alogliptin and Weight-Gain

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors offer new options for the management of type 2 diabetes. Direct comparisons with active glucose-lowering comparators in drug-naive patients have demonstrated that DPP-4 inhibitors exert slightly less pronounced HbA(1c) reduction than metformin (with the advantage of better gastrointestinal tolerability) and similar glucose-lowering effects as with a thiazolidinedione (TZD; with the advantage of no weight gain). In metformin-treated patients, gliptins were associated with similar HbA(1c) reductions compared with a sulphonylurea (SU; with the advantage of no weight gain, considerably fewer hypoglycaemic episodes and no need for titration) and a TZD (with the advantage of no weight gain and better overall tolerability). DPP-4 inhibitors also exert clinically relevant glucose-lowering effects compared with a placebo in patients treated with SU or TZD (of potential interest when metformin is either not tolerated or contraindicated), and as oral triple therapy with a good tolerability profile when added to a metformin-SU or pioglitazone-SU combination. Several clinical trials also showed a consistent reduction in HbA(1c) when DPP-4 inhibitors were added to basal insulin therapy, with no increased risk of hypoglycaemia. Because of the complex pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes and the complementary actions of glucose-lowering agents, initial combination of a DPP-4 inhibitor with either metformin or a glitazone may be applied in drug-naive patients, resulting in greater efficacy and similar safety compared with either drug as monotherapy. However, DPP-4 inhibitors were less effective than GLP-1 receptor agonists for reducing HbA(1c) and body weight, but offer the advantage of being easier to use (oral instead of injected administration) and lower in cost. Only one head-to-head trial demonstrated the non-inferiority of saxagliptin vs sitagliptin. Clearly, more trials of direct comparisons between different incretin-based therapies are needed. Because of their pharmacokinetic characteristics, pharmacodynamic properties (glucose-dependent glucose-lowering effect) and good overall tolerability profile, DPP-4 inhibitors may have a key role to play in patients with renal impairment and in the elderly. The role of DPP-4 inhibitors in the therapeutic armamentarium of type 2 diabetes is rapidly evolving as their potential strengths and weaknesses become better defined mainly through controlled clinical trials.

Topics: Adamantane; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Linagliptin; Male; Metformin; Nitriles; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazines; Pyrrolidines; Quinazolines; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Triazoles; Uracil; Vildagliptin; Weight Gain

This was a post hoc analysis of a 2-year, double-blind study of 2639 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) inadequately controlled on metformin monotherapy, which assessed achievement of a composite endpoint of sustained glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) reduction (≤7.0% at week 104 or ≥0.5% decrease from baseline) with no weight gain and no hypoglycaemic events with alogliptin 12.5 and 25 mg daily or glipizide (≤20 mg daily), each added to metformin. With an HbA1c target of ≤7.0%, 24.2 and 26.9% of patients treated with alogliptin 12.5 and 25 mg, respectively, achieved the composite endpoint versus 10.7% of patients treated with glipizide (both p < 0.001). With a criterion of ≥0.5% decrease in HbA1c, the composite endpoint was reached in 22.5, 25.2 and 10.4% of patients treated with alogliptin 12.5 mg, alogliptin 25 mg and glipizide, respectively. Odds ratios for achieving the composite endpoint favoured alogliptin in the primary analysis set and in all subgroups of patients. Patients with T2DM failing metformin monotherapy were more likely to achieve sustained glycaemic control with no hypoglycaemia or weight gain at 2 years with alogliptin than with glipizide.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Endpoint Determination; Female; Glipizide; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Treatment Outcome; Uracil; Weight Gain; Young Adult

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of alogliptin added to insulin in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who are poorly controlled with insulin and diet or exercise.. This was a randomized, double-blind, 12-week comparative trial of alogliptin and insulin versus placebo and insulin in 179 patients with T2DM followed by a 40-week, open-label phase in 169 patients on alogliptin and insulin.. Change in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline to the end of double-blind phase (week 12).. The change in HbA1c (least squares means) from baseline to week 12 was -0.96% for the alogliptin and insulin group and -0.29% for the placebo and insulin group. The point estimate (95% confidence interval) intergroup difference was -0.66% ([-0.824%, -0.503%]). In the alogliptin and insulin group, HbA1c started to decrease from week 2 onward and peaked by week 12. The proportions of patients who achieved HbA1c < 8.0, < 7.0 and < 6.0% at week 12 were significantly higher in alogliptin and insulin group (73.0, 23.3 and 1.1%) than in placebo and insulin group (25.0, 5.7 and 0%). Incidences of adverse effects were comparable between groups, with no relevant increases in hypoglycemia or weight gain seen.. Alogliptin 25 mg/day was effective and well tolerated when added to insulin in Japanese patients with inadequately controlled T2DM.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Placebo Effect; Uracil; Weight Gain

To prospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of alogliptin versus glipizide in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) over 1 year of treatment.. This was a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled study of elderly T2DM patients (aged 65-90 years) with mild hyperglycaemia on diet/exercise therapy alone [glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) 6.5-9.0%] or plus oral antidiabetic monotherapy (HbA1c 6.5-8.0%). Patients were randomized to once-daily alogliptin 25 mg or glipizide 5 mg titrated to 10 mg, if needed. Hypoglycaemic episodes were systematically captured under predefined criteria.. In the primary analysis, HbA1c mean changes from a baseline of 7.5% were -0.14% with alogliptin (n = 222) and -0.09% with glipizide (n = 219) at the end of the study, demonstrating non-inferiority of alogliptin to glipizide [least squares (LS) mean difference = -0.05%; one-sided 97.5% confidence interval (CI): -∞, 0.13%]. More clinically relevant HbA1c reductions occurred among patients who completed the study: -0.42 and -0.33% with alogliptin and glipizide, with non-inferiority again confirmed (LS mean difference = -0.09%; one-sided 97.5% CI: -∞, 0.07%). Overall, alogliptin was safe and well tolerated, with notably fewer hypoglycaemic episodes than glipizide [5.4% (31 episodes) vs. 26.0% (232 episodes), respectively]; three patients experienced severe hypoglycaemia, all with glipizide. Alogliptin also resulted in favourable weight changes versus glipizide (-0.62 vs. 0.60 kg at week 52; p < 0.001).. Alogliptin monotherapy maintained glycaemic control comparable to that of glipizide in elderly patients with T2DM over 1 year of treatment, with substantially lower risk of hypoglycaemia and without weight gain.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Dizziness; Double-Blind Method; Female; Glipizide; Glycated Hemoglobin; Headache; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Male; Metformin; Piperidines; Prospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; Triglycerides; Uracil; Weight Gain

Acarbose was administered at 300 mg/day to patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who had been taking 25 mg/day of alogliptin, and levels of blood glucose were analyzed by continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) for 3 days. The mean blood glucose level with acarbose (136.4 ± 30.7 mg/dL) did not differ significantly from that without acarbose (141.7 ± 28.3 mg/dL). However, in the condition of the combination therapy, there were significant decreases in the standard deviation of the mean blood glucose levels for the 24-hour period (27.6 ± 9.1 vs. 16.2 ± 6.9 mg/dL, p<0.001) and mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE) (65.8 ± 26.1 vs. 38.8 ± 19.2 mg/dL, p=0.010). In addition, a meal tolerance test was conducted to monitor changes in insulin secretion and active GLP-1 and total GIP values. Ten subjects (5 males, 5 females) of 54.9 ± 6.9 years with BMI 25.9 ± 5.2 kg/m² and HbAlc 9.2 ± 1.2% were enrolled. In the meal tolerance test, active GLP-1 values before and after acarbose administration were 17.0 ± 5.8 and 24.1 ± 9.3 pmol·hr/mL (p=0.054), respectively, showing an increasing tendency, and total GIP(AUC0-180) values were 685.9 ± 209.7 and 404.4 ± 173.7 pmol·hr/mL, respectively, showing a significant decrease (p=0.010). The results indicate that the combined administration of both inhibitors is effective not only in decreasing blood glucose fluctuations and preventing postprandial insulin secretion. The beneficial effects may also protect the endocrine pancreas and inhibit body weight gain.

Topics: Acarbose; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Drug Therapy, Combination; Enzyme Inhibitors; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glycated Hemoglobin; Glycoside Hydrolase Inhibitors; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Insulin; Insulin Secretion; Islets of Langerhans; Male; Middle Aged; Overweight; Piperidines; Uracil; Weight Gain

To assess the efficacy and safety of alogliptin added to insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with insulin alone or combined with metformin.. In this 26-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 390 patients were randomized to receive alogliptin 12.5 mg (n = 131), alogliptin 25 mg (n = 129) or placebo (n = 130) once daily, as add-on to stable insulin therapy with or without metformin. The primary endpoint was change in haemoglobin A(1C) (HbA(1C)) at week 26.. At week 26, mean HbA(1C) changes from the mean baseline value of 9.3% were significantly greater for alogliptin 12.5 mg (-0.63 +/- 0.08%) and alogliptin 25 mg (-0.71 +/- 0.08%) than placebo (-0.13 +/- 0.08%; p < 0.001). Significantly greater proportions of patients receiving alogliptin 12.5 or 25 mg than placebo had HbA(1C) decreases of > or =0.5, > or =1.0 and > or =1.5%. Insulin doses remained unchanged, and there were no differences in the proportions of patients experiencing hypoglycaemia among placebo (24%), alogliptin 12.5 mg (27%) and alogliptin 25 mg (27%). Mean weight increases from baseline at week 26 were similar for placebo (0.6 +/- 0.2 kg), alogliptin 12.5 mg (0.7 +/- 0.2 kg) and alogliptin 25 mg (0.6 +/- 0.2 kg). Incidences of overall adverse events, and of gastrointestinal, dermatological and infection-related events, were similar among groups.. Adding alogliptin to previous insulin therapy (with or without metformin) significantly improved glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on insulin, without causing weight gain or increasing the incidence of hypoglycaemia. Further studies are warranted to explore the role of alogliptin added to optimized basal insulin regimens.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Treatment Outcome; Uracil; Weight Gain; Young Adult

Patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) may experience frequent body weight changes over time. The prognostic impact of these weight changes (gains or losses) requires further study.. To study the associations between changes in body weight (intentional or unintentional) with subsequent outcomes.. The EXAMINE trial included 5380 patients with T2D and a recent acute coronary syndrome, who were randomized to alogliptin or placebo. Time-updated Cox models and mixed effects models were used to test the associations between changes in body weight and subsequent outcomes over a median follow-up of 1.6 (1.0-2.1) years.. During the post-randomization follow-up period, 1044 patients (19.4%) experienced a weight loss ≥ 5% of baseline weight, 2677 (49.8%) had a stable weight, and 1659 (30.8%) had a ≥ 5 % weight gain. Patients with weight loss were more frequently women and had more co-morbid conditions. In contrast, patients who gained ≥ 5% weight were more frequently men with less co-morbid conditions. A weight loss ≥ 5% was independently associated with a higher risk of subsequent adverse outcomes, including all-cause mortality: adjusted HR (95% CI) = 1.79 (1.33-2.42), P < 0.001. Similar associations were found for cardiovascular mortality, the composite of cardiovascular mortality or heart failure hospitalization, and the primary outcome. A weight gain ≥ 5% was independently associated with an increase in the risk of subsequent cardiovascular mortality or heart failure hospitalization only: adjusted HR (95% CI) = 1.34 (1.02-1.76), P = 0.033.. In patients with T2D who had a recent ACS/MI, a ≥ 5% loss of body weight was associated with a higher risk of subsequent cardiovascular events and mortality.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Body Mass Index; Comorbidity; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Uracil; Weight Gain; Weight Loss

We sought to determine the effect of dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP-IV) inhibition on streptozotocin diabetes-induced vascular and neural dysfunction. After 4 weeks of untreated diabetes, rats were treated for 12 weeks with Alogliptin (DPP-IV inhibitor). Diabetes caused a slowing of motor and sensory nerve conduction velocity, thermal hypoalgesia, reduction in intraepidermal nerve fiber density in the hindpaw, and impairment in vascular relaxation to acetylcholine and calcitonin gene-related peptide in epineurial arterioles. Treatment significantly improved motor nerve conduction velocity and thermal response latency. Sensory nerve conduction velocity was marginally improved with treatment of diabetic rats, and treatment did not improve the decrease in intraepidermal nerve fiber density. Vascular relaxation by epineurial arterioles to calcitonin gene-related peptide but not acetylcholine was significantly improved with treatment. These studies suggest that some but not all vascular and neural complications associated with type 1 diabetes can be improved with the inhibition of DPP-IV activity.

Topics: Animals; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Experimental; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetic Angiopathies; Diabetic Neuropathies; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Hypoglycemic Agents; Male; Motor Neurons; Neural Conduction; Oxidative Stress; Pain Measurement; Pain Threshold; Piperidines; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Sensory Receptor Cells; Time Factors; Uracil; Vasodilation; Weight Gain