abt-333 and HIV-Infections

AbbVie's 3 direct-acting antiviral (3D) regimen containing ombitasvir, paritaprevir, ritonavir, and dasabuvir with and without ribavirin is approved for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 infection. Safe and efficacious antiviral regimens resulting in minimal to no drug-drug interactions (DDIs) with antiretrovirals are needed to ensure that patients coinfected with HCV and the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) achieve 12-week sustained virologic response rates similar to HCV-monoinfected patients. Also, the prevalence of injection drug use history is high in both monoinfected and HIV/HCV-coinfected patients. This review summarizes results from phase 1 DDI studies of the 3D regimen and antiretrovirals or drugs to treat substance abuse. Data suggest the 3D regimen is a viable option for HIV/HCV-coinfected patients on antiretroviral therapy containing tenofovir/emtricitabine, abacavir/lamivudine, dolutegravir, raltegravir, or atazanavir. HCV-infected patients receiving medications for substance abuse, particularly methadone or buprenorphine/naloxone, can also be treated with the 3D regimen.

Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Anilides; Anti-Retroviral Agents; Carbamates; Coinfection; Cyclopropanes; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Hepatitis C; HIV Infections; Humans; Lactams, Macrocyclic; Macrocyclic Compounds; Proline; Protease Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Substance-Related Disorders; Sulfonamides; Uracil; Valine

A fixed-dose tablet comprising ombitasvir (an NS5A replication complex inhibitor), paritaprevir (an NS3/4A protease inhibitor) and ritonavir (a cytochrome P450 inhibitor) taken in combination with dasabuvir (an NS5B polymerase inhibitor) is indicated for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 infection in several countries, including the USA (copackaged as Viekira Pak(™)) and those of the EU (Viekirax(®) and Exviera(®)). In phase II and III trials, this interferon-free regimen, taken ± ribavirin, provided high rates of sustained virological response 12 weeks post-treatment in adults with chronic HCV genotype 1a or 1b infection, including those with compensated cirrhosis, liver transplants or HIV-1 co-infection. The regimen was generally well tolerated, with nausea, insomnia, asthenia, pruritus, other skin reactions and fatigue being among the most common tolerability issues. Thus, ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir plus dasabuvir is an effective interferon-free, direct-acting antiviral regimen for use ± ribavirin in a broad range of adults chronically infected with HCV genotype 1.

Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Carbamates; Cyclopropanes; Drug Resistance; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Genotype; Hepatitis C, Chronic; HIV Infections; Humans; Lactams, Macrocyclic; Liver Cirrhosis; Liver Transplantation; Macrocyclic Compounds; Proline; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Uracil; Valine

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) direct-acting antivirals are highly effective. Less is known about changes in markers of immune activation in persons with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in whom a sustained virologic response (SVR) is achieved.. We conducted a nonrandomized clinical trial of 12 or 24 weeks of paritaprevir-ritonavir-ombitasvir plus dasabuvir (PrOD) with or without ribavirin in persons with HCV-1/HIV coinfection suppressed with antiretroviral therapy. Plasma HCV, soluble CD14 (sCD14), interferon-inducible protein 10, soluble CD163 (sCD163), interleukin 6 (IL-6), interleukin 18, monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP-1), autotaxin (ATX), and Mac2-binding protein (Mac2BP) were measured over 48 weeks.. Participants were treated with PrOD for 12 (n = 9) or 24 (n = 36) weeks; the SVR rate at 12 weeks was 93%. At baseline, cirrhosis was associated with higher ATX and MCP-1, female sex with higher ATX and IL-6, older age with higher Mac2BP, higher body mass index with higher ATX, and HIV-1 protease inhibitor use with higher sCD14 levels. In those with SVR, interferon-inducible protein 10, ATX, and Mac2BP levels declined by week 2, interleukin 18 levels declined by the end of treatment, sCD14 levels did not change, and sCD163, MCP-1, and IL-6 levels changed at a single time point.. During HIV/HCV coinfection, plasma immune activation marker heterogeneity is in part attributable to age, sex, cirrhosis, body mass index, and/or type of antiretroviral therapy. HCV treatment with paritaprevir-ritonavir-ombitasvir plus dasabuvir is highly effective and is associated with variable rate and magnitude of decline in markers of immune activation.. NCT02194998.

Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Adult; Anilides; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiviral Agents; Biomarkers; Carbamates; Coinfection; Cyclopropanes; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Immunologic Factors; Lactams, Macrocyclic; Liver Cirrhosis; Male; Middle Aged; Proline; Ribavirin; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Sustained Virologic Response; Uracil; Valine

Background Data on the efficacy, safety, and concomitant use with other drugs of the combination ritonavir-boosted paritaprevir/ombitasvir plus dasabuvir (PrOD) in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients in real life are limited. The objectives of this study were to analyze these topics in HIV/HCV-coinfected subjects bearing HCV genotype 1 (GT1). Methods One hundred and eighty-two HIV/HCV-coinfected patients with GT1 (87 1a, 71 1b, 23 other) treated with PrOD, plus ribavirin (RBV) in 119 cases, in routine clinical practice were analyzed. The main variable of efficacy was sustained virological response (SVR) 12 weeks after completing therapy in an intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis and that of safety treatment discontinuation because of adverse effects. Factors associated with SVR were analyzed with a modified ITT (mITT) strategy. Results One hundred and seventy-two (94%) patients attained SVR, 3 (2%) experienced a relapse and two (1%) discontinued therapy due to adverse events. The rates of SVR in subjects with GT 1a and 1b by mITT were, respectively, 97% and 98%. Sixty-five (98%) out of 66 patients with cirrhosis and 107 (98%) out of 110 (p = 1) non-cirrhotics achieved SVR. Fifty-five (95%) patients on concomitant darunavir therapy developed SVR vs. 117 (99%) (p = 0.105) of those without DRV. RBV dose was reduced in 13 (11%) patients and permanently discontinued in 2 (2%), with no impact on SVR. Conclusions PrOD is highly effective and well tolerated in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients with GT1 in routine clinical practice. RBV is often required. However, RBV dose reduction or discontinuation is uncommonly needed and do not impair the SVR rate.

Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Carbamates; Cyclopropanes; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C; HIV Infections; Humans; Lactams, Macrocyclic; Macrocyclic Compounds; Male; Middle Aged; Proline; Ribavirin; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Uracil; Valine

Guidelines for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection consistently recommend initiation of antiretroviral therapy in patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV)/HIV-1 coinfection. Therefore, potential drug interactions between antiretroviral drugs and HCV direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) must be carefully considered. The objective of this investigation was to evaluate the compatibility of a novel combination of DAAs (the 3D regimen) with commonly prescribed HIV-1 protease inhibitors (PIs).. Five phase 1, multiple-dose, open-label pharmacokinetic studies were performed in 144 healthy volunteers. Participants in each study were randomly assigned 1:1 into cohorts assessing the effects of the steady-state 3D regimen on steady-state HIV-1 PIs or vice versa. The 3D regimen comprised ombitasvir (25 mg once daily), paritaprevir/ritonavir (150/100 mg once daily), and dasabuvir (250 or 400 mg twice daily). The HIV-1 PIs assessed included atazanavir, darunavir, and lopinavir (administered with ritonavir). Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic parameters were assessed to evaluate the compatibility of the drug regimens.. Coadministration of the 3D regimen with the evaluated HIV-1 PIs was generally well tolerated in healthy volunteers. Morning administration of atazanavir (300 mg once daily) and darunavir regimens exhibited no clinically meaningful drug interactions with the 3D regimen. However, owing to higher paritaprevir and/or ritonavir exposures, evening administration of atazanavir (300 mg) plus ritonavir (100 mg) or lopinavir/ritonavir (800/200 mg) with the 3D regimen is not recommended.. The 3D regimen can be coadministered with morning atazanavir and darunavir regimens. However, evening atazanavir plus ritonavir and lopinavir/ritonavir regimens are not recommended in combination with the 3D regimen.

Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Adolescent; Adult; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Carbamates; Coinfection; Cyclopropanes; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Healthy Volunteers; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C; Hepatitis C, Chronic; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lactams, Macrocyclic; Macrocyclic Compounds; Male; Middle Aged; Proline; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Uracil; Valine; Young Adult

The direct-acting antiviral regimen of 25 mg ombitasvir-150 mg paritaprevir-100 mg ritonavir once daily (QD) plus 250 mg dasabuvir twice daily (BID) is approved for the treatment of hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection, including patients coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus. This study was performed to evaluate the pharmacokinetic, safety, and tolerability effects of coadministering the regimen of 3 direct-acting antivirals with two antiretroviral therapies (dolutegravir or abacavir plus lamivudine). Healthy volunteers (n = 24) enrolled in this phase I, single-center, open-label, multiple-dose study received 50 mg dolutegravir QD for 7 days or 300 mg abacavir plus 300 mg lamivudine QD for 4 days, the 3-direct-acting-antiviral regimen for 14 days, followed by the 3-direct-acting-antiviral regimen with dolutegravir or abacavir plus lamivudine for 10 days. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated to compare combination therapy with 3-direct-acting-antiviral or antiretroviral therapy alone, and safety/tolerability were assessed throughout the study. Coadministration of the 3-direct-acting-antiviral regimen increased the geometric mean maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and the area under the curve (AUC) of dolutegravir by 22% (central value ratio [90% confidence intervals], 1.219 [1.153, 1.288]) and 38% (1.380 [1.295, 1.469]), respectively. Abacavir geometric mean Cmax and AUC values decreased by 13% (0.873 [0.777, 0.979]) and 6% (0.943 [0.901, 0.986]), while those for lamivudine decreased by 22% (0.778 [0.719, 0.842]) and 12% (0.876 [0.821, 0.934]). For the 3-direct-acting-antiviral regimen, geometric mean Cmax and AUC during coadministration were within 18% of measurements made during administration of the 3-direct-acting-antiviral regimen alone, although trough concentrations for paritaprevir were 34% (0.664 [0.585, 0.754]) and 27% (0.729 [0.627, 0.847]) lower with dolutegravir and abacavir-lamivudine, respectively. All study treatments were generally well tolerated, with no evidence of increased rates of adverse events during combination administration. These data indicate that the 3-direct-acting-antiviral regimen can be administered with dolutegravir or abacavir plus lamivudine without dose adjustment.

Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Adult; Anilides; Anti-HIV Agents; Anti-Retroviral Agents; Carbamates; Cyclopropanes; Dideoxynucleosides; Drug Combinations; Drug Interactions; Female; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; HIV Infections; Humans; Lactams, Macrocyclic; Lamivudine; Macrocyclic Compounds; Male; Middle Aged; Oxazines; Piperazines; Proline; Pyridones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Uracil; Valine

Limited data are available on the effectiveness and tolerability of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) therapies in the real world for HCV-infected patients with comorbidities. This study aimed to describe the effectiveness of OBV/PTV/r ± DSV (3D/2D regimen) with or without ribavirin (RBV) in HCV or HCV/HIV co-infected patients with GT1/GT4 and CKD (IIIb-V stages), including those under hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis in routine clinical practice in Spain in 2015.. Non-interventional, retrospective, multicenter data collection study in 31 Spanish sites. Socio-demographic, clinical variables, study treatment characteristics, effectiveness and tolerability data were collected from medical records.. Data from 135 patients with a mean age (SD) of 58.3 (11.4) years were analyzed: 92.6% GT1 (81.6% GT1b and 17.6% GT1a) and 7.4% GT4, 14 (10.4%) HIV/HCV co-infected, 19.0% with fibrosis F3 and 28.1% F4 by FibroScan®, 52.6% were previously treated with pegIFN and RBV. 11.1%, 14.8% and 74.1% of patients had CKD stage IIIb, IV and V respectively. 68.9% of patients were on hemodialysis; 8.9% on peritoneal dialysis and 38.5% had history of renal transplant. A total of 125 (96.2%) of 135 patients were treated with 3D, 10 (7.4%) with 2D and 30.4% received RBV. The overall intention-to-treat (ITT) sustained virologic response at week 12 (SVR12) was 92.6% (125/135) and the overall modified-ITT (mITT) SVR12 was 99.2% (125/126). The SVR12 rates (ITT) per sub-groups were: HCV mono-infected (91.7%), HCV/HIV co-infected (100%), GT1 (92.0%), GT4 (100%), CKD stage IIIb (86.7%), stage IV (95%) and stage V (93%). Among the 10 non-SVR there was only 1 virologic failure (0.7%); 4 patients had missing data due lost to follow up (3.0%) and 5 patients discontinued 3D/2D regimen (3.7%): 4 due to severe adverse events (including 3 deaths) and 1 patient´s decision.. These results have shown that 3D/2D regimens are effective and tolerable in patients with advanced CKD including those in dialysis with GT 1 or 4 chronic HCV mono-infection and HIV/HCV coinfection in a real-life cohort. The overall SVR12 rates were 92.6% (ITT) and 99.2% (mITT) without clinically relevant changes in eGFR until 12 weeks post-treatment. These results are consistent with those reported in clinical trials.

Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Aged; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Carbamates; Coinfection; Cyclopropanes; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lactams, Macrocyclic; Macrocyclic Compounds; Male; Middle Aged; Proline; Renal Dialysis; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Retrospective Studies; Ribavirin; Ritonavir; Spain; Sulfonamides; Sustained Virologic Response; Treatment Outcome; Uracil; Valine

We describe the effectiveness and safety of the interferon-free regimen ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir plus dasabuvir with or without ribavirin (OBV/PTV/r ± DSV ± RBV) in a nationwide representative sample of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) monoinfected and human immunodeficiency virus-1/hepatitis C virus (HIV/HCV) coinfected population in Spain.. Data were collected from patients infected with HCV genotypes 1 or 4, with or without HIV-1 coinfection, treated with OBV/PTV/r ± DSV ± RBV at 61 Spanish sites within the initial implementation year of the first government-driven "National HCV plan." Effectiveness was assessed by sustained virologic response at post-treatment week 12 (SVR12) and compared between monoinfected and coinfected patients using a non-inferiority margin of 5% and a 90% confidence interval (CI). Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics or patients and adverse events (AEs) were also recorded.. Overall, 2,408 patients were included in the intention-to-treat analysis: 386 (16%) were patients with HIV/HCV. Patient selection reflected the real distribution of patients treated in each participating region in Spain. From the total population, 96.6% (95% CI, 95.8-97.3%) achieved SVR12. Noninferiority of SVR12 in coinfected patients was met, with a difference between monoinfected and coinfected patients of -2.2% (90% CI, -4.5% - 0.2%). Only genotype 4 was associated with non-response to OBV/PTV/r ± DSV ± RBV treatment (p<0.001) in the multivariate analysis. Overall, 286 patients (11.9%) presented AEs potentially related to OBV/PTV/r ± DSV, whereas 347 (29.0%) presented AEs potentially related to ribavirin and 61 (5.1%) interrupted ribavirin.. Our results confirm that OBV/PTV/r ± DSV ± RBV is effective and generally well tolerated in a representative sample of the HCV monoinfected and HCV/HIV coinfected population in Spain within the experience of a national strategic plan to tackle HCV.

Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Carbamates; Cyclopropanes; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hepatitis C, Chronic; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lactams, Macrocyclic; Logistic Models; Macrocyclic Compounds; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Proline; Ribavirin; Spain; Sulfonamides; Sustained Virologic Response; Treatment Outcome; Uracil; Valine

Data on the treatment of patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV)/human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) coinfection remains limited. A comprehensive analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ombitasvir (OBV)/paritaprevir (PTV)/ritonavir(r) ± dasabuvir (DSV) ± ribavirin (RBV) for treatment in HCV/HIV coinfected patients.. We systematically searched and included studies that enrolled patients with HIV/HCV coinfection using the OBV/PTV/r ± DSV ± RBV regimens and reported sustained virological response after 12 weeks (SVR12) end-of-treatment. Heterogeneity of results was assessed and pooled SVR rates were computed with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). Subgroup analysis and assessment of publication bias through Egger's test were further performed.. Ten studies containing 1358 coinfected patients were included in this study. The pooled estimate of SVR12 was 96.3% (95%CI: 95.1-97.4). Subgroup analysis showed that pooled SVR12 rate was 96.2% (95% CI: 94.8-97.4) for patients with genotype (GT) 1 and 98.8% (95% CI: 95.1-100.0) for those with GT4. The SVR12 rates for the treatment-naïve (TN) and treatment-experienced (TE) patients were 96.8% (95% CI, 94.8-98.5) and 98.9% (95% CI, 96.4-100.0), respectively. Pooled SVR12 rate was 97.8(95%CI: 94.6-99.8) for patients with cirrhosis and 96.7% (95%CI: 95.3-97.8) without cirrhosis. The pooled incidence of any adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) was 73.9% (95%CI: 38.1-97.6) and 2.7% (95%CI: 0.0-9.5). Publication bias did not exist in this study.. The comprehensive analysis showed high efficacy for the OBV/PTV/r ± DSV ± RBV regimen in patients coinfected with HIV and HCV, regardless of genotypes, history of treatment and the presence or absence of cirrhosis.

Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Adult; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Carbamates; Clinical Trials as Topic; Coinfection; Cyclopropanes; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; HIV; HIV Infections; Humans; Lactams, Macrocyclic; Macrocyclic Compounds; Male; Middle Aged; Observational Studies as Topic; Proline; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Sustained Virologic Response; Uracil; Valine

Possible drug-drug interactions (DDIs) between antiretrovirals (ARVs) and direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) are of some concern.. To investigate ARV plasma trough concentrations (Ctrough) before and during DAAs in patients treated in the real world.. Single-centre, prospective, observational study including HIV/HCV coinfected persons undergoing DAA treatment. Self-reported adherence was assessed and ARVs Ctrough measured by HPLC-UV. Blood samples were collected before and after 2 months of DAA treatment.. One-hundred and thirty-seven patients were included: 21.2% treated with ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir ± dasabuvir (2D/3D) and 78.8% with sofosbuvir-based regimens. Suboptimal Ctrough before and during DAA was found, respectively, in 3 (10.3%) and 3 (10.3%) cases treated with 2D/3D, and 16 (14.8%) and 11 (10.2%) with sofosbuvir-based regimens, even if self-reported ARV adherence was always ≥93%. In 2D/3D-treated patients, median darunavir Ctrough during DAAs was significantly lower than observed before DAAs [1125 ng/mL (IQR, 810-1616) versus 1903 ng/mL (IQR 1387-3983), respectively] (n = 5; P = 0.009), with a 40.9% decrease. In the same group, no differences in atazanavir or raltegravir concentrations were found. In patients treated with sofosbuvir-based regimens, Ctrough of all ARVs were similar before and during DAAs.. In the real world of HIV/HCV coinfected patients, ARV plasma concentrations during DAAs were generally not different from those found before anti-HCV treatment. Although assessed in a small number of patients, darunavir concentrations during 2D/3D showed a significant reduction when compared with those found before DAAs. ARV plasma concentrations measurement during anti-HCV treatment may give useful information for managing HIV/HCV coinfected persons receiving treatment for both infections.

Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Anilides; Anti-Retroviral Agents; Carbamates; Coinfection; Cyclopropanes; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Hepatitis C, Chronic; HIV Infections; Humans; Lactams, Macrocyclic; Macrocyclic Compounds; Male; Middle Aged; Proline; Prospective Studies; Ritonavir; Sofosbuvir; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; Uracil; Valine

The renal function is a key-issue in HIV/HCV co-infected patients, nevertheless, it has not established so far whether HCV treatment with new direct acting agents could impact on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) variations. In the present work, we examined the real-life data on renal function that have been prospectively collected in the SIMIT compassionate-use program of ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir plus dasabuvir (OBV/PTV/r + DSV) in 144 HIV/HCV genotype 1 co-infected patients. The population was 74% male, 30.5% in CDC stage C, with median age of 52 years (48.0-56.5) and median liver stiffness of 7.8 kPa (6.7-9.2). Median baseline eGFR was 102.0 (90.8-108.1), changing to 99.8 (83.5-104.8) at the end of treatment (EoT), and 100.0 (87.3-105.6) 12 weeks after the EoT (FU12), p<0.0001. No patient had grade 3-4 increase of creatinine. At EoT 60/144 (41.7%) patients had ≥ 5% reduction in their eGFR, confirmed at FU12 in 39/60 (65.0%) cases. Longer duration of HCV infection (cut-off 12.9 years), lower HCV-RNA viral load (cut-off 1,970,160 IU/ml) and lower platelet count (cut-off 167,000 x106/L) were significantly associated with eGFR decline at logistic analysis (adjOR 2.9, 95%CI 1.0-8.8, p = 0.05; adjOR 3.5, 95%CI 1.2-10.4, p = 0.02; adjOR 2.8, 95%CI 1.1-6.8, p = 0.03, respectively). After repeating the analysis throughout a mixed model, a higher eGFR decline was highlighted in patients concomitantly treated with tenofovir (p = 0.0001), ribavirin (p = 0.0001), or integrase inhibitors (p <0.0001), with longer duration of HIV (p = 0.0002) and HCV infection (p = 0.035), lower baseline HCV RNA (p <0.0001), previous HCV treatment (p<0.0001), and older age (p<0.0001). In conclusion, our study confirms a good renal safety profile of OBV/PTV/r + DSV treatment in HIV/HCV patients, and the median decline of 2 ml/min in eGFR, albeit statistically significant, is of doubtful clinical significance. The role of aging, concomitant therapies and duration of HIV/HCV infection needs to be further investigated.

Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Antiviral Agents; Cyclopropanes; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Hepatitis C; HIV Infections; Humans; Lactams, Macrocyclic; Macrocyclic Compounds; Male; Middle Aged; Proline; Ribavirin; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Uracil

In registration studies, combination therapy of paritaprevir/ritonavir, ombitasvir, and dasabuvir (PrOD) with and without ribavirin for 12-24 weeks can achieve > 90% sustained virological response (SVR) for genotype 1 hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. However, data in Asia is scanty. We aimed to study the efficacy and safety of this combination therapy in chronic hepatitis C patients in Hong Kong.. We retrospectively analyzed data from six local hospitals that have prescribed PrOD with and without ribavirin to patients with genotype 1 chronic HCV infection as part of a global compassionate program.. Among 41 patients treated, 35 (85%) patients had genotype 1b HCV infection, 6 (15%) had co-infection with human immunodeficiency virus, 35 (85%) failed previous peginterferon and ribavirin therapy, 25 (61%) had compensated liver cirrhosis, and 3 (7%) had liver transplantation. Thirty-five (85%) patients received 12-week treatment and six patients received 24-week treatment; 26 (63%) patients received ribavirin combination. Thirty-nine (95%; 95% confidence interval 88.5-100%) patients had undetectable HCV RNA at 12-week post-treatment, that is, SVR. The two patients who did not develop SVR discontinued treatment prematurely; both of them were treatment experienced with liver cirrhosis complicated by acute renal failure unrelated to the treatment of PrOD and ribavirin. No patient had hepatic decompensation.. Paritaprevir/ritonavir, ombitasvir, and dasabuvir with or without ribavirin is effective and safe in patients with genotype 1 HCV infection in real-life clinical setting in Hong Kong.

Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Carbamates; Coinfection; Cyclopropanes; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; HIV Infections; Hong Kong; Lactams, Macrocyclic; Liver Cirrhosis; Liver Transplantation; Macrocyclic Compounds; Proline; Retrospective Studies; Ribavirin; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Uracil; Valine

Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Carbamates; Cyclopropanes; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Hepatitis C, Chronic; HIV Infections; Humans; Lactams, Macrocyclic; Liver Transplantation; Macrocyclic Compounds; Male; Middle Aged; Proline; Raltegravir Potassium; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Uracil; Valine

Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Carbamates; Coinfection; Cyclopropanes; Drug Therapy, Combination; Genotype; Graft Survival; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C; HIV Infections; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Lactams, Macrocyclic; Liver Transplantation; Macrocyclic Compounds; Male; Middle Aged; Proline; Recurrence; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; Uracil; Valine

The combination of ombitasvir, dasabuvir, and paritaprevir/ritonavir (considered as the 3D regimen) has proven to be associated with high sustained virologic response and optimal tolerability in hepatitis C virus-infected patients. Here, we describe an HIV-HCV-coinfected patient who experienced a grade 4 hyperbilirubinemia and a 2.5-fold increase in the atazanavir plasma trough concentrations few days after the start of 3D-based antiviral therapy who benefited from an atazanavir dose reduction guided by therapeutic drug monitoring.

Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; Carbamates; Coinfection; Cyclopropanes; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Interactions; Drug Monitoring; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hepatitis C; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Hyperbilirubinemia; Lactams, Macrocyclic; Macrocyclic Compounds; Middle Aged; Proline; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Uracil; Valine

Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Anilides; Carbamates; Coinfection; Cyclopropanes; Darunavir; Hepatitis C; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lactams, Macrocyclic; Macrocyclic Compounds; Proline; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Uracil; Valine

New treatments for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) are highly effective in patients coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). This study estimated the cost-effectiveness of treatments for genotype 1 (GT1) HCV in HIV-coinfected patients.. A Markov model based on HCV natural history was used. The base-case analysis included both treatment-naïve and -experienced patients. Alternatives were ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir, dasabuvir with or without ribavirin (3D ± R) for 12 or 24 weeks, sofosbuvir plus peginterferon and R (SOF + PR) for 12 weeks, SOF + R for 24 weeks, and no treatment (NT). A subgroup analysis restricted to treatment-naïve, non-cirrhotic patients compared 3D ± R for 12 weeks to SOF plus ledipasvir (LDV) for 12 weeks and NT. Transition probabilities, utilities, and costs were obtained from the published literature. Outcomes were measured over a lifetime horizon and included rates of compensated cirrhosis, decompensated cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma and liver-related death, total costs, life-years, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER).. In the base-case, SOF + R was dominated by both SOF + PR and 3D ± R. Compared to SOF + PR, 3D ± R had an ICER of $45,581. The lifetime rates of liver morbidity and mortality were lower among those treated with 3D ± R compared to SOF + PR, SOF + R, or NT. In the subgroup analysis, 3D ± R was cost-effective compared to NT at a threshold of $50,000 per QALY (ICER $27,496). SOF/LDV had an ICER of $104,489 per QALY gained compared to 3D ± R.. In the GT1 HCV population coinfected with HIV, 3D ± R was cost-effective compared to NT, SOF + R, and SOF + PR. In the treatment-naïve sub-population, 3D ± R was cost-effective compared to NT and SOF/LDV.

Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Adult; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Carbamates; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Cyclopropanes; Disease Progression; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; HIV Infections; Humans; Interferon-alpha; Lactams, Macrocyclic; Liver Cirrhosis; Liver Neoplasms; Macrocyclic Compounds; Markov Chains; Middle Aged; Polyethylene Glycols; Proline; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Recombinant Proteins; Ribavirin; Ritonavir; Sofosbuvir; Sulfonamides; United States; Uracil; Valine

The use of direct-acting antiviral (DAA) agents against chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections can result in the successful treatment of nearly all patients. Effective antiviral treatments can prevent the progression to cirrhosis and hepatocellular malignancy, and decrease liver-related morbidity and mortality.. Paritaprevir-ritonavir-ombitasvir and dasabuvir (PrOD), with or without ribavirin, is an all-oral regimen approved for the treatment of HCV genotype 1 infections, including patients with compensated cirrhosis. Phase 2 and 3 clinical trials demonstrated the safety and efficacy of this regimen in HCV genotype 1-infected patients who are treatment-naïve and those who have failed peginterferon/ribavirin therapy. Additional studies evaluated the use of PrOD with or without ribavirin among special populations, including patients co-infected with human immunodeficiency virus-1 and HCV, liver transplant recipients with HCV recurrence, and patients with severe renal impairment. Additionally, the combination of paritaprevir-ritonavir-ombitasvir plus ribavirin is found to be highly efficacious, and is now approved in the US, for the treatment of HCV genotype 4 infections.. The availability and use of interferon-free DAA combination regimens has resulted in a major paradigm shift in the treatment of HCV. PrOD, with or without ribavirin, is an effective, safe and tolerable treatment option.

Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Carbamates; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Coinfection; Cyclopropanes; Drug Therapy, Combination; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lactams, Macrocyclic; Liver Cirrhosis; Macrocyclic Compounds; Proline; Ribavirin; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Uracil; Valine