aliskiren and Drug-Related-Side-Effects-and-Adverse-Reactions

Main pharmacovigilance updates in 2012 are reviewed here. Dabigatran: elderly patients with renal failure are at higher risk of bleeding. Dual renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockade comprising aliskiren is harmful. Incretins: low risk of acute pancreatitis. Interaction between fusidic acid and statins: many reports of rhabdomyolysis. Interactions between boceprevir/telaprevir and antiretroviral therapies: complex, but manageable. Citalopram, ondansetron: maximum recommended doses are reduced. Atomoxetine: significant increase in blood pressure and heart rate in a fraction of exposed patients. Agomelatine: elevated liver enzymes are common. Fingolimod: bradycardia and heart blocks after first dose - stronger safety recommendations regarding use in patients with heart conditions and strengthened cardiovascular monitoring.

Topics: Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors; Age Factors; Aged; Amides; Antihypertensive Agents; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Cardiovascular Diseases; Dabigatran; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Fibrinolytic Agents; Fumarates; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pharmacovigilance; Propylamines

Aliskiren, a drug which inhibits the initial and rate-limiting step of the renin angiotensin aldosterone system (RAAS), recently approved for the treatment of hypertension, may become a reasonable therapeutic choice in a broad number of clinical conditions sharing an increased cardiovascular risk, where the inhibition of the RAAS has been shown to be beneficial.. The present review summarizes the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of aliskiren along with the clinical trials that took into account the effects of aliskiren on blood pressure control and on a number of renal and cardiovascular end points. The specific effects of aliskiren on different populations (e.g., elderly hypertensives, patients with diabetes and hypertension, patients with hypertension and renal impairment) are discussed.. The review discusses the most recent discoveries of the cardiovascular and renal effects of aliskiren, including a comprehensive discussion of the ongoing trials and of the areas of remaining uncertainty.. Aliskiren is a promising drug that may become a convenient choice in several clinical conditions. The full spectrum of the beneficial effects of aliskiren will be fully elucidated when the results of the large ongoing trials become available.

Topics: Amides; Antihypertensive Agents; Cardiovascular Diseases; Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus; Drug Evaluation; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Fumarates; Humans; Hypertension; Kidney Diseases; Renin; Renin-Angiotensin System

To assess the long-term safety and antihypertensive efficacy of aliskiren/valsartan 300/320 mg combination.. This was a 54-week, multicenter, open-label study (core phase), followed by a 26-week extension phase. Efficacy variables were change in msDBP and msSBP from baseline to endpoint (54-week and 80-week). Safety was assessed by monitoring and recording adverse events (AEs). ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00386607 RESULTS: A total of 601 patients (msDBP ≥ 90 and <110 mmHg) entered the 54-week core study. Optional add-on HCT was allowed at week 10 onwards if BP was ≥ 140/90 mmHg at two consecutive visits. Of the 486 patients completed the core study, 180 patients entered the extension phase and received aliskiren/valsartan and add-on HCT (12.5 or 25 mg). Overall the combination of aliskiren/valsartan was well-tolerated and the majority of AEs were mild-to-moderate in severity. The incidence of SAEs was low (core phase: n = 22 [3.7%]; extension phase: n = 4 [2.2%]). Elevated serum potassium (>5.5 mmol/L at any time during the study) was observed in 21 (3.6%) patients. The majority of these elevations were transient and returned to normal in subsequent visits, and the discontinuation rate due to elevated serum potassium was low (0.3% [n = 2]). Decreased serum potassium levels (<3.5 mmol/L at any time during the study) was observed in 26 (4.4%) patients, mainly in patients receiving aliskiren/valsartan/HCT (n = 22; 7.1%). At the 54-week endpoint, a mean BP reduction of 20.5/13.4 mmHg from baseline (baseline BP: 152.9/97.0 mmHg) was observed and 66.9% (n = 398/595) of patients achieved BP control with aliskiren/valsartan with or without HCT. At the end of the extension phase (80-week endpoint), additional reduction in BP was obtained (overall, 28.8/18.3 mmHg) and 86.6% (n = 155/179) of patients achieved BP control with aliskiren/valsartan/HCT. A limitation is the absence of an active comparator group.. Long-term treatment with the combination of aliskiren/valsartan with or without HCT provided clinically meaningful BP reductions and high rates of BP control and was well-tolerated.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Algorithms; Amides; Antihypertensive Agents; Drug Combinations; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Fumarates; Humans; Hydrochlorothiazide; Hypertension; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Tetrazoles; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Valine; Valsartan; Young Adult

To evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of aliskiren in elderly patients (> or =65 years old) with essential hypertension.. In this double-blind, multicenter study, 355 elderly patients with hypertension [office mean sitting systolic blood pressure (msSBP) > or =145-<180 mmHg and mean 24-h ambulatory systolic BP (ASBP) > or =135 mmHg] were randomized to once-daily treatment for 8 weeks with aliskiren 75 mg (n = 91), 150 mg (n = 84), 300 mg (n = 94) or the comparator lisinopril 10 mg (n = 86). The primary efficacy variable was change in mean 24-h ASBP.. At endpoint, aliskiren 75 mg, 150 mg, 300 mg and lisinopril 10 mg lowered mean 24-h ASBP (least-squares mean+/-SEM) by 8.4+/-0.8, 7.1+/-0.8, 8.7+/-0.8 and 10.2+/-0.9 mmHg, and mean 24-h ambulatory diastolic BP by 4.5+/-0.5, 3.6+/-0.5, 3.9+/-0.5 and 6.3+/-0.5 mmHg, respectively, with no significant difference between aliskiren doses. The trough-to-peak ratio for ASBP reduction with aliskiren 75 mg, 150 mg, 300 mg and lisinopril 10 mg was 0.77, 0.64, 0.79 and 0.87, respectively. All treatments lowered office msSBP and mean sitting diastolic BP (msDBP) compared with baseline. A significantly greater proportion of patients receiving aliskiren 300 mg achieved BP control (msSBP/msDBP <140/90 mmHg) compared with those receiving aliskiren 75 mg (36.2% vs 24.2%, p = 0.033). There was no evidence of dose-related increases in the rate of adverse events with aliskiren treatment.. Aliskiren, a novel direct renin inhibitor, provides effective 24-h BP lowering with no evidence of dose-related increases in the incidence of adverse events in elderly patients with hypertension.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Amides; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Female; Fumarates; Humans; Hypertension; Lisinopril; Male; Renin

We aimed to analyze benefits and risks of aliskiren treatment in older adults (⩾ 65 years) in clinical practice. Patients (n = 14,986) were assigned to either aliskiren (ALIS), an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker (ACEi/ARB), or an agent not blocking the renin-angiotensin system (non-RAS). Older adults (n = 7396) had a longer history of hypertension (8.7 vs 4.7 years; P < 0.0001), lower mean diastolic blood pressure (DBP; 87.7 ± 11.0 vs 92.1 ± 11.0 mm Hg) and more renal (12.0 vs 5.6%; P < 0.0001) or cardiovascular disease (44.0 vs 18.9%; P < 0.0001); 4548 received aliskiren (68.8%), 1215 ACEi/ARBs (18.4%) and 850 non-RAS treatments (12.9%). Office BP at 1 year was reduced by 18.4 ± 21.5/7.2 ± 12.0 mm Hg. BP reductions were greater (19.5 ± 21.7/7.6 ± 12.1 mm Hg) in the aliskiren group than in the ACEi/ARB (15.6 ± 20.9/6.4 ± 11.9) and non-RAS groups (16.1 ± 20.7/6.5 ± 11.7 mm Hg), respectively (P<0.0001 for systolic BP (SBP) and <0.01 for DBP). After multivariable adjustment, differences in SBP reductions were clinically irrelevant and no differences were noted for DBP. Adverse effects were higher in older adults with no differences between treatment groups. In conclusion, the present analysis of a large, unselected cohort of patients in clinical practice from the 3A study, offers real-life evidence of the effectiveness and safety of aliskiren for the treatment of hypertension in older adults.

Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Amides; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Female; Fumarates; Germany; Humans; Hypertension; Male; Middle Aged; Renin; Renin-Angiotensin System; Risk Assessment; Treatment Outcome

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a significant concern in drug development due to the poor concordance between preclinical and clinical findings of liver toxicity. We hypothesized that the DILI types (hepatotoxic side effects) seen in the clinic can be translated into the development of predictive in silico models for use in the drug discovery phase. We identified 13 hepatotoxic side effects with high accuracy for classifying marketed drugs for their DILI potential. We then developed in silico predictive models for each of these 13 side effects, which were further combined to construct a DILI prediction system (DILIps). The DILIps yielded 60-70% prediction accuracy for three independent validation sets. To enhance the confidence for identification of drugs that cause severe DILI in humans, the "Rule of Three" was developed in DILIps by using a consensus strategy based on 13 models. This gave high positive predictive value (91%) when applied to an external dataset containing 206 drugs from three independent literature datasets. Using the DILIps, we screened all the drugs in DrugBank and investigated their DILI potential in terms of protein targets and therapeutic categories through network modeling. We demonstrated that two therapeutic categories, anti-infectives for systemic use and musculoskeletal system drugs, were enriched for DILI, which is consistent with current knowledge. We also identified protein targets and pathways that are related to drugs that cause DILI by using pathway analysis and co-occurrence text mining. While marketed drugs were the focus of this study, the DILIps has a potential as an evaluation tool to screen and prioritize new drug candidates or chemicals, such as environmental chemicals, to avoid those that might cause liver toxicity. We expect that the methodology can be also applied to other drug safety endpoints, such as renal or cardiovascular toxicity.

Topics: Animals; Anti-Infective Agents; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Databases, Factual; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Humans; Liver; Models, Biological; Predictive Value of Tests