alanine has been researched along with Kidney Failure in 9 studies
Alanine: A non-essential amino acid that occurs in high levels in its free state in plasma. It is produced from pyruvate by transamination. It is involved in sugar and acid metabolism, increases IMMUNITY, and provides energy for muscle tissue, BRAIN, and the CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM.
alanine : An alpha-amino acid that consists of propionic acid bearing an amino substituent at position 2.
Kidney Failure: A severe irreversible decline in the ability of kidneys to remove wastes, concentrate URINE, and maintain ELECTROLYTE BALANCE; BLOOD PRESSURE; and CALCIUM metabolism.
Excerpt | Relevance | Reference |
---|---|---|
"Treatment with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate has been associated with renal toxicity or reductions in bone mineral density, or both, in some patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection." | 9.34 | Switching from tenofovir disoproxil fumarate to tenofovir alafenamide in virologically suppressed patients with chronic hepatitis B: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3, multicentre non-inferiority study. ( Agarwal, K; Ahn, SH; Bae, H; Buti, M; Chan, HLY; Chen, CY; Chuang, WL; Flaherty, JF; Fung, S; Gaggar, A; Lampertico, P; Lau, A; Lim, YS; Liu, Y; Ma, X; Ramji, A; Subramanian, GM; Suri, V; Tak, WY; Tam, E; Tan, SK; Trinh, H; Wu, G; Yoon, SK, 2020) |
"Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) has recently been approved for chronic hepatitis B (CHB)." | 8.95 | Tenofovir alafenamide as compared to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in the management of chronic hepatitis B with recent trends in patient demographics. ( Hsu, YC; Nguyen, MH; Wei, MT, 2017) |
"Treatment with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate has been associated with renal toxicity or reductions in bone mineral density, or both, in some patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection." | 5.34 | Switching from tenofovir disoproxil fumarate to tenofovir alafenamide in virologically suppressed patients with chronic hepatitis B: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3, multicentre non-inferiority study. ( Agarwal, K; Ahn, SH; Bae, H; Buti, M; Chan, HLY; Chen, CY; Chuang, WL; Flaherty, JF; Fung, S; Gaggar, A; Lampertico, P; Lau, A; Lim, YS; Liu, Y; Ma, X; Ramji, A; Subramanian, GM; Suri, V; Tak, WY; Tam, E; Tan, SK; Trinh, H; Wu, G; Yoon, SK, 2020) |
"Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), an ester prodrug of tenofovir (TFV), is one of the recommended drugs for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients." | 4.98 | Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) treatment of HBV, what are the unanswered questions? ( Grossi, G; Lampertico, P; Loglio, A; Viganò, M, 2018) |
"Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) has recently been approved for chronic hepatitis B (CHB)." | 4.95 | Tenofovir alafenamide as compared to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in the management of chronic hepatitis B with recent trends in patient demographics. ( Hsu, YC; Nguyen, MH; Wei, MT, 2017) |
"We pooled clinical renal safety data across 26 treatment-naive and antiretroviral switch studies to compare the incidence of proximal renal tubulopathy and discontinuation due to renal adverse events between participants taking TAF-containing regimens vs." | 2.61 | Renal safety of tenofovir alafenamide vs. tenofovir disoproxil fumarate: a pooled analysis of 26 clinical trials. ( Arribas, JR; Brainard, D; Carter, C; Clarke, AE; Das, M; Elion, RA; Eron, JJ; Esser, S; Guo, S; Gupta, SK; Martin, H; Mudrikova, T; Negredo, E; Orkin, C; Podzamczer, D; Post, FA; Pozniak, AL; Rockstroh, JK; Sax, PE; SenGupta, D; Stellbrink, HJ; Waters, L; Wohl, DA; Zhong, L, 2019) |
"Salt-induced hypertension is one of the major issues worldwide and one of the main factors involved in heart and kidney failure." | 1.72 | Benincasa hispida extracts positively regulated high salt-induced hypertension in Dahl salt-sensitive rats: Impact on biochemical profile and metabolic patterns. ( Ahmad, H; Ahmad, N; Chen, M; Du, J; Jin, Y; Khan, A; Li, X; Ouyang, Y; Tian, Z; Yang, P; Yang, Z; Zeng, L; Zhao, X; Zheng, X, 2022) |
"A reversible acute renal failure with no proximal tubulopathy and neuropsychiatric issues are discussed." | 1.51 | Overdose of elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide in an HIV-1-infected subject with attempted suicide. ( Álvarez, H; Díaz-Cambre, H; García-González, J; Llibre, JM; Mariño, A; Valcarce, N, 2019) |
"Population pharmacokinetic analyses were performed with plasma concentrations from 26 healthy volunteers and 41 patients." | 1.33 | Population pharmacokinetic analysis of panipenem/betamipron in patients with various degrees of renal function. ( Ishizuka, H; Naganuma, H; Tajima, N, 2006) |
Timeframe | Studies, this research(%) | All Research% |
---|---|---|
pre-1990 | 0 (0.00) | 18.7374 |
1990's | 0 (0.00) | 18.2507 |
2000's | 2 (22.22) | 29.6817 |
2010's | 4 (44.44) | 24.3611 |
2020's | 3 (33.33) | 2.80 |
Authors | Studies |
---|---|
Ahmad, H | 1 |
Zhao, X | 1 |
Ahmad, N | 1 |
Khan, A | 1 |
Jin, Y | 1 |
Du, J | 1 |
Zheng, X | 1 |
Zeng, L | 1 |
Ouyang, Y | 1 |
Yang, P | 1 |
Chen, M | 1 |
Li, X | 1 |
Yang, Z | 1 |
Tian, Z | 1 |
Lampertico, P | 2 |
Buti, M | 1 |
Fung, S | 1 |
Ahn, SH | 1 |
Chuang, WL | 1 |
Tak, WY | 1 |
Ramji, A | 1 |
Chen, CY | 1 |
Tam, E | 1 |
Bae, H | 1 |
Ma, X | 1 |
Flaherty, JF | 1 |
Gaggar, A | 1 |
Lau, A | 1 |
Liu, Y | 1 |
Wu, G | 1 |
Suri, V | 1 |
Tan, SK | 1 |
Subramanian, GM | 1 |
Trinh, H | 1 |
Yoon, SK | 1 |
Agarwal, K | 1 |
Lim, YS | 1 |
Chan, HLY | 1 |
Ding, Y | 1 |
Lin, H | 1 |
Chen, X | 1 |
Zhu, B | 1 |
Xu, X | 2 |
Shen, W | 1 |
Gao, M | 1 |
He, N | 1 |
Hsu, YC | 1 |
Wei, MT | 1 |
Nguyen, MH | 1 |
Viganò, M | 1 |
Loglio, A | 1 |
Grossi, G | 1 |
Álvarez, H | 1 |
Mariño, A | 1 |
Valcarce, N | 1 |
García-González, J | 1 |
Díaz-Cambre, H | 1 |
Llibre, JM | 1 |
Gupta, SK | 1 |
Post, FA | 1 |
Arribas, JR | 1 |
Eron, JJ | 1 |
Wohl, DA | 1 |
Clarke, AE | 1 |
Sax, PE | 1 |
Stellbrink, HJ | 1 |
Esser, S | 1 |
Pozniak, AL | 1 |
Podzamczer, D | 1 |
Waters, L | 1 |
Orkin, C | 1 |
Rockstroh, JK | 1 |
Mudrikova, T | 1 |
Negredo, E | 1 |
Elion, RA | 1 |
Guo, S | 1 |
Zhong, L | 1 |
Carter, C | 1 |
Martin, H | 1 |
Brainard, D | 1 |
SenGupta, D | 1 |
Das, M | 1 |
Tajima, N | 1 |
Ishizuka, H | 1 |
Naganuma, H | 1 |
Al Banchaabouchi, M | 1 |
Marescau, B | 1 |
D'Hooge, R | 1 |
Engelborghs, S | 1 |
De Deyn, PP | 1 |
Trial | Phase | Enrollment | Study Type | Start Date | Status | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Switching From Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate (TDF) 300 mg QD to Tenofovir Alafenamide (TAF) 25 mg QD in Subjects With Chronic Hepatitis B Who Are Virologically Suppressed[NCT02979613] | Phase 3 | 490 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2016-12-29 | Completed | ||
A Prospective Cohort Study of Tenofovir Alafenamide Switching Therapy in Kidney or Liver Transplant Recipients With Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection[NCT05410496] | Phase 4 | 50 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2021-06-22 | Recruiting | ||
A Phase 3b, Randomized, Double-Blind, Switch Study to Evaluate F/TAF in HIV-1 Infected Subjects Who Are Virologically Suppressed on Regimens Containing ABC/3TC[NCT02469246] | Phase 3 | 567 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2015-06-29 | Completed | ||
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of GS-9883/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide Versus Dolutegravir + Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide in HIV-1 Infected, Antiretroviral Treatment-Naive Adults[NCT02607956] | Phase 3 | 657 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2015-11-11 | Completed | ||
A Phase 3, Open-Label Study to Evaluate Switching From a TDF-Containing Combination Regimen to a TAF-Containing Combination Single Tablet Regimen (STR) in Virologically-Suppressed, HIV-1 Positive Subjects[NCT01815736] | Phase 3 | 1,443 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2013-03-27 | Completed | ||
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024] |
"Cockcroft-Gault formula is as follows:~For men: Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) = (140 - age in years) * body weight in kg / 72 * serum creatinine (mg/dL)~For women: GFR = 0.85 * (140 - age in years) * body weight in kg / 72 * serum creatinine (mg/dL).~Change from baseline was calculated as the value at Week 96 minus the value at Baseline." (NCT02979613)
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 96
Intervention | mL/min (Median) |
---|---|
TAF 25 mg | 1.626 |
TDF 300 mg | 0.544 |
"Cockcroft-Gault formula is as follows:~For men: Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) = (140 - age in years) * body weight in kg / 72 * serum creatinine (mg/dL)~For women: GFR = 0.85 * (140 - age in years) * body weight in kg / 72 * serum creatinine (mg/dL).~Change from baseline was calculated as the value at Week 48 minus the value at Baseline." (NCT02979613)
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 48
Intervention | mL/min (Median) |
---|---|
TAF 25 mg | 2.240 |
TDF 300 mg | -1.722 |
The FibroTest score is used to assess liver fibrosis. Scores range from 0.00 to 1.00, with higher scores indicating a greater degree of fibrosis. Change from baseline was calculated as the value at Week 48 minus the value at Baseline. (NCT02979613)
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 48
Intervention | scores on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
TAF 25 mg | -0.02 |
TDF 300 mg | -0.01 |
The FibroTest score is used to assess liver fibrosis. Scores range from 0.00 to 1.00, with higher scores indicating a greater degree of fibrosis. Change from baseline was calculated as the value at Week 96 minus the value at Baseline. (NCT02979613)
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 96
Intervention | scores on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
TAF 25 mg | -0.03 |
TDF 300 mg | -0.03 |
Percent Change = Change from baseline at a postbaseline visit/baseline * 100%. (NCT02979613)
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 96
Intervention | percent change (Mean) |
---|---|
TAF 25 mg | 1.157 |
TDF 300 mg | 0.180 |
Percent Change = Change from baseline at a postbaseline visit/baseline * 100%. (NCT02979613)
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 48
Intervention | percent change (Mean) |
---|---|
TAF 25 mg | 0.659 |
TDF 300 mg | -0.507 |
Percent Change = Change from baseline at a postbaseline visit/baseline * 100%. (NCT02979613)
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 48
Intervention | percent change (Mean) |
---|---|
TAF 25 mg | 1.743 |
TDF 300 mg | -0.138 |
Percent Change = Change from baseline at a postbaseline visit/baseline * 100%. (NCT02979613)
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 96
Intervention | percent change (Mean) |
---|---|
TAF 25 mg | 2.330 |
TDF 300 mg | 1.726 |
HBeAg loss was defined as HBeAg changing from positive at baseline to negative at a postbaseline visit with baseline HBeAb negative or missing. The M = F approach was used for this analysis. (NCT02979613)
Timeframe: Week 96
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
TAF 25 mg | 17.9 |
TDF 300 mg | 9.0 |
HBeAg seroconversion was defined as HBeAg loss and HBeAb changing from negative/missing at baseline to positive at a postbaseline visit. The M = F approach was used for this analysis. (NCT02979613)
Timeframe: Week 48
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
TAF 25 mg | 2.6 |
TDF 300 mg | 0.0 |
HBeAg seroconversion was defined as HBeAg loss and HBeAb changing from negative/missing at baseline to positive at a postbaseline visit. The M = F approach was used for this analysis. (NCT02979613)
Timeframe: Week 96
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
TAF 25 mg | 5.1 |
TDF 300 mg | 2.6 |
HBsAg loss was defined as HBsAg changing from positive at baseline to negative at a postbaseline visit with baseline HBsAb negative or missing. The M = F approach was used for this analysis. (NCT02979613)
Timeframe: Week 96
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
TAF 25 mg | 1.6 |
TDF 300 mg | 2.4 |
HBsAg seroconversion was defined as HBsAg loss and HBsAb changes from negative/missing at baseline to positive at a postbaseline visit. The M = F approach was used for this analysis. (NCT02979613)
Timeframe: Week 48
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
TAF 25 mg | 0.0 |
TDF 300 mg | 0.0 |
HBsAg seroconversion was defined as HBsAg loss and HBsAb changes from negative/missing at baseline to positive at a postbaseline visit. The M = F approach was used for this analysis. (NCT02979613)
Timeframe: Week 96
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
TAF 25 mg | 0.8 |
TDF 300 mg | 0.4 |
The percentage of participants with HBV DNA < 20 IU/mL at Week 48 was analyzed, which included participants who have the last available on-treatment HBV DNA, 20 IU/mL in the Week 48 analysis window. Missing=Failure (M = F) approach was used for analysis. (NCT02979613)
Timeframe: Weeks 48
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
TAF 25 mg | 96.3 |
TDF 300 mg | 96.3 |
The percentage of participants with HBV DNA < 20 IU/mL at Week 96 was analyzed, which included participants who have the last available on-treatment HBV DNA, 20 IU/mL in the Week 96 analysis window. M = F approach was used for analysis. (NCT02979613)
Timeframe: Week 96
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
TAF 25 mg | 94.7 |
TDF 300 mg | 93.9 |
"The percentage of participants with HBV DNA ≥ 20 IU/mL at Week 96 was analyzed using the modified US FDA-defined snapshot algorithm, which included participants who:~Had the last available on-treatment HBV DNA ≥ 20 IU/mL in the Week 96 analysis window (from Day 589 to Day 840, inclusive), or~Did not have on-treatment HBV DNA data available in the Week 96 analysis window and~Discontinued study drug prior to or in the Week 96 analysis window due to lack of efficacy, or~Discontinued study drug prior to or in the Week 96 analysis window due to reason other than lack of efficacy and had the last available on-treatment HBV DNA ≥ 20 IU/mL" (NCT02979613)
Timeframe: Week 96
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
TAF 25 mg | 0.4 |
TDF 300 mg | 0.4 |
HBeAg loss was defined as HBeAg changing from positive at baseline to negative at a postbaseline visit with baseline HBeAb negative or missing. The M = F approach was used for this analysis. (NCT02979613)
Timeframe: Week 48
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
TAF 25 mg | 7.7 |
TDF 300 mg | 6.4 |
HBsAg loss was defined as HBsAg changing from positive at baseline to negative at a postbaseline visit with baseline HBsAb negative or missing. The M = F approach was used for this analysis. (NCT02979613)
Timeframe: Week 48
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
TAF 25 mg | 0.0 |
TDF 300 mg | 2.0 |
"The percentage of participants with HBV DNA ≥ 20 IU/mL at Week 48 was analyzed using the modified US FDA-defined snapshot algorithm, which included participants who:~Had the last available on-treatment HBV DNA ≥ 20 IU/mL in the Week 48 analysis window (from Day 295 to Day 378, inclusive), or~Did not have on-treatment HBV DNA data available in the Week 48 analysis window and~Discontinued study drug prior to or in the Week 48 analysis window due to lack of efficacy, or~Discontinued study drug prior to or in the Week 48 analysis window due to reason other than lack of efficacy and had the last available on-treatment HBV DNA ≥ 20 IU/mL" (NCT02979613)
Timeframe: Week 48
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
TAF 25 mg | 0.4 |
TDF 300 mg | 0.4 |
The percentage of participants with HBV DNA < 20 IU/mL at Week 48 was analyzed, which included participants who have the last available on-treatment HBV DNA, 20 IU/mL in the Week 48 analysis window. The method of determining percentage of participants with HBV DNA levels <20 IU/mL (target detected/not detected i.e., lower limit of detection) at Week 48, was handled by M = F, and Missing=Excluded (M = E) approaches. (NCT02979613)
Timeframe: Week 48
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
M = F Approach: < 20 IU/mL Target Not Detected | M = F Approach: < 20 IU/mL Target Detected | M = E Approach: < 20 IU/mL Target Not Detected | M = E Approach: < 20 IU/mL Target Detected | |
TAF 25 mg | 63.4 | 32.9 | 65.5 | 34.0 |
TDF 300 mg | 62.0 | 34.3 | 64.1 | 35.4 |
The percentage of participants with HBV DNA < 20 IU/mL at Week 96 was analyzed, which included participants who have the last available on-treatment HBV DNA, 20 IU/mL in the Week 96 analysis window. The method of determining percentage of participants with HBV DNA levels <20 IU/mL (target detected/not detected i.e., lower limit of detection) at Week 96, was handled by Missing=Failure (M = F), and Missing=Excluded (M = E) approaches. (NCT02979613)
Timeframe: Week 96
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
M = F Approach: < 20 IU/mL Target Not Detected | M = F Approach: < 20 IU/mL Target Detected | M = E Approach: < 20 IU/mL Target Not Detected | M = E Approach: < 20 IU/mL Target Detected | |
TAF 25 mg | 65.8 | 28.8 | 69.3 | 30.3 |
TDF 300 mg | 66.1 | 27.8 | 70.1 | 29.4 |
Central laboratory ULN for ALT were as follows: ≤ 43 U/L for males aged 18 to < 69 years and ≤ 35 U/L for males aged ≥ 69 years; ≤ 34 U/L for females aged 18 to < 69 years and ≤ 32 U/L for females aged ≥ 69 years. The ULN for ALT using the 2018 AASLD normal range was 25 U/L for females and 35 U/L for males. M = F approach was used for analysis. (NCT02979613)
Timeframe: Week 48
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | |
---|---|---|
Central Laboratory Criteria | AASLD Criteria | |
TAF 25 mg | 89.3 | 79.0 |
TDF 300 mg | 84.9 | 75.1 |
Central laboratory ULN for ALT were as follows: ≤ 43 U/L for males aged 18 to < 69 years and ≤ 35 U/L for males aged ≥ 69 years; ≤ 34 U/L for females aged 18 to < 69 years and ≤ 32 U/L for females aged ≥ 69 years. The ULN for ALT using the 2018 AASLD normal range was 25 U/L for females and 35 U/L for males. M = F approach was used for analysis. (NCT02979613)
Timeframe: Week 96
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | |
---|---|---|
Central Laboratory Criteria | AASLD Criteria | |
TAF 25 mg | 88.5 | 80.7 |
TDF 300 mg | 91.4 | 86.5 |
ALT normalization was defined as an ALT value that changed from above the normal range at baseline to within the normal range at the given postbaseline visit. Central laboratory ULN for ALT were as follows: ≤ 43 U/L for males aged 18 to < 69 years and ≤ 35 U/L for males aged ≥ 69 years; ≤ 34 U/L for females aged 18 to < 69 years and ≤ 32 U/L for females aged ≥ 69 years. The ULN for ALT using the 2018 AASLD normal range was 25 U/L for females and 35 U/L for males. M = F approach was used for analysis. (NCT02979613)
Timeframe: Week 48
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | |
---|---|---|
Central Laboratory Criteria | AASLD Criteria | |
TAF 25 mg | 50.0 | 50.0 |
TDF 300 mg | 36.8 | 26.4 |
ALT normalization was defined as an ALT value that changed from above the normal range at baseline to within the normal range at the given postbaseline visit. Central laboratory ULN for ALT were as follows: ≤ 43 U/L for males aged 18 to < 69 years and ≤ 35 U/L for males aged ≥ 69 years; ≤ 34 U/L for females aged 18 to < 69 years and ≤ 32 U/L for females aged ≥ 69 years. The ULN for ALT using the 2018 AASLD normal range was 25 U/L for females and 35 U/L for males. M = F approach was used for analysis. (NCT02979613)
Timeframe: Week 96
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | |
---|---|---|
Central Laboratory Criteria | AASLD Criteria | |
TAF 25 mg | 56.3 | 55.8 |
TDF 300 mg | 78.9 | 73.6 |
(NCT02469246)
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 48
Intervention | cells/µL (Mean) |
---|---|
F/TAF | -30 |
ABC/3TC | 2 |
(NCT02469246)
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 96
Intervention | cells/μL (Mean) |
---|---|
F/TAF | -29 |
ABC/3TC | 10 |
(NCT02469246)
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 96
Intervention | percent change (Mean) |
---|---|
F/TAF | 0.169 |
ABC/3TC | 0.021 |
(NCT02469246)
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 48
Intervention | percent change (Mean) |
---|---|
F/TAF | 0.246 |
ABC/3TC | 0.086 |
(NCT02469246)
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 48
Intervention | percent change (Mean) |
---|---|
F/TAF | 0.081 |
ABC/3TC | -0.052 |
(NCT02469246)
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 96
Intervention | percent change (Mean) |
---|---|
F/TAF | 0.178 |
ABC/3TC | 0.235 |
The percentage of participants achieving HIV-1 RNA < 20 copies/mL at Week 48 was analyzed using the snapshot algorithm, which defines a participant's virologic response status using only the viral load at the predefined time point within an allowed window of time, along with study drug discontinuation status. (NCT02469246)
Timeframe: Week 48
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
F/TAF | 85.7 |
ABC/3TC | 87.3 |
The percentage of participants achieving HIV-1 RNA < 20 copies/mL at Week 96 was analyzed using the snapshot algorithm, which defines a participant's virologic response status using only the viral load at the predefined time point within an allowed window of time, along with study drug discontinuation status. (NCT02469246)
Timeframe: Week 96
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
F/TAF | 80.4 |
ABC/3TC | 86.2 |
The percentage of participants achieving HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week 48 was analyzed using the snapshot algorithm, which defines a participant's virologic response status using only the viral load at the predefined time point within an allowed window of time, along with study drug discontinuation status. (NCT02469246)
Timeframe: Week 48
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
F/TAF | 88.6 |
ABC/3TC | 92.4 |
The percentage of participants achieving HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week 96 was analyzed using the snapshot algorithm, which defines a participant's virologic response status using only the viral load at the predefined time point within an allowed window of time, along with study drug discontinuation status. (NCT02469246)
Timeframe: Week 96
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
F/TAF | 82.1 |
ABC/3TC | 88.4 |
The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 copies/mL at Week 48 was analyzed using the snapshot algorithm, which defines a participant's virologic response status using only the viral load at the predefined time point within an allowed window of time, along with study drug discontinuation status. (NCT02469246)
Timeframe: Week 48
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
F/TAF | 1.8 |
ABC/3TC | 0.7 |
The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 copies/mL at Week 96 was analyzed using the snapshot algorithm, which defines a participant's virologic response status using only the viral load at the predefined time point within an allowed window of time, along with study drug discontinuation status. (NCT02469246)
Timeframe: Week 96
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
F/TAF | 2.5 |
ABC/3TC | 1.1 |
(NCT02607956)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 144
Intervention | cells/μL (Mean) |
---|---|
B/F/TAF | 278 |
DTG + F/TAF | 289 |
(NCT02607956)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 48
Intervention | cells/μL (Mean) |
---|---|
B/F/TAF | 180 |
DTG + F/TAF | 201 |
(NCT02607956)
Timeframe: Baseline, open-label Week 48
Intervention | cells/μL (Mean) |
---|---|
All B/F/TAF | 304 |
DTG + F/TAF to B/F/TAF | 9 |
(NCT02607956)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 96
Intervention | cells/μL (Mean) |
---|---|
B/F/TAF | 237 |
DTG + F/TAF | 281 |
(NCT02607956)
Timeframe: Baseline, open-label Week 96
Intervention | cells/µL (Mean) |
---|---|
All B/F/TAF | 336 |
DTG + F/TAF to B/F/TAF | -10 |
(NCT02607956)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 144
Intervention | log10 copies/mL (Mean) |
---|---|
B/F/TAF | -3.06 |
DTG + F/TAF | -3.11 |
(NCT02607956)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 48
Intervention | log10 copies/mL (Mean) |
---|---|
B/F/TAF | -3.07 |
DTG + F/TAF | -3.12 |
(NCT02607956)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 96
Intervention | log10 copies/mL (Mean) |
---|---|
B/F/TAF | -3.08 |
DTG + F/TAF | -3.10 |
The percentage of participants achieving HIV-1 RNA < 20 copies/mL at Week 144 was analyzed using the snapshot algorithm, which defines a participant's virologic response status using only the viral load at the predefined time point within an allowed window of time, along with study drug discontinuation status. (NCT02607956)
Timeframe: Week 144
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
B/F/TAF | 77.5 |
DTG + F/TAF | 79.1 |
The percentage of participants achieving HIV-1 RNA < 20 copies/mL at Week 48 was analyzed using the snapshot algorithm, which defines a participant's virologic response status using only the viral load at the predefined time point within an allowed window of time, along with study drug discontinuation status. (NCT02607956)
Timeframe: Week 48
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
B/F/TAF | 82.2 |
DTG + F/TAF | 87.1 |
The percentage of participants achieving HIV-1 RNA < 20 copies/mL at Week 96 was analyzed using the snapshot algorithm, which defines a participant's virologic response status using only the viral load at the predefined time point within an allowed window of time, along with study drug discontinuation status. (NCT02607956)
Timeframe: Week 96
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
B/F/TAF | 77.5 |
DTG + F/TAF | 80.3 |
The percentage of participants achieving HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week 144 was analyzed using the snapshot algorithm, which defines a participant's virologic response status using only the viral load at the predefined time point within an allowed window of time, along with study drug discontinuation status. (NCT02607956)
Timeframe: Week 144
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
B/F/TAF | 81.9 |
DTG + F/TAF | 84.0 |
The percentage of participants achieving HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week 48 was analyzed using the snapshot algorithm, which defines a participant's virologic response status using only the viral load at the predefined time point within an allowed window of time, along with study drug discontinuation status. (NCT02607956)
Timeframe: Week 48
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
B/F/TAF | 89.4 |
DTG + F/TAF | 92.9 |
The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL was analyzed using Missing = Excluded for imputing missing HIV-1 RNA values using the All B/F/TAF Analysis Set for the all B/F/TAF analysis. All missing data was excluded in the computation of the percentages (ie, missing data points were excluded from both the numerator and denominator in the computation). The denominator for percentages at a visit was the number of participants in the all B/F/TAF analysis set with nonmissing HIV-1 RNA value at that visit. (NCT02607956)
Timeframe: Baseline, open-label Week 48
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
All B/F/TAF | 99.2 |
DTG + F/TAF to B/F/TAF | 99.6 |
The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL was analyzed using Missing = Failure for imputing missing HIV-1 RNA values using the All B/F/TAF Analysis Set for the all B/F/TAF analysis. All missing data was treated as HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 copies/mL. The denominator for percentages was the number of participants in all B/F/TAF analysis set. (NCT02607956)
Timeframe: Baseline, open-label Week 48
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
All B/F/TAF | 75.3 |
DTG + F/TAF to B/F/TAF | 84.5 |
The percentage of participants achieving HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week 96 was analyzed using the snapshot algorithm, which defines a participant's virologic response status using only the viral load at the predefined time point within an allowed window of time, along with study drug discontinuation status. (NCT02607956)
Timeframe: Week 96
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
B/F/TAF | 84.1 |
DTG + F/TAF | 86.5 |
The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL was analyzed using Missing = Excluded for imputing missing HIV-1 RNA values using the All B/F/TAF Analysis Set for the all B/F/TAF analysis. All missing data was excluded in the computation of the percentages (ie, missing data points were excluded from both the numerator and denominator in the computation). The denominator for percentages at a visit was the number of participants in the all B/F/TAF analysis set with nonmissing HIV-1 RNA value at that visit. (NCT02607956)
Timeframe: Baseline, open-label Week 96
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
All B/F/TAF | 99.5 |
DTG + F/TAF to B/F/TAF | 99.1 |
The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL was analyzed using Missing = Failure for imputing missing HIV-1 RNA values using the All B/F/TAF Analysis Set for the all B/F/TAF analysis. All missing data was treated as HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 copies/mL. The denominator for percentages was the number of participants in all B/F/TAF analysis set. (NCT02607956)
Timeframe: Baseline, open-label Week 96
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
All B/F/TAF | 68.1 |
DTG + F/TAF to B/F/TAF | 87.5 |
The percentage of participants achieving HIV-1 RNA < 20 copies/mL at Week 96 was analyzed using the snapshot algorithm, which defines a patient's virologic response status using only the viral load at the predefined time point within an allowed window of time, along with study drug discontinuation status. (NCT01815736)
Timeframe: Week 96
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
E/C/F/TAF | 90.6 |
Stay on Baseline Treatment Regimen (SBR) | 85.3 |
The percentage of participants achieving HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week 96 was analyzed using the snapshot algorithm, which defines a patient's virologic response status using only the viral load at the predefined time point within an allowed window of time, along with study drug discontinuation status. (NCT01815736)
Timeframe: Week 96
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
E/C/F/TAF | 92.8 |
Stay on Baseline Treatment Regimen (SBR) | 89.1 |
The analysis of CD4 cell count included values up to 1 day after the last dose date of randomized study drug.The change from baseline in CD4 cell count for the full analysis set was based on observed data (ie, Missing = Excluded) for the total and by the prior treatment regimen. (NCT01815736)
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 96
Intervention | cells/uL (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Baseline | Change at Week 96 | |
E/C/F/TAF | 701 | 60 |
Stay on Baseline Treatment Regimen (SBR) | 689 | 42 |
The analysis of CD4 cell count included values up to 1 day after the last dose date of randomized study drug.The change from baseline in CD4 cell count for the full analysis set was based on observed data (ie, Missing = Excluded) for the total and by the prior treatment regimen. (NCT01815736)
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 48
Intervention | cells/uL (Mean) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline (NDA Data Cut) | Change at Week 48 (NDA Data Cut) | Baseline (All Participants) | Change at Week 48 (All Participants) | |
E/C/F/TAF | 712 | 33 | 701 | 35 |
Stay on Baseline Treatment Regimen (SBR) | 690 | 27 | 689 | 24 |
(NCT01815736)
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 48
Intervention | mg/dL (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
NDA Data Cut | All Participants | |
E/C/F/TAF | -0.01 | 0.00 |
Stay on Baseline Treatment Regimen (SBR) | 0.04 | 0.03 |
"The mean (SD) change of the overall EFV-related symptom assessment score is presented. The overall symptom score (ranging from 0 to 20) is the sum of the individual symptom scores ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 4 (most severe symptoms) from the 5 EFV-related symptom assessments (dizziness, trouble sleeping, impaired concentration, sleepiness, and abnormal or vivid dream). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.~EFV-Related Symptom Analysis Set: participants who received EFV/FTC/TDF as prior treatment, received at least 1 dose of study drug, and completed EFV-related symptom assessments at the baseline visit and at least 1 postbaseline visit." (NCT01815736)
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 48
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
NDA Data Cut | All Participants | |
E/C/F/TAF | -1.6 | -1.5 |
Stay on Baseline Treatment Regimen (SBR) | -0.1 | -0.1 |
Hip BMD was assessed by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan. BMD is calculated as grams per square centimeter (g/cm^2); the mean (SD) percentage change is presented. (NCT01815736)
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 48
Intervention | percentage change (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
NDA Data Cut | All Participants | |
E/C/F/TAF | 1.949 | 1.468 |
Stay on Baseline Treatment Regimen (SBR) | -0.136 | -0.340 |
Spine BMD was assessed by DXA scan. BMD is calculated as g/cm^2; the mean (SD) percentage change is presented. (NCT01815736)
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 48
Intervention | percentage change (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
NDA Data Cut | All Participants | |
E/C/F/TAF | 1.861 | 1.557 |
Stay on Baseline Treatment Regimen (SBR) | -0.110 | -0.443 |
The percentage of participants achieving HIV-1 RNA < 20 copies/mL at Week 48 was analyzed using the snapshot algorithm, which defines a patient's virologic response status using only the viral load at the predefined time point within an allowed window of time, along with study drug discontinuation status. (NCT01815736)
Timeframe: Week 48
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | |
---|---|---|
NDA Data Cut | All Participants | |
E/C/F/TAF | 92.2 | 93.5 |
Stay on Baseline Treatment Regimen (SBR) | 90.4 | 90.4 |
The percentage of participants achieving HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week 48 was analyzed using the snapshot algorithm, which defines a patient's virologic response status using only the viral load at the predefined time point within an allowed window of time, along with study drug discontinuation status. (NCT01815736)
Timeframe: Week 48
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | |
---|---|---|
NDA Data Cut | All Participants | |
E/C/F/TAF | 95.6 | 97.2 |
Stay on Baseline Treatment Regimen (SBR) | 92.9 | 93.1 |
3 reviews available for alanine and Kidney Failure
Article | Year |
---|---|
Tenofovir alafenamide as compared to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in the management of chronic hepatitis B with recent trends in patient demographics.
Topics: Adenine; Age Factors; Alanine; Antiviral Agents; Bone Density; Clinical Decision-Making; Female; Glo | 2017 |
Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) treatment of HBV, what are the unanswered questions?
Topics: Adenine; Alanine; Antiviral Agents; Bone Density; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Hepatitis B, Chr | 2018 |
Renal safety of tenofovir alafenamide vs. tenofovir disoproxil fumarate: a pooled analysis of 26 clinical trials.
Topics: Adenine; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Alanine; Anti-HIV Agents; Child; Female; Humans | 2019 |
Renal safety of tenofovir alafenamide vs. tenofovir disoproxil fumarate: a pooled analysis of 26 clinical trials.
Topics: Adenine; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Alanine; Anti-HIV Agents; Child; Female; Humans | 2019 |
Renal safety of tenofovir alafenamide vs. tenofovir disoproxil fumarate: a pooled analysis of 26 clinical trials.
Topics: Adenine; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Alanine; Anti-HIV Agents; Child; Female; Humans | 2019 |
Renal safety of tenofovir alafenamide vs. tenofovir disoproxil fumarate: a pooled analysis of 26 clinical trials.
Topics: Adenine; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Alanine; Anti-HIV Agents; Child; Female; Humans | 2019 |
Renal safety of tenofovir alafenamide vs. tenofovir disoproxil fumarate: a pooled analysis of 26 clinical trials.
Topics: Adenine; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Alanine; Anti-HIV Agents; Child; Female; Humans | 2019 |
Renal safety of tenofovir alafenamide vs. tenofovir disoproxil fumarate: a pooled analysis of 26 clinical trials.
Topics: Adenine; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Alanine; Anti-HIV Agents; Child; Female; Humans | 2019 |
Renal safety of tenofovir alafenamide vs. tenofovir disoproxil fumarate: a pooled analysis of 26 clinical trials.
Topics: Adenine; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Alanine; Anti-HIV Agents; Child; Female; Humans | 2019 |
Renal safety of tenofovir alafenamide vs. tenofovir disoproxil fumarate: a pooled analysis of 26 clinical trials.
Topics: Adenine; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Alanine; Anti-HIV Agents; Child; Female; Humans | 2019 |
Renal safety of tenofovir alafenamide vs. tenofovir disoproxil fumarate: a pooled analysis of 26 clinical trials.
Topics: Adenine; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Alanine; Anti-HIV Agents; Child; Female; Humans | 2019 |
1 trial available for alanine and Kidney Failure
5 other studies available for alanine and Kidney Failure
Article | Year |
---|---|
Benincasa hispida extracts positively regulated high salt-induced hypertension in Dahl salt-sensitive rats: Impact on biochemical profile and metabolic patterns.
Topics: Alanine; Amino Acids; Animals; Antihypertensive Agents; Antioxidants; Aspartic Acid; Cucurbitaceae; | 2022 |
Comprehensive metabolomics profiling reveals common metabolic alterations underlying the four major non-communicable diseases in treated HIV infection.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Alanine; Aspartic Acid; Atherosclerosis; Cognitive Dysfunction; Female; Glu | 2021 |
Overdose of elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide in an HIV-1-infected subject with attempted suicide.
Topics: Adenine; Alanine; Anti-HIV Agents; Cobicistat; Drug Combinations; Drug Overdose; Emtricitabine; HIV | 2019 |
Population pharmacokinetic analysis of panipenem/betamipron in patients with various degrees of renal function.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Alanine; Area Under Curve; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Cre | 2006 |
Consequences of renal mass reduction on amino acid and biogenic amine levels in nephrectomized mice.
Topics: 3,4-Dihydroxyphenylacetic Acid; Alanine; Amino Acids; Animals; Biogenic Amines; Brain; Citrulline; D | 2000 |