aclidinium-bromide has been researched along with Cough* in 3 studies
2 trial(s) available for aclidinium-bromide and Cough
Article | Year |
---|---|
The Effect of Aclidinium on Symptoms Including Cough in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Phase 4, Double-Blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-Group Study.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Bronchodilator Agents; Cough; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Muscarinic Antagonists; Placebos; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Tropanes | 2019 |
Efficacy and safety of aclidinium bromide compared with placebo and tiotropium in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: results from a 6-week, randomized, controlled Phase IIIb study.
This randomized, double-blind, Phase IIIb study evaluated the 24-hour bronchodilatory efficacy of aclidinium bromide versus placebo and tiotropium in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).. Patients received aclidinium 400 μg twice daily (morning and evening), tiotropium 18 μg once daily (morning), or placebo for 6 weeks. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in forced expiratory volume in 1 second area under the curve for the 24-hour period post-morning dose (FEV1 AUC0-24) at week 6. Secondary and additional endpoints included FEV1 AUC12-24, COPD symptoms (EXAcerbations of chronic pulmonary disease Tool-Respiratory Symptoms [E-RS] total score and additional symptoms questionnaire), and safety.. Overall, 414 patients were randomized and treated (FEV1 1.63 L [55.8% predicted]). Compared with placebo, FEV1 AUC0-24 and FEV1 AUC12-24 were significantly increased from baseline with aclidinium (∆ = 150 mL and 160 mL, respectively; p < 0.0001) and tiotropium (∆ = 140 mL and 123 mL, respectively; p < 0.0001) at week 6. Significant improvements in E-RS total scores over 6 weeks were numerically greater with aclidinium (p < 0.0001) than tiotropium (p < 0.05) versus placebo. Only aclidinium significantly reduced the severity of early-morning cough, wheeze, shortness of breath, and phlegm, and of nighttime symptoms versus placebo (p < 0.05). Adverse-event (AE) incidence (28%) was similar between treatments. Few anticholinergic AEs (<1.5%) or serious AEs (<3%) occurred in any group.. Aclidinium provided significant 24-hour bronchodilation versus placebo from day 1 with comparable efficacy to tiotropium after 6 weeks. Improvements in COPD symptoms were consistently numerically greater with aclidinium versus tiotropium. Aclidinium was generally well tolerated. Topics: Aged; Area Under Curve; Bronchodilator Agents; Circadian Rhythm; Cough; Disease Progression; Double-Blind Method; Dry Powder Inhalers; Dyspnea; Female; Forced Expiratory Volume; Headache; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Muscarinic Antagonists; Patient Preference; Pharyngitis; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Respiratory Sounds; Scopolamine Derivatives; Surveys and Questionnaires; Time Factors; Tiotropium Bromide; Tropanes; Xerostomia | 2013 |
1 other study(ies) available for aclidinium-bromide and Cough
Article | Year |
---|---|
Downregulation of the cough reflex by aclidinium and tiotropium in awake and anesthetized rabbits.
Long-acting muscarinic receptor antagonists (LAMAs) have been reported to attenuate cough in preclinical and clinical studies. The present study was performed on rabbits to compare aclidinium and tiotropium efficacy in the downregulation of the cough reflex. This reflex was evoked by citric acid inhalation in unanesthetized animals and by both citric acid inhalation and mechanical stimulation of the tracheobronchial tree in anesthetized animals 90 min following the inhalation of each drug (nebulizer output always at 1 mL/min). Aclidinium 4 mg/mL and tiotropium 200 μg/mL inhaled in 1 min proved to have similar protective effect on methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction in anesthetized animals. The total dosage employed for aclidinium and tiotropium was 4 mg and 200 μg, respectively. In awake animals, similar reductions in the cough number were observed following 10-min inhalation of each drug with a slight, not significant tendency to higher antitussive effects for aclidinium. In anesthetized animals, 1-min inhalation of each drug caused similar depressant effects on cough responses induced by both mechanical and chemical stimulation. A complete suppression of cough responses to mechanical stimuli was seen in some preparations. The results strongly suggest that the LAMA-induced downregulation of cough may be mediated not only by transient receptor potential vanilloid type 1 channels, as already reported, but also by acid-sensing ion channels and mechanoreceptors. The route of administration along with the more rapid hydrolysis of aclidinium into inactive metabolites minimize potential systemic side effects and give to this drug a very favorable safety profile. Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Anesthesia; Animals; Antitussive Agents; Bronchoconstriction; Bronchodilator Agents; Cough; Delayed-Action Preparations; Disease Models, Animal; Male; Methacholine Chloride; Muscarinic Antagonists; Rabbits; Tiotropium Bromide; Tropanes; Wakefulness | 2016 |