Page last updated: 2024-10-22

amlodipine and Edema

amlodipine has been researched along with Edema in 76 studies

Amlodipine: A long-acting dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker. It is effective in the treatment of ANGINA PECTORIS and HYPERTENSION.
amlodipine : A fully substituted dialkyl 1,4-dihydropyridine-3,5-dicarboxylate derivative, which is used for the treatment of hypertension, chronic stable angina and confirmed or suspected vasospastic angina.

Edema: Abnormal fluid accumulation in TISSUES or body cavities. Most cases of edema are present under the SKIN in SUBCUTANEOUS TISSUE.

Research Excerpts

ExcerptRelevanceReference
"Chlorthalidone is a very effective antihypertensive drug, but it has not been studied prospectively in kidney transplant recipients with hypertension."9.24Chlorthalidone Versus Amlodipine for Hypertension in Kidney Transplant Recipients Treated With Tacrolimus: A Randomized Crossover Trial. ( Hesselink, DA; Hoorn, EJ; Moes, AD; van den Meiracker, AH; Zietse, R, 2017)
"In hypertensive patients not controlled on prior BB and ACEI/ARB therapy, addition of (S)-amlodipine besylate at half the dose of conventional amlodipine provides better tolerability with reduced incidence of peripheral edema, and equal antihypertensive efficacy compared to amlodipine given at usual doses."9.22Leg edema with (S)-amlodipine vs conventional amlodipine given in triple therapy for hypertension: a randomized double blind controlled clinical trial. ( Ekanayaka, RA; Galappatthy, GK; Galappatthy, P; Sabeer, MI; Waniganayake, YC; Wijethunga, TJ, 2016)
" We enrolled 141 patients and evaluated the efficacy and safety between a fixed dose of olmesartan/amlodipine (OA) and a double dose of amlodipine (DA) for treating mild to moderate hypertension after amlodipine monotherapy failure."9.17Efficacy and tolerability between an olmesartan/amlodipine fixed-dose combination and an amlodipine double dose in mild to moderate hypertension. ( Hou, CJ; Hsia, CH; Lai, WT; Lin, TH; Pan, JP; Tsai, CD; Tsai, JP, 2013)
"In this population of healthy subjects and patients with hypertension, segmental bioimpedance was comparable to water displacement and ankle circumference and outperformed clinical assessment of pitting for the detection of ankle edema, supporting the use of segmental bioimpedance as a drug-development tool to objectively quantify amlodipine-induced pedal edema."9.16Segmental bioimpedance for measuring amlodipine-induced pedal edema: a placebo-controlled study. ( Alon, A; Beals, CR; Bolognese, JA; Heymsfield, SB; Lasseter, KC; Manekas, D; Mixson, LA; Noonan, GP; Nunes, I; Schoeller, DA, 2012)
"This exploratory study compared the amount of pedal edema experienced by female Korean patients with mild to moderate hypertension when receiving S(-)-amlodipine nicotinate compared with amlodipine besylate."9.16Quantification of pedal edema during treatment with S(-)-amlodipine nicotinate versus amlodipine besylate in female Korean patients with mild to moderate hypertension: a 12-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, phase IV clinical ( Choi, DJ; Kang, HJ; Lee, HY; Oh, BH; Oh, GC; Zo, JH, 2012)
"The objective of this research was to evaluate the effect of telmisartan addition to amlodipine, on peripheral edema in hypertensive patients."9.15Effect of telmisartan addition to amlodipine on ankle edema development in treating hypertensive patients. ( Derosa, G; Fogari, R; Lazzari, P; Maffioli, P; Mugellini, A; Zoppi, A, 2011)
"After 4-week placebo, 120 outpatients with grade 1 - 2 hypertension were randomized to amlodipine 10 mg or aliskiren 300 mg or their combination for 8 weeks in three crossover periods."9.15Effect of aliskiren addition to amlodipine on ankle edema in hypertensive patients: a three-way crossover study. ( Derosa, G; Fogari, R; Lazzari, P; Maffioli, P; Monti, C; Mugellini, A; Zoppi, A, 2011)
"The objective of this Phase III double-blind parallel-group controlled study was to examine the superiority of amlodipine 10 mg once daily (the amlodipine 10 mg group) to amlodipine 5 mg once daily (the amlodipine 5 mg group) in 305 Japanese outpatients with essential hypertension whose systolic blood pressure (SBP) had not reached the therapeutic target levels (<130-140/80-90 mm Hg) when treated with amlodipine 5 mg once daily."9.14The Phase III, double-blind, parallel-group controlled study of amlodipine 10 mg once daily in Japanese patients with essential hypertension who insufficiently responded to amlodipine 5 mg once daily. ( Buch, J; Fujiwara, T; Hatsuzawa, J; Ii, Y; Kimura, N; Murakami, M; Murase, H; Saruta, T; Tsuchihashi, T; Watanabe, T, 2009)
"To demonstrate the benefit of the combination amlodipine/valsartan 5/160 mg over amlodipine 10 mg, in producing a lower incidence of peripheral oedema for a comparable mean sitting systolic blood pressure (MSSBP) reduction."9.14The combination of amlodipine/valsartan 5/160 mg produces less peripheral oedema than amlodipine 10 mg in hypertensive patients not adequately controlled with amlodipine 5 mg. ( Akpinar, E; Brunel, P; Calvo, C; Keeling, L; Salvetti, A; Schrader, J; Weisskopf, M, 2009)
"To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of the fixed combination: amlodipine + enalapril, when compared to amlodipine in the normalization of the diastolic arterial pressure (DAP) (<85 mmHg), in pts with CAD and systemic arterial hypertension (SAH)."9.14Combination of amlodipine and enalapril in hypertensive patients with coronary disease. ( Armagnajian, D; César, LA; Ferreira, JF; Gomes, EP; Mansur, Ade P; Moretti, MA; Nogueira, PR; Ramires, JA; Rienzo, M; Saraiva, JF, 2009)
"The objective of this study was to compare the effect on ankle edema of adding valsartan (V) or olmesartan (O) to amlodipine (A) in the treatment of hypertension."9.14Effect of valsartan or olmesartan addition to amlodipine on ankle edema in hypertensive patients. ( Corradi, L; Derosa, G; Fogari, R; Malamani, G; Mugellini, A; Preti, P; Zoppi, A, 2010)
"This multicentre, double-blind, trial in subjects with severe hypertension compared the efficacy and tolerability of two parallel drug regimens: A/B (amlodipine/benazepril: 5/20 or 10/40 mg daily, if necessary) with A (amlodipine: 5 or 10 mg daily, if necessary)."9.14Comparative efficacy and safety of amlodipine/benazepril combination therapy and amlodipine monotherapy in severe hypertension. ( Hall, D; Hilkert, RJ; Izzo, JL; Purkayastha, D, 2010)
"In this population of patients with essential hypertension, the amlodipine/ramipril FDC was associated with significantly reduced ambulatory and office-measured BP compared with amlodipine monotherapy, with the exception of office DBP."9.13An 18-week, prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study of amlodipine/ramipril combination versus amlodipine monotherapy in the treatment of hypertension: the assessment of combination therapy of amlodipine/ramipril (ATAR) study. ( Amodeo, C; Filho, BL; Gomes, MA; Kohlmann, O; Mion, D; Miranda, RD; Rocha, JC; Saraiva, JF, 2008)
"The aim of this study was to assess the effect of valsartan addition to amlodipine on ankle foot volume (AFV) and pretibial subcutaneous tissue pressure (PSTP), two objective measures of ankle oedema."9.12Effect of valsartan addition to amlodipine on ankle oedema and subcutaneous tissue pressure in hypertensive patients. ( Derosa, G; Fogari, E; Fogari, R; Lazzari, P; Mugellini, A; Preti, P; Rinaldi, A; Zoppi, A, 2007)
"5 mg was compared with that of amlodipine, in a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, parallel-group study in patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension inadequately controlled by monotherapy."9.12Efficacy and tolerability of candesartan cilexetil/hydrochlorothiazide and amlodipine in patients with poorly controlled mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. ( Derosa, G; Fogari, R; Mugellini, A, 2007)
"The antihypertensive efficacy of nebivolol and amlodipine and their tolerability were compared in a multicentre, randomized, active-controlled, double-blind parallel-group trial in elderly patients with mild to moderate essential arterial hypertension."9.10Nebivolol vs amlodipine as first-line treatment of essential arterial hypertension in the elderly. ( Gil-Extremera, B; Maldonato, A; Mazza, A; Pessina, AC; Toutouzas, T, 2002)
"To compare the effect of amlodipine, a prototype dihydropyridine calcium-channel blocker with lercanidipine, a newer dihydropyridine compound with lipophilic properties, on dependent oedema generation and interference with skin blood flow vasomotion in hypertensive patients."9.10Heterogeneous effect of calcium antagonists on leg oedema: a comparison of amlodipine versus lercanidipine in hypertensive patients. ( Balbarini, A; Dell'Omo, G; Mariani, M; Menegato, A; Nuti, M; Pedrinelli, R, 2003)
"In postmenopausal females with mild to moderate hypertension the oedema formation of Lercanidipine was significantly less than that of Amlodipine, despite no significant differences in the antihypertensive effect."9.10Quantification of leg oedema in postmenopausal hypertensive patients treated with lercanidipine or amlodipine. ( Helberg, S; Istad, H; Lund-Johansen, P; Madsbu, S; Risberg, K; Rønnevik, PK; Stranden, E; Wessel-Aas, T, 2003)
"The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of benazepril addition to amlodipine antihypertensive treatment on ankle-foot volume (AFV) and pretibial subcutaneous tissue pressure (PSTP), two objective measures of ankle oedema."9.10Effect of benazepril addition to amlodipine on ankle oedema and subcutaneous tissue pressure in hypertensive patients. ( Fogari, R; Malamani, GD; Mugellini, A; Preti, P; Rinaldi, A; Vanasia, A; Zoppi, A, 2003)
"All studies suggesting a lower incidence of edema on lacidipine than on amlodipine are based on subjective scoring."9.09Ankle edema formation during treatment with the calcium channel blockers lacidipine and amlodipine: a single-centre study. ( Andrésdóttir, MB; Huysmans, FT; Valk, IM; van de Bosch, WJ; van Hamersvelt, HW; van Helden, MJ, 2000)
"The comparative antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of the angiotensin II receptor blocker candesartan cilexetil and the calcium channel blocker amlodipine were evaluated in an 8-week, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, forced-titration study in 251 adult patients (45% women, 16% black) with mild hypertension (stage 1)."9.09Comparative effects of candesartan cilexetil and amlodipine in patients with mild systemic hypertension. Comparison of Candesartan and Amlodipine for Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy (CASTLE) Study Investigators. ( Chrysant, SG; Harris, SM; Kloner, RA; Leidy, NK; Michelson, EL; Pool, JL; Prasad, R; Weinberger, M; Zyczynski, TM, 2001)
" To evaluate the dose-response relation between this pharmacological interference and dependent edema, a frequent side effect of CCBs during antihypertensive treatment, skin blood flow (laser Doppler flowmetry) at the dorsum of the foot, both supine and with the limb passively placed 50 cm below the heart level, and leg weight (Archimedes principle) were measured at baseline, during increasing doses of the dihydropyridine amlodipine (5 and 10 mg UID each for 2 weeks), and after drug withdrawal in 10 hypertensive men."9.09Amlodipine, enalapril, and dependent leg edema in essential hypertension. ( Dell'Omo, G; Mariani, M; Melillo, E; Pedrinelli, R, 2000)
"One hundred sixty-eight adult outpatients with mild to moderate hypertension were randomly allocated in double-blind fashion and equal number to receive 80 mg valsartan or 5 mg amlodipine for 12 weeks."9.08Valsartan, a new angiotensin II antagonist for the treatment of essential hypertension: a comparative study of the efficacy and safety against amlodipine. ( Bodin, F; Cardoni, O; Corea, L; Fogari, R; Innocenti, P; Meilenbrock, S; Porcellati, C; Provvidenza, M; Sullivan, J, 1996)
"The present study aimed to assess the efficacy and tolerance of amlodipine (Norvasc-Pfizer) in the treatment of 152 patients with mild and moderate essential hypertension."9.08-Efficacy and safety of using amlodipine in treatment of mild and moderate essential hypertension-. ( Kokot, F; Kokot, M; Raszewska, J; Rychlik, G; Witkowicz, J, 1995)
"5-10 mg) once daily was compared with atenolol (50-100 mg) once daily in patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension in a randomized, double-blind, parallel, placebo-controlled study."9.07Amlodipine versus atenolol in essential hypertension. ( Brobyn, R; Brown, RD; Frishman, WH; Johnson, BF; Reeves, RL; Wombolt, DG, 1994)
"Use of amlodipine for treatment of arterial hypertension and stable coronary artery disease (CAD) is sometimes limited by occurrence of peripheral edema and headache."9.01Peripheral edema and headache associated with amlodipine treatment: a meta-analysis of randomized, placebo-controlled trials. ( Böhm, M; Mahfoud, F; Messerli, FH; Scholz, SS; Vukadinović, D; Weber, MA; Williams, B, 2019)
" Hypertensive Patients who were on amlodipine for at least 6 months and presented with pedal edema were enrolled for the study."8.02Cilnidipine for Amlodipine Induced Pedal Edema and its Anti-hypertensive Effect in a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital of Western Nepal. ( Kafle, RC; Maskey, A; Sapkota, S, 2021)
"In this case report, we describe a rare case of amlodipine induced massive ascites in a 30-year-old male with renal transplantation."7.96Amlodipine Induced Massive Ascites, a Rare Clinical Case. ( Arasan, SN; Cevher, SK; Dede, F; Yenigun, EC, 2020)
"This prospective, open-label, postmarketing surveillance study enrolled adults with arterial hypertension (systolic BP >140 mmHg and/or diastolic BP >90 mmHg) who were prescribed antihypertensive therapy with single-pill combination amlodipine/valsartan 5/80, 5/160, or 10/160 mg once daily."7.78Amlodipine/valsartan single-pill combination: a prospective, observational evaluation of the real-life safety and effectiveness in the routine treatment of hypertension. ( Dongre, N; Karpov, Y; Sastravaha, K; Vigdorchik, A, 2012)
"To report a case of bilateral upper extremity edema associated with amlodipine use in a child."7.74Amlodipine-induced bilateral upper extremity edema. ( Ganeshalingham, A; Wong, W, 2007)
"To report a case of anasarca edema associated with amlodipine use."7.73Anasarca edema with amlodipine treatment. ( Arioğul, S; Cankurtaran, M; Halil, M; Sener, D; Yavuz, BB, 2005)
"0001), and a lower incidence of pedal edema and adverse events compared with amlodipine."6.80Efficacy and safety of perindopril arginine + amlodipine in hypertension. ( Bakris, GL; Elliott, WJ; Feldstein, JD; Whitmore, J, 2015)
" Both treatment groups had similar adverse event rates (35."6.76Comparative efficacy and safety of combination aliskiren/amlodipine and amlodipine monotherapy in African Americans with stage 2 hypertension. ( Black, HR; Hilkert, R; Israel, M; Izzo, J; Lee, J; Purkayastha, D; Sridharan, K; Weinberger, MH, 2011)
" Blood pressure measurements were taken at the end of the dosing interval to assess the antihypertensive efficacy of the two drugs."6.67At equipotent doses, isradipine is better tolerated than amlodipine in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension: a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study. ( De Keyser, P; Deblander, A; Hermans, L; Lesaffre, E; Scheys, I; Westelinck, KJ, 1994)
" Most adverse events were mild or moderate and the investigators' overall evaluation of tolerability was excellent or good for 91% of patients."6.67A study of the efficacy and safety of amlodipine for the treatment of hypertension in general practice. ( Varrone, J, 1991)
" A systematic review of the literature revealed its most common adverse effects as: peripheral edema (depending on the dose of amlodipine, but attenuated by perindopril), cough, dizziness and hypotension."6.58Perindopril arginine and amlodipine besylate for hypertension: a safety evaluation. ( Bistrika, EA; Elliott, WJ, 2018)
"Pedal oedema is a well-known adverse effect of amlodipine, but significantly less frequent if only half of the maximum recommended dosage is used."5.41 ( Christensen, B; Helgestad, OK; Henriksen, JN; Oxlund, CS; Skovbjerg, BK, 2023)
"Amlodipine therapy was discontinued and oedema diminished markedly within 72 hours."5.39Generalised peripheral oedema associated with amlodipine therapy in two dogs. ( Creevy, KE; Ellis, AE; Scuderi, MA, 2013)
"Although hypertension is common (30% of adults in the USA), its control to recommended blood pressure levels of under 140/90 mmHg remains low, at 36."5.35Amlodipine besylate/olmesartan medoximil fixed combination for the treatment of hypertension. ( Chrysant, SG, 2009)
"Chlorthalidone is a very effective antihypertensive drug, but it has not been studied prospectively in kidney transplant recipients with hypertension."5.24Chlorthalidone Versus Amlodipine for Hypertension in Kidney Transplant Recipients Treated With Tacrolimus: A Randomized Crossover Trial. ( Hesselink, DA; Hoorn, EJ; Moes, AD; van den Meiracker, AH; Zietse, R, 2017)
"In hypertensive patients not controlled on prior BB and ACEI/ARB therapy, addition of (S)-amlodipine besylate at half the dose of conventional amlodipine provides better tolerability with reduced incidence of peripheral edema, and equal antihypertensive efficacy compared to amlodipine given at usual doses."5.22Leg edema with (S)-amlodipine vs conventional amlodipine given in triple therapy for hypertension: a randomized double blind controlled clinical trial. ( Ekanayaka, RA; Galappatthy, GK; Galappatthy, P; Sabeer, MI; Waniganayake, YC; Wijethunga, TJ, 2016)
" We enrolled 141 patients and evaluated the efficacy and safety between a fixed dose of olmesartan/amlodipine (OA) and a double dose of amlodipine (DA) for treating mild to moderate hypertension after amlodipine monotherapy failure."5.17Efficacy and tolerability between an olmesartan/amlodipine fixed-dose combination and an amlodipine double dose in mild to moderate hypertension. ( Hou, CJ; Hsia, CH; Lai, WT; Lin, TH; Pan, JP; Tsai, CD; Tsai, JP, 2013)
"This exploratory study compared the amount of pedal edema experienced by female Korean patients with mild to moderate hypertension when receiving S(-)-amlodipine nicotinate compared with amlodipine besylate."5.16Quantification of pedal edema during treatment with S(-)-amlodipine nicotinate versus amlodipine besylate in female Korean patients with mild to moderate hypertension: a 12-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, phase IV clinical ( Choi, DJ; Kang, HJ; Lee, HY; Oh, BH; Oh, GC; Zo, JH, 2012)
"In this population of healthy subjects and patients with hypertension, segmental bioimpedance was comparable to water displacement and ankle circumference and outperformed clinical assessment of pitting for the detection of ankle edema, supporting the use of segmental bioimpedance as a drug-development tool to objectively quantify amlodipine-induced pedal edema."5.16Segmental bioimpedance for measuring amlodipine-induced pedal edema: a placebo-controlled study. ( Alon, A; Beals, CR; Bolognese, JA; Heymsfield, SB; Lasseter, KC; Manekas, D; Mixson, LA; Noonan, GP; Nunes, I; Schoeller, DA, 2012)
"After 4-week placebo, 120 outpatients with grade 1 - 2 hypertension were randomized to amlodipine 10 mg or aliskiren 300 mg or their combination for 8 weeks in three crossover periods."5.15Effect of aliskiren addition to amlodipine on ankle edema in hypertensive patients: a three-way crossover study. ( Derosa, G; Fogari, R; Lazzari, P; Maffioli, P; Monti, C; Mugellini, A; Zoppi, A, 2011)
"The objective of this research was to evaluate the effect of telmisartan addition to amlodipine, on peripheral edema in hypertensive patients."5.15Effect of telmisartan addition to amlodipine on ankle edema development in treating hypertensive patients. ( Derosa, G; Fogari, R; Lazzari, P; Maffioli, P; Mugellini, A; Zoppi, A, 2011)
"The objective of this study was to compare the effect on ankle edema of adding valsartan (V) or olmesartan (O) to amlodipine (A) in the treatment of hypertension."5.14Effect of valsartan or olmesartan addition to amlodipine on ankle edema in hypertensive patients. ( Corradi, L; Derosa, G; Fogari, R; Malamani, G; Mugellini, A; Preti, P; Zoppi, A, 2010)
"This multicentre, double-blind, trial in subjects with severe hypertension compared the efficacy and tolerability of two parallel drug regimens: A/B (amlodipine/benazepril: 5/20 or 10/40 mg daily, if necessary) with A (amlodipine: 5 or 10 mg daily, if necessary)."5.14Comparative efficacy and safety of amlodipine/benazepril combination therapy and amlodipine monotherapy in severe hypertension. ( Hall, D; Hilkert, RJ; Izzo, JL; Purkayastha, D, 2010)
"5%) and none of lercanidipine group developed edema; p = 0."5.14Comparison of changes of body water measured by using bioelectrical impedance analysis between lercanidipine and amlodipine therapy in hypertensive outpatients. ( Sansanayudh, N; Veerayuthvilai, S; Wongwiwatthananukit, S, 2010)
"To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of the fixed combination: amlodipine + enalapril, when compared to amlodipine in the normalization of the diastolic arterial pressure (DAP) (<85 mmHg), in pts with CAD and systemic arterial hypertension (SAH)."5.14Combination of amlodipine and enalapril in hypertensive patients with coronary disease. ( Armagnajian, D; César, LA; Ferreira, JF; Gomes, EP; Mansur, Ade P; Moretti, MA; Nogueira, PR; Ramires, JA; Rienzo, M; Saraiva, JF, 2009)
"To demonstrate the benefit of the combination amlodipine/valsartan 5/160 mg over amlodipine 10 mg, in producing a lower incidence of peripheral oedema for a comparable mean sitting systolic blood pressure (MSSBP) reduction."5.14The combination of amlodipine/valsartan 5/160 mg produces less peripheral oedema than amlodipine 10 mg in hypertensive patients not adequately controlled with amlodipine 5 mg. ( Akpinar, E; Brunel, P; Calvo, C; Keeling, L; Salvetti, A; Schrader, J; Weisskopf, M, 2009)
"The objective of this Phase III double-blind parallel-group controlled study was to examine the superiority of amlodipine 10 mg once daily (the amlodipine 10 mg group) to amlodipine 5 mg once daily (the amlodipine 5 mg group) in 305 Japanese outpatients with essential hypertension whose systolic blood pressure (SBP) had not reached the therapeutic target levels (<130-140/80-90 mm Hg) when treated with amlodipine 5 mg once daily."5.14The Phase III, double-blind, parallel-group controlled study of amlodipine 10 mg once daily in Japanese patients with essential hypertension who insufficiently responded to amlodipine 5 mg once daily. ( Buch, J; Fujiwara, T; Hatsuzawa, J; Ii, Y; Kimura, N; Murakami, M; Murase, H; Saruta, T; Tsuchihashi, T; Watanabe, T, 2009)
"In this population of patients with essential hypertension, the amlodipine/ramipril FDC was associated with significantly reduced ambulatory and office-measured BP compared with amlodipine monotherapy, with the exception of office DBP."5.13An 18-week, prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study of amlodipine/ramipril combination versus amlodipine monotherapy in the treatment of hypertension: the assessment of combination therapy of amlodipine/ramipril (ATAR) study. ( Amodeo, C; Filho, BL; Gomes, MA; Kohlmann, O; Mion, D; Miranda, RD; Rocha, JC; Saraiva, JF, 2008)
"The aim of this study was to assess the effect of valsartan addition to amlodipine on ankle foot volume (AFV) and pretibial subcutaneous tissue pressure (PSTP), two objective measures of ankle oedema."5.12Effect of valsartan addition to amlodipine on ankle oedema and subcutaneous tissue pressure in hypertensive patients. ( Derosa, G; Fogari, E; Fogari, R; Lazzari, P; Mugellini, A; Preti, P; Rinaldi, A; Zoppi, A, 2007)
"Two studies were conducted to compare the efficacy of various combinations of amlodipine and valsartan administered once daily with their individual components and placebo in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension (mean sitting diastolic blood pressure [MSDBP] >/=95 and < 110 mm Hg)."5.12Two multicenter, 8-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group studies evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of amlodipine and valsartan in combination and as monotherapy in adult patients with mild to moderate essential hyperten ( Glazer, R; Jin, J; Philipp, T; Pospiech, R; Schneider, H; Smith, TR; Wernsing, M; Yen, J, 2007)
"5 mg was compared with that of amlodipine, in a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, parallel-group study in patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension inadequately controlled by monotherapy."5.12Efficacy and tolerability of candesartan cilexetil/hydrochlorothiazide and amlodipine in patients with poorly controlled mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. ( Derosa, G; Fogari, R; Mugellini, A, 2007)
"The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a new fixed-dose combination (FDC) of telmisartan 40 mg + amlodipine 5 mg (T+A) compared with amlodipine 5-mg monotherapy (A) in adult Indian patients with stage II hypertension."5.12Results of a comparative, phase III, 12-week, multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind assessment of the efficacy and tolerability of a fixed-dose combination of telmisartan and amlodipine versus amlodipine monotherapy in Indian adults with stag ( Bagchi, A; Baliga, VP; Bollmall, C; Kinagi, SB; Sharma, A; Sharma, YK, 2007)
"This multicenter, double-blind, 12-week study randomized 364 patients with stage 2 hypertension to fixed-dose combination therapy with amlodipine besylate/benazepril HCl (5/20 mg/d titrated to 10/20 mg/d) or amlodipine besylate monotherapy (5 mg/d titrated to 10 mg/d)."5.11Initial angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/calcium channel blocker combination therapy achieves superior blood pressure control compared with calcium channel blocker monotherapy in patients with stage 2 hypertension. ( Baron, M; Jamerson, KA; Jean-Louis, L; Nwose, O; Purkayastha, D; Schofield, L, 2004)
" We investigated the effects on 24-h ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) of the angiotensin-receptor blocker, valsartan, in combination with hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ), compared with the calcium-channel blocker amlodipine in a Brazilian population in a multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group, controlled study in 373 patients with essential hypertension."5.10Efficacy and tolerability of the combination valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide compared with amlodipine in a mild-to-moderately hypertensive Brazilian population. ( Franco, RJ; Goldflus, S; McQuitty, M; Oigman, W, 2003)
"The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of benazepril addition to amlodipine antihypertensive treatment on ankle-foot volume (AFV) and pretibial subcutaneous tissue pressure (PSTP), two objective measures of ankle oedema."5.10Effect of benazepril addition to amlodipine on ankle oedema and subcutaneous tissue pressure in hypertensive patients. ( Fogari, R; Malamani, GD; Mugellini, A; Preti, P; Rinaldi, A; Vanasia, A; Zoppi, A, 2003)
"In postmenopausal females with mild to moderate hypertension the oedema formation of Lercanidipine was significantly less than that of Amlodipine, despite no significant differences in the antihypertensive effect."5.10Quantification of leg oedema in postmenopausal hypertensive patients treated with lercanidipine or amlodipine. ( Helberg, S; Istad, H; Lund-Johansen, P; Madsbu, S; Risberg, K; Rønnevik, PK; Stranden, E; Wessel-Aas, T, 2003)
"The antihypertensive efficacy of nebivolol and amlodipine and their tolerability were compared in a multicentre, randomized, active-controlled, double-blind parallel-group trial in elderly patients with mild to moderate essential arterial hypertension."5.10Nebivolol vs amlodipine as first-line treatment of essential arterial hypertension in the elderly. ( Gil-Extremera, B; Maldonato, A; Mazza, A; Pessina, AC; Toutouzas, T, 2002)
"To compare the effect of amlodipine, a prototype dihydropyridine calcium-channel blocker with lercanidipine, a newer dihydropyridine compound with lipophilic properties, on dependent oedema generation and interference with skin blood flow vasomotion in hypertensive patients."5.10Heterogeneous effect of calcium antagonists on leg oedema: a comparison of amlodipine versus lercanidipine in hypertensive patients. ( Balbarini, A; Dell'Omo, G; Mariani, M; Menegato, A; Nuti, M; Pedrinelli, R, 2003)
"Hypertensive patients currently taking amlodipine were selected based on one of two criteria: inadequate blood pressure (BP) control on amlodipine (diastolic BP [DBP] > or = 90 mm Hg; group 1), or inability to tolerate amlodipine (DBP < or = 90 mm Hg, but with edema; group 2)."5.10Combination therapy of amlodipine/benazepril versus monotherapy of amlodipine in a practice-based setting. ( Messerli, FH; Neutel, JM; Weir, MR, 2002)
" To evaluate the dose-response relation between this pharmacological interference and dependent edema, a frequent side effect of CCBs during antihypertensive treatment, skin blood flow (laser Doppler flowmetry) at the dorsum of the foot, both supine and with the limb passively placed 50 cm below the heart level, and leg weight (Archimedes principle) were measured at baseline, during increasing doses of the dihydropyridine amlodipine (5 and 10 mg UID each for 2 weeks), and after drug withdrawal in 10 hypertensive men."5.09Amlodipine, enalapril, and dependent leg edema in essential hypertension. ( Dell'Omo, G; Mariani, M; Melillo, E; Pedrinelli, R, 2000)
"The comparative antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of the angiotensin II receptor blocker candesartan cilexetil and the calcium channel blocker amlodipine were evaluated in an 8-week, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, forced-titration study in 251 adult patients (45% women, 16% black) with mild hypertension (stage 1)."5.09Comparative effects of candesartan cilexetil and amlodipine in patients with mild systemic hypertension. Comparison of Candesartan and Amlodipine for Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy (CASTLE) Study Investigators. ( Chrysant, SG; Harris, SM; Kloner, RA; Leidy, NK; Michelson, EL; Pool, JL; Prasad, R; Weinberger, M; Zyczynski, TM, 2001)
"All studies suggesting a lower incidence of edema on lacidipine than on amlodipine are based on subjective scoring."5.09Ankle edema formation during treatment with the calcium channel blockers lacidipine and amlodipine: a single-centre study. ( Andrésdóttir, MB; Huysmans, FT; Valk, IM; van de Bosch, WJ; van Hamersvelt, HW; van Helden, MJ, 2000)
"This community-based study assessed whether there were age, sex, or racial differences in response to amlodipine 5 to 10 mg once daily in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension."5.08Sex- and age-related antihypertensive effects of amlodipine. The Amlodipine Cardiovascular Community Trial Study Group. ( DiBona, GF; Gaffney, M; Kloner, RA; Sowers, JR; Wein, M, 1996)
"The present study aimed to assess the efficacy and tolerance of amlodipine (Norvasc-Pfizer) in the treatment of 152 patients with mild and moderate essential hypertension."5.08-Efficacy and safety of using amlodipine in treatment of mild and moderate essential hypertension-. ( Kokot, F; Kokot, M; Raszewska, J; Rychlik, G; Witkowicz, J, 1995)
"One hundred sixty-eight adult outpatients with mild to moderate hypertension were randomly allocated in double-blind fashion and equal number to receive 80 mg valsartan or 5 mg amlodipine for 12 weeks."5.08Valsartan, a new angiotensin II antagonist for the treatment of essential hypertension: a comparative study of the efficacy and safety against amlodipine. ( Bodin, F; Cardoni, O; Corea, L; Fogari, R; Innocenti, P; Meilenbrock, S; Porcellati, C; Provvidenza, M; Sullivan, J, 1996)
"5-10 mg) once daily was compared with atenolol (50-100 mg) once daily in patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension in a randomized, double-blind, parallel, placebo-controlled study."5.07Amlodipine versus atenolol in essential hypertension. ( Brobyn, R; Brown, RD; Frishman, WH; Johnson, BF; Reeves, RL; Wombolt, DG, 1994)
"In a multicentre crossover study of 97 patients with mild hypertension, the incidence and severity of adverse effects were observed during the first 14 days of treatment with amlodipine, nifedipine retard or placebo."5.07Early side-effects of antihypertensive therapy: comparison of amlodipine and nifedipine retard. ( Bremner, AD; Fell, PJ; Hosie, J; James, IG; Saul, PA; Taylor, SH, 1993)
"Use of amlodipine for treatment of arterial hypertension and stable coronary artery disease (CAD) is sometimes limited by occurrence of peripheral edema and headache."5.01Peripheral edema and headache associated with amlodipine treatment: a meta-analysis of randomized, placebo-controlled trials. ( Böhm, M; Mahfoud, F; Messerli, FH; Scholz, SS; Vukadinović, D; Weber, MA; Williams, B, 2019)
" Hypertensive Patients who were on amlodipine for at least 6 months and presented with pedal edema were enrolled for the study."4.02Cilnidipine for Amlodipine Induced Pedal Edema and its Anti-hypertensive Effect in a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital of Western Nepal. ( Kafle, RC; Maskey, A; Sapkota, S, 2021)
"In this case report, we describe a rare case of amlodipine induced massive ascites in a 30-year-old male with renal transplantation."3.96Amlodipine Induced Massive Ascites, a Rare Clinical Case. ( Arasan, SN; Cevher, SK; Dede, F; Yenigun, EC, 2020)
"Hereby, we report four paediatric cases with amlodipine-related generalised oedema."3.85Amlodipine: The double edged sword. ( Al-Nabhani, D; El-Naggari, M; Rabah, F, 2017)
"the Indonesian subset of the EXCITE (clinical EXperience of amlodIpine and valsarTan in hypErtension) study, which was a multinational, prospective, observational, open study in hypertensive patients treated with Aml/Val SPC for 26 weeks."3.81Clinical Effectiveness, Safety and Tolerability of Amlodipine/Valsartan in Hypertensive Patients: the Indonesian Subset of the EXCITE Study. ( Abdillah, A; Kalim, H; Setiawati, A, 2015)
"This prospective, open-label, postmarketing surveillance study enrolled adults with arterial hypertension (systolic BP >140 mmHg and/or diastolic BP >90 mmHg) who were prescribed antihypertensive therapy with single-pill combination amlodipine/valsartan 5/80, 5/160, or 10/160 mg once daily."3.78Amlodipine/valsartan single-pill combination: a prospective, observational evaluation of the real-life safety and effectiveness in the routine treatment of hypertension. ( Dongre, N; Karpov, Y; Sastravaha, K; Vigdorchik, A, 2012)
"To report a case of conjunctival chemosis and bipedal edema associated with amlodipine besylate antihypertensive medication."3.77Chronic conjunctival chemosis from amlodipine besylate (Norvasc). ( Bianciotto, C; Say, EA; Shields, CL; Shields, JA, 2011)
"Lower leg edema is a common side effect of amlodipine therapy, but is often unrecognized as a contributor to stasis dermatitis."3.75Stasis dermatitis as a complication of amlodipine therapy. ( Gosnell, AL; Nedorost, ST, 2009)
"To report a case of bilateral upper extremity edema associated with amlodipine use in a child."3.74Amlodipine-induced bilateral upper extremity edema. ( Ganeshalingham, A; Wong, W, 2007)
"To report a case of anasarca edema associated with amlodipine use."3.73Anasarca edema with amlodipine treatment. ( Arioğul, S; Cankurtaran, M; Halil, M; Sener, D; Yavuz, BB, 2005)
"0001), and a lower incidence of pedal edema and adverse events compared with amlodipine."2.80Efficacy and safety of perindopril arginine + amlodipine in hypertension. ( Bakris, GL; Elliott, WJ; Feldstein, JD; Whitmore, J, 2015)
" Both treatment groups had similar adverse event rates (35."2.76Comparative efficacy and safety of combination aliskiren/amlodipine and amlodipine monotherapy in African Americans with stage 2 hypertension. ( Black, HR; Hilkert, R; Israel, M; Izzo, J; Lee, J; Purkayastha, D; Sridharan, K; Weinberger, MH, 2011)
"The primary aim of this double-blind, parallel group trial was to compare incidence of newly occurring vasodilatory adverse events in elderly patients treated with recommended once-daily doses of felodipine extended release (ER) or amlodipine."2.69Improved tolerability of felodipine compared with amlodipine in elderly hypertensives: a randomised, double-blind study in 535 patients, focusing on vasodilatory adverse events. The International Study Group. ( Aldons, PM; Burgess, ED; Girerd, X; Morgan, TO; Rehn, L; Schaefer, RM; Singh, GP; Tilvis, R, 1998)
" Most adverse events were mild or moderate and the investigators' overall evaluation of tolerability was excellent or good for 91% of patients."2.67A study of the efficacy and safety of amlodipine for the treatment of hypertension in general practice. ( Varrone, J, 1991)
" Blood pressure measurements were taken at the end of the dosing interval to assess the antihypertensive efficacy of the two drugs."2.67At equipotent doses, isradipine is better tolerated than amlodipine in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension: a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study. ( De Keyser, P; Deblander, A; Hermans, L; Lesaffre, E; Scheys, I; Westelinck, KJ, 1994)
"Amlodipine treatment was associated with a slightly higher incidence of side effects compared with placebo, but most of this difference was the result of edema, which was usually well tolerated."2.66The safety of amlodipine. ( Osterloh, I, 1989)
" A systematic review of the literature revealed its most common adverse effects as: peripheral edema (depending on the dose of amlodipine, but attenuated by perindopril), cough, dizziness and hypotension."2.58Perindopril arginine and amlodipine besylate for hypertension: a safety evaluation. ( Bistrika, EA; Elliott, WJ, 2018)
" Head-to-head randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of 12 months minimum duration reporting comparative efficacy (changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressure) and safety (total adverse events and ankle oedema), were included."2.47Efficacy and safety profiles of manidipine compared with amlodipine: a meta-analysis of head-to-head trials. ( Laurent, S; Richy, FF, 2011)
"CCB-induced oedema is caused by increased capillary hydrostatic pressure that results from preferential dilation of pre-capillary vessels."2.45Mitigation of calcium channel blocker-related oedema in hypertension by antagonists of the renin-angiotensin system. ( de la Sierra, A, 2009)
"Amlodipine therapy was discontinued and oedema diminished markedly within 72 hours."1.39Generalised peripheral oedema associated with amlodipine therapy in two dogs. ( Creevy, KE; Ellis, AE; Scuderi, MA, 2013)
"A 35-year-old woman with a history of breast cancer, treated 3 years ago with surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy presented with a rapid onset of severe Raynaud's phenomenon."1.36Paraneoplastic Raynaud's phenomenon in a breast cancer survivor. ( Allen, D; Mittoo, S; Robinson, D, 2010)
"Although hypertension is common (30% of adults in the USA), its control to recommended blood pressure levels of under 140/90 mmHg remains low, at 36."1.35Amlodipine besylate/olmesartan medoximil fixed combination for the treatment of hypertension. ( Chrysant, SG, 2009)
"Edema is a common symptom in elderly patients and we frequently observe drug-induced edema."1.31[A case of severe systemic edema in an elderly hypertensive patient with systemic lupus erythematodes during long-term treatment with anti-hypertensive drugs]. ( Higaki, J; Iegushi, K; Maekawa, Y; Moriguchi, A; Ogihara, T; Ohishi, M; Orita, H; Rakugi, H; Sugimoto, K, 2001)
"To compare the effects of chronic administration of two dihydropyridines, nifedipine and amlodipine, and the non-dihydropyridine Ca2+ antagonist mibefradil on fluid filtration of large arteries and extravasation of albumin in spontaneously hypertensive rats."1.30Different effects of calcium antagonists on fluid filtration of large arteries and albumin permeability in spontaneously hypertensive rats. ( Koen, R; Lacolley, P; Levy, BI; Poitevin, P, 1998)

Research

Studies (76)

TimeframeStudies, this research(%)All Research%
pre-19902 (2.63)18.7374
1990's14 (18.42)18.2507
2000's30 (39.47)29.6817
2010's25 (32.89)24.3611
2020's5 (6.58)2.80

Authors

AuthorsStudies
Kafle, RC1
Sapkota, S1
Maskey, A1
Skovbjerg, BK1
Helgestad, OK1
Oxlund, CS1
Christensen, B1
Henriksen, JN1
Padhani, ZA1
Gangwani, MK1
Sadaf, A1
Hasan, B1
Colan, S1
Alvi, N1
Das, JK1
Arasan, SN1
Yenigun, EC1
Cevher, SK1
Dede, F1
Aung, TKK1
Chuah, TY1
Chua, MWJ1
Rabah, F1
El-Naggari, M1
Al-Nabhani, D1
Elliott, WJ2
Bistrika, EA1
Jeon, SY1
Lee, NR1
Yim, CY1
Vukadinović, D1
Scholz, SS1
Messerli, FH4
Weber, MA1
Williams, B1
Böhm, M1
Mahfoud, F1
Lin, TH1
Tsai, CD1
Pan, JP1
Hou, CJ1
Hsia, CH1
Tsai, JP1
Lai, WT1
Creevy, KE1
Scuderi, MA1
Ellis, AE1
Whitmore, J1
Feldstein, JD1
Bakris, GL1
Setiawati, A1
Kalim, H1
Abdillah, A1
Hatalova, K1
Pella, D1
Sidlo, R1
Hatala, R1
Galappatthy, P1
Waniganayake, YC1
Sabeer, MI1
Wijethunga, TJ1
Galappatthy, GK1
Ekanayaka, RA1
Maneshi, A1
Ravi, S1
Salehi, MR1
Hasannezhad, M1
Khalili, H1
Moes, AD1
Hesselink, DA1
van den Meiracker, AH1
Zietse, R1
Hoorn, EJ1
Haugh, MJ1
Miranda, RD1
Mion, D1
Rocha, JC1
Kohlmann, O1
Gomes, MA1
Saraiva, JF2
Amodeo, C1
Filho, BL1
de la Sierra, A1
Fujiwara, T1
Ii, Y1
Hatsuzawa, J1
Murase, H1
Watanabe, T1
Murakami, M1
Kimura, N1
Buch, J1
Tsuchihashi, T1
Saruta, T1
Schrader, J1
Salvetti, A1
Calvo, C1
Akpinar, E1
Keeling, L1
Weisskopf, M1
Brunel, P1
Gosnell, AL1
Nedorost, ST1
Rienzo, M1
Nogueira, PR1
Gomes, EP1
Moretti, MA1
Ferreira, JF1
Armagnajian, D1
Mansur, Ade P1
Ramires, JA1
César, LA1
Allen, D1
Robinson, D1
Mittoo, S1
Littlejohn, TW1
Majul, CR1
Olvera, R1
Seeber, M1
Kobe, M1
Guthrie, R1
Oigman, W2
Chrysant, SG2
Izzo, JL1
Purkayastha, D3
Hall, D1
Hilkert, RJ1
Fogari, R7
Malamani, G1
Corradi, L1
Mugellini, A6
Preti, P3
Zoppi, A5
Derosa, G5
Richy, FF1
Laurent, S1
Say, EA1
Shields, CL1
Bianciotto, C1
Shields, JA1
Sansanayudh, N1
Wongwiwatthananukit, S1
Veerayuthvilai, S1
Maffioli, P2
Lazzari, P3
Monti, C1
Black, HR1
Weinberger, MH1
Lee, J1
Sridharan, K1
Israel, M1
Hilkert, R1
Izzo, J1
Karpov, Y1
Dongre, N1
Vigdorchik, A1
Sastravaha, K1
Schoeller, DA1
Alon, A1
Manekas, D1
Mixson, LA1
Lasseter, KC1
Noonan, GP1
Bolognese, JA1
Heymsfield, SB1
Beals, CR1
Nunes, I1
Szabolcsi, O1
Nagy-Toldi, A1
Zeher, M1
Végh, J1
Oh, GC1
Lee, HY1
Kang, HJ1
Zo, JH1
Choi, DJ1
Oh, BH1
Mazza, A1
Gil-Extremera, B1
Maldonato, A1
Toutouzas, T1
Pessina, AC2
von Vigier, RO1
Fossali, E1
Edefonti, A1
Vogt, B1
Bianchetti, MG1
Leonetti, G1
Magnani, B1
Rappelli, A1
Trimarco, B1
Zanchetti, A1
Grossman, E1
Malamani, GD1
Rinaldi, A2
Vanasia, A1
Lund-Johansen, P1
Stranden, E1
Helberg, S1
Wessel-Aas, T1
Risberg, K1
Rønnevik, PK1
Istad, H1
Madsbu, S1
Pedrinelli, R2
Dell'Omo, G2
Nuti, M1
Menegato, A1
Balbarini, A1
Mariani, M2
Franco, RJ1
Goldflus, S1
McQuitty, M1
Jamerson, KA1
Nwose, O1
Jean-Louis, L1
Schofield, L1
Baron, M1
Sener, D1
Halil, M1
Yavuz, BB1
Cankurtaran, M1
Arioğul, S1
Fogari, E1
Philipp, T1
Smith, TR1
Glazer, R1
Wernsing, M1
Yen, J1
Jin, J1
Schneider, H1
Pospiech, R1
Ganeshalingham, A1
Wong, W1
Sharma, A1
Bagchi, A1
Kinagi, SB1
Sharma, YK1
Baliga, VP1
Bollmall, C1
Hermans, L1
Deblander, A1
De Keyser, P1
Scheys, I1
Lesaffre, E1
Westelinck, KJ1
Chahine, RA2
Feldman, RL2
Giles, TD2
Nicod, P2
Raizner, AE2
Weiss, RJ2
Vanov, SK1
Frishman, WH1
Brobyn, R1
Brown, RD1
Johnson, BF1
Reeves, RL1
Wombolt, DG1
Bremner, AD1
Fell, PJ1
Hosie, J1
James, IG1
Saul, PA1
Taylor, SH1
Kloner, RA2
Sowers, JR1
DiBona, GF1
Gaffney, M1
Wein, M1
Kokot, F1
Witkowicz, J1
Kokot, M1
Rychlik, G1
Raszewska, J1
Corea, L1
Cardoni, O1
Innocenti, P1
Porcellati, C1
Provvidenza, M1
Meilenbrock, S1
Sullivan, J1
Bodin, F1
Spratt, KA1
Massie, BM1
Lacourcière, Y1
Viskoper, R1
Woittiez, A1
Kobrin, I1
Lacolley, P1
Poitevin, P1
Koen, R1
Levy, BI1
Schaefer, RM1
Aldons, PM1
Burgess, ED1
Tilvis, R1
Girerd, X1
Singh, GP1
Rehn, L1
Morgan, TO1
Zambanini, A1
Padley, S1
Cox, A1
Feher, M1
Melillo, E1
Weinberger, M1
Pool, JL1
Prasad, R1
Harris, SM1
Zyczynski, TM1
Leidy, NK1
Michelson, EL1
Andrésdóttir, MB1
van Hamersvelt, HW1
van Helden, MJ1
van de Bosch, WJ1
Valk, IM1
Huysmans, FT1
Maekawa, Y1
Sugimoto, K1
Ohishi, M1
Moriguchi, A1
Rakugi, H1
Iegushi, K1
Orita, H1
Higaki, J1
Ogihara, T1
Hall, R1
Chong, C1
Weir, MR1
Neutel, JM1
Varrone, J1
Osterloh, I1

Clinical Trials (9)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
A 12 Weeks, Multi-center, Randomized, Open Label, Active Control, Phase IV Clinical Trial to Compare Evaluated Improvement of Edema Index, Safety and Efficacy of Amlodipine Versus S Amlodipine in Patients With Essential Hypertension[NCT04554303]80 participants (Anticipated)Observational2020-10-28Recruiting
Thiazide Diuretics for Hypertension in Kidney Transplant Recipients Using Tacrolimus[NCT02644395]Phase 349 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-18Completed
Pilot Study to Assess Blockade of Calcium Channels and Sodium Chloride Cotransporters for Physiologic Abnormalities in Liver Transplant Associated Hypertension[NCT05275907]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-07-12Withdrawn (stopped due to Screened participants did not meet inclusion criteria prior to study completion date)
A Double-blind, Randomized, Multicenter, Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Tolerability, and Safety of Treatment With the Combination of Valsartan/Amlodipine 160/5 mg Compared to Amlodipine 10 mg in Patients With Essential Hypertension Not Ad[NCT00437645]Phase 31,183 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-01-31Completed
Prevalence and Incidence of Dyskalemia in Hypertensive Patients Initiating a Fixed Dose Combination Pill of Telmisartan and Amlodipine[NCT05155436]Phase 41,090 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-01-15Completed
A 6-Week Multi-center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel Group Study Comparing the Efficacy of Amlodipine Besylate/Benazepril Versus Amlodipine in the Treatment of Severe Hypertension[NCT00136851]Phase 4259 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-12-31Completed
Manidipine Versus Amlodipine in Patients With Hypertension: Effects on Peripheral Edema Evaluated by Bioimpedance Analysis[NCT03106597]Phase 446 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-08-20Terminated (stopped due to Difficulty in enrolling subjects)
A Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Effects of Multiple Doses of Amlodipine 10 mg on Pedal Edema Measurements in Middle-Aged and Elderly Healthy Subjects and Patient With Hypertension[NCT00789321]Phase 147 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-07-31Completed
Fixed-Dose Combination of Perindopril/Amlodipine (Amlessa®) and Fixed-Dose Combination of Perindopril/Indapamide /Amlodipine (Co-Amlessa®) - Contribution to Management in Newly Diagnosed and Uncontrolled Hypertensive Patients[NCT03738761]Phase 4471 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-02-13Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

Change in Mean Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (msDBP) From Baseline to Week 8

Blood pressure (BP) was measured at trough (24±3 hours post-dose). The arm in which the highest sitting diastolic BP was found at study entry was used for all subsequent readings. If there was < 0. 5 mmHg difference in BP between the 2 arms, the non-dominant arm was used. At each visit, after the patient was in a sitting position with the back supported and both feet placed on the floor for 5 minutes, systolic and diastolic BP were measured 3 times with an automated BP monitor and appropriate size cuff. Means of the 3 measurements were calculated. A negative change indicates lowered BP. (NCT00437645)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 8

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Valsartan/Amlodipine 160/5 mg-4.65
Amlodipine 10 mg-4.13

Change in Mean Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure (msSBP) From Baseline to Week 8

Blood pressure (BP) was measured at trough (24±3 hours post-dose). The arm in which the highest sitting diastolic BP was found at study entry was used for all subsequent readings. If there was < 0. 5 mmHg difference in BP between the 2 arms, the non-dominant arm was used. At each visit, after the patient was in a sitting position with the back supported and both feet placed on the floor for 5 minutes, systolic and diastolic BP were measured 3 times with an automated BP monitor and appropriate size cuff. Means of the 3 measurements were calculated. A negative change indicates lowered BP. (NCT00437645)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 8

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Valsartan/Amlodipine 160/5 mg-8.01
Amlodipine 10 mg-6.30

Percentage of Patients With Peripheral Edema From Baseline to Week 8

Only occurrences of peripheral edema quantified as a reported adverse event coded as peripheral edema were included in the analysis. If a patient experienced more than one occurrence of peripheral edema between Day 1 and Week 8, it was only counted once in the analysis. (NCT00437645)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 8

InterventionPercentage of patients (Number)
Valsartan/Amlodipine 160/5 mg6.6
Amlodipine 10 mg31.1

Change in Mean Sitting Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure (msSBP, msDBP) From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, and 12

Blood pressure (BP) was measured at trough (24±3 hours post-dose). The arm in which the highest sitting diastolic BP was found at study entry was used for all subsequent readings. If there was < 0. 5 mmHg difference in BP between the 2 arms, the non-dominant arm was used. At each visit, after the patient was in a sitting position with the back supported and both feet placed on the floor for 5 minutes, systolic and diastolic BP were measured 3 times with an automated BP monitor and appropriate size cuff. Means of the 3 measurements were calculated. A negative change indicates lowered BP. (NCT00437645)
Timeframe: Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, and 12

,
InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
msSBP: Week 4 (n=576, 535)msSBP: Week 8 (n=567, 510)msSBP: Week 12 (n=569, 531)msDBP: Week 4 (n=576, 535)msDBP: Week 8 (n=576, 510)msDBP: Week 12 (n=569, 531)
Amlodipine 10 mg-6.48-6.11-7.82-4.23-3.97-4.90
Valsartan/Amlodipine 160/5 mg-8.40-8.15-9.08-5.05-4.68-5.50

Percentage of Patients Achieving a Systolic Response at Weeks 4, 8, and 12

Systolic response was defined as msSBP < 130 mmHg or at least a 20 mmHg reduction from baseline in msSBP at Weeks 4, 8, and 12. Blood pressure (BP) was measured at trough (24±3 hours post-dose). The arm in which the highest sitting diastolic BP was found at study entry was used for all subsequent readings. At each visit, after the patient was in a sitting position with the back supported and both feet placed on the floor for 5 minutes, systolic and diastolic BP were measured 3 times with an automated BP monitor and appropriate size cuff. Means of the 3 measurements were calculated. (NCT00437645)
Timeframe: Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, and 12

,
InterventionPercentage of patients (Number)
Week 4 (n=576, 535)Week 8 (n=567, 510)Week 12 (n=569, 531)
Amlodipine 10 mg25.4225.4931.26
Valsartan/Amlodipine 160/5 mg35.0734.2237.96

Change From Baseline in Foot Volume by Water Displacement (Weight of Water Displaced) at Week 2

Least Squares Mean Difference from Baseline (NCT00789321)
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 weeks

InterventionGrams (Least Squares Mean)
Amlodipine 10 Milligrams44.8
Placebo5.8

Change From Baseline in Segmental Bioimpedance Measurements at 10 Kilohertz (KHz) at Week 2

Segmental biomimpedance was measured using a multifrequency analyzer (ImpediMed SFB7). The device was used to measure impedance (measured in Ohms) of a small current traveling between leads placed at the ankle and knee. Least Squares Mean Difference from Baseline in impedance is the primary endpoint. (NCT00789321)
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 weeks

InterventionOhms (Least Squares Mean)
Amlodipine 10 Milligrams-7.9
Placebo3.8

Reviews

7 reviews available for amlodipine and Edema

ArticleYear
    Ugeskrift for laeger, 2023, Apr-17, Volume: 185, Issue:16

    Topics: Amlodipine; Ankle; Calcium Channel Blockers; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Edema;

2023
Calcium channel blockers for preventing cardiomyopathy due to iron overload in people with transfusion-dependent beta thalassaemia.
    The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2023, 11-17, Volume: 11

    Topics: Amlodipine; beta-Thalassemia; Calcium Channel Blockers; Cardiomyopathies; Child; Edema; Ferritins; H

2023
Perindopril arginine and amlodipine besylate for hypertension: a safety evaluation.
    Expert opinion on drug safety, 2018, Volume: 17, Issue:2

    Topics: Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Cough; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug C

2018
Peripheral edema and headache associated with amlodipine treatment: a meta-analysis of randomized, placebo-controlled trials.
    Journal of hypertension, 2019, Volume: 37, Issue:10

    Topics: Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Calcium Channel Blockers; Edema; Headache; Humans; Hypertension

2019
Mitigation of calcium channel blocker-related oedema in hypertension by antagonists of the renin-angiotensin system.
    Journal of human hypertension, 2009, Volume: 23, Issue:8

    Topics: Amlodipine; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antih

2009
Efficacy and safety profiles of manidipine compared with amlodipine: a meta-analysis of head-to-head trials.
    Blood pressure, 2011, Volume: 20, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Amlodipine; Ankle; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Dihydropyridines; Edema; Humans;

2011
Evolution of calcium antagonists: past, present, and future.
    Clinical cardiology, 2003, Volume: 26, Issue:2 Suppl 2

    Topics: Amlodipine; Calcium Channel Blockers; Diabetic Angiopathies; Edema; Humans; Hypertension; Hypertroph

2003

Trials

45 trials available for amlodipine and Edema

ArticleYear
Efficacy and tolerability between an olmesartan/amlodipine fixed-dose combination and an amlodipine double dose in mild to moderate hypertension.
    The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences, 2013, Volume: 29, Issue:5

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Drug Therapy, Combination; Edema;

2013
Efficacy and safety of perindopril arginine + amlodipine in hypertension.
    Journal of the American Society of Hypertension : JASH, 2015, Volume: 9, Issue:4

    Topics: Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Diabetes Mellitus; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combinati

2015
Leg edema with (S)-amlodipine vs conventional amlodipine given in triple therapy for hypertension: a randomized double blind controlled clinical trial.
    BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2016, 09-01, Volume: 16, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Amlodipine; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure

2016
Chlorthalidone Versus Amlodipine for Hypertension in Kidney Transplant Recipients Treated With Tacrolimus: A Randomized Crossover Trial.
    American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation, 2017, Volume: 69, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory; Chlorthalidone; Cr

2017
Chlorthalidone Versus Amlodipine for Hypertension in Kidney Transplant Recipients Treated With Tacrolimus: A Randomized Crossover Trial.
    American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation, 2017, Volume: 69, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory; Chlorthalidone; Cr

2017
Chlorthalidone Versus Amlodipine for Hypertension in Kidney Transplant Recipients Treated With Tacrolimus: A Randomized Crossover Trial.
    American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation, 2017, Volume: 69, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory; Chlorthalidone; Cr

2017
Chlorthalidone Versus Amlodipine for Hypertension in Kidney Transplant Recipients Treated With Tacrolimus: A Randomized Crossover Trial.
    American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation, 2017, Volume: 69, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory; Chlorthalidone; Cr

2017
An 18-week, prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study of amlodipine/ramipril combination versus amlodipine monotherapy in the treatment of hypertension: the assessment of combination therapy of amlodipine/ramipril (ATAR) study.
    Clinical therapeutics, 2008, Volume: 30, Issue:9

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Amlodipine; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pr

2008
The Phase III, double-blind, parallel-group controlled study of amlodipine 10 mg once daily in Japanese patients with essential hypertension who insufficiently responded to amlodipine 5 mg once daily.
    Journal of human hypertension, 2009, Volume: 23, Issue:8

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Calcium Channel Blockers; Dose-Res

2009
The combination of amlodipine/valsartan 5/160 mg produces less peripheral oedema than amlodipine 10 mg in hypertensive patients not adequately controlled with amlodipine 5 mg.
    International journal of clinical practice, 2009, Volume: 63, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged; Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Drug Combinations; Edema; Female; Humans; Hypertension; M

2009
Combination of amlodipine and enalapril in hypertensive patients with coronary disease.
    Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia, 2009, Volume: 92, Issue:3

    Topics: Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Coronary Disease; Drug Therapy, Combination; Ed

2009
Results of treatment with telmisartan-amlodipine in hypertensive patients.
    Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2009, Volume: 11, Issue:4

    Topics: Amlodipine; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Benzoa

2009
Comparative efficacy and safety of amlodipine/benazepril combination therapy and amlodipine monotherapy in severe hypertension.
    Journal of human hypertension, 2010, Volume: 24, Issue:6

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzazepines; Chron

2010
Effect of valsartan or olmesartan addition to amlodipine on ankle edema in hypertensive patients.
    Advances in therapy, 2010, Volume: 27, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Amlodipine; Ankle Joint; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Cross-Over Studies; D

2010
Comparison of changes of body water measured by using bioelectrical impedance analysis between lercanidipine and amlodipine therapy in hypertensive outpatients.
    Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet, 2010, Volume: 93 Suppl 6

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Body Composition; Body Water; Dihydrop

2010
Effect of aliskiren addition to amlodipine on ankle edema in hypertensive patients: a three-way crossover study.
    Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy, 2011, Volume: 12, Issue:9

    Topics: Amides; Amlodipine; Ankle; Ankle Joint; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Calcium Channel Blo

2011
Comparative efficacy and safety of combination aliskiren/amlodipine and amlodipine monotherapy in African Americans with stage 2 hypertension.
    Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2011, Volume: 13, Issue:8

    Topics: Adult; Amides; Amlodipine; Black or African American; Blood Pressure; Blood Pressure Monitoring, Amb

2011
Effect of telmisartan addition to amlodipine on ankle edema development in treating hypertensive patients.
    Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy, 2011, Volume: 12, Issue:16

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Amlodipine; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Ankle; Antihypertensive Agents; B

2011
Segmental bioimpedance for measuring amlodipine-induced pedal edema: a placebo-controlled study.
    Clinical therapeutics, 2012, Volume: 34, Issue:3

    Topics: Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Edema; Electric Impedance; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged

2012
Segmental bioimpedance for measuring amlodipine-induced pedal edema: a placebo-controlled study.
    Clinical therapeutics, 2012, Volume: 34, Issue:3

    Topics: Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Edema; Electric Impedance; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged

2012
Segmental bioimpedance for measuring amlodipine-induced pedal edema: a placebo-controlled study.
    Clinical therapeutics, 2012, Volume: 34, Issue:3

    Topics: Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Edema; Electric Impedance; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged

2012
Segmental bioimpedance for measuring amlodipine-induced pedal edema: a placebo-controlled study.
    Clinical therapeutics, 2012, Volume: 34, Issue:3

    Topics: Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Edema; Electric Impedance; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged

2012
Segmental bioimpedance for measuring amlodipine-induced pedal edema: a placebo-controlled study.
    Clinical therapeutics, 2012, Volume: 34, Issue:3

    Topics: Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Edema; Electric Impedance; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged

2012
Segmental bioimpedance for measuring amlodipine-induced pedal edema: a placebo-controlled study.
    Clinical therapeutics, 2012, Volume: 34, Issue:3

    Topics: Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Edema; Electric Impedance; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged

2012
Segmental bioimpedance for measuring amlodipine-induced pedal edema: a placebo-controlled study.
    Clinical therapeutics, 2012, Volume: 34, Issue:3

    Topics: Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Edema; Electric Impedance; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged

2012
Segmental bioimpedance for measuring amlodipine-induced pedal edema: a placebo-controlled study.
    Clinical therapeutics, 2012, Volume: 34, Issue:3

    Topics: Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Edema; Electric Impedance; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged

2012
Segmental bioimpedance for measuring amlodipine-induced pedal edema: a placebo-controlled study.
    Clinical therapeutics, 2012, Volume: 34, Issue:3

    Topics: Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Edema; Electric Impedance; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged

2012
Quantification of pedal edema during treatment with S(-)-amlodipine nicotinate versus amlodipine besylate in female Korean patients with mild to moderate hypertension: a 12-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, phase IV clinical
    Clinical therapeutics, 2012, Volume: 34, Issue:9

    Topics: Aged; Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Calcium Channel Blockers; Dose-Response R

2012
Nebivolol vs amlodipine as first-line treatment of essential arterial hypertension in the elderly.
    Blood pressure, 2002, Volume: 11, Issue:3

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzopyrans; Blood Pressure; Double-Bl

2002
Tolerability of long-term treatment with lercanidipine versus amlodipine and lacidipine in elderly hypertensives.
    American journal of hypertension, 2002, Volume: 15, Issue:11

    Topics: Aged; Amlodipine; Calcium Channel Blockers; Dihydropyridines; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Com

2002
Effect of benazepril addition to amlodipine on ankle oedema and subcutaneous tissue pressure in hypertensive patients.
    Journal of human hypertension, 2003, Volume: 17, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Amlodipine; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Ankle; Benzazepines; Calcium Chan

2003
Quantification of leg oedema in postmenopausal hypertensive patients treated with lercanidipine or amlodipine.
    Journal of hypertension, 2003, Volume: 21, Issue:5

    Topics: Aged; Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Blood Volume; Calcium Channel Blockers; D

2003
Heterogeneous effect of calcium antagonists on leg oedema: a comparison of amlodipine versus lercanidipine in hypertensive patients.
    Journal of hypertension, 2003, Volume: 21, Issue:10

    Topics: Adult; Amlodipine; Blood Pressure; Calcium Channel Blockers; Cross-Over Studies; Dihydropyridines; E

2003
Efficacy and tolerability of the combination valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide compared with amlodipine in a mild-to-moderately hypertensive Brazilian population.
    Blood pressure. Supplement, 2003, Volume: 2

    Topics: Aged; Amlodipine; Blood Pressure; Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory; Brazil; Double-Blind Method

2003
Initial angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/calcium channel blocker combination therapy achieves superior blood pressure control compared with calcium channel blocker monotherapy in patients with stage 2 hypertension.
    American journal of hypertension, 2004, Volume: 17, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Amlodipine; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzazep

2004
Effect of valsartan addition to amlodipine on ankle oedema and subcutaneous tissue pressure in hypertensive patients.
    Journal of human hypertension, 2007, Volume: 21, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Amlodipine; Ankle; Blood Pressure; Cross-Over Studies; Drug Therapy, Combi

2007
Two multicenter, 8-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group studies evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of amlodipine and valsartan in combination and as monotherapy in adult patients with mild to moderate essential hyperten
    Clinical therapeutics, 2007, Volume: 29, Issue:4

    Topics: Amlodipine; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Calcium Channel Blockers; Double-Blind Method;

2007
Efficacy and tolerability of candesartan cilexetil/hydrochlorothiazide and amlodipine in patients with poorly controlled mild-to-moderate essential hypertension.
    Journal of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system : JRAAS, 2007, Volume: 8, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Amlodipine; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Benzimidazoles;

2007
Results of a comparative, phase III, 12-week, multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind assessment of the efficacy and tolerability of a fixed-dose combination of telmisartan and amlodipine versus amlodipine monotherapy in Indian adults with stag
    Clinical therapeutics, 2007, Volume: 29, Issue:12

    Topics: Amlodipine; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Benzo

2007
At equipotent doses, isradipine is better tolerated than amlodipine in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension: a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study.
    British journal of clinical pharmacology, 1994, Volume: 38, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Amlodipine; Ankle; Belgium; Blood Pressure; Delayed-Action Preparations; Double-Blind M

1994
Randomized placebo-controlled trial of amlodipine in vasospastic angina. Amlodipine Study 160 Group.
    Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 1993, Volume: 21, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Amlodipine; Angina Pectoris, Variant; Double-Blind Method; Edema; Female; Humans; Male;

1993
Amlodipine versus atenolol in essential hypertension.
    The American journal of cardiology, 1994, Jan-27, Volume: 73, Issue:3

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Amlodipine; Atenolol; Blood Pressure; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administrat

1994
Early side-effects of antihypertensive therapy: comparison of amlodipine and nifedipine retard.
    Journal of human hypertension, 1993, Volume: 7, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Amlodipine; Delayed-Action Preparations; Dizziness; Double-Blind Method; Edema; Female;

1993
Sex- and age-related antihypertensive effects of amlodipine. The Amlodipine Cardiovascular Community Trial Study Group.
    The American journal of cardiology, 1996, Apr-01, Volume: 77, Issue:9

    Topics: Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Black People; Bloo

1996
-Efficacy and safety of using amlodipine in treatment of mild and moderate essential hypertension-.
    Polskie Archiwum Medycyny Wewnetrznej, 1995, Volume: 94, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Dizziness; Drug Administration Schedule; Edema; Fe

1995
Valsartan, a new angiotensin II antagonist for the treatment of essential hypertension: a comparative study of the efficacy and safety against amlodipine.
    Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 1996, Volume: 60, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Amlodipine; Angiotensin II; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Antihypertensive Agents;

1996
Mibefradil in the treatment of systemic hypertension: comparative studies with other calcium antagonists.
    The American journal of cardiology, 1997, Aug-21, Volume: 80, Issue:4B

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Amlodipine; Benzimidazoles; Calcium Channel Blockers; Diltiazem; Double-Blind Method; E

1997
Improved tolerability of felodipine compared with amlodipine in elderly hypertensives: a randomised, double-blind study in 535 patients, focusing on vasodilatory adverse events. The International Study Group.
    International journal of clinical practice, 1998, Volume: 52, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Delayed-Action Preparations; Dizziness; Double-Blind Meth

1998
Amlodipine, enalapril, and dependent leg edema in essential hypertension.
    Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979), 2000, Volume: 35, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Diastole; Dose-Response Relationsh

2000
Comparative effects of candesartan cilexetil and amlodipine in patients with mild systemic hypertension. Comparison of Candesartan and Amlodipine for Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy (CASTLE) Study Investigators.
    The American journal of cardiology, 2001, Mar-15, Volume: 87, Issue:6

    Topics: Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biphenyl Compounds; Blood Pressure; Calcium Cha

2001
Ankle edema formation during treatment with the calcium channel blockers lacidipine and amlodipine: a single-centre study.
    Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology, 2000, Volume: 35, Issue:3 Suppl 1

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Amlodipine; Ankle; Blood Pressure; Calcium Channel Blockers; Dihydropyridin

2000
A double-blind, parallel-group study of amlodipine versus long-acting nitrate in the management of elderly patients with stable angina.
    Cardiology, 2001, Volume: 96, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Amlodipine; Angina Pectoris; Blood Pressure; Calcium Channel Blockers; Dela

2001
Combination therapy of amlodipine/benazepril versus monotherapy of amlodipine in a practice-based setting.
    American journal of hypertension, 2002, Volume: 15, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Amlodipine; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Benzazepines; Calcium Channel Blo

2002
A study of the efficacy and safety of amlodipine for the treatment of hypertension in general practice.
    Postgraduate medical journal, 1991, Volume: 67 Suppl 5

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Amlodipine; Calcium Channel Blockers; Edema; Female; Headache; Human

1991
Efficacy and safety of amlodipine in vasospastic angina: an interim report of a multicenter, placebo-controlled trial. The Investigators of Study 160.
    American heart journal, 1989, Volume: 118, Issue:5 Pt 2

    Topics: Amlodipine; Angina Pectoris; Calcium Channel Blockers; Clinical Trials as Topic; Coronary Vasospasm;

1989
The safety of amlodipine.
    American heart journal, 1989, Volume: 118, Issue:5 Pt 2

    Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Aged; Amlodipine; Calcium Channel Blockers; Clinical Trials as Topic; D

1989

Other Studies

24 other studies available for amlodipine and Edema

ArticleYear
Cilnidipine for Amlodipine Induced Pedal Edema and its Anti-hypertensive Effect in a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital of Western Nepal.
    Journal of Nepal Health Research Council, 2021, Dec-15, Volume: 19, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Dihydropyridine

2021
Amlodipine Induced Massive Ascites, a Rare Clinical Case.
    Iranian journal of kidney diseases, 2020, Volume: 14, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Amlodipine; Ascites; Calcium Channel Blockers; Edema; Humans; Hypertension; Male

2020
More Than Meets the Eye: A Patient with Hand Swelling and Newly Diagnosed Diabetes Mellitus.
    The American journal of medicine, 2021, Volume: 134, Issue:11

    Topics: Aged; Amlodipine; Anemia; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Sedimentation; C-Reactive Protein; Diabetes

2021
Amlodipine: The double edged sword.
    Journal of paediatrics and child health, 2017, Volume: 53, Issue:6

    Topics: Age Factors; Amlodipine; Blood Pressure Determination; Calcium Channel Blockers; Child; Child, Presc

2017
Successful re-administration of Pazopanib in a patient with metastatic renal cell carcinoma and a history of Pazopanib-induced nephrotic syndrome: a case report.
    BMC nephrology, 2019, 01-03, Volume: 20, Issue:1

    Topics: Aged; Amlodipine; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma

2019
Generalised peripheral oedema associated with amlodipine therapy in two dogs.
    The Journal of small animal practice, 2013, Volume: 54, Issue:11

    Topics: Amlodipine; Animals; Antihypertensive Agents; Dog Diseases; Dogs; Edema; Female; Hypertension

2013
Clinical Effectiveness, Safety and Tolerability of Amlodipine/Valsartan in Hypertensive Patients: the Indonesian Subset of the EXCITE Study.
    Acta medica Indonesiana, 2015, Volume: 47, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Cough; Drug Combinations; Drug Sub

2015
Switching from a Free Association of Perindopril/Amlodipine to a Fixed-Dose Combination: Increased Antihypertensive Efficacy and Tolerability.
    Clinical drug investigation, 2016, Volume: 36, Issue:7

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Cohort Studies; Diabetes Mellitus,

2016
Nicolau Syndrome.
    Archives of Iranian medicine, 2017, Volume: 20, Issue:1

    Topics: Amlodipine; Ankle; Edema; Glucocorticoids; Heparin; Humans; Injections, Intramuscular; Male; Methylp

2017
Re: Amlodipine for migraine prophylaxis.
    Headache, 1999, Volume: 39, Issue:2

    Topics: Amlodipine; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Edema; Humans; Migraine Disorders; Time Factors; Vasod

1999
Stasis dermatitis as a complication of amlodipine therapy.
    Journal of drugs in dermatology : JDD, 2009, Volume: 8, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Calcium Channel Blockers; Carcinoma, B

2009
Paraneoplastic Raynaud's phenomenon in a breast cancer survivor.
    Rheumatology international, 2010, Volume: 30, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Amlodipine; Antibodies, Antinuclear; Antineoplastic Agents; Breast Neoplasms; Edema; Female;

2010
Amlodipine besylate/olmesartan medoximil fixed combination for the treatment of hypertension.
    Expert review of cardiovascular therapy, 2009, Volume: 7, Issue:8

    Topics: Aged; Amlodipine; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure;

2009
Chronic conjunctival chemosis from amlodipine besylate (Norvasc).
    Cornea, 2011, Volume: 30, Issue:5

    Topics: Aged; Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Chronic Disease; Conjunctival Diseases; Edema; Foot Disea

2011
Amlodipine/valsartan single-pill combination: a prospective, observational evaluation of the real-life safety and effectiveness in the routine treatment of hypertension.
    Advances in therapy, 2012, Volume: 29, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Amlodipine; Amlodipine, Valsartan Drug Combination; Antihypertensive

2012
[Systemic sclerosis in a patient suffering from breast cancer].
    Magyar onkologia, 2012, Volume: 56, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Amlodipine; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Breast Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Duct

2012
Cyclosporin enhances the tendency towards oedema and flushing noted on dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers.
    British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2002, Volume: 54, Issue:3

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Amlodipine; Calcium Channel Blockers; Child; Child, Preschool; Cyclosporine; Dihy

2002
Pedal edema--not all dihydropyridine calcium antagonists are created equal.
    American journal of hypertension, 2002, Volume: 15, Issue:11

    Topics: Amlodipine; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Calcium Channel Blockers; Edema; Humans; Hyper

2002
Anasarca edema with amlodipine treatment.
    The Annals of pharmacotherapy, 2005, Volume: 39, Issue:4

    Topics: Aged; Amlodipine; Edema; Female; Humans; Hypertension

2005
Amlodipine-induced bilateral upper extremity edema.
    The Annals of pharmacotherapy, 2007, Volume: 41, Issue:9

    Topics: Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Child; Edema; Female; Humans; Hypertension; Upper Extremity; Va

2007
Sex- and age-related antihypertensive effects of amlodipine.
    The American journal of cardiology, 1997, Mar-15, Volume: 79, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Aging; Amlodipine; Antihypertensive Agents; Edema; Female; Humans; Hypertension; Male; Middle

1997
Different effects of calcium antagonists on fluid filtration of large arteries and albumin permeability in spontaneously hypertensive rats.
    Journal of hypertension, 1998, Volume: 16, Issue:3

    Topics: Amlodipine; Animals; Benzimidazoles; Blood Pressure; Calcium Channel Blockers; Capillary Permeabilit

1998
Achilles tendonitis: an unusual complication of amlodipine therapy.
    Journal of human hypertension, 1999, Volume: 13, Issue:8

    Topics: Achilles Tendon; Amlodipine; Ankle; Antihypertensive Agents; Calcium Channel Blockers; Edema; Humans

1999
[A case of severe systemic edema in an elderly hypertensive patient with systemic lupus erythematodes during long-term treatment with anti-hypertensive drugs].
    Nihon Ronen Igakkai zasshi. Japanese journal of geriatrics, 2001, Volume: 38, Issue:5

    Topics: Aged; Amlodipine; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzimidazoles; Bipheny

2001