Page last updated: 2024-10-31

activins and Dysmyelopoietic Syndromes

activins has been researched along with Dysmyelopoietic Syndromes in 4 studies

Activins: Activins are produced in the pituitary, gonads, and other tissues. By acting locally, they stimulate pituitary FSH secretion and have diverse effects on cell differentiation and embryonic development. Activins are glycoproteins that are hetero- or homodimers of INHIBIN-BETA SUBUNITS.

Research Excerpts

ExcerptRelevanceReference
"Myelodysplastic syndromes are characterised by ineffective erythropoiesis."2.84Luspatercept for the treatment of anaemia in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (PACE-MDS): a multicentre, open-label phase 2 dose-finding study with long-term extension study. ( Attie, KM; Chromik, J; Germing, U; Giagounidis, A; Götze, KS; Kiewe, P; Laadem, A; Mayer, K; Platzbecker, U; Radsak, M; Sherman, ML; Wolff, T; Zhang, X, 2017)

Research

Studies (4)

TimeframeStudies, this research(%)All Research%
pre-19900 (0.00)18.7374
1990's0 (0.00)18.2507
2000's0 (0.00)29.6817
2010's3 (75.00)24.3611
2020's1 (25.00)2.80

Authors

AuthorsStudies
Usuki, K1
Platzbecker, U3
Germing, U1
Götze, KS1
Kiewe, P1
Mayer, K1
Chromik, J1
Radsak, M1
Wolff, T1
Zhang, X1
Laadem, A1
Sherman, ML1
Attie, KM1
Giagounidis, A1
Fenaux, P1
Kiladjian, JJ1
Mies, A1
Hermine, O1

Clinical Trials (5)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
An Integrated European Platform to Conduct Translational Studies in Myelodysplastic Syndromes Based on the EuroBloodNet Infrastructure[NCT04174547]8,670 participants (Anticipated)Observational2019-09-30Recruiting
A 2-tiered, Phase 2, Rule-based, Intra-patient Dose Escalation Study to Investigate Safety and Feasibility of Vactosertib (TEW-7197) in the Treatment of Anemic Patients With Philadelphia Chromosome-negative MPNs (Ph-neg MPNs)[NCT04103645]Phase 237 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-11-22Recruiting
An Open-Label Extension Study to Evaluate the Long-Term Effects of ACE-536 for the Treatment of Anemia in Patients With Low or Intermediate-1 Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) Previously Enrolled in Study A536-03[NCT02268383]Phase 275 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-10-31Completed
A Phase 2, Open Label, Ascending Dose Study of ACE-536 for the Treatment of Anemia in Patients With Low or Intermediate-1 Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS)[NCT01749514]Phase 2116 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-31Completed
A Phase 3, Double-blind, Randomized Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Luspatercept (ACE-536) Versus Placebo for the Treatment of Anemia Due to the IPSS-R Very Low, Low, or Intermediate Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes in Subjects With Ring Siderob[NCT02631070]Phase 3229 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-02-09Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

Duration of Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) - Week 1 Through Week 24

Duration of RBC-TI was defined as the longest duration of response for participants who achieved RBC-TI of ≥ 8 weeks during the treatment period Week 1 through Week 24. Participants who maintained RBC-TI through the end of the treatment period were censored at the date of IP discontinuation or death, whichever occurred first. Median was estimated from unstratified Kaplan Meier method. (NCT02631070)
Timeframe: From start of study treatment to 16 weeks after last dose, up to approximately 93 weeks

InterventionWeeks (Median)
Luspatercept30.6
Placebo13.6

Duration of Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) - Week 1 Through Week 48

Duration of RBC-TI was defined as the longest duration of response for participants who achieved RBC-TI of ≥ 8 weeks during the treatment period Week 1 through Week 48. Participants who maintained RBC-TI through the end of the treatment period were censored at the date of IP discontinuation or death, whichever occurred first. Median was estimated from unstratified Kaplan Meier method. (NCT02631070)
Timeframe: From start of study treatment to 16 weeks after last dose, up to approximately 93 weeks

InterventionWeeks (Median)
Luspatercept30.6
Placebo18.6

Overall Survival

Overall Survival was defined as the time from the date of study drug randomization to death due to any cause. Overall survival was censored at the last date that the participant was known to be alive for participants who were alive at the time of analysis and for those who discontinued from the study or were lost to follow-up. (NCT02631070)
Timeframe: From randomization to study completion (up to approximately 57 months)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Luspatercept46.0
PlaceboNA

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) ≥ 12 Weeks From Week 1 to Week 24

RBC-TI Response was defined as the absence of any Red Blood Cells (RBC) transfusion during any consecutive 84-day (12-week) period (ie, Days 1 to 84, Days 2 to 85, Days 3 to 86, etc.) during the first 24 weeks of treatment. (NCT02631070)
Timeframe: From Week 1 through Week 24 of study treatment

InterventionPercent of Participants (Number)
Luspatercept28.10
Placebo7.89

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) ≥ 12 Weeks From Week 1 to Week 48

RBC-TI Response was defined as the absence of any Red Blood Cells (RBC) transfusion during any consecutive 84-day (12-week) period (ie, Days 1 to 84, Days 2 to 85, Days 3 to 86, etc.) during the first 48 weeks of treatment. (NCT02631070)
Timeframe: From Week 1 through Week 48 of study treatment

InterventionPercent of Participants (Number)
Luspatercept33.33
Placebo11.84

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) ≥ 8 Weeks From Week 1 Through Week 48

RBC-TI response was defined as the absence of any Red Blood Cells (RBC) transfusion during any consecutive 56-day (8-week) period (ie, Days 1 to 56, Days 2 to 57, Days 3 to 58, etc.) during Week 1 through Week 48. Participants had to have at least 56 days (≥ 8 weeks) of transfusion independence prior to (and including) the Week 48 cut-off date to qualify as a responder. Participants who failed to achieve RBC-TI at least 56 days prior to Week 48 were counted as non-responders. (NCT02631070)
Timeframe: From Week 1 through Week 48 of study treatment

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Luspatercept45.10
Placebo15.79

Percentage Of Participants Who Achieved Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) ≥ 8 Weeks From Week 1 to Week 24

RBC-TI response was defined as the absence of any Red Blood Cells (RBC) transfusion during any consecutive 56-day (8-week) period (ie, Days 1 to 56, Days 2 to 57, Days 3 to 58, etc.) during the first 24 weeks of study treatment. Participants had to have at least 56 days (≥ 8 weeks) of transfusion independence prior to (and including) the Week 24 cut-off date to qualify as a responder. Participants who failed to achieve RBC-TI at least 56 days prior to or on the cut-off date were counted as non-responders. (NCT02631070)
Timeframe: From Week 1 through Week 24 of study treatment

InterventionPercent of Participants (Number)
Luspatercept37.91
Placebo13.16

Percentage of Participants Who Progressed to Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

Percentage of participants progressing to AML throughout the course of the study (NCT02631070)
Timeframe: From randomization to study completion (up to approximately 57 months)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Luspatercept2.6
Placebo3.9

Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters: Bayesian Estimate of Apparent Clearance (CL/F)

Apparent total plasma clearance was calculated as Dose/Area Under the Curve to infinity (ꝏ). (NCT02631070)
Timeframe: Blood serum samples taken pre-dose at Cycle 1 Day 1 (C1, D1), C1 D8, C1 D15, C2 D1, C4 D1, C5 D8, C6 D1 and Week 25 visit, extension phase C4 D1 and Day 1 of every fourth treatment cycle thereafter.

InterventionL/day (Geometric Mean)
Luspatercept0.516

Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters: Bayesian Estimate of Apparent Volume of Distribution of the Central Compartment (V1/F)

Apparent volume of distribution of luspatercept was calculated according to the equation Vz = (CL)/λ. (NCT02631070)
Timeframe: Blood serum samples taken pre-dose at Cycle 1 Day 1 (C1, D1), C1 D8, C1 D15, C2 D1, C4 D1, C5 D8, C6 D1 and Week 25 visit, extension phase C4 D1 and Day 1 of every fourth treatment cycle thereafter.

InterventionL (Geometric Mean)
Luspatercept9.68

Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters: Bayesian Estimate of Elimination Half-life (t1/2)

Terminal phase half-life was calculated according to the following equation: t1/2 = 0.693/λz. (NCT02631070)
Timeframe: Blood serum samples taken pre-dose at Cycle 1 Day 1 (C1, D1), C1 D8, C1 D15, C2 D1, C4 D1, C5 D8, C6 D1 and Week 25 visit, extension phase C4 D1 and Day 1 of every fourth treatment cycle thereafter.

InterventionDay (Geometric Mean)
Luspatercept13.0

Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters: Bayesian Estimate of Maximum Concentration for the Area Under the Curve at Steady State for Starting Dose (AUC^ss)

Area under the curve steady state was defined as the area under the plasma concentration-time curve for a steady state. calculated by the linear trapezoidal rule. (NCT02631070)
Timeframe: Blood serum samples taken pre-dose at Cycle 1 Day 1 (C1, D1), C1 D8, C1 D15, C2 D1, C4 D1, C5 D8, C6 D1 and Week 25 visit, extension phase C4 D1 and Day 1 of every fourth treatment cycle thereafter.

Interventionday/μg/mL (Geometric Mean)
Luspatercept145

Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters: Bayesian Estimate of Maximum Concentration for the First Dose (Cmax)

Cmax was defined as the observed maximum plasma concentration, obtained directly from the observed concentration versus time. (NCT02631070)
Timeframe: Blood serum samples taken pre-dose at Cycle 1 Day 1 (C1, D1), C1 D8, C1 D15, C2 D1, C4 D1, C5 D8, C6 D1 and Week 25 visit, extension phase C4 D1 and Day 1 of every fourth treatment cycle thereafter.

Interventionμg/mL (Geometric Mean)
Luspatercept5.77

Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters: Bayesian Estimate of Maximum Concentration for the Starting Dose (Cmax) at Steady State

Cmax was defined as the observed maximum plasma concentration, obtained directly from the observed concentration at a steady state. (NCT02631070)
Timeframe: Blood serum samples taken pre-dose at Cycle 1 Day 1 (C1, D1), C1 D8, C1 D15, C2 D1, C4 D1, C5 D8, C6 D1 and Week 25 visit, extension phase C4 D1 and Day 1 of every fourth treatment cycle thereafter.

Interventionμg/mL (Geometric Mean)
Luspatercept9.17

Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters: Bayesian Estimate of Time to Reach Maximum Concentration (Tmax)

Tmax was defined as the observed time to maximum plasma concentration of luspatercept. (NCT02631070)
Timeframe: Blood serum samples taken pre-dose at Cycle 1 Day 1 (C1, D1), C1 D8, C1 D15, C2 D1, C4 D1, C5 D8, C6 D1 and Week 25 visit, extension phase C4 D1 and Day 1 of every fourth treatment cycle thereafter.

InterventionDay (Median)
Luspatercept5.40

Time to Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Progression

Time to AML progression was defined as the time between randomization date and the first diagnosis of AML as per World Health Organization (WHO) classification of ≥ 20% blasts in peripheral blood or bone marrow. Participants with a diagnosis of AML were considered to have had an event, participants who did not progress to AML at the time of analysis were censored at the last assessment date which did not indicate progression to AML. (NCT02631070)
Timeframe: From randomization to study completion (up to approximately 57 months)

InterventionMonths (Median)
LuspaterceptNA
PlaceboNA

Time to Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) - Week 1 Through Week 24

Time to RBC-TI was defined as the time between first dose date and the date of onset of RBC-TI first observed for participants who achieved RBC-TI of ≥ 8 weeks during Week 1 through Week 24 (NCT02631070)
Timeframe: From first dose to Week 24 of study treatment

InterventionDays (Mean)
Luspatercept17.2
Placebo26.0

Time to Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) - Week 1 Through Week 48

Time to RBC-TI was defined as the time between first dose date and the date of onset of RBC-TI first observed for participants who achieved RBC-TI of ≥ 8 weeks during Week 1 through Week 48 (NCT02631070)
Timeframe: From first dose to Week 48 of study treatment

InterventionDays (Mean)
Luspatercept40.3
Placebo57.2

Change From Baseline in Mean Daily Dose of Iron Chelation Therapy (ICT)

Mean change from baseline in mean daily dose of ICT averaged over Week 9 to Week 24 or Week 33 to Week 48. For each participant, the mean change in daily dose of ICT was calculated as the difference of postbaseline mean daily dose and baseline mean daily dose. (NCT02631070)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 9 through Week 24 and Week 33 through Week 48 of study treatment

,
Interventionmg/day (Least Squares Mean)
Weeks 9-24Weeks 33-48
Luspatercept10.0-148.8
Placebo51.0-123.8

Change From Baseline in Mean Serum Ferritin

Mean change from baseline in mean serum ferritin was calculated as the difference of postbaseline mean serum ferritin (averaged over the specified timepoints) and baseline mean serum ferritin. (NCT02631070)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 9 through Week 24 and Week 33 through Week 48

,
Interventionug/L (Least Squares Mean)
Weeks 9-24Weeks 33-48
Luspatercept-2.7-72.0
Placebo226.5247.4

Change From Baseline in RBC Units Transfused Over Fixed 16-Week Period

Mean change in total number of Red Blood Cells (RBC) units transfused over a fixed 16-week period (Week 9-24 or Week 33-48) from the total number of RBC units transfused in the 16 weeks immediately on or prior to first dose of study treatment. (NCT02631070)
Timeframe: At Baseline (16 weeks prior to first dose of study treatment) and Weeks 9 to 24 or Weeks 33 to 48

,
InterventionUnits (Mean)
Weeks 9 to 24Weeks 33 to 48
Luspatercept-3.0-4.9
Placebo0.4-3.9

Mean Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Quality of Life Score

"The EORTC questionnaire is a validated health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measure applicable to participants with any cancer diagnosis. Version 3.0 of the questionnaire was used in the study.~It is composed of 30 items that address 15 domains, including one global health status, functional domains, and symptom domains. Domain scores are transformed to a 0 to 100 scale, where higher scores on the global quality of life score indicate better function. As such, a positive change from Baseline score indicates an improvement in quality of life." (NCT02631070)
Timeframe: Baseline and Cycle 3, Day 1 (C3 D1), C5 D1, C7 D1, Week 25, every other cycle during extension phase (C1 D1, C3 D1, C5 D1, etc. up to C59 D1) and end of treatment. Each cycle is composed of 21 days.

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Cycle 3 Day 1 (C3 D1)C5 D1C7 D1Week 25Extension Phase C1 D1Extension Phase C3 D1Extension Phase C5 D1Extension Phase C7 D1Extension Phase C9 D1Extension Phase C11 D1Extension Phase C13 D1Extension Phase C15 D1Extension Phase C17 D1Extension Phase C19 D1Extension Phase C21 D1Extension Phase C23 D1Extension Phase C25 D1End of Treatment
Placebo0.12.2-0.60.26.3-3.90.63.811.94.88.34.213.9-16.74.216.716.7-0.8

Mean Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Quality of Life Score

"The EORTC questionnaire is a validated health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measure applicable to participants with any cancer diagnosis. Version 3.0 of the questionnaire was used in the study.~It is composed of 30 items that address 15 domains, including one global health status, functional domains, and symptom domains. Domain scores are transformed to a 0 to 100 scale, where higher scores on the global quality of life score indicate better function. As such, a positive change from Baseline score indicates an improvement in quality of life." (NCT02631070)
Timeframe: Baseline and Cycle 3, Day 1 (C3 D1), C5 D1, C7 D1, Week 25, every other cycle during extension phase (C1 D1, C3 D1, C5 D1, etc. up to C59 D1) and end of treatment. Each cycle is composed of 21 days.

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Cycle 3 Day 1 (C3 D1)C5 D1C7 D1Week 25Extension Phase C1 D1Extension Phase C3 D1Extension Phase C5 D1Extension Phase C7 D1Extension Phase C9 D1Extension Phase C11 D1Extension Phase C13 D1Extension Phase C15 D1Extension Phase C17 D1Extension Phase C19 D1Extension Phase C21 D1Extension Phase C23 D1Extension Phase C25 D1Extension Phase C27 D1Extension Phase C29 D1Extension Phase C31 D1Extension Phase C33 D1Extension Phase C35 D1Extension Phase C37 D1Extension Phase C39 D1Extension Phase C41 D1Extension Phase C43 D1Extension Phase C45 D1Extension Phase C47 D1Extension Phase C49 D1Extension Phase C51 D1Extension Phase C53 D1Extension Phase C55 D1Extension Phase C57 D1Extension Phase C59 D1End of Treatment
Luspatercept-4.1-2.4-2.1-1.80.02.00.8-0.5-2.4-1.8-2.63.1-0.6-1.63.10.9-2.02.52.1-0.3-1.53.60.50.36.64.8-2.21.4-3.88.312.52.812.516.7-9.2

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

"The outcome measure describes the number of participants who experienced different types of Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs).~TEAEs were defined as Adverse Events (AEs) that started on or after the day of the first dose and on or before 42 days after the last dose of IP.~The investigator determined the relationship of an AE to study drug based on the timing of the AE relative to drug administration and whether or not other drugs, therapeutic interventions, or underlying conditions could provide a sufficient explanation for the event. The severity of an AE was evaluated by the investigator according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) (Version 4.0) where Grade 1 = Mild, Grade 2 = Moderate, Grade 3 = Severe, Grade 4 = Life-threatening and Grade 5 = Death." (NCT02631070)
Timeframe: From date of first dose up to 42 days after the last dose (up to approximately 83 weeks)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
≥ 1 TEAE≥ 1 Suspected Related TEAE≥ 1 Serious TEAE≥ 1 Suspected Related Serious TEAE≥ 1 TEAE CTCAE Toxicity Grade (GR) 5≥ 1 Suspected Related TEAE With CTCAE GR 5≥ 1 TEAE with CTCAE GR 3 or 4≥ 1 Suspected Related TEAE With CTCAE GR 3 or 4≥ 1 TEAE Leading to Dose Interruption≥ 1 TEAE Leading to Dose Reduction≥ 1 TEAE Leading to Study Drug Discontinuation
Luspatercept1517166680861342922
Placebo702623040343406

Participants With Pre-Existing and/or Treatment-Emergent Antidrug Antibodies (ADA)

"Number of participants with positive ADA prior to taking study drug and/or during study. A participant was counted as treatment-emergent if there was a positive post-baseline sample while the baseline sample was ADA negative, or there was a positive post-baseline sample with a titer ≥ 4-fold of the baseline titer while the baseline sample was ADA positive. A participant was counted as preexisting if the baseline sample was ADA positive and the participant was not qualified for treatment-emergent." (NCT02631070)
Timeframe: From randomization to 1 year post first dose

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Pre-Existing ADATreatment Emergent ADATreatment Emergent Neutralizing ADA
Luspatercept7115
Placebo232

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Hematologic Improvement in Neutrophil Response (HI-N) Over Any Consecutive 56-day Period

Percentage of participants who achieved a hematologic improvement in neutrophil response (HI-N) per IWG criteria sustained over any consecutive 56-day (8-week) period, during the treatment period (Week 1 to Week 24 and Week 1 to Week 48) HI-N was defined as at least a 100% increase and an absolute increase > 0.5 X 10^9/L. (NCT02631070)
Timeframe: Week 1 through Week 24 or Week 1 Through Week 48 of study treatment

,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Week 1 Through Week 24Week 1 Through Week 48
Luspatercept13.320.0
Placebo010.0

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Hematologic Improvement in Platelet Response (HI-P) Over Any Consecutive 56-day Period

"Percentage of participants who achieved a hematologic improvement platelet response (HI-P) was defined as the percentage of participants meeting the HI-P criteria per the IWG sustained over any consecutive 56-day (8-week) period (Week 1 to Week 24 and Week 1 to Week 48) during the treatment period. HI - P reponse was defined as:~Absolute increase of ≥ 30 X 10^9/L in platelets for participants starting with > 20 X 10^9/L platelets~Increase in platelets from < 20 X 10^9/L to > 20 X 10^9/L and by at least 100%" (NCT02631070)
Timeframe: Week 1 through Week 24 or Week 1 Through Week 48 of study treatment

,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Week 1 Through Week 24Week 1 Through Week 48
Luspatercept50.062.5
Placebo33.333.3

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Mean Hemoglobin (Hgb) Increase of at Least 1.0 g/dL Over Any Consecutive 56-Day Period in Absence of Red Blood Cells (RBC) Transfusions

A mean hgb increase of ≥ 1.0 g/dL was analyzed as the percentage of participants with a hgb increase ≥ 1.0 g/dL compared with baseline (after applying the 14/3 day rule) that was sustained over any consecutive 56-day (8-week) period in the absence of RBC transfusions during the treatment period. (Week 1 through Week 24 and Week 1 through Week 48). (NCT02631070)
Timeframe: Week 1 though Week 24 and Week 1 through 48

,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Week 1 Through Week 24Week 1 Through Week 48
Luspatercept35.341.2
Placebo7.910.5

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Modified Hematologic Erythroid Response (mHI-E) Over Any Consecutive 56-Day Period

A modified HI-E response was defined as the percentage of participants meeting the modified HI-E per the International Working Group (IWG) sustained over 56-day consecutive period during the Treatment period. For participants with a baseline RBC transfusion burden of ≥ 4 units/8 weeks, a mHI-E was defined as a reduction in RBC transfusion of at least 4 units/8 weeks; for participants with baseline RBC transfusion burden of <4 units/8 weeks, mHI-E, was defined as a mean increase in hemoglobin of ≥ 1.5 g/dL for 8 weeks in the absence of RBC transfusions. (NCT02631070)
Timeframe: Week 1 through 24 or Week 1 Through Week 48

,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Week 1 Through Week 24Week 1 Through Week 48
Luspatercept52.958.8
Placebo11.817.1

Reviews

2 reviews available for activins and Dysmyelopoietic Syndromes

ArticleYear
Luspatercept for the treatment of anemia in myelodysplastic syndromes and primary myelofibrosis.
    Blood, 2019, 02-21, Volume: 133, Issue:8

    Topics: Activin Receptors, Type II; Activins; Anemia; Bone Morphogenetic Proteins; Disease-Free Survival; Er

2019
Activin Receptor II Ligand Traps and Their Therapeutic Potential in Myelodysplastic Syndromes with Ring Sideroblasts.
    Current hematologic malignancy reports, 2016, Volume: 11, Issue:6

    Topics: Activin Receptors, Type II; Activins; Humans; Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments; Iron Overload; Myelodyspl

2016

Trials

1 trial available for activins and Dysmyelopoietic Syndromes

ArticleYear
Luspatercept for the treatment of anaemia in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (PACE-MDS): a multicentre, open-label phase 2 dose-finding study with long-term extension study.
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2017, Volume: 18, Issue:10

    Topics: Activin Receptors, Type II; Activins; Adult; Aged; Anemia; Disease-Free Survival; Dose-Response Rela

2017
Luspatercept for the treatment of anaemia in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (PACE-MDS): a multicentre, open-label phase 2 dose-finding study with long-term extension study.
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2017, Volume: 18, Issue:10

    Topics: Activin Receptors, Type II; Activins; Adult; Aged; Anemia; Disease-Free Survival; Dose-Response Rela

2017
Luspatercept for the treatment of anaemia in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (PACE-MDS): a multicentre, open-label phase 2 dose-finding study with long-term extension study.
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2017, Volume: 18, Issue:10

    Topics: Activin Receptors, Type II; Activins; Adult; Aged; Anemia; Disease-Free Survival; Dose-Response Rela

2017
Luspatercept for the treatment of anaemia in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (PACE-MDS): a multicentre, open-label phase 2 dose-finding study with long-term extension study.
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2017, Volume: 18, Issue:10

    Topics: Activin Receptors, Type II; Activins; Adult; Aged; Anemia; Disease-Free Survival; Dose-Response Rela

2017
Luspatercept for the treatment of anaemia in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (PACE-MDS): a multicentre, open-label phase 2 dose-finding study with long-term extension study.
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2017, Volume: 18, Issue:10

    Topics: Activin Receptors, Type II; Activins; Adult; Aged; Anemia; Disease-Free Survival; Dose-Response Rela

2017
Luspatercept for the treatment of anaemia in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (PACE-MDS): a multicentre, open-label phase 2 dose-finding study with long-term extension study.
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2017, Volume: 18, Issue:10

    Topics: Activin Receptors, Type II; Activins; Adult; Aged; Anemia; Disease-Free Survival; Dose-Response Rela

2017
Luspatercept for the treatment of anaemia in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (PACE-MDS): a multicentre, open-label phase 2 dose-finding study with long-term extension study.
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2017, Volume: 18, Issue:10

    Topics: Activin Receptors, Type II; Activins; Adult; Aged; Anemia; Disease-Free Survival; Dose-Response Rela

2017
Luspatercept for the treatment of anaemia in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (PACE-MDS): a multicentre, open-label phase 2 dose-finding study with long-term extension study.
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2017, Volume: 18, Issue:10

    Topics: Activin Receptors, Type II; Activins; Adult; Aged; Anemia; Disease-Free Survival; Dose-Response Rela

2017
Luspatercept for the treatment of anaemia in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (PACE-MDS): a multicentre, open-label phase 2 dose-finding study with long-term extension study.
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2017, Volume: 18, Issue:10

    Topics: Activin Receptors, Type II; Activins; Adult; Aged; Anemia; Disease-Free Survival; Dose-Response Rela

2017
Luspatercept for the treatment of anaemia in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (PACE-MDS): a multicentre, open-label phase 2 dose-finding study with long-term extension study.
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2017, Volume: 18, Issue:10

    Topics: Activin Receptors, Type II; Activins; Adult; Aged; Anemia; Disease-Free Survival; Dose-Response Rela

2017
Luspatercept for the treatment of anaemia in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (PACE-MDS): a multicentre, open-label phase 2 dose-finding study with long-term extension study.
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2017, Volume: 18, Issue:10

    Topics: Activin Receptors, Type II; Activins; Adult; Aged; Anemia; Disease-Free Survival; Dose-Response Rela

2017
Luspatercept for the treatment of anaemia in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (PACE-MDS): a multicentre, open-label phase 2 dose-finding study with long-term extension study.
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2017, Volume: 18, Issue:10

    Topics: Activin Receptors, Type II; Activins; Adult; Aged; Anemia; Disease-Free Survival; Dose-Response Rela

2017
Luspatercept for the treatment of anaemia in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (PACE-MDS): a multicentre, open-label phase 2 dose-finding study with long-term extension study.
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2017, Volume: 18, Issue:10

    Topics: Activin Receptors, Type II; Activins; Adult; Aged; Anemia; Disease-Free Survival; Dose-Response Rela

2017
Luspatercept for the treatment of anaemia in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (PACE-MDS): a multicentre, open-label phase 2 dose-finding study with long-term extension study.
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2017, Volume: 18, Issue:10

    Topics: Activin Receptors, Type II; Activins; Adult; Aged; Anemia; Disease-Free Survival; Dose-Response Rela

2017
Luspatercept for the treatment of anaemia in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (PACE-MDS): a multicentre, open-label phase 2 dose-finding study with long-term extension study.
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2017, Volume: 18, Issue:10

    Topics: Activin Receptors, Type II; Activins; Adult; Aged; Anemia; Disease-Free Survival; Dose-Response Rela

2017
Luspatercept for the treatment of anaemia in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (PACE-MDS): a multicentre, open-label phase 2 dose-finding study with long-term extension study.
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2017, Volume: 18, Issue:10

    Topics: Activin Receptors, Type II; Activins; Adult; Aged; Anemia; Disease-Free Survival; Dose-Response Rela

2017

Other Studies

1 other study available for activins and Dysmyelopoietic Syndromes

ArticleYear
[New treatment for myelodysplastic syndromes: luspatercept and oral hypomethylating agents].
    [Rinsho ketsueki] The Japanese journal of clinical hematology, 2022, Volume: 63, Issue:9

    Topics: Activin Receptors, Type II; Activins; Azacitidine; Cytidine Deaminase; Decitabine; Humans; Immunoglo

2022