allopurinol and Hearing-Loss

Canine leishmaniosis due to Leishmania infantum is a widespread zoonotic disease. Although aminosidine can be an effective treatment, current therapeutic recommendations do not advocate its use, mainly due to concerns regarding the potential nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity of this drug. The aim of this randomized, blinded, controlled study was to evaluate the nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity of aminosidine-allopurinol combination and compare it with that of meglumine antimonate-allopurinol combination in non-azotemic dogs with leishmaniosis. Forty dogs with leishmaniosis were randomly assigned to be treated with either aminosidine at 15 mg/kg, subcutaneously, once daily for 28 days (group A) or with meglumine antimonate at 100 mg/kg, subcutaneously, once daily for 28 days (group B). In addition to either drug, dogs in both groups were administered allopurinol at 10 mg/kg per os twice daily for 2 months. Kidney function was evaluated through measurement of serum creatinine, urea nitrogen, inorganic phosphorus, and cystatin-c concentrations and complete urinalysis, including protein-to-creatinine ratio, at baseline and after 14, 28, and 60 days from the beginning of the treatment. At the same time points, vestibular and auditory functions were evaluated through neurological examination and brainstem auditory evoked response (BAER) recordings of wave I, wave V, inter-wave I-V latencies, and minimum hearing thresholds. None of the dogs developed clinicopathological evidence of kidney disease during the study. Serum creatinine concentration increased >0.3 mg/dl over baseline in 2 dogs in group A and in 5 dogs in group B. Parameters of kidney function were not significantly different or were improved compared to baseline and the only difference between the two groups was the lower concentration of serum creatinine in group A. None of the dogs developed peripheral vestibular syndrome or hearing impairment. At the end of the study, parameters of auditory function were not significantly different or were improved compared to baseline and there were no differences between the two groups. The results of this study show that the nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity of aminosidine, when administered to non-azotemic dogs with leishmaniosis at 15 mg/kg subcutaneously once daily for 28 days along with allopurinol, is minimal and does not differ from that of meglumine antimonate.

Topics: Allopurinol; Animals; Cochlea; Creatinine; Dog Diseases; Dogs; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem; Female; Hearing; Hearing Loss; Injections, Subcutaneous; Kidney; Leishmania infantum; Leishmaniasis, Visceral; Male; Meglumine Antimoniate; Neurologic Examination; Paromomycin; Random Allocation; Vestibule, Labyrinth

Cisplatin ototoxicity has been associated with the generation of toxic levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) which can lead to injury or loss of outer hair cells in the organ of Corti, damage to the stria vascularis, and loss of spiral ganglion cells, resulting in permanent hearing loss. In an attempt to reduce the formation of ROS and to bolster the innate oxidative stress defenses of the cochlea, we tested individual and combined formulations of allopurinol, a xanthine oxidase inhibitor, and ebselen, a glutathione peroxidase mimic. We used an acute cisplatin toxicity rat model (16 mg/kg i.p.) to analyze allopurinol and ebselen alone and in combination for their ability to reduce cisplatin associated hearing loss and nephrotoxicity. The results from our studies indicate that a combined formulation of ebselen and allopurinol affords significant protection to the cochlea and kidney from cisplatin toxicity. In the cochlea, protection is dependent on the preservation of outer hair cell number, while in the kidney, protection is associated with the preservation of proximal tubular epithelia. Further evaluation of the chemoprotective effects of ebselen and allopurinol on cisplatin side effects in the presence of tumor appears warranted.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Allopurinol; Analysis of Variance; Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Audiometry, Evoked Response; Azoles; Cisplatin; Cochlea; Female; Free Radical Scavengers; Hearing Loss; Isoindoles; Kidney; Neuroprotective Agents; Organoselenium Compounds; Rats; Rats, Inbred F344

The elimination of cisplatin ototoxicity is an ongoing concern. This experimental study was undertaken to investigate the effect of oral erdosteine in ameliorating cisplatin-induced ototoxicity. Twenty-eight adult female Wistar albino rats were randomly divided into four equal groups. Group A received an oral carrier vehicle of the drug erdosteine with 0.2 ml of 0.9% saline. Group B was administered only erdosteine (per oral 10 mg/kg twice a day) for 6 days. Group C was injected with cisplatin intraperitoneally (i.p.) on day 0 (16 mg/kg body weight), once only. Group D was given erdosteine (per oral 10 mg/kg/day) 1 day before and for 5 days consecutively after cisplatin injection (16 mg/kg, i.p.). Distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) were elicited in different frequency regions, ranging from 1,001 to 6,299 Hz as DPgram and input/output (I/O) functions from the control and experimental animals. All experimental animals were killed under general anesthesia on day 5, following the last otoacoustic emission measurements. Prior to death, blood samples were drawn for measurement of superoxide dismutase, xanthine oxidase (XO), malondialdehyde and nitric oxide. Initial DPgram and I/O function baseline measurements were similar in all groups prior to any drug administration ( P>0.05). On day 5, intra-subject measurement parameters of DPgrams and I/O functions in the cisplatin group showed significant deterioration ( P <0.05). The other groups revealed no differences between their pre- and post-test drug administration DPgrams and I/O functions at any test frequency ( P>0.05). Comparison of the amplitudes of DPgrams and I/O functions between the cisplatin and control groups showed significant changes ( P <0.05). Biochemical studies noted an increased XO activity following cisplatin administration ( P <0.007). The other biochemical results did not show significant differences between the study and control groups. This study demonstrates that, in rats, erdosteine is protective for cochlear function against the disruptive effects of cisplatin as measured by DPOAEs.

Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Antioxidants; Cisplatin; Female; Hearing Loss; Malondialdehyde; Nitric Oxide; Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous; Random Allocation; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Reactive Oxygen Species; Superoxide Dismutase; Thioglycolates; Thiophenes; Xanthine Oxidase