adenine and Anemia

adenine has been researched along with Anemia in 35 studies

Anemia: A reduction in the number of circulating ERYTHROCYTES or in the quantity of HEMOGLOBIN.

Research

Studies (35)

Authors

Clinical Trials (9)

Trial Overview

Trial Outcomes

Death Event

All death events are due to AE, progressive disease, and other reasons. (NCT01109069)
Timeframe: 30 days after last dose of study drug

Number of Subjects With Adverse Events

Subjects were to receive ibrutinib once daily at the dose level the subject was receiving in the parent study until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The study included Screening, Treatment (from the first dose until study drug discontinuation), and Follow-up Phases. (NCT01109069)
Timeframe: 30 days after last dose of study drug, continue up to 6 months

Progressive Disease (PD)

A progressive disease confirmed by a CT scan. (NCT01109069)
Timeframe: 30 days after last dose of study drug, continue up to 6 months

Food Effect Cohort Assessments

Geometric mean ratio (Fed/Fasted) for PCI-32765 AUClast. The data were collected at 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 24 h post-dose. The AUClast was calculated from 0 up to 24 hours post-dose. (NCT01105247)
Timeframe: Fed was assessed on either Day 8 or Day 15 and Fasted was assessed on the remaining day as cross-over design.

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)

Number of participants who had experienced at least one treatment emergent AEs. (NCT01105247)
Timeframe: From first dose to within 30 days of last dose of PCI-32765

Percentage of Participants Achieving Response

Response criteria are as outlined in the IWCLL 2008 criteria (Hallek 2008) and as assessed by investigator, e.g. response requires 50% reduction in lymph node size. (NCT01105247)
Timeframe: The median follow-up time for all treated patients are 21 month, range (0.7 month, 29 months).

Progression Free Survival Rate at 24 Months

Criteria for progression are as outlined in the IWCLL 2008 criteria (Hallek 2008) and as assessed by investigator, e.g. progression defined as a 50% increase in lymph node size. (NCT01105247)
Timeframe: The median follow-up time for all treated patients are 21 month, range (0.7 month, 29 months).

OS (Overall Survival)

OS analysis was conducted at the time of study closure, with no adjustment for crossover from the ofatumumab arm to the ibrutinib arm (NCT01578707)
Timeframe: OS analysis was conducted at the time of study closure, including up to 6 years of study follow-up

Overall Response Rate (ORR) by Independent Review Committee (IRC)

Overall Response Rate per the IWCLL 2008 criteria as assessed by IRC, limited to the time of primary analysis 06 November 2013 (NCT01578707)
Timeframe: About 18 months after the first subject was enrolled

Overall Response Rate (ORR) by Investigator

Overall response per the IWCLL 2008 criteria as assessed by Investigator with up to 6 years of study follow-up (NCT01578707)
Timeframe: From study initiation to study closure, including up to 6 years of study follow-up

PFS (Progression Free Survival) by Independent Review Committee (IRC), Limited to the Time of Primary Analysis 06 November 2013

The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of ibrutinib compared to ofatumumab based on independent review committee (IRC) assessment of progression-free survival (PFS) according to 2008 IWCLL guidelines. (NCT01578707)
Timeframe: Analysis was conducted after observing approximately 117 PFS events, which occurred about 18 months after the first subject was enrolled.

Progression Free Survival (PFS) by Investigator With up to 6 Years of Study Follow-up

Long-Term Progression Free Survival as assessed by the investigator with up to 6 years of study follow-up (NCT01578707)
Timeframe: From study initiation to study closure, including up to 6 years of study follow-up

Rate of Sustained Hemoglobin and Platelet Improvement

Proportion of subjects with hemoglobin (HgB) increase >=20 g/L and platelet (PLT) increase >=50% over baseline continuously for >=56 days without blood transfusions or growth factors. (NCT01578707)
Timeframe: From study initiation to study closure, including up to 6 years of study follow-up

ORR (Overall Response Rate)

ORR is defined as the proportion of subjects who achieved complete response (CR), complete response with incomplete marrow recovery (CRi), nodule partial response (nPR) or PR per IRC assessment. Response criteria are as outlined in the International Workshop on CLL (iwCLL) 2008 criteria with the 2012 iwCLL modification stating that treatment-related lymphocytosis in the setting of improvement in other parameters was not considered as PD and the 2013 iwCLL clarification of criteria for a partial response to therapy. (NCT01722487)
Timeframe: Analysis was conducted when 15 months had elapsed after the last subject was randomized with the cutoff date of 4 May 2015. The median follow-up time is 18 month.

Overall Survival (OS)

OS is calculated for all randomized subjects as the duration of time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause or the date last known alive for subjects who were not known to have died at study closure. (NCT01722487)
Timeframe: Analysis was conducted when 15 months had elapsed after the last subject was randomized with the cutoff date of 4 May 2015. The median follow-up time is 18 month.

PFS (Progression Free Survival)

"The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of Ibrutinib compared with Chlorambucil based on the independent review committee (IRC) assessment of PFS~Progressive disease according to 2008 IWCLL guidelines was defined as:~Group A~Lymphadenopathy, increase ≥50%~Hepatomegaly, increase ≥50%~Splenomegaly, increase ≥50%~Blood lymphocytes, increase ≥ 50% over baseline~Group B~Platelets counts, decrease of ≥ 50% from baseline secondary to CLL~Hemoglobin, decrease of > 2 g/dL from baseline secondary to CLL" (NCT01722487)
Timeframe: Analysis was conducted when 15 months had elapsed after the last subject was randomized with the cutoff date of 4 May 2015. The median follow-up time is 18 month.

Proportion of Sustained Hemoglobin Improvement

The proportion of subjects who achieved Hemoglobin >11 g/dL or increase ≥ 2 g/dL over baseline and persisted continuously for ≥56 days (8 weeks) without blood transfusion or growth factors. (NCT01722487)
Timeframe: Analysis was conducted when 15 months had elapsed after the last subject was randomized with the cutoff date of 4 May 2015. The median follow-up time is 18 month.

Proportion of Sustained Hemoglobin Improvement in Subjects With Baseline Anemia

In randomized subjects with baseline hemoglobin ≤ 11 g/dL, the proportion of subjects who achieved Hemoglobin >11 g/dL or increase ≥ 2 g/dL over baseline persisted continuously for ≥56 days (8 weeks) without blood transfusion or growth factors. (NCT01722487)
Timeframe: Analysis was conducted when 15 months had elapsed after the last subject was randomized with the cutoff date of 4 May 2015. The median follow-up time is 18 month.

Proportion of Sustained Platelet Improvement

The proportion of subjects who achieved platelet >100 x 10^9/L or increase ≥50% over baseline and persisted continuously for ≥56 days (8 weeks) without blood transfusion or growth factors. (NCT01722487)
Timeframe: Analysis was conducted when 15 months had elapsed after the last subject was randomized with the cutoff date of 4 May 2015. The median follow-up time is 18 month.

Proportion of Sustained Platelet Improvement in Subjects With Baseline Thrombocytopenia

In randomized subjects with baseline platelet ≤ 100 x 10^9/L, the proportion of subjects who achieved platelet >100 x 10^9/L or increase ≥50% over baseline persisted continuously for ≥56 days (8 wee without blood transfusion or growth factors. (NCT01722487)
Timeframe: Analysis was conducted when 15 months had elapsed after the last subject was randomized with cutoff date of 4 May 2015. The median follow-up time is 18 month.

Change From Baseline in Beta2 Microglobulin at End of Treatment (EOT)

Change from baseline in beta2 microglobulin at end of treatment at time of primary analysis was reported. (NCT01611090)
Timeframe: Baseline to EOT (Up to 2 years)

Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 Physical Functioning Score at End of Treatment

"EORTC QLQ-C30 Physical Functioning Score is a questionnaire to assess quality of life of cancer patients. It is composed of 30 items, multi-item measure (28 items) and 2 single-item measures. For the multiple item measure, 4-point scale is used and the score for each item range from 1 = not at all to 4 = very much. Higher scores indicate worsening. The 2 single-item measure involves question about the overall health and overall quality of life which was rated on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 = very poor to 7 = excellent. Lower scores indicate worsening. All scale and item scores were linearly transformed to be in range from 0-100. A higher score represents a higher (better) level of functioning, or a higher (worse) level of symptoms." (NCT01611090)
Timeframe: Baseline to EOT (up to 2 years)

Change From Baseline in EuroQol-5 Dimension-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Utility Score Scale at End of Treatment

The EuroQol-5 is a five dimensional health state classification. Each dimension is assessed on a 3-point ordinal scale (1=no problems, 2=some problems, 3=extreme problems). The responses to the five EQ-5D dimensions were scored using a utility-weighted algorithm to derive an EQ-5D health status index score between 0 to 1. High score indicating a high level of utility. (NCT01611090)
Timeframe: Baseline to EOT (up to 2 years)

Change From Baseline in EuroQol-5 Dimension-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analog Scale at End of Treatment

The EQ-5D questionnaire is a brief, generic health-related quality of life assessment (HRQOL) that can also be used to incorporate participant preferences into health economic evaluations. The EQ-5D questionnaire assesses HRQOL in terms of degree of limitation on 5 health dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) and as overall health using a visual analog scale with response options ranging from 0 (worst imaginable health) to 100 (best imaginable health). (NCT01611090)
Timeframe: Baseline to EOT (up to 2 years)

Change From Baseline in FACIT-Fatigue Scale at End of Treatment

FACIT-Fatigue is an instrument for use as a measure of the effect of fatigue in patients with cancer and other chronic diseases. Responses to the 13-item FACIT Fatigue Scale are reported on a 5-point categorical response scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-Fatigue score for a total possible score of 0 (worst score) to 52 (best score). (NCT01611090)
Timeframe: Baseline to EOT (up to 2 years)

Median Time to Clinically Meaningful Improvement in FACIT-Fatigue Scale

Time to improvement is defined as the time interval (months) from randomization to the first observation of improvement. FACIT-Fatigue is an instrument for use as a measure of the effect of fatigue in patients with cancer and other chronic diseases. Responses to the 13-item FACIT Fatigue Scale are reported on a 5-point categorical response scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-Fatigue score for a total possible score of 0 (worst score) to 52 (best score). (NCT01611090)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

Number of Participants Who Received Subsequent Antineoplastic Therapy

Number of participants who received subsequent antineoplastic therapy was reported. (NCT01611090)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

Number of Participants With Clinically Relevant Shifts in Disease-Related Symptoms

The disease-related symptoms included fatigue, weight loss, fevers, night sweats, abdominal discomfort/splenomegaly and anorexia. (NCT01611090)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization to disease progression (Up to 2 years)

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

ORR defined as number of participants achieving a complete response (CR), complete response with incomplete marrow recovery (CRi), nodular partial response (nPR) or partial response (PR). IWCLL 2008 criteria: CR- No lymphadenopathy and hepatosplenomegaly, no constitutional symptoms, neutrophils >1.5*10^9/liter (L), platelets >100*10^9/L, Hgb >11 gram per deciliter (g/dL) and absolute lymphocyte count <4000/microliter (mcL); CRi- CR with incomplete recovery of bone marrow; nPR- participants meet criteria for CR, but the bone marrow biopsy shows B-lymphoid nodules, may represent a clonal infiltrate; PR-2 of the following when abnormal at baseline: >=50% decrease in ALC, >=50% decrease in sum products of up to 6 lymph nodes, >=50% decrease in enlargement of spleen or liver; and 1 of the following: neutrophils >1.5*10^9/L, Platelets >100*10^9/L and Hgb>11 g/dL or >=50% improvement over baseline in any of these; no new enlarged nodes or new hepatosplenomegaly. (NCT01611090)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the interval between the date of randomization and the date of death from any cause. (NCT01611090)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

Percentage of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)-Negative Response

MRD-negative response was defined as the percentage of participants who reach MRD negative disease status (less than 1 chronic lymphocytic leukemia [CLL] cell per 10,000 leukocytes) in either bone marrow or peripheral blood. All randomized participants were included in this analysis. Participants with missing MRD data were considered non-responders. (NCT01611090)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined as the interval between the date of randomization and the date of disease progression or death, whichever was first reported. IWCLL 2008 criteria for PD: New enlarged nodes >1.5 cm, new hepatomegaly or splenomegaly, or other new organ infiltrates, bone lesion, ascites, or pleural effusion confirmed due to chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL); >=50% increase in existing lymph nodes; >=50% increase in enlargement of liver or spleen; >=50% increase from baseline in lymphocyte count (and to >=5*10^9/L) or >=50% increase from nadir count confirmed on >=2 serial assessments if absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) >=30,000 per microliter and lymphocyte doubling time is rapid, unless considered treatment-related lymphocytosis; new cytopenia (Hemoglobin b [Hgb] or platelets) attributable to CLL; and transformation to a more aggressive histology. (NCT01611090)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-CLL 16 Domain Scores at End of Treatment

The EORTC QLQ-CLL 16 is a 16-item disease specific module that comprises 5 domains of patient-reported health status important in CLL. There are three multi-item scales that include fatigue (2 items), treatment side effects and disease symptoms (8 items), and infection (4 items), and 2 single-item scales on social activities and future health worries. Responses are measured on a 4 point scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much). (NCT01611090)
Timeframe: Baseline to EOT (up to 2 years)

Percentage of Participants With Sustained Hematologic Improvement

Sustained hematologic improvement was defined as hematological improvement that was sustained continuously for greater than or equal to (>=) 56 days without blood transfusion or growth factors: 1) Platelet counts greater than (>)100* 109/liter (L) if baseline less than or equal to (<=) 100*109/L or increase >= 50 percent (%) over baseline; 2) Hemoglobin >11 gram per deciliters (g/dL) if baseline <= 11 g/dL or increase >= 2 g/dL over baseline. (NCT01611090)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

DOR (Duration of Response)

The DOR analyses is performed on the subset of subjects that achieve CR or PR as determined by IRC. DOR is calculated as the duration of time from the date of first response to the date of progression or death due to any cause. (NCT01980628)
Timeframe: Analysis was conducted with the cutoff date of 02 Nov 2017, with a median follow-up time of 33.1 months.

ORR (Overall Response Rate)

"ORR is defined as the proportion of subjects who achieved complete response (CR), partial response (PR). Response criteria are as outlined in the International Working Group Criteria for NHL, Cheson (2007), with disease assessments performed by an independent review committee (IRC).~Per Cheson:~CR is defined as disappearance of all evidence of disease. PR is defined as regression of measurable disease and no new sites." (NCT01980628)
Timeframe: Analysis was conducted with the cutoff date of 02 Nov 2017, with a median follow-up time of 33.1 months.

Reviews

3 reviews available for adenine and Anemia

Trials

7 trials available for adenine and Anemia

Other Studies

25 other studies available for adenine and Anemia