amantadine has been researched along with Long Sleeper Syndrome in 10 studies
amant: an antiviral compound consisting of an adamantane derivative chemically linked to a water-solube polyanioic matrix; structure in first source
Excerpt | Relevance | Reference |
---|---|---|
" In separate studies, drugs were administered at a dosage of 200 mg/day (52 volunteers) or 300 mg/day (196 volunteers) for 4." | 2.65 | Comparative toxicity of amantadine hydrochloride and rimantadine hydrochloride in healthy adults. ( Adams, KF; Giordani, B; Gwaltney, JM; Hayden, FG; Van de Castle, RL, 1981) |
Timeframe | Studies, this research(%) | All Research% |
---|---|---|
pre-1990 | 6 (60.00) | 18.7374 |
1990's | 0 (0.00) | 18.2507 |
2000's | 2 (20.00) | 29.6817 |
2010's | 2 (20.00) | 24.3611 |
2020's | 0 (0.00) | 2.80 |
Authors | Studies |
---|---|
McQueen, R | 1 |
O'Shanick, GJ | 1 |
Stacy, M | 1 |
Meehan, WP | 1 |
Benbir, G | 1 |
Ozekmekçi, S | 1 |
Cinar, M | 1 |
Beskardes, F | 1 |
Apaydin, H | 1 |
Erginöz, E | 1 |
Flaherty, JA | 1 |
Bellur, SN | 1 |
Hayden, FG | 1 |
Gwaltney, JM | 1 |
Van de Castle, RL | 1 |
Adams, KF | 1 |
Giordani, B | 1 |
Reveno, WS | 1 |
Bauer, RB | 1 |
Rosenbaum, H | 1 |
Holmsen, R | 1 |
Paini, GP | 1 |
Passoni, M | 1 |
Smorodintsev, AA | 1 |
Karpuhin, GI | 1 |
Zlydnikov, DM | 1 |
Malyseva, AM | 1 |
Svecova, EG | 1 |
Burov, SA | 1 |
Hramcova, LM | 1 |
Romanov, JA | 1 |
Taros, LJ | 1 |
Ivannikov, JG | 1 |
Novoselov, SD | 1 |
Trial | Phase | Enrollment | Study Type | Start Date | Status | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Transcranial LED Therapy for the Treatment of Chronic Mild Traumatic Brain Injury[NCT02383472] | 53 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2012-09-30 | Completed | |||
Open-Label Safety Study of ADS-5102 (Amantadine HCl) Extended Release Capsules for the Treatment of Levodopa Induced Dyskinesia (LID)[NCT02202551] | Phase 3 | 223 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2014-07-31 | Completed | ||
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024] |
This measure indicates the mean differences in Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEF) tests between entry into the study and 3 weeks and entry into the study and 6 weeks for both the LED group and the placebo group. The mean difference is calculated by taking the mean of differences of the entry scores minus the 3 week scores and the entry scores minus the 6 week scores. D-KEFs color-word interferences, made up of color naming, word reading, and inhibition, is measured in seconds, a smaller number represents a better outcome. Participants were given 90 seconds to complete color naming and word reading and 180 seconds to complete inhibition. D-KEFs trail making test, made up of number sequencing, letter sequencing, and number-letter sequencing, is measured in seconds, a faster speed (lower number) represents a better outcome. Participants were given 150 seconds to complete number and letter sequencing and 240 seconds to complete number-letter sequencing. (NCT02383472)
Timeframe: From baseline to 3 weeks and from baseline to 6 weeks
Intervention | Seconds (Mean) | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D-KEFs Color Naming - 3 Weeks | D-KEFs Color Naming - 6 Weeks | D-KEFs Word Reading - 3 Weeks | D-KEFs Word Reading - 6 Weeks | D-KEFs Inhibition - 3 Weeks | D-KEFs Inhibition - 6 Weeks | D-KEFs Number Sequencing - 3 weeks | D-KEFs Letter Sequencing- 3 weeks | D-KEFs Number-Letter Sequencing- 3 weeks | D-KEFs Number Sequencing - 6 weeks | D-KEFs Letter Sequencing- 6 weeks | D-KEFs Number-Letter Sequencing- 6 weeks | |
MedX Health Console Model 1100 | 3.27 | 3.76 | 0.95 | 1.71 | 7.64 | 32.62 | -24.45 | -28.41 | 8.00 | 11.33 | 6.86 | 12.95 |
MedX Health Console Model 1100-placebo | 4.76 | 4.07 | 4.07 | 3.44 | 4.48 | 31.59 | -21.17 | -19.51 | 21.93 | 6.89 | 10.59 | 19.81 |
This measure indicates the mean differences in Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEF) tests between entry into the study and 3 weeks and entry into the study and 6 weeks for both the LED group and the placebo group. The mean difference is calculated by taking the mean of differences of the entry scores minus the 3 week scores and the entry scores minus the 6 week scores. D-KEFs Verbal Fluency Test, made up of letter fluency and category fluency, is measured by number of responses, a larger number represents a better outcome. Participants were given 60 seconds to complete each fluency test. (NCT02383472)
Timeframe: From baseline to 3 weeks and from baseline to 6 weeks
Intervention | Correct responses (Mean) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
D-KEFs Verbal Fluency- letters 3 weeks | D-KEFs Verbal Fluency- letters 6 weeks | D-KEFs Verbal Fluency- category 3 weeks | D-KEFs Verbal Fluency- category 6 weeks | |
MedX Health Console Model 1100 | -3.45 | -6.71 | -1.14 | -1.62 |
MedX Health Console Model 1100-placebo | -6.10 | -9.89 | -0.03 | -2.00 |
The primary outcome is mean difference on composite scores of Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) between entry into the study and completion of treatment (visit 18, week 6) for both the LED group and the placebo group. The mean difference is calculated by taking the mean of differences of the entry scores minus the 6 week scores. There are 5 composite scores on the ImPACT test; verbal memory, visual memory, visual motor speed, reaction time, and symptom score. The ranges for these subscales are as follows: verbal memory and visual memory: 0-100, visual motor speed: 0-60, reaction time: 0-1.0, and symptom score: 0-132. A higher verbal memory, visual memory, and visual motor speed represent a better outcome, while a lower reaction time and lower symptom score represent a better outcome. (NCT02383472)
Timeframe: From baseline to 6 weeks
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Verbal Memory | Visual Memory | Visual Motor Speed | Reaction Time | Symptom Score | |
MedX Health Console Model 1100 | -0.9 | 3.52 | -2.04 | -0.001 | 10.14 |
MedX Health Console Model 1100-placebo | -5.78 | -7.26 | -5.15 | 0.030 | 11.44 |
"This measure indicates the mean difference in total cognitive symptom scores between entry into the study and 3 weeks and entry into the study and 6 weeks for both the LED group and the placebo group. The mean difference is calculated by taking the mean of differences of the entry scores minus the 3 week scores and the entry scores minus the 6 weeks scores. The total cognitive symptom scored is a sum of 7 symptom scores from the PCSS; feeling slowed down, feeling like in a fog, don't feel right, difficulty concentrating, difficulty remembering, fatigue or low energy, and confusion. The severity of these symptoms are scored 0-6, 0=none, 6=severe. The range for the total cognitive symptom score is 0-42, a lower score represents a better outcome." (NCT02383472)
Timeframe: From baseline to 3 weeks and from baseline to 6 weeks
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Cognitive Sx Score - 3 Weeks | Cognitive Sx Score - 6 Weeks | |
MedX Health Console Model 1100 | 3.95 | 4.00 |
MedX Health Console Model 1100-placebo | 1.31 | 5.00 |
This measure indicates the mean differences in total post concussion symptom score (PCSS) between entry into the study and 3 weeks and entry into the study and 6 weeks for both the LED group and the placebo group. The mean difference is calculated by taking the mean of differences of the entry scores minus the 3 week scores and the entry scores minus the 6 week scores. The PCSS is a sum of severity scores from 0-6 (0=none, 6=severe) for 22 individual symptoms, like headache, neck pain, or drowsiness. The range for the PCSS is 0-132, a lower score represents a better outcome. (NCT02383472)
Timeframe: From baseline to 3 weeks and from baseline to 6 weeks
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
PCSS Total Score - 3 Weeks | PCSS Total score - 6 Weeks | |
MedX Health Console Model 1100 | 9.41 | 7.86 |
MedX Health Console Model 1100-placebo | 7.03 | 14.63 |
"To evaluate clinical progression of PD as assessed by the MDS-UPDRS, combined score, Parts I, II, and III.~Part I - non-motor experiences of daily living; Part II - motor experiences of daily living; Part III - motor examination. Parts I and II each contain 13 questions measured on a 5-point scale (0-4). Part III contains 18 objective rater assessments of the motor signs of PD measured on a 5-point scale (0-4).~Total range for combined score (Part I-III) is = 0-176. Generally for MDS-UPDRS scores and sub-scores, the lower the score, the better.~Parts I, II, and III are summed to make the total score." (NCT02202551)
Timeframe: Up to 101 weeks. MDS-UPDRS was performed at the following visits: Screening, Week 8, Week 16, Week 28, Week 40, Week 52, Week 64, Week 76, Week 88, Week 100 (or ET).
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline | Change from Baseline at Week 8 | Change from Baseline at Week 16 | Change from Baseline at Week 28 | Change from Baseline at Week 40 | Change from Baseline at Week 52 | Change from Baseline at Week 64 | Change from Baseline at Week 76 | Change from Baseline at Week 88 | Change from Baseline at Week 100 | |
ADS-5102 1A | 41.8 | 1.2 | 1.6 | 4.8 | 7.5 | 13.2 | 8.8 | 11.7 | 11.3 | 11.4 |
ADS-5102 Group 1P | 45.6 | -2.8 | -1.4 | 1.5 | -0.4 | 2.6 | 2.6 | 7.3 | 3.7 | 3.7 |
ADS-5102 Group 2 | 52.8 | 0.8 | 5.7 | 6.5 | 1.6 | 6.1 | 6.1 | 9.4 | 6.4 | 6.5 |
ADS-5102 Group 3 | 52.4 | -5.3 | -5.2 | -5.3 | -4.8 | -4.6 | -4.6 | -4.9 | 0.9 | 4.1 |
"This component (Questions 4.1 - 4.6) includes time spent with dyskinesia, functional impact of dyskinesia, time spent in OFF state, functional impact of fluctuations, complexity of motor fluctuations, painful OFF-state dystonia. Questions 4.1-4.6 are summed to make the Part IV score.~Generally for MDS-UPDRS scores and sub-scores, the lower the score, the better. Total range for Part IV is = 0-24" (NCT02202551)
Timeframe: 100 Weeks. MDS-UPDRS was performed at the following visits: Screening, Week 8, Week 16, Week 28, Week 40, Week 52, Week 64, Week 76, Week 88, Week 100 (or ET).
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline | Change in Baseline from Week 8 | Change in Baseline from Week 16 | Change from Baseline at Week 28 | Change from Baseline at Week 40 | Change from Baseline at Week 52 | Change from Baseline at Week 64 | Change from Baseline at Week 76 | Change from Baseline at Week 88 | Change from Baseline at Week 100 | |
Group 1a | 6.5 | -0.2 | -0.8 | -0.3 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 0.4 |
Group 1P | 9.6 | -3.4 | -3.2 | -3.3 | -2.8 | -2.9 | -3.3 | -2.9 | -2.8 | -2.4 |
Group 2 | 9.8 | -3.6 | -1.1 | -1.4 | -2.9 | -2.5 | -1.9 | -2.7 | -3.7 | -3.6 |
Group 3 | 10.4 | -4.0 | -3.9 | -4.4 | -4.7 | -3.6 | -2.5 | -3.7 | -4.3 | -3.6 |
The primary objective of the study was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of ADS-5102 oral capsules, an extended release (ER) formulation of amantadine, administered at a dose of 340 mg once daily at bedtime for the treatment of levodopa-induced dyskinesia (LID) in subjects with Parkinson's disease (PD). (NCT02202551)
Timeframe: Up to 101 weeks
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AE | Study drug-related AE | SAEs | Permanent discontinuation due to AE | Permanent discontinuation due to drug-related AE | Mild AEs | Moderate AEs | Mild drug-related AE | Moderate drug-related AE | Severe drug-related AE | |
Group 1a | 57 | 31 | 16 | 12 | 4 | 12 | 25 | 16 | 12 | 3 |
Group 1P | 70 | 45 | 21 | 21 | 15 | 13 | 36 | 15 | 23 | 7 |
Group 2 | 23 | 16 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 13 | 3 | 12 | 1 |
Group 3 | 55 | 32 | 17 | 10 | 8 | 11 | 26 | 5 | 22 | 5 |
2 reviews available for amantadine and Long Sleeper Syndrome
Article | Year |
---|---|
Facilitation of functional independence after neurotrauma: strategies for increasing physiologic readiness.
Topics: Amantadine; Analgesia; Brain Injuries; Dehydration; Dietary Supplements; Dopamine Agents; Frontal Lo | 2014 |
Medical therapies for concussion.
Topics: Amantadine; Analgesics, Non-Narcotic; Antiparkinson Agents; Athletic Injuries; Brain Concussion; Bra | 2011 |
2 trials available for amantadine and Long Sleeper Syndrome
Article | Year |
---|---|
Comparative toxicity of amantadine hydrochloride and rimantadine hydrochloride in healthy adults.
Topics: Adamantane; Adult; Amantadine; Central Nervous System Diseases; Gastrointestinal Diseases; Humans; M | 1981 |
The prophylactic effectiveness of amantadine hydrochloride in an epidemic of Hong Kong influenza in Leningrad in 1969.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Amantadine; Disease Outbreaks; Humans; Influenza, Human; Male; Placebos; Sleep Wa | 1970 |
6 other studies available for amantadine and Long Sleeper Syndrome
Article | Year |
---|---|
Medical treatment of Parkinson disease.
Topics: Amantadine; Antiparkinson Agents; Catechol O-Methyltransferase Inhibitors; Cognition Disorders; Corp | 2009 |
Features associated with the development of hallucinations in Parkinson's disease.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Amantadine; Antiparkinson Agents; Brain; Cholinergic Antagonists; Do | 2006 |
Mental side effects of amantadine therapy: its spectrum and characteristics in a normal population.
Topics: Adult; Affect; Age Factors; Aged; Amantadine; Humans; Memory; Mental Processes; Middle Aged; Personn | 1981 |
L-dopa for parkinsonism.
Topics: Aged; Amantadine; Depression; Dihydroxyphenylalanine; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hallucinations; Hum | 1973 |
[Amantadine treatment in parkinsonism].
Topics: Administration, Oral; Amantadine; Anxiety; Hallucinations; Humans; Parkinson Disease; Sleep Wake Dis | 1973 |
[Results obtained with L-DOPA and amantadine in the treatment of patients with disorders of consciousness and of the vigilant state].
Topics: Adult; Aged; Amantadine; Attention; Brain Diseases; Brain Injuries; Brain Neoplasms; Cognition Disor | 1973 |