alogliptin and Hypoglycemia

Topics: Benzoates; Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Drug Therapy, Combination; Half-Life; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Piperidines; Uracil

This article reviews evidence supporting sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor combination therapy for management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).. We conducted a nonsystematic review of the literature focusing on single-pill or fixed-dose combinations of SGLT2 inhibitors and DPP-4 inhibitors available in the United States.. SGLT2 inhibitors and DPP-4 inhibitors have complementary mechanisms of action that address several of the underlying pathophysiologic abnormalities present in T2DM without overlapping toxicities. The combination of these 2 agents has several advantages including a low risk of hypoglycemia, the potential for weight loss, the ability to coformulate into a pill with once-daily administration, and the possibility to use with other classes of glucose-lowering agents. Cardiovascular outcomes trials reported to date support the safety of the DPP-4 class and suggest possible cardioprotective effects for SGLT2 inhibitors - at least based on the first reported study that used empagliflozin. Recent clinical evidence shows that SGLT2 inhibitor/DPP-4 inhibitor therapy is an effective combination for T2DM treatment, providing glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) reductions of 1.1 to 1.5%, and weight reductions of approximately 2 kg when added to metformin, which is its primary place in therapy.. The combination of an SGLT2 inhibitor/DPP-4 inhibitor is a safe and effective treatment choice for patients with T2DM who are unable to obtain adequate glycemic control with metformin therapy, cannot use metformin, or have a higher baseline HbA1c.. BP = blood pressure; CI = confidence interval; CVOT = cardiovascular outcomes; DKA = diabetic ketoacidosis; DPP-4 = dipeptidyl peptidase-4; EXAMINE = EXamination of cArdiovascular outcoMes with alogliptiN versus standard of carE in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and acute coronary syndrome; FDA = Food and Drug Administration; HbA1c = glycated hemoglobin; HR = hazard ratio; MACE = major adverse cardiovascular events; SAVOR-TIMI 53 = Saxagliptin Assessment of Vascular Outcomes Recorded in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus; SBP = systolic blood pressure; SGLT2 = sodium glucose cotransporter 2; TECOS = Trial to Evaluate Cardiovascular Outcomes after Treatment with Sitagliptin; T2DM = type 2 diabetes mellitus; XR = extended release.

Topics: Adamantane; Benzhydryl Compounds; Blood Glucose; Canagliflozin; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glucosides; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Linagliptin; Metformin; Piperidines; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Treatment Outcome; Uracil

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors such as alogliptin are becoming more widely established as treatment options for patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) because of their ability to improve glycemic control without increasing the risk of hypoglycemia or weight gain. New therapies with improved safety profiles are needed, especially because of the chronic and progressive nature of T2DM.. In this article, the overall safety and tolerability of alogliptin are evaluated based upon a review of the literature. In particular, adverse events (AEs) that have been of interest for the DPP-4 class of drugs, such as the risk of major cardiovascular (CV) events and acute pancreatitis, will be investigated in detail.. Alogliptin is generally well-tolerated in a broad range of patient populations including different ethnic groups and the elderly. In the pivotal EXAMINE clinical trial, alogliptin was found not to be associated with an increased risk of major CV events or acute pancreatitis/pancreatic cancer.

Topics: Aged; Animals; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Piperidines; Uracil

As type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) progresses, most patients will require insulin replacement therapy. Whether oral antidiabetic drug (OAD) therapy should be retained when initiating insulin is still debated. While the rationale to keep metformin with insulin is strong (mostly as an insulin-sparing agent to limit weight gain), the evidence is less clear for other OADs. In particular, the question now comes up what the expected benefit could be of combining the newer agents, such as the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors with insulin. Additionally, when metformin is no longer a treatment option, as in the case of patients with severe renal impairment, insulin is often used as monotherapy, with little evidence of benefit in maintaining other OADs. In this specific situation, it is also of interest to evaluate the potential benefit of combined treatment with a DPP-4 inhibitor and insulin. Among the classic limitations of insulin therapy in patients with T2DM, hypoglycemia remains a major barrier to glycemic control, along with weight gain exacerbation. The oral DPP-4 inhibitors improve glycemic control by increasing the sensitivity of the islet cells to glucose, and thus are not associated with an increased risk for hypoglycemia and are weight neutral. In addition to the expected benefits associated with limiting insulin dose and regimen complexity, the specific advantages the DPP-4 inhibitor drug class on hypoglycemia and weight gain could justify combining DPP-4 inhibitors with insulin; additionally, a DPP-4 inhibitor may be of special value to decrease glycemic excursions that are not properly addressed by basal insulin therapy and metformin use, even after optimizing titration of the basal insulin. However, given the common original perception that treatment with DPP-4 inhibitors may be less beneficial with increasing disease progression because of the loss of β-cell function, the potential relevance of these agents in the setting of advanced T2DM treated with insulin was not necessarily anticipated. Promising data from studies on the use of these new agents in insulin-treated patients with T2DM have started to emerge. Our article provides a comprehensive overview of the currently available evidence from controlled randomized clinical trials and we discuss the potential role of DPP-4 inhibitors in the this setting. Further clinical experience will allow to fully assess the positioning of these agents in insulin-treated T2DM populations.

Topics: Adamantane; Body Weight; Diabetes Complications; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Disease Progression; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Linagliptin; Nitriles; Piperidines; Purines; Pyrazines; Pyrrolidines; Quinazolines; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Triazoles; Uracil; Vildagliptin

This open-label, parallel-group, exploratory study examined the effects of two dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) inhibitors on glycemic variability (GV) in patients with type 2 diabetes.. Randomized patients with glycated hemoglobin A1c of at least 6.5% to less than 8.5% received trelagliptin 100 mg (n = 13) once weekly or alogliptin 25 mg (n = 14) once daily for 29 days. Continuous glucose monitoring was performed before the start of the treatment period (baseline) and from day 21 to 29, inclusive. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in the standard deviation (SD) of 24-h blood glucose values, measured daily for 7 days (day 22-28) of the treatment period. Secondary and additional efficacy endpoints included changes in glycemic parameters and the rate of DPP4 inhibition, respectively. Adverse events (AEs) were monitored to assess safety.. Mean change from baseline in the SD of 24-h blood glucose (95% confidence interval) at day 28 was - 7.35 (- 15.13, 0.44) for trelagliptin and - 11.63 (- 18.67, - 4.59) for alogliptin. In both treatment groups, glycemic parameters improved and the rate of DPP4 inhibition was maintained. Three patients reported AEs; no severe treatment-emergent AEs were reported in either group.. Once-weekly trelagliptin and once-daily alogliptin improved glycemic control and reduced GV without inducing hypoglycemia.. ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02771093) and JAPIC (JapicCTI-163250).. Takeda Pharmaceutical Company, Ltd.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Pilot Projects; Piperidines; Uracil

This randomized, double-blind, phase III study evaluated the efficacy and safety of once-daily treatment with alogliptin (25 mg once daily), alone or with metformin hydrochloride (500 mg once daily or 250 mg twice daily), in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes. The primary endpoint was change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline to the end of treatment (week 24). The least squares (LS) mean (standard error) change in HbA1c from baseline to the end of treatment (week 24) was 0.16 (0.072)% in alogliptin alone, -0.49 (0.049)% in alogliptin/metformin once daily, and -0.60 (0.049)% in alogliptin/metformin twice daily. The LS mean difference in HbA1c change from baseline between alogliptin/metformin once daily and alogliptin alone (alogliptin/metformin once daily minus alogliptin alone) was -0.65% (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.821, -0.480) and between alogliptin/metformin once daily and twice daily (once daily minus twice daily) was 0.11% (95% CI -0.026, 0.247). The overall frequency of adverse events was similar among the groups. This study showed that the efficacy of alogliptin/metformin once daily was superior to alogliptin alone and non-inferior to alogliptin/metformin twice daily, and that alogliptin/metformin once daily was safe and well tolerated in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes.

Topics: Acute Disease; Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Japan; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Nasopharyngitis; Pancreatitis; Piperidines; Treatment Outcome; Uracil

To investigate relationships between glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and reported hypoglycaemia and risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).. The EXAMINE trial randomized 5380 patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and a recent acute coronary syndrome (ACS) event, in 49 countries, to double-blind treatment with alogliptin or placebo in addition to standard of care. We used Cox proportional hazards models to analyse relationships among MACE, HbA1c levels and hypoglycaemic events.. Patients randomized to alogliptin achieved lower HbA1c levels than the placebo group in all baseline HbA1c categories without differences in hypoglycaemia rates. No systematic change was found in MACE rates according to baseline HbA1c (P. There were no relationships between baseline HbA1c levels or HbA1c levels after 1 month of treatment and the risk of MACE. Alogliptin improved glycaemic control without increasing hypoglycaemia. Reported events of hypoglycaemia and serious hypoglycaemia were associated with MACE. These data underscore the safety of alogliptin in improving glycaemic control in T2DM post-ACS. Further study of hypoglycaemia as an independent risk factor for MACE in patients with T2DM and coronary disease is needed.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cohort Studies; Combined Modality Therapy; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Angiopathies; Diabetic Cardiomyopathies; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Double-Blind Method; Drug Resistance; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Risk Factors; Secondary Prevention; Severity of Illness Index; Uracil

This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of 26 weeks of twice-daily (BID) alogliptin + metformin fixed-dose combination (FDC) therapy in Asian patients with type 2 diabetes. Patients aged 18 to 75 years with hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) of 7.5% to 10.0% after ≥2 months of diet and exercise and a 4-week placebo run-in were enrolled. Eligible patients were randomized (1:1:1:1) to placebo, alogliptin 12.5 mg BID, metformin 500 mg BID or alogliptin 12.5 mg plus metformin 500 mg FDC BID. The primary endpoint was change in HbA1c from baseline to end of treatment (Week 26). In total, 647 patients were randomized. The least-squares mean change in HbA1c from baseline to Week 26 was -0.19% with placebo, -0.86% with alogliptin, -1.04% with metformin and -1.53% with alogliptin + metformin FDC. Alogliptin + metformin FDC was significantly more effective ( P  < .0001) in lowering HbA1c than either alogliptin or metformin alone. The safety profile of alogliptin + metformin FDC was similar to that of the individual components alogliptin and metformin. The study demonstrated that treatment with alogliptin + metformin FDC BID resulted in better glycaemic control than either monotherapy and was well tolerated in Asian patients with type 2 diabetes.

Topics: China; Combined Modality Therapy; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diet, Diabetic; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Drug Therapy, Combination; Exercise; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Immunity, Mucosal; Incidence; Malaysia; Metformin; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Republic of Korea; Respiratory Tract Infections; Taiwan; Uracil

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of alogliptin in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM).. This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial. A total of 491 subjects with T2DM were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive alogliptin (25 mg once daily) or placebo for 16 weeks. Among them, 181 were in the monotherapy group (group A), 186 were in the add-on to metformin group (group B), and 124 were in the add-on to pioglitazone group (group C).. After 16 weeks of therapy, glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels decreased in both alogliptin and placebo groups. The mean changes in HbA1c for alogliptin and placebo were 1.00% and 0.43% (P<0.001), 0.91% and 0.23% (P<0.001), and 0.76% and 0.25% (P<0.001) in group A, B and C, respectively. Compared with placebo, alogliptin treatment led to a greater decrease in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and a higher percentage of subjects who achieved HbA1c targets of ≤ 6.5% and ≤ 7.0%. The percentage of subjects who experienced all adverse events including hypoglycemia with alogliptin were comparable to those with placebo.. Alogliptin 25 mg once daily reduced HbA1c and FPG, and increased a greater proportion of subjects achieving HbA1c goals of ≤6.5% and ≤7.0% compared with placebo when used as a monotherapy, add-on to metformin, or add-on to pioglitazone. The hypoglycemia rates and safety profiles with alogliptin were similar to those with placebo.

Topics: Asian People; Blood Glucose; China; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Metformin; Pioglitazone; Piperidines; Safety; Thiazolidinediones; Uracil

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor alogliptin plus metformin (A + M) initial combination therapy versus either as monotherapy in drug-naïve T2DM patients.. This international, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 26-week study involved T2DM patients with hyperglycaemia (HbA1c 7.5-10.0%) following diet/exercise therapy. Patients (N = 784) received placebo, alogliptin (A, 12.5 mg BID or 25 mg QD), metformin (M, 500 or 1000 mg BID) or A + M (12.5/500 or 12.5/1000 mg BID); placebo, A25 for secondary analyses only.. week 26 changes from baseline in HbA1c (primary), fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and 2-h postprandial glucose (PPG); incidences of clinical response and hyperglycaemic rescue.. Week 26 mean HbA1c reductions from baseline (8.45%) were -1.22 and -1.55% with A + M 12.5/500 and 12.5/1000 versus -0.56, -0.65, and -1.11% with A12.5, M500 and M1000 (p<0.001, A + M vs. component monotherapies). FPG reductions were -1.76 and -2.55 mmol/L with 12.5/500 and 12.5/1000 versus -0.54, -0.64 and -1.78 mmol/L with A12.5, M500 and M1000 (p < 0.05, A + M vs. component monotherapies). Significantly more A + M-treated patients achieved HbA1c < 7% (47.1-59.5% vs. 20.2-34.3% with monotherapy), significantly fewer required hyperglycaemic rescue (2.6-12.3% vs. 10.8-22.9% with monotherapy). A + M caused only mild/moderate hypoglycaemia (1.9-5.3%) and weight loss (0.6-1.2 kg).. Alogliptin plus metformin initial combination therapy was well tolerated yet more efficacious in controlling glycaemia in drug-naïve T2DM patients than either as monotherapy.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Treatment Outcome; Uracil

To evaluate the long-term durability of the efficacy of alogliptin compared with glipizide in combination with metformin in people with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on stable-dose metformin.. This multicentre, double-blind, active-controlled study randomized 2639 patients aged 18-80 years to 104 weeks of treatment with metformin in addition to alogliptin 12.5 mg once daily (n = 880), alogliptin 25 mg once daily (n = 885) or glipizide 5 mg once daily, titrated to a maximum of 20 mg (n = 874). The primary endpoint was least square mean change from baseline in HbA1c level at 104 weeks.. The mean patient age was 55.4 years, the mean diabetes duration was 5.5 years and the mean baseline HbA1c was 7.6%. HbA1c reductions at week 104 were -0.68%, -0.72% and -0.59% for alogliptin 12.5 and 25 mg and glipizide, respectively [both doses met the criteria for non-inferiority to glipizide (p<0.001); alogliptin 25 mg met superiority criteria (p=0.010)]. Fasting plasma glucose concentration decreased by 0.05 and 0.18 mmol/l for alogliptin 12.5 and 25 mg, respectively, and increased by 0.30 mmol/l for glipizide (p < 0.001 for both comparisons with glipizide). Mean weight changes were -0.68, -0.89 and 0.95 kg for alogliptin 12.5 and 25 mg and glipizide, respectively (p < 0.001 for both comparisons with glipizide). Hypoglycaemia occurred in 23.2% of patients in the glipizide group vs. 2.5 and 1.4% of patients in the alogliptin 12.5 and 25 mg groups, respectively. Pancreatitis occurred in one patient in the alogliptin 25 mg group and three in the glipizide group.. Alogliptin efficacy was sustained over 2 years in patients with inadequate glycaemic control on metformin alone.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glipizide; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Pancreatitis; Piperidines; Treatment Outcome; Uracil

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of alogliptin added to insulin in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who are poorly controlled with insulin and diet or exercise.. This was a randomized, double-blind, 12-week comparative trial of alogliptin and insulin versus placebo and insulin in 179 patients with T2DM followed by a 40-week, open-label phase in 169 patients on alogliptin and insulin.. Change in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline to the end of double-blind phase (week 12).. The change in HbA1c (least squares means) from baseline to week 12 was -0.96% for the alogliptin and insulin group and -0.29% for the placebo and insulin group. The point estimate (95% confidence interval) intergroup difference was -0.66% ([-0.824%, -0.503%]). In the alogliptin and insulin group, HbA1c started to decrease from week 2 onward and peaked by week 12. The proportions of patients who achieved HbA1c < 8.0, < 7.0 and < 6.0% at week 12 were significantly higher in alogliptin and insulin group (73.0, 23.3 and 1.1%) than in placebo and insulin group (25.0, 5.7 and 0%). Incidences of adverse effects were comparable between groups, with no relevant increases in hypoglycemia or weight gain seen.. Alogliptin 25 mg/day was effective and well tolerated when added to insulin in Japanese patients with inadequately controlled T2DM.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Placebo Effect; Uracil; Weight Gain

To prospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of alogliptin versus glipizide in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) over 1 year of treatment.. This was a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled study of elderly T2DM patients (aged 65-90 years) with mild hyperglycaemia on diet/exercise therapy alone [glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) 6.5-9.0%] or plus oral antidiabetic monotherapy (HbA1c 6.5-8.0%). Patients were randomized to once-daily alogliptin 25 mg or glipizide 5 mg titrated to 10 mg, if needed. Hypoglycaemic episodes were systematically captured under predefined criteria.. In the primary analysis, HbA1c mean changes from a baseline of 7.5% were -0.14% with alogliptin (n = 222) and -0.09% with glipizide (n = 219) at the end of the study, demonstrating non-inferiority of alogliptin to glipizide [least squares (LS) mean difference = -0.05%; one-sided 97.5% confidence interval (CI): -∞, 0.13%]. More clinically relevant HbA1c reductions occurred among patients who completed the study: -0.42 and -0.33% with alogliptin and glipizide, with non-inferiority again confirmed (LS mean difference = -0.09%; one-sided 97.5% CI: -∞, 0.07%). Overall, alogliptin was safe and well tolerated, with notably fewer hypoglycaemic episodes than glipizide [5.4% (31 episodes) vs. 26.0% (232 episodes), respectively]; three patients experienced severe hypoglycaemia, all with glipizide. Alogliptin also resulted in favourable weight changes versus glipizide (-0.62 vs. 0.60 kg at week 52; p < 0.001).. Alogliptin monotherapy maintained glycaemic control comparable to that of glipizide in elderly patients with T2DM over 1 year of treatment, with substantially lower risk of hypoglycaemia and without weight gain.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Dizziness; Double-Blind Method; Female; Glipizide; Glycated Hemoglobin; Headache; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Male; Metformin; Piperidines; Prospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; Triglycerides; Uracil; Weight Gain

Acarbose was administered at 300 mg/day to patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who had been taking 25 mg/day of alogliptin, and levels of blood glucose were analyzed by continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) for 3 days. The mean blood glucose level with acarbose (136.4 ± 30.7 mg/dL) did not differ significantly from that without acarbose (141.7 ± 28.3 mg/dL). However, in the condition of the combination therapy, there were significant decreases in the standard deviation of the mean blood glucose levels for the 24-hour period (27.6 ± 9.1 vs. 16.2 ± 6.9 mg/dL, p<0.001) and mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE) (65.8 ± 26.1 vs. 38.8 ± 19.2 mg/dL, p=0.010). In addition, a meal tolerance test was conducted to monitor changes in insulin secretion and active GLP-1 and total GIP values. Ten subjects (5 males, 5 females) of 54.9 ± 6.9 years with BMI 25.9 ± 5.2 kg/m² and HbAlc 9.2 ± 1.2% were enrolled. In the meal tolerance test, active GLP-1 values before and after acarbose administration were 17.0 ± 5.8 and 24.1 ± 9.3 pmol·hr/mL (p=0.054), respectively, showing an increasing tendency, and total GIP(AUC0-180) values were 685.9 ± 209.7 and 404.4 ± 173.7 pmol·hr/mL, respectively, showing a significant decrease (p=0.010). The results indicate that the combined administration of both inhibitors is effective not only in decreasing blood glucose fluctuations and preventing postprandial insulin secretion. The beneficial effects may also protect the endocrine pancreas and inhibit body weight gain.

Topics: Acarbose; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Drug Therapy, Combination; Enzyme Inhibitors; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glycated Hemoglobin; Glycoside Hydrolase Inhibitors; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Insulin; Insulin Secretion; Islets of Langerhans; Male; Middle Aged; Overweight; Piperidines; Uracil; Weight Gain

The objectives of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of alogliptin versus very low fat/calorie traditional Japanese diet (non-inferiority trial) as an initial therapy for newly diagnosed, drug naïve subjects with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Study design was prospective, randomized, non-double-blind, controlled trial. The study was conducted at outpatient units of municipal hospital. Patients were newly diagnosed, drug naïve patients who visited the outpatient units. The patients randomly received 12.5-25 mg/day alogliptin (n = 25) or severe low calorie traditional Japanese diet (n = 26). The procedure of this trial was assessed by the consolidated standards of reporting trials statement. The primary end point was the change of HbA1c at 3 months. Secondary end points included the changes of fasting blood glucose, insulin, homeostasis model assessment-R (HOMA-R), HOMA-B, body mass index (BMI), and lipid parameters. Similar, significant reductions of HbA1c levels were observed in both groups (from 10.51 to 8.74% for alogliptin and from 10.01 to 8.39% for traditional Japanese diet) without any clinically significant adverse events. In the alogliptin group, some subjects (16%) had mild hypoglycemic evens which could be managed by taking glucose drinks by themselves. HOMA-B significantly increased in both groups with varying degrees, whereas HOMA-R significantly decreased only in the Japanese diet group. Atherogenic lipids, such as, total cholesterol, non-high density lipoprotein cholesterol, and low density lipoprotein cholesterol levels significantly decreased in both groups. BMI had no change in the alogliptin group, whereas it significantly decreased in the Japanese diet group. (1) Concerning its glycemic efficacy, alogliptin is effective and non-inferior to traditional Japanese diet as an initial therapeutic option for newly diagnosed T2DM. However, regarding the reductions of body weight and insulin resistance, traditional Japanese diet is superior. (2) Both alogliptin and traditional Japanese diet have favorable effects on atherogenic lipid profiles.

Topics: Adult; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diet, Diabetic; Diet, Fat-Restricted; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Hospitals, Municipal; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hyperlipidemias; Hypoglycemia; Insulin Resistance; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Outpatient Clinics, Hospital; Patient Dropouts; Piperidines; Uracil; Weight Loss

Alogliptin is a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor under investigation for treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Potential pharmacokinetic (PK) drug-drug interactions of alogliptin with pioglitazone or glyburide were evaluated in healthy adults. In a randomized, 6-sequence, 3-period crossover study (study I), participants (n = 30 enrolled; n = 27 completed) received monotherapy with pioglitazone 45 mg once daily (qd), alogliptin 25 mg qd, or coadministration of the 2 agents. The 12-day treatment periods were separated by a > or =10-day washout interval. In a nonrandomized, single-sequence study (study II), participants (n = 24 completed) received a single 5-mg dose of the sulfonylurea glyburide, alone and after 8 days of dosing with alogliptin 25 mg qd. Sequential samples of blood (both studies) and urine (first study) were obtained for determination of PK parameters for alogliptin, pioglitazone, their metabolites, and glyburide. Minor changes in PK parameters between combination therapy and monotherapy were obtained but not judged to be clinically relevant. The combination treatments were well tolerated, although glyburide frequently caused hypoglycemia. Most adverse events were of mild intensity and occurred with a frequency similar to that with monotherapy. It is concluded that pioglitazone or glyburide can be administered with alogliptin without dose adjustment to any component of the combination therapy.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Cross-Over Studies; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glyburide; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Pioglitazone; Piperidines; Thiazolidinediones; Uracil

To assess the efficacy and safety of alogliptin added to insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with insulin alone or combined with metformin.. In this 26-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 390 patients were randomized to receive alogliptin 12.5 mg (n = 131), alogliptin 25 mg (n = 129) or placebo (n = 130) once daily, as add-on to stable insulin therapy with or without metformin. The primary endpoint was change in haemoglobin A(1C) (HbA(1C)) at week 26.. At week 26, mean HbA(1C) changes from the mean baseline value of 9.3% were significantly greater for alogliptin 12.5 mg (-0.63 +/- 0.08%) and alogliptin 25 mg (-0.71 +/- 0.08%) than placebo (-0.13 +/- 0.08%; p < 0.001). Significantly greater proportions of patients receiving alogliptin 12.5 or 25 mg than placebo had HbA(1C) decreases of > or =0.5, > or =1.0 and > or =1.5%. Insulin doses remained unchanged, and there were no differences in the proportions of patients experiencing hypoglycaemia among placebo (24%), alogliptin 12.5 mg (27%) and alogliptin 25 mg (27%). Mean weight increases from baseline at week 26 were similar for placebo (0.6 +/- 0.2 kg), alogliptin 12.5 mg (0.7 +/- 0.2 kg) and alogliptin 25 mg (0.6 +/- 0.2 kg). Incidences of overall adverse events, and of gastrointestinal, dermatological and infection-related events, were similar among groups.. Adding alogliptin to previous insulin therapy (with or without metformin) significantly improved glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on insulin, without causing weight gain or increasing the incidence of hypoglycaemia. Further studies are warranted to explore the role of alogliptin added to optimized basal insulin regimens.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Treatment Outcome; Uracil; Weight Gain; Young Adult

Alogliptin is a highly selective dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor that is under development for the treatment of type 2 diabetes.. This study was conducted to characterize the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and tolerability of single oral doses of alogliptin in healthy male subjects.. This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in which healthy, nonobese male subjects between the ages of 18 and 55 years were assigned to 1 of 6 cohorts: alogliptin 25, 50, 100, 200, 400, or 800 mg. One subject in each cohort received placebo. An ascending-dose strategy was used, in which each cohort received its assigned dose only after review of the safety data from the previous cohort. Blood and urine were collected over 72 hours after dosing for pharmacokinetic analysis and determination of plasma DPP-4 inhibition and active glucagon-like peptide -1(GLP-1) concentrations.. Thirty-six subjects (66 per cohort) were enrolled and completed the study (29/36 [81% ] white; mean age, 26.6 years; mean weight, 76.0 kg). Alogliptin was rapidly absorbed (median T(max), 1-2 hours) and eliminated slowly (mean t(1/2), 12.4-21.4 hours), primarily via urinary excretion (mean fraction of drug excreted in urine from 0 to 72 hours after dosing, 60%-71%). C(max) and AUC(0-infinity) increased dose proportionally over the range from 25 to 100 mg. The metabolites M-I (N-demethylated) and M-II (N-acetylated) accounted for <2% and <6%, respectively, of alogliptin concentrations in plasma and urine. Across alogliptin doses, mean peak DPP-4 inhibition ranged from 93% to 99%, and mean inhibition at 24 hours after dosing ranged from 74% to 97%. Exposure to active GLP-1 was 2- to 4-fold greater for all alogliptin doses compared with placebo; no dose response was apparent. Hypoglycemia (asymptomatic) was reported in 5 subjects (11 receiving alogliptin 50 mg, 2 receiving alogliptin 200 mg, 1 receiving alogliptin 400 mg, 1 receiving placebo). Other adverse events were reported in 1 subject each: dizziness (alogliptin 100 mg), syncope (alogliptin 200 mg), constipation (alogliptin 200 mg), viral infection (alogliptin 400 mg), hot flush (placebo), and nausea (placebo).. In these healthy male subjects, alogliptin at single doses up to 800 mg inhibited plasma DPP-4 activity, increased active GLP-1, and was generally well tolerated, with no dose-limiting toxicity.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Area Under Curve; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Cohort Studies; Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Male; Middle Aged; Molecular Structure; No-Observed-Adverse-Effect Level; Piperidines; Reference Values; Tandem Mass Spectrometry; Time Factors; Uracil

The aim of this study was to investigate whether daily glycemic profiles and treatment satisfaction would be changed after switching from once-daily 25-mg alogliptin plus twice-daily 250-mg metformin to the fixed-dose combination of 25-mg alogliptin and 500-mg metformin once daily in type 2 diabetic patients. Twenty adult Japanese type 2 diabetic patients in whom once-daily 25-mg alogliptin plus twice-daily 250-mg metformin were switched to the fixed-dose combination of 25-mg alogliptin and 500-mg metformin once daily participated. Before and one month after the switch, participants were asked to perform one day of seven-point self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG), to wear a sensor of flash glucose monitoring for up to 14 days, and to respond to a questionnaire for treatment satisfaction. As a result, the SMBG profiles were significantly changed after the switch (p = 0.021); blood glucose levels 2 hours after breakfast were significantly elevated (p = 0.022), whereas those 2 hours after lunch were significantly reduced (p = 0.036). The flash glucose monitoring also demonstrated a significant change of daily glucose profiles (p < 0.001). The risk of glucose levels <80 mg/dL were decreased from evening to morning, while the risk of glucose levels ≥140 mg/dL were increased. Mean 24-hour glucose values were increased by 5 mg/dL on average (p < 0.001). Treatment satisfaction was significantly improved after the switch (p < 0.001). In conclusion, daily glycemic profiles were significantly changed after switching from once-daily 25-mg alogliptin plus twice-daily 250-mg metformin to the once-daily fixed-dose combination in Japanese type 2 diabetic patients. Treatment satisfaction was significantly improved after the switch.

Topics: Aged; Asian People; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combinations; Drug Substitution; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Japan; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Patient Satisfaction; Piperidines; Prospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; Uracil