acrivastine has been researched along with Chronic-Disease* in 7 studies
7 trial(s) available for acrivastine and Chronic-Disease
Article | Year |
---|---|
Zafirlukast has no beneficial effects in the treatment of chronic urticaria.
Leukotriene receptor antagonists have shown some efficacy in t he treatment of asthma. Injection of LTC4, LTD4 and LTE4 into the skin leads to a weal-and-flare reaction, suggesting an involvement of leukotrienes in the pathogenesis of urticaria. Indeed, various reports have indicated a beneficial effect for leukotriene receptor antagonists in patients with chronic urticaria.. To determine the therapeutic effect of the leukotriene receptor antagonist zafirlukast in patients with chronic urticaria.. The study was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study lasting for 12 weeks. Fifty-two patients with chronic urticaria were investigated at a university hospital. The patients were randomized to receive 20 mg zafirlukast b.i.d. or placebo and cross-over was scheduled after 6 weeks. The efficacy of the treatment was evaluated by a daily symptom score, six physical examinations, the requirement of rescue antihistamines (acrivastine) and an overall assessment by the patient andthe investigating physician.. Forty-six patients completed the study: zafirlukast was well tolerated without alteration of the investigated laboratory parameters. In comparison with placebo, treatment with zafirlukast resulted in no significant positive effect for any of the efficacy measures. Moreover, we were unable to identify any subgroup of patients with chronic urticaria responding with a therapeutic benefit.. The leukotriene receptor antagonist zafirlukast does not provide a significant therapeutic benefit at a dose of 20 mg b.i.d. in patients with chronic urticaria. Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Chronic Disease; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Humans; Indoles; Leukotriene Antagonists; Male; Middle Aged; Phenylcarbamates; Sulfonamides; Tosyl Compounds; Treatment Outcome; Triprolidine; Urticaria | 2002 |
A comparison of acrivastine versus hydroxyzine and placebo in the treatment of chronic idiopathic urticaria.
A total of 21 patients with a diagnosis of chronic idiopathic urticaria were assessed in a fully randomized, double-blind, crossover study to investigate the efficacy of 8 mg acrivastine versus 20 mg hydroxyzine and placebo administered three times daily. Both acrivastine and hydroxyzine were found to be effective, and significantly better than placebo, in controlling signs and symptoms of urticaria. No significant differences were found between the active preparations. Hydroxyzine was associated with significantly more reports of drowsiness than was placebo. Topics: Adult; Chronic Disease; Clinical Trials as Topic; Double-Blind Method; Female; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Humans; Hydroxyzine; Male; Placebos; Pyridines; Triprolidine; Urticaria | 1989 |
A comparison of acrivastine versus terfenadine and placebo in the treatment of chronic idiopathic urticaria.
Patients (n = 56) with a diagnosis of chronic idiopathic urticaria were assessed in a fully randomized, double-blind, crossover study to investigate the efficacy of acrivastine at two doses (8 and 4 mg) versus 60 mg terfenadine and placebo administered three times daily. All three active preparations were found to be effective, and significantly better than placebo, in controlling the signs and symptoms of urticaria. No significant differences were found between the active preparations, although in some cases efficacy trends favoured 8 mg acrivastine and terfenadine over 4 mg acrivastine. No significant differences were noted between the active treatments and placebo with regard to reports of drowsiness. Topics: Adult; Benzhydryl Compounds; Chronic Disease; Clinical Trials as Topic; Double-Blind Method; Female; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Humans; Male; Placebos; Pyridines; Terfenadine; Triprolidine; Urticaria | 1989 |
A comparison of acrivastine versus clemastine and placebo in the treatment of patients with chronic idiopathic urticaria.
Twenty patients of mean age 41.3 years, with a diagnosis of chronic idiopathic urticaria were assessed in a fully randomized, double-blind, crossover study to investigate the efficacy of acrivastine at two doses (8 mg and 4 mg) versus 1 mg clemastine and placebo, given three times per day. All active preparations were found to be effective, and significantly better than placebo, in controlling the signs and symptoms of urticaria. There was a higher incidence of sedation with clemastine than with either acrivastine or placebo, although this difference did not achieve statistical significance in this small study. Topics: Adult; Chronic Disease; Clemastine; Clinical Trials as Topic; Double-Blind Method; Female; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Humans; Male; Placebos; Pyridines; Pyrrolidines; Random Allocation; Triprolidine; Urticaria | 1989 |
A comparison of acrivastine versus chlorpheniramine in the treatment of chronic idiopathic urticaria.
A total of 20 patients with a diagnosis of chronic idiopathic urticaria were entered into a fully randomized, double-blind, crossover study to investigate the efficacy of 8 mg acrivastine versus 4 mg chlorpheniramine three times daily. Data from 16 patients were available for analysis. Both acrivastine and chlorpheniramine were found to be effective in relieving the signs and symptoms of urticaria. There were no significant differences between the two treatments, although efficacy trends were generally in favour of acrivastine over chlorpheniramine throughout the study. Topics: Adult; Chlorpheniramine; Chronic Disease; Clinical Trials as Topic; Double-Blind Method; Female; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Humans; Male; Pyridines; Random Allocation; Triprolidine; Urticaria | 1989 |
Acrivastine versus clemastine in the treatment of chronic idiopathic urticaria. A double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Chronic Disease; Clemastine; Clinical Trials as Topic; Double-Blind Method; Female; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Pyrrolidines; Random Allocation; Triprolidine; Urticaria | 1987 |
An assessment of the novel antihistamine BW 825C in the treatment of chronic idiopathic urticaria. A placebo-controlled study.
20 patients with a diagnosis of chronic idiopathic urticaria were entered into a double-blind placebo-controlled cross-over study. All patients completed the trial and during the assessment period they were treated with placebo, BW 825C (4 mg) and BW 825C (8 mg) according to a fully randomised and balanced treatment plan. Both doses of BW 825C were found to be highly effective and significantly better than placebo in controlling signs and symptoms of urticaria. Few adverse reactions were reported and in this small group of patients there was no significant difference from placebo in reports of drowsiness or any other side-effects. Topics: Adult; Aged; Chronic Disease; Clinical Trials as Topic; Female; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Random Allocation; Sleep Stages; Triprolidine; Urticaria | 1984 |