | Visit 7- Second Intervention: General Anxiety | Visit 8- Second Intervention: General Anxiety | Visit 9- Second Intervention: General Anxiety | Visit 10- Second Intervention: General Anxiety | Follow-up: General Anxiety Subscale | Visit 1- First Intervention: Obsessive Compulsive | Visit 2- First Intervention: Obsessive Compulsive | Visit 3- First Intervention: Obsessive Compulsive | Visit 4- First Intervention: Obsessive Compulsive | Visit 5- First Intervention: Obsessive Compulsive | Visit 6- Second Intervention: Obsessive Compulsive | Visit 7- Second Intervention: Obsessive Compulsive | Visit 8- Second Intervention: Obsessive Compulsive | Visit 9- Second Intervention: Obsessive Compulsive | Visit 10- First Intervention: Obsessive Compulsive | Follow-up: Obsessive Compulsive Behavior Subscale | |
Placebo First, Then rhIGF-1 | 8.00 | 7.00 | 7.00 | 7.00 | 7.00 | 8.00 | 6.50 | 6.00 | 6.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 2.00 | 4.00 | 3.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 3.00 | 2.00 | 3.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 8.00 | 6.00 | 6.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 6.00 | 6.00 | 6.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 5.50 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 2.00 | 3.50 |
rhIGF-1 First, Then Placebo | 7.00 | 7.00 | 6.00 | 5.00 | 4.00 | 6.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 4.00 | 4.50 | 5.00 | 4.00 | 5.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 2.00 | 3.00 | 3.50 | 6.00 | 7.00 | 6.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 7.00 | 5.00 | 4.00 | 3.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 3.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 2.00 | 2.50 | 3.00 |
"The ADAMS is completed by the parent/caregiver/LAR and consists of 29 items which are scored on a 4-point rating scale that combines frequency and severity ratings. The instructions ask the rater to describe the individual's behavior over the last six months on the following scale: 0 if the behavior has not occurred, 1 if the behavior occurs occasionally or is a mild problem, 2 if the behavior occurs quite often or is moderate problem, or 3 if the behavior occurs a lot or is a severe problem.~The Social Avoidance subscale of the ADAMS will be used as a primary outcome measure for this trial. The range for this subscale is 0-21. The higher the subscale score, the more problematic the behavior." (NCT01777542)
Timeframe: Every 5 weeks during each of the two 20-week treatment periods, and once 4 weeks after final treatment ends
Intervention | units on a scale (Median) | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Visit 1 - First Intervention | Visit 2 - First Intervention | Visit 3 - First Intervention | Visit 4 - First Intervention | Visit 5 - First Intervention | Visit 6 - Second Intervention | Visit 7 - Second Intervention | Visit 8 - Second Intervention | Visit 9 - Second Intervention | Visit 10 - Second Intervention | Follow-up | |
Placebo First, Then rhIGF-1 | 6.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 6.00 | 5.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 3.00 | 3.50 | 4.00 |
rhIGF-1 First, Then Placebo | 4.00 | 5.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 3.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 3.00 | 3.50 | 3.00 |
"Each time the patient was seen after the study intervention was initiated, the clinician compared the patient's overall clinical condition to the CGI-S score obtained at the baseline (visit 1) visit. Based on information collected, the clinician determined if any improvement occurred on the following 7-point scale: 1=Very much improved since the initiation of treatment; 2=Much improved; 3=Minimally improved; 4=No change from baseline (the initiation of treatment); 5=Minimally worse; 6=Much worse; 7=Very much worse since the initiation of treatment.~The possible range for reported scores is 1-7." (NCT01777542)
Timeframe: Every 10 weeks during each of the two 20-week treatment periods
Intervention | units on a scale (Median) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Visit 3 - First Intervention | Visit 5 - First Intervention | Visit 6 - Second Intervention | Visit 8 - Second Intervention | Visit 10 - Second Intervention | |
Placebo First, Then rhIGF-1 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 |
rhIGF-1 First, Then Placebo | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 |
"This scale is used to judge the severity of the subject's disease prior to entry into the study. The clinician will rate the severity of behavioral symptoms at baseline on a 7-point scale from not impaired to the most impaired.~The scores that correspond to each possible grouping are as follows: 1=Normal, not at all impaired; 2=Borderline impaired; 3=Mildly impaired; 4=Moderately impaired; 5=Markedly impaired; 6=Severely impaired; 7=The most impaired.~The possible range for reported scores is 1-7." (NCT01777542)
Timeframe: Every 10 weeks during each of the two 20-week treatment periods
Intervention | units on a scale (Median) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Visit 1 - First Intervention | Visit 3 - First Intervention | Visit 5 - First Intervention | Visit 6 - Second Intervention | Visit 8 - Second Intervention | Visit 10 - Second Intervention | |
Placebo First, Then rhIGF-1 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 |
rhIGF-1 First, Then Placebo | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.50 |
"The CSBS-DP was designed to measure early communication and symbolic skills in infants and young children (that is, functional communication skills of 6 month to 2 year olds). The CSBS-DP measures skills from three composites: (a) Social (emotion, eye gaze, and communication); (b) Speech (sounds and words); and (c) Symbolic (understanding and object use) and asks about developmental milestones. The data reported are the composite scores for these three categories.~The possible scores for the three composite categories are as follows:~Social Composite = 0-48; Speech Composite = 0-40; Symbolic Composite = 0-51.~A higher score indicates more advanced abilities in that area." (NCT01777542)
Timeframe: Every 5 weeks during each of the two 20-week treatment periods, and once 4 weeks after final treatment ends
Intervention | units on a scale (Median) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Visit 1 - First Intervention: Social | Visit 2: Social Composite Score | Visit 3: Social Composite Score | Visit 4: Social Composite Score | Visit 5: Social Composite Score | Visit 6 - Second Intervention: Social | Visit 7 - Second Intervention: Social | Visit 8 - Second Intervention: Social | Visit 9 - Second Intervention: Social | Visit 10 - Second Intervention: Social | Follow-up: Social Composite Score | Visit 1 - First Intervention: Speech | Visit 2 - First Intervention: Speech | Visit 3 - First Intervention: Speech | Visit 4 - First Intervention: Speech | Visit 5 - First Intervention: Speech | Visit 6 - Second Intervention: Speech | Visit 7 - Second Intervention: Speech | Visit 8 - Second Intervention: Speech | Visit 9 - Second Intervention: Speech | Visit 10 - Second Intervention: Speech | Follow-up: Speech Composite Score | Visit 1 - First Intervention: Symbolic | Visit 2 - First Intervention: Symbolic | Visit 3 - First Intervention: Symbolic | Visit 4 - First Intervention: Symbolic | Visit 5 - First Intervention: Symbolic | Visit 6 - Second Intervention: Symbolic | Visit 7 - Second Intervention: Symbolic | Visit 8 - Second Intervention: Symbolic | Visit 9 - Second Intervention: Symbolic | Visit 10 - Second Intervention: Symbolic | Follow-up: Symbolic Composite Score | |
Placebo First, Then rhIGF-1 | 19.00 | 20.00 | 18.00 | 18.00 | 20.00 | 18.00 | 20.00 | 21.00 | 21.00 | 22.50 | 22.50 | 4.00 | 3.00 | 5.00 | 5.50 | 6.50 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 6.00 | 9.50 | 10.50 | 10.50 | 12.00 | 11.50 | 13.00 | 10.25 | 11.50 | 11.50 | 13.75 | 14.25 |
rhIGF-1 First, Then Placebo | 22.00 | 24.00 | 24.00 | 24.00 | 23.00 | 28.00 | 25.00 | 27.00 | 29.00 | 27.00 | 28.00 | 7.00 | 5.00 | 8.00 | 5.00 | 8.00 | 8.50 | 7.00 | 6.50 | 5.00 | 7.25 | 6.00 | 14.00 | 14.50 | 15.00 | 14.00 | 16.50 | 18.50 | 17.00 | 17.00 | 18.00 | 17.00 | 18.00 |
"The Kerr clinical severity scale (Kerr scale) is a quantitative measure of global disease severity. The Kerr scale is a summation of individual items related to Rett syndrome phenotypic characteristics. The items are based on the severity or degree of abnormality of each characteristic on a discrete scale (0, 1, 2) with the highest level corresponding to the most severe or most abnormal presentations.~The possible range of scores is 0-48. The higher the score, the more severe the symptoms." (NCT01777542)
Timeframe: At the start and end of each 20-week treatment period
Intervention | units on a scale (Median) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Visit 1 - First Intervention | Visit 5 - First Intervention | Visit 6 - Second Intervention | Visit 10 - Second Intervention | |
Placebo First, Then rhIGF-1 | 16.50 | 15.00 | 15.00 | 14.00 |
rhIGF-1 First, Then Placebo | 18.00 | 18.00 | 19.00 | 20.00 |
"The MSEL is a standardized developmental test for children ages 3 to 68 months consisting of five subscales: gross motor, fine motor, visual reception, expressive language, and receptive language.~The raw score is reported for each subscale domain. The potential score ranges are as follows:~Visual Reception: 33 items, score range=0-50, Fine Motor: 30 items, score range= 0-49, Receptive Language: 33 items, score range= 0-48, Expressive Language: 28 items, score range= 0-50. The gross motor subscale was not included in this population.~A higher raw score indicates more advanced abilities in that section." (NCT01777542)
Timeframe: At the start and end of each 20-week treatment period
Intervention | units on a scale (Median) | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Visit 1- First Intervention: Visual Reception | Visit 5- First Intervention: Visual Reception | Visit 6- Second Intervention: Visual Reception | Visit 10: Visual Reception Raw Score | Visit 1- First Intervention: Fine Motor | Visit 5- First Intervention: Fine Motor | Visit 6- Second Intervention: Fine Motor | Visit 10- Second Intervention: Fine Motor | Visit 1- First Intervention: Receptive Language | Visit 5- First Intervention: Receptive Language | Visit 6- Second Intervention: Receptive Language | Visit 10- Second Intervention: Receptive Language | Visit 1- First Intervention: Expressive Language | Visit 5- First Intervention: Expressive Language | Visit 6- Second Intervention: Expressive Language | Visit 10- Second Intervention: Expressive Language | |
Placebo First, Then rhIGF-1 | 17.00 | 26.00 | 23.00 | 28.00 | 10.00 | 9.00 | 11.00 | 9.00 | 20.00 | 30.00 | 31.00 | 31.00 | 8.00 | 9.00 | 6.00 | 8.00 |
rhIGF-1 First, Then Placebo | 26.00 | 39.50 | 42.00 | 44.00 | 7.00 | 7.00 | 10.00 | 8.50 | 25.50 | 32.00 | 38.00 | 36.50 | 9.00 | 8.00 | 10.00 | 8.00 |
"The parent or caretaker identifies the three most troublesome, RTT-specific, target symptoms, such as inattention or breath-holding. This allows the problems that are of concern to parents and the family to be targeted in the trial. In this study the caregiver will choose three target symptoms at baseline and then rate changes in severity of each target symptom on a visual analog scale (VAS).~The VAS is a 10 cm line, where a target symptom is anchored on one end with the description the best it has ever been and on the other with the description the worst it has ever been. The parent was asked to marked on the line where they felt their child's symptoms currently fit best. This mark was measured as recorded as a numeric value from 0.00-10.00 cm. The higher the value, the worse the symptom." (NCT01777542)
Timeframe: Every 5 weeks during each of the two 20-week treatment periods, and once 4 weeks after final treatment ends
Intervention | units on a scale (Median) | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Visit 1 - First Intervention | Visit 2 - First Intervention | Visit 3 - First Intervention | Visit 4 - First Intervention | Visit 5 - First Intervention | Visit 6 - Second Intervention | Visit 7 - Second Intervention | Visit 8 - Second Intervention | Visit 9 - Second Intervention | Visit 10 - Second Intervention | Follow-up | |
Placebo First, Then rhIGF-1 | 6.50 | 4.70 | 5.65 | 5.05 | 4.80 | 4.95 | 4.55 | 5.65 | 4.15 | 4.80 | 5.60 |
rhIGF-1 First, Then Placebo | 8.80 | 4.80 | 5.35 | 5.10 | 5.15 | 5.20 | 4.65 | 5.00 | 5.15 | 5.05 | 5.08 |
"The parent or caretaker identifies the three most troublesome, RTT-specific, target symptoms, such as inattention or breath-holding. This allows the problems that are of concern to parents and the family to be targeted in the trial. In this study the caregiver will choose three target symptoms at baseline and then rate changes in severity of each target symptom on a visual analog scale (VAS).~The VAS is a 10 cm line, where a target symptom is anchored on one end with the description the best it has ever been and on the other with the description the worst it has ever been. The parent was asked to marked on the line where they felt their child's symptoms currently fit best. This mark was measured as recorded as a numeric value from 0.00-10.00 cm. The higher the value, the worse the symptom." (NCT01777542)
Timeframe: Every 5 weeks during each of the two 20-week treatment periods, and once 4 weeks after final treatment ends
Intervention | units on a scale (Median) | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Visit 1 - First Intervention | Visit 2 - First Intervention | Visit 3 - First Intervention | Visit 4 - First Intervention | Visit 5 - First Intervention | Visit 6 - Second Intervention | Visit 7 - Second Intervention | Visit 8 - Second Intervention | Visit 9 - Second Intervention | Visit 10 - Second Intervention | Follow-up | |
Placebo First, Then rhIGF-1 | 7.75 | 4.50 | 5.85 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.35 | 5.50 | 5.15 | 3.80 | 4.90 | 5.15 |
rhIGF-1 First, Then Placebo | 6.35 | 5.25 | 5.95 | 5.40 | 5.45 | 7.10 | 5.85 | 5.00 | 5.13 | 4.95 | 5.20 |
"The parent or caretaker identifies the three most troublesome, RTT-specific, target symptoms, such as inattention or breath-holding. This allows the problems that are of concern to parents and the family to be targeted in the trial. In this study the caregiver will choose three target symptoms at baseline and then rate changes in severity of each target symptom on a visual analog scale (VAS).~The VAS is a 10 cm line, where a target symptom is anchored on one end with the description the best it has ever been and on the other with the description the worst it has ever been. The parent was asked to marked on the line where they felt their child's symptoms currently fit best. This mark was measured as recorded as a numeric value from 0.00-10.00 cm. The higher the value, the worse the symptom." (NCT01777542)
Timeframe: Every 5 weeks during each of the two 20-week treatment periods, and once 4 weeks after final treatment ends
Intervention | units on a scale (Median) | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Visit 1 - First Intervention | Visit 2 - First Intervention | Visit 3 - First Intervention | Visit 4 - First Intervention | Visit 5 - First Intervention | Visit 6 - Second Intervention | Visit 7 - Second Intervention | Visit 8 - Second Intervention | Visit 9 - Second Intervention | Visit 10 - Second Intervention | Follow-up | |
Placebo First, Then rhIGF-1 | 7.85 | 4.70 | 5.65 | 4.15 | 5.00 | 6.20 | 4.80 | 4.85 | 4.60 | 4.13 | 4.55 |
rhIGF-1 First, Then Placebo | 5.70 | 5.00 | 5.20 | 5.35 | 5.10 | 5.35 | 4.95 | 5.15 | 5.25 | 4.55 | 5.10 |
"As part of each visit after the study intervention was initiated, the parent/caregiver was asked to compare the patient's overall clinical condition to the score obtained at the baseline (visit 1) visit. Based on information collected, the clinician determined if any improvement occurred on the following 7-point scale: 1=Very much improved since the initiation of treatment; 2=Much improved; 3=Minimally improved; 4=No change from baseline (the initiation of treatment); 5=Minimally worse; 6=Much worse; 7=Very much worse since the initiation of treatment.~The possible range for reported scores is 1-7." (NCT01777542)
Timeframe: Every 5 weeks during each of the two 20-week treatment periods, and once 4 weeks after final treatment ends
Intervention | units on a scale (Median) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Visit 2 - First Intervention | Visit 3 - First Intervention | Visit 4 - First Intervention | Visit 5 - First Intervention | Visit 6 - Second Intervention | Visit 7 - Second Intervention | Visit 8 - Second Intervention | Visit 9 - Second Intervention | Visit 10 - Second Intervention | Follow-up | |
Placebo First, Then rhIGF-1 | 4.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 4.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 |
rhIGF-1 First, Then Placebo | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 |
"The PGI-S is the parent version of the CGI-S. Parents/caregivers/LAR are asked to rate the severity of their child's symptoms at baseline on a 7-point scale from not at all impaired to the most impaired. The parents/caregivers/LAR will complete the PGI-S at each study visit.~The scores that correspond to each possible grouping are as follows:~1=Normal, not at all impaired; 2=Borderline impaired; 3=Mildly impaired; 4=Moderately impaired; 5=Markedly impaired; 6=Severely impaired; 7=The most impaired.~The possible range for reported scores is 1-7." (NCT01777542)
Timeframe: Every 5 weeks during each of the two 20-week treatment periods, and once 4 weeks after final treatment ends
Intervention | units on a scale (Median) | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Visit 1 - First Intervention | Visit 2 - First Intervention | Visit 3 - First Intervention | Visit 4 - First Intervention | Visit 5 - First Intervention | Visit 6 - Second Intervention | Visit 7 - Second Intervention | Visit 8 - Second Intervention | Visit 9 - Second Intervention | Visit 10 - Second Intervention | Follow-up | |
Placebo First, Then rhIGF-1 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 |
rhIGF-1 First, Then Placebo | 6.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 6.00 | 6.00 | 5.00 | 4.00 |
"Respiratory data was collected using non-invasive respiratory inductance plethysmography from a BioCapture® recording device. BioCapture® is a child-friendly measurement device that can record from 1 to 12 physiological signal transducers in a time-locked manner. It can be configured with the pediatric chest and abdominal plethysmography bands and the 3 lead ECG signals we plan to use for monitoring cardiac safety throughout the study. Each transducer is placed on the patient independently to provide a customized fit that yields the highest signal quality for each patient irrespective of body shape and proportion. The transducer signals captured by the BioCapture® are transmitted wirelessly to a laptop computer where all signals are displayed in real-time.~The apnea index is given as apneas/hour. Data on apneas greater than or equal to 10 seconds are displayed below. The higher the frequency of apnea, the more severe the breathing abnormality." (NCT01777542)
Timeframe: Every 10 weeks during each of the two 20-week treatment periods
Intervention | Apneas/Hour (Median) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Visit 1 - First Intervention: Apnea Index | Visit 3 - First Intervention: Apnea Index | Visit 5 - First Intervention: Apnea Index | Visit 6 - Second Intervention: Apnea Index | Visit 8 - Second Intervention: Apnea Index | Visit 10 - Second Intervention: Apnea Index | |
Placebo First, Then rhIGF-1 | 7.58 | 4.80 | 6.93 | 7.90 | 7.28 | 8.91 |
rhIGF-1 First, Then Placebo | 4.05 | 3.48 | 3.07 | 3.62 | 5.55 | 5.56 |
"The RSBQ is a parent-completed measure of abnormal behaviors typically observed in individuals with RTT. Each item, grouped into eight subscales, is scored on a Likert scale of 0-2, according to how well the item describes the individual's behavior. A score of 0 indicates the described item is not true, a score of 1 indicates the described item is somewhat or sometimes true, and a score of 2 indicates the described item is very true or often true.~The total sum of each subscale is reported. The higher the score, the more severe the symptoms of that subscale in the participant.~The range for each subscale is as follows:~General Mood: 0-16 Body rocking and expressionless face: 0-14 Hand behaviors: 0-12 Breathing Problems: 0-10 Repetitive Face Movements: 0-8 Night-time behaviors: 0-6 Walking Standing: 0-4~The fear/anxiety subscale was used as a primary outcome measure in this study and results can be found in that section." (NCT01777542)
Timeframe: Every 5 weeks during each of the two 20-week treatment periods, and once 4 weeks after final treatment ends
Intervention | units on a scale (Median) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Visit 1- First Intervention: General Mood | Visit 2- First Intervention: General Mood | Visit 3- First Intervention: General Mood | Visit 4- First Intervention: General Mood | Visit 5- First Intervention: General Mood | Visit 6- Second Intervention: General Mood | Visit 7- Second Intervention: General Mood | Visit 8- Second Intervention: General Mood | Visit 9- Second Intervention: General Mood | Visit 10- Second Intervention: General Mood | Follow-up: General Mood | Visit 1- First Intervention: Body Rocking | Visit 2- First Intervention: Body Rocking | Visit 3- First Intervention: Body Rocking | Visit 4- First Intervention: Body Rocking | Visit 5- First Intervention: Body Rocking | Visit 6- Second Intervention: Body Rocking | Visit 7- Second Intervention: Body Rocking | Visit 8- Second Intervention: Body Rocking | Visit 9- Second Intervention: Body Rocking | Visit 10- Second Intervention: Body Rocking | Followup: Body Rocking | Visit 1- First Intervention: Hand Behaviors | Visit 2- First Intervention: Hand Behaviors | Visit 3- First Intervention: Hand Behaviors | Visit 4- First Intervention: Hand Behaviors | Visit 5- First Intervention: Hand Behaviors | Visit 6- Second Intervention: Hand Behaviors | Visit 7- Second Intervention: Hand Behaviors | Visit 8- Second Intervention: Hand Behaviors | Visit 9- Second Intervention: Hand Behaviors | Visit 10- Second Intervention: Hand Behaviors | Follow-up: Hand Behaviors | Visit 1- First Intervention: Breathing Problems | Visit 2- First Intervention: Breathing Problems | Visit 3- First Intervention: Breathing Problems | Visit 4- First Intervention: Breathing Problems | Visit 5- First Intervention: Breathing Problems | Visit 6- Second Intervention: Breathing Problems | Visit 7- Second Intervention: Breathing Problems | Visit 8- Second Intervention: Breathing Problems | Visit 9- Second Intervention: Breathing Problems | Visit 10- Second Intervention: Breathing Problems | Follow-up: Breathing Problems | Visit 1- First Intervention: Repetitive Face Movem | Visit 2- First Intervention: Repetitive Face Movem | Visit 3- First Intervention: Repetitive Face Movem | Visit 4- First Intervention: Repetitive Face Movem | Visit 5- First Intervention: Repetitive Face Movem | Visit 6- Second Intervention: Repetitive Face Mov | Visit 7- Second Intervention: Repetitive Face Mov | Visit 8- Second Intervention: Repetitive Face Mov | Visit 9- Second Intervention: Repetitive Face Mov | Visit 10- Second Intervention: Repetitive Face Mov | Follow-up: Repetitive Face Movements | Visit 1- First Intervention: Night time Behaviors | Visit 2- First Intervention: Night time Behaviors | Visit 3- First Intervention: Night time Behaviors | Visit 4- First Intervention: Night time Behaviors | Visit 5- First Intervention: Night time Behaviors | Visit 6- Second Intervention: Night time Behavior | Visit 7- Second Intervention: Night time Behavior | Visit 8- Second Intervention: Night time Behavior | Visit 9- Second Intervention: Night time Behavior | Visit 10- Second Intervention: Night time Behavior | Follow-up: Night time Behaviors | Visit 1- First Intervention: Walking/Standing | Visit 2- First Intervention: Walking/Standing | Visit 3- First Intervention: Walking/Standing | Visit 4- First Intervention: Walking/Standing | Visit 5- First Intervention: Walking/Standing | Visit 6- Second Intervention: Walking/Standing | Visit 7- Second Intervention: Walking/Standing | Visit 8- Second Intervention: Walking/Standing | Visit 9- Second Intervention: Walking/Standing | Visit 10- Second Intervention: Walking/Standing | Follow-up: Walking/Standing | |
Placebo First, Then rhIGF-1 | 7.00 | 5.00 | 6.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 4.00 | 5.50 | 5.00 | 6.00 | 4.00 | 5.50 | 6.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 6.00 | 5.00 | 4.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 4.00 | 5.00 | 4.50 | 8.00 | 9.00 | 8.00 | 8.00 | 8.00 | 9.00 | 8.00 | 8.00 | 8.00 | 7.00 | 7.50 | 6.00 | 4.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 6.00 | 4.50 | 6.00 | 5.00 | 6.00 | 5.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 3.00 | 2.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 2.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 3.00 | 1.50 | 2.00 |
rhIGF-1 First, Then Placebo | 4.00 | 3.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 3.00 | 4.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1.00 | 2.50 | 2.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 3.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 3.00 | 4.00 | 3.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 8.00 | 8.00 | 8.00 | 9.00 | 9.00 | 8.00 | 9.00 | 9.00 | 7.00 | 9.00 | 8.50 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 5.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 4.00 | 3.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 3.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 3.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1.50 | 2.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 |
"The RSBQ is an informant/parent-completed measure of abnormal behaviors typically observed in individuals with RTT, which is completed by a parent/caregiver/LAR. Each item, grouped into eight domains/factors: General mood, Breathing problems, Body rocking and expressionless face, Hand behaviors, Repetitive face movements, Night-time behaviors, Fear/anxiety and Walking/standing), is scored on a Likert scale of 0-2, according to how well the item describes the individual's behavior. A score of 0 indicates the described item is not true, a score of 1 indicates the described item is somewhat or sometimes true, and a score of 2 indicates the described item is very true or often true.~The total sum of items in each subscale is reported.~For the fear/anxiety subscale, the sum total could be between 0-8. The higher the sum total score, the greater the frequency of fear/anxiety behaviors." (NCT01777542)
Timeframe: Every 5 weeks during each of the two 20-week treatment periods, and once 4 weeks after final treatment ends
Intervention | units on a scale (Median) | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Visit 1 - First Intervention | Visit 2 - First Intervention | Visit 3 - First Intervention | Visit 4 - First Intervention | Visit 5 - First Intervention | Visit 6 - Second Intervention | Visit 7 - Second Intervention | Visit 8 - Second Intervention | Visit 9 - Second Intervention | Visit 10 - Second Intervention | Follow-up | |
Placebo First, Then rhIGF-1 | 4.00 | 5.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 3.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 4.00 | 3.50 |
rhIGF-1 First, Then Placebo | 5.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 4.00 | 3.00 | 4.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.50 |
"The VABS-II is a survey designed to assess personal and social functioning. Within each domain (Communication, Daily Living Skills, Socialization, and Motor Skills), items can given a score of 2 if the participant successfully performs the activity usually; a 1 if the participant successfully performs the activity sometimes, or needs reminders; a 0 if the participant never performs the activity, and a DK if the parent/caregiver is unsure of the participant's ability for an item.~The raw scores in each sub-domain are reported and the ranges for these are as follows: [Communication Domain], Receptive Language=0-40, Expressive Language=0-108, Written Language=0-50; [Daily Living Skills Domain], Personal=0-82, Domestic=0-48, Community=0-88; [Socialization Domain], Interpersonal Relationships=0-76, Play and Leisure Time=0-62, Coping Skills=0-60; [Motor Skills Domain]: Gross Motor Skills=0-80, Fine Motor Skills=0-72.~A higher score indicates more advanced abilities." (NCT01777542)
Timeframe: At the start and end of each 20-week treatment period
Intervention | units on a scale (Median) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Visit 1 - First Intervention: Receptive | Visit 5 - First Intervention: Receptive | Visit 6 - Second Intervention: Receptive Language | Visit 10 - Second Intervention: Receptive Language | Visit 1 - First Intervention: Expressive | Visit 5 - First Intervention: Expressive | Visit 6 - Second Intervention: Expressive Lang. | Visit 10 - Second Intervention: Expressive Lang. | Visit 1 - First Intervention: Written | Visit 5 - First Intervention: Written | Visit 6: - Second Intervention Written Language | Visit 10 - Second Intervention: Written Language | Visit 1 - First Intervention: Personal | Visit 5 - First Intervention: Personal | Visit 6 - Second Intervention: Personal | Visit 10 - Second Intervention: Personal | Visit 1 - First Intervention: Domestic | Visit 5 - First Intervention: Domestic | Visit 6 - Second Intervention: Domestic | Visit 10 - Second Intervention: Domestic | Visit 1 - First Intervention: Community | Visit 5 - First Intervention: Community | Visit 6 - Second Intervention: Community | Visit 10 - Second Intervention: Community | Visit 1 - First Intervention: Interpersonal Rel. | Visit 5 - First Intervention: Interpersonal Rel. | Visit 6 - Second Intervention: Interpersonal Rel. | Visit 10 - Second Intervention: Interpersonal Rel. | Visit 1 - First Intervention: Play and Leisure | Visit 5 - First Intervention: Play and Leisure | Visit 6 - Second Intervention: Play and Leisure | Visit 10 - Second Intervention: Play and Leisure | Visit 1 - First Intervention: Coping Skills | Visit 5 - First Intervention: Coping Skills | Visit 6 - Second Intervention: Coping Skills | Visit 10 - Second Intervention: Coping Skills | Visit 1 - First Intervention: Gross Motor | Visit 5 - First Intervention: Gross Motor | Visit 6 - Second Intervention: Gross Motor | Visit 10 - Second Intervention: Gross Motor | Visit 1 - First Intervention: Fine Motor | Visit 5 - First Intervention: Fine Motor | Visit 6 - Second Intervention: Fine Motor | Visit 10 - Second Intervention: Fine Motor | |
Placebo First, Then rhIGF-1 | 13.00 | 15.00 | 18.00 | 20.00 | 16.00 | 17.00 | 18.00 | 20.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 6.00 | 9.00 | 10.00 | 9.00 | 10.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 2.00 | 18.00 | 18.00 | 19.00 | 20.00 | 8.00 | 11.00 | 12.00 | 11.00 | 3.00 | 2.00 | 3.00 | 4.00 | 31.00 | 34.00 | 27.00 | 27.00 | 6.00 | 6.00 | 7.00 | 5.00 |
rhIGF-1 First, Then Placebo | 18.00 | 21.00 | 22.00 | 24.50 | 18.00 | 22.00 | 25.00 | 24.00 | 4.00 | 5.00 | 7.00 | 7.00 | 8.00 | 9.00 | 8.50 | 9.50 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 21.00 | 22.00 | 21.00 | 22.50 | 13.00 | 12.00 | 13.00 | 12.50 | 3.00 | 4.00 | 6.00 | 4.50 | 10.00 | 10.00 | 11.50 | 10.50 | 2.00 | 3.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 |
61 reviews available for amphetamine and ADDH
Article | Year |
---|---|
NLS-3 (Levophacetoperane or (
Topics: Adolescent; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimu | 2024 |
Do ADHD Treatments Improve Executive Behavior Beyond Core ADHD Symptoms in Adults? Evidence From Systematic Analysis of Clinical Trials.
Topics: Adult; Amphetamine; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Centra | 2023 |
Polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children and adolescents.
Topics: Adolescent; Amphetamine; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; C | 2023 |
Pharmacologic treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in adults: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Topics: Adult; Amphetamine; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Bayes | 2020 |
Brief history of the medical and non-medical use of amphetamine-like psychostimulants.
Topics: Altitude Sickness; Amphetamine; Animals; Armed Conflicts; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactiv | 2021 |
Safety of Treatments for ADHD in Adults: Pairwise and Network Meta-Analyses.
Topics: Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors; Adult; Amphetamine; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Attention Deficit Disor | 2019 |
Risk of Irritability With Psychostimulant Treatment in Children With ADHD: A Meta-Analysis.
Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child | 2017 |
The pharmacology of amphetamine and methylphenidate: Relevance to the neurobiology of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and other psychiatric comorbidities.
Topics: Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors; Amphetamine; Animals; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; B | 2018 |
Efficacy, Acceptability, and Tolerability of Lisdexamfetamine, Mixed Amphetamine Salts, Methylphenidate, and Modafinil in the Treatment of Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Topics: Adult; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants | 2019 |
New Formulations of Stimulants: An Update for Clinicians.
Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child | 2019 |
Amphetamine, past and present--a pharmacological and clinical perspective.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Amphetamine; Amphetamine-Related Disorders; Animals; Attention Deficit Disorder w | 2013 |
Is the treatment with psychostimulants in children and adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder harmful for the dopaminergic system?
Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Brain; Central Nervous System S | 2013 |
Effect of psychostimulants on brain structure and function in ADHD: a qualitative literature review of magnetic resonance imaging-based neuroimaging studies.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Brain; Central Nervou | 2013 |
Genetic targeting of the amphetamine and methylphenidate-sensitive dopamine transporter: on the path to an animal model of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.
Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulan | 2014 |
Meta-Analysis: Risk of Tics Associated With Psychostimulant Use in Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trials.
Topics: Adolescent; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimu | 2015 |
Racemic amphetamine sulfate (Evekeo) for ADHD.
Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Anorexia; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Child; Humans; Random | 2015 |
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate: Prodrug Delivery, Amphetamine Exposure and Duration of Efficacy.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; | 2016 |
To meta-analyze or not to meta-analyze? A combined meta-analysis of N-of-1 trial data with RCT data on amphetamines and methylphenidate for pediatric ADHD.
Topics: Adolescent; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Biomedical Research; Child; | 2016 |
N-of-1 trials can be aggregated to generate group mean treatment effects: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Topics: Adolescent; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Child; Child, Preschool; Fem | 2016 |
Safety and efficacy considerations due to misuse of extended-release formulations of stimulant medications.
Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Dosag | 2016 |
Effect of stimulants on height and weight: a review of the literature.
Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Body Height; Body Weight; Central Nervou | 2008 |
Potential adverse effects of amphetamine treatment on brain and behavior: a review.
Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Behavior; Brain; Central Nervou | 2009 |
Evolution of stimulants to treat ADHD: transdermal methylphenidate.
Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervo | 2009 |
Amfetamine for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in people with intellectual disabilities.
Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child | 2009 |
Attention-deficit-hyperactivity disorder: an update.
Topics: Adolescent; Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors; Adult; Amphetamine; Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generati | 2009 |
The neuropharmacology of ADHD drugs in vivo: insights on efficacy and safety.
Topics: Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors; Amphetamine; Animals; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Attention Deficit Dis | 2009 |
Safety of stimulant treatment in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: Part I.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous Syste | 2009 |
The reverse operation of Na(+)/Cl(-)-coupled neurotransmitter transporters--why amphetamines take two to tango.
Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulan | 2010 |
Progress and promise of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder pharmacogenetics.
Topics: Amphetamine; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Catechol O-Me | 2010 |
What are the cognitive effects of stimulant medications? Emphasis on adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).
Topics: Achievement; Adult; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous Syst | 2010 |
Understanding the effects of stimulant medications on cognition in individuals with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: a decade of progress.
Topics: Amphetamine; Attention; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimul | 2011 |
Cognitive enhancers for the treatment of ADHD.
Topics: Adult; Amphetamine; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Child; | 2011 |
Revisiting clonidine: an innovative add-on option for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
Topics: Adolescent; Adrenergic alpha-Agonists; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; B | 2012 |
Amfetamine and methylphenidate medications for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: complementary treatment options.
Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child | 2012 |
Long-term efficacy and safety of treatment with stimulants and atomoxetine in adult ADHD: a review of controlled and naturalistic studies.
Topics: Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors; Adult; Amphetamine; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Attention Deficit Disor | 2013 |
New medications for treatment of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: review and commentary.
Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child | 2002 |
Novel treatments for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children.
Topics: Adolescent; Age Factors; Amphetamine; Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic; Antihypertensive Agents; Ato | 2002 |
Experimental investigations on dopamine transmission can provide clues on the mechanism of the therapeutic effect of amphetamine and methylphenidate in ADHD.
Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Disease Models, Animal; Dopamin | 2004 |
Recognizing and managing bipolar disorder in children.
Topics: Adolescent; Age Factors; Amphetamine; Anticonvulsants; Antipsychotic Agents; Attention Deficit Disor | 2005 |
Pharmacotherapy of adult ADHD.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Age Factors; Amphetamine; Antidepressive Agents; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Atten | 2005 |
Righting a troubled course. Diagnosing and treating ADHD in adults.
Topics: Adult; Age Factors; Amphetamine; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperact | 2005 |
NTP-CERHR monograph on the potential human reproductive and developmental effects of amphetamines.
Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Behavior, Animal; Central Nervo | 2005 |
Regulated expression and function of the somatodendritic catecholamine neurotransmitter transporters.
Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Catecholamines; Central Nervous | 2005 |
Update on amphetamine neurotoxicity and its relevance to the treatment of ADHD.
Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Brain; Central Nervous System S | 2007 |
The consequences of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in adults.
Topics: Achievement; Adult; Age Factors; Amphetamine; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Attention Deficit Disorder | 2007 |
ADHD, substance use disorders, and psychostimulant treatment: current literature and treatment guidelines.
Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child | 2008 |
New perspectives from microdialysis studies in freely-moving, spontaneously hypertensive rats on the pharmacology of drugs for the treatment of ADHD.
Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Dise | 2008 |
Current concepts of abnormal motor disorder: an experimental model of attentional deficit disorder.
Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Antipsychotic Agents; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Avoidance | 1981 |
Animal models related to developmental disorders: theoretical and pharmacological analyses.
Topics: 5,7-Dihydroxytryptamine; Amphetamine; Animals; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Brain; | 1981 |
Anti-hyperactivity medication: methylphenidate and amphetamine.
Topics: Adult; Amino Acid Sequence; Amphetamine; Animals; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Cen | 1998 |
[Hyperkinetic syndrome in childhood and adolescence. Diagnosis and therapy].
Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Child; Combined Modality Therapy; Humans | 1991 |
Adolescent outcome of hyperactive children treated with stimulants in childhood: a review.
Topics: Achievement; Adolescent; Amphetamine; Antisocial Personality Disorder; Attention Deficit Disorder wi | 1985 |
Prevalence and efficacy of stimulant drug use with mentally retarded children and youth.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous | 1985 |
Treating problem children with stimulant drugs.
Topics: Adult; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants | 1973 |
Drug therapy in minimal brain dysfunction: a commentary.
Topics: Amphetamine; Anticonvulsants; Antidepressive Agents; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; | 1972 |
Some speculations concerning a possible biochemical basis of minimal brain dysfunction.
Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Arousal; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Avoidance Learning; Br | 1973 |
How amphetamine acts in minimal brain dysfunction.
Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Behavior, Animal; Brain; Brain | 1973 |
Genetic approaches to the syndrome of minimal brain dysfunction.
Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Child; Dextroamphetamine; Diseases in Tw | 1973 |
Minimal brain dysfunction in children. Diagnosis and management.
Topics: Abnormalities, Multiple; Affective Symptoms; Age Factors; Amphetamine; Attention; Attention Deficit | 1973 |
Some speculations concerning a possible biochemical basis of minimal brain dysfunction.
Topics: Acute Disease; Amphetamine; Animals; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Behavior; Behavi | 1974 |
Biogenic amines and psychiatry.
Topics: 5-Hydroxytryptophan; Affective Symptoms; Amines; Amphetamine; Anxiety Disorders; Attention Deficit D | 1971 |
41 trials available for amphetamine and ADDH
Article | Year |
---|---|
Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of SHP465 Mixed Amphetamine Salts After Administration of Multiple Daily Doses in Children Aged 4-5 Years with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Amphetamine; Area Under Curve; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; | 2022 |
Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Fixed-Dose Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Amphetamine Extended-Release Tablets in Adults With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.
Topics: Adult; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants | 2022 |
Improved Executive Function in Adults Diagnosed With Attention-Deficit/ Hyperactivity Disorder as Measured by the Brown Attention-Deficit Disorder Scale Following Treatment With SHP465 Mixed Amphetamine Salts Extended-Release: Post Hoc Analyses From 2 Ran
Topics: Adult; Amphetamine; Attention; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System | 2022 |
Assessing Palatability of a New Amphetamine Extended-Release Tablet Formulation for the Treatment of ADHD.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Ner | 2021 |
A Long-Term, Open-Label, Safety Study of Triple-Bead Mixed Amphetamine Salts (SHP465) in Adults With ADHD.
Topics: Adult; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants | 2020 |
Triple-Bead Mixed Amphetamine Salts (SHP465) in Adults With ADHD: Results of a Phase 3, Double-Blind, Randomized, Forced-Dose Trial.
Topics: Adult; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants | 2020 |
Efficacy and Safety of SHP465 Mixed Amphetamine Salts in the Treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Adults: Results of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Forced-Dose Clinical Study.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous Syste | 2017 |
A Randomized Phase I Study to Assess the Effect of Alcohol on the Pharmacokinetics of an Extended-release Orally Disintegrating Tablet Formulation of Amphetamine in Healthy Adults.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Ner | 2017 |
A Single-Dose, Two-Way Crossover, Open-Label Bioequivalence Study of an Amphetamine Extended-Release Oral Suspension in Healthy Adults.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Cross-Over | 2020 |
Efficacy and Safety of Amphetamine Extended-Release Oral Suspension in Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.
Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child | 2018 |
Early-Onset Efficacy and Safety Pilot Study of Amphetamine Extended-Release Oral Suspension in the Treatment of Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.
Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child | 2019 |
A randomized, double-blind, 3-way crossover, analog classroom study of SHP465 mixed amphetamine salts extended-release in adolescents with ADHD.
Topics: Adolescent; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimu | 2019 |
Single-Dose Pharmacokinetics of Amphetamine Extended-Release Oral Suspension in Healthy Adults.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Biological | 2021 |
Post-Hoc Analyses of the Effects of Baseline Sleep Quality on SHP465 Mixed Amphetamine Salts Extended-Release Treatment Response in Adults with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous Syste | 2019 |
Morning and Evening Effects of Guanfacine Extended Release Adjunctive to Psychostimulants in Pediatric ADHD.
Topics: Adolescent; Adrenergic alpha-2 Receptor Agonists; Amphetamine; Analysis of Variance; Attention Defic | 2017 |
The Efficacy and Safety of Evekeo, Racemic Amphetamine Sulfate, for Treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Symptoms: A Multicenter, Dose-Optimized, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Crossover Laboratory Classroom Study.
Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child | 2015 |
A randomized crossover study to assess the pharmacokinetics of a novel amphetamine extended-release orally disintegrating tablet in healthy adults.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Amphetamine; Area Under Curve; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperact | 2016 |
Mixed-amphetamine salts increase abstinence from marijuana in patients with co-occurring attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and cocaine dependence.
Topics: Adult; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants | 2016 |
Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder-specific quality of life with triple-bead mixed amphetamine salts (SPD465) in adults: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
Topics: Adult; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants | 2008 |
Safety and effectiveness of coadministration of guanfacine extended release and psychostimulants in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
Topics: Adolescent; Adrenergic alpha-Agonists; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; C | 2009 |
Clonidine extended-release tablets as add-on therapy to psychostimulants in children and adolescents with ADHD.
Topics: Adolescent; Adolescent Behavior; Adrenergic alpha-2 Receptor Agonists; Amphetamine; Attention Defici | 2011 |
Medication adherence and symptom reduction in adults treated with mixed amphetamine salts in a randomized crossover study.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous Syste | 2011 |
Stimulant treatment of adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
Topics: Adult; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants | 2004 |
Pharmacotherapy of adult ADHD.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Age Factors; Amphetamine; Antidepressive Agents; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Atten | 2005 |
Effect of stimulants on 24-h ambulatory blood pressure in children with ADHD: a double-blind, randomized, cross-over trial.
Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Blood Pressure; Blood Pressure Monitorin | 2006 |
Assessing medication effects in the MTA study using neuropsychological outcomes.
Topics: Amphetamine; Analysis of Variance; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous Sy | 2006 |
Assessing medication effects in the MTA study using neuropsychological outcomes.
Topics: Amphetamine; Analysis of Variance; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous Sy | 2006 |
Assessing medication effects in the MTA study using neuropsychological outcomes.
Topics: Amphetamine; Analysis of Variance; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous Sy | 2006 |
Assessing medication effects in the MTA study using neuropsychological outcomes.
Topics: Amphetamine; Analysis of Variance; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous Sy | 2006 |
Relative benefits of stimulant therapy with OROS methylphenidate versus mixed amphetamine salts extended release in improving the driving performance of adolescent drivers with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
Topics: Accidents, Traffic; Adolescent; Adult; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; A | 2006 |
Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate and mixed amphetamine salts extended-release in children with ADHD: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover analog classroom study.
Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child | 2007 |
Transition from methylphenidate or amphetamine to atomoxetine in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder--a preliminary tolerability and efficacy study.
Topics: Adolescent; Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors; Amphetamine; Analysis of Variance; Atomoxetine Hydrochlori | 2007 |
Medications do not necessarily normalize cognition in ADHD patients.
Topics: Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors; Amphetamine; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Attention Deficit Disorder wit | 2008 |
Rebound effects with long-acting amphetamine or methylphenidate stimulant medication preparations among adolescent male drivers with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Automobile Driving; C | 2008 |
Long-term, open-label safety and efficacy of atomoxetine in adults with ADHD: final report of a 4-year study.
Topics: Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors; Adult; Amphetamine; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Attention Deficit Disor | 2008 |
Computer analyzed EEG in amphetamine-responsive hyperactive children.
Topics: Adolescent; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Child; Computers; Dextroamph | 1981 |
Long-term stimulant treatment of children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder symptoms. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Topics: Abdominal Pain; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Bipolar Disorder; Centra | 1997 |
Evaluation of individual subjects in the analog classroom setting: II. Effects of dose of amphetamine (Adderall).
Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child | 1998 |
Differential effect of amphetamine optical isomers on Bender Gestalt performance of the minimally brain dysfunctioned.
Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Bender-Gestalt Test; Child; Child, Presc | 1978 |
Levoamphetamine vs dextroamphetamine in minimal brain dysfunction. Replication, time response, and differential effect by diagnostic group and family rating.
Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Child; Clin | 1976 |
Caffeine versus methylphenidate and d-amphetamine in minimal brain dysfunction: a double-blind comparison.
Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Caffeine; Child; Child, Preschool; Clini | 1975 |
A comparison of dextro-amphetamine and racemic-amphetamine in the treatment of the hyperkinetic syndrome or minimal brain dysfunction.
Topics: Adolescent; Age Factors; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Child; Child, P | 1976 |
Fenfluramine treatment of childhood attention deficit disorder with hyperactivity: a preliminary report.
Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Child; Clinical Trials as Topic; Double- | 1986 |
Levoamphetamine and dextroamphetamine: differential effect on aggression and hyperkinesis in children and dogs.
Topics: Aggression; Amphetamine; Animals; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Behavior, Animal; C | 1973 |
139 other studies available for amphetamine and ADDH
Article | Year |
---|---|
The effect of methylphenidate and mixed amphetamine salts on cognitive reflection: a field study.
Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cogni | 2022 |
First Amphetamine Transdermal Patch Approved for ADHD.
Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervo | 2022 |
Theory of visual attention (TVA) applied to rats performing the 5-choice serial reaction time task: differential effects of dopaminergic and noradrenergic manipulations.
Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Cent | 2023 |
Theory of visual attention (TVA) applied to rats performing the 5-choice serial reaction time task: differential effects of dopaminergic and noradrenergic manipulations.
Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Cent | 2023 |
Theory of visual attention (TVA) applied to rats performing the 5-choice serial reaction time task: differential effects of dopaminergic and noradrenergic manipulations.
Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Cent | 2023 |
Theory of visual attention (TVA) applied to rats performing the 5-choice serial reaction time task: differential effects of dopaminergic and noradrenergic manipulations.
Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Cent | 2023 |
Theory of visual attention (TVA) applied to rats performing the 5-choice serial reaction time task: differential effects of dopaminergic and noradrenergic manipulations.
Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Cent | 2023 |
Theory of visual attention (TVA) applied to rats performing the 5-choice serial reaction time task: differential effects of dopaminergic and noradrenergic manipulations.
Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Cent | 2023 |
Theory of visual attention (TVA) applied to rats performing the 5-choice serial reaction time task: differential effects of dopaminergic and noradrenergic manipulations.
Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Cent | 2023 |
Theory of visual attention (TVA) applied to rats performing the 5-choice serial reaction time task: differential effects of dopaminergic and noradrenergic manipulations.
Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Cent | 2023 |
Theory of visual attention (TVA) applied to rats performing the 5-choice serial reaction time task: differential effects of dopaminergic and noradrenergic manipulations.
Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Cent | 2023 |
Regional Disparities in Prescription Methamphetamine and Amphetamine Distribution Across the United States.
Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Crime | 2023 |
Switching patterns of immediate-release forms of generic mixed amphetamine salts products among privately and publicly insured individuals aged 15-64 years in the United States, 2013-2019.
Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Drugs, Generic; Humans; Medicaid; Narcol | 2023 |
Concomitant Drug Use among Opioid-Dependent Patients with and without Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: Does Methylphenidate Merit a Trial?
Topics: Amphetamine; Analgesics, Opioid; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous Syst | 2023 |
Evaluation and Management of Attention-Deficit/ Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in Children and Adolescents.
Topics: Adolescent; Amphetamine; Attention; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Child; Employment | 2023 |
Medical Cannabis Legalization: No Contribution to Rising Stimulant Rates in the USA.
Topics: Adult; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants | 2023 |
ADHD medication and the inverted U-shaped curve: A pharmacological study in female mice performing the rodent Continuous Performance Test (rCPT).
Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Cent | 2020 |
Amphetamine-Dextroamphetamine and Pregnancy: Neonatal Outcomes After Prenatal Prescription Mixed Amphetamine Exposure.
Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Dextroamphetamine; Female; Humans; Infan | 2021 |
A Sympathetic Treatment for Obesity.
Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Brain; Central Nervous System Stimulants | 2020 |
Use Motives of Patients with Amphetamine-Type Stimulants Use Disorder and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.
Topics: Adult; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants | 2020 |
Trends in stimulant dispensing by age, sex, state of residence, and prescriber specialty - United States, 2014-2019.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Ce | 2020 |
ADHD-like behaviors caused by inactivation of a transcription factor controlling the balance of inhibitory and excitatory neuron development in the mouse anterior brainstem.
Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Brain Stem; Dopaminergic Neuron | 2020 |
[Harmonized measurement and reporting of chiral amphetamine in the follow-up of ADHD treatment].
Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Follo | 2020 |
Relationship Between Amphetamine Concentrations in Saliva and Serum in Children and Adolescents With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.
Topics: Adolescent; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Child; Drug Monitoring; Fema | 2021 |
Sedation After a Trial of Mixed Amphetamine Salts in a Boy with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.
Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Autism Spectrum Disorder; Child; Humans; | 2020 |
A Longitudinal Study of Resting-State Connectivity and Response to Psychostimulant Treatment in ADHD.
Topics: Adolescent; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Brain; Case-Control Studies; | 2021 |
Adaptive aspects of impulsivity and interactions with effects of catecholaminergic agents in the 5-choice serial reaction time task: implications for ADHD.
Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Choice Behavior; Impulsive Beha | 2021 |
Mixed Amphetamine Salts Without a Mood Stabilizer for Treating Comorbid Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and Bipolar Disorder: Two Case Reports.
Topics: Amphetamine; Antipsychotic Agents; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Bipolar Disorder; | 2023 |
Transcriptional profiling of SHR/NCrl prefrontal cortex shows hyperactivity-associated genes responsive to amphetamine challenge.
Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Ataxin-7; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous Syste | 2017 |
Chiral analysis of amphetamines in hair by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry: compliance-monitoring of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) patients under Elvanse® therapy and identification after controlled low-dose application.
Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Fo | 2018 |
Mixed-amphetamine salts expectancies among college students: Is stimulant induced cognitive enhancement a placebo effect?
Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cogni | 2017 |
Effect of methylphenidate on visual responses in the superior colliculus in the anaesthetised rat: Role of cortical activation.
Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulan | 2017 |
Placental Complications Associated With Psychostimulant Use in Pregnancy.
Topics: Abruptio Placentae; Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors; Adult; Amphetamine; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Att | 2017 |
Association Between Methylphenidate and Amphetamine Use in Pregnancy and Risk of Congenital Malformations: A Cohort Study From the International Pregnancy Safety Study Consortium.
Topics: Abnormalities, Drug-Induced; Adolescent; Adult; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperac | 2018 |
Amphetamine, but not methylphenidate, increases ethanol intake in adolescent male, but not in female, rats.
Topics: Alcohol Drinking; Amphetamine; Animals; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervo | 2018 |
Pediatric ADHD Medication Exposures Reported to US Poison Control Centers.
Topics: Adolescent; Age Distribution; Amphetamine; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Attention Deficit Disorder wit | 2018 |
Chronic amphetamine enhances visual input to and suppresses visual output from the superior colliculus in withdrawal.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Amphetamine; Animals; Attention; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity | 2018 |
Resolution of Anxiety Symptoms in Response to Stimulants in a Patient With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and Generalized Anxiety Disorder.
Topics: Adult; Amphetamine; Anxiety Disorders; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervou | 2018 |
Effect of ADHD medication in male C57BL/6J mice performing the rodent Continuous Performance Test.
Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Attention; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperact | 2019 |
Psychosis with Methylphenidate or Amphetamine in Patients with ADHD.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous Syste | 2019 |
Psychosis during Attention Deficit-Hyperactivity Disorder Treatment with Stimulants.
Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Human | 2019 |
Gender Effects in the Efficacy of Racemic Amphetamine Sulfate in Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.
Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child | 2019 |
Prevalence and Consequences of the Nonmedical Use of Amphetamine Among Persons Calling Poison Control Centers.
Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Human | 2019 |
Dopamine-mediated immunomodulation affects choroid plexus function.
Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Bipolar Disorder; Central Nervo | 2019 |
Knockout of latrophilin-3 in Sprague-Dawley rats causes hyperactivity, hyper-reactivity, under-response to amphetamine, and disrupted dopamine markers.
Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulan | 2019 |
Surveillance of diversion and nonmedical use of extended-release prescription amphetamine and oral methylphenidate in the United States.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Amphetamine; Amphetamine-Related Disorders; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyper | 2013 |
Estimating the passage of minutes: deviant oscillatory frontal activity in medicated and unmedicated ADHD.
Topics: Adult; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Brain Mapping; Central Nervous Sy | 2013 |
Determination of amphetamine and methylphenidate in exhaled breath of patients undergoing attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder treatment.
Topics: Adult; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Chromatography, Liquid; Exhalatio | 2014 |
Comparing stimulant effects in youth with ADHD symptoms and epilepsy.
Topics: Adolescent; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimu | 2014 |
Drug treatment for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and suicidal behaviour: register based study.
Topics: Adolescent; Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors; Adult; Amphetamine; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Attention D | 2014 |
Medical treatment of children and youths with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): a Norwegian Prescription Registry Based Study.
Topics: Adolescent; Amphetamine; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; C | 2014 |
Treatment receipt and outcomes from a clinic employing the attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder treatment guideline of the children's medication algorithm project.
Topics: Adolescent; Algorithms; Amphetamine; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hype | 2014 |
Effectiveness of one-year pharmacological treatment of adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): an open-label prospective study of time in treatment, dose, side-effects and comorbidity.
Topics: Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors; Adult; Amphetamine; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Attention Deficit Disor | 2014 |
A case series on the heightened autonomic response due to guanfacine and amphetamine interaction.
Topics: Adrenergic alpha-Agonists; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Autonomic Ner | 2015 |
Single-quantum-dot tracking reveals altered membrane dynamics of an attention-deficit/hyperactivity-disorder-derived dopamine transporter coding variant.
Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Cell Membrane; Central Nervous System St | 2015 |
The billion dollar business of being smart.
Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Caffeine; Central Nervous System Stimula | 2015 |
Adolescent D-amphetamine treatment in a rodent model of ADHD: Pro-cognitive effects in adolescence without an impact on cocaine cue reactivity in adulthood.
Topics: Aging; Amphetamine; Animals; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System S | 2016 |
Is adjunctive pharmacotherapy in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder cost-effective in Canada: a cost-effectiveness assessment of guanfacine extended-release as an adjunctive therapy to a long-acting stimulant for the treatment of ADHD.
Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child | 2016 |
Risk of Injury According to Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, Comorbid Mental Illness, and Medication Therapy.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Amphetamine; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperacti | 2016 |
Somnambulism During Monotherapy With Mixed Amphetamine Salts.
Topics: Adolescent; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Child; Delayed-Action Prepar | 2016 |
Two new amphetamines for ADHD.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous Sy | 2016 |
Improvement of attention with amphetamine in low- and high-performing rats.
Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Attention; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous Syst | 2016 |
Use of drugs for ADHD among adults-a multinational study among 15.8 million adults in the Nordic countries.
Topics: Adolescent; Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors; Adult; Amphetamine; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Attention D | 2016 |
Adolescent d-amphetamine treatment in a rodent model of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: impact on cocaine abuse vulnerability in adulthood.
Topics: Amphetamine; Analysis of Variance; Animals; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central N | 2016 |
Effects of amphetamine and methylphenidate on attentional performance and impulsivity in the mouse 5-Choice Serial Reaction Time Task.
Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Attention; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Behavior, Animal; Ce | 2017 |
Hemodynamic profile and behavioral characteristics during induction of anesthesia in pediatric patients with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.
Topics: Adolescent; Amphetamine; Anesthesia; Anti-Anxiety Agents; Anxiety; Attention Deficit Disorder with H | 2017 |
Children's self-reports on perceived effects on taking stimulant medication for ADHD.
Topics: Achievement; Adolescent; Aggression; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Att | 2009 |
Simulated driving changes in young adults with ADHD receiving mixed amphetamine salts extended release and atomoxetine.
Topics: Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors; Adult; Amphetamine; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Attention Deficit Disor | 2009 |
Treating adult ADHD with stimulants.
Topics: Adult; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants | 2008 |
Stimulant dosing for children with ADHD: a medical claims analysis.
Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child | 2009 |
Cardiac safety of methylphenidate versus amphetamine salts in the treatment of ADHD.
Topics: Adolescent; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Blood Pressure; Central Nerv | 2009 |
Psychostimulant treatment for ADHD is modulated by prefrontal cortex manipulation.
Topics: Amphetamine; Analysis of Variance; Animals; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Catheteri | 2009 |
D2 dopamine receptor subtype-mediated hyperactivity and amphetamine responses in a model of ADHD.
Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Benzopyrans; Corpus Striatum; D | 2010 |
Outcomes after accidental pediatric ingestions of (dextro)amphetamine and methylphenidate.
Topics: Accidents; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimul | 2009 |
Central stimulants in the treatment of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children and adolescents. A naturalistic study of the prescription in Sweden, 1977-2007.
Topics: Adolescent; Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hy | 2009 |
Forebrain overexpression of CK1delta leads to down-regulation of dopamine receptors and altered locomotor activity reminiscent of ADHD.
Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Behavior, Animal; Casein Kinase | 2010 |
Pharmacological treatment patterns among patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: retrospective claims-based analysis of a managed care population.
Topics: Adolescent; Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors; Adult; Age Factors; Amphetamine; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride | 2010 |
Peripheral vasculopathy associated with psychostimulant treatment in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
Topics: Adolescent; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimu | 2010 |
Evidence for subtle verbal fluency deficits in occasional stimulant users: quick to play loose with verbal rules.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous Syste | 2011 |
Impulsiveness, overactivity, and poorer sustained attention improve by chronic treatment with low doses of l-amphetamine in an animal model of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD).
Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Attention; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Disease Models, Anim | 2011 |
GIT1 is associated with ADHD in humans and ADHD-like behaviors in mice.
Topics: Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing; Amphetamine; Animals; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperact | 2011 |
Stimulant adherence and academic performance in urban youth with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
Topics: Achievement; Adolescent; Amphetamine; Anxiety Disorders; Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior D | 2011 |
Methylphenidate and fluphenazine, but not amphetamine, differentially affect impulsive choice in spontaneously hypertensive, Wistar-Kyoto and Sprague-Dawley rats.
Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulan | 2011 |
Role for the membrane receptor guanylyl cyclase-C in attention deficiency and hyperactive behavior.
Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Attention; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Behavior, Animal; Cy | 2011 |
ADHD medication use, adherence, persistence and cost among Texas Medicaid children.
Topics: Adolescent; Amphetamine; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; C | 2011 |
Broadband neurophysiological abnormalities in the medial prefrontal region of the default-mode network in adults with ADHD.
Topics: Adult; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Brain Mapping; Brain Waves; Case- | 2013 |
Brain region differences in regulation of Akt and GSK3 by chronic stimulant administration in mice.
Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Arrestins; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; beta-Arrestins; Brai | 2012 |
Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder-derived coding variation in the dopamine transporter disrupts microdomain targeting and trafficking regulation.
Topics: Adolescent; Amphetamine; Analysis of Variance; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Bacter | 2012 |
Astrocyte-specific disruption of SynCAM1 signaling results in ADHD-like behavioral manifestations.
Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Anxiety; Astrocytes; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Behavior, | 2012 |
The early history of the neuroscience of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child | 2012 |
A population-based study of stimulant drug treatment of ADHD and academic progress in children.
Topics: Achievement; Age Factors; Amphetamine; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hy | 2012 |
Possible association with amphetamine usage and development of high altitude pulmonary edema.
Topics: Altitude Sickness; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Dextroamphetamine; Hu | 2012 |
Amphetamine-induced locomotion in a hyperdopaminergic ADHD mouse model depends on genetic background.
Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Disease Models, Animal; Dopamin | 2013 |
Hippocampal deep brain stimulation reverses physiological and behavioural deficits in a rodent model of schizophrenia.
Topics: Action Potentials; Amphetamine; Animals; Animals, Newborn; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperacti | 2013 |
Effects of atomoxetine on locomotor activity and impulsivity in the spontaneously hypertensive rat.
Topics: Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors; Amphetamine; Animals; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Attention Deficit Dis | 2013 |
[Apropos the National Board and Welfare's report on ADDH: some views on the treatment with central nervous system stimulants].
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Brain; Central Nervou | 2002 |
Phencyclidine exacerbates attentional deficits in a neurodevelopmental rat model of schizophrenia.
Topics: Aging; Amphetamine; Animals; Animals, Newborn; Attention; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactiv | 2003 |
A COMPARISON OF CHLORDIAZEPOXIDE, D-AMPHETAMINE, AND PLACEBO IN THE TREATMENT OF THE HYPERKINETIC SYNDROME IN CHILDREN.
Topics: Amphetamine; Amphetamines; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Child; Chlordiazepoxide; D | 1963 |
Can a therapeutic dose of amphetamine during pre-adolescence modify the pattern of synaptic organization in the brain?
Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Brain; Calcium-Calmodulin-Depen | 2003 |
The dopamine D4 receptor is essential for hyperactivity and impaired behavioral inhibition in a mouse model of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Animals, Outbred Strains; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Behav | 2004 |
[Altered behavioral response to centrally acting drugs in mice lacking PACAP].
Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Behavior, Animal; Disease Model | 2003 |
Psychostimulant treatment of adults with mental retardation and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.
Topics: Adult; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants | 2004 |
Treating adolescent girls and women with ADHD: gender-specific issues.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Age Factors; Amphetamine; Anxiety Disorders; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hype | 2005 |
Long-term effects of extended-release mixed amphetamine salts treatment of attention- deficit/hyperactivity disorder on growth.
Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Body Height; Body Mass Index; Body Weigh | 2005 |
Amphetamine treatment similar to that used in the treatment of adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder damages dopaminergic nerve endings in the striatum of adult nonhuman primates.
Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Corpus Striatum; Dose-Response | 2005 |
Sensitization to amphetamine, but not PCP, impairs attentional set shifting: reversal by a D1 receptor agonist injected into the medial prefrontal cortex.
Topics: 2,3,4,5-Tetrahydro-7,8-dihydroxy-1-phenyl-1H-3-benzazepine; Amphetamine; Analysis of Variance; Anima | 2005 |
Algorithmically designed peptides ameliorate behavioral defects in animal model of ADHD by an allosteric mechanism.
Topics: Acoustic Stimulation; Algorithms; Allosteric Site; Amphetamine; Animals; Attention Deficit Disorder | 2006 |
Visual function and ocular features in children and adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, with and without treatment with stimulants.
Topics: Adolescent; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimu | 2007 |
The latest drugs on the FDA's radar.
Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Contr | 2006 |
Cardiovascular effects of mixed amphetamine salts extended release in the treatment of school-aged children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
Topics: Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Blood Pres | 2007 |
[Medication for ADHD and the risk of cardiovascular mortality].
Topics: Amphetamine; Arrhythmias, Cardiac; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Cardiovascular Dis | 2006 |
[Medication for ADHD and the risk of cardiovascular mortality].
Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Death | 2006 |
D2-like dopamine receptors mediate the response to amphetamine in a mouse model of ADHD.
Topics: Adenylyl Cyclases; Amphetamine; Animals; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Catalepsy; C | 2007 |
Amphetamine and mCPP effects on dopamine and serotonin striatal in vivo microdialysates in an animal model of hyperactivity.
Topics: 3,4-Dihydroxyphenylacetic Acid; 5,6-Dihydroxytryptamine; Age Factors; Amphetamine; Animals; Attentio | 2007 |
[Prescribing of stimulants for ADHD in Nordland County].
Topics: Adolescent; Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors; Adult; Amphetamine; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Attention D | 2007 |
Interactions of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder therapeutic agents with the efflux transporter P-glycoprotein.
Topics: Adenosine Triphosphate; Amphetamine; Animals; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; ATP Binding Cassette Transp | 2008 |
Treatment of ADHD with amphetamine: short-term effects on family interaction.
Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child | 2008 |
School-based administration of ADHD drugs decline, along with diversion, theft, and misuse.
Topics: Amphetamine; Amphetamine-Related Disorders; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Attitude | 2007 |
Arousal, temporal and spatial uncertainty and drug effects.
Topics: Adult; Alcohol Drinking; Amphetamine; Antipsychotic Agents; Arousal; Attention; Attention Deficit Di | 1983 |
[Amphetamine in the therapy of hyperactivity in children].
Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Child; Humans | 1982 |
Origin of stimulant use for treatment of attention deficit disorder.
Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; History, 20th Century; Humans | 1995 |
[Treatment of hyperactivity and attention deficit with amphetamine. Experience with five adult prisoners].
Topics: Adult; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Humans; Male; Norway; Prisoners | 1996 |
["The amphetamine treatment helped my child". Is it time to reevaluate Swedish practice in hyperactivity syndrome?].
Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child | 1996 |
Selegiline for the delivery of small doses of amphetamine.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Child; Child Developm | 1997 |
The variable number of tandem repeats polymorphism of the dopamine transporter gene is not associated with significant change in dopamine transporter phenotype in humans.
Topics: Adult; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Benzamides; Carrier Proteins; Coc | 2001 |
[Lack of respect for pediatric neuropsychiatry as a field of knowledge].
Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child | 2001 |
[Drug treatment of school children with attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder].
Topics: Adolescent; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimu | 2001 |
Does extended medication with amphetamine or methylphenidate reduce growth in hyperactive children?
Topics: Adolescent; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Body Height; Body Weight; Ce | 2002 |
Possible role of 5-hydroxyptamine in minimal brain dysfunction.
Topics: Amphetamine; Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena; Animals; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hy | 1975 |
Selective brain dopamine depletion in developing rats: an experimental model of minimal brain dysfunction.
Topics: Age Factors; Amphetamine; Animals; Animals, Newborn; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; | 1976 |
[Drug therapy of minimal brain dysfunction syndrome (clinical study using Captagon)].
Topics: Amphetamine; Amphetamines; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Child; Child, Preschool; D | 1975 |
Ten years of experience with 1,000 hyperactive children in a private practice.
Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Behavior Therapy; Body Height; Body Weig | 1985 |
The natural life history of children with minimal brain dysfunction.
Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Cerebral Palsy; Child; Child Behavior Di | 1973 |
Drugs in management of minimal brain dysfunction.
Topics: Amphetamine; Anticonvulsants; Antidepressive Agents; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; | 1973 |
Letter: Stimulant drugs for problem children.
Topics: Adult; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Child; Child Behavior Disorders; | 1973 |
The minimal brain dysfunction syndrome in children. I. The syndrome and its relevance for psychiatry. II. A psychological and biochemical model for the syndrome.
Topics: Affect; Amphetamine; Arousal; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Autonomic Nervous Syste | 1972 |
Postnatal lead acetate exposure in rats: possible relationship to minimal brain dysfunction.
Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Animals, Newborn; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Disease Model | 1974 |
Drugs for the hyperactive child.
Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Child Behavior Disorders; Humans; Motor | 1972 |
Gilles de la Tourette's disease and minimal brain dysfunction: amphetamine isomers reveal catecholamine correlates in an affected patient.
Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Brain; Child; Dextroamphetamine; Dopamin | 1973 |
Hyperactivity in children.
Topics: Amphetamine; Anticonvulsants; Antidepressive Agents; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; | 1973 |
The hyperactive child syndrome.
Topics: Age Factors; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Child Behavior Disorders; C | 1973 |
The hyperactive child.
Topics: Age Factors; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Child; Child, Preschool; Di | 1973 |
[The minimal brain dysfunction syndrome].
Topics: Affective Symptoms; Amphetamine; Anticonvulsants; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Chi | 1973 |
[Amphetamines in the treatment of hyperactive and instable children].
Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Child; Female; Humans; Hyperkinesis; Mal | 1973 |
Average evoked responses in normal and minimally brain dysfunctioned children treated with amphetamine.
Topics: Acoustic Stimulation; Age Factors; Amphetamine; Attention; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperacti | 1973 |
Minimal brain dysfunctions in children.
Topics: Amphetamine; Attention; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Child; Child, Preschool; Comm | 1974 |
Hyperactivity in children: types, diagosis, drug therapy, approaches to management.
Topics: Amphetamine; Anxiety; Attention; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Brain Damage, Chroni | 1972 |