Page last updated: 2024-10-25

amphetamine and ADDH

amphetamine has been researched along with ADDH in 240 studies

Amphetamine: A powerful central nervous system stimulant and sympathomimetic. Amphetamine has multiple mechanisms of action including blocking uptake of adrenergics and dopamine, stimulation of release of monamines, and inhibiting monoamine oxidase. Amphetamine is also a drug of abuse and a psychotomimetic. The l- and the d,l-forms are included here. The l-form has less central nervous system activity but stronger cardiovascular effects. The d-form is DEXTROAMPHETAMINE.
1-phenylpropan-2-amine : A primary amine that is isopropylamine in which a hydrogen attached to one of the methyl groups has been replaced by a phenyl group.
amphetamine : A racemate comprising equimolar amounts of (R)-amphetamine (also known as levamphetamine or levoamphetamine) and (S)-amphetamine (also known as dexamfetamine or dextroamphetamine.

Research Excerpts

ExcerptRelevanceReference
"Three aspects of cocaine abuse vulnerability were assessed in adulthood after discontinuing adolescent treatments: acquisition rate and dose-related responding under fixed (FR) and progressive (PR) ratio schedules."5.43Adolescent d-amphetamine treatment in a rodent model of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: impact on cocaine abuse vulnerability in adulthood. ( Dwoskin, LP; Jordan, CJ; Kantak, KM; Lemay, C, 2016)
"Schizophrenia is characterized by severe abnormalities in cognition, including disordered attention."5.32Phencyclidine exacerbates attentional deficits in a neurodevelopmental rat model of schizophrenia. ( Grottick, AJ; Higgins, GA; Le Pen, G; Moreau, JL, 2003)
" Women who received amphetamine-dextroamphetamine or methylphenidate monotherapy in the first half of pregnancy were compared with unexposed women."3.85Placental Complications Associated With Psychostimulant Use in Pregnancy. ( Bateman, BT; Cohen, JM; Desai, RJ; Gray, KJ; Hernández-Díaz, S; Huybrechts, KF; Mogun, H; Park, Y; Patorno, E, 2017)
" The primary objective of the current study was to assess differences in blood pressure and heart rate before and after induction of anesthesia between patients on chronic amphetamine or methylphenidate therapy who receive their normal dose preoperatively compared to patients in whom the prescribed medication was withheld."3.85Hemodynamic profile and behavioral characteristics during induction of anesthesia in pediatric patients with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. ( Cartabuke, RS; Rice, J; Tobias, JD; Tumin, D, 2017)
"Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is comorbid with cocaine abuse."3.83Adolescent D-amphetamine treatment in a rodent model of ADHD: Pro-cognitive effects in adolescence without an impact on cocaine cue reactivity in adulthood. ( Dwoskin, LP; Jordan, CJ; Kantak, KM; Taylor, DM, 2016)
"To retrospectively examine response to stimulant treatment in patients with epilepsy and ADHD symptoms as predicted by seizure freedom for six months, use of methylphenidate (MPH) versus amphetamine (AMP) preparations, cognitive level, and medical records were searched for patients under the age of 18 with epilepsy and ADHD symptoms treated with MPH or AMP (n=36, age=10."3.80Comparing stimulant effects in youth with ADHD symptoms and epilepsy. ( Azeem, MW; Biederman, J; Bourgeois, B; Gonzalez-Heydrich, J; Gumlak, S; Hickory, M; Hsin, O; Kimball, K; Mezzacappa, E; Mrakotsky, C; Rober, A; Torres, A, 2014)
" GFAP-DNSynCAM1 mice also display high levels of basal activity in the dark period (the rodent's awake/active time) that are attenuated by the psychostimulant D,L-amphetamine, and reduced anxiety levels in response to both avoidable and unavoidable provoking stimuli."3.78Astrocyte-specific disruption of SynCAM1 signaling results in ADHD-like behavioral manifestations. ( Alderman, Z; Corfas, G; Ojeda, SR; Raber, J; Sandau, US, 2012)
" Here we dissect the components of dopaminergic neurotransmission in the hyperactive mouse mutant coloboma to identify pre- and postsynaptic elements essential for the effects of amphetamine in these mice."3.74D2-like dopamine receptors mediate the response to amphetamine in a mouse model of ADHD. ( Fan, X; Hess, EJ, 2007)
"25 mg, the pharmacokinetic profile of plasma d-amphetamine and l-amphetamine was generally consistent among participants."3.11Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of SHP465 Mixed Amphetamine Salts After Administration of Multiple Daily Doses in Children Aged 4-5 Years with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. ( Ilic, K; Kugler, AR; McNamara, N; Yan, B, 2022)
" It is important that future research addresses the current weaknesses in this area, which include small sample sizes, variability of selection criteria, variability of the type and dosage of supplementation, and short follow-up times."3.01Polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children and adolescents. ( Gillies, D; Leach, MJ; Perez Algorta, G, 2023)
" Safety assessments included vital signs and adverse events (AEs)."2.90Early-Onset Efficacy and Safety Pilot Study of Amphetamine Extended-Release Oral Suspension in the Treatment of Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. ( Childress, AC; Herman, BK; Kando, JC; King, TR; Pardo, A, 2019)
" Safety was assessed measuring adverse events (AEs) and vital signs."2.87Efficacy and Safety of Amphetamine Extended-Release Oral Suspension in Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. ( Belden, HW; Berry, SA; Brams, MN; Childress, AC; Pincus, Y; Turnbow, JM; Wigal, SB, 2018)
" Treatment-emergent adverse events reported (>5%) with SHP465 MAS were decreased appetite, dry mouth, insomnia, headache, anxiety, initial insomnia, irritability, and bruxism."2.84Efficacy and Safety of SHP465 Mixed Amphetamine Salts in the Treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Adults: Results of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Forced-Dose Clinical Study. ( Arnold, V; Greenbaum, M; Jaffee, M; Robertson, B; Weisler, RH; Yan, B; Yu, M, 2017)
" The pharmacokinetic profiles of d- and l-AMP were comparable across treatment groups."2.84A Randomized Phase I Study to Assess the Effect of Alcohol on the Pharmacokinetics of an Extended-release Orally Disintegrating Tablet Formulation of Amphetamine in Healthy Adults. ( Adcock, S; McMahen, R; Newcorn, JH; Sikes, C; Stark, JG, 2017)
" When AMP XR-ODT was administered with food, there was a slight decrease in the d-and l-amphetamine Cmax and approximately a 2-hour delay in Tmax."2.82A randomized crossover study to assess the pharmacokinetics of a novel amphetamine extended-release orally disintegrating tablet in healthy adults. ( Engelking, D; McMahen, R; Sikes, C; Stark, JG, 2016)
" Safety assessments included physical examination, chemistry, hematology, vital signs, and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs)."2.80The Efficacy and Safety of Evekeo, Racemic Amphetamine Sulfate, for Treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Symptoms: A Multicenter, Dose-Optimized, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Crossover Laboratory Classroom Study. ( Brams, M; Childress, AC; Cutler, AJ; Kollins, SH; Northcutt, J; Padilla, A; Turnbow, JM, 2015)
"Safety assessments included adverse events (AEs), vital signs, physical examination, clinical laboratory tests, the Pediatric Daytime Sleepiness Scale, and the Pittsburgh Side Effects Rating Scale."2.74Safety and effectiveness of coadministration of guanfacine extended release and psychostimulants in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. ( Ginsberg, LD; Greenbaum, M; Murphy, WR; Spencer, TJ, 2009)
"Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate is a therapeutically inactive prodrug in which d-amphetamine is covalently bound to l-lysine, a naturally occurring amino acid."2.73Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate and mixed amphetamine salts extended-release in children with ADHD: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover analog classroom study. ( Biederman, J; Boellner, SW; Childress, A; Krishnan, S; Lopez, FA; Zhang, Y, 2007)
" Adverse events consisted primarily of pharmacologically (noradrenergic) expected effects."2.73Long-term, open-label safety and efficacy of atomoxetine in adults with ADHD: final report of a 4-year study. ( Adler, LA; Michelson, D; Moore, RJ; Spencer, TJ; Williams, DW, 2008)
"Amphetamine was clearly superior to placebo in reducing inattention, hyperactivity, and other disruptive behavior problems and tended to lead to improved results on the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children--Revised."2.68Long-term stimulant treatment of children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder symptoms. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. ( Eidevall-Wallin, L; Gillberg, C; Gustafsson, P; Hägglöf, B; Janols, LO; Kopp, S; Melander, H; Thernlund, G; von Knorring, AL, 1997)
"Methylphenidate derivatives were associated with a significantly decreased risk of irritability compared to placebo (risk ratio [RR] = 0."2.55Risk of Irritability With Psychostimulant Treatment in Children With ADHD: A Meta-Analysis. ( Bloch, MH; Cohen, SC; Coughlin, CG; Ferracioli-Oda, E; Leckman, JF; Mulqueen, JM; Stuckelman, ZD, 2017)
"Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) is a long-acting d-amphetamine prodrug used to treat attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children, adolescents and adults."2.53Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate: Prodrug Delivery, Amphetamine Exposure and Duration of Efficacy. ( Ermer, JC; Frick, G; Pennick, M, 2016)
" Deviations from suggested routes of administration such as crushing, chewing, intravenous administration, or snorting stimulant medication may alter the release rate, absorption, and bioavailability of the active drug."2.53Safety and efficacy considerations due to misuse of extended-release formulations of stimulant medications. ( Jain, R; Stark, JG, 2016)
"Clinical practice currently restricts the use of psychostimulant medications in children with tics or a family history of tics for fear that tics will develop or worsen as a side effect of treatment."2.52Meta-Analysis: Risk of Tics Associated With Psychostimulant Use in Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trials. ( Bloch, MH; Cohen, SC; Coughlin, CG; Ferracioli-Oda, E; Leckman, JF; Mulqueen, JM; Stuckelman, ZD, 2015)
"Amphetamine was discovered over 100 years ago."2.49Amphetamine, past and present--a pharmacological and clinical perspective. ( Gosden, J; Heal, DJ; Nutt, DJ; Smith, SL, 2013)
" In seeking to optimize individual response and outcomes to stimulant therapy, important considerations include the selection of stimulant class, the choice of long- or short-acting stimulant formulations, addressing effectively any emergent adverse effects and strategies aimed at enhancing adherence to dosing regimen and persistence on therapy."2.48Amfetamine and methylphenidate medications for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: complementary treatment options. ( Coghill, D; Hechtman, L; Hodgkins, P; Shaw, M, 2012)
" Unfortunately, results of current ADHD pharmacogenetic studies have not been entirely consistent, possibly due to differences in study design, medication dosing regimens and outcome measures."2.46Progress and promise of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder pharmacogenetics. ( Froehlich, TE; McGough, JJ; Stein, MA, 2010)
" They are generally safe in special populations."2.45Safety of stimulant treatment in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: Part I. ( Kuchibhatla, A; Merkel, RL, 2009)
"d-Amphetamine has a mechanism independent of neuronal firing rate, displacing intraneuronal stores of catecholamines, delaying their reuptake and inhibiting catabolism by monoamine oxidase."2.45The neuropharmacology of ADHD drugs in vivo: insights on efficacy and safety. ( Cheetham, SC; Heal, DJ; Smith, SL, 2009)
" Overall, there is concern about risk for slowed growth in young patients who are dosed continuously, and for substance abuse in patients first medicated in late adolescence or adulthood."2.45Potential adverse effects of amphetamine treatment on brain and behavior: a review. ( Berman, SM; Kuczenski, R; London, ED; McCracken, JT, 2009)
"Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in persons over 3 years of age and narcolepsy; methamphetamine is approved for the treatment of ADHD in persons 6 years of age and older and for short-term treatment of obesity."2.43NTP-CERHR monograph on the potential human reproductive and developmental effects of amphetamines. ( , 2005)
"Amphetamine salts have been helpful in treating bipolar children with comorbid ADHD, but no data are available on treating comorbid depression in bipolar children."2.43Recognizing and managing bipolar disorder in children. ( Wozniak, J, 2005)
"Amphetamine (AMPH), mainly used in the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and narcolepsy, has weight loss properties, although with detrimental cardiovascular effects."1.56A Sympathetic Treatment for Obesity. ( Diano, S; Kim, JD, 2020)
"Amphetamine is an illicit central nervous system stimulant that is also used for the treatment of attention-decific/hyperacticity disorder (ADHD)."1.56[Harmonized measurement and reporting of chiral amphetamine in the follow-up of ADHD treatment]. ( Helander, A; Villen, T; Widing, E, 2020)
"Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder is a pervasive developmental disorder characterized by inattention, impulsivity, and hyperactivity and is 75-90% heritable."1.51Knockout of latrophilin-3 in Sprague-Dawley rats causes hyperactivity, hyper-reactivity, under-response to amphetamine, and disrupted dopamine markers. ( Hu, YC; Hufgard, JR; Pitzer, EM; Regan, SL; Sugimoto, C; Vorhees, CV; Williams, MT, 2019)
"Amphetamine use was associated with a greater risk of psychosis than methylphenidate."1.51Psychosis with Methylphenidate or Amphetamine in Patients with ADHD. ( Castro, VM; Hsu, J; Moran, LV; Ongur, D; Perlis, RH; Schneeweiss, S, 2019)
"Methylphenidate was also found to produce activation of the cortical EEG in anaesthetised rats."1.46Effect of methylphenidate on visual responses in the superior colliculus in the anaesthetised rat: Role of cortical activation. ( Dommett, EJ; Haensel, JX; Hetherington, L; Overton, PG; Riley, TB; Turner, AC, 2017)
"Three aspects of cocaine abuse vulnerability were assessed in adulthood after discontinuing adolescent treatments: acquisition rate and dose-related responding under fixed (FR) and progressive (PR) ratio schedules."1.43Adolescent d-amphetamine treatment in a rodent model of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: impact on cocaine abuse vulnerability in adulthood. ( Dwoskin, LP; Jordan, CJ; Kantak, KM; Lemay, C, 2016)
"Methylphenidate was used by 88 % of drug users."1.43Use of drugs for ADHD among adults-a multinational study among 15.8 million adults in the Nordic countries. ( Bahmanyar, S; Furu, K; Karlstad, Ø; Kieler, H; Martikainen, JE; Pottegård, A; Zoëga, H, 2016)
" Patterns of medication selection and dosing were compared with CMAP guidelines."1.40Treatment receipt and outcomes from a clinic employing the attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder treatment guideline of the children's medication algorithm project. ( McLennan, JD; Vallerand, IA; Wagner, DJ, 2014)
" The dose-response curves were, however, different for the different behaviors."1.37Impulsiveness, overactivity, and poorer sustained attention improve by chronic treatment with low doses of l-amphetamine in an animal model of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). ( Sagvolden, T, 2011)
"To develop a descriptive profile of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) pharmacological treatment patterns in terms of persistence, adherence, augmentation, switching, and dosing changes; and to assess differences in treatment patterns with regard to ADHD medication type, class, and duration of action."1.36Pharmacological treatment patterns among patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: retrospective claims-based analysis of a managed care population. ( Christensen, L; Harley, C; Hodgkins, P; Sasané, R; Tetali, S, 2010)
"Among children with ADHD who continue stimulants through the first 3 months of treatment, dosing in the community treatment of ADHD tends to be lower than doses used in clinical trials."1.35Stimulant dosing for children with ADHD: a medical claims analysis. ( Marcus, S; Olfson, M; Wan, G, 2009)
"Safety concerns about central nervous system stimulants for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) include adverse cardiac effects."1.35Cardiac safety of methylphenidate versus amphetamine salts in the treatment of ADHD. ( Gerhard, T; Saidi, A; Shuster, J; Winterstein, AG, 2009)
"Schizophrenia is characterized by severe abnormalities in cognition, including disordered attention."1.32Phencyclidine exacerbates attentional deficits in a neurodevelopmental rat model of schizophrenia. ( Grottick, AJ; Higgins, GA; Le Pen, G; Moreau, JL, 2003)

Research

Studies (240)

TimeframeStudies, this research(%)All Research%
pre-199041 (17.08)18.7374
1990's8 (3.33)18.2507
2000's64 (26.67)29.6817
2010's94 (39.17)24.3611
2020's33 (13.75)2.80

Authors

AuthorsStudies
Yechiam, E1
Zeif, D1
Ilic, K1
Kugler, AR1
Yan, B5
McNamara, N1
Larkin, HD1
Cutler, AJ3
Childress, AC6
Pardo, A4
Duhoux, S1
Gomeni, R1
Rafla, E2
King, TR4
Kando, JC4
Hervig, ME4
Toschi, C4
Petersen, A3
Vangkilde, S3
Gether, U4
Robbins, TW4
Konofal, E1
Lecendreux, M1
Bizot, JC1
Lormier, AT1
Figadère, B1
Surman, CBH2
Walsh, DM1
Gillies, D1
Leach, MJ1
Perez Algorta, G1
Lopera, SD1
O'Kane, VM1
Goldhirsh, JL2
Piper, BJ2
Perez-Vilar, S1
Kempner, ME1
Dutcher, SK1
Menzin, TJ1
Woods, C1
Leishear, K1
Osterhout, J1
Adimadhyam, S1
Adereti, M1
Carruth, A1
Hansbury, A1
Sandhu, SK1
Lyons, JG1
Tschudi, L1
Fischer, SKM1
Perlov, E1
Baumgartner, MR2
Soyka, M1
Müller, TJ1
Seifritz, E1
Mutschler, J1
Van Gerpen, S1
Soundy, T1
Vik, T2
Brodersen, B1
Alexander, GD1
Cavanah, LR1
Huey, LY1
Caballero-Puntiverio, M3
Lerdrup, LS2
Arvastson, L1
Aznar, S1
Andreasen, JT3
Rose, SJ1
Hathcock, MA1
White, WM1
Borowski, K1
Rivera-Chiauzzi, EY1
Kim, JD1
Diano, S1
Thurn, D1
Riedner, A1
Wolstein, J1
Board, AR1
Guy, G1
Jones, CM1
Hoots, B1
Elliott, J1
Johnston, A1
Husereau, D1
Kelly, SE1
Eagles, C1
Charach, A1
Hsieh, SC1
Bai, Z1
Hossain, A1
Skidmore, B1
Tsakonas, E1
Chojecki, D1
Mamdani, M1
Wells, GA1
Morello, F1
Voikar, V1
Parkkinen, P1
Panhelainen, A1
Rosenholm, M1
Makkonen, A1
Rantamäki, T1
Piepponen, P1
Aitta-Aho, T1
Partanen, J1
Helander, A1
Villen, T1
Widing, E1
Wohkittel, C1
Högger, P1
Fekete, S1
Romanos, M1
Gerlach, M2
Brown, TE1
Chen, J2
Robertson, B4
Al Awami, R1
Albanna, A1
Morelli, M1
Tognotti, E1
Norman, LJ1
Sudre, G1
Bouyssi-Kobar, M1
Sharp, W1
Shaw, P1
Moazen, P1
Parker, MG1
Dalley, JW1
Armstrong, C1
Kapolowicz, MR1
Chierrito de Oliveira, D1
Guerrero de Sousa, P1
Borges Dos Reis, C1
Tonin, FS1
Maria Steimbach, L1
Virtuoso, S1
Fernandez-Llimos, F1
Pontarolo, R1
Cristina Conegero Sanches, A1
Adler, LA5
Frick, G4
Dela Peña, IJI1
Dela Peña, I1
de la Peña, JB1
Kim, HJ1
Sohn, A1
Shin, CY1
Han, DH1
Kim, BN2
Ryu, JH1
Cheong, JH1
Binz, TM1
Williner, E1
Strajhar, P1
Dolder, PC1
Liechti, ME1
Kraemer, T1
Steuer, AE1
Stuckelman, ZD2
Mulqueen, JM2
Ferracioli-Oda, E2
Cohen, SC2
Coughlin, CG2
Leckman, JF2
Bloch, MH2
Cropsey, KL1
Schiavon, S1
Hendricks, PS1
Froelich, M1
Lentowicz, I1
Fargason, R1
Weisler, RH2
Greenbaum, M2
Arnold, V1
Yu, M1
Jaffee, M1
Newcorn, JH3
Stark, JG4
Adcock, S1
McMahen, R3
Sikes, C3
Hetherington, L1
Dommett, EJ3
Turner, AC2
Riley, TB1
Haensel, JX1
Overton, PG2
Cohen, JM1
Hernández-Díaz, S3
Bateman, BT2
Park, Y1
Desai, RJ1
Gray, KJ1
Patorno, E1
Mogun, H2
Huybrechts, KF3
Engelking, D2
Wigal, SB3
Brams, MN1
Turnbow, JM2
Pincus, Y1
Belden, HW1
Berry, SA1
Bröms, G1
Christensen, LB1
Einarsdóttir, K1
Engeland, A1
Furu, K3
Gissler, M1
Karlsson, P1
Karlstad, Ø2
Kieler, H2
Lahesmaa-Korpinen, AM1
Nørgaard, M1
Reutfors, J1
Sørensen, HT1
Zoega, H3
Faraone, SV8
Ruiz, P1
Calliari, A1
Genovese, P1
Scorza, C1
Pautassi, RM1
King, SA1
Casavant, MJ1
Spiller, HA1
Hodges, NL1
Chounthirath, T1
Smith, GA1
Kraev, I1
Stewart, MG1
Stramek, A1
Suhaiban, H1
Javanbakht, A1
Stuhec, M1
Lukić, P1
Locatelli, I1
Herman, BK2
Grupe, M1
Larsen, CW1
Dietz, AG1
Wigal, S1
Lopez, F1
Madhoo, M1
Moran, LV1
Ongur, D1
Hsu, J1
Castro, VM1
Perlis, RH1
Schneeweiss, S1
Cortese, S2
Bouhajib, M1
Steingard, R1
Taskiran, S1
Connor, DF1
Markowitz, JS2
Stein, MA3
Hess, J1
Wilens, T2
Castellani, G1
Contarini, G1
Mereu, M1
Albanesi, E1
Devroye, C1
D'Amore, C1
Ferretti, V1
De Martin, S1
Papaleo, F1
Regan, SL1
Hufgard, JR1
Pitzer, EM1
Sugimoto, C1
Hu, YC1
Williams, MT1
Vorhees, CV1
Sembower, MA1
Ertischek, MD1
Buchholtz, C1
Dasgupta, N1
Schnoll, SH1
Heal, DJ3
Smith, SL3
Gosden, J1
Nutt, DJ1
Grünblatt, E1
Lange, KW1
Wilson, TW2
Heinrichs-Graham, E2
White, ML2
Knott, NL2
Wetzel, MW2
Wilens, TE2
McBurnett, K1
Turnbow, J1
Rugino, T1
White, C1
Youcha, S1
Spencer, TJ6
Brown, A1
Seidman, LJ1
Valera, EM1
Makris, N1
Lomedico, A1
Biederman, J7
Mergy, MA2
Gowrishankar, R1
Davis, GL1
Jessen, TN1
Wright, J1
Stanwood, GD1
Hahn, MK1
Blakely, RD3
Beck, O1
Stephanson, N1
Sandqvist, S1
Franck, J1
Gonzalez-Heydrich, J1
Hsin, O1
Gumlak, S1
Kimball, K1
Rober, A1
Azeem, MW1
Hickory, M1
Mrakotsky, C1
Torres, A1
Mezzacappa, E1
Bourgeois, B1
Chen, Q1
Sjölander, A1
Runeson, B1
D'Onofrio, BM1
Lichtenstein, P1
Larsson, H1
Norum, J1
Olsen, AI1
Nohr, FI1
Heyd, A1
Totth, A1
Wagner, DJ1
Vallerand, IA1
McLennan, JD1
Fredriksen, M2
Dahl, AA1
Martinsen, EW1
Klungsøyr, O1
Haavik, J2
Peleikis, DE1
Gaiser, EC1
Matuskey, D1
Perkins, E1
D'Amico, C1
Abdelghany, O1
McKee, SA1
Cosgrove, KP1
Brams, M2
Kollins, SH4
Northcutt, J1
Padilla, A1
Kovtun, O1
Sakrikar, D2
Tomlinson, ID1
Chang, JC1
Arzeta-Ferrer, X1
Rosenthal, SJ1
Chinthapalli, K1
Jordan, CJ2
Taylor, DM1
Dwoskin, LP2
Kantak, KM2
Lachaine, J1
Sikirica, V1
Mathurin, K1
Merrill, RM1
Thygerson, SM1
Palmer, CA1
Pinnaka, S1
Gosai, K1
Czekierdowski, C1
Siller, PP1
Lapidus, KA1
Ermer, JC1
Pennick, M1
Punja, S2
Schmid, CH2
Hartling, L2
Urichuk, L2
Nikles, CJ2
Vohra, S2
Xu, D1
Jain, R2
Turner, KM1
Burne, TH1
Bahmanyar, S1
Martikainen, JE1
Pottegård, A1
Lemay, C1
Notzon, DP1
Mariani, JJ1
Pavlicova, M1
Glass, A1
Mahony, AL1
Brooks, DJ1
Grabowski, J1
Levin, FR1
Fitzpatrick, CM1
Woldbye, DP1
Cartabuke, RS1
Tobias, JD1
Rice, J1
Tumin, D1
Morley, CP1
Thorell, LB1
Dahlström, K2
Berman, SM1
Kuczenski, R1
McCracken, JT1
London, ED1
Kay, GG1
Michaels, MA2
Pakull, B1
Landgraf, JM1
Anderson, CS1
Youcha, SH1
Patrick, KS1
Straughn, AB1
Perkins, JS1
González, MA1
Thomson, A1
Maltezos, S1
Paliokosta, E1
Xenitidis, K1
Olfson, M1
Marcus, S1
Wan, G1
Dopheide, JA1
Pliszka, SR1
Winterstein, AG1
Gerhard, T1
Shuster, J1
Saidi, A1
Tang, A1
Wanchoo, SJ1
Swann, AC1
Dafny, N1
Cheetham, SC1
Merkel, RL3
Kuchibhatla, A1
Fan, X2
Xu, M1
Hess, EJ2
LoVecchio, F1
Ozimek, J1
Sawyers, B1
Thole, D1
Ginsberg, LD1
Murphy, WR1
Sitte, HH1
Freissmuth, M1
Janols, LO2
Liliemark, J1
Klintberg, K1
von Knorring, AL2
Froehlich, TE1
McGough, JJ1
Zhou, M1
Rebholz, H1
Brocia, C1
Warner-Schmidt, JL1
Fienberg, AA1
Nairn, AC1
Greengard, P1
Flajolet, M1
Christensen, L1
Sasané, R1
Hodgkins, P2
Harley, C1
Tetali, S1
Advokat, C3
Yu, ZJ1
Parker-Kotler, C1
Tran, K1
Weller, RA1
Weller, EB1
Reske, M1
Delis, DC1
Paulus, MP1
Swanson, J1
Baler, RD1
Volkow, ND1
Sagvolden, T1
Won, H1
Mah, W1
Kim, E2
Kim, JW1
Hahm, EK1
Kim, MH1
Cho, S1
Kim, J1
Jang, H1
Cho, SC1
Shin, MS1
Seo, J1
Jeong, J1
Choi, SY1
Kim, D1
Kang, C1
Marcus, SC1
Durkin, M1
Segal, S1
Findling, RL1
Khayrallah, M1
Wooters, TE1
Bardo, MT1
Bidwell, LC1
McClernon, FJ1
Gong, R1
Ding, C1
Hu, J1
Lu, Y1
Liu, F1
Mann, E1
Xu, F1
Cohen, MB1
Luo, M1
Lynch, LR1
Shaw, DM1
Wallace, SP1
Ciranni, MA1
Briggie, AM1
Kulaga, A1
O'Donnell, KE1
Barner, JC1
Khoza, S1
Oladapo, A1
Franzen, JD1
Mines, MA1
Jope, RS1
Sallee, FR1
Mazei-Robison, MS1
Richtand, NW1
Han, Q1
Hamilton, PJ1
Bowton, E1
Galli, A1
Veenstra-Vanderweele, J1
Gill, M1
Sandau, US1
Alderman, Z1
Corfas, G1
Ojeda, SR1
Raber, J1
Baumeister, AA1
Henderson, K1
Pow, JL1
Rothman, KJ1
Ólafsson, Ö1
Baldursson, G1
Almarsdóttir, AB1
Jónsdóttir, S1
Halldórsson, M1
Valdimarsdóttir, UA1
Shaw, M1
Coghill, D1
Hechtman, L3
Halmøy, A1
Pitman, JT1
Harris, NS1
O'Neill, B1
Gu, HH1
Perez, SM1
Shah, A1
Asher, A1
Lodge, DJ1
Turner, M1
Wilding, E1
Cassidy, E1
Adesman, AR1
Zetterström, R1
Le Pen, G1
Grottick, AJ1
Higgins, GA1
Moreau, JL1
ZRULL, JP1
WESTMAN, JC1
ARTHUR, B1
BELL, WA1
Diaz Heijtz, R1
Kolb, B1
Forssberg, H1
Avale, ME1
Falzone, TL1
Gelman, DM1
Low, MJ1
Grandy, DK1
Rubinstein, M1
Shintani, N1
Tanaka, K1
Hashimoto, H1
Baba, A1
Spencer, T2
Carboni, E1
Silvagni, A1
Wozniak, J1
Jou, R1
Handen, B1
Hardan, A1
Dodson, WW1
Quinn, PO1
Monuteaux, M1
Ricaurte, GA1
Mechan, AO1
Yuan, J1
Hatzidimitriou, G1
Xie, T1
Mayne, AH1
McCann, UD1
McDonnell, MA1
Dougherty, M1
Kitayama, S1
Sogawa, C1
Fletcher, PJ1
Tenn, CC1
Rizos, Z1
Lovic, V1
Kapur, S1
Samuels, JA1
Franco, K1
Wan, F1
Sorof, JM1
Kinkead, B1
Selz, KA1
Owens, MJ1
Mandell, AJ1
Grönlund, MA1
Aring, E1
Landgren, M1
Hellström, A1
Epstein, JN1
Conners, CK1
Hervey, AS1
Tonev, ST1
Arnold, LE5
Abikoff, HB1
Elliott, G1
Greenhill, LL1
Hoagwood, K1
Hinshaw, SP1
Hoza, B1
Jensen, PS1
March, JS1
Pelham, WE1
Severe, JB1
Swanson, JM2
Wells, K1
Vitiello, B1
Wigal, T1
Waldron, T1
Donner, R1
Ambrosini, PJ1
Langendijk, PN1
Wilde, AA1
Cox, DJ2
Moore, M2
Thorndike, F1
Muller, C1
Kovatchev, B2
Kalverdijk, LJ1
Buitelaar, JK1
van der Gaag, RJ1
Nowak, P1
Bortel, A1
Dabrowska, J1
Oswiecimska, J1
Drosik, M1
Kwiecinski, A1
Opara, J1
Kostrzewa, RM1
Brus, R1
Boellner, SW1
Childress, A1
Lopez, FA1
Krishnan, S1
Zhang, Y1
Quintana, H1
Cherlin, EA1
Duesenberg, DA1
Bangs, ME1
Ramsey, JL1
Feldman, PD1
Allen, AJ1
Kelsey, DK1
Goodman, DW1
Asheim, H1
Nilsen, KB1
Johansen, K1
Gualtieri, CT1
Johnson, LG1
Zhu, HJ1
Wang, JS1
Donovan, JL1
Jiang, Y1
Gibson, BB1
DeVane, CL1
Gustafsson, P2
Hansson, K1
Eidevall, L1
Thernlund, G2
Svedin, CG1
Dupont, RL1
Bucher, RH1
Wilford, BB1
Coleman, JJ1
Burket, R1
Mikami, AY1
Williams, DW1
Moore, RJ1
Michelson, D1
Kulkarni, RS1
Rowley, HL1
Wray, SR1
Melville, GN1
Grell, GA1
Edge, PC1
Hartley, LR1
Mailman, RB1
Lewis, MH1
Kilts, CD1
McIntyre, HB1
Firemark, HM1
Cho, AK1
Bodner, L1
Gomez, M1
Scholander, T1
Gross, MD2
Stovner, AM1
Wyller, TB1
Skulberg, A1
Os, L1
Korsmo, G1
Schaller, JL1
Behar, D1
Gillberg, C1
Melander, H1
Hägglöf, B1
Eidevall-Wallin, L1
Kopp, S1
Seeman, P1
Madras, BK1
Greenhill, L1
Waslick, B1
Cantwell, D1
Clevenger, W1
Davies, M1
Lerner, M1
Regino, R1
Fineberg, E1
Baren, M1
Browne, R1
Martinez, D1
Gelernter, J1
Abi-Dargham, A1
van Dyck, CH1
Kegeles, L1
Innis, RB1
Laruelle, M1
Fernell, E1
Grov, B1
Garåsen, H1
Sund, AM1
Zeiner, P1
Brase, DA1
Loh, HH1
Huestis, RD3
Wemmer, D2
Smeltzer, DJ3
Scheib, J1
Colner, G1
Shaywitz, BA1
Yager, RD1
Klopper, JH1
Mangold, B1
Schulz, E1
Remschmidt, H1
Gadow, KD1
Donnelly, M1
Rapoport, JL1
Ismond, DR1
Eichlseder, W1
Denhoff, E1
Millichap, JG1
Sroufe, LA1
Stewart, MA1
Wender, PH4
Sobotka, TJ1
Cook, MP1
DiPalma, JR1
Meyerhoff, JL2
Snyder, SH2
Erenberg, G1
Kirilcuk, V1
Corson, SA1
Corson, EO1
Omenn, GS1
Lightfoot, OB1
Reece, RM1
Chapel, JL1
Verret, S1
Glós, J1
Buchsbaum, M1
Wender, P1
Peters, JE1
Howell, MC1
Rever, GW1
Scholl, ML1
Trowbridge, F1
Rutledge, A1

Clinical Trials (20)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
A Phase 1 Open-label Study of the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of d- and l-Amphetamine After Multiple Daily Doses of SHP465 6.25 mg Administered in Children Aged 4 to 5 Years With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder[NCT03327402]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-03-13Completed
Amphetamine Extended-Release Tablets in the Treatment of Adults With ADHD[NCT03834766]Phase 3130 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-02-06Completed
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Multicenter, Placebo-controlled, Forced-dose Titration, Safety and Efficacy Study of SHP465 in Adults Aged 18-55 Years With Attention-deficit/ Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)[NCT02604407]Phase 3275 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-11-19Completed
Adjuvant Effects of Vitamin A and Vitamin D Supplementation on Treatment of Children With ADHD:A Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo-controlled, Multicentric Trial.[NCT04284059]Phase 4504 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-02-25Recruiting
Dyanavel® XR Extended-Release Oral Suspension in the Treatment of Children Wit[NCT03088267]Phase 318 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-02-11Completed
A Multicenter, Dose-Optimized, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Crossover Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of AR11 (Amphetamine Sulfate) in Pediatric Patients (Ages 6-12) With ADHD in a Laboratory Classroom[NCT01986062]Phase 497 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-12-31Completed
A Phase III, Randomized, Double-blind, Multi-center, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Safety and Efficacy Study of SPD465 in Adults With Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD).[NCT00150579]Phase 3240 participants Interventional2005-01-27Completed
A Multi-Center, Open Label, Evaluation of the Effect and Safety of Lisdexamfetamine in Children Aged 6-12 With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and Autism Spectrum Disorder[NCT03337646]Phase 448 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-09-26Active, not recruiting
A Phase IIIb Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Time Course of Treatment With ADDERALL XR and STRATTERA Compared to Placebo on Simulated Driving Safety and Performance and Cognitive Functioning in Adults With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD[NCT00557960]Phase 336 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-02-25Completed
A Phase II, Open-Label Co-Administration Study of SPD503 and Psychostimulants in Children and Adolescents Aged 6-17 With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)[NCT00151996]Phase 275 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-08-16Completed
Candidate Gene Screening for 6-14 Year Old Patients With ADHD (Attention Deficit/ Hyperactivity Disorder)[NCT03018574]100 participants (Actual)Observational2016-05-31Completed
A Within-Subject Cross-Over Comparison Between Immediate Release and Extended Release Adderall[NCT00468143]Phase 462 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-08-31Completed
The Assessment of Efficacy and Tolerability of Methylphenidate vs. Risperidone in the Treatment of Children and Adolescents With ADHD and Disruptive Disorders[NCT02063945]Phase 45 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-02-01Terminated (stopped due to Major difficulties recruiting participants)
Neurorehabilitation Through Hippotherapy on Neurofunctional Sequels of Brain Stroke: (i) Effect on Patient's Functional Independence, Sensorimotor and Cognitive Capacities and Quality of Life (ii) Effect on Caregivers' Quality of Life[NCT04759326]52 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-04-27Recruiting
Methylphenidate Effect on Performing Humphrey Visual Fields[NCT02162381]32 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-30Completed
Multimodal Treatment Study of Children With ADHD[NCT00000388]Phase 40 participants Interventional1998-09-30Completed
The Effects of Methylphenidate (MPH) and Non-invasive Brain Stimulation (tDCS) on Inhibitory Control Children With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)[NCT04964427]26 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-02-08Completed
A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo- and Active-Controlled, 3-Treatment, 3-Period, Crossover Study With One Week Per Treatment and Once-a-Day Dosing of Either NRP104, Adderall XR, or Placebo in Children Aged 6 to 12 Years With Attention-Deficit H[NCT00557011]Phase 252 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-09-30Completed
Effects of the Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Prevention of Cognitive Dysfunction in Elderly Patients Submitted to Cardiac Surgeries: Prospective, Randomized and Double-blind Study[NCT02549560]138 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-07-08Recruiting
Pharmacological Treatment of Rett Syndrome by Stimulation of Synaptic Maturation With Recombinant Human IGF-1(Mecasermin [rDNA] Injection)[NCT01777542]Phase 230 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-31Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

Change From Baseline in Height at Final On-Treatment Assessment

Height (in centimeters) was measured using a stadiometer with the participant standing on a flat surface without shoes and with the chin parallel to the floor. Final on-treatment assessment (FoTA) was defined as the last valid assessment obtained after baseline and while on IP (on or before 2 days after the last dose date). (NCT03327402)
Timeframe: FoTA (up to Day 30)

Interventioncentimeter (cm) (Mean)
SHP4651.601

Change From Baseline in Weight at Final On-Treatment Assessment

Weight (in kilograms) was measured using a calibrated scale. Participant should be in light clothes and without shoes. FoTA was defined as the last valid assessment obtained after baseline and while on IP (on or before 2 days after the last dose date). (NCT03327402)
Timeframe: FoTA (up to Day 30)

Interventionkilogram (kg) (Mean)
SHP465-0.305

Length of Time Awake Per Night Assessed by PSQ at Final On-Treatment Assessment

The PSQ was a 7-item questionnaire typically used to assess sleep quality with pharmacologic treatment. The questionnaire collected data on average time to sleep, sleep latency, frequency of interrupted sleep, duration of interrupted sleep, total sleep time and sleep quality over the last week. FoTA was defined as the last valid assessment obtained after baseline and while on IP (on or before 2 days after the last dose date). (NCT03327402)
Timeframe: FoTA (up to Day 30)

Interventionminutes (Mean)
SHP46510.1

Length of Time Sleeping Per Night Assessed by PSQ at Final On-Treatment Assessment

The PSQ was a 7-item questionnaire typically used to assess sleep quality with pharmacologic treatment. The questionnaire collected data on average time to sleep, sleep latency, frequency of interrupted sleep, duration of interrupted sleep, total sleep time and sleep quality over the last week. FoTA was defined as the last valid assessment obtained after baseline and while on IP (on or before 2 days after the last dose date). (NCT03327402)
Timeframe: FoTA (up to Day 30)

Interventionhours (Mean)
SHP4659.1

Length of Time to Fall Asleep Per Night Assessed by PSQ at Final On-Treatment Assessment

The PSQ was a 7-item questionnaire typically used to assess sleep quality with pharmacologic treatment. The questionnaire collected data on average time to sleep, sleep latency, frequency of interrupted sleep, duration of interrupted sleep, total sleep time and sleep quality over the last week. FoTA was defined as the last valid assessment obtained after baseline and while on IP (on or before 2 days after the last dose date). (NCT03327402)
Timeframe: FoTA (up to Day 30)

Interventionminutes (Mean)
SHP46519.8

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Clinical Laboratory Results Reported as TEAEs

Clinical laboratory tests included biochemistry, endocrinology, hematology and urinalysis. Any change in clinical laboratory results which are deemed clinically significant by the investigator were reported as TEAE. (NCT03327402)
Timeframe: From start of study drug administration up to follow-up (up to 5 weeks)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
SHP4650

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Reported as TEAEs

12-lead ECG were evaluated. Any change in ECG assessments which are deemed clinically significant by the investigator were reported as TEAE. (NCT03327402)
Timeframe: From start of study drug administration up to follow-up (up to 5 weeks)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
SHP4650

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs Reported as TEAEs

Vital sign assessments included blood pressure, pulse, respiratory rate and body temperature. Any change in vital signs which were deemed clinically significant by the investigator were recorded as TEAE. (NCT03327402)
Timeframe: From start of study drug administration up to follow-up (up to 5 weeks)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
SHP4651

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily had a causal relationship with this treatment. TEAEs was defined as AEs that start or deteriorate on or after the date of the first dose of investigational product (IP) and no later than 3 days following the last dose of IP. (NCT03327402)
Timeframe: From start of study drug administration up to follow-up (up to 5 weeks)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
SHP46511

Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vss/F) at Steady State of Plasma d-Amphetamine and Plasma l-Amphetamine

Apparent volume of distribution at steady state of plasma d-amphetamine and plasma l-amphetamine after oral dose administration were evaluated using rich sampling collection method.Values displayed do not necessarily reflect the actual precision obtained. (NCT03327402)
Timeframe: Week 4: Predose, 2, 5, 8, 12, 16, 24 hours (Day 8), 48 hours (Day 9) Postdose on Day 7

Interventionliter (Geometric Mean)
d-Amphetaminel-Amphetamine
SHP46590.09109.4

Area Under the Concentration Time Curve From Time Five Hours to the Last Timepoint (AUC5-t) of Plasma d-Amphetamine and Plasma l-Amphetamine

Area under the concentration time curve from time five hours to the time of last quantifiable concentration of plasma d-amphetamine and plasma l-amphetamine were evaluated using rich sampling collection method.Values displayed do not necessarily reflect the actual precision obtained. (NCT03327402)
Timeframe: Week 4: 5, 8, 12, 16, 24 hours (Day 8), 48 hours (Day 9) Postdose on Day 7

Interventionhr*ng/mL (Geometric Mean)
d-Amphetaminel-Amphetamine
SHP465549.9194.1

Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Time Five Hours to Twelve Hours Postdose (AUC5-12) of Plasma d-Amphetamine and Plasma l-Amphetamine

Area under the concentration-time curve from time five hours to twelve hours postdose (AUC5-12) in plasma d-amphetamine and plasma l-amphetamine were evaluated using rich sampling collection method.Values displayed do not necessarily reflect the actual precision obtained. (NCT03327402)
Timeframe: Week 4: 5, 8, 12 hours Postdose on Day 7

Interventionhr*ng/mL (Geometric Mean)
d-Amphetaminel-Amphetamine
SHP465195.261.88

Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Time of Dosing to the Last Measurable Concentration (AUClast) of Plasma d-Amphetamine and Plasma l-Amphetamine

Area under the concentration-time curve from time of dosing to the last measurable concentration of plasma d-amphetamine and plasma l-amphetamine were evaluated using rich sampling collection method. Values displayed do not necessarily reflect the actual precision obtained. (NCT03327402)
Timeframe: Week 4: Predose, 2, 5, 8, 12, 16, 24 hours (Day 8), 48 hours (Day 9) Postdose on Day 7

Interventionhr*ng/mL (Geometric Mean)
d-Amphetaminel-Amphetamine
SHP465646.3222.1

Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Time Sixteen Hours to Twenty-Four Hours Postdose (AUC16-24) of Plasma d-Amphetamine and Plasma l-Amphetamine

Area under the concentration-time curve from time sixteen hours to twenty-four hours postdose (AUC16-24) in plasma d-amphetamine and plasma l-amphetamine were evaluated using rich sampling collection method. Values displayed do not necessarily reflect the actual precision obtained. (NCT03327402)
Timeframe: Week 4: 16, 24 hours (Day 8) Postdose on Day 7

Interventionhr*ng/mL (Geometric Mean)
d-Amphetaminel-Amphetamine
SHP465122.143.44

Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Time Twelve Hours to Sixteen Hours Postdose (AUC12-16) of Plasma d-Amphetamine and Plasma l-Amphetamine

Area under the concentration-time curve from time twelve hours to sixteen hours postdose (AUC12-16) in plasma d-amphetamine and plasma l-amphetamine were evaluated using rich sampling collection method. Values displayed do not necessarily reflect the actual precision obtained. (NCT03327402)
Timeframe: Week 4: 12, 16 hours Postdose on Day 7

Interventionhr*ng/mL (Geometric Mean)
d-Amphetaminel-Amphetamine
SHP46589.6829.92

Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero Predose to Five Hours Postdose (AUC0-5) of Plasma d-Amphetamine and Plasma l-Amphetamine

Area under the concentration time curve from time zero predose to five hours postdose of plasma d-amphetamine and plasma d-amphetamine were evaluated using rich sampling collection method. Values displayed do not necessarily reflect the actual precision obtained. (NCT03327402)
Timeframe: Week 4: Predose, 2, 5 hours Postdose on Day 7

Interventionhr*ng/mL (Geometric Mean)
d-Amphetaminel-Amphetamine
SHP465109.734.53

Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to the Last Timepoint (AUC0-t) During Sample Collection of Plasma d-Amphetamine and Plasma l-Amphetamine

Area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration of plasma d-amphetamine and plasma l-amphetamine were evaluated using rich sampling collection method. Values displayed do not necessarily reflect the actual precision obtained. (NCT03327402)
Timeframe: Week 4: Predose, 2, 5, 8, 12, 16, 24 hours (Day 8), 48 hours (Day 9) Postdose on Day 7

Interventionhour*nanogram per milliliter (hr*ng/mL) (Geometric Mean)
d-Amphetaminel-Amphetamine
SHP465646.3222.1

Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve Over the Dosing Interval (24 Hours) at Steady State (AUCtau,ss) of Plasma d-Amphetamine and Plasma l-Amphetamine

Area under the concentration-time curve over the dosing interval (24 hours) at steady state of plasma d-amphetamine and plasma l-amphetamine were evaluated using rich sampling collection method. Values displayed do not necessarily reflect the actual precision obtained. (NCT03327402)
Timeframe: Week 4: Predose, 2, 5, 8, 12, 16, 24 hours (Day 8), 48 hours (Day 9) Postdose on Day 7

Interventionhr*ng/mL (Geometric Mean)
d-Amphetaminel-Amphetamine
SHP465520.6171.0

Maximum Plasma Drug Concentration (Cmax) Occurred at the Time of Maximum Observed Concentration Sampled During a Dosing Interval (Tmax) of Plasma Dextroamphetamine (d-Amphetamine) and Plasma Levoamphetamine (l-Amphetamine)

Maximum plasma drug concentration occurred at time of maximum observed concentration of plasma d-amphetamine and plasma l-amphetamine during a dosing interval were evaluated using rich sampling collection method. Values displayed do not necessarily reflect the actual precision obtained. (NCT03327402)
Timeframe: Week 4: Predose, 2, 5, 8, 12, 16, 24 hours (Day 8), 48 hours (Day 9) Postdose on Day 7

Interventionnanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) (Geometric Mean)
d-Amphetaminel-Amphetamine
SHP46531.379.895

Number of Participants With a Positive Response in Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) at Final On-Treatment Assessment

C-SSRS was a semi-structured interview that captures the occurrence, severity, and frequency of suicide-related thoughts (suicidal ideation) and suicidal behaviors during the assessment period needed to be determine if a suicide-related thought or behavior were occurred. The assessment was done by the nature of the responses, not by a numbered scale. FoTA was defined as the last valid assessment obtained after baseline and while on IP (on or before 2 days after the last dose date). (NCT03327402)
Timeframe: FoTA (up to Day 30)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Suicidal IdeationSuicidal Behavior
SHP46500

Number of Participants With Overall Quality of Sleep Assessed by Post Sleep Questionnaire (PSQ) at Final On-Treatment Assessment

The PSQ was a 7-item questionnaire typically used to assess sleep quality with pharmacologic treatment. The questionnaire collected data on average time to sleep, sleep latency, frequency of interrupted sleep, duration of interrupted sleep, total sleep time and sleep quality over the last week. The assessment was done by the nature of the responses, not by a numbered scale. FoTA was defined as the last valid assessment obtained after baseline and while on IP (on or before 2 days after the last dose date). (NCT03327402)
Timeframe: FoTA (up to Day 30)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
FoTA: Overall quality of sleep - Very poorFoTA: Overall quality of sleep - PoorFoTA: Overall quality of sleep - AverageFoTA: Overall quality of sleep - GoodFoTA: Overall quality of sleep - Very Good
SHP465046113

Observed Analyte Concentration at 12 Hours After Dose Administration (C12) of Plasma d-Amphetamine and Plasma l-Amphetamine

Observed analyte concentration of plasma d-amphetamine and plasma l-amphetamine at 12 hours after dose administration were evaluated using rich sampling collection method. Values displayed do not necessarily reflect the actual precision obtained. (NCT03327402)
Timeframe: Week 4: 12 hours (Day 8) Postdose on Day 7

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
d-Amphetaminel-Amphetamine
SHP46524.598.059

Observed Analyte Concentration at 16 Hours After Dose Administration (C16) of Plasma d-Amphetamine and Plasma l- Amphetamine

Observed analyte concentration of plasma d-amphetamine and plasma l-amphetamine at 16 hours after dose administration were evaluated using rich sampling collection method.Values displayed do not necessarily reflect the actual precision obtained. (NCT03327402)
Timeframe: Week 4: 16 hours (Day 8) Postdose on Day 7

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
d-Amphetaminel-Amphetamine
SHP46520.536.957

Observed Analyte Concentration at 24 Hours After Dose Administration (C24) of Plasma d-Amphetamine and Plasma l- Amphetamine

Observed analyte concentration of plasma d-amphetamine and plasma l-amphetamine at 24 hours after dose administration were evaluated using rich sampling collection method.Values displayed do not necessarily reflect the actual precision obtained. (NCT03327402)
Timeframe: Week 4: 24 hours (Day 8) Postdose on Day 7

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
d-Amphetaminel-Amphetamine
SHP46511.164.186

Terminal Half-life (t1/2) of Plasma d-Amphetamine and Plasma l-Amphetamine

Time required for the plasma drug concentration to reach half of its original value of plasma d-amphetamine and plasma l-amphetamine were evaluated using rich sampling collection method.Values displayed do not necessarily reflect the actual precision obtained. (NCT03327402)
Timeframe: Week 4: Predose, 2, 5, 8, 12, 16, 24 hours (Day 8), 48 hours (Day 9) Postdose on Day 7

Interventionhour (Median)
d-Amphetaminel-Amphetamine
SHP4659.91112.16

Terminal Rate Constant (Lambda z) of Plasma d-Amphetamine and Plasma l-Amphetamine

Terminal Rate Constant of plasma d-amphetamine and plasma l-amphetamine were evaluated using rich sampling collection method.Values displayed do not necessarily reflect the actual precision obtained. (NCT03327402)
Timeframe: Week 4: Predose, 2, 5, 8, 12, 16, 24 hours (Day 8), 48 hours (Day 9) Postdose on Day 7

Interventionper hour (Geometric Mean)
d-Amphetaminel-Amphetamine
SHP4650.066390.05632

Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Drug Concentration (Tmax) During Dosing Interval of Plasma d-Amphetamine and Plasma l-Amphetamine

Time to reach maximum observed plasma drug concentration of plasma d-amphetamine and plasma l-amphetamine during a dosing interval were evaluated using rich sampling collection method. Values displayed do not necessarily reflect the actual precision obtained. (NCT03327402)
Timeframe: Week 4: Predose, 2, 5, 8, 12, 16, 24 hours (Day 8), 48 hours (Day 9) Postdose on Day 7

Interventionhour (Median)
d-Amphetaminel-Amphetamine
SHP4657.9177.917

Total Body Clearance (CL/F) for Extravascular Administration of Plasma d-Amphetamine and Plasma l-Amphetamine

Apparent total clearance of the plasma drug concentration of plasma d- amphetamine and plasma l-amphetamine after oral dose administration were evaluated using rich sampling collection method.Values displayed do not necessarily reflect the actual precision obtained. (NCT03327402)
Timeframe: Week 4: Predose, 2, 5, 8, 12, 16, 24 hours (Day 8), 48 hours (Day 9) Postdose on Day 7

InterventionLiter per hour (L/hr) (Geometric Mean)
d-Amphetaminel-Amphetamine
SHP4655.6185.703

Total Sleep Disturbance Score of Children's Sleep Habits Questionnaire (CSHQ ) at Final On-Treatment Assessment

The CSHQ was a validated, retrospective, parent-reported sleep screening tool. The questionnaire consisted of 35 items that yield a TSD score, as well as 8 subscale scores, including bedtime resistance, sleep duration, parasomnias, sleep disordered breathing, night wakings, daytime sleepiness, sleep anxiety, and sleep onset delay. Each item receives a score from 1 (meaning the problem occurs rarely) to 3 (meaning the problem usually occurs); therefore, a higher score is the worse outcome. Scale ranges are as follows: Bedtime Resistance: 6 to 18, Sleep Onset Delay: 1 to 3, Sleep Duration: 3 to 9, Sleep Anxiety: 4 to 12, Night Wakings: 3 to 9, Parasomnias: 7 to 21, Disordered Breathing: 3 to 9, Daytime Sleepiness: 8 to 24, and Total Disturbance (items from all scales): 33 to 99. A negative value indicated less sleep disturbance. (NCT03327402)
Timeframe: FoTA (up to Day 30)

InterventionUnits on scale (Mean)
FoTA: Total Sleep Disturbance ScoreFoTA: Bedtime ResistanceFoTA: Sleep Onset DelayFoTA: Sleep DurationFoTA: Sleep AnxietyFoTA: Night WakingsFoTA: ParasomniasFoTA: Sleep Disordered BreathingFoTA: Daytime Sleepiness
SHP46545.410.11.44.36.24.18.93.210.6

Trough Plasma Drug Concentration Ctrough at Steady State (Ctrough,ss) of Plasma d-Amphetamine and Plasma l-Amphetamine

Trough plasma drug concentration (predose concentrations collected at steady state) of plasma d-amphetamine and plasma l-amphetamine were evaluated using rich sampling collection method. Values displayed do not necessarily reflect the actual precision obtained. (NCT03327402)
Timeframe: Predose on Day 1 and Day 28 and at 24 hours (Day 29) postdose on Day 28

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
d-Amphetaminel-Amphetamine
SHP4657.9343.092

Change From Baseline to Visit 5 on DSST

The Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) is a paper-and-pencil cognitive test presented on a single sheet of paper that requires a subject to match symbols to numbers according to a key located on the top of the page. The DSST is sensitive to the presence of cognitive dysfunction as well as to change in cognitive function. The DSST is a 90 second test requiring participants to match symbols with numbers according to a code. Potential scores range from 0 to 100, and lower scores indicate worse performance. (NCT03834766)
Timeframe: From baseline to week 5

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
AMPH ER Tab4.8
Matching Placebo6.5

Lean Squares Mean (± Standard Error) of Math Test Score Over All Post-dose Time Points (0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12, 13, and 14 Hours Post-dose) Assessed During the Administration of Serial Math Tests at Visit 5 (Week 5)

The Total Math Score is the sum of the number of math problems attempted plus the number of math problems answered correctly and it provides an objective measure of performance that is time-sensitive, ADHD medication-sensitive, and well documented as a measure to evaluate ADHD medication effectiveness throughout the day. The Total Math Score ranges from 0-800 with higher scores indicating better performance. (NCT03834766)
Timeframe: Pre-dose to 14 hour post-dose

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
AMPH ER Tab259.5
Matching Placebo260.6

Change From Baseline in AISRS Total Score at Each Post-baseline Visit

AISRS scale was developed to better capture symptoms of ADHD in adult patients. The scale has 18 items scored as follows: 0 (none), 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), 3 (severe). The maximum total score for the scale is 54 points. (NCT03834766)
Timeframe: Baseline, Visit 1 (week 1), Visit 2 (week 2), Visit 3 (week 3), Visit 4 (week 4), Visit 5 (week 5)

,
InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Visit 1Visit 2Visit 3Visit 4Visit 5
AMPH ER Tab-7.2-11.2-15-15.4-15.9
Matching Placebo-5.3-8.1-8.8-9.3-9.5

Change From Baseline in CGI-S Total Score at Each Post-baseline Visit

The Clinical Global Impression - Severity scale (CGI-S) is a 7-point scale that requires the clinician to rate the severity of the patient's illness at the time of assessment, relative to the clinician's past experience with patients who have the same diagnosis. Possible ratings are: 1=normal, not at all ill; 2=borderline mentally ill; 3=mildly ill; 4=moderately ill; 5=markedly ill; 6=severely ill; 7=among the most extremely ill patients. (NCT03834766)
Timeframe: Baseline, Visit 1 (week 1), Visit 2 (week 2), Visit 3 (week 3), Visit 4 (week 4), Visit 5 (week 5)

,
InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Visit 1Visit 2Visit 3Visit 4Visit 5
AMPH ER Tab-0.6-1.0-1.3-1.4-1.3
Matching Placebo-0.3-0.6-0.6-0.8-0.7

Change From Baseline on Total Math Test Score Over Each Post-dose Time Points (0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12, 13, and 14 Hours Post-dose) Assessed During the Administration of Serial Math Tests at Visit 5 (Week 5)

The Total Math Score is the sum of the number of math problems attempted plus the number of math problems answered correctly and it provides an objective measure of performance that is time-sensitive, ADHD medication-sensitive, and well documented as a measure to evaluate ADHD medication effectiveness throughout the day. The Total Math Score ranges from 0-800 with higher scores indicating better performance. (NCT03834766)
Timeframe: Visit 5 (week 5)

,
InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
0.5 hours1 hours2 hours4 hours8 hours10 hours12 hours13 hours14 hours
AMPH ER Tab64.567.984.481.778.881.285.288.889
Matching Placebo39.727.847.053.048.253.858.347.762.9

Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Score at Visit 6 (Week 4)

CGI scales permit a global evaluation of the participant's severity and improvement over time. CGI-I was performed to rate the severity of a participant's condition on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill participants). (NCT02604407)
Timeframe: Visit 6 (Week 4)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo3.1
SHP465 12.5 mg2.4
SHP465 37.5 mg1.9

Change From Baseline in the Adult Attention-deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-4 (ADHD-RS) With Prompts Total Score at Visit 6 (Week 4)

The ADHD-RS was developed to measure the behaviors of children with Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The adult ADHD-RS with prompts consists of 18 items designated to reflect current symptomatology of ADHD based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) criteria. Each item is scored on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 3 (severe symptoms), with the total score for the rating scale ranging from 0 to 54. Higher score = more severe symptoms.The scale is subdivided into 2 subscales of 9 symptoms each: hyperactivity/impulsivity and inattentiveness. Adult prompts are included with the ADHD-RS to create a semistructured measurement that allows the clinician to probe the extent, frequency, breadth, severity, and consequences of these symptoms to ascertain impairment in an adult population. (NCT02604407)
Timeframe: Baseline, Visit 6 (Week 4)

,,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange at Visit 6
Placebo40.5-11.0
SHP465 12.5 mg39.8-18.1
SHP465 37.5 mg39.9-23.8

Change in Swanson, Kotkin, Agler, M-Flynn, and Pelham (SKAMP) Combined Scores, Baseline to 30 Minutes Post Dose

Change in SKAMP-C (Swanson, Kotkin, Agler, M-Flynn, and Pelham combined) score from pre-dose, by treatment. The SKAMP-C is a rating scale that assesses functional impairment related to ADHD in the classroom, including the performance of academic tasks, following class rules, and interacting with peers and adults in the classroom. The SKAMP-C is a 13-item, 7-score rating system (0=normal to 7=maximal impairment). The higher the score, the worse the impairment. A decrease from baseline in the combined (all 13 items) score indicates improvement. The SKAMP-C is used to assess the time course of treatment effects in laboratory classroom studies. (NCT03088267)
Timeframe: Change in SKAMP-C score from baseline to 30 minutes postdose.

Interventionnumber of questions answered correctly (Least Squares Mean)
Active Treatment-6.1
Placebo Treatment2.5

Change in Permanent Product Measure of Performance (PERMP-C) Score (Problems Answered Correctly)

Change from pre-dose in PERMP-C scores (Permanent Product Measure of Performance; defined as the number of problems attempted and number of problems solved correctly) at 30 minutes post-dose and at 3 hours post-dose. The PERMP-C is designed to assess compliance and academic productivity in school children. It is a 10-minute timed test in which the number of problems attempted and correct are assessed prior to and after an intervention. Scoring is based on problems attempted and correct. An increase in numerical score is indicative of improvement. (NCT03088267)
Timeframe: 30 minutes postdose and 3 hours postdose

,
InterventionChange from baseline in PERMP score (Least Squares Mean)
Change from predose in PERMP-C at 30 minutesChange from predose in PERMP-C at 3 hours
Active Treatment14.452.4
Placebo Treatment-4.7-7.9

SKAMP-Combined Scores

Swanson, Kotkin, Agler, M-Flynn, and Pelham Scale [SKAMP]-combined scores measured during Laboratory Classroom Days. The SKAMP scale is a validated subjective measure of ADHD symptoms in a laboratory classroom, comprised of 13 items on which subjects are rated according to a 7 point scale (0=normal to 6=maximal impairment); maximum score 78. The SKAMP-combined score is obtained by summing the rating values for each of the 13 items, whereby the higher the SKAMP score, the greater the impairment. (NCT01986062)
Timeframe: 2 hours post-dose

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
AR11 (Amphetamine Sulfate)10.0
Placebo17.8

PERM-P Scores - Number of Problems Attempted

Permanent Product Measure of Performance (PERMP) assessments measured during Laboratory Classroom Days. The PERMP is an individualized, five-page math exam consisting of 400 problems. Subjects are instructed to complete as many math problems as possible in 10 minutes. Performance is evaluated using the number of problems attempted (maximum score = 400) and the number of problems correct (maximum score = 400). (NCT01986062)
Timeframe: 0.75, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 hours post-dose

,
Interventionnumber of problems attempted (Mean)
0.75 hours post-dose2.0 hours post-dose4.0 hours post-dose6.0 hours post-dose8.0 hours post-dose10.0 hours post-dose
AR11 (Amphetamine Sulfate)111.6113.4113.2101.398.295.2
Placebo91.285.785.174.976.476.3

PERM-P Scores - Number of Problems Correct

Permanent Product Measure of Performance (PERMP) assessments measured during Laboratory Classroom Days. The PERMP is an individualized, five-page math exam consisting of 400 problems. Subjects are instructed to complete as many math problems as possible in 10 minutes. Performance is evaluated using the number of problems attempted (maximum score = 400) and the number of problems correct (maximum score = 400). (NCT01986062)
Timeframe: 0.75, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 hours post-dose

,
Interventionnumber of problems correct (Mean)
0.75 hours post-dose2.0 hours post-dose4.0 hours post-dose6.0 hours post-dose8.0 hours post-dose10.0 hours post-dose
AR11 (Amphetamine Sulfate)104.5107.1107.095.692.789.9
Placebo83.978.979.970.571.572.3

SKAMP Subscale - Attention Scores

The SKAMP scale is a validated subjective measure of ADHD symptoms. It is comprised of 13 items (grouped under the subcategories of attention, deportment, quality of work, and compliance) on which subjects are rated according to a 7-point scale (0 = normal to 6 = maximal impairment). The SKAMP-Attention subscale score is comprised of four of the 13 items with a maximum score of 24. (NCT01986062)
Timeframe: 0.75, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 hours post-dose

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
0.75 hours post-dose2.0 hours post-dose4.0 hours post-dose6.0 hours post-dose8.0 hours post-dose10.0 hours post-dose
AR11 (Amphetamine Sulfate)2.21.92.22.32.83.2
Placebo3.43.44.03.64.14.0

SKAMP Subscale - Deportment Scores

The SKAMP scale is a validated subjective measure of ADHD symptoms. It is comprised of 13 items (grouped under the subcategories of attention, deportment, quality of work, and compliance) on which subjects are rated according to a 7-point scale (0 = normal to 6 = maximal impairment). The SKAMP-Deportment subscale score is comprised of four of the 13 items with a maximum score of 24. (NCT01986062)
Timeframe: 0.75, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 hours post-dose

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
0.75 hours post-dose2.0 hours post-dose4.0 hours post-dose6.0 hours post-dose8.0 hours post-dose10.0 hours post-dose
AR11 (Amphetamine Sulfate)2.11.62.13.13.53.1
Placebo3.94.04.74.34.94.9

SKAMP-Combined Scores

Swanson, Kotkin, Agler, M-Flynn, and Pelham Scale [SKAMP]-combined scores measured during Laboratory Classroom Days. The SKAMP scale is a validated subjective measure of ADHD symptoms in a laboratory classroom, comprised of 13 items on which subjects are rated according to a 7 point scale (0=normal to 6=maximal impairment); maximum score 78. The SKAMP-combined score is obtained by summing the rating values for each of the 13 items, whereby the higher the SKAMP score, the greater the impairment. (NCT01986062)
Timeframe: 0.75, 4, 6, 8, 10 hours post-dose

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
0.75 hours post-dose4 hours post-dose6 hours post-dose8 hours post-dose10 hours post-dose
AR11 (Amphetamine Sulfate)11.811.614.516.016.5
Placebo17.319.820.222.020.8

Change From Baseline in Conner's Parent Rating Scale-revised Short Version (CPRS-R) Total Score at 6 Weeks

The Conner's Parent Rating Scale-revised short version (CPRS-R) consists of 27 questions graded on a scale from 0 (not true at all) to 3 (very much true) with a total score ranging from 0 to 81. Higher scores are indicative of increased ADHD. This scale allows parents to respond on the basis of the child's behavior and help assess ADHD and evaluate problem behavior. (NCT00151996)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 weeks

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Mean)
Methylphenidate + SPD503-22.18
Amphetamine + SPD503-16.28

Change From Baseline in the Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale (ADHD-RS-IV) Total Score at 6 Weeks

Change in the Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-fourth edition (ADHD-RS-IV) total score from baseline. The ADHD-RS-IV consists of 18 items scored on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 3 (severe symptoms) with total score ranging from 0 to 54. (NCT00151996)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 weeks

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Mean)
Methylphenidate + SPD503-17.8
Amphetamine + SPD503-13.8

Number of Participants With Improvement on Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scores

Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) consists of a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Improvement is defined as a score of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved) on the scale. (NCT00151996)
Timeframe: 6 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Methylphenidate + SPD50328
Amphetamine + SPD50318

Number of Participants With Improvement on Parent Global Assessment (PGA) Scores

Parent Global Assessment (PGA) consists of a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). The PGA is designed to capture parent's opinions of their child's disease (ADHD) severity and improvement. Improvement is defined as a score of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved) on the scale. (NCT00151996)
Timeframe: 6 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Methylphenidate + SPD50332
Amphetamine + SPD50321

Change From Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire-Parent Form (CHQ-PF50) Scores at 6 Weeks

The Child Health Questionnaire-Parent Form (CHQ-PF50) was developed to measure the physical and psychosocial well-being of children aged 5 years of age and older. Total scoring ranges from 0-100 for each. Increases in scores represent improved well-being in subjects as assessed by their parents. (NCT00151996)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 weeks

,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Physical Summary ScorePsychosocial Summary Score
Amphetamine + SPD5030.2211.56
Methylphenidate + SPD503-0.388.98

Medication Event Monitoring System (MEMS®) Dosage Adherence

Dosage adherence (MEMSd) is the number of bottle openings divided by number of doses prescribed. Adherence was measured as ≥ 75% of the doses. The number below is the total percentage of subjects who were adherent. (NCT00468143)
Timeframe: The MEMS information was noted at clinic visit 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, and 9 (over 8 weeks)

Interventionpercentage of participants adherent (Number)
Adderall IR (Methamphetamine Salts)42.7
Adderall XR (Methamphetamine Salts)66.2

Medication Event Monitoring System (MEMS®) Regimen Adherence

Regimen adherence (MEMSr) is a percentage of the number of days in which the complete dose regimen was taken as prescribed. Adherence was measured as complete dose regimen taken on ≥ 90% of days. The number below is the total percentage of subjects who were adherent. (NCT00468143)
Timeframe: The MEMS information was noted at clinic visit 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, and 9 (over 8 weeks)

Interventionpercentage of participants adherent (Number)
Adderall IR (Methamphetamine Salts)2.5
Adderall XR (Methamphetamine Salts)34.4

Medication Event Monitoring System (MEMS®) Time Adherence

Time adherence (MEMSt) is the percentage of doses taken as prescribed within a specified time period. Adherence was measured as ≥ 80% of doses taken at the correct time. The number below is the percentage of subjects who were adherent. (NCT00468143)
Timeframe: The MEMS information was noted at clinic visit 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, and 9 (over 8 weeks)

Interventionpercentage of participants adherent (Number)
Adderall IR (Methamphetamine Salts)4.5
Adderall XR (Methamphetamine Salts)43.7

Pill Count

Study staff counted unused medication at each weekly visit to yield a percentage of prescribed pills that were consumed. For each group, the number given will be the total number of consumed pills divided by total number of pill prescribed. (NCT00468143)
Timeframe: At clinic visit 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, and 9 (over 8 weeks)

Interventionpercentage of pills consumed (Number)
Adderall IR (Methamphetamine Salts)90.4
Adderall XR (Methamphetamine Salts)96.9

Self Report

Self-reported adherence was ascertained via retrospective self-report of daily regimen adherence. Participants were considered adherent for Adderall IR (Methamphetamine salts) if they took the first does in the morning within 30 minutes of waking, and then each subsequent dose in 5-hour intervals (within 30 minutes). For Adderall XR (Methamphetamine salts), participants were considered adherent if they took the single daily dose in the morning within 30 minutes of waking. The number given below represents the total number of self-reported adherent participants divided by the total number of participants per group, times 100 (to obtain percentage). (NCT00468143)
Timeframe: At clinic visit 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, and 9 (over 8 weeks)

Interventionpercentage of participants adherent (Number)
Adderall IR (Methamphetamine Salts)92.6
Adderall XR (Methamphetamine Salts)98.8

Aberrant Behavior Checklist - Community Edition (ABC-C)

"The ABC-C is a global behavior checklist implemented for the measurement of drug and other treatment effects in populations with intellectual disability. Behavior based on 58 items that describe various behavioral problems.~Each item is rated on the parents perceived severity of the behavior. The answer options for each item are:~0 = Not a problem~= Problem but slight in degree~= Moderately serious problem~= Severe in degree~The measure is broken down into the following subscales with individual ranges as follows:~Subscale I (Irritability): 15 items, score range = 0-45 Subscale II (Lethargy): 16 items, score range = 0-48 Subscale III (Stereotypy): 7 items, score range = 0-21 Subscale IV (Hyperactivity): 16 items, score range = 0-48 Subscale V (Inappropriate Speech) was not included in the breakdown because it was not applicable (no participants in the study had verbal language)." (NCT01777542)
Timeframe: Every 5 weeks during each of the two 20-week treatment periods, and once 4 weeks after final treatment ends

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Visit 1 - First Intervention: Subscale IVisit 3 - First Intervention: Subscale IVisit 5 - First Intervention: Subscale IVisit 6 - Second Intervention: Subscale IVisit 8 - Second Intervention: Subscale IVisit 10 - Second Intervention: Subscale IFollow-up: Subscale I (Irritability)Visit 1 - First Intervention: Subscale IIVisit 3 - First Intervention: Subscale IIVisit 5 - First Intervention: Subscale IIVisit 6 - Second Intervention: Subscale IIVisit 8 - Second Intervention: Subscale IIVisit 10 - Second Intervention: Subscale IIFollow-up: Subscale II (Lethargy)Visit 1 - First Intervention: Subscale IIIVisit 3 - First Intervention: Subscale IIIVisit 5 - First Intervention: Subscale IIIVisit 6 - Second Intervention: Subscale IIIVisit 8 - Second Intervention: Subscale IIIVisit 10 - Second Intervention: Subscale IIIFollow-up: Subscale III (Stereotypy)Visit 1 - First Intervention: Subscale IVVisit 3 - First Intervention: Subscale IVVisit 5 - First Intervention: Subscale IVVisit 6 - Second Intervention: Subscale IVVisit 8 - Second Intervention: Subscale IVVisit 10 - Second Intervention: Subscale IVFollow-up: Subscale IV (Hyperactivity)
Placebo First, Then rhIGF-19.009.007.007.004.005.003.0013.0011.009.0011.008.006.006.0013.0010.0011.0011.0010.008.008.0013.0012.0011.0011.007.0010.009.00
rhIGF-1 First, Then Placebo6.004.002.004.003.005.002.008.007.006.005.005.004.005.0012.0010.009.0011.009.009.009.008.008.006.007.004.005.005.00

Anxiety, Depression, and Mood Scale (ADAMS)

"Remaining subscales of the ADAMS that are not primary outcome measures include: Manic/hyperactive, Depressed mood, General anxiety, Obsessive/compulsive behavior.~The range for each subscale is as follows:~Manic/Hyperactive Behavior: 0-15 Depressed Mood: 0-21 General Anxiety: 0-21 Obsessive/Compulsive Behavior: 0-9~The higher the score for each subscale, the more problematic the behavior." (NCT01777542)
Timeframe: Every 5 weeks during each of the two 20-week treatment periods, and once 4 weeks after final treatment ends

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Visit 1- First Intervention: Manic/HyperactiveVisit 2- First Intervention: Manic/HyperactiveVisit 3- First Intervention: Manic/HyperactiveVisit 4- First Intervention: Manic/HyperactiveVisit 5- First Intervention: Manic/HyperactiveVisit 6- Second Intervention: Manic/HyperactiveVisit 7- Second Intervention: Manic/HyperactiveVisit 8- Second Intervention: Manic/HyperactiveVisit 9- Second Intervention: Manic/HyperactiveVisit 10- First Intervention: Manic/HyperactiveFollow-up: Manic/Hyperactive SubscaleVisit 1- First Intervention: Depressed MoodVisit 2- First Intervention: Depressed MoodVisit 3- First Intervention: Depressed MoodVisit 4- First Intervention: Depressed MoodVisit 5- First Intervention: Depressed MoodVisit 6- Second Intervention: Depressed MoodVisit 7- Second Intervention: Depressed MoodVisit 8- Second Intervention: Depressed MoodVisit 9- Second Intervention: Depressed MoodVisit 10- Second Intervention: Depressed MoodFollow-up: Depressed Mood SubscaleVisit 1- First Intervention: General AnxietyVisit 2- First Intervention: General AnxietyVisit 3- First Intervention: General AnxietyVisit 4- First Intervention: General AnxietyVisit 5- First Intervention: General AnxietyVisit 6- Second Intervention: General AnxietyVisit 7- Second Intervention: General AnxietyVisit 8- Second Intervention: General AnxietyVisit 9- Second Intervention: General AnxietyVisit 10- Second Intervention: General AnxietyFollow-up: General Anxiety SubscaleVisit 1- First Intervention: Obsessive CompulsiveVisit 2- First Intervention: Obsessive CompulsiveVisit 3- First Intervention: Obsessive CompulsiveVisit 4- First Intervention: Obsessive CompulsiveVisit 5- First Intervention: Obsessive CompulsiveVisit 6- Second Intervention: Obsessive CompulsiveVisit 7- Second Intervention: Obsessive CompulsiveVisit 8- Second Intervention: Obsessive CompulsiveVisit 9- Second Intervention: Obsessive CompulsiveVisit 10- First Intervention: Obsessive CompulsiveFollow-up: Obsessive Compulsive Behavior Subscale
Placebo First, Then rhIGF-18.007.007.007.007.008.006.506.006.005.005.002.004.003.002.002.002.003.002.003.002.002.008.006.006.005.005.006.006.006.004.004.005.504.004.004.003.003.003.003.003.003.002.003.50
rhIGF-1 First, Then Placebo7.007.006.005.004.006.005.005.004.004.505.004.005.003.003.004.004.003.003.002.003.003.506.007.006.005.005.007.005.004.003.004.004.003.004.004.003.003.003.003.003.002.002.503.00

Anxiety, Depression, and Mood Scale (ADAMS) - Social Avoidance Subscale

"The ADAMS is completed by the parent/caregiver/LAR and consists of 29 items which are scored on a 4-point rating scale that combines frequency and severity ratings. The instructions ask the rater to describe the individual's behavior over the last six months on the following scale: 0 if the behavior has not occurred, 1 if the behavior occurs occasionally or is a mild problem, 2 if the behavior occurs quite often or is moderate problem, or 3 if the behavior occurs a lot or is a severe problem.~The Social Avoidance subscale of the ADAMS will be used as a primary outcome measure for this trial. The range for this subscale is 0-21. The higher the subscale score, the more problematic the behavior." (NCT01777542)
Timeframe: Every 5 weeks during each of the two 20-week treatment periods, and once 4 weeks after final treatment ends

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Visit 1 - First InterventionVisit 2 - First InterventionVisit 3 - First InterventionVisit 4 - First InterventionVisit 5 - First InterventionVisit 6 - Second InterventionVisit 7 - Second InterventionVisit 8 - Second InterventionVisit 9 - Second InterventionVisit 10 - Second InterventionFollow-up
Placebo First, Then rhIGF-16.005.005.006.005.004.004.004.003.003.504.00
rhIGF-1 First, Then Placebo4.005.004.004.003.004.004.004.003.003.503.00

Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I)

"Each time the patient was seen after the study intervention was initiated, the clinician compared the patient's overall clinical condition to the CGI-S score obtained at the baseline (visit 1) visit. Based on information collected, the clinician determined if any improvement occurred on the following 7-point scale: 1=Very much improved since the initiation of treatment; 2=Much improved; 3=Minimally improved; 4=No change from baseline (the initiation of treatment); 5=Minimally worse; 6=Much worse; 7=Very much worse since the initiation of treatment.~The possible range for reported scores is 1-7." (NCT01777542)
Timeframe: Every 10 weeks during each of the two 20-week treatment periods

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Visit 3 - First InterventionVisit 5 - First InterventionVisit 6 - Second InterventionVisit 8 - Second InterventionVisit 10 - Second Intervention
Placebo First, Then rhIGF-14.004.004.004.004.00
rhIGF-1 First, Then Placebo4.004.004.004.004.00

Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S)

"This scale is used to judge the severity of the subject's disease prior to entry into the study. The clinician will rate the severity of behavioral symptoms at baseline on a 7-point scale from not impaired to the most impaired.~The scores that correspond to each possible grouping are as follows: 1=Normal, not at all impaired; 2=Borderline impaired; 3=Mildly impaired; 4=Moderately impaired; 5=Markedly impaired; 6=Severely impaired; 7=The most impaired.~The possible range for reported scores is 1-7." (NCT01777542)
Timeframe: Every 10 weeks during each of the two 20-week treatment periods

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Visit 1 - First InterventionVisit 3 - First InterventionVisit 5 - First InterventionVisit 6 - Second InterventionVisit 8 - Second InterventionVisit 10 - Second Intervention
Placebo First, Then rhIGF-14.004.004.004.004.004.00
rhIGF-1 First, Then Placebo4.004.004.004.004.004.50

Communication and Symbolic Behavior Scales - Developmental Profile (CSBS-DP)

"The CSBS-DP was designed to measure early communication and symbolic skills in infants and young children (that is, functional communication skills of 6 month to 2 year olds). The CSBS-DP measures skills from three composites: (a) Social (emotion, eye gaze, and communication); (b) Speech (sounds and words); and (c) Symbolic (understanding and object use) and asks about developmental milestones. The data reported are the composite scores for these three categories.~The possible scores for the three composite categories are as follows:~Social Composite = 0-48; Speech Composite = 0-40; Symbolic Composite = 0-51.~A higher score indicates more advanced abilities in that area." (NCT01777542)
Timeframe: Every 5 weeks during each of the two 20-week treatment periods, and once 4 weeks after final treatment ends

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Visit 1 - First Intervention: SocialVisit 2: Social Composite ScoreVisit 3: Social Composite ScoreVisit 4: Social Composite ScoreVisit 5: Social Composite ScoreVisit 6 - Second Intervention: SocialVisit 7 - Second Intervention: SocialVisit 8 - Second Intervention: SocialVisit 9 - Second Intervention: SocialVisit 10 - Second Intervention: SocialFollow-up: Social Composite ScoreVisit 1 - First Intervention: SpeechVisit 2 - First Intervention: SpeechVisit 3 - First Intervention: SpeechVisit 4 - First Intervention: SpeechVisit 5 - First Intervention: SpeechVisit 6 - Second Intervention: SpeechVisit 7 - Second Intervention: SpeechVisit 8 - Second Intervention: SpeechVisit 9 - Second Intervention: SpeechVisit 10 - Second Intervention: SpeechFollow-up: Speech Composite ScoreVisit 1 - First Intervention: SymbolicVisit 2 - First Intervention: SymbolicVisit 3 - First Intervention: SymbolicVisit 4 - First Intervention: SymbolicVisit 5 - First Intervention: SymbolicVisit 6 - Second Intervention: SymbolicVisit 7 - Second Intervention: SymbolicVisit 8 - Second Intervention: SymbolicVisit 9 - Second Intervention: SymbolicVisit 10 - Second Intervention: SymbolicFollow-up: Symbolic Composite Score
Placebo First, Then rhIGF-119.0020.0018.0018.0020.0018.0020.0021.0021.0022.5022.504.003.005.005.506.504.004.005.005.005.006.009.5010.5010.5012.0011.5013.0010.2511.5011.5013.7514.25
rhIGF-1 First, Then Placebo22.0024.0024.0024.0023.0028.0025.0027.0029.0027.0028.007.005.008.005.008.008.507.006.505.007.256.0014.0014.5015.0014.0016.5018.5017.0017.0018.0017.0018.00

Kerr Clinical Severity Scale

"The Kerr clinical severity scale (Kerr scale) is a quantitative measure of global disease severity. The Kerr scale is a summation of individual items related to Rett syndrome phenotypic characteristics. The items are based on the severity or degree of abnormality of each characteristic on a discrete scale (0, 1, 2) with the highest level corresponding to the most severe or most abnormal presentations.~The possible range of scores is 0-48. The higher the score, the more severe the symptoms." (NCT01777542)
Timeframe: At the start and end of each 20-week treatment period

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Visit 1 - First InterventionVisit 5 - First InterventionVisit 6 - Second InterventionVisit 10 - Second Intervention
Placebo First, Then rhIGF-116.5015.0015.0014.00
rhIGF-1 First, Then Placebo18.0018.0019.0020.00

Mullen Scales of Early Learning (MSEL)

"The MSEL is a standardized developmental test for children ages 3 to 68 months consisting of five subscales: gross motor, fine motor, visual reception, expressive language, and receptive language.~The raw score is reported for each subscale domain. The potential score ranges are as follows:~Visual Reception: 33 items, score range=0-50, Fine Motor: 30 items, score range= 0-49, Receptive Language: 33 items, score range= 0-48, Expressive Language: 28 items, score range= 0-50. The gross motor subscale was not included in this population.~A higher raw score indicates more advanced abilities in that section." (NCT01777542)
Timeframe: At the start and end of each 20-week treatment period

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Visit 1- First Intervention: Visual ReceptionVisit 5- First Intervention: Visual ReceptionVisit 6- Second Intervention: Visual ReceptionVisit 10: Visual Reception Raw ScoreVisit 1- First Intervention: Fine MotorVisit 5- First Intervention: Fine MotorVisit 6- Second Intervention: Fine MotorVisit 10- Second Intervention: Fine MotorVisit 1- First Intervention: Receptive LanguageVisit 5- First Intervention: Receptive LanguageVisit 6- Second Intervention: Receptive LanguageVisit 10- Second Intervention: Receptive LanguageVisit 1- First Intervention: Expressive LanguageVisit 5- First Intervention: Expressive LanguageVisit 6- Second Intervention: Expressive LanguageVisit 10- Second Intervention: Expressive Language
Placebo First, Then rhIGF-117.0026.0023.0028.0010.009.0011.009.0020.0030.0031.0031.008.009.006.008.00
rhIGF-1 First, Then Placebo26.0039.5042.0044.007.007.0010.008.5025.5032.0038.0036.509.008.0010.008.00

Parent Targeted Visual Analog Scale (PTSVAS) - Scale 1

"The parent or caretaker identifies the three most troublesome, RTT-specific, target symptoms, such as inattention or breath-holding. This allows the problems that are of concern to parents and the family to be targeted in the trial. In this study the caregiver will choose three target symptoms at baseline and then rate changes in severity of each target symptom on a visual analog scale (VAS).~The VAS is a 10 cm line, where a target symptom is anchored on one end with the description the best it has ever been and on the other with the description the worst it has ever been. The parent was asked to marked on the line where they felt their child's symptoms currently fit best. This mark was measured as recorded as a numeric value from 0.00-10.00 cm. The higher the value, the worse the symptom." (NCT01777542)
Timeframe: Every 5 weeks during each of the two 20-week treatment periods, and once 4 weeks after final treatment ends

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Visit 1 - First InterventionVisit 2 - First InterventionVisit 3 - First InterventionVisit 4 - First InterventionVisit 5 - First InterventionVisit 6 - Second InterventionVisit 7 - Second InterventionVisit 8 - Second InterventionVisit 9 - Second InterventionVisit 10 - Second InterventionFollow-up
Placebo First, Then rhIGF-16.504.705.655.054.804.954.555.654.154.805.60
rhIGF-1 First, Then Placebo8.804.805.355.105.155.204.655.005.155.055.08

Parent Targeted Visual Analog Scale (PTSVAS) - Scale 2

"The parent or caretaker identifies the three most troublesome, RTT-specific, target symptoms, such as inattention or breath-holding. This allows the problems that are of concern to parents and the family to be targeted in the trial. In this study the caregiver will choose three target symptoms at baseline and then rate changes in severity of each target symptom on a visual analog scale (VAS).~The VAS is a 10 cm line, where a target symptom is anchored on one end with the description the best it has ever been and on the other with the description the worst it has ever been. The parent was asked to marked on the line where they felt their child's symptoms currently fit best. This mark was measured as recorded as a numeric value from 0.00-10.00 cm. The higher the value, the worse the symptom." (NCT01777542)
Timeframe: Every 5 weeks during each of the two 20-week treatment periods, and once 4 weeks after final treatment ends

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Visit 1 - First InterventionVisit 2 - First InterventionVisit 3 - First InterventionVisit 4 - First InterventionVisit 5 - First InterventionVisit 6 - Second InterventionVisit 7 - Second InterventionVisit 8 - Second InterventionVisit 9 - Second InterventionVisit 10 - Second InterventionFollow-up
Placebo First, Then rhIGF-17.754.505.855.005.005.355.505.153.804.905.15
rhIGF-1 First, Then Placebo6.355.255.955.405.457.105.855.005.134.955.20

Parent Targeted Visual Analog Scale (PTSVAS) - Scale 3

"The parent or caretaker identifies the three most troublesome, RTT-specific, target symptoms, such as inattention or breath-holding. This allows the problems that are of concern to parents and the family to be targeted in the trial. In this study the caregiver will choose three target symptoms at baseline and then rate changes in severity of each target symptom on a visual analog scale (VAS).~The VAS is a 10 cm line, where a target symptom is anchored on one end with the description the best it has ever been and on the other with the description the worst it has ever been. The parent was asked to marked on the line where they felt their child's symptoms currently fit best. This mark was measured as recorded as a numeric value from 0.00-10.00 cm. The higher the value, the worse the symptom." (NCT01777542)
Timeframe: Every 5 weeks during each of the two 20-week treatment periods, and once 4 weeks after final treatment ends

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Visit 1 - First InterventionVisit 2 - First InterventionVisit 3 - First InterventionVisit 4 - First InterventionVisit 5 - First InterventionVisit 6 - Second InterventionVisit 7 - Second InterventionVisit 8 - Second InterventionVisit 9 - Second InterventionVisit 10 - Second InterventionFollow-up
Placebo First, Then rhIGF-17.854.705.654.155.006.204.804.854.604.134.55
rhIGF-1 First, Then Placebo5.705.005.205.355.105.354.955.155.254.555.10

Parental Global Impression - Improvement (PGI-I)

"As part of each visit after the study intervention was initiated, the parent/caregiver was asked to compare the patient's overall clinical condition to the score obtained at the baseline (visit 1) visit. Based on information collected, the clinician determined if any improvement occurred on the following 7-point scale: 1=Very much improved since the initiation of treatment; 2=Much improved; 3=Minimally improved; 4=No change from baseline (the initiation of treatment); 5=Minimally worse; 6=Much worse; 7=Very much worse since the initiation of treatment.~The possible range for reported scores is 1-7." (NCT01777542)
Timeframe: Every 5 weeks during each of the two 20-week treatment periods, and once 4 weeks after final treatment ends

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Visit 2 - First InterventionVisit 3 - First InterventionVisit 4 - First InterventionVisit 5 - First InterventionVisit 6 - Second InterventionVisit 7 - Second InterventionVisit 8 - Second InterventionVisit 9 - Second InterventionVisit 10 - Second InterventionFollow-up
Placebo First, Then rhIGF-14.003.003.003.004.003.003.003.003.003.00
rhIGF-1 First, Then Placebo4.004.004.003.003.003.003.003.003.003.00

Parental Global Impression - Severity (PGI-S)

"The PGI-S is the parent version of the CGI-S. Parents/caregivers/LAR are asked to rate the severity of their child's symptoms at baseline on a 7-point scale from not at all impaired to the most impaired. The parents/caregivers/LAR will complete the PGI-S at each study visit.~The scores that correspond to each possible grouping are as follows:~1=Normal, not at all impaired; 2=Borderline impaired; 3=Mildly impaired; 4=Moderately impaired; 5=Markedly impaired; 6=Severely impaired; 7=The most impaired.~The possible range for reported scores is 1-7." (NCT01777542)
Timeframe: Every 5 weeks during each of the two 20-week treatment periods, and once 4 weeks after final treatment ends

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Visit 1 - First InterventionVisit 2 - First InterventionVisit 3 - First InterventionVisit 4 - First InterventionVisit 5 - First InterventionVisit 6 - Second InterventionVisit 7 - Second InterventionVisit 8 - Second InterventionVisit 9 - Second InterventionVisit 10 - Second InterventionFollow-up
Placebo First, Then rhIGF-14.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.00
rhIGF-1 First, Then Placebo6.004.004.004.004.004.004.006.006.005.004.00

Quantitative Measures of Respiration: Apnea Index

"Respiratory data was collected using non-invasive respiratory inductance plethysmography from a BioCapture® recording device. BioCapture® is a child-friendly measurement device that can record from 1 to 12 physiological signal transducers in a time-locked manner. It can be configured with the pediatric chest and abdominal plethysmography bands and the 3 lead ECG signals we plan to use for monitoring cardiac safety throughout the study. Each transducer is placed on the patient independently to provide a customized fit that yields the highest signal quality for each patient irrespective of body shape and proportion. The transducer signals captured by the BioCapture® are transmitted wirelessly to a laptop computer where all signals are displayed in real-time.~The apnea index is given as apneas/hour. Data on apneas greater than or equal to 10 seconds are displayed below. The higher the frequency of apnea, the more severe the breathing abnormality." (NCT01777542)
Timeframe: Every 10 weeks during each of the two 20-week treatment periods

,
InterventionApneas/Hour (Median)
Visit 1 - First Intervention: Apnea IndexVisit 3 - First Intervention: Apnea IndexVisit 5 - First Intervention: Apnea IndexVisit 6 - Second Intervention: Apnea IndexVisit 8 - Second Intervention: Apnea IndexVisit 10 - Second Intervention: Apnea Index
Placebo First, Then rhIGF-17.584.806.937.907.288.91
rhIGF-1 First, Then Placebo4.053.483.073.625.555.56

Rett Syndrome Behavior Questionnaire (RSBQ)

"The RSBQ is a parent-completed measure of abnormal behaviors typically observed in individuals with RTT. Each item, grouped into eight subscales, is scored on a Likert scale of 0-2, according to how well the item describes the individual's behavior. A score of 0 indicates the described item is not true, a score of 1 indicates the described item is somewhat or sometimes true, and a score of 2 indicates the described item is very true or often true.~The total sum of each subscale is reported. The higher the score, the more severe the symptoms of that subscale in the participant.~The range for each subscale is as follows:~General Mood: 0-16 Body rocking and expressionless face: 0-14 Hand behaviors: 0-12 Breathing Problems: 0-10 Repetitive Face Movements: 0-8 Night-time behaviors: 0-6 Walking Standing: 0-4~The fear/anxiety subscale was used as a primary outcome measure in this study and results can be found in that section." (NCT01777542)
Timeframe: Every 5 weeks during each of the two 20-week treatment periods, and once 4 weeks after final treatment ends

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Visit 1- First Intervention: General MoodVisit 2- First Intervention: General MoodVisit 3- First Intervention: General MoodVisit 4- First Intervention: General MoodVisit 5- First Intervention: General MoodVisit 6- Second Intervention: General MoodVisit 7- Second Intervention: General MoodVisit 8- Second Intervention: General MoodVisit 9- Second Intervention: General MoodVisit 10- Second Intervention: General MoodFollow-up: General MoodVisit 1- First Intervention: Body RockingVisit 2- First Intervention: Body RockingVisit 3- First Intervention: Body RockingVisit 4- First Intervention: Body RockingVisit 5- First Intervention: Body RockingVisit 6- Second Intervention: Body RockingVisit 7- Second Intervention: Body RockingVisit 8- Second Intervention: Body RockingVisit 9- Second Intervention: Body RockingVisit 10- Second Intervention: Body RockingFollowup: Body RockingVisit 1- First Intervention: Hand BehaviorsVisit 2- First Intervention: Hand BehaviorsVisit 3- First Intervention: Hand BehaviorsVisit 4- First Intervention: Hand BehaviorsVisit 5- First Intervention: Hand BehaviorsVisit 6- Second Intervention: Hand BehaviorsVisit 7- Second Intervention: Hand BehaviorsVisit 8- Second Intervention: Hand BehaviorsVisit 9- Second Intervention: Hand BehaviorsVisit 10- Second Intervention: Hand BehaviorsFollow-up: Hand BehaviorsVisit 1- First Intervention: Breathing ProblemsVisit 2- First Intervention: Breathing ProblemsVisit 3- First Intervention: Breathing ProblemsVisit 4- First Intervention: Breathing ProblemsVisit 5- First Intervention: Breathing ProblemsVisit 6- Second Intervention: Breathing ProblemsVisit 7- Second Intervention: Breathing ProblemsVisit 8- Second Intervention: Breathing ProblemsVisit 9- Second Intervention: Breathing ProblemsVisit 10- Second Intervention: Breathing ProblemsFollow-up: Breathing ProblemsVisit 1- First Intervention: Repetitive Face MovemVisit 2- First Intervention: Repetitive Face MovemVisit 3- First Intervention: Repetitive Face MovemVisit 4- First Intervention: Repetitive Face MovemVisit 5- First Intervention: Repetitive Face MovemVisit 6- Second Intervention: Repetitive Face MovVisit 7- Second Intervention: Repetitive Face MovVisit 8- Second Intervention: Repetitive Face MovVisit 9- Second Intervention: Repetitive Face MovVisit 10- Second Intervention: Repetitive Face MovFollow-up: Repetitive Face MovementsVisit 1- First Intervention: Night time BehaviorsVisit 2- First Intervention: Night time BehaviorsVisit 3- First Intervention: Night time BehaviorsVisit 4- First Intervention: Night time BehaviorsVisit 5- First Intervention: Night time BehaviorsVisit 6- Second Intervention: Night time BehaviorVisit 7- Second Intervention: Night time BehaviorVisit 8- Second Intervention: Night time BehaviorVisit 9- Second Intervention: Night time BehaviorVisit 10- Second Intervention: Night time BehaviorFollow-up: Night time BehaviorsVisit 1- First Intervention: Walking/StandingVisit 2- First Intervention: Walking/StandingVisit 3- First Intervention: Walking/StandingVisit 4- First Intervention: Walking/StandingVisit 5- First Intervention: Walking/StandingVisit 6- Second Intervention: Walking/StandingVisit 7- Second Intervention: Walking/StandingVisit 8- Second Intervention: Walking/StandingVisit 9- Second Intervention: Walking/StandingVisit 10- Second Intervention: Walking/StandingFollow-up: Walking/Standing
Placebo First, Then rhIGF-17.005.006.005.005.004.005.505.006.004.005.506.005.005.006.005.004.005.005.004.005.004.508.009.008.008.008.009.008.008.008.007.007.506.004.005.005.005.006.004.506.005.006.005.002.002.003.002.003.003.003.003.003.003.002.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.001.000.000.000.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.003.001.502.00
rhIGF-1 First, Then Placebo4.003.002.002.003.004.002.002.001.002.502.004.004.003.004.004.004.003.004.003.004.004.008.008.008.009.009.008.009.009.007.009.008.504.004.004.005.004.004.003.003.003.004.003.002.002.003.002.002.003.002.002.002.001.502.001.001.000.000.001.001.000.000.000.000.000.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00

Rett Syndrome Behavior Questionnaire (RSBQ) - Fear/Anxiety Subscale

"The RSBQ is an informant/parent-completed measure of abnormal behaviors typically observed in individuals with RTT, which is completed by a parent/caregiver/LAR. Each item, grouped into eight domains/factors: General mood, Breathing problems, Body rocking and expressionless face, Hand behaviors, Repetitive face movements, Night-time behaviors, Fear/anxiety and Walking/standing), is scored on a Likert scale of 0-2, according to how well the item describes the individual's behavior. A score of 0 indicates the described item is not true, a score of 1 indicates the described item is somewhat or sometimes true, and a score of 2 indicates the described item is very true or often true.~The total sum of items in each subscale is reported.~For the fear/anxiety subscale, the sum total could be between 0-8. The higher the sum total score, the greater the frequency of fear/anxiety behaviors." (NCT01777542)
Timeframe: Every 5 weeks during each of the two 20-week treatment periods, and once 4 weeks after final treatment ends

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Visit 1 - First InterventionVisit 2 - First InterventionVisit 3 - First InterventionVisit 4 - First InterventionVisit 5 - First InterventionVisit 6 - Second InterventionVisit 7 - Second InterventionVisit 8 - Second InterventionVisit 9 - Second InterventionVisit 10 - Second InterventionFollow-up
Placebo First, Then rhIGF-14.005.004.004.003.004.004.003.003.004.003.50
rhIGF-1 First, Then Placebo5.003.003.003.003.004.003.004.003.003.003.50

Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Second Edition (VABS-II)

"The VABS-II is a survey designed to assess personal and social functioning. Within each domain (Communication, Daily Living Skills, Socialization, and Motor Skills), items can given a score of 2 if the participant successfully performs the activity usually; a 1 if the participant successfully performs the activity sometimes, or needs reminders; a 0 if the participant never performs the activity, and a DK if the parent/caregiver is unsure of the participant's ability for an item.~The raw scores in each sub-domain are reported and the ranges for these are as follows: [Communication Domain], Receptive Language=0-40, Expressive Language=0-108, Written Language=0-50; [Daily Living Skills Domain], Personal=0-82, Domestic=0-48, Community=0-88; [Socialization Domain], Interpersonal Relationships=0-76, Play and Leisure Time=0-62, Coping Skills=0-60; [Motor Skills Domain]: Gross Motor Skills=0-80, Fine Motor Skills=0-72.~A higher score indicates more advanced abilities." (NCT01777542)
Timeframe: At the start and end of each 20-week treatment period

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Visit 1 - First Intervention: ReceptiveVisit 5 - First Intervention: ReceptiveVisit 6 - Second Intervention: Receptive LanguageVisit 10 - Second Intervention: Receptive LanguageVisit 1 - First Intervention: ExpressiveVisit 5 - First Intervention: ExpressiveVisit 6 - Second Intervention: Expressive Lang.Visit 10 - Second Intervention: Expressive Lang.Visit 1 - First Intervention: WrittenVisit 5 - First Intervention: WrittenVisit 6: - Second Intervention Written LanguageVisit 10 - Second Intervention: Written LanguageVisit 1 - First Intervention: PersonalVisit 5 - First Intervention: PersonalVisit 6 - Second Intervention: PersonalVisit 10 - Second Intervention: PersonalVisit 1 - First Intervention: DomesticVisit 5 - First Intervention: DomesticVisit 6 - Second Intervention: DomesticVisit 10 - Second Intervention: DomesticVisit 1 - First Intervention: CommunityVisit 5 - First Intervention: CommunityVisit 6 - Second Intervention: CommunityVisit 10 - Second Intervention: CommunityVisit 1 - First Intervention: Interpersonal Rel.Visit 5 - First Intervention: Interpersonal Rel.Visit 6 - Second Intervention: Interpersonal Rel.Visit 10 - Second Intervention: Interpersonal Rel.Visit 1 - First Intervention: Play and LeisureVisit 5 - First Intervention: Play and LeisureVisit 6 - Second Intervention: Play and LeisureVisit 10 - Second Intervention: Play and LeisureVisit 1 - First Intervention: Coping SkillsVisit 5 - First Intervention: Coping SkillsVisit 6 - Second Intervention: Coping SkillsVisit 10 - Second Intervention: Coping SkillsVisit 1 - First Intervention: Gross MotorVisit 5 - First Intervention: Gross MotorVisit 6 - Second Intervention: Gross MotorVisit 10 - Second Intervention: Gross MotorVisit 1 - First Intervention: Fine MotorVisit 5 - First Intervention: Fine MotorVisit 6 - Second Intervention: Fine MotorVisit 10 - Second Intervention: Fine Motor
Placebo First, Then rhIGF-113.0015.0018.0020.0016.0017.0018.0020.000.000.004.006.009.0010.009.0010.000.000.000.000.000.001.001.002.0018.0018.0019.0020.008.0011.0012.0011.003.002.003.004.0031.0034.0027.0027.006.006.007.005.00
rhIGF-1 First, Then Placebo18.0021.0022.0024.5018.0022.0025.0024.004.005.007.007.008.009.008.509.500.000.000.000.003.003.005.005.0021.0022.0021.0022.5013.0012.0013.0012.503.004.006.004.5010.0010.0011.5010.502.003.004.004.00

Reviews

61 reviews available for amphetamine and ADDH

ArticleYear
NLS-3 (Levophacetoperane or (
    Current medicinal chemistry, 2024, Volume: 31, Issue:9

    Topics: Adolescent; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimu

2024
Do ADHD Treatments Improve Executive Behavior Beyond Core ADHD Symptoms in Adults? Evidence From Systematic Analysis of Clinical Trials.
    Journal of clinical pharmacology, 2023, Volume: 63, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Amphetamine; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Centra

2023
Polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children and adolescents.
    The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2023, 04-14, Volume: 4

    Topics: Adolescent; Amphetamine; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; C

2023
Pharmacologic treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in adults: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
    PloS one, 2020, Volume: 15, Issue:10

    Topics: Adult; Amphetamine; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Bayes

2020
Brief history of the medical and non-medical use of amphetamine-like psychostimulants.
    Experimental neurology, 2021, Volume: 342

    Topics: Altitude Sickness; Amphetamine; Animals; Armed Conflicts; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactiv

2021
Safety of Treatments for ADHD in Adults: Pairwise and Network Meta-Analyses.
    Journal of attention disorders, 2019, Volume: 23, Issue:2

    Topics: Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors; Adult; Amphetamine; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Attention Deficit Disor

2019
Risk of Irritability With Psychostimulant Treatment in Children With ADHD: A Meta-Analysis.
    The Journal of clinical psychiatry, 2017, Volume: 78, Issue:6

    Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child

2017
The pharmacology of amphetamine and methylphenidate: Relevance to the neurobiology of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and other psychiatric comorbidities.
    Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews, 2018, Volume: 87

    Topics: Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors; Amphetamine; Animals; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; B

2018
Efficacy, Acceptability, and Tolerability of Lisdexamfetamine, Mixed Amphetamine Salts, Methylphenidate, and Modafinil in the Treatment of Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    The Annals of pharmacotherapy, 2019, Volume: 53, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants

2019
New Formulations of Stimulants: An Update for Clinicians.
    Journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology, 2019, Volume: 29, Issue:5

    Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child

2019
Amphetamine, past and present--a pharmacological and clinical perspective.
    Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England), 2013, Volume: 27, Issue:6

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Amphetamine; Amphetamine-Related Disorders; Animals; Attention Deficit Disorder w

2013
Is the treatment with psychostimulants in children and adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder harmful for the dopaminergic system?
    Attention deficit and hyperactivity disorders, 2013, Volume: 5, Issue:2

    Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Brain; Central Nervous System S

2013
Effect of psychostimulants on brain structure and function in ADHD: a qualitative literature review of magnetic resonance imaging-based neuroimaging studies.
    The Journal of clinical psychiatry, 2013, Volume: 74, Issue:9

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Brain; Central Nervou

2013
Genetic targeting of the amphetamine and methylphenidate-sensitive dopamine transporter: on the path to an animal model of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.
    Neurochemistry international, 2014, Volume: 73

    Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulan

2014
Meta-Analysis: Risk of Tics Associated With Psychostimulant Use in Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trials.
    Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 2015, Volume: 54, Issue:9

    Topics: Adolescent; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimu

2015
Racemic amphetamine sulfate (Evekeo) for ADHD.
    The Medical letter on drugs and therapeutics, 2015, Sep-28, Volume: 57, Issue:1478

    Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Anorexia; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Child; Humans; Random

2015
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate: Prodrug Delivery, Amphetamine Exposure and Duration of Efficacy.
    Clinical drug investigation, 2016, Volume: 36, Issue:5

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity;

2016
To meta-analyze or not to meta-analyze? A combined meta-analysis of N-of-1 trial data with RCT data on amphetamines and methylphenidate for pediatric ADHD.
    Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2016, Volume: 76

    Topics: Adolescent; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Biomedical Research; Child;

2016
N-of-1 trials can be aggregated to generate group mean treatment effects: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2016, Volume: 76

    Topics: Adolescent; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Child; Child, Preschool; Fem

2016
Safety and efficacy considerations due to misuse of extended-release formulations of stimulant medications.
    Postgraduate medicine, 2016, Volume: 128, Issue:7

    Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Dosag

2016
Effect of stimulants on height and weight: a review of the literature.
    Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 2008, Volume: 47, Issue:9

    Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Body Height; Body Weight; Central Nervou

2008
Potential adverse effects of amphetamine treatment on brain and behavior: a review.
    Molecular psychiatry, 2009, Volume: 14, Issue:2

    Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Behavior; Brain; Central Nervou

2009
Evolution of stimulants to treat ADHD: transdermal methylphenidate.
    Human psychopharmacology, 2009, Volume: 24, Issue:1

    Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervo

2009
Amfetamine for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in people with intellectual disabilities.
    The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2009, Jan-21, Issue:1

    Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child

2009
Attention-deficit-hyperactivity disorder: an update.
    Pharmacotherapy, 2009, Volume: 29, Issue:6

    Topics: Adolescent; Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors; Adult; Amphetamine; Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generati

2009
The neuropharmacology of ADHD drugs in vivo: insights on efficacy and safety.
    Neuropharmacology, 2009, Volume: 57, Issue:7-8

    Topics: Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors; Amphetamine; Animals; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Attention Deficit Dis

2009
Safety of stimulant treatment in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: Part I.
    Expert opinion on drug safety, 2009, Volume: 8, Issue:6

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous Syste

2009
The reverse operation of Na(+)/Cl(-)-coupled neurotransmitter transporters--why amphetamines take two to tango.
    Journal of neurochemistry, 2010, Volume: 112, Issue:2

    Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulan

2010
Progress and promise of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder pharmacogenetics.
    CNS drugs, 2010, Volume: 24, Issue:2

    Topics: Amphetamine; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Catechol O-Me

2010
What are the cognitive effects of stimulant medications? Emphasis on adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).
    Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews, 2010, Volume: 34, Issue:8

    Topics: Achievement; Adult; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous Syst

2010
Understanding the effects of stimulant medications on cognition in individuals with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: a decade of progress.
    Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2011, Volume: 36, Issue:1

    Topics: Amphetamine; Attention; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimul

2011
Cognitive enhancers for the treatment of ADHD.
    Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior, 2011, Volume: 99, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Amphetamine; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Child;

2011
Revisiting clonidine: an innovative add-on option for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
    Drugs of today (Barcelona, Spain : 1998), 2012, Volume: 48, Issue:3

    Topics: Adolescent; Adrenergic alpha-Agonists; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; B

2012
Amfetamine and methylphenidate medications for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: complementary treatment options.
    European child & adolescent psychiatry, 2012, Volume: 21, Issue:9

    Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child

2012
Long-term efficacy and safety of treatment with stimulants and atomoxetine in adult ADHD: a review of controlled and naturalistic studies.
    European neuropsychopharmacology : the journal of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2013, Volume: 23, Issue:6

    Topics: Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors; Adult; Amphetamine; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Attention Deficit Disor

2013
New medications for treatment of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: review and commentary.
    Pediatric annals, 2002, Volume: 31, Issue:8

    Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child

2002
Novel treatments for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children.
    The Journal of clinical psychiatry, 2002, Volume: 63 Suppl 12

    Topics: Adolescent; Age Factors; Amphetamine; Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic; Antihypertensive Agents; Ato

2002
Experimental investigations on dopamine transmission can provide clues on the mechanism of the therapeutic effect of amphetamine and methylphenidate in ADHD.
    Neural plasticity, 2004, Volume: 11, Issue:1-2

    Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Disease Models, Animal; Dopamin

2004
Recognizing and managing bipolar disorder in children.
    The Journal of clinical psychiatry, 2005, Volume: 66 Suppl 1

    Topics: Adolescent; Age Factors; Amphetamine; Anticonvulsants; Antipsychotic Agents; Attention Deficit Disor

2005
Pharmacotherapy of adult ADHD.
    Journal of clinical psychology, 2005, Volume: 61, Issue:5

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Age Factors; Amphetamine; Antidepressive Agents; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Atten

2005
Righting a troubled course. Diagnosing and treating ADHD in adults.
    Advance for nurse practitioners, 2005, Volume: 13, Issue:8

    Topics: Adult; Age Factors; Amphetamine; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperact

2005
NTP-CERHR monograph on the potential human reproductive and developmental effects of amphetamines.
    NTP CERHR MON, 2005, Issue:16

    Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Behavior, Animal; Central Nervo

2005
Regulated expression and function of the somatodendritic catecholamine neurotransmitter transporters.
    Journal of pharmacological sciences, 2005, Volume: 99, Issue:2

    Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Catecholamines; Central Nervous

2005
Update on amphetamine neurotoxicity and its relevance to the treatment of ADHD.
    Journal of attention disorders, 2007, Volume: 11, Issue:1

    Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Brain; Central Nervous System S

2007
The consequences of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in adults.
    Journal of psychiatric practice, 2007, Volume: 13, Issue:5

    Topics: Achievement; Adult; Age Factors; Amphetamine; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Attention Deficit Disorder

2007
ADHD, substance use disorders, and psychostimulant treatment: current literature and treatment guidelines.
    Journal of attention disorders, 2008, Volume: 12, Issue:2

    Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child

2008
New perspectives from microdialysis studies in freely-moving, spontaneously hypertensive rats on the pharmacology of drugs for the treatment of ADHD.
    Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior, 2008, Volume: 90, Issue:2

    Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Dise

2008
Current concepts of abnormal motor disorder: an experimental model of attentional deficit disorder.
    The West Indian medical journal, 1981, Volume: 30, Issue:3

    Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Antipsychotic Agents; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Avoidance

1981
Animal models related to developmental disorders: theoretical and pharmacological analyses.
    Applied research in mental retardation, 1981, Volume: 2, Issue:1

    Topics: 5,7-Dihydroxytryptamine; Amphetamine; Animals; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Brain;

1981
Anti-hyperactivity medication: methylphenidate and amphetamine.
    Molecular psychiatry, 1998, Volume: 3, Issue:5

    Topics: Adult; Amino Acid Sequence; Amphetamine; Animals; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Cen

1998
[Hyperkinetic syndrome in childhood and adolescence. Diagnosis and therapy].
    Medizinische Monatsschrift fur Pharmazeuten, 1991, Volume: 14, Issue:5

    Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Child; Combined Modality Therapy; Humans

1991
Adolescent outcome of hyperactive children treated with stimulants in childhood: a review.
    Psychopharmacology bulletin, 1985, Volume: 21, Issue:2

    Topics: Achievement; Adolescent; Amphetamine; Antisocial Personality Disorder; Attention Deficit Disorder wi

1985
Prevalence and efficacy of stimulant drug use with mentally retarded children and youth.
    Psychopharmacology bulletin, 1985, Volume: 21, Issue:2

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous

1985
Treating problem children with stimulant drugs.
    The New England journal of medicine, 1973, Aug-23, Volume: 289, Issue:8

    Topics: Adult; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants

1973
Drug therapy in minimal brain dysfunction: a commentary.
    The Journal of pediatrics, 1972, Volume: 81, Issue:2

    Topics: Amphetamine; Anticonvulsants; Antidepressive Agents; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity;

1972
Some speculations concerning a possible biochemical basis of minimal brain dysfunction.
    Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1973, Feb-28, Volume: 205

    Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Arousal; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Avoidance Learning; Br

1973
How amphetamine acts in minimal brain dysfunction.
    Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1973, Feb-28, Volume: 205

    Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Behavior, Animal; Brain; Brain

1973
Genetic approaches to the syndrome of minimal brain dysfunction.
    Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1973, Feb-28, Volume: 205

    Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Child; Dextroamphetamine; Diseases in Tw

1973
Minimal brain dysfunction in children. Diagnosis and management.
    Pediatric clinics of North America, 1973, Volume: 20, Issue:1

    Topics: Abnormalities, Multiple; Affective Symptoms; Age Factors; Amphetamine; Attention; Attention Deficit

1973
Some speculations concerning a possible biochemical basis of minimal brain dysfunction.
    Life sciences, 1974, May-01, Volume: 14, Issue:9

    Topics: Acute Disease; Amphetamine; Animals; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Behavior; Behavi

1974
Biogenic amines and psychiatry.
    The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry, 1971, Volume: 5, Issue:1

    Topics: 5-Hydroxytryptophan; Affective Symptoms; Amines; Amphetamine; Anxiety Disorders; Attention Deficit D

1971

Trials

41 trials available for amphetamine and ADDH

ArticleYear
Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of SHP465 Mixed Amphetamine Salts After Administration of Multiple Daily Doses in Children Aged 4-5 Years with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.
    CNS drugs, 2022, Volume: 36, Issue:1

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Amphetamine; Area Under Curve; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity;

2022
Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Fixed-Dose Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Amphetamine Extended-Release Tablets in Adults With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.
    The Journal of clinical psychiatry, 2022, 07-20, Volume: 83, Issue:5

    Topics: Adult; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants

2022
Improved Executive Function in Adults Diagnosed With Attention-Deficit/ Hyperactivity Disorder as Measured by the Brown Attention-Deficit Disorder Scale Following Treatment With SHP465 Mixed Amphetamine Salts Extended-Release: Post Hoc Analyses From 2 Ran
    Journal of attention disorders, 2022, Volume: 26, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Amphetamine; Attention; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System

2022
Assessing Palatability of a New Amphetamine Extended-Release Tablet Formulation for the Treatment of ADHD.
    Drug design, development and therapy, 2021, Volume: 15

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Ner

2021
A Long-Term, Open-Label, Safety Study of Triple-Bead Mixed Amphetamine Salts (SHP465) in Adults With ADHD.
    Journal of attention disorders, 2020, Volume: 24, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants

2020
Triple-Bead Mixed Amphetamine Salts (SHP465) in Adults With ADHD: Results of a Phase 3, Double-Blind, Randomized, Forced-Dose Trial.
    Journal of attention disorders, 2020, Volume: 24, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants

2020
Efficacy and Safety of SHP465 Mixed Amphetamine Salts in the Treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Adults: Results of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Forced-Dose Clinical Study.
    CNS drugs, 2017, Volume: 31, Issue:8

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous Syste

2017
A Randomized Phase I Study to Assess the Effect of Alcohol on the Pharmacokinetics of an Extended-release Orally Disintegrating Tablet Formulation of Amphetamine in Healthy Adults.
    Clinical therapeutics, 2017, Volume: 39, Issue:8

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Ner

2017
A Single-Dose, Two-Way Crossover, Open-Label Bioequivalence Study of an Amphetamine Extended-Release Oral Suspension in Healthy Adults.
    Journal of attention disorders, 2020, Volume: 24, Issue:3

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Cross-Over

2020
Efficacy and Safety of Amphetamine Extended-Release Oral Suspension in Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.
    Journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology, 2018, Volume: 28, Issue:5

    Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child

2018
Early-Onset Efficacy and Safety Pilot Study of Amphetamine Extended-Release Oral Suspension in the Treatment of Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.
    Journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology, 2019, Volume: 29, Issue:1

    Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child

2019
A randomized, double-blind, 3-way crossover, analog classroom study of SHP465 mixed amphetamine salts extended-release in adolescents with ADHD.
    Postgraduate medicine, 2019, Volume: 131, Issue:3

    Topics: Adolescent; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimu

2019
Single-Dose Pharmacokinetics of Amphetamine Extended-Release Oral Suspension in Healthy Adults.
    Journal of attention disorders, 2021, Volume: 25, Issue:6

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Biological

2021
Post-Hoc Analyses of the Effects of Baseline Sleep Quality on SHP465 Mixed Amphetamine Salts Extended-Release Treatment Response in Adults with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.
    CNS drugs, 2019, Volume: 33, Issue:7

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous Syste

2019
Morning and Evening Effects of Guanfacine Extended Release Adjunctive to Psychostimulants in Pediatric ADHD.
    Journal of attention disorders, 2017, Volume: 21, Issue:2

    Topics: Adolescent; Adrenergic alpha-2 Receptor Agonists; Amphetamine; Analysis of Variance; Attention Defic

2017
The Efficacy and Safety of Evekeo, Racemic Amphetamine Sulfate, for Treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Symptoms: A Multicenter, Dose-Optimized, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Crossover Laboratory Classroom Study.
    Journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology, 2015, Volume: 25, Issue:5

    Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child

2015
A randomized crossover study to assess the pharmacokinetics of a novel amphetamine extended-release orally disintegrating tablet in healthy adults.
    Postgraduate medicine, 2016, Volume: 128, Issue:7

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Amphetamine; Area Under Curve; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperact

2016
Mixed-amphetamine salts increase abstinence from marijuana in patients with co-occurring attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and cocaine dependence.
    The American journal on addictions, 2016, Volume: 25, Issue:8

    Topics: Adult; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants

2016
Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder-specific quality of life with triple-bead mixed amphetamine salts (SPD465) in adults: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
    The Journal of clinical psychiatry, 2008, Volume: 69, Issue:11

    Topics: Adult; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants

2008
Safety and effectiveness of coadministration of guanfacine extended release and psychostimulants in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
    Journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology, 2009, Volume: 19, Issue:5

    Topics: Adolescent; Adrenergic alpha-Agonists; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; C

2009
Clonidine extended-release tablets as add-on therapy to psychostimulants in children and adolescents with ADHD.
    Pediatrics, 2011, Volume: 127, Issue:6

    Topics: Adolescent; Adolescent Behavior; Adrenergic alpha-2 Receptor Agonists; Amphetamine; Attention Defici

2011
Medication adherence and symptom reduction in adults treated with mixed amphetamine salts in a randomized crossover study.
    Postgraduate medicine, 2011, Volume: 123, Issue:5

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous Syste

2011
Stimulant treatment of adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
    The Psychiatric clinics of North America, 2004, Volume: 27, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants

2004
Pharmacotherapy of adult ADHD.
    Journal of clinical psychology, 2005, Volume: 61, Issue:5

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Age Factors; Amphetamine; Antidepressive Agents; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Atten

2005
Effect of stimulants on 24-h ambulatory blood pressure in children with ADHD: a double-blind, randomized, cross-over trial.
    Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2006, Volume: 21, Issue:1

    Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Blood Pressure; Blood Pressure Monitorin

2006
Assessing medication effects in the MTA study using neuropsychological outcomes.
    Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines, 2006, Volume: 47, Issue:5

    Topics: Amphetamine; Analysis of Variance; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous Sy

2006
Assessing medication effects in the MTA study using neuropsychological outcomes.
    Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines, 2006, Volume: 47, Issue:5

    Topics: Amphetamine; Analysis of Variance; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous Sy

2006
Assessing medication effects in the MTA study using neuropsychological outcomes.
    Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines, 2006, Volume: 47, Issue:5

    Topics: Amphetamine; Analysis of Variance; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous Sy

2006
Assessing medication effects in the MTA study using neuropsychological outcomes.
    Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines, 2006, Volume: 47, Issue:5

    Topics: Amphetamine; Analysis of Variance; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous Sy

2006
Relative benefits of stimulant therapy with OROS methylphenidate versus mixed amphetamine salts extended release in improving the driving performance of adolescent drivers with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
    Pediatrics, 2006, Volume: 118, Issue:3

    Topics: Accidents, Traffic; Adolescent; Adult; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; A

2006
Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate and mixed amphetamine salts extended-release in children with ADHD: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover analog classroom study.
    Biological psychiatry, 2007, Nov-01, Volume: 62, Issue:9

    Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child

2007
Transition from methylphenidate or amphetamine to atomoxetine in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder--a preliminary tolerability and efficacy study.
    Clinical therapeutics, 2007, Volume: 29, Issue:6

    Topics: Adolescent; Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors; Amphetamine; Analysis of Variance; Atomoxetine Hydrochlori

2007
Medications do not necessarily normalize cognition in ADHD patients.
    Journal of attention disorders, 2008, Volume: 11, Issue:4

    Topics: Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors; Amphetamine; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Attention Deficit Disorder wit

2008
Rebound effects with long-acting amphetamine or methylphenidate stimulant medication preparations among adolescent male drivers with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
    Journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology, 2008, Volume: 18, Issue:1

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Automobile Driving; C

2008
Long-term, open-label safety and efficacy of atomoxetine in adults with ADHD: final report of a 4-year study.
    Journal of attention disorders, 2008, Volume: 12, Issue:3

    Topics: Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors; Adult; Amphetamine; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Attention Deficit Disor

2008
Computer analyzed EEG in amphetamine-responsive hyperactive children.
    Psychiatry research, 1981, Volume: 4, Issue:2

    Topics: Adolescent; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Child; Computers; Dextroamph

1981
Long-term stimulant treatment of children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder symptoms. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
    Archives of general psychiatry, 1997, Volume: 54, Issue:9

    Topics: Abdominal Pain; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Bipolar Disorder; Centra

1997
Evaluation of individual subjects in the analog classroom setting: II. Effects of dose of amphetamine (Adderall).
    Psychopharmacology bulletin, 1998, Volume: 34, Issue:4

    Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child

1998
Differential effect of amphetamine optical isomers on Bender Gestalt performance of the minimally brain dysfunctioned.
    Journal of learning disabilities, 1978, Volume: 11, Issue:3

    Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Bender-Gestalt Test; Child; Child, Presc

1978
Levoamphetamine vs dextroamphetamine in minimal brain dysfunction. Replication, time response, and differential effect by diagnostic group and family rating.
    Archives of general psychiatry, 1976, Volume: 33, Issue:3

    Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Child; Clin

1976
Caffeine versus methylphenidate and d-amphetamine in minimal brain dysfunction: a double-blind comparison.
    The American journal of psychiatry, 1975, Volume: 132, Issue:8

    Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Caffeine; Child; Child, Preschool; Clini

1975
A comparison of dextro-amphetamine and racemic-amphetamine in the treatment of the hyperkinetic syndrome or minimal brain dysfunction.
    Diseases of the nervous system, 1976, Volume: 37, Issue:1

    Topics: Adolescent; Age Factors; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Child; Child, P

1976
Fenfluramine treatment of childhood attention deficit disorder with hyperactivity: a preliminary report.
    Psychopharmacology bulletin, 1986, Volume: 22, Issue:1

    Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Child; Clinical Trials as Topic; Double-

1986
Levoamphetamine and dextroamphetamine: differential effect on aggression and hyperkinesis in children and dogs.
    The American journal of psychiatry, 1973, Volume: 130, Issue:2

    Topics: Aggression; Amphetamine; Animals; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Behavior, Animal; C

1973

Other Studies

139 other studies available for amphetamine and ADDH

ArticleYear
The effect of methylphenidate and mixed amphetamine salts on cognitive reflection: a field study.
    Psychopharmacology, 2022, Volume: 239, Issue:2

    Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cogni

2022
First Amphetamine Transdermal Patch Approved for ADHD.
    JAMA, 2022, 05-03, Volume: 327, Issue:17

    Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervo

2022
Theory of visual attention (TVA) applied to rats performing the 5-choice serial reaction time task: differential effects of dopaminergic and noradrenergic manipulations.
    Psychopharmacology, 2023, Volume: 240, Issue:1

    Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Cent

2023
Theory of visual attention (TVA) applied to rats performing the 5-choice serial reaction time task: differential effects of dopaminergic and noradrenergic manipulations.
    Psychopharmacology, 2023, Volume: 240, Issue:1

    Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Cent

2023
Theory of visual attention (TVA) applied to rats performing the 5-choice serial reaction time task: differential effects of dopaminergic and noradrenergic manipulations.
    Psychopharmacology, 2023, Volume: 240, Issue:1

    Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Cent

2023
Theory of visual attention (TVA) applied to rats performing the 5-choice serial reaction time task: differential effects of dopaminergic and noradrenergic manipulations.
    Psychopharmacology, 2023, Volume: 240, Issue:1

    Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Cent

2023
Theory of visual attention (TVA) applied to rats performing the 5-choice serial reaction time task: differential effects of dopaminergic and noradrenergic manipulations.
    Psychopharmacology, 2023, Volume: 240, Issue:1

    Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Cent

2023
Theory of visual attention (TVA) applied to rats performing the 5-choice serial reaction time task: differential effects of dopaminergic and noradrenergic manipulations.
    Psychopharmacology, 2023, Volume: 240, Issue:1

    Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Cent

2023
Theory of visual attention (TVA) applied to rats performing the 5-choice serial reaction time task: differential effects of dopaminergic and noradrenergic manipulations.
    Psychopharmacology, 2023, Volume: 240, Issue:1

    Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Cent

2023
Theory of visual attention (TVA) applied to rats performing the 5-choice serial reaction time task: differential effects of dopaminergic and noradrenergic manipulations.
    Psychopharmacology, 2023, Volume: 240, Issue:1

    Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Cent

2023
Theory of visual attention (TVA) applied to rats performing the 5-choice serial reaction time task: differential effects of dopaminergic and noradrenergic manipulations.
    Psychopharmacology, 2023, Volume: 240, Issue:1

    Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Cent

2023
Regional Disparities in Prescription Methamphetamine and Amphetamine Distribution Across the United States.
    Journal of attention disorders, 2023, Volume: 27, Issue:12

    Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Crime

2023
Switching patterns of immediate-release forms of generic mixed amphetamine salts products among privately and publicly insured individuals aged 15-64 years in the United States, 2013-2019.
    Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety, 2023, Volume: 32, Issue:10

    Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Drugs, Generic; Humans; Medicaid; Narcol

2023
Concomitant Drug Use among Opioid-Dependent Patients with and without Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: Does Methylphenidate Merit a Trial?
    European addiction research, 2023, Volume: 29, Issue:5

    Topics: Amphetamine; Analgesics, Opioid; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous Syst

2023
Evaluation and Management of Attention-Deficit/ Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in Children and Adolescents.
    South Dakota medicine : the journal of the South Dakota State Medical Association, 2023, Volume: 76, Issue:5

    Topics: Adolescent; Amphetamine; Attention; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Child; Employment

2023
Medical Cannabis Legalization: No Contribution to Rising Stimulant Rates in the USA.
    Pharmacopsychiatry, 2023, Volume: 56, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants

2023
ADHD medication and the inverted U-shaped curve: A pharmacological study in female mice performing the rodent Continuous Performance Test (rCPT).
    Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry, 2020, 04-20, Volume: 99

    Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Cent

2020
Amphetamine-Dextroamphetamine and Pregnancy: Neonatal Outcomes After Prenatal Prescription Mixed Amphetamine Exposure.
    Journal of attention disorders, 2021, Volume: 25, Issue:9

    Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Dextroamphetamine; Female; Humans; Infan

2021
A Sympathetic Treatment for Obesity.
    Cell metabolism, 2020, 06-02, Volume: 31, Issue:6

    Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Brain; Central Nervous System Stimulants

2020
Use Motives of Patients with Amphetamine-Type Stimulants Use Disorder and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.
    European addiction research, 2020, Volume: 26, Issue:4-5

    Topics: Adult; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants

2020
Trends in stimulant dispensing by age, sex, state of residence, and prescriber specialty - United States, 2014-2019.
    Drug and alcohol dependence, 2020, 12-01, Volume: 217

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Ce

2020
ADHD-like behaviors caused by inactivation of a transcription factor controlling the balance of inhibitory and excitatory neuron development in the mouse anterior brainstem.
    Translational psychiatry, 2020, 10-21, Volume: 10, Issue:1

    Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Brain Stem; Dopaminergic Neuron

2020
[Harmonized measurement and reporting of chiral amphetamine in the follow-up of ADHD treatment].
    Lakartidningen, 2020, 10-26, Volume: 117

    Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Follo

2020
Relationship Between Amphetamine Concentrations in Saliva and Serum in Children and Adolescents With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.
    Therapeutic drug monitoring, 2021, 08-01, Volume: 43, Issue:4

    Topics: Adolescent; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Child; Drug Monitoring; Fema

2021
Sedation After a Trial of Mixed Amphetamine Salts in a Boy with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.
    The American journal of case reports, 2020, Dec-17, Volume: 21

    Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Autism Spectrum Disorder; Child; Humans;

2020
A Longitudinal Study of Resting-State Connectivity and Response to Psychostimulant Treatment in ADHD.
    The American journal of psychiatry, 2021, 08-01, Volume: 178, Issue:8

    Topics: Adolescent; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Brain; Case-Control Studies;

2021
Adaptive aspects of impulsivity and interactions with effects of catecholaminergic agents in the 5-choice serial reaction time task: implications for ADHD.
    Psychopharmacology, 2021, Volume: 238, Issue:9

    Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Choice Behavior; Impulsive Beha

2021
Mixed Amphetamine Salts Without a Mood Stabilizer for Treating Comorbid Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and Bipolar Disorder: Two Case Reports.
    Military medicine, 2023, 05-16, Volume: 188, Issue:5-6

    Topics: Amphetamine; Antipsychotic Agents; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Bipolar Disorder;

2023
Transcriptional profiling of SHR/NCrl prefrontal cortex shows hyperactivity-associated genes responsive to amphetamine challenge.
    Genes, brain, and behavior, 2017, Volume: 16, Issue:7

    Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Ataxin-7; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous Syste

2017
Chiral analysis of amphetamines in hair by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry: compliance-monitoring of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) patients under Elvanse® therapy and identification after controlled low-dose application.
    Drug testing and analysis, 2018, Volume: 10, Issue:2

    Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Fo

2018
Mixed-amphetamine salts expectancies among college students: Is stimulant induced cognitive enhancement a placebo effect?
    Drug and alcohol dependence, 2017, 09-01, Volume: 178

    Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cogni

2017
Effect of methylphenidate on visual responses in the superior colliculus in the anaesthetised rat: Role of cortical activation.
    Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England), 2017, Volume: 31, Issue:10

    Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulan

2017
Placental Complications Associated With Psychostimulant Use in Pregnancy.
    Obstetrics and gynecology, 2017, Volume: 130, Issue:6

    Topics: Abruptio Placentae; Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors; Adult; Amphetamine; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Att

2017
Association Between Methylphenidate and Amphetamine Use in Pregnancy and Risk of Congenital Malformations: A Cohort Study From the International Pregnancy Safety Study Consortium.
    JAMA psychiatry, 2018, 02-01, Volume: 75, Issue:2

    Topics: Abnormalities, Drug-Induced; Adolescent; Adult; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperac

2018
Amphetamine, but not methylphenidate, increases ethanol intake in adolescent male, but not in female, rats.
    Brain and behavior, 2018, Volume: 8, Issue:4

    Topics: Alcohol Drinking; Amphetamine; Animals; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervo

2018
Pediatric ADHD Medication Exposures Reported to US Poison Control Centers.
    Pediatrics, 2018, Volume: 141, Issue:6

    Topics: Adolescent; Age Distribution; Amphetamine; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Attention Deficit Disorder wit

2018
Chronic amphetamine enhances visual input to and suppresses visual output from the superior colliculus in withdrawal.
    Neuropharmacology, 2018, Volume: 138

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Amphetamine; Animals; Attention; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity

2018
Resolution of Anxiety Symptoms in Response to Stimulants in a Patient With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and Generalized Anxiety Disorder.
    The primary care companion for CNS disorders, 2018, May-31, Volume: 20, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Amphetamine; Anxiety Disorders; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervou

2018
Effect of ADHD medication in male C57BL/6J mice performing the rodent Continuous Performance Test.
    Psychopharmacology, 2019, Volume: 236, Issue:6

    Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Attention; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperact

2019
Psychosis with Methylphenidate or Amphetamine in Patients with ADHD.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2019, 03-21, Volume: 380, Issue:12

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous Syste

2019
Psychosis during Attention Deficit-Hyperactivity Disorder Treatment with Stimulants.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2019, 03-21, Volume: 380, Issue:12

    Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Human

2019
Gender Effects in the Efficacy of Racemic Amphetamine Sulfate in Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.
    Advances in therapy, 2019, Volume: 36, Issue:6

    Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child

2019
Prevalence and Consequences of the Nonmedical Use of Amphetamine Among Persons Calling Poison Control Centers.
    Journal of attention disorders, 2019, Volume: 23, Issue:11

    Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Human

2019
Dopamine-mediated immunomodulation affects choroid plexus function.
    Brain, behavior, and immunity, 2019, Volume: 81

    Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Bipolar Disorder; Central Nervo

2019
Knockout of latrophilin-3 in Sprague-Dawley rats causes hyperactivity, hyper-reactivity, under-response to amphetamine, and disrupted dopamine markers.
    Neurobiology of disease, 2019, Volume: 130

    Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulan

2019
Surveillance of diversion and nonmedical use of extended-release prescription amphetamine and oral methylphenidate in the United States.
    Journal of addictive diseases, 2013, Volume: 32, Issue:1

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Amphetamine; Amphetamine-Related Disorders; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyper

2013
Estimating the passage of minutes: deviant oscillatory frontal activity in medicated and unmedicated ADHD.
    Neuropsychology, 2013, Volume: 27, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Brain Mapping; Central Nervous Sy

2013
Determination of amphetamine and methylphenidate in exhaled breath of patients undergoing attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder treatment.
    Therapeutic drug monitoring, 2014, Volume: 36, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Chromatography, Liquid; Exhalatio

2014
Comparing stimulant effects in youth with ADHD symptoms and epilepsy.
    Epilepsy & behavior : E&B, 2014, Volume: 36

    Topics: Adolescent; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimu

2014
Drug treatment for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and suicidal behaviour: register based study.
    BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2014, Jun-18, Volume: 348

    Topics: Adolescent; Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors; Adult; Amphetamine; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Attention D

2014
Medical treatment of children and youths with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): a Norwegian Prescription Registry Based Study.
    Global journal of health science, 2014, Apr-14, Volume: 6, Issue:4

    Topics: Adolescent; Amphetamine; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; C

2014
Treatment receipt and outcomes from a clinic employing the attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder treatment guideline of the children's medication algorithm project.
    Journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology, 2014, Volume: 24, Issue:9

    Topics: Adolescent; Algorithms; Amphetamine; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hype

2014
Effectiveness of one-year pharmacological treatment of adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): an open-label prospective study of time in treatment, dose, side-effects and comorbidity.
    European neuropsychopharmacology : the journal of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2014, Volume: 24, Issue:12

    Topics: Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors; Adult; Amphetamine; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Attention Deficit Disor

2014
A case series on the heightened autonomic response due to guanfacine and amphetamine interaction.
    Journal of clinical psychopharmacology, 2015, Volume: 35, Issue:2

    Topics: Adrenergic alpha-Agonists; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Autonomic Ner

2015
Single-quantum-dot tracking reveals altered membrane dynamics of an attention-deficit/hyperactivity-disorder-derived dopamine transporter coding variant.
    ACS chemical neuroscience, 2015, Apr-15, Volume: 6, Issue:4

    Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Cell Membrane; Central Nervous System St

2015
The billion dollar business of being smart.
    BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2015, Sep-14, Volume: 351

    Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Caffeine; Central Nervous System Stimula

2015
Adolescent D-amphetamine treatment in a rodent model of ADHD: Pro-cognitive effects in adolescence without an impact on cocaine cue reactivity in adulthood.
    Behavioural brain research, 2016, Jan-15, Volume: 297

    Topics: Aging; Amphetamine; Animals; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System S

2016
Is adjunctive pharmacotherapy in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder cost-effective in Canada: a cost-effectiveness assessment of guanfacine extended-release as an adjunctive therapy to a long-acting stimulant for the treatment of ADHD.
    BMC psychiatry, 2016, Jan-16, Volume: 16

    Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child

2016
Risk of Injury According to Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, Comorbid Mental Illness, and Medication Therapy.
    Pharmacopsychiatry, 2016, Volume: 49, Issue:2

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Amphetamine; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperacti

2016
Somnambulism During Monotherapy With Mixed Amphetamine Salts.
    Journal of clinical psychopharmacology, 2016, Volume: 36, Issue:2

    Topics: Adolescent; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Child; Delayed-Action Prepar

2016
Two new amphetamines for ADHD.
    The Medical letter on drugs and therapeutics, 2016, Jun-20, Volume: 58, Issue:1497

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous Sy

2016
Improvement of attention with amphetamine in low- and high-performing rats.
    Psychopharmacology, 2016, Volume: 233, Issue:18

    Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Attention; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous Syst

2016
Use of drugs for ADHD among adults-a multinational study among 15.8 million adults in the Nordic countries.
    European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2016, Volume: 72, Issue:12

    Topics: Adolescent; Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors; Adult; Amphetamine; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Attention D

2016
Adolescent d-amphetamine treatment in a rodent model of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: impact on cocaine abuse vulnerability in adulthood.
    Psychopharmacology, 2016, Volume: 233, Issue:23-24

    Topics: Amphetamine; Analysis of Variance; Animals; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central N

2016
Effects of amphetamine and methylphenidate on attentional performance and impulsivity in the mouse 5-Choice Serial Reaction Time Task.
    Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England), 2017, Volume: 31, Issue:2

    Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Attention; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Behavior, Animal; Ce

2017
Hemodynamic profile and behavioral characteristics during induction of anesthesia in pediatric patients with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.
    Paediatric anaesthesia, 2017, Volume: 27, Issue:4

    Topics: Adolescent; Amphetamine; Anesthesia; Anti-Anxiety Agents; Anxiety; Attention Deficit Disorder with H

2017
Children's self-reports on perceived effects on taking stimulant medication for ADHD.
    Journal of attention disorders, 2009, Volume: 12, Issue:5

    Topics: Achievement; Adolescent; Aggression; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Att

2009
Simulated driving changes in young adults with ADHD receiving mixed amphetamine salts extended release and atomoxetine.
    Journal of attention disorders, 2009, Volume: 12, Issue:4

    Topics: Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors; Adult; Amphetamine; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Attention Deficit Disor

2009
Treating adult ADHD with stimulants.
    CNS spectrums, 2008, Volume: 13, Issue:9 Suppl 13

    Topics: Adult; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants

2008
Stimulant dosing for children with ADHD: a medical claims analysis.
    Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 2009, Volume: 48, Issue:1

    Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child

2009
Cardiac safety of methylphenidate versus amphetamine salts in the treatment of ADHD.
    Pediatrics, 2009, Volume: 124, Issue:1

    Topics: Adolescent; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Blood Pressure; Central Nerv

2009
Psychostimulant treatment for ADHD is modulated by prefrontal cortex manipulation.
    Brain research bulletin, 2009, Dec-16, Volume: 80, Issue:6

    Topics: Amphetamine; Analysis of Variance; Animals; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Catheteri

2009
D2 dopamine receptor subtype-mediated hyperactivity and amphetamine responses in a model of ADHD.
    Neurobiology of disease, 2010, Volume: 37, Issue:1

    Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Benzopyrans; Corpus Striatum; D

2010
Outcomes after accidental pediatric ingestions of (dextro)amphetamine and methylphenidate.
    The American journal of emergency medicine, 2009, Volume: 27, Issue:8

    Topics: Accidents; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimul

2009
Central stimulants in the treatment of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children and adolescents. A naturalistic study of the prescription in Sweden, 1977-2007.
    Nordic journal of psychiatry, 2009, Volume: 63, Issue:6

    Topics: Adolescent; Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hy

2009
Forebrain overexpression of CK1delta leads to down-regulation of dopamine receptors and altered locomotor activity reminiscent of ADHD.
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010, Mar-02, Volume: 107, Issue:9

    Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Behavior, Animal; Casein Kinase

2010
Pharmacological treatment patterns among patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: retrospective claims-based analysis of a managed care population.
    Current medical research and opinion, 2010, Volume: 26, Issue:4

    Topics: Adolescent; Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors; Adult; Age Factors; Amphetamine; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride

2010
Peripheral vasculopathy associated with psychostimulant treatment in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
    Current psychiatry reports, 2010, Volume: 12, Issue:2

    Topics: Adolescent; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimu

2010
Evidence for subtle verbal fluency deficits in occasional stimulant users: quick to play loose with verbal rules.
    Journal of psychiatric research, 2011, Volume: 45, Issue:3

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous Syste

2011
Impulsiveness, overactivity, and poorer sustained attention improve by chronic treatment with low doses of l-amphetamine in an animal model of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD).
    Behavioral and brain functions : BBF, 2011, Mar-30, Volume: 7

    Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Attention; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Disease Models, Anim

2011
GIT1 is associated with ADHD in humans and ADHD-like behaviors in mice.
    Nature medicine, 2011, Volume: 17, Issue:5

    Topics: Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing; Amphetamine; Animals; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperact

2011
Stimulant adherence and academic performance in urban youth with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
    Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 2011, Volume: 50, Issue:5

    Topics: Achievement; Adolescent; Amphetamine; Anxiety Disorders; Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior D

2011
Methylphenidate and fluphenazine, but not amphetamine, differentially affect impulsive choice in spontaneously hypertensive, Wistar-Kyoto and Sprague-Dawley rats.
    Brain research, 2011, Jun-17, Volume: 1396

    Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulan

2011
Role for the membrane receptor guanylyl cyclase-C in attention deficiency and hyperactive behavior.
    Science (New York, N.Y.), 2011, Sep-16, Volume: 333, Issue:6049

    Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Attention; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Behavior, Animal; Cy

2011
ADHD medication use, adherence, persistence and cost among Texas Medicaid children.
    Current medical research and opinion, 2011, Volume: 27 Suppl 2

    Topics: Adolescent; Amphetamine; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; C

2011
Broadband neurophysiological abnormalities in the medial prefrontal region of the default-mode network in adults with ADHD.
    Human brain mapping, 2013, Volume: 34, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Brain Mapping; Brain Waves; Case-

2013
Brain region differences in regulation of Akt and GSK3 by chronic stimulant administration in mice.
    Cellular signalling, 2012, Volume: 24, Issue:7

    Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Arrestins; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; beta-Arrestins; Brai

2012
Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder-derived coding variation in the dopamine transporter disrupts microdomain targeting and trafficking regulation.
    The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2012, Apr-18, Volume: 32, Issue:16

    Topics: Adolescent; Amphetamine; Analysis of Variance; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Bacter

2012
Astrocyte-specific disruption of SynCAM1 signaling results in ADHD-like behavioral manifestations.
    PloS one, 2012, Volume: 7, Issue:4

    Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Anxiety; Astrocytes; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Behavior,

2012
The early history of the neuroscience of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
    Journal of the history of the neurosciences, 2012, Volume: 21, Issue:3

    Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child

2012
A population-based study of stimulant drug treatment of ADHD and academic progress in children.
    Pediatrics, 2012, Volume: 130, Issue:1

    Topics: Achievement; Age Factors; Amphetamine; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hy

2012
Possible association with amphetamine usage and development of high altitude pulmonary edema.
    Wilderness & environmental medicine, 2012, Volume: 23, Issue:4

    Topics: Altitude Sickness; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Dextroamphetamine; Hu

2012
Amphetamine-induced locomotion in a hyperdopaminergic ADHD mouse model depends on genetic background.
    Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior, 2013, Volume: 103, Issue:3

    Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Disease Models, Animal; Dopamin

2013
Hippocampal deep brain stimulation reverses physiological and behavioural deficits in a rodent model of schizophrenia.
    The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology, 2013, Volume: 16, Issue:6

    Topics: Action Potentials; Amphetamine; Animals; Animals, Newborn; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperacti

2013
Effects of atomoxetine on locomotor activity and impulsivity in the spontaneously hypertensive rat.
    Behavioural brain research, 2013, Apr-15, Volume: 243

    Topics: Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors; Amphetamine; Animals; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Attention Deficit Dis

2013
[Apropos the National Board and Welfare's report on ADDH: some views on the treatment with central nervous system stimulants].
    Lakartidningen, 2002, Aug-29, Volume: 99, Issue:35

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Brain; Central Nervou

2002
Phencyclidine exacerbates attentional deficits in a neurodevelopmental rat model of schizophrenia.
    Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2003, Volume: 28, Issue:10

    Topics: Aging; Amphetamine; Animals; Animals, Newborn; Attention; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactiv

2003
A COMPARISON OF CHLORDIAZEPOXIDE, D-AMPHETAMINE, AND PLACEBO IN THE TREATMENT OF THE HYPERKINETIC SYNDROME IN CHILDREN.
    The American journal of psychiatry, 1963, Volume: 120

    Topics: Amphetamine; Amphetamines; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Child; Chlordiazepoxide; D

1963
Can a therapeutic dose of amphetamine during pre-adolescence modify the pattern of synaptic organization in the brain?
    The European journal of neuroscience, 2003, Volume: 18, Issue:12

    Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Brain; Calcium-Calmodulin-Depen

2003
The dopamine D4 receptor is essential for hyperactivity and impaired behavioral inhibition in a mouse model of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
    Molecular psychiatry, 2004, Volume: 9, Issue:7

    Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Animals, Outbred Strains; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Behav

2004
[Altered behavioral response to centrally acting drugs in mice lacking PACAP].
    Nihon yakurigaku zasshi. Folia pharmacologica Japonica, 2003, Volume: 122 Suppl

    Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Behavior, Animal; Disease Model

2003
Psychostimulant treatment of adults with mental retardation and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.
    Australasian psychiatry : bulletin of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists, 2004, Volume: 12, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants

2004
Treating adolescent girls and women with ADHD: gender-specific issues.
    Journal of clinical psychology, 2005, Volume: 61, Issue:5

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Age Factors; Amphetamine; Anxiety Disorders; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hype

2005
Long-term effects of extended-release mixed amphetamine salts treatment of attention- deficit/hyperactivity disorder on growth.
    Journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology, 2005, Volume: 15, Issue:2

    Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Body Height; Body Mass Index; Body Weigh

2005
Amphetamine treatment similar to that used in the treatment of adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder damages dopaminergic nerve endings in the striatum of adult nonhuman primates.
    The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, 2005, Volume: 315, Issue:1

    Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Corpus Striatum; Dose-Response

2005
Sensitization to amphetamine, but not PCP, impairs attentional set shifting: reversal by a D1 receptor agonist injected into the medial prefrontal cortex.
    Psychopharmacology, 2005, Volume: 183, Issue:2

    Topics: 2,3,4,5-Tetrahydro-7,8-dihydroxy-1-phenyl-1H-3-benzazepine; Amphetamine; Analysis of Variance; Anima

2005
Algorithmically designed peptides ameliorate behavioral defects in animal model of ADHD by an allosteric mechanism.
    Journal of neuroscience methods, 2006, Feb-15, Volume: 151, Issue:1

    Topics: Acoustic Stimulation; Algorithms; Allosteric Site; Amphetamine; Animals; Attention Deficit Disorder

2006
Visual function and ocular features in children and adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, with and without treatment with stimulants.
    Eye (London, England), 2007, Volume: 21, Issue:4

    Topics: Adolescent; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimu

2007
The latest drugs on the FDA's radar.
    Behavioral healthcare, 2006, Volume: 26, Issue:6

    Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Contr

2006
Cardiovascular effects of mixed amphetamine salts extended release in the treatment of school-aged children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
    Biological psychiatry, 2007, Mar-01, Volume: 61, Issue:5

    Topics: Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Blood Pres

2007
[Medication for ADHD and the risk of cardiovascular mortality].
    Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde, 2006, Aug-05, Volume: 150, Issue:31

    Topics: Amphetamine; Arrhythmias, Cardiac; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Cardiovascular Dis

2006
[Medication for ADHD and the risk of cardiovascular mortality].
    Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde, 2006, Oct-14, Volume: 150, Issue:41

    Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Death

2006
D2-like dopamine receptors mediate the response to amphetamine in a mouse model of ADHD.
    Neurobiology of disease, 2007, Volume: 26, Issue:1

    Topics: Adenylyl Cyclases; Amphetamine; Animals; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Catalepsy; C

2007
Amphetamine and mCPP effects on dopamine and serotonin striatal in vivo microdialysates in an animal model of hyperactivity.
    Neurotoxicity research, 2007, Volume: 11, Issue:2

    Topics: 3,4-Dihydroxyphenylacetic Acid; 5,6-Dihydroxytryptamine; Age Factors; Amphetamine; Animals; Attentio

2007
[Prescribing of stimulants for ADHD in Nordland County].
    Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening : tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke, 2007, Sep-20, Volume: 127, Issue:18

    Topics: Adolescent; Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors; Adult; Amphetamine; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Attention D

2007
Interactions of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder therapeutic agents with the efflux transporter P-glycoprotein.
    European journal of pharmacology, 2008, Jan-14, Volume: 578, Issue:2-3

    Topics: Adenosine Triphosphate; Amphetamine; Animals; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; ATP Binding Cassette Transp

2008
Treatment of ADHD with amphetamine: short-term effects on family interaction.
    Journal of attention disorders, 2008, Volume: 12, Issue:1

    Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child

2008
School-based administration of ADHD drugs decline, along with diversion, theft, and misuse.
    The Journal of school nursing : the official publication of the National Association of School Nurses, 2007, Volume: 23, Issue:6

    Topics: Amphetamine; Amphetamine-Related Disorders; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Attitude

2007
Arousal, temporal and spatial uncertainty and drug effects.
    Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry, 1983, Volume: 7, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Alcohol Drinking; Amphetamine; Antipsychotic Agents; Arousal; Attention; Attention Deficit Di

1983
[Amphetamine in the therapy of hyperactivity in children].
    Lakartidningen, 1982, Dec-15, Volume: 79, Issue:50

    Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Child; Humans

1982
Origin of stimulant use for treatment of attention deficit disorder.
    The American journal of psychiatry, 1995, Volume: 152, Issue:2

    Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; History, 20th Century; Humans

1995
[Treatment of hyperactivity and attention deficit with amphetamine. Experience with five adult prisoners].
    Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening : tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke, 1996, Jun-30, Volume: 116, Issue:17

    Topics: Adult; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Humans; Male; Norway; Prisoners

1996
["The amphetamine treatment helped my child". Is it time to reevaluate Swedish practice in hyperactivity syndrome?].
    Lakartidningen, 1996, Nov-20, Volume: 93, Issue:47

    Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child

1996
Selegiline for the delivery of small doses of amphetamine.
    The Journal of neuropsychiatry and clinical neurosciences, 1997,Spring, Volume: 9, Issue:2

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Child; Child Developm

1997
The variable number of tandem repeats polymorphism of the dopamine transporter gene is not associated with significant change in dopamine transporter phenotype in humans.
    Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2001, Volume: 24, Issue:5

    Topics: Adult; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Benzamides; Carrier Proteins; Coc

2001
[Lack of respect for pediatric neuropsychiatry as a field of knowledge].
    Lakartidningen, 2001, May-23, Volume: 98, Issue:21

    Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child

2001
[Drug treatment of school children with attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder].
    Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening : tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke, 2001, Aug-20, Volume: 121, Issue:19

    Topics: Adolescent; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimu

2001
Does extended medication with amphetamine or methylphenidate reduce growth in hyperactive children?
    Nordic journal of psychiatry, 2002, Volume: 56, Issue:1

    Topics: Adolescent; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Body Height; Body Weight; Ce

2002
Possible role of 5-hydroxyptamine in minimal brain dysfunction.
    Life sciences, 1975, Apr-01, Volume: 16, Issue:7

    Topics: Amphetamine; Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena; Animals; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hy

1975
Selective brain dopamine depletion in developing rats: an experimental model of minimal brain dysfunction.
    Science (New York, N.Y.), 1976, Jan-23, Volume: 191, Issue:4224

    Topics: Age Factors; Amphetamine; Animals; Animals, Newborn; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity;

1976
[Drug therapy of minimal brain dysfunction syndrome (clinical study using Captagon)].
    Praxis der Kinderpsychologie und Kinderpsychiatrie, 1975, Volume: 24, Issue:5

    Topics: Amphetamine; Amphetamines; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Child; Child, Preschool; D

1975
Ten years of experience with 1,000 hyperactive children in a private practice.
    Pediatrics, 1985, Volume: 76, Issue:2

    Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Behavior Therapy; Body Height; Body Weig

1985
The natural life history of children with minimal brain dysfunction.
    Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1973, Feb-28, Volume: 205

    Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Cerebral Palsy; Child; Child Behavior Di

1973
Drugs in management of minimal brain dysfunction.
    Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1973, Feb-28, Volume: 205

    Topics: Amphetamine; Anticonvulsants; Antidepressive Agents; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity;

1973
Letter: Stimulant drugs for problem children.
    The New England journal of medicine, 1973, Dec-20, Volume: 289, Issue:25

    Topics: Adult; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Child; Child Behavior Disorders;

1973
The minimal brain dysfunction syndrome in children. I. The syndrome and its relevance for psychiatry. II. A psychological and biochemical model for the syndrome.
    The Journal of nervous and mental disease, 1972, Volume: 155, Issue:1

    Topics: Affect; Amphetamine; Arousal; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Autonomic Nervous Syste

1972
Postnatal lead acetate exposure in rats: possible relationship to minimal brain dysfunction.
    American journal of mental deficiency, 1974, Volume: 79, Issue:1

    Topics: Amphetamine; Animals; Animals, Newborn; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Disease Model

1974
Drugs for the hyperactive child.
    RN, 1972, Volume: 35, Issue:5

    Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Child Behavior Disorders; Humans; Motor

1972
Gilles de la Tourette's disease and minimal brain dysfunction: amphetamine isomers reveal catecholamine correlates in an affected patient.
    Psychopharmacologia, 1973, Volume: 29, Issue:3

    Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Brain; Child; Dextroamphetamine; Dopamin

1973
Hyperactivity in children.
    Journal of the National Medical Association, 1973, Volume: 65, Issue:1

    Topics: Amphetamine; Anticonvulsants; Antidepressive Agents; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity;

1973
The hyperactive child syndrome.
    American family physician, 1973, Volume: 8, Issue:3

    Topics: Age Factors; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Child Behavior Disorders; C

1973
The hyperactive child.
    Missouri medicine, 1973, Volume: 70, Issue:11

    Topics: Age Factors; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Child; Child, Preschool; Di

1973
[The minimal brain dysfunction syndrome].
    La Vie medicale au Canada francais, 1973, Volume: 2, Issue:7

    Topics: Affective Symptoms; Amphetamine; Anticonvulsants; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Chi

1973
[Amphetamines in the treatment of hyperactive and instable children].
    Ceskoslovenska pediatrie, 1973, Volume: 28, Issue:10

    Topics: Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Child; Female; Humans; Hyperkinesis; Mal

1973
Average evoked responses in normal and minimally brain dysfunctioned children treated with amphetamine.
    Archives of general psychiatry, 1973, Volume: 29, Issue:6

    Topics: Acoustic Stimulation; Age Factors; Amphetamine; Attention; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperacti

1973
Minimal brain dysfunctions in children.
    American family physician, 1974, Volume: 10, Issue:1

    Topics: Amphetamine; Attention; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Child; Child, Preschool; Comm

1974
Hyperactivity in children: types, diagosis, drug therapy, approaches to management.
    Clinical pediatrics, 1972, Volume: 11, Issue:1

    Topics: Amphetamine; Anxiety; Attention; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Brain Damage, Chroni

1972