am-630 and Pain

Protocatechuic acid is an antioxidant which is shown to have analgesic activity in limited studies. However, the mechanisms of action remain unclear.. It is aimed to investigate the possible contribution of cannabinoid system that supresses the nociceptive process by the activation of CB1 and CB2 receptors in central and peripheral levels of pain pathways, to the analgesic activity of protocatechuic acid.. The analgesic activity of protocatechuic acid was determined at the doses of 75, 150 and 300 mg/kg (i.p.) by acetic acid-induced writhing and tail-immersion tests in mice. The results were compared to the analgesic effect of 300 mg/kg (i.p.) dipyrone and non-specific CB receptor agonist 5 mg/kg (i.p.) WIN 55,212-2. For investigating the contribution of cannabinoid system to protocatechuic acid analgesia; pre-treatment with 8 mg/kg (i.p.) CB1 antagonist AM251 and 8 mg/kg (i.p.) CB2 antagonist AM630 were performed separately before 300 mg/kg protocatechuic acid administration.. It was determined that protocatechuic acid has dose-dependent analgesic effect independently from locomotor activity and is comparable with effects of dipyrone and WIN 55,212-2. Pre-treatment with CB1 receptor antagonist AM251 significantly antagonized the protocatechuic acid-induced analgesia in the tail-immersion and writhing tests, whereas pre-treatment of CB2 receptor antagonist AM630 was found to be effective only in the tail-immersion test.. It is concluded that cannabinoid modulation contributes to the analgesic effect of protocatechuic acid in spinal level rather than peripheral. CB1 receptor stimulation rather than CB2 receptor stimulation mediates the analgesic effect of protocatechuic acid in both levels, especially peripheral. Graphical abstract Protocatechuic acid inhibits pain response via cannabinoidergic system.

Topics: Acetic Acid; Analgesics; Animals; Disease Models, Animal; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Hydroxybenzoates; Indoles; Male; Mice; Pain; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB1; Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB2; Receptors, Cannabinoid

Cannabinoids (CBs) play important roles in pain modulation. Recently, VD-hemopressin(β) [VD-Hpβ], a 12-residue β-hemoglobin-derived peptide, was reported to activate both CB

Topics: Acetic Acid; Analgesics; Animals; Area Under Curve; Disease Models, Animal; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Routes; Indoles; Male; Mice; Mice, Inbred Strains; Oligopeptides; Pain; Pain Measurement; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Rotarod Performance Test; Spinal Cord

Opioids do not effectively manage pain in many patients with advanced cancer. Because anandamide (AEA) activation of cannabinoid type-1 receptors (CB1R) on nociceptors reduces nociception, manipulation of AEA metabolism in the periphery may be an effective alternative or adjuvant therapy in the management of cancer pain. AEA is hydrolyzed by the intracellular enzyme fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH), and this enzyme activity contributes to uptake of AEA into neurons and to reduction of AEA available to activate CB1R. We used an in vitro preparation of adult murine dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons co-cultured with fibrosarcoma cells to investigate how tumors alter the uptake of AEA into neurons. Evidence that the uptake of [(3)H]AEA into dissociated DRG cells in the co-culture model mimicked the increase in uptake that occurred in DRG cells from tumor-bearing mice supported the utility of the in vitro model to study AEA uptake. Results with the fluorescent AEA analog CAY10455 confirmed that an increase in uptake in the co-culture model occurred in neurons. One factor that contributed to the increase in [(3)H]AEA uptake was an increase in total cellular cholesterol in the cancer condition. Treatment with the FAAH inhibitor URB597 reduced CAY10455 uptake in the co-culture model to the level observed in DRG neurons maintained in the control condition (i.e., in the absence of fibrosarcoma cells), and this effect was paralleled by OMDM-1, an inhibitor of AEA uptake, at a concentration that had no effect on FAAH activity. Maximally effective concentrations of the two drugs together produced a greater reduction than was observed with each drug alone. Treatment with BMS309403, which competes for AEA binding to fatty acid binding protein-5, mimicked the effect of OMDM-1 in vitro. Local injection of OMDM-1 reduced hyperalgesia in vivo in mice with unilateral tumors in and around the calcaneous bone. Intraplantar injection of OMDM-1 (5μg) into the tumor-bearing paw reduced mechanical hyperalgesia through a CB1R-dependent mechanism and also reduced a spontaneous nocifensive behavior. The same dose reduced withdrawal responses evoked by suprathreshold mechanical stimuli in naive mice. These data support the conclusion that OMDM-1 inhibits AEA uptake by a mechanism that is independent of inhibition of FAAH and provide a rationale for the development of peripherally restricted drugs that decrease AEA uptake for the management of cancer pain.

Topics: Animals; Arachidonic Acids; Benzamides; Brain Neoplasms; Cannabinoid Receptor Antagonists; Carbamates; Cells, Cultured; Coculture Techniques; Disease Models, Animal; Endocannabinoids; Enzyme Inhibitors; Fibrosarcoma; Fluorescent Dyes; Ganglia, Spinal; Hyperalgesia; Indoles; Lactones; Male; Mice; Mice, Inbred C3H; Pain; Pain Threshold; Polyunsaturated Alkamides; Sensory Receptor Cells; Statistics, Nonparametric; Tritium

It has been demonstrated that opioid and cannabinoid receptor systems can produce similar signal transduction and behavioural effects. Neuropeptide FF (NPFF) belongs to an opioid-modulating peptide family. NPFF has been reported to play important roles in control of pain and analgesia through interactions with the opioid system. We were interested in whether the central and peripheral antinociception of cannabinoids could be influenced by supraspinal NPFF system. The present study examined the effects of NPFF and related peptides on the antinociceptive activities induced by the non-selective cannabinoid receptors agonist WIN55,212-2, given by supraspinal and intraplantar routes. In mice, the central and peripheral antinociception of WIN55,212-2 are mediated by cannabinoid CB(1) and CB(2) receptors, respectively. Interestingly, central administration of NPFF significantly reduced central and peripheral analgesia of cannabinoids in dose-dependent manners. In contrast, dNPA and NPVF (i.c.v.), two highly selective agonists for NPFF(2) and NPFF(1) receptors, dose-dependently augmented the antinociception caused by intracerebroventricular and intraplantar injection of WIN55,212-2. Additionally, pretreatment with the NPFF receptors selective antagonist RF9 (i.c.v.) markedly reduced the cannabinoid-modulating activities of NPFF and related peptides in nociceptive assays. These data provide the first evidence for a functional interaction between NPFF and cannabinoid systems, indicating that activation of central NPFF receptors interferes with cannabinoid-mediated central and peripheral antinociception. Intriguingly, the present work may pave the way for a new strategy of using combination treatment of cannabinoid and NPFF agonists for pain management. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled 'Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder'.

Topics: Analgesia; Analgesics; Animals; Benzoxazines; Indoles; Male; Mice; Morpholines; Naloxone; Naphthalenes; Oligopeptides; Pain; Pain Measurement; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB1; Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB2

Spinal glial activation has been implicated in sustained morphine-mediated paradoxical pain sensitization. Since activation of glial CB2 cannabinoid receptors attenuates spinal glial activation in neuropathies, we hypothesized that CB2 agonists may also attenuate sustained morphine-mediated spinal glial activation and pain sensitization. Our data indicate that co-administration of a CB2-selective agonist (AM 1241) attenuates morphine (intraperitoneal; twice daily; 6 days)-mediated thermal hyperalgesia and tactile allodynia in rats. A CB2 (AM 630) but not a CB1 (AM 251) antagonist mitigated this effect. AM 1241 co-treatment also attenuated spinal astrocyte and microglial marker and pro-inflammatory mediator (IL-1β, TNFα) immunoreactivities in morphine-treated rats, suggesting that CB2 agonists may be useful to prevent the neuroinflammatory consequences of sustained morphine treatment.

Topics: Analgesics; Analgesics, Opioid; Animals; Cannabinoids; Hyperalgesia; Indoles; Inflammation; Interleukin-1beta; Male; Morphine; Neuroglia; Pain; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB2; Spinal Cord; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

Cannabinoid 2 receptor (CB2R) agonists attenuate inflammatory pain but the precise mechanism implicated in these effects is not completely elucidated. We investigated if the peripheral nitric oxide-cGMP-protein kinase G (PKG)-ATP-sensitive K(+) (KATP) channels signaling pathway triggered by the neuronal nitric oxide synthase (NOS1) and modulated by opioids, participates in the local antinociceptive effects produced by a CB2R agonist (JWH-015) during chronic inflammatory pain.. In wild type (WT) and NOS1 knockout (NOS1-KO) mice, at 10 days after the subplantar administration of complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA), we evaluated the antiallodynic (von Frey filaments) and antihyperalgesic (plantar test) effects produced by the subplantar administration of JWH-015 and the reversion of their effects by the local co-administration with CB2R (AM630), peripheral opioid receptor (naloxone methiodide, NX-ME) or CB1R (AM251) antagonists. Expression of CB2R and NOS1 as well as the antinociceptive effects produced by a high dose of JWH-015 combined with different doses of selective L-guanylate cyclase (ODQ) or PKG (Rp-8-pCPT-cGMPs) inhibitors or a KATP channel blocker (glibenclamide), were also assessed. Results show that the local administration of JWH-015 dose-dependently inhibited the mechanical and thermal hypersensitivity induced by CFA which effects were completely reversed by the local co-administration of AM630 or NX-ME, but not AM251. Inflammatory pain increased the paw expression of CB2R and the dorsal root ganglia transcription of NOS1. Moreover, the antinociceptive effects of JWH-015 were absent in NOS1-KO mice and diminished by their co-administration with ODQ, Rp-8-pCPT-cGMPs or glibenclamide.. These data indicate that the peripheral antinociceptive effects of JWH-015 during chronic inflammatory pain are mainly produced by the local activation of the nitric oxide-cGMP-PKG-KATP signaling pathway, triggered by NOS1 and mediated by endogenous opioids. These findings suggest that the activation of this pathway might be an interesting therapeutic target for the treatment of chronic inflammatory pain with cannabinoids.

Topics: Analgesics; Analgesics, Opioid; Animals; Cannabinoid Receptor Agonists; Cannabinoid Receptor Antagonists; Cyclic GMP; Glyburide; Indoles; KATP Channels; Mice; Mice, Knockout; Naloxone; Nitric Oxide; Nitric Oxide Synthase Type I; Pain; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Quaternary Ammonium Compounds; Receptors, Cannabinoid; Signal Transduction; Thionucleotides

Peripheral cannabinoid receptors exert a powerful inhibitory control over pain initiation, but the endocannabinoid signal that normally engages this intrinsic analgesic mechanism is unknown. To address this question, we developed a peripherally restricted inhibitor (URB937) of fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH), the enzyme responsible for the degradation of the endocannabinoid anandamide. URB937 suppressed FAAH activity and increased anandamide levels outside the rodent CNS. Despite its inability to access brain and spinal cord, URB937 attenuated behavioral responses indicative of persistent pain in rodent models of peripheral nerve injury and inflammation and prevented noxious stimulus-evoked neuronal activation in spinal cord regions implicated in nociceptive processing. CB₁ cannabinoid receptor blockade prevented these effects. These results suggest that anandamide-mediated signaling at peripheral CB₁ receptors controls the access of pain-related inputs to the CNS. Brain-impenetrant FAAH inhibitors, which strengthen this gating mechanism, might offer a new approach to pain therapy.

Topics: Amidohydrolases; Animals; Arachidonic Acids; Cannabinoid Receptor Modulators; Cannabinoids; Carrageenan; Chromatography, Liquid; Disease Models, Animal; Drug Administration Routes; Drug Administration Schedule; Endocannabinoids; Enzyme Inhibitors; Escape Reaction; Ethylene Glycols; Feeding Behavior; Formaldehyde; Gene Expression Regulation; Hyperalgesia; Indoles; Male; Mass Spectrometry; Mice; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Mice, Knockout; Monoacylglycerol Lipases; Motor Activity; Oncogene Proteins v-fos; Pain; Pain Measurement; Pain Threshold; Peripheral Nervous System Diseases; Piperidines; Polyunsaturated Alkamides; PPAR alpha; Pyrazoles; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Rimonabant; Sciatica; Spinal Cord; Statistics, Nonparametric; Time Factors; Tissue Distribution; Tritium

Acupuncture is widely used clinically to treat acute and chronic pain conditions, but the mechanisms underlying its effect are not fully understood. Although endocannabinoids are involved in modulation of nociception in animal models and in humans, their role in acupuncture analgesia has not been assessed. In this report, we determined the effect of electroacupuncture (EA) on the level of anandamide in the skin tissue and the role of cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 receptors in the analgesic effect of EA in an animal model of inflammatory pain. Inflammatory pain was induced by local injection of complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA) into the hind paw of rats. Thermal hyperalgesia was tested with a radiant heat stimulus, and mechanical allodynia was quantified with von Frey filaments. The anandamide concentration in the skin tissue was measured by using high-performance liquid chromatography. EA, applied to GB30 and GB34, at 2 and 100Hz significantly reduced thermal hyperalgesia and mechanical allodynia induced by CFA injection. Compared with the sham group, EA significantly increased the anandamide level in the inflamed skin tissue. Local pretreatment with a specific CB2 receptor antagonist, AM630, significantly attenuated the antinociceptive effect of EA. However, the effect of EA was not significantly altered by AM251, a selective CB1 receptor antagonist. These findings suggest that EA potentiates the local release of endogenous anandamide from inflamed tissues. Activation of peripheral CB2 receptors contributes to the analgesic effect of EA on inflammatory pain.. This study shows that electroacupuncture increases the anandamide level in inflammatory skin tissues, and CB2 receptors contribute to the analgesic effect of electroacupuncture in a rat model of inflammatory pain. This information improves our understanding of the mechanisms involved in the analgesic effect of acupuncture.

Topics: Animals; Arachidonic Acids; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Electroacupuncture; Endocannabinoids; Freund's Adjuvant; Hindlimb; Hot Temperature; Hyperalgesia; Indoles; Male; Pain; Pain Management; Physical Stimulation; Piperidines; Polyunsaturated Alkamides; Pyrazoles; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB1; Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB2; Skin

Although participation of opioids in antinociception induced by cannabinoids has been documented, there is little information regarding the participation of cannabinoids in the antinociceptive mechanisms of opioids. The aim of the present study was to determine whether endocannabinoids could be involved in peripheral antinociception induced by activation of mu-, delta- and kappa-opioid receptors.. Nociceptive thresholds to mechanical stimulation of rat paws treated with intraplantar prostaglandin E2 (PGE2, 2 microg) to induce hyperalgesia were measured 3 h after injection using an algesimetric apparatus. Opioid agonists morphine (200 microg), (+)-4-[(alphaR)-alpha-((2S,5R)-4-Allyl-2,5-dimethyl-1-piperazinyl)-3-methoxybenzyl]-N,N-diethylbenzamide (SNC80) (80 microg), bremazocine (50 microg); cannabinoid receptor antagonists N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-iodophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide (AM251) (20-80 microg), 6-iodo-2-methyl-1-[2-(4-morpholinyl)ethyl]-1H-indol-3-yl(4-methoxyphenyl) methanone (AM630) (12.5-100 microg); and an inhibitor of methyl arachidonyl fluorophosphonate (MAFP) (1-4 microg) were also injected in the paw.. The CB1-selective cannabinoid receptor antagonist AM251 completely reversed the peripheral antinociception induced by morphine in a dose-dependent manner. In contrast, the CB2-selective cannabinoid receptor antagonist AM630 elicited partial antagonism of this effect. In addition, the administration of the fatty acid amide hydrolase inhibitor, MAFP, enhanced the antinociception induced by morphine. The cannabinoid receptor antagonists AM251 and AM630 did not modify the antinociceptive effect of SNC80 or bremazocine. The antagonists alone did not cause any hyperalgesic or antinociceptive effect.. Our results provide evidence for the involvement of endocannabinoids, in the peripheral antinociception induced by the mu-opioid receptor agonist morphine. The release of cannabinoids appears not to be involved in the peripheral antinociceptive effect induced by kappa- and delta-opioid receptor agonists.

Topics: Amidohydrolases; Analgesics, Opioid; Animals; Arachidonic Acids; Benzamides; Benzomorphans; Cannabinoid Receptor Modulators; Dinoprostone; Disease Models, Animal; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Enzyme Inhibitors; Hyperalgesia; Indoles; Male; Morphine; Organophosphonates; Pain; Pain Measurement; Piperazines; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB1; Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB2; Receptors, Opioid, delta; Receptors, Opioid, kappa; Receptors, Opioid, mu

Selective CB2 receptor agonists are promising potential therapeutic agents for the treatment of inflammatory and neuropathic pain. A focused screen identified a pyrimidine ester as a partial agonist at the CB2 receptor with micromolar potency. Subsequent lead optimization identified 35, GW842166X, as the optimal compound in the series. 35 has an oral ED50 of 0.1 mg/kg in the rat FCA model of inflammatory pain and was selected as a clinical candidate for this indication.

Topics: Analgesics; Animals; Biological Availability; Half-Life; Humans; Inflammation; Pain; Pyrans; Pyrimidines; Rats; Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB2; Structure-Activity Relationship

Cannabinoids, such as anandamide, are involved in pain transmission. We evaluated the effects of AM404 (N-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-5Z,8Z,11Z,14Z-eicosatetraenamide), an anandamide reuptake inhibitor, monitoring the expression of c-fos, a marker of activated neurons and the pain-related behaviours using formalin test. The study was carried out in an experimental model of inflammatory pain made by a single injection of formalin in rat hind paws. Formalin test showed that the antinociceptive effect of AM404 was evident in phase I. We found that Fos-positive neurons in dorsal superficial and deep laminae of the lumbar spinal cord increased in formalin-injected animals and that AM404 significantly reduced Fos induction. Co-administration of cannabinoid CB(1) receptor antagonist (AM251), cannabinoid CB(2) receptor antagonist (AM630) and transient receptor potential vanilloid type 1 (TRPV-1) antagonist (capsazepine), attenuate the inhibitory effect of AM404 and this effect was higher using cannabinoid CB(2) and vanilloid TRPV-1 receptor antagonists. These results suggest that AM404 could be a useful drug to reduce inflammatory pain in our experimental model and that cannabinoid CB(2) receptor and vanilloid TRPV-1 receptor, and to a lesser extent, the cannabinoid CB(1) receptor are involved.

Topics: Animals; Arachidonic Acids; Capsaicin; Endocannabinoids; Immunohistochemistry; Indoles; Inflammation; Male; Pain; Pain Measurement; Piperidines; Polyunsaturated Alkamides; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-fos; Pyrazoles; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB1; Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB2; Spinal Cord; TRPV Cation Channels

The antinociceptive effects of WIN55,212-2, a synthetic cannabinoid, were evaluated in the model of partial sciatic nerve ligation after daily subcutaneous administration of 0.1 mg/kg a week before and two weeks after surgery. Mechanical allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia were evaluated in 46 rats allocated to receive: (1) Vehicle (before surgery)-Vehicle (after surgery); (2) Vehicle-WIN55,212-2; (3) WIN55,212-2-Vehicle; (4) WIN55,212-2-WIN55,212-2; (5) AM251+vehicle; (6) AM251+WIN55,212-2; (7) AM630+vehicle; (8) AM630+WIN55,212-2; (9) Sham receiving vehicle; and (10) Sham receiving WIN55,212-2. The decreased in mechanical allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia by WIN55,212-2 was significantly greater when it was administered during one week before surgery. In conclusion, pre-emptive use of cannabinoids produced greater antinociceptive effects in a model of neuropathic pain and this effect is mediated by cannabinoid CB(1) and CB(2) receptors.

Topics: Analgesics; Animals; Benzoxazines; Cannabinoids; Hyperalgesia; Indoles; Male; Morpholines; Naphthalenes; Pain; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB1; Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB2; Sciatic Nerve; Sciatic Neuropathy

Anandamide, an endocannabinoid, is degraded by the enzyme fatty acid amide hydrolase which can be inhibited by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). The present work was designed to study the peripheral interactions between anandamide and ibuprofen (a non-specific cyclooxygenase inhibitor) in the rat formalin test. We first determined the ED50 for anandamide (0.018 microg +/- 0.009), ibuprofen (0.18 microg +/- 0.09), and their combination (0.006 microg +/- 0.002). Drugs were given 15 min before a 2.5% formalin injection into the dorsal surface of the right hind paw. Results were analyzed using isobolographic analysis. The antinociceptive interaction between anandamide and ibuprofen was synergistic. To further investigate the mechanisms by which the combination of anandamide with ibuprofen produced their antinociceptive effects, we used specific antagonists for the cannabinoid CB1 (AM251; 80 microg) and CB2 (AM630; 25 microg) receptors. We demonstrated that the antinociceptive effects of ibuprofen were not antagonized by either AM251 or AM630 and that those of anandamide were antagonized by AM251 but not by AM630. The synergistic antinociceptive effects of the combination of anandamide with ibuprofen were completely antagonized by AM251 but only partially inhibited by AM630. In conclusion, locally (hind paw) injected anandamide, ibuprofen or combination thereof decreased pain behavior in the formalin test. The combination of anandamide with ibuprofen produced synergistic antinociceptive effects involving both cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 receptors. Comprehension of the mechanisms involved needs further investigation.

Topics: Acute Disease; Analysis of Variance; Animals; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Arachidonic Acids; Area Under Curve; Cannabinoid Receptor Modulators; Disease Models, Animal; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Combinations; Drug Interactions; Endocannabinoids; Ibuprofen; Indoles; Inflammation; Male; Pain; Pain Measurement; Piperidines; Polyunsaturated Alkamides; Pyrazoles; Random Allocation; Rats

Accumulating evidence suggests that cannabinoids can produce antinociception through peripheral mechanisms. In the present study, we determined whether cannabinoids attenuated existing hyperalgesia produced by a mild heat injury to the glabrous hindpaw and whether the antihyperalgesia was receptor-mediated. Anesthetized rats received a mild heat injury (55 degrees C for 30 s) to one hindpaw. Fifteen minutes after injury, animals exhibited hyperalgesia as evidenced by lowered withdrawal latency to radiant heat and increased withdrawal frequency to a von Frey monofilament (200 mN force) delivered to the injured hindpaw. Separate groups of animals were then treated with an intraplantar (i.pl.) injection of vehicle or the cannabinoid receptor agonist WIN 55,212-2 at doses of 1, 10, or 30 microg in 100 microl. WIN 55,212-2 attenuated both heat and mechanical hyperalgesia dose-dependently. The inactive enantiomer WIN 55,212-3 did not alter mechanical or heat hyperalgesia, suggesting the effects of WIN 55,212-2 were receptor-mediated. The CB1 receptor antagonist AM 251 (30 microg) co-injected with WIN 55,212-2 (30 microg) attenuated the antihyperalgesic effects of WIN 55,212-2. The CB2 receptor antagonist AM 630 (30 microg) co-injected with WIN 55,212-2 attenuated only the early antihyperalgesic effects of WIN 55,212-2. I.pl. injection of WIN 55,212-2 into the contralateral paw did not alter the heat-injury induced hyperalgesia, suggesting that the antihyperalgesia occurred through a peripheral mechanism. These data demonstrate that cannabinoids primarily activate peripheral CB1 receptors to attenuate hyperalgesia. Activation of this receptor in the periphery may attenuate pain without causing unwanted side effects mediated by central CB1 receptors.

Topics: Animals; Benzoxazines; Burns; Cannabinoid Receptor Agonists; Cannabinoid Receptor Antagonists; Disease Models, Animal; Hot Temperature; Hyperalgesia; Indoles; Male; Morpholines; Naphthalenes; Nerve Fibers, Myelinated; Nerve Fibers, Unmyelinated; Nociceptors; Pain; Pain Measurement; Physical Stimulation; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB1; Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB2; Receptors, Cannabinoid; Reflex; Skin