ambroxol has been researched along with 2019 Novel Coronavirus Disease in 9 studies
Ambroxol: A metabolite of BROMHEXINE that stimulates mucociliary action and clears the air passages in the respiratory tract. It is usually administered as the hydrochloride.
Excerpt | Relevance | Reference |
---|---|---|
"The pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is still underway." | 1.91 | Polypharmacology of ambroxol in the treatment of COVID-19. ( Chen, X; Chu, M; Dong, Y; Song, G; Wang, Y; Wang, Z; Xiao, R; Yang, M, 2023) |
" The advantages of the proposed method qualify it for routine analysis of the studied drugs either in single or co-formulated dosage form in quality control labs." | 1.91 | A quality-by-design eco-friendly UV-HPLC method for the determination of four drugs used to treat symptoms of common cold and COVID-19. ( Abdallah, NA; El-Brashy, AM; Fathy, ME; Ibrahim, FA; Tolba, MM, 2023) |
Timeframe | Studies, this research(%) | All Research% |
---|---|---|
pre-1990 | 0 (0.00) | 18.7374 |
1990's | 0 (0.00) | 18.2507 |
2000's | 0 (0.00) | 29.6817 |
2010's | 0 (0.00) | 24.3611 |
2020's | 9 (100.00) | 2.80 |
Authors | Studies |
---|---|
Wang, Z | 1 |
Yang, M | 1 |
Chen, X | 1 |
Xiao, R | 1 |
Dong, Y | 1 |
Chu, M | 1 |
Song, G | 1 |
Wang, Y | 1 |
Abdallah, NA | 1 |
Fathy, ME | 1 |
Tolba, MM | 1 |
El-Brashy, AM | 1 |
Ibrahim, FA | 1 |
Krysantieva, AI | 1 |
Voronina, JK | 1 |
Safin, DA | 1 |
Wang, W | 1 |
Zhou, Z | 1 |
Ding, S | 1 |
Yang, W | 1 |
Jin, W | 1 |
Chu, W | 1 |
Xu, Z | 1 |
Elgamasy, S | 1 |
Kamel, MG | 1 |
Ghozy, S | 1 |
Khalil, A | 1 |
Morra, ME | 1 |
Islam, SMS | 1 |
Takano, H | 1 |
Li, HY | 1 |
Zhang, CM | 1 |
Lv, YY | 1 |
Dai, WQ | 1 |
Xu, B | 1 |
Qi, XM | 1 |
Hörnich, BF | 1 |
Großkopf, AK | 1 |
Schlagowski, S | 1 |
Tenbusch, M | 1 |
Kleine-Weber, H | 1 |
Neipel, F | 1 |
Stahl-Hennig, C | 1 |
Hahn, AS | 1 |
O'Byrne, L | 1 |
Webster, KE | 1 |
MacKeith, S | 1 |
Philpott, C | 1 |
Hopkins, C | 1 |
Burton, MJ | 1 |
Trial | Phase | Enrollment | Study Type | Start Date | Status | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Smell in Covid-19 and Efficacy of Nasal Theophylline[NCT04789499] | Phase 2 | 51 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2021-03-15 | Completed | ||
Efficacy and Safety of Phototherapy in the Treatment of Loss of Smell Post Acute Infection of Coronavirus 19[NCT05177445] | 40 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2022-04-30 | Not yet recruiting | |||
Coronavirus Disease 2019- Using Ascorbic Acid and Zinc Supplementation (COVIDAtoZ) Research Study A Randomized, Open Label Single Center Study[NCT04342728] | 214 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2020-04-08 | Completed | |||
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024] |
The SF-36 is a well-established 36-item questionnaire evaluating physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical health problems, role limitations due to personal or emotional problems, emotional well-being, social functioning, energy/fatigue, and general health perceptions. This test allows us to study the overall quality of life for those suffering from COVID-19 related OD. There is no single overall score for SF-36. The SF 36 generates 8 subscales with scores ranging from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). General health domain scores are reported here. (NCT04789499)
Timeframe: Baseline assessment
Intervention | score on a scale (Median) |
---|---|
Theophylline | 75 |
Placebo | 80 |
Questionnaire for Olfactory Dysfunction (QOD) assesses health-related quality of life of participants based on four factors such as eating, mental health, social interactions, or fear of dysfunction.. The survey also includes questions on parosmia, a phenomena of COVID-related OD. The QOD consists of 17 statements that participants score from 0-3, resulting in a total score from 0 to 51. Higher scores reflect better olfactory-specific QOL. (NCT04789499)
Timeframe: Comparison at 6 weeks post-intervention from baseline
Intervention | score on a scale (Median) |
---|---|
Theophylline | 0.86 |
Placebo | 1.43 |
The ODOR is a 28-item QOL instrument with a total score ranging from 0 to 112 points. Higher scores indicate worse QOL with higher degree of dysfunction and limitation. A decrease of 15 or more points is deemed to be a clinically significant improvement in QOL. (NCT04789499)
Timeframe: Comparison of response rate at 6 weeks post-intervention from baseline between the 2 study groups
Intervention | score on a scale (Median) |
---|---|
Theophylline | -6.5 |
Placebo | -4.5 |
"UPSIT 0-40 with higher scores indicating better smell.~This test is an objective, clinically validated 40-question forced-choice odor identification test where microencapsulated odorants on a strip are released by scratching. Out of a total of 40 points, normosmia is defined as ≥34 for males and ≥35 for females, and an increase in ≥4 points will be deemed a clinically significant improvement in symptoms." (NCT04789499)
Timeframe: Comparison at 6 weeks post-intervention from baseline
Intervention | score on a scale (Median) |
---|---|
Theophylline | 3 |
Placebo | 0 |
"UPSIT 0-40 with higher scores indicating better results.~The response rate defined as the number of participants in each group self-reporting of at least slightly better improvement in the Clinical Global Improvement Scale at 6 weeks post intervention as compared to baseline, devided by the total number of participants in that specific group. The CGI-Improvement Scale has seven response options (from 1 as Very Much Improved to 7 as Very Much Worsened) for answers to the question Compared to your sense of smell before you started the nasal irrigations, how would you rate your sense of smell now . Participants reporting 3 as Minimally Improved, 2 as Much Improved, or 1 as Very Much Improved in the CGI-I will be deemed responders to treatment, and the rate of responders will be compared between the two arms." (NCT04789499)
Timeframe: Comparison of response rate at 6 weeks post-intervention from baseline between the 2 study groups
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Theophylline | 59 |
Placebo | 43 |
1 review available for ambroxol and 2019 Novel Coronavirus Disease
Article | Year |
---|---|
Interventions for the treatment of persistent post-COVID-19 olfactory dysfunction.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Ambroxol; Betamethasone; Bias; COVID-19; Expectorants; Glucocorticoids; Humans | 2021 |
Interventions for the treatment of persistent post-COVID-19 olfactory dysfunction.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Ambroxol; Betamethasone; Bias; COVID-19; Expectorants; Glucocorticoids; Humans | 2021 |
Interventions for the treatment of persistent post-COVID-19 olfactory dysfunction.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Ambroxol; Betamethasone; Bias; COVID-19; Expectorants; Glucocorticoids; Humans | 2021 |
Interventions for the treatment of persistent post-COVID-19 olfactory dysfunction.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Ambroxol; Betamethasone; Bias; COVID-19; Expectorants; Glucocorticoids; Humans | 2021 |
Interventions for the treatment of persistent post-COVID-19 olfactory dysfunction.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Ambroxol; Betamethasone; Bias; COVID-19; Expectorants; Glucocorticoids; Humans | 2021 |
Interventions for the treatment of persistent post-COVID-19 olfactory dysfunction.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Ambroxol; Betamethasone; Bias; COVID-19; Expectorants; Glucocorticoids; Humans | 2021 |
Interventions for the treatment of persistent post-COVID-19 olfactory dysfunction.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Ambroxol; Betamethasone; Bias; COVID-19; Expectorants; Glucocorticoids; Humans | 2021 |
Interventions for the treatment of persistent post-COVID-19 olfactory dysfunction.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Ambroxol; Betamethasone; Bias; COVID-19; Expectorants; Glucocorticoids; Humans | 2021 |
Interventions for the treatment of persistent post-COVID-19 olfactory dysfunction.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Ambroxol; Betamethasone; Bias; COVID-19; Expectorants; Glucocorticoids; Humans | 2021 |
8 other studies available for ambroxol and 2019 Novel Coronavirus Disease
Article | Year |
---|---|
Polypharmacology of ambroxol in the treatment of COVID-19.
Topics: Ambroxol; COVID-19; COVID-19 Drug Treatment; Humans; Leukocytes, Mononuclear; Polypharmacology; SARS | 2023 |
A quality-by-design eco-friendly UV-HPLC method for the determination of four drugs used to treat symptoms of common cold and COVID-19.
Topics: Acetaminophen; Ambroxol; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Common Cold; COVID-19; Humans; Phenyl | 2023 |
A Novel Ambroxol-Derived Tetrahydroquinazoline with a Potency against SARS-CoV-2 Proteins.
Topics: Ambroxol; Coronavirus Papain-Like Proteases; COVID-19; Humans; Molecular Docking Simulation; Quinazo | 2023 |
Degradation kinetics and formation of regulated and emerging disinfection by-products during chlorination of two expectorants ambroxol and bromhexine.
Topics: Ambroxol; Bromhexine; Bromine; Chlorides; Chlorine; COVID-19; Disinfectants; Disinfection; Expectora | 2023 |
First case of focal epilepsy associated with SARS-coronavirus-2.
Topics: Acetaminophen; Acetylcysteine; Aged; Ambroxol; Anticonvulsants; Cough; COVID-19; COVID-19 Drug Treat | 2020 |
Pulmonary surfactant itself must be a strong defender against SARS-CoV-2.
Topics: Ambroxol; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2; Bromhexine; Clinical Trials as Topic; COVID-19; COVID-19 | 2020 |
Value of chest imaging in the newborn with suspected COVID-19.
Topics: Ambroxol; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Ascorbic Acid; Breast Feeding; C-Reactive Protein; COVID-19; COVID- | 2020 |
SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV Spike-Mediated Cell-Cell Fusion Differ in Their Requirements for Receptor Expression and Proteolytic Activation.
Topics: Ambroxol; Amino Acid Substitution; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2; Bromhexine; Cell Line; COVID-19; | 2021 |