Page last updated: 2024-10-22

amlodipine and Essential Hypertension

amlodipine has been researched along with Essential Hypertension in 62 studies

Amlodipine: A long-acting dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker. It is effective in the treatment of ANGINA PECTORIS and HYPERTENSION.
amlodipine : A fully substituted dialkyl 1,4-dihydropyridine-3,5-dicarboxylate derivative, which is used for the treatment of hypertension, chronic stable angina and confirmed or suspected vasospastic angina.

Essential Hypertension: Hypertension that occurs without known cause, or preexisting renal disease. Associated polymorphisms for a number of genes have been identified, including AGT, GNB3, and ECE1. OMIM: 145500

Research Excerpts

ExcerptRelevanceReference
"Allisartan isoproxil is a selective nonpeptide angiotensin II (AT1) receptor blocker developed by China, this study aimed to assess its clinical efficacy for essential hypertension (EH)."9.69Efficacy of Allisartan Isoproxil in the Treatment of Mild-to-Moderate Essential Hypertension. ( Chen, Y; Lu, X; Sun, N; Wang, H; Wang, L; Xi, Y; Yang, F, 2023)
"We aimed to determine the efficacy and tolerability of a fixed-dose SPC consisting of 5 mg amlodipine, 100 mg losartan, 20 mg rosuvastatin, and 10 mg ezetimibe (A/L/R/E) in patients with concomitant hypertension and dyslipidemia."9.69A Randomized, Multicenter, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of a Quadruple Combination of Amlodipine, Losartan, Rosuvastatin, and Ezetimibe in Patients with Concomitant Essential Hypertension and Dyslipidemia. ( Ahn, Y; Chae, IH; Hong, SJ; Hong, TJ; Kang, DH; Kim, BK; Kim, H; Kim, HS; Kim, MC; Kim, MH; Kim, SH; Kim, SY; Kim, W; Rhee, MY, 2023)
"Our study indicated that olmesartan and amlodipine could improve endothelial function in patients with essential hypertension in different manners, suppression of vascular inflammation, and decrease in blood pressure variability, respectively."9.69Effects of olmesartan and amlodipine on blood pressure, endothelial function, and vascular inflammation. ( Abe, T; Bekki, M; Fukumoto, Y; Honda, A; Igata, S; Kurata, S; Maeda-Ogata, S; Matsui, T; Nishino, Y; Sugiyama, Y; Tahara, A; Tahara, N; Yamagishi, SI, 2023)
"The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fixed-dose combination (FDC) of metoprolol, telmisartan, and chlorthalidone in patients with essential hypertension and stable coronary artery disease (CAD) who showed inadequate response to dual therapy."9.51Fixed-dose Combination of Metoprolol, Telmisartan, and Chlorthalidone for Essential Hypertension in Adults with Stable Coronary Artery Disease: Phase III Study. ( Agrawal, S; Anand, J; Bachani, D; Doshi, M; Gaikwad, VB; Halder, SK; Kinholkar, B; Kumar, DA; Kumbhar, A; Mathur, R; Mehta, S; Sarkar, G; Sharma, A, 2022)
"We investigated changes in blood pressure (BP) and metabolic adverse effects, especially elevation of uric acid (UA), after treatment with a thiazide-like diuretic (TD) in patients with essential hypertension."9.34Genetic factors associated with elevation of uric acid after treatment with thiazide-like diuretic in patients with essential hypertension. ( Hanada, H; Higaki, J; Higashiura, K; Horio, T; Hosomi, N; Igase, M; Ishimitsu, T; Iwashima, Y; Kamide, K; Katabuchi, R; Kato, J; Kawano, Y; Kojima, S; Komai, N; Matsuura, H; Miki, T; Miwa, Y; Miyata, T; Morimoto, S; Nakahama, H; Nakahashi, T; Nakamura, S; Ohta, Y; Oukura, T; Rakugi, H; Sasaguri, T; Sase, K; Shimamoto, K; Shinagawa, T; Soma, M; Sugimoto, K; Takeda, K; Takiuchi, S; Tomohiro Katsuya, T; Tsuchihashi, T; Ueno, M; Yoshihara, F, 2020)
"The aim of this study was to assess the effects of irbesartan alone and combined with amlodipine, efonidipine, or trichlormethiazide on blood pressure (BP) and urinary albumin (UA) excretion in hypertensive patients with microalbuminuria (30≤UA/creatinine (Cr) ratio [UACR] <300 mg/g Cr) and upper-normal microalbuminuria (10≤UACR<30 mg/g Cr)."9.27Effect of amlodipine, efonidipine, and trichlormethiazide on home blood pressure and upper-normal microalbuminuria assessed by casual spot urine test in essential hypertensive patients. ( Asayama, K; Hanazawa, T; Hosaka, M; Imai, Y; Inoue, R; Obara, T; Ohkubo, T; Satoh, M; Watabe, D, 2018)
"This 8-week study in Korea aimed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a telmisartan/amlodipine + hydrochlorothiazide (TAH) combination versus telmisartan/amlodipine (TA) combination in patients with essential hypertension that did not respond appropriately to 4-week treatment with TA."9.27Efficacy and Tolerability of Telmisartan/Amlodipine + Hydrochlorothiazide Versus Telmisartan/Amlodipine Combination Therapy for Essential Hypertension Uncontrolled With Telmisartan/Amlodipine: The Phase III, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind TAHYTI St ( Ahn, JC; Ahn, JH; Ahn, YK; Cha, DH; Chae, IH; Cho, DK; Cho, SK; Choi, YJ; Hong, SJ; Hong, TJ; Hyon, MS; Jang, JY; Jeon, DW; Jeong, JO; Kim, BS; Kim, HS; Kim, SH; Nam, CW; Oh, YS; Park, SH; Rha, SW; Song, JM; Sung, KC; Won, KH; Yang, TH; Yoo, BS; Yoo, KD; Yoon, YW, 2018)
"The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a triple combination of amlodipine/losartan/rosuvastatin in patients with hypertension and hypercholesterolemia."9.24A Randomized, Multicenter, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and the Tolerability of a Triple Combination of Amlodipine/Losartan/Rosuvastatin in Patients With Comorbid Essential Hypertension and Hyperlipidemia. ( Cha, DH; Choi, JH; Choi, JY; Choi, KJ; Choi, SW; Hong, TJ; Jung, HO; Kim, KH; Kim, SM; Kim, SY; Kim, WS; Lee, HY; Lee, KJ; Oh, JH; Park, DG; Park, SW; Park, TH; Rha, SW; Rhee, MY; Ryu, DR; Shim, J; Song, PS; Yoo, BS, 2017)
" The purpose of this study was to explore the optimal dosage of a fixed-dose combination of candesartan cilexetil (CAN) and amlodipine besylate (AML), by examining the tolerability and efficacy of CAN/AML combination therapy compared with those of monotherapy with either drug in patients with essential hypertension."9.24Efficacy and Tolerability of Combination Therapy Versus Monotherapy with Candesartan and/or Amlodipine for Dose Finding in Essential Hypertension: A Phase II Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind Clinical Trial. ( Ahn, T; Chae, SC; Cho, EJ; Cho, JH; Choi, JY; Chung, WB; Hong, TJ; Ihm, SH; Jeon, HK; Jeong, MH; Kim, CJ; Kim, WS; Kim, YK; Lee, HY; Lee, JH; Nam, CW; Park, JI; Park, SM; Shin, ES; Sohn, IS; Yang, TH; Yoon, JH; Youn, HJ, 2017)
"The goal of this study was to evaluate whether the blood pressure-lowering efficacy of fimasartan/amlodipine combination therapy was superior to that of fimasartan monotherapy after 8 weeks of treatment in patients with hypertension who had failed to respond adequately to fimasartan monotherapy."9.22A Randomized, Double-blind, Multicenter, Phase III Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Fimasartan/Amlodipine Combined Therapy Versus Fimasartan Monotherapy in Patients With Essential Hypertension Unresponsive to Fimasartan Monotherapy. ( Cha, KS; Chae, SC; Chun, KJ; Ihm, SH; Il Kim, D; Jeong, JO; Joo, SJ; Kim, CH; Kim, DS; Kim, JJ; Kim, KH; Kim, KI; Kim, MH; Kim, YJ; Nam, CW; Park, S; Park, SM; Rhee, MY; Seo, HS; Shin, ES; Shin, J; Shin, MS; Sung, KC; Yoo, BS; Youn, HJ, 2016)
"Japanese patients with uncontrolled essential hypertension received single-blind losartan 50 mg/hydrochlorothiazide 12."9.20Efficacy and safety of fixed-dose losartan/hydrochlorothiazide/amlodipine combination versus losartan/hydrochlorothiazide combination in Japanese patients with essential hypertension. ( Azuma, K; Fujita, KP; Nishida, C; Numaguchi, H; Rakugi, H; Shimada, K; Shirakawa, M; Tsuchihashi, T; Yamaguchi, H, 2015)
"5)/amlodipine 5 mg (A5) versus co-administration of L50 plus A5 (L50+A5) in Japanese subjects with uncontrolled essential hypertension."9.20Add-on effect of hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg in Japanese subjects with essential hypertension uncontrolled with losartan 50 mg and amlodipine 5 mg. ( Azuma, K; Fujita, KP; Nishida, C; Numaguchi, H; Rakugi, H; Shimada, K; Shirakawa, M; Tsuchihashi, T; Yamaguchi, H, 2015)
"The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a fimasartan/amlodipine combination in patients with hypertension and to determine the optimal composition for a future single-pill combination formulation."9.20A Randomized, Multicenter, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, 3 × 3 Factorial Design, Phase II Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of the Combination of Fimasartan/Amlodipine in Patients With Essential Hypertension. ( Ahn, T; Ahn, Y; Bae Park, J; Cho, EJ; Choi, DJ; Chull Chae, S; Chun, KJ; Han, KR; Hyon, MS; Jeon, ES; Jeong, JO; Joo, SJ; Kim, DI; Kim, DS; Kim, JJ; Kim, KS; Kim, YJ; Kwan, J; Lee, HY; Oh, SK; Park, JS; Rhee, MY; Seog Seo, H; Shin, JH; Sung, KC; Yoo, BS; Youn, HJ, 2015)
"Being safe, the fixed-dose lisinopril and amlodipine combination is effective in lowering blood pressure in patients with hypertensive disease (HD) concurrent with coronary heart disease (CHD) or atherosclerotic changes in the carotid artery."9.19[A fixed-dose lisinopril and amlodipine combination in conjunction with rosuvastatin in patients with hypertensive disease and coronary heart disease]. ( Galeeva, ZM; Galiavich, AS, 2014)
"The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of the FDC of azilsartan (AZI) and amlodipine besylate (AML) with those of AZI monotherapy and AML monotherapy in Japanese patients with grade 1 to 2 essential hypertension."9.19Evaluation of the efficacy and tolerability of fixed-dose combination therapy of azilsartan and amlodipine besylate in Japanese patients with grade I to II essential hypertension. ( Kagawa, T; Nakata, E; Rakugi, H; Sasaki, E, 2014)
"In patients who were previously uncontrolled on CCB monotherapy or untreated with grade 2 or 3 hypertension, single-pill combination indapamide SR/amlodipine reduced BP effectively--especially SBP--over 45 days, and was safe and well tolerated."9.19Blood pressure control with a single-pill combination of indapamide sustained-release and amlodipine in patients with hypertension: the EFFICIENT study. ( Gujral, VK; Hiremath, J; Jadhav, U; Namjoshi, DJ; Safar, M; Shamanna, P; Siraj, M; Tripathi, KK, 2014)
"The objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy of the fixed-dose combination olmesartan/amlodipine 40/10 mg in patients with moderate essential hypertension not controlled on candesartan 32 mg."9.19Daytime systolic ambulatory blood pressure with a two-step switch from candesartan to olmesartan monotherapy and the fixed-dose combination of olmesartan/amlodipine in patients with uncontrolled essential hypertension (SEVICONTROL-2). ( Bramlage, P; Fimmers, R; Gansz, A; Lüders, S; Nadal, J; Schmieder, RE; Schrader, J; Sturm, CD; Zemmrich, C, 2014)
"A direct switch of candesartan to the fixed-dose combination olmesartan/amlodipine in uncontrolled hypertension is a frequent clinical requirement but is not covered by current labeling."9.17Daytime systolic ambulatory blood pressure with a direct switch between candesartan monotherapy and the fixed-dose combination olmesartan/amlodipine in patients with uncontrolled essential hypertension (SEVICONTROL-1). ( Bramlage, P; Fimmers, R; Gansz, A; Lüders, S; Nadal, J; Schmieder, RE; Schrader, J; Sturm, CD; Zemmrich, C, 2013)
" In present study, we aimed to investigate the effects of valsartan as an angiotensin II receptor antagonist and amlodipine as a calcium channel blocker on the vWf levels and N/L ratio in patients with essential hypertension."9.17The comparative effects of valsartan and amlodipine on vWf levels and N/L ratio in patients with newly diagnosed hypertension. ( Arslan, Z; Balta, S; Bozoglu, E; Bulucu, F; Cakar, M; Celik, T; Demirbas, S; Demirkol, S; Karaman, M; Kocak, N; Kurt, O; Naharci, I; Sarlak, H; Seyit Ahmet, AY, 2013)
"To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of L-amlodipine besylate for blood pressure control in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension."9.17[The effectiveness and safety of L-amlodipine besylate for blood pressure control in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension]. ( Hu, DY; Jia, T; Yu, JM; Zhan, YQ; Zhang, LJ, 2013)
"Although amlodipine is recommended as the first-line therapy for the treatment of hypertension, its use is limited by its potential side effects."8.12Ambulatory blood pressure response to S-amlodipine in Korean adult patients with uncontrolled essential hypertension: A prospective, observational study. ( Ahn, JH; Ahn, KT; Choi, WG; Jung, IH; Kang, SH; Kim, DK; Kim, SS; Lee, JH; Lee, KH; Na, JO; Park, SD; Seo, J, 2022)
"The analysis will evaluate the efficiency and level of safeness of levamlodipine besylate combined treatment for essential hypertension."8.12Clinical assessment of levamlodipine besylate combination therapy for essential hypertension: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis. ( Dai, GY; Zhu, YH, 2022)
"A total of 108 mild-to-moderate essential hypertension patients in Chinese Han nationality were treated with amlodipine for 8 weeks at a dosage of 5 mg/d."7.83[Association between gene polymorphism of calcium/calmodulin-dependent kinase 4 and efficacy of amlodipine in the treatment of hypertension in Chinese Han nationality]. ( Chen, Y; Liu, L; Liu, Y; Luo, Y; Yang, L; Yao, J; Zhong, G, 2016)
"to assess efficacy of a fixed combination of perindopril arginine and amlodipine besylate in the treatment of hypertensive patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) and signs of chronic kidney disease (CKD)."7.81[Therapy of Arterial Hypertension in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure and Signs of Chronic Kidney Disease With Fixed Perindopril/Amlodipine Combination]. ( Borovkov, NN; Borovkova, NJ; Kovaleva, GV; Kuznecova, TE, 2015)
" There are no serious adverse event and no one discontinued medication due to adverse event."7.30Efficacy and safety of standard dose triple combination of telmisartan 80 mg/amlodipine 5 mg/chlorthalidone 25 mg in primary hypertension: A randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, multicenter phase 3 trial. ( Ahn, Y; Cha, KS; Chang, K; Cho, EJ; Choi, DJ; Choi, SY; Doh, JH; Hong, SJ; Hong, SP; Hwang, JY; Hyon, MS; Ihm, SH; Kang, WC; Kim, HS; Kim, MH; Kim, SH; Kim, WS; Kim, YH; Kwon, K; Lee, JH; Lee, N; Lim, SW; Rhee, MY; Shin, J; Son, JW; Yoo, BS, 2023)
" During follow-up, the OA dosage is adjusted according to the ABPM and OBPM results."7.30The effects of Olmesartan/amlodipine administered in the Morning or At Night on nocturnal blood pressure reduction in Chinese patients with mild-moderate essential hypertension (OMAN Trial): study protocol for a prospective, multicenter, randomized, open- ( Chen, X; Jia, S; Li, X; Liao, H; Liu, K; Liu, X; Meng, Q; Shi, R; Sun, L; Wang, S; Wang, Z; Xu, M; Ye, R; Zhang, X; Zhang, Z, 2023)
"Most adverse events (AEs) were mild or moderate in intensity, and no deaths or treatment-related serious AEs were reported."6.87A phase III, open-label, multicenter study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of long-term triple combination therapy with azilsartan, amlodipine, and hydrochlorothiazide in patients with essential hypertension. ( Nishiyama, Y; Rakugi, H; Sano, Y; Shimizu, K; Umeda, Y, 2018)
" The adverse events (AEs) during both treatment periods were generally mild."6.84The efficacy and long-term safety of a triple combination of 80 mg telmisartan, 5 mg amlodipine and 12.5 mg hydrochlorothiazide in Japanese patients with essential hypertension: a randomized, double-blind study with open-label extension. ( Higaki, J; Ikeda, H; Komuro, I; Kuroki, D; Nishimura, S; Ogihara, T; Shiki, K; Taniguchi, A; Ugai, H, 2017)
" Both treatment regimens were well tolerated regarding adverse events or laboratory testing."6.84Blood pressure-lowering efficacy and safety of perindopril/indapamide/amlodipine single-pill combination in patients with uncontrolled essential hypertension: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. ( Amodeo, C; Asmar, R; Brzozowska-Villatte, R; de Champvallins, M; Mourad, JJ, 2017)
" There were no differences between 4 dosing regimens in laboratory and clinical parameters of safety and tolerability."6.79[Fixed irbesartan/amlodipine combination: efficacy and safety of the use of four dosing regimens in patients with arterial hypertension]. ( Kobalava, ZhD, 2014)
" Population pharmacokinetic analyses were performed on data which were collected prospectively from 60 Chinese patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension [age range 40-74 years, males (n = 31), females (n = 29)] receiving oral racemic amlodipine for 4 weeks."6.79ABCB1 polymorphism and gender affect the pharmacokinetics of amlodipine in Chinese patients with essential hypertension: a population analysis. ( Barrett, JS; Guo, CX; Hua, Y; Huang, ZJ; Pei, Q; Wang, JL; Yang, GP; Yuan, H; Zhang, WL; Zhou, HH; Zuo, XC, 2014)
"The current study addresses the 24-h antihypertensive efficacy and safety of arotinolol combined with a different calcium channel blocker."6.79The efficacy and safety of arotinolol combined with a different calcium channel blocker in the treatment of Chinese patients with essential hypertension: a one-year follow-up study. ( Chen, W; Fang, H; Liu, X; Xu, W, 2014)
"Our study indicated that olmesartan and amlodipine could improve endothelial function in patients with essential hypertension in different manners, suppression of vascular inflammation, and decrease in blood pressure variability, respectively."5.69Effects of olmesartan and amlodipine on blood pressure, endothelial function, and vascular inflammation. ( Abe, T; Bekki, M; Fukumoto, Y; Honda, A; Igata, S; Kurata, S; Maeda-Ogata, S; Matsui, T; Nishino, Y; Sugiyama, Y; Tahara, A; Tahara, N; Yamagishi, SI, 2023)
"Allisartan isoproxil is a selective nonpeptide angiotensin II (AT1) receptor blocker developed by China, this study aimed to assess its clinical efficacy for essential hypertension (EH)."5.69Efficacy of Allisartan Isoproxil in the Treatment of Mild-to-Moderate Essential Hypertension. ( Chen, Y; Lu, X; Sun, N; Wang, H; Wang, L; Xi, Y; Yang, F, 2023)
"We aimed to determine the efficacy and tolerability of a fixed-dose SPC consisting of 5 mg amlodipine, 100 mg losartan, 20 mg rosuvastatin, and 10 mg ezetimibe (A/L/R/E) in patients with concomitant hypertension and dyslipidemia."5.69A Randomized, Multicenter, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of a Quadruple Combination of Amlodipine, Losartan, Rosuvastatin, and Ezetimibe in Patients with Concomitant Essential Hypertension and Dyslipidemia. ( Ahn, Y; Chae, IH; Hong, SJ; Hong, TJ; Kang, DH; Kim, BK; Kim, H; Kim, HS; Kim, MC; Kim, MH; Kim, SH; Kim, SY; Kim, W; Rhee, MY, 2023)
"Eighty-six elderly patients with essential hypertension were randomized into a control group (oral Amlodipine Besylate Tablets) and an observation group (oral Amlodipine Besylate Tablets + HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor atorvastatin calcium)."5.69Effect and mechanism of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor on the improvement of elderly essential hypertension-induced vascular endothelial function impairment based on the JAK/STAT pathway. ( Fan, H; Liu, Z; Luo, W; Ouyang, F; Tang, L; Yan, Y; Yang, H; Yuan, W, 2023)
" Serious adverse events (SAEs) and unexpected adverse events (UAEs) occurred in 0."5.56Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of a Single-Pill Combination of Olmesartan/Amlodipine/Hydrochlorothiazide in Korean Patients with Essential Hypertension (RESOLVE): A Large, Observational, Retrospective, Cohort Study. ( Park, SJ; Rhee, SJ, 2020)
"The aim of this clinical trial was to assess the efficacy and safety of low-dose triple combinations of amlodipine, telmisartan, and chlorthalidone in patients with essential hypertension."5.51Efficacy and safety of low-dose antihypertensive combination of amlodipine, telmisartan, and chlorthalidone: A randomized, double-blind, parallel, phase II trial. ( Ahn, JC; Cho, EJ; Han, SH; Kang, SM; Kim, KH; Kim, KI; Kim, SY; Kim, W; Kim, YJ; Park, CG; Park, SJ; Park, SM; Shin, J; Shin, JH; Sohn, IS; Sung, JH; Sung, KC, 2022)
"The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fixed-dose combination (FDC) of metoprolol, telmisartan, and chlorthalidone in patients with essential hypertension and stable coronary artery disease (CAD) who showed inadequate response to dual therapy."5.51Fixed-dose Combination of Metoprolol, Telmisartan, and Chlorthalidone for Essential Hypertension in Adults with Stable Coronary Artery Disease: Phase III Study. ( Agrawal, S; Anand, J; Bachani, D; Doshi, M; Gaikwad, VB; Halder, SK; Kinholkar, B; Kumar, DA; Kumbhar, A; Mathur, R; Mehta, S; Sarkar, G; Sharma, A, 2022)
"To evaluate, in patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertension, the effects of 6 months treatment with canagliflozin, or perindopril, an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, on central BP and carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV)."5.51Diabetic patients with essential hypertension treated with amlodipine: blood pressure and arterial stiffness effects of canagliflozin or perindopril. ( Ramirez, AJ; Sanchez, MJ; Sanchez, RA, 2019)
"We investigated changes in blood pressure (BP) and metabolic adverse effects, especially elevation of uric acid (UA), after treatment with a thiazide-like diuretic (TD) in patients with essential hypertension."5.34Genetic factors associated with elevation of uric acid after treatment with thiazide-like diuretic in patients with essential hypertension. ( Hanada, H; Higaki, J; Higashiura, K; Horio, T; Hosomi, N; Igase, M; Ishimitsu, T; Iwashima, Y; Kamide, K; Katabuchi, R; Kato, J; Kawano, Y; Kojima, S; Komai, N; Matsuura, H; Miki, T; Miwa, Y; Miyata, T; Morimoto, S; Nakahama, H; Nakahashi, T; Nakamura, S; Ohta, Y; Oukura, T; Rakugi, H; Sasaguri, T; Sase, K; Shimamoto, K; Shinagawa, T; Soma, M; Sugimoto, K; Takeda, K; Takiuchi, S; Tomohiro Katsuya, T; Tsuchihashi, T; Ueno, M; Yoshihara, F, 2020)
" A total of 121 participants with type 2 diabetes and uncontrolled essential hypertension, who were receiving medium doses of amlodipine (5 mg/day) and ARB, were enrolled."5.30Randomized trial of an increased dose of calcium channel blocker or angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker as an add-on intensive depressor therapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with uncontrolled essential hypertension: the ACADEMIE Study. ( Fukushima, M; Hoshino, F; Imaizumi, S; Kusumoto, T; Matsunaga, A; Miura, SI; Morito, N; Nagata, Y; Norimatsu, K; Ogawa, M; Sako, H; Saku, K; Shiga, Y; Shimono, D; Shirotani, T; Sugihara, H; Tanigawa, H; Uehara, Y; Yahiro, E, 2019)
"The aim of this study was to assess the effects of irbesartan alone and combined with amlodipine, efonidipine, or trichlormethiazide on blood pressure (BP) and urinary albumin (UA) excretion in hypertensive patients with microalbuminuria (30≤UA/creatinine (Cr) ratio [UACR] <300 mg/g Cr) and upper-normal microalbuminuria (10≤UACR<30 mg/g Cr)."5.27Effect of amlodipine, efonidipine, and trichlormethiazide on home blood pressure and upper-normal microalbuminuria assessed by casual spot urine test in essential hypertensive patients. ( Asayama, K; Hanazawa, T; Hosaka, M; Imai, Y; Inoue, R; Obara, T; Ohkubo, T; Satoh, M; Watabe, D, 2018)
"This 8-week study in Korea aimed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a telmisartan/amlodipine + hydrochlorothiazide (TAH) combination versus telmisartan/amlodipine (TA) combination in patients with essential hypertension that did not respond appropriately to 4-week treatment with TA."5.27Efficacy and Tolerability of Telmisartan/Amlodipine + Hydrochlorothiazide Versus Telmisartan/Amlodipine Combination Therapy for Essential Hypertension Uncontrolled With Telmisartan/Amlodipine: The Phase III, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind TAHYTI St ( Ahn, JC; Ahn, JH; Ahn, YK; Cha, DH; Chae, IH; Cho, DK; Cho, SK; Choi, YJ; Hong, SJ; Hong, TJ; Hyon, MS; Jang, JY; Jeon, DW; Jeong, JO; Kim, BS; Kim, HS; Kim, SH; Nam, CW; Oh, YS; Park, SH; Rha, SW; Song, JM; Sung, KC; Won, KH; Yang, TH; Yoo, BS; Yoo, KD; Yoon, YW, 2018)
" The purpose of this study was to explore the optimal dosage of a fixed-dose combination of candesartan cilexetil (CAN) and amlodipine besylate (AML), by examining the tolerability and efficacy of CAN/AML combination therapy compared with those of monotherapy with either drug in patients with essential hypertension."5.24Efficacy and Tolerability of Combination Therapy Versus Monotherapy with Candesartan and/or Amlodipine for Dose Finding in Essential Hypertension: A Phase II Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind Clinical Trial. ( Ahn, T; Chae, SC; Cho, EJ; Cho, JH; Choi, JY; Chung, WB; Hong, TJ; Ihm, SH; Jeon, HK; Jeong, MH; Kim, CJ; Kim, WS; Kim, YK; Lee, HY; Lee, JH; Nam, CW; Park, JI; Park, SM; Shin, ES; Sohn, IS; Yang, TH; Yoon, JH; Youn, HJ, 2017)
"The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a triple combination of amlodipine/losartan/rosuvastatin in patients with hypertension and hypercholesterolemia."5.24A Randomized, Multicenter, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and the Tolerability of a Triple Combination of Amlodipine/Losartan/Rosuvastatin in Patients With Comorbid Essential Hypertension and Hyperlipidemia. ( Cha, DH; Choi, JH; Choi, JY; Choi, KJ; Choi, SW; Hong, TJ; Jung, HO; Kim, KH; Kim, SM; Kim, SY; Kim, WS; Lee, HY; Lee, KJ; Oh, JH; Park, DG; Park, SW; Park, TH; Rha, SW; Rhee, MY; Ryu, DR; Shim, J; Song, PS; Yoo, BS, 2017)
"The goal of this study was to evaluate whether the blood pressure-lowering efficacy of fimasartan/amlodipine combination therapy was superior to that of fimasartan monotherapy after 8 weeks of treatment in patients with hypertension who had failed to respond adequately to fimasartan monotherapy."5.22A Randomized, Double-blind, Multicenter, Phase III Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Fimasartan/Amlodipine Combined Therapy Versus Fimasartan Monotherapy in Patients With Essential Hypertension Unresponsive to Fimasartan Monotherapy. ( Cha, KS; Chae, SC; Chun, KJ; Ihm, SH; Il Kim, D; Jeong, JO; Joo, SJ; Kim, CH; Kim, DS; Kim, JJ; Kim, KH; Kim, KI; Kim, MH; Kim, YJ; Nam, CW; Park, S; Park, SM; Rhee, MY; Seo, HS; Shin, ES; Shin, J; Shin, MS; Sung, KC; Yoo, BS; Youn, HJ, 2016)
"The combination olmesartan/amlodipine is safe, well tolerated, and as effective as the combination of perindopril/amlodipine in the control of essential hypertension in patients with diabetes mellitus."5.22Comparative study of the efficacy of olmesartan/amlodipine vs. perindopril/amlodipine in peripheral blood pressure after missed dose in type 2 diabetes. ( Pichler, G; Redon, J, 2016)
"To assess the blood pressure-lowering efficacy and tolerability of perindopril/amlodipine fixed-dose combinations in Chinese patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension not adequately controlled with monotherapy alone."5.22Efficacy and Safety of Fixed-Dose Perindopril Arginine/Amlodipine in Hypertensive Patients Not Adequately Controlled with Amlodipine 5 mg or Perindopril tert-Butylamine 4 mg Monotherapy. ( Hu, D; Huang, J; Liao, Y; Sun, Y; Yang, K; Zhao, R, 2016)
"The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a fimasartan/amlodipine combination in patients with hypertension and to determine the optimal composition for a future single-pill combination formulation."5.20A Randomized, Multicenter, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, 3 × 3 Factorial Design, Phase II Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of the Combination of Fimasartan/Amlodipine in Patients With Essential Hypertension. ( Ahn, T; Ahn, Y; Bae Park, J; Cho, EJ; Choi, DJ; Chull Chae, S; Chun, KJ; Han, KR; Hyon, MS; Jeon, ES; Jeong, JO; Joo, SJ; Kim, DI; Kim, DS; Kim, JJ; Kim, KS; Kim, YJ; Kwan, J; Lee, HY; Oh, SK; Park, JS; Rhee, MY; Seog Seo, H; Shin, JH; Sung, KC; Yoo, BS; Youn, HJ, 2015)
" The Genetics of Drug Responsiveness in Essential Hypertension (GENRES) study is a double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over study where each subject received amlodipine, bisoprolol,hydrochlorothiazide, and losartan, each as a monotherapy, in a randomized order."5.20Pharmacogenomics of hypertension: a genome‐wide, placebo‐controlled cross‐over study, using four classes of antihypertensive drugs. ( Boerwinkle, E; Chapman, AB; Cooper-DeHoff, RM; Donner, KM; Frau, F; Glorioso, N; Glorioso, V; Gong, Y; Gums, JG; Hiltunen, TP; Johnson, JA; Kontula, KK; Ripatti, S; Saarela, J; Salvi, E; Sarin, AP; Turner, ST; Zaninello, R, 2015)
"5)/amlodipine 5 mg (A5) versus co-administration of L50 plus A5 (L50+A5) in Japanese subjects with uncontrolled essential hypertension."5.20Add-on effect of hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg in Japanese subjects with essential hypertension uncontrolled with losartan 50 mg and amlodipine 5 mg. ( Azuma, K; Fujita, KP; Nishida, C; Numaguchi, H; Rakugi, H; Shimada, K; Shirakawa, M; Tsuchihashi, T; Yamaguchi, H, 2015)
"Japanese patients with uncontrolled essential hypertension received single-blind losartan 50 mg/hydrochlorothiazide 12."5.20Efficacy and safety of fixed-dose losartan/hydrochlorothiazide/amlodipine combination versus losartan/hydrochlorothiazide combination in Japanese patients with essential hypertension. ( Azuma, K; Fujita, KP; Nishida, C; Numaguchi, H; Rakugi, H; Shimada, K; Shirakawa, M; Tsuchihashi, T; Yamaguchi, H, 2015)
"In patients who were previously uncontrolled on CCB monotherapy or untreated with grade 2 or 3 hypertension, single-pill combination indapamide SR/amlodipine reduced BP effectively--especially SBP--over 45 days, and was safe and well tolerated."5.19Blood pressure control with a single-pill combination of indapamide sustained-release and amlodipine in patients with hypertension: the EFFICIENT study. ( Gujral, VK; Hiremath, J; Jadhav, U; Namjoshi, DJ; Safar, M; Shamanna, P; Siraj, M; Tripathi, KK, 2014)
"The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of the FDC of azilsartan (AZI) and amlodipine besylate (AML) with those of AZI monotherapy and AML monotherapy in Japanese patients with grade 1 to 2 essential hypertension."5.19Evaluation of the efficacy and tolerability of fixed-dose combination therapy of azilsartan and amlodipine besylate in Japanese patients with grade I to II essential hypertension. ( Kagawa, T; Nakata, E; Rakugi, H; Sasaki, E, 2014)
"The objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy of the fixed-dose combination olmesartan/amlodipine 40/10 mg in patients with moderate essential hypertension not controlled on candesartan 32 mg."5.19Daytime systolic ambulatory blood pressure with a two-step switch from candesartan to olmesartan monotherapy and the fixed-dose combination of olmesartan/amlodipine in patients with uncontrolled essential hypertension (SEVICONTROL-2). ( Bramlage, P; Fimmers, R; Gansz, A; Lüders, S; Nadal, J; Schmieder, RE; Schrader, J; Sturm, CD; Zemmrich, C, 2014)
"Being safe, the fixed-dose lisinopril and amlodipine combination is effective in lowering blood pressure in patients with hypertensive disease (HD) concurrent with coronary heart disease (CHD) or atherosclerotic changes in the carotid artery."5.19[A fixed-dose lisinopril and amlodipine combination in conjunction with rosuvastatin in patients with hypertensive disease and coronary heart disease]. ( Galeeva, ZM; Galiavich, AS, 2014)
" In present study, we aimed to investigate the effects of valsartan as an angiotensin II receptor antagonist and amlodipine as a calcium channel blocker on the vWf levels and N/L ratio in patients with essential hypertension."5.17The comparative effects of valsartan and amlodipine on vWf levels and N/L ratio in patients with newly diagnosed hypertension. ( Arslan, Z; Balta, S; Bozoglu, E; Bulucu, F; Cakar, M; Celik, T; Demirbas, S; Demirkol, S; Karaman, M; Kocak, N; Kurt, O; Naharci, I; Sarlak, H; Seyit Ahmet, AY, 2013)
"To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of L-amlodipine besylate for blood pressure control in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension."5.17[The effectiveness and safety of L-amlodipine besylate for blood pressure control in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension]. ( Hu, DY; Jia, T; Yu, JM; Zhan, YQ; Zhang, LJ, 2013)
"Administering amlodipine in 2 divided doses was not associated with increased trough plasma amlodipine concentrations, reduced arterial stiffness, or improved BP control over a 24-hour period in patients with essential hypertension."5.17Effects of dividing amlodipine daily doses on trough drug concentrations and blood pressure control over a 24-hour period. ( Higaki, J; Irita, J; Masanori, J; Miyoshi, K; Nagao, T; Okura, T, 2013)
"A direct switch of candesartan to the fixed-dose combination olmesartan/amlodipine in uncontrolled hypertension is a frequent clinical requirement but is not covered by current labeling."5.17Daytime systolic ambulatory blood pressure with a direct switch between candesartan monotherapy and the fixed-dose combination olmesartan/amlodipine in patients with uncontrolled essential hypertension (SEVICONTROL-1). ( Bramlage, P; Fimmers, R; Gansz, A; Lüders, S; Nadal, J; Schmieder, RE; Schrader, J; Sturm, CD; Zemmrich, C, 2013)
" In this study, we investigated the effects of valsartan and amlodipine on the lipid profile in patients with newly diagnosed essential hypertension."5.17An additional LDL-lowering effect of amlodipine; not only an antihypertensive? ( Akhan, M; Arslan, E; Arslan, Z; Ay, SA; Balta, S; Bulucu, F; Cakar, M; Celik, T; Demirbas, S; Demirkol, S; Karaman, M; Saglam, K; Sarlak, H, 2013)
"The analysis will evaluate the efficiency and level of safeness of levamlodipine besylate combined treatment for essential hypertension."4.12Clinical assessment of levamlodipine besylate combination therapy for essential hypertension: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis. ( Dai, GY; Zhu, YH, 2022)
"Although amlodipine is recommended as the first-line therapy for the treatment of hypertension, its use is limited by its potential side effects."4.12Ambulatory blood pressure response to S-amlodipine in Korean adult patients with uncontrolled essential hypertension: A prospective, observational study. ( Ahn, JH; Ahn, KT; Choi, WG; Jung, IH; Kang, SH; Kim, DK; Kim, SS; Lee, JH; Lee, KH; Na, JO; Park, SD; Seo, J, 2022)
"These data suggest that lisinopril/lisinopril + hydrochlorothiazide, losartan/losartan + hydrochlorothiazide and valsartan/valsartan + hydrochlorothiazide alone or in combination with amlodipine are equally effective and well tolerated for the reduction of both systolic and diastolic blood pressure and improve arterial stiffness in patients with essential hypertension."3.91Effects of Different Antihypertensive Drug Combinations on Blood Pressure and Arterial Stiffness. ( Hebibovic, S; Jatic, Z; Rustempasic, E; Skopljak, A; Sukalo, A; Valjevac, A, 2019)
"We found that a fixed combination of perindopril/amlodipine is effective in controlling BP in patients with essential hypertension, with older age, male gender, and diabetes mellitus being independent risk factors for less BP control."3.83The Efficacy of Perindopril/Amlodipine in Reaching Blood Pressure Targets: Results of the CONTROL Study. ( Abdelhady, A; Albow, A; Khader, S; Sinnuqrut, S, 2016)
" We used pupillometry to evaluate the effects of the calcium channel blockers azelnidipine (AZ) and amlodipine (AM) on changes in autonomic nervous activity induced by isometric exercise in patients with hypertension."3.83Effects of azelnidipine and amlodipine on exercise-induced sympathoexcitation assessed by pupillometry in hypertensive patients. ( Hano, T; Iwane, N; Kawabe, T; Koike, Y; Nishihara, K, 2016)
"A total of 108 mild-to-moderate essential hypertension patients in Chinese Han nationality were treated with amlodipine for 8 weeks at a dosage of 5 mg/d."3.83[Association between gene polymorphism of calcium/calmodulin-dependent kinase 4 and efficacy of amlodipine in the treatment of hypertension in Chinese Han nationality]. ( Chen, Y; Liu, L; Liu, Y; Luo, Y; Yang, L; Yao, J; Zhong, G, 2016)
"to assess efficacy of a fixed combination of perindopril arginine and amlodipine besylate in the treatment of hypertensive patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) and signs of chronic kidney disease (CKD)."3.81[Therapy of Arterial Hypertension in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure and Signs of Chronic Kidney Disease With Fixed Perindopril/Amlodipine Combination]. ( Borovkov, NN; Borovkova, NJ; Kovaleva, GV; Kuznecova, TE, 2015)
"Aim of the METR study - to assess effect of antihypertensive therapy with fixed combination of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor lisinopril (10 mg) and calcium antagonist amlodipine (5 mg) on parameters of arterial wall stiffness and central hemodynamics in patients with stage I-II essential hypertension (EH) and functional class II-III ischemic heart disease."3.81[Stiffness of the Arterial Wall and Central Hemodynamics During Long-Term Combination Antihypertensive Therapy]. ( Glezer, MG; Prokofieva, EB, 2015)
"A European multi-center, prospective, 24-week, non-interventional study was conducted including 14,979 patients with essential hypertension and new treatment with olmesartan, amlodipine and hydrochlorothiazide as an FDC."3.80Clinical impact of patient adherence to a fixed-dose combination of olmesartan, amlodipine and hydrochlorothiazide. ( Bramlage, P; Fronk, EM; Ketelhut, R; Schmieder, RE; Smolnik, R; Wolf, WP; Zemmrich, C, 2014)
" There are no serious adverse event and no one discontinued medication due to adverse event."3.30Efficacy and safety of standard dose triple combination of telmisartan 80 mg/amlodipine 5 mg/chlorthalidone 25 mg in primary hypertension: A randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, multicenter phase 3 trial. ( Ahn, Y; Cha, KS; Chang, K; Cho, EJ; Choi, DJ; Choi, SY; Doh, JH; Hong, SJ; Hong, SP; Hwang, JY; Hyon, MS; Ihm, SH; Kang, WC; Kim, HS; Kim, MH; Kim, SH; Kim, WS; Kim, YH; Kwon, K; Lee, JH; Lee, N; Lim, SW; Rhee, MY; Shin, J; Son, JW; Yoo, BS, 2023)
" During follow-up, the OA dosage is adjusted according to the ABPM and OBPM results."3.30The effects of Olmesartan/amlodipine administered in the Morning or At Night on nocturnal blood pressure reduction in Chinese patients with mild-moderate essential hypertension (OMAN Trial): study protocol for a prospective, multicenter, randomized, open- ( Chen, X; Jia, S; Li, X; Liao, H; Liu, K; Liu, X; Meng, Q; Shi, R; Sun, L; Wang, S; Wang, Z; Xu, M; Ye, R; Zhang, X; Zhang, Z, 2023)
"Most adverse events (AEs) were mild or moderate in intensity, and no deaths or treatment-related serious AEs were reported."2.87A phase III, open-label, multicenter study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of long-term triple combination therapy with azilsartan, amlodipine, and hydrochlorothiazide in patients with essential hypertension. ( Nishiyama, Y; Rakugi, H; Sano, Y; Shimizu, K; Umeda, Y, 2018)
" The adverse events (AEs) during both treatment periods were generally mild."2.84The efficacy and long-term safety of a triple combination of 80 mg telmisartan, 5 mg amlodipine and 12.5 mg hydrochlorothiazide in Japanese patients with essential hypertension: a randomized, double-blind study with open-label extension. ( Higaki, J; Ikeda, H; Komuro, I; Kuroki, D; Nishimura, S; Ogihara, T; Shiki, K; Taniguchi, A; Ugai, H, 2017)
" Both treatment regimens were well tolerated regarding adverse events or laboratory testing."2.84Blood pressure-lowering efficacy and safety of perindopril/indapamide/amlodipine single-pill combination in patients with uncontrolled essential hypertension: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. ( Amodeo, C; Asmar, R; Brzozowska-Villatte, R; de Champvallins, M; Mourad, JJ, 2017)
"The current study addresses the 24-h antihypertensive efficacy and safety of arotinolol combined with a different calcium channel blocker."2.79The efficacy and safety of arotinolol combined with a different calcium channel blocker in the treatment of Chinese patients with essential hypertension: a one-year follow-up study. ( Chen, W; Fang, H; Liu, X; Xu, W, 2014)
" There were no differences between 4 dosing regimens in laboratory and clinical parameters of safety and tolerability."2.79[Fixed irbesartan/amlodipine combination: efficacy and safety of the use of four dosing regimens in patients with arterial hypertension]. ( Kobalava, ZhD, 2014)
" Population pharmacokinetic analyses were performed on data which were collected prospectively from 60 Chinese patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension [age range 40-74 years, males (n = 31), females (n = 29)] receiving oral racemic amlodipine for 4 weeks."2.79ABCB1 polymorphism and gender affect the pharmacokinetics of amlodipine in Chinese patients with essential hypertension: a population analysis. ( Barrett, JS; Guo, CX; Hua, Y; Huang, ZJ; Pei, Q; Wang, JL; Yang, GP; Yuan, H; Zhang, WL; Zhou, HH; Zuo, XC, 2014)
" Serious adverse events (SAEs) and unexpected adverse events (UAEs) occurred in 0."1.56Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of a Single-Pill Combination of Olmesartan/Amlodipine/Hydrochlorothiazide in Korean Patients with Essential Hypertension (RESOLVE): A Large, Observational, Retrospective, Cohort Study. ( Park, SJ; Rhee, SJ, 2020)
"To evaluate, in patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertension, the effects of 6 months treatment with canagliflozin, or perindopril, an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, on central BP and carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV)."1.51Diabetic patients with essential hypertension treated with amlodipine: blood pressure and arterial stiffness effects of canagliflozin or perindopril. ( Ramirez, AJ; Sanchez, MJ; Sanchez, RA, 2019)
"Treatment with amlodipine, candesartan, or indapamide did not significantly affect plasma visfatin levels."1.43Effects of antihypertensive treatment on plasma apelin, resistin, and visfatin concentrations. ( Piecha, G; Skoczylas, A; Więcek, A, 2016)

Research

Studies (62)

TimeframeStudies, this research(%)All Research%
pre-19900 (0.00)18.7374
1990's0 (0.00)18.2507
2000's0 (0.00)29.6817
2010's47 (75.81)24.3611
2020's15 (24.19)2.80

Authors

AuthorsStudies
Sarkar, G1
Gaikwad, VB1
Sharma, A2
Halder, SK1
Kumar, DA1
Anand, J1
Agrawal, S1
Kumbhar, A1
Kinholkar, B1
Mathur, R1
Doshi, M1
Bachani, D1
Mehta, S1
Kim, DK1
Ahn, JH2
Lee, KH1
Kang, SH1
Kim, SS1
Na, JO1
Park, SD1
Ahn, KT1
Lee, JH3
Jung, IH1
Seo, J1
Choi, WG1
Dai, GY1
Zhu, YH1
Sung, KC4
Sung, JH1
Cho, EJ4
Ahn, JC2
Han, SH1
Kim, W2
Kim, KH3
Sohn, IS2
Shin, J3
Kim, SY3
Kim, KI2
Kang, SM1
Park, SJ2
Kim, YJ3
Shin, JH2
Park, SM4
Park, CG1
Honda, A1
Tahara, N1
Tahara, A1
Bekki, M1
Maeda-Ogata, S1
Sugiyama, Y2
Igata, S1
Nishino, Y1
Matsui, T1
Kurata, S1
Abe, T1
Yamagishi, SI1
Fukumoto, Y1
Wang, H1
Xi, Y1
Chen, Y2
Wang, L1
Yang, F1
Lu, X1
Sun, N1
Kim, MC1
Ahn, Y3
Kim, MH3
Hong, TJ4
Rhee, MY5
Kim, SH3
Hong, SJ3
Kim, H1
Chae, IH2
Kang, DH1
Kim, BK1
Kim, HS3
Xie, M1
Tang, T1
Liang, H1
Kim, YH1
Chang, K1
Choi, DJ2
Kang, WC1
Lee, N1
Son, JW2
Doh, JH1
Kim, WS3
Lim, SW1
Hong, SP1
Choi, SY1
Hyon, MS3
Hwang, JY1
Kwon, K1
Cha, KS2
Ihm, SH3
Yoo, BS6
Yuan, W1
Fan, H1
Yang, H1
Tang, L1
Liu, Z1
Ouyang, F1
Luo, W1
Yan, Y1
Xu, M1
Zhang, X1
Ye, R1
Liu, X2
Sun, L1
Jia, S1
Zhang, Z1
Li, X1
Wang, Z1
Liao, H1
Shi, R2
Liu, K2
Wang, S1
Meng, Q1
Chen, X2
Jatic, Z1
Skopljak, A1
Hebibovic, S1
Sukalo, A1
Rustempasic, E1
Valjevac, A1
Ohta, Y1
Kamide, K1
Hanada, H1
Morimoto, S1
Nakahashi, T1
Takiuchi, S1
Ishimitsu, T1
Tsuchihashi, T3
Soma, M1
Tomohiro Katsuya, T1
Sugimoto, K1
Rakugi, H6
Oukura, T1
Higaki, J3
Matsuura, H1
Shinagawa, T1
Miwa, Y1
Sasaguri, T1
Igase, M1
Miki, T1
Takeda, K1
Higashiura, K1
Shimamoto, K1
Katabuchi, R1
Ueno, M1
Hosomi, N1
Kato, J1
Komai, N1
Kojima, S1
Sase, K1
Iwashima, Y1
Yoshihara, F1
Horio, T1
Nakamura, S1
Nakahama, H1
Miyata, T1
Kawano, Y1
Niushko, TY1
Tarasiuk, OK1
Sikalo, YK1
Lee, JW1
Choi, E1
Youn, YJ1
Ahn, SG1
Ahn, MS1
Kim, JY1
Lee, SH1
Yoon, J1
Ryu, DR2
Hong, KS1
Rhee, SJ1
Zhang, ZL2
Zhu, MM1
Li, HL2
Shi, LH1
Chen, XP2
Luo, J1
Zhao, JF1
Kim, CJ1
Ahn, T2
Youn, HJ3
Jeon, HK1
Chung, WB1
Chae, SC2
Nam, CW3
Choi, JY2
Kim, YK1
Lee, HY3
Cho, JH1
Shin, ES2
Yoon, JH1
Yang, TH2
Jeong, MH1
Park, JI1
Choi, KJ1
Cha, DH2
Jung, HO1
Choi, JH1
Lee, KJ1
Park, TH1
Oh, JH1
Kim, SM1
Shim, J1
Choi, SW1
Park, DG1
Song, PS1
Rha, SW2
Park, SW1
Hosaka, M1
Inoue, R1
Satoh, M1
Watabe, D1
Hanazawa, T1
Ohkubo, T1
Asayama, K1
Obara, T1
Imai, Y1
Shimizu, K2
Nishiyama, Y2
Sano, Y2
Umeda, Y1
Kinugawa, Y1
Terashio, S1
Oh, YS1
Won, KH1
Yoo, KD1
Ahn, YK1
Jang, JY1
Cho, SK1
Park, SH1
Song, JM1
Jeong, JO3
Yoon, YW1
Kim, BS1
Cho, DK1
Choi, YJ1
Jeon, DW1
Ramirez, AJ1
Sanchez, MJ1
Sanchez, RA1
Imaizumi, S1
Shiga, Y1
Ogawa, M1
Sako, H1
Nagata, Y1
Matsunaga, A1
Shirotani, T1
Hoshino, F1
Yahiro, E1
Uehara, Y1
Morito, N1
Tanigawa, H1
Shimono, D1
Fukushima, M1
Sugihara, H1
Norimatsu, K1
Kusumoto, T1
Saku, K1
Miura, SI1
Dominiczak, AF1
de Champvallins, M2
Brzozowska-Villatte, R2
Asmar, R2
Hiremath, JS1
Chokalingam, K1
Mathan, G1
Reddy, PNC1
Dhawan, S1
Toppo, A1
Jia, T1
Zhang, LJ1
Zhan, YQ1
Yu, JM1
Hu, DY1
Miyoshi, K1
Okura, T1
Nagao, T1
Masanori, J1
Irita, J1
Zemmrich, C3
Lüders, S2
Gansz, A2
Sturm, CD2
Fimmers, R2
Nadal, J2
Schmieder, RE3
Schrader, J2
Bramlage, P3
Zuo, XC1
Zhang, WL1
Yuan, H1
Barrett, JS1
Hua, Y1
Huang, ZJ1
Zhou, HH1
Pei, Q1
Guo, CX1
Wang, JL1
Yang, GP2
Fang, H1
Chen, W1
Xu, W1
Jadhav, U1
Hiremath, J1
Namjoshi, DJ1
Gujral, VK1
Tripathi, KK1
Siraj, M1
Shamanna, P1
Safar, M1
Ketelhut, R1
Fronk, EM1
Wolf, WP1
Smolnik, R1
Nakata, E1
Sasaki, E1
Kagawa, T1
Inomata, J1
Murai, H1
Kaneko, S1
Hamaoka, T1
Ikeda, T1
Kobayashi, D1
Usui, S1
Furusho, H1
Takata, S1
Takamura, M1
Kobalava, ZhD1
Ripley, DP1
Negrou, K1
Oliver, JJ1
Worthy, G1
Struthers, AD1
Plein, S1
Greenwood, JP1
Shimada, K2
Numaguchi, H2
Nishida, C2
Yamaguchi, H2
Shirakawa, M2
Azuma, K2
Fujita, KP2
Celık, T3
Balta, S3
Karaman, M3
Ahmet Ay, S1
Demırkol, S3
Ozturk, C1
Dınc, M1
Unal, HU1
Yılmaz, MI1
Kılıc, S1
Kurt, G1
Tas, A1
Iyısoy, A1
Quartı-Trevano, F1
Fıcı, F1
Grassı, G1
Galeeva, ZM1
Galiavich, AS1
Hiltunen, TP1
Donner, KM1
Sarin, AP1
Saarela, J1
Ripatti, S1
Chapman, AB1
Gums, JG1
Gong, Y1
Cooper-DeHoff, RM1
Frau, F1
Glorioso, V1
Zaninello, R1
Salvi, E1
Glorioso, N1
Boerwinkle, E1
Turner, ST1
Johnson, JA1
Kontula, KK1
Czarnecka, D1
Koch, EM1
Gottwald-Hostalek, U1
Chull Chae, S1
Seog Seo, H1
Kim, KS1
Kim, JJ2
Chun, KJ2
Park, JS1
Oh, SK1
Kim, DS2
Kwan, J1
Bae Park, J1
Han, KR1
Kim, DI1
Joo, SJ2
Jeon, ES1
Prokofieva, EB1
Glezer, MG1
Borovkova, NJ1
Kuznecova, TE1
Borovkov, NN1
Kovaleva, GV1
Wen, ZP1
Zhang, W1
Hu, D1
Sun, Y1
Liao, Y1
Huang, J1
Zhao, R1
Yang, K1
Abdelhady, A1
Khader, S1
Sinnuqrut, S1
Albow, A1
Redon, J1
Pichler, G1
Skoczylas, A1
Piecha, G1
Więcek, A1
Nádházi, Z1
Dézsi, CA1
Koike, Y1
Kawabe, T1
Nishihara, K1
Iwane, N1
Hano, T1
Shin, MS1
Seo, HS1
Park, S1
Il Kim, D1
Kim, CH1
Komuro, I1
Shiki, K1
Ugai, H1
Taniguchi, A1
Ikeda, H1
Kuroki, D1
Nishimura, S1
Ogihara, T1
Zhong, G1
Liu, L1
Liu, Y1
Yang, L1
Luo, Y1
Yao, J1
Shi, D1
Liu, Q1
Mourad, JJ1
Amodeo, C1
Arslan, Z2
Ay, SA1
Cakar, M2
Akhan, M1
Sarlak, H2
Arslan, E1
Demirbas, S2
Bulucu, F2
Saglam, K1
Seyit Ahmet, AY1
Naharci, I1
Kurt, O1
Kocak, N1
Bozoglu, E1

Clinical Trials (10)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel, Multi-Center, Phase 2 Clinical Trial to Determine the Optimal Dose of AD-209 in Patients With Essential Hypertension[NCT04218552]Phase 2176 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-02-25Completed
A Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Phase II Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Combination Therapy vs. Monotherapy of Candesartan and Amlodipine for Dose-Finding in Patients With Essential Hypertension[NCT02944734]Phase 2392 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-09-30Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Co-administered HGP0904, HGP0608 and HGP0816 in Patients With Hypertension and Dyslipidemia: A Randomized, Double-blind, Multicenter, Phase 3 Study[NCT02899455]Phase 3146 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-07-31Completed
A Phase 3, Open-label, Multicenter, Long-term Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of TAK-536, Amlodipine and Hydrochlorothiazide in Subjects With Essential Hypertension[NCT02277691]Phase 3341 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-11-07Completed
Randomized, Double-Blind, Multi-Center, Phase 3 Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Telmisartan/Amlodipine/Hydrochlorothiazide Combination in Comparison With Telmisartan/Amlodipine Combination for Essential Hypertension Patients Not Controlled by[NCT02738632]Phase 3300 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-05-31Completed
A Phase III, Randomized, Active-Comparator Controlled Clinical Trial to Study the Efficacy and Safety of MK-0954E in Japanese Patients With Essential Hypertension Uncontrolled With Losartan and Amlodipine Co-administration[NCT01302691]Phase 3327 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-01-01Completed
A Phase III, Randomized, Active-Comparator Controlled Clinical Trial to Study the Efficacy and Safety of MK-0954E in Japanese Patients With Essential Hypertension Uncontrolled With MK-954H (L50/H12.5 mg) [PREMINENT®] and an Open-label, Long-term Clinical [NCT01299376]Phase 3286 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-01-24Completed
A Randomised Double-blind Cross-over Single-centre Study on Molecular Genetics of Drug Responsiveness in Essential Hypertension[NCT03276598]Phase 4233 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-11-25Completed
[NCT01518998]Phase 2420 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-08-31Completed
A Randomized, Double-blind Multicenter, Phase III Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Combination of Fimasartan/Amlodipine Versus Fimasartan Monotherapy in Patients With Essential Hypertension Who Fail to Respond Adequately to Fimasartan Monother[NCT02152306]Phase 3143 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-04-30Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

Change From Baseline in Home Sitting Clinic Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure at Each Visit

The change in home morning SPB and DBP measured at End of Week 12, End of Treatment (Up to Week 52) relative to baseline. (NCT02277691)
Timeframe: Baseline (End of Run-in Period, Week 0), End of Week 12 and End of Treatment (Up to Week 52)

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Change at End of Week 12, Morning SBPChange at EOT (Up to Week 52), Morning SBPChange at End of Week 12, Morning DBPChange at EOT (Up to Week 52), Morning DBP
TAK-536TCH-13.9-12.4-7.9-6.9

Change From Baseline in Office Trough Sitting Clinic Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure at Each Visit

The change in office trough SBP and DBP measured at Weeks 12 last observation was carried forward (LOCF) and 52 (LOCF) relative to baseline. Sitting blood pressure was measured at least 3 times. Each measurement session ended once blood pressure was found stable at 2 consecutive measurements. The average of the last 2 measurements of office sitting blood pressure was used. (NCT02277691)
Timeframe: Baseline (End of Run-in Period, Week 0) and Weeks 12 (LOCF) and 52 (LOCF)

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Change at Week 12 (LOCF), SBPChange at Week 52 (LOCF), SBPChange at Week 12 (LOCF), DBPChange at Week 52 (LOCF), DBP
TAK-536TCH-14.4-13.9-8.6-8.3

Number of Participants Who Experience at Least One Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, a clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug, whether or not it is considered related to the drug. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) is defined as an adverse event with an onset that occurs after receiving study drug. A Serious Adverse Event (SAE) A serious is any experience that suggests a significant hazard, contraindication, side effect or precaution that: results in death, is life-threatening, required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is medically significant. (NCT02277691)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 52

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
TEAEsSAEs
TAK-536TCH28920

Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Tests

The number of participants with any markedly abnormal clinical laboratory test values collected throughout study. RBC = Red blood cells, ALT = alanine aminotransferase, AST = aspartate aminotransferase, GGT = gamma-glutamyl transferase, LLN = lower limit of normal or lower reference limit, ULN = upper limit of normal or upper reference limit. Laboratory vallues were considered abnormal if they were beyond the values defined in categories. (NCT02277691)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 52

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
RBC (< 0.8×LLN×10^6cells/μL)Hemoglobin (<0.8 × LLN g/dL)Hematocrit (<0.8 × LLN Percent)ALT (>3 × ULN U/L)AST (>3 × ULN U/L)Total Bilirubin (>2.0 mg/dL)Creatinine (>2.0 mg/dL)Blood Urea Nitrogen (>30 mg/dL)GGT (>3 × ULN U/L)Eosinophils (>2 × ULN×10^3cells/μL)Uric Acid (>13.0 mg/dL)Total Cholesterol (>300 mg/dL)Triglycerides (>2.5 × ULN mg/dL)Potassium (<3.0 mEq/L)Sodium (<130 mEq/L)
TAK-536TCH522442120144122933

Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Vital Signs Values

Vital signs included supine and standing systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP) respectively and office sitting pulse. Vital signs were considered abnormal if they were beyond the values defined in categories. (NCT02277691)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 52

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
SBP (Supine) (>180mmHg)SBP (Standing) (<85mmHg)SBP (Standing) (>180mmHg)DBP (Supine) (<50mmHg)DBP (Standing) (>110mmHg)Office, Sitting Pulse (<50bpm)
TAK-536TCH1132410

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Related to Body Weight

Reported TEAE is categorized into investigations System Organ Class (SOC) related to body weight. (NCT02277691)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 52

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Weight decreasedWeight increased
TAK-536TCH22

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Related to Electrocardiogram (ECG)

Reported TEAE is categorized into cardiac disorders and investigations system organ class (SOC) related to ECG. (NCT02277691)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 52

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Atrial fibrillationSinus bradycardiaQRS axis abnormal
TAK-536TCH311

Change in Mean Trough Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (SiDBP)

Sitting diastolic blood pressure was measured by automated sphygmomanometer pre-dose on Day 1 (baseline) and at 24 ± 2 hours after the last study drug administration at Week 8. The difference between the baseline and Week 8 assessments was calculated and summarized by treatment arm. (NCT01302691)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
L50/H12.5/A5-9.1
L50 + A5-8.0

Change in Mean Trough Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure (SiSBP)

Sitting systolic blood pressure was measured by automated sphygmomanometer pre-dose on Day 1 (baseline) and at 24 ± 2 hours after the last study drug administration at Week 8. The difference between the baseline and Week 8 assessments was calculated and summarized by treatment arm. (NCT01302691)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
L50/H12.5/A5-13.4
L50 + A5-10.2

Percentage of Participants Who Experience ≥1 Adverse Event (AE)

An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the product, whether or not considered related to the use of the product. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition which was temporally associated with the use of the product, was also an AE. The percentage of participants who experienced at least 1 AE during the 10-week treatment and follow-up period were summarized by study drug received. (NCT01302691)
Timeframe: up to 14 days after last dose of study drug (up to 10 weeks)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
L50/H12.5/A530.5
L50 + A528.8

Percentage of Participants Who Experience ≥1 Drug-related AE

An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the product, whether or not considered related to the use of the product. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition which was temporally associated with the use of the product, was also an AE. Percentage of participants that experienced at least 1 AE that was reported as possibly, probably, or definitely related to the study drug by the investigator during the 10-week treatment and follow-up period were summarized by study drug received. (NCT01302691)
Timeframe: up to 14 days after last dose of study drug (up to 10 weeks)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
L50/H12.5/A511.6
L50 + A53.7

Percentage of Participants Who Experience ≥1 Drug-related SAE

An SAE is any AE occurring at any dose or during any use of Sponsor's product that does the following: results in death; is life threatening; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; results in or prolongs an existing inpatient hospitalization; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; is a cancer; is associated with an overdose; is another important medical event. Percentage of participants that experienced at least 1 SAE that was reported as possibly, probably, or definitely related to the study drug by the investigator during the 10-week treatment and follow-up period were summarized by study drug received (NCT01302691)
Timeframe: up to 14 days after last dose of study drug (up to 10 weeks)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
L50/H12.5/A50.0
L50 + A50.0

Percentage of Participants Who Experience ≥1 Serious Adverse Event (SAE)

An SAE is any AE occurring at any dose or during any use of Sponsor's product that does the following: results in death; is life threatening; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; results in or prolongs an existing inpatient hospitalization; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; is a cancer; is associated with an overdose; is another important medical event. The percentage of participants who experienced at least 1 SAE during the 10-week treatment and follow-up period were summarized by study drug received. (NCT01302691)
Timeframe: up to 14 days after last dose of study drug (up to 10 weeks)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
L50/H12.5/A50.6
L50 + A50.6

Percentage of Participants Who Had Study Drug Stopped Due to an AE

An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the product, whether or not considered related to the use of the product. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition which was temporally associated with the use of the product, was also an AE. The percentage of participants who had study drug stopped during the 8-week treatment period due to an AE regardless of whether or not they completed the study was summarized by treatment arm (NCT01302691)
Timeframe: up to 8 weeks

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
L50/H12.5/A51.2
L50 + A50.0

Change in Trough Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (SiDBP)-Double-Blind Treatment Period

Sitting diastolic blood pressure was measured by automated sphygmomanometer pre-dose on Day 1 (baseline) and at 24 ± 2 hours after the last study drug administration at Week 8. The difference between the baseline and Week 8 assessments was calculated and summarized by treatment arm. (NCT01299376)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
L50/H12.5/A5-12.1
L50/H12.5-6.2

Change in Trough Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure (SiSBP)-Double-Blind Treatment Period

Sitting systolic blood pressure was measured by automated sphygmomanometer pre-dose on Day 1 (baseline) and at 24 ± 2 hours after the last study drug administration at Week 8. (NCT01299376)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
L50/H12.5/A5-17.7
L50/H12.5-7.5

Percentage of Participants Who Experience 1 or More Adverse Events (AEs)- Double-Blind Treatment Period

An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the product, whether or not considered related to the use of the product. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition which was temporally associated with the use of the product, was also an AE. The percentage of participants who experienced at least 1 AE during the 8-week double-blind treatment period were summarized by study drug received. (NCT01299376)
Timeframe: up to Week 8

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
L50/H12.5/A527.0
L50/H12.529.7

Percentage of Participants Who Experience 1 or More Adverse Events (AEs)- Long Term

An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the product, whether or not considered related to the use of the product. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition which was temporally associated with the use of the product, was also an AE. The percentage of participants that experienced at least 1 AE during long-term period was summarized. (NCT01299376)
Timeframe: Week 9 up to Week 52 for L50/H12.5→L50/H12.5/A5 arm; Week 1 to Week 52 for L50/H12.5/A5→L50/H12.5/A5

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
L50/H12.5/A5→L50/H12.5/A570.9
L50/H12.5→L50/H12.5/A566.2

Percentage of Participants Who Experience 1 or More Drug-Related AEs- Double-Blind Treatment Period

An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the product, whether or not considered related to the use of the product. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition which was temporally associated with the use of the product, was also an AE. Percentage of participants that experienced at least 1 AE that was reported as possibly, probably, or definitely related to the study drug by the investigator during the 8-week double-blind treatment period were summarized by study drug received. (NCT01299376)
Timeframe: up to Week 8

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
L50/H12.5/A512.1
L50/H12.514.5

Percentage of Participants Who Experience 1 or More Drug-related AEs- Long Term

An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the product, whether or not considered related to the use of the product. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition which was temporally associated with the use of the product, was also an AE. Percentage of participants that experienced at least 1 AE that was reported as possibly, probably, or definitely related to the study drug by the investigator during the long-term reporting period was summarized. (NCT01299376)
Timeframe: Week 9 up to Week 52 for L50/H12.5→L50/H12.5/A5 arm; Week 1 to Week 52 for L50/H12.5/A5→L50/H12.5/A5

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
L50/H12.5/A5→L50/H12.5/A527.7
L50/H12.5→L50/H12.5/A514.3

Percentage of Participants Who Experience 1 or More Drug-related SAEs- Long Term

An SAE is any AE occurring at any dose or during any use of Sponsor's product that does the following: results in death; is life threatening; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; results in or prolongs an existing inpatient hospitalization; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; is a cancer; is associated with an overdose; is another important medical event. the percentage of participants that experienced an SAE that assessed as possibly, probably, or definitely related to the study drug by the investigator was summarized. (NCT01299376)
Timeframe: Week 9 up to Week 52 for L50/H12.5→L50/H12.5/A5 arm; Week 1 to Week 52 for L50/H12.5/A5→L50/H12.5/A5

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
L50/H12.5/A5→L50/H12.5/A50.0
L50/H12.5→L50/H12.5/A50.8

Percentage of Participants Who Experience 1 or More Drug-Related Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)- Double-Blind Treatment Period

An SAE is any AE occurring at any dose or during any use of Sponsor's product that does the following: results in death; is life threatening; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; results in or prolongs an existing inpatient hospitalization; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; is a cancer; is associated with an overdose; is another important medical event. Percentage of participants that experienced at least 1 SAE that was reported as possibly, probably, or definitely related to the study drug by the investigator during the 8-week double-blind treatment period were summarized by study drug received. (NCT01299376)
Timeframe: up to Week 8

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
L50/H12.5/A50.0
L50/H12.50.0

Percentage of Participants Who Experience 1 or More SAEs- Long Term

An SAE is any AE occurring at any dose or during any use of Sponsor's product that does the following: results in death; is life threatening; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; results in or prolongs an existing inpatient hospitalization; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; is a cancer; is associated with an overdose; is another important medical event. Those SAEs assessed as possibly, probably, or definitely related to the study drug during the long-term period were summarized. (NCT01299376)
Timeframe: Week 9 up to Week 52 for L50/H12.5→L50/H12.5/A5 arm; Week 1 to Week 52 for L50/H12.5/A5→L50/H12.5/A5

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
L50/H12.5/A5→L50/H12.5/A52.1
L50/H12.5→L50/H12.5/A53.0

Percentage of Participants Who Experience 1 or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)- Double-Blind Treatment Period

An SAE is any AE occurring at any dose or during any use of Sponsor's product that does the following: results in death; is life threatening; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; results in or prolongs an existing inpatient hospitalization; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; is a cancer; is associated with an overdose; is another important medical event. The percentage of participants who experienced at least 1 SAE during the 8-week double-blind treatment period were summarized by study drug received. (NCT01299376)
Timeframe: up to Week 8

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
L50/H12.5/A50.7
L50/H12.51.4

Percentage of Participants Who Had Study Drug Discontinued Due to an AE - Double Blind Treatment Period

An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the product, whether or not considered related to the use of the product. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition which was temporally associated with the use of the product, was also an AE. The percentage of participants who had study drug stopped during the 8-week double-blind treatment period due to an AE regardless of whether or not they completed the study was summarized by treatment arm. (NCT01299376)
Timeframe: up to Week 8

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
L50/H12.5/A50.7
L50/H12.51.4

Percentage of Participants Who Had Study Drug Discontinued From the Study Due to an AE- Long Term

An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the product, whether or not considered related to the use of the product. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition which was temporally associated with the use of the product, was also an AE. The percentage of participants who had study drug discontinued during the 44 week extension due to an AE regardless of completion status were summarized. (NCT01299376)
Timeframe: Week 9 up to Week 52 for L50/H12.5→L50/H12.5/A5 arm; Week 1 to Week 52 for L50/H12.5/A5→L50/H12.5/A5

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
L50/H12.5/A5→L50/H12.5/A52.1
L50/H12.5→L50/H12.5/A52.3

Reviews

2 reviews available for amlodipine and Essential Hypertension

ArticleYear
Efficacy of single-pill combination in uncontrolled essential hypertension: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
    Clinical cardiology, 2023, Volume: 46, Issue:8

    Topics: Amlodipine; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihyperten

2023
The Results of ACES (Antihypertensive Combinations' Long Term Efficacy Comparing Study): Analysis of Metabolic Effects of Antihypertensive Combination Therapies.
    Clinical drug investigation, 2016, Volume: 36, Issue:10

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Calcium Channel

2016

Trials

44 trials available for amlodipine and Essential Hypertension

ArticleYear
Fixed-dose Combination of Metoprolol, Telmisartan, and Chlorthalidone for Essential Hypertension in Adults with Stable Coronary Artery Disease: Phase III Study.
    Advances in therapy, 2022, Volume: 39, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Chlorthalidone; Coronary Artery Disease;

2022
Efficacy and safety of low-dose antihypertensive combination of amlodipine, telmisartan, and chlorthalidone: A randomized, double-blind, parallel, phase II trial.
    Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2022, Volume: 24, Issue:10

    Topics: Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Chlorthalidone; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combi

2022
Effects of olmesartan and amlodipine on blood pressure, endothelial function, and vascular inflammation.
    Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2023, Volume: 30, Issue:4

    Topics: Aged; Amlodipine; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihy

2023
Efficacy of Allisartan Isoproxil in the Treatment of Mild-to-Moderate Essential Hypertension.
    American journal of hypertension, 2023, 09-15, Volume: 36, Issue:10

    Topics: Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Double-Blind Method; Essential Hypertension; Hu

2023
A Randomized, Multicenter, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of a Quadruple Combination of Amlodipine, Losartan, Rosuvastatin, and Ezetimibe in Patients with Concomitant Essential Hypertension and Dyslipidemia.
    American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions, 2023, Volume: 23, Issue:4

    Topics: Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Cholesterol, LDL; Double-Blind Method; Dyslipid

2023
Efficacy and safety of standard dose triple combination of telmisartan 80 mg/amlodipine 5 mg/chlorthalidone 25 mg in primary hypertension: A randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, multicenter phase 3 trial.
    Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2023, Volume: 25, Issue:9

    Topics: Aged; Amlodipine; Chlorthalidone; Essential Hypertension; Female; Humans; Hypertension; Leukemia, My

2023
Effect and mechanism of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor on the improvement of elderly essential hypertension-induced vascular endothelial function impairment based on the JAK/STAT pathway.
    Diagnostic pathology, 2023, Sep-28, Volume: 18, Issue:1

    Topics: Aged; Amlodipine; Animals; Atorvastatin; Essential Hypertension; Humans; Hydroxymethylglutaryl CoA R

2023
The effects of Olmesartan/amlodipine administered in the Morning or At Night on nocturnal blood pressure reduction in Chinese patients with mild-moderate essential hypertension (OMAN Trial): study protocol for a prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-
    Trials, 2023, Nov-28, Volume: 24, Issue:1

    Topics: Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory; Circadia

2023
Genetic factors associated with elevation of uric acid after treatment with thiazide-like diuretic in patients with essential hypertension.
    Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2020, Volume: 43, Issue:3

    Topics: Aged; Amlodipine; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Blood Pressure; Calcium Channel Blockers; Cross-

2020
Comparison of Blood Pressure Variability Between Losartan and Amlodipine in Essential Hypertension (COMPAS-BPV).
    American journal of hypertension, 2020, 08-04, Volume: 33, Issue:8

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Drug Therapy, Combination; Essenti

2020
Efficacy and Tolerability of Combination Therapy Versus Monotherapy with Candesartan and/or Amlodipine for Dose Finding in Essential Hypertension: A Phase II Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind Clinical Trial.
    Clinical therapeutics, 2017, Volume: 39, Issue:8

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Blood Pressure

2017
A Randomized, Multicenter, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and the Tolerability of a Triple Combination of Amlodipine/Losartan/Rosuvastatin in Patients With Comorbid Essential Hypertension and Hyperlipidemia.
    Clinical therapeutics, 2017, Volume: 39, Issue:12

    Topics: Aged; Amlodipine; Anticholesteremic Agents; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Comorbidity; Do

2017
Effect of amlodipine, efonidipine, and trichlormethiazide on home blood pressure and upper-normal microalbuminuria assessed by casual spot urine test in essential hypertensive patients.
    Clinical and experimental hypertension (New York, N.Y. : 1993), 2018, Volume: 40, Issue:5

    Topics: Aged; Albuminuria; Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Biphenyl Compounds; Blood Pressure; Blood Pr

2018
A phase III, open-label, multicenter study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of long-term triple combination therapy with azilsartan, amlodipine, and hydrochlorothiazide in patients with essential hypertension.
    Blood pressure, 2018, Volume: 27, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Amlodipine; Benzimidazoles; Blood Pressure; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy,

2018
Effects of triple combination therapy with azilsartan/amlodipine/hydrochlorothiazide on office/home blood pressure: a randomized-controlled trial in Japanese essential hypertensive patients.
    Blood pressure monitoring, 2018, Volume: 23, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged; Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Blood Pressure; Double-Blind Method; Drug

2018
Efficacy and Tolerability of Telmisartan/Amlodipine + Hydrochlorothiazide Versus Telmisartan/Amlodipine Combination Therapy for Essential Hypertension Uncontrolled With Telmisartan/Amlodipine: The Phase III, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind TAHYTI St
    Clinical therapeutics, 2018, Volume: 40, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Benzoates; Blood Pressure; Dizzine

2018
Randomized trial of an increased dose of calcium channel blocker or angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker as an add-on intensive depressor therapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with uncontrolled essential hypertension: the ACADEMIE Study.
    Heart and vessels, 2019, Volume: 34, Issue:4

    Topics: Aged; Amlodipine; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Blood Pressure; Blood Pressure Monitoring

2019
Efficacy of a new single-pill combination of a thiazide-like diuretic and a calcium channel blocker (indapamide sustained release/amlodipine) in essential hypertension.
    Journal of hypertension, 2019, Volume: 37, Issue:11

    Topics: Aged; Amlodipine; Amlodipine, Valsartan Drug Combination; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; B

2019
A Randomized, Double-blinded, Controlled, Multicentre Phase III Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Telmisartan /Amlodipine/Hydrochlorothiazide Compared to Telmisartan/Hydrochlorothiazide in Patients with Essential Hypertension.
    The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India, 2018, Volume: 66, Issue:12

    Topics: Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy, Combination; Essential Hyperte

2018
[The effectiveness and safety of L-amlodipine besylate for blood pressure control in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension].
    Zhonghua xin xue guan bing za zhi, 2013, Volume: 41, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Essential Hypertension; Female; Humans; Hypertensi

2013
Effects of dividing amlodipine daily doses on trough drug concentrations and blood pressure control over a 24-hour period.
    Clinical therapeutics, 2013, Volume: 35, Issue:9

    Topics: Aged; Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory; Cr

2013
Daytime systolic ambulatory blood pressure with a direct switch between candesartan monotherapy and the fixed-dose combination olmesartan/amlodipine in patients with uncontrolled essential hypertension (SEVICONTROL-1).
    Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2013, Volume: 15, Issue:11

    Topics: Aged; Amlodipine; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Bipheny

2013
Daytime systolic ambulatory blood pressure with a two-step switch from candesartan to olmesartan monotherapy and the fixed-dose combination of olmesartan/amlodipine in patients with uncontrolled essential hypertension (SEVICONTROL-2).
    Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2014, Volume: 16, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Blood Pressure

2014
ABCB1 polymorphism and gender affect the pharmacokinetics of amlodipine in Chinese patients with essential hypertension: a population analysis.
    Drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics, 2014, Volume: 29, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Amlodipine; Asian People; ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B; Blood Pressure

2014
The efficacy and safety of arotinolol combined with a different calcium channel blocker in the treatment of Chinese patients with essential hypertension: a one-year follow-up study.
    Clinical and experimental hypertension (New York, N.Y. : 1993), 2014, Volume: 36, Issue:8

    Topics: Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists; Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Amlodipine; Anti

2014
Blood pressure control with a single-pill combination of indapamide sustained-release and amlodipine in patients with hypertension: the EFFICIENT study.
    PloS one, 2014, Volume: 9, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Delayed-Action Preparations; Drug Combin

2014
Evaluation of the efficacy and tolerability of fixed-dose combination therapy of azilsartan and amlodipine besylate in Japanese patients with grade I to II essential hypertension.
    Clinical therapeutics, 2014, Volume: 36, Issue:5

    Topics: Aged; Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Asian People; Benzimidazoles; Dose-Response Relationship,

2014
Differential effects of azelnidipine and amlodipine on sympathetic nerve activity in patients with primary hypertension.
    Journal of hypertension, 2014, Volume: 32, Issue:9

    Topics: Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Azetidinecarboxylic Acid; Baroreflex; Blood Pressure; Calcium C

2014
[Fixed irbesartan/amlodipine combination: efficacy and safety of the use of four dosing regimens in patients with arterial hypertension].
    Kardiologiia, 2014, Volume: 54, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Biphenyl Compounds; Blood Pressure; Dose-Response Relatio

2014
Aortic remodelling following the treatment and regression of hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study.
    Clinical and experimental hypertension (New York, N.Y. : 1993), 2015, Volume: 37, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Amlodipine; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Antihypertensive Agents; Aorta, Th

2015
Efficacy and safety of fixed-dose losartan/hydrochlorothiazide/amlodipine combination versus losartan/hydrochlorothiazide combination in Japanese patients with essential hypertension.
    Clinical and experimental hypertension (New York, N.Y. : 1993), 2015, Volume: 37, Issue:3

    Topics: Aged; Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Drug Combinations; Drug Monitoring; Essen

2015
Efficacy and safety of fixed-dose losartan/hydrochlorothiazide/amlodipine combination versus losartan/hydrochlorothiazide combination in Japanese patients with essential hypertension.
    Clinical and experimental hypertension (New York, N.Y. : 1993), 2015, Volume: 37, Issue:3

    Topics: Aged; Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Drug Combinations; Drug Monitoring; Essen

2015
Efficacy and safety of fixed-dose losartan/hydrochlorothiazide/amlodipine combination versus losartan/hydrochlorothiazide combination in Japanese patients with essential hypertension.
    Clinical and experimental hypertension (New York, N.Y. : 1993), 2015, Volume: 37, Issue:3

    Topics: Aged; Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Drug Combinations; Drug Monitoring; Essen

2015
Efficacy and safety of fixed-dose losartan/hydrochlorothiazide/amlodipine combination versus losartan/hydrochlorothiazide combination in Japanese patients with essential hypertension.
    Clinical and experimental hypertension (New York, N.Y. : 1993), 2015, Volume: 37, Issue:3

    Topics: Aged; Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Drug Combinations; Drug Monitoring; Essen

2015
Endocan, a novel marker of endothelial dysfunction in patients with essential hypertension: comparative effects of amlodipine and valsartan.
    Blood pressure, 2015, Volume: 24, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; C-Reactive Protein; Endothelium, Vascula

2015
[A fixed-dose lisinopril and amlodipine combination in conjunction with rosuvastatin in patients with hypertensive disease and coronary heart disease].
    Terapevticheskii arkhiv, 2014, Volume: 86, Issue:9

    Topics: Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Coronary Disease; Dose-Response Relationship, D

2014
Pharmacogenomics of hypertension: a genome‐wide, placebo‐controlled cross‐over study, using four classes of antihypertensive drugs.
    Journal of the American Heart Association, 2015, Jan-26, Volume: 4, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aldehyde Oxidoreductases; Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compo

2015
Add-on effect of hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg in Japanese subjects with essential hypertension uncontrolled with losartan 50 mg and amlodipine 5 mg.
    Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2015, Volume: 38, Issue:5

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Double-Blind Me

2015
A Randomized, Multicenter, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, 3 × 3 Factorial Design, Phase II Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of the Combination of Fimasartan/Amlodipine in Patients With Essential Hypertension.
    Clinical therapeutics, 2015, Nov-01, Volume: 37, Issue:11

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Biphenyl Compounds; Blood Pressure; Double-Blind M

2015
Efficacy and Safety of Fixed-Dose Perindopril Arginine/Amlodipine in Hypertensive Patients Not Adequately Controlled with Amlodipine 5 mg or Perindopril tert-Butylamine 4 mg Monotherapy.
    Cardiology, 2016, Volume: 134, Issue:1

    Topics: Aged; Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; D

2016
Comparative study of the efficacy of olmesartan/amlodipine vs. perindopril/amlodipine in peripheral blood pressure after missed dose in type 2 diabetes.
    Journal of hypertension, 2016, Volume: 34, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Amlodipine; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhi

2016
A Randomized, Double-blind, Multicenter, Phase III Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Fimasartan/Amlodipine Combined Therapy Versus Fimasartan Monotherapy in Patients With Essential Hypertension Unresponsive to Fimasartan Monotherapy.
    Clinical therapeutics, 2016, Volume: 38, Issue:10

    Topics: Aged; Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Biphenyl Compounds; Blood Pressure; Double-Blind Method;

2016
The efficacy and long-term safety of a triple combination of 80 mg telmisartan, 5 mg amlodipine and 12.5 mg hydrochlorothiazide in Japanese patients with essential hypertension: a randomized, double-blind study with open-label extension.
    Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2017, Volume: 40, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Benzoates; Blood Pressure; Double-

2017
Effects of Amlodipine and Valsartan on Blood Pressure Variability and Pulse Wave Velocity in Hypertensive Patients.
    The American journal of the medical sciences, 2017, Volume: 353, Issue:1

    Topics: Aged; Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Drug Therapy, Combination; Essential Hype

2017
Blood pressure-lowering efficacy and safety of perindopril/indapamide/amlodipine single-pill combination in patients with uncontrolled essential hypertension: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial.
    Journal of hypertension, 2017, Volume: 35, Issue:7

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulat

2017
An additional LDL-lowering effect of amlodipine; not only an antihypertensive?
    Clinical and experimental hypertension (New York, N.Y. : 1993), 2013, Volume: 35, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Amlodipine; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Antihypertensive Agents; Calcium C

2013
The comparative effects of valsartan and amlodipine on vWf levels and N/L ratio in patients with newly diagnosed hypertension.
    Clinical and experimental hypertension (New York, N.Y. : 1993), 2013, Volume: 35, Issue:7

    Topics: Adult; Amlodipine; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Antihypertensive Agents; Biomarkers; Blo

2013

Other Studies

16 other studies available for amlodipine and Essential Hypertension

ArticleYear
Ambulatory blood pressure response to S-amlodipine in Korean adult patients with uncontrolled essential hypertension: A prospective, observational study.
    Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2022, Volume: 24, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulat

2022
Clinical assessment of levamlodipine besylate combination therapy for essential hypertension: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Medicine, 2022, Apr-01, Volume: 101, Issue:13

    Topics: Amlodipine; Combined Modality Therapy; Essential Hypertension; Humans; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Syste

2022
Effects of Different Antihypertensive Drug Combinations on Blood Pressure and Arterial Stiffness.
    Medical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina), 2019, Volume: 73, Issue:3

    Topics: Aged; Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Arteries; Blood Pressure; Diastole; Drug Combinations; Es

2019
The effectiveness of combinated antihypertensive treatment in patients with essential hypertension of the ii-nd stage depending on the type of daily blood pressure profile and the type of remodelling of the left ventricle.
    Wiadomosci lekarskie (Warsaw, Poland : 1960), 2020, Volume: 73, Issue:1

    Topics: Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory; Essentia

2020
Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of a Single-Pill Combination of Olmesartan/Amlodipine/Hydrochlorothiazide in Korean Patients with Essential Hypertension (RESOLVE): A Large, Observational, Retrospective, Cohort Study.
    Advances in therapy, 2020, Volume: 37, Issue:8

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Asian People; Cohort Studies; D

2020
Influence of PRKCH gene polymorphism on antihypertensive response to amlodipine and telmisartan.
    Clinical and experimental hypertension (New York, N.Y. : 1993), 2017, Volume: 39, Issue:8

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Arterial Pressure; Asian People; Benzimidazoles; B

2017
Diabetic patients with essential hypertension treated with amlodipine: blood pressure and arterial stiffness effects of canagliflozin or perindopril.
    Journal of hypertension, 2019, Volume: 37, Issue:3

    Topics: Aged; Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Canagliflozin; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2;

2019
Clinical impact of patient adherence to a fixed-dose combination of olmesartan, amlodipine and hydrochlorothiazide.
    Clinical drug investigation, 2014, Volume: 34, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Drug Combinations; Essential Hyper

2014
Benefits of a fixed-dose combination of bisoprolol and amlodipine in the treatment of hypertension in daily practice: results of more than 4000 patients.
    Current medical research and opinion, 2015, Volume: 31, Issue:5

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Bisoprolol; Blood Pressure; Dru

2015
[Stiffness of the Arterial Wall and Central Hemodynamics During Long-Term Combination Antihypertensive Therapy].
    Kardiologiia, 2015, Volume: 55, Issue:4

    Topics: Aged; Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Aorta; Blood Pressure; Drug Combinations; Essential Hyper

2015
[Therapy of Arterial Hypertension in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure and Signs of Chronic Kidney Disease With Fixed Perindopril/Amlodipine Combination].
    Kardiologiia, 2015, Volume: 55, Issue:6

    Topics: Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Combinat

2015
Influence of G-protein β-Polypeptide 3 C825T Polymorphism on Antihypertensive Response to Telmisartan and Amlodipine in Chinese Patients.
    Chinese medical journal, 2016, Jan-05, Volume: 129, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Benzoates; Blood Pressure; Essenti

2016
The Efficacy of Perindopril/Amlodipine in Reaching Blood Pressure Targets: Results of the CONTROL Study.
    Clinical drug investigation, 2016, Volume: 36, Issue:5

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Amlodipine; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pr

2016
Effects of antihypertensive treatment on plasma apelin, resistin, and visfatin concentrations.
    Polskie Archiwum Medycyny Wewnetrznej, 2016, Apr-29, Volume: 126, Issue:4

    Topics: Adrenergic beta-1 Receptor Antagonists; Adult; Amlodipine; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers;

2016
Effects of azelnidipine and amlodipine on exercise-induced sympathoexcitation assessed by pupillometry in hypertensive patients.
    Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2016, Volume: 39, Issue:12

    Topics: Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Autonomic Nervous System; Azetidinecarboxylic Acid; Blood Press

2016
[Association between gene polymorphism of calcium/calmodulin-dependent kinase 4 and efficacy of amlodipine in the treatment of hypertension in Chinese Han nationality].
    Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences, 2016, Volume: 41, Issue:8

    Topics: Alleles; Amlodipine; Asian People; Blood Pressure; Calcium-Calmodulin-Dependent Protein Kinase Type

2016