Page last updated: 2024-10-22

amantadine and Long Sleeper Syndrome

amantadine has been researched along with Long Sleeper Syndrome in 10 studies

amant: an antiviral compound consisting of an adamantane derivative chemically linked to a water-solube polyanioic matrix; structure in first source

Research Excerpts

ExcerptRelevanceReference
" In separate studies, drugs were administered at a dosage of 200 mg/day (52 volunteers) or 300 mg/day (196 volunteers) for 4."2.65Comparative toxicity of amantadine hydrochloride and rimantadine hydrochloride in healthy adults. ( Adams, KF; Giordani, B; Gwaltney, JM; Hayden, FG; Van de Castle, RL, 1981)

Research

Studies (10)

TimeframeStudies, this research(%)All Research%
pre-19906 (60.00)18.7374
1990's0 (0.00)18.2507
2000's2 (20.00)29.6817
2010's2 (20.00)24.3611
2020's0 (0.00)2.80

Authors

AuthorsStudies
McQueen, R1
O'Shanick, GJ1
Stacy, M1
Meehan, WP1
Benbir, G1
Ozekmekçi, S1
Cinar, M1
Beskardes, F1
Apaydin, H1
Erginöz, E1
Flaherty, JA1
Bellur, SN1
Hayden, FG1
Gwaltney, JM1
Van de Castle, RL1
Adams, KF1
Giordani, B1
Reveno, WS1
Bauer, RB1
Rosenbaum, H1
Holmsen, R1
Paini, GP1
Passoni, M1
Smorodintsev, AA1
Karpuhin, GI1
Zlydnikov, DM1
Malyseva, AM1
Svecova, EG1
Burov, SA1
Hramcova, LM1
Romanov, JA1
Taros, LJ1
Ivannikov, JG1
Novoselov, SD1

Clinical Trials (2)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
Transcranial LED Therapy for the Treatment of Chronic Mild Traumatic Brain Injury[NCT02383472]53 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-09-30Completed
Open-Label Safety Study of ADS-5102 (Amantadine HCl) Extended Release Capsules for the Treatment of Levodopa Induced Dyskinesia (LID)[NCT02202551]Phase 3223 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-07-31Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

Mean Difference in Change in Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEF) Color-Word Interference and Trail Making Test Performance at Weeks 3 and 6.

This measure indicates the mean differences in Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEF) tests between entry into the study and 3 weeks and entry into the study and 6 weeks for both the LED group and the placebo group. The mean difference is calculated by taking the mean of differences of the entry scores minus the 3 week scores and the entry scores minus the 6 week scores. D-KEFs color-word interferences, made up of color naming, word reading, and inhibition, is measured in seconds, a smaller number represents a better outcome. Participants were given 90 seconds to complete color naming and word reading and 180 seconds to complete inhibition. D-KEFs trail making test, made up of number sequencing, letter sequencing, and number-letter sequencing, is measured in seconds, a faster speed (lower number) represents a better outcome. Participants were given 150 seconds to complete number and letter sequencing and 240 seconds to complete number-letter sequencing. (NCT02383472)
Timeframe: From baseline to 3 weeks and from baseline to 6 weeks

,
InterventionSeconds (Mean)
D-KEFs Color Naming - 3 WeeksD-KEFs Color Naming - 6 WeeksD-KEFs Word Reading - 3 WeeksD-KEFs Word Reading - 6 WeeksD-KEFs Inhibition - 3 WeeksD-KEFs Inhibition - 6 WeeksD-KEFs Number Sequencing - 3 weeksD-KEFs Letter Sequencing- 3 weeksD-KEFs Number-Letter Sequencing- 3 weeksD-KEFs Number Sequencing - 6 weeksD-KEFs Letter Sequencing- 6 weeksD-KEFs Number-Letter Sequencing- 6 weeks
MedX Health Console Model 11003.273.760.951.717.6432.62-24.45-28.418.0011.336.8612.95
MedX Health Console Model 1100-placebo4.764.074.073.444.4831.59-21.17-19.5121.936.8910.5919.81

Mean Difference in Change in Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEF) Verbal Fluency Performance at Weeks 3 and 6.

This measure indicates the mean differences in Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEF) tests between entry into the study and 3 weeks and entry into the study and 6 weeks for both the LED group and the placebo group. The mean difference is calculated by taking the mean of differences of the entry scores minus the 3 week scores and the entry scores minus the 6 week scores. D-KEFs Verbal Fluency Test, made up of letter fluency and category fluency, is measured by number of responses, a larger number represents a better outcome. Participants were given 60 seconds to complete each fluency test. (NCT02383472)
Timeframe: From baseline to 3 weeks and from baseline to 6 weeks

,
InterventionCorrect responses (Mean)
D-KEFs Verbal Fluency- letters 3 weeksD-KEFs Verbal Fluency- letters 6 weeksD-KEFs Verbal Fluency- category 3 weeksD-KEFs Verbal Fluency- category 6 weeks
MedX Health Console Model 1100-3.45-6.71-1.14-1.62
MedX Health Console Model 1100-placebo-6.10-9.89-0.03-2.00

Mean Difference in Change in Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) Score at Baseline and 6 Weeks.

The primary outcome is mean difference on composite scores of Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) between entry into the study and completion of treatment (visit 18, week 6) for both the LED group and the placebo group. The mean difference is calculated by taking the mean of differences of the entry scores minus the 6 week scores. There are 5 composite scores on the ImPACT test; verbal memory, visual memory, visual motor speed, reaction time, and symptom score. The ranges for these subscales are as follows: verbal memory and visual memory: 0-100, visual motor speed: 0-60, reaction time: 0-1.0, and symptom score: 0-132. A higher verbal memory, visual memory, and visual motor speed represent a better outcome, while a lower reaction time and lower symptom score represent a better outcome. (NCT02383472)
Timeframe: From baseline to 6 weeks

,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Verbal MemoryVisual MemoryVisual Motor SpeedReaction TimeSymptom Score
MedX Health Console Model 1100-0.93.52-2.04-0.00110.14
MedX Health Console Model 1100-placebo-5.78-7.26-5.150.03011.44

Mean Difference in Change in Total Cognitive Symptom Score at Weeks 3 and Weeks 6

"This measure indicates the mean difference in total cognitive symptom scores between entry into the study and 3 weeks and entry into the study and 6 weeks for both the LED group and the placebo group. The mean difference is calculated by taking the mean of differences of the entry scores minus the 3 week scores and the entry scores minus the 6 weeks scores. The total cognitive symptom scored is a sum of 7 symptom scores from the PCSS; feeling slowed down, feeling like in a fog, don't feel right, difficulty concentrating, difficulty remembering, fatigue or low energy, and confusion. The severity of these symptoms are scored 0-6, 0=none, 6=severe. The range for the total cognitive symptom score is 0-42, a lower score represents a better outcome." (NCT02383472)
Timeframe: From baseline to 3 weeks and from baseline to 6 weeks

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Cognitive Sx Score - 3 WeeksCognitive Sx Score - 6 Weeks
MedX Health Console Model 11003.954.00
MedX Health Console Model 1100-placebo1.315.00

Mean Difference in Change in Total Post Concussion Symptom Score (PCSS) at Weeks 3 and Weeks 6.

This measure indicates the mean differences in total post concussion symptom score (PCSS) between entry into the study and 3 weeks and entry into the study and 6 weeks for both the LED group and the placebo group. The mean difference is calculated by taking the mean of differences of the entry scores minus the 3 week scores and the entry scores minus the 6 week scores. The PCSS is a sum of severity scores from 0-6 (0=none, 6=severe) for 22 individual symptoms, like headache, neck pain, or drowsiness. The range for the PCSS is 0-132, a lower score represents a better outcome. (NCT02383472)
Timeframe: From baseline to 3 weeks and from baseline to 6 weeks

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
PCSS Total Score - 3 WeeksPCSS Total score - 6 Weeks
MedX Health Console Model 11009.417.86
MedX Health Console Model 1100-placebo7.0314.63

Change From Baseline in Movement Disorder's Society - Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) (Parts I-III Combined Scores)

"To evaluate clinical progression of PD as assessed by the MDS-UPDRS, combined score, Parts I, II, and III.~Part I - non-motor experiences of daily living; Part II - motor experiences of daily living; Part III - motor examination. Parts I and II each contain 13 questions measured on a 5-point scale (0-4). Part III contains 18 objective rater assessments of the motor signs of PD measured on a 5-point scale (0-4).~Total range for combined score (Part I-III) is = 0-176. Generally for MDS-UPDRS scores and sub-scores, the lower the score, the better.~Parts I, II, and III are summed to make the total score." (NCT02202551)
Timeframe: Up to 101 weeks. MDS-UPDRS was performed at the following visits: Screening, Week 8, Week 16, Week 28, Week 40, Week 52, Week 64, Week 76, Week 88, Week 100 (or ET).

,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline at Week 8Change from Baseline at Week 16Change from Baseline at Week 28Change from Baseline at Week 40Change from Baseline at Week 52Change from Baseline at Week 64Change from Baseline at Week 76Change from Baseline at Week 88Change from Baseline at Week 100
ADS-5102 1A41.81.21.64.87.513.28.811.711.311.4
ADS-5102 Group 1P45.6-2.8-1.41.5-0.42.62.67.33.73.7
ADS-5102 Group 252.80.85.76.51.66.16.19.46.46.5
ADS-5102 Group 352.4-5.3-5.2-5.3-4.8-4.6-4.6-4.90.94.1

Change From Baseline in Movement Disorder's Society - Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale MDS-UPDRS (Part IV - Motor Complications)

"This component (Questions 4.1 - 4.6) includes time spent with dyskinesia, functional impact of dyskinesia, time spent in OFF state, functional impact of fluctuations, complexity of motor fluctuations, painful OFF-state dystonia. Questions 4.1-4.6 are summed to make the Part IV score.~Generally for MDS-UPDRS scores and sub-scores, the lower the score, the better. Total range for Part IV is = 0-24" (NCT02202551)
Timeframe: 100 Weeks. MDS-UPDRS was performed at the following visits: Screening, Week 8, Week 16, Week 28, Week 40, Week 52, Week 64, Week 76, Week 88, Week 100 (or ET).

,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange in Baseline from Week 8Change in Baseline from Week 16Change from Baseline at Week 28Change from Baseline at Week 40Change from Baseline at Week 52Change from Baseline at Week 64Change from Baseline at Week 76Change from Baseline at Week 88Change from Baseline at Week 100
Group 1a6.5-0.2-0.8-0.30.00.20.40.90.40.4
Group 1P9.6-3.4-3.2-3.3-2.8-2.9-3.3-2.9-2.8-2.4
Group 29.8-3.6-1.1-1.4-2.9-2.5-1.9-2.7-3.7-3.6
Group 310.4-4.0-3.9-4.4-4.7-3.6-2.5-3.7-4.3-3.6

Number of Participants With Reported AEs and Safety-Related Study Drug Discontinuations

The primary objective of the study was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of ADS-5102 oral capsules, an extended release (ER) formulation of amantadine, administered at a dose of 340 mg once daily at bedtime for the treatment of levodopa-induced dyskinesia (LID) in subjects with Parkinson's disease (PD). (NCT02202551)
Timeframe: Up to 101 weeks

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
AEStudy drug-related AESAEsPermanent discontinuation due to AEPermanent discontinuation due to drug-related AEMild AEsModerate AEsMild drug-related AEModerate drug-related AESevere drug-related AE
Group 1a573116124122516123
Group 1P7045212115133615237
Group 223166643133121
Group 355321710811265225

Reviews

2 reviews available for amantadine and Long Sleeper Syndrome

ArticleYear
Facilitation of functional independence after neurotrauma: strategies for increasing physiologic readiness.
    NeuroRehabilitation, 2014, Volume: 34, Issue:4

    Topics: Amantadine; Analgesia; Brain Injuries; Dehydration; Dietary Supplements; Dopamine Agents; Frontal Lo

2014
Medical therapies for concussion.
    Clinics in sports medicine, 2011, Volume: 30, Issue:1

    Topics: Amantadine; Analgesics, Non-Narcotic; Antiparkinson Agents; Athletic Injuries; Brain Concussion; Bra

2011

Trials

2 trials available for amantadine and Long Sleeper Syndrome

ArticleYear
Comparative toxicity of amantadine hydrochloride and rimantadine hydrochloride in healthy adults.
    Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 1981, Volume: 19, Issue:2

    Topics: Adamantane; Adult; Amantadine; Central Nervous System Diseases; Gastrointestinal Diseases; Humans; M

1981
The prophylactic effectiveness of amantadine hydrochloride in an epidemic of Hong Kong influenza in Leningrad in 1969.
    Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 1970, Volume: 42, Issue:6

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Amantadine; Disease Outbreaks; Humans; Influenza, Human; Male; Placebos; Sleep Wa

1970

Other Studies

6 other studies available for amantadine and Long Sleeper Syndrome

ArticleYear
Medical treatment of Parkinson disease.
    Neurologic clinics, 2009, Volume: 27, Issue:3

    Topics: Amantadine; Antiparkinson Agents; Catechol O-Methyltransferase Inhibitors; Cognition Disorders; Corp

2009
Features associated with the development of hallucinations in Parkinson's disease.
    Acta neurologica Scandinavica, 2006, Volume: 114, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Amantadine; Antiparkinson Agents; Brain; Cholinergic Antagonists; Do

2006
Mental side effects of amantadine therapy: its spectrum and characteristics in a normal population.
    The Journal of clinical psychiatry, 1981, Volume: 42, Issue:9

    Topics: Adult; Affect; Age Factors; Aged; Amantadine; Humans; Memory; Mental Processes; Middle Aged; Personn

1981
L-dopa for parkinsonism.
    Geriatrics, 1973, Volume: 28, Issue:1

    Topics: Aged; Amantadine; Depression; Dihydroxyphenylalanine; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hallucinations; Hum

1973
[Amantadine treatment in parkinsonism].
    Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening : tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke, 1973, Oct-10, Volume: 93, Issue:28

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Amantadine; Anxiety; Hallucinations; Humans; Parkinson Disease; Sleep Wake Dis

1973
[Results obtained with L-DOPA and amantadine in the treatment of patients with disorders of consciousness and of the vigilant state].
    L'Ateneo parmense. Acta bio-medica : organo della Societa di medicina e scienze naturali di Parma, 1973, Volume: 44, Issue:5

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Amantadine; Attention; Brain Diseases; Brain Injuries; Brain Neoplasms; Cognition Disor

1973