abacavir--lamivudine-drug-combination has been researched along with Fractures--Bone* in 3 studies
2 trial(s) available for abacavir--lamivudine-drug-combination and Fractures--Bone
Article | Year |
---|---|
Bone mineral density and fractures in antiretroviral-naive persons randomized to receive abacavir-lamivudine or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate-emtricitabine along with efavirenz or atazanavir-ritonavir: Aids Clinical Trials Group A5224s, a substudy of ACTG
Long-term effects of abacavir (ABC)-lamivudine (3TC), compared with tenofovir (TDF)-emtricitabine (FTC) with efavirenz (EFV) or atazanavir plus ritonavir (ATV/r), on bone mineral density (BMD) have not been analyzed.. A5224s was a substudy of A5202, in which HIV-infected treatment-naive participants were randomized and blinded to receive ABC-3TC or TDF-FTC with open-label EFV or ATV/r. Primary bone end points included Dual-emission X-ray absorbtiometry (DXA)-measured percent changes in spine and hip BMD at week 96. Primary analyses were intent-to-treat. Statistical tests used the factorial design and included linear regression, 2-sample t, log-rank, and Fisher's exact tests.. Two hundred sixty-nine persons randomized to 4 arms of ABC-3TC or TDF-FTC with EFV or ATV/r. At baseline, 85% were male, and 47% were white non-Hispanic; the median HIV-1 RNA load was 4.6 log(10) copies/mL, the median age was 38 years, the median weight was 76 kg, and the median CD4 cell count was 233 cells/μL. At week 96, the mean percentage changes from baseline in spine and hip BMD for ABC-3TC versus TDF-FTC were -1.3% and -3.3% (P = .004) and -2.6% and -4.0% (P = .024), respectively; and for EFV versus ATV/r were -1.7% and -3.1% (P = .035) and -3.1% and -3.4% (P = .61), respectively. Bone fracture was observed in 5.6% of participants. The probability of bone fractures and time to first fracture were not different across components.. Compared with ABC-3TC, TDF-FTC-treated participants had significantly greater decreases in spine and hip BMD, whereas ATV/r led to more significant losses in spine, but not hip, BMD than EFV. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT00118898. Topics: Absorptiometry, Photon; Adenine; Adult; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Atazanavir Sulfate; Benzoxazines; Bone Density; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Cyclopropanes; Deoxycytidine; Dideoxynucleosides; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy, Combination; Emtricitabine; Female; Fractures, Bone; HIV Infections; Humans; Intention to Treat Analysis; Lamivudine; Male; Middle Aged; Oligopeptides; Organophosphonates; Osteoporosis; Pyridines; Risk Factors; Ritonavir; Tenofovir; Viral Load | 2011 |
Abacavir-lamivudine versus tenofovir-emtricitabine for initial HIV-1 therapy.
The use of fixed-dose combination nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) with a nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor or a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor is recommended as initial therapy in patients with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection, but which NRTI combination has greater efficacy and safety is not known.. In a randomized, blinded equivalence study involving 1858 eligible patients, we compared four once-daily antiretroviral regimens as initial therapy for HIV-1 infection: abacavir-lamivudine or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (DF)-emtricitabine plus efavirenz or ritonavir-boosted atazanavir. The primary efficacy end point was the time from randomization to virologic failure (defined as a confirmed HIV-1 RNA level > or = 1000 copies per milliliter at or after 16 weeks and before 24 weeks, or > or = 200 copies per milliliter at or after 24 weeks).. A scheduled interim review by an independent data and safety monitoring board showed significant differences in virologic efficacy, according to the NRTI combination, among patients with screening HIV-1 RNA levels of 100,000 copies per milliliter or more. At a median follow-up of 60 weeks, among the 797 patients with screening HIV-1 RNA levels of 100,000 copies per milliliter or more, the time to virologic failure was significantly shorter in the abacavir-lamivudine group than in the tenofovir DF-emtricitabine group (hazard ratio, 2.33; 95% confidence interval, 1.46 to 3.72; P<0.001), with 57 virologic failures (14%) in the abacavir-lamivudine group versus 26 (7%) in the tenofovir DF-emtricitabine group. The time to the first adverse event was also shorter in the abacavir-lamivudine group (P<0.001). There was no significant difference between the study groups in the change from the baseline CD4 cell count at week 48.. In patients with screening HIV-1 RNA levels of 100,000 copies per milliliter or more, the times to virologic failure and the first adverse event were both significantly shorter in patients randomly assigned to abacavir-lamivudine than in those assigned to tenofovir DF-emtricitabine. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00118898.) Topics: Adenine; Adolescent; Adult; Analysis of Variance; Anti-HIV Agents; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Deoxycytidine; Dideoxynucleosides; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Drug Resistance, Viral; Emtricitabine; Female; Fractures, Bone; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lamivudine; Male; Middle Aged; Organophosphonates; RNA, Viral; Tenofovir; Therapeutic Equivalency; Time Factors; Treatment Failure; Viral Load; Young Adult | 2009 |
1 other study(ies) available for abacavir--lamivudine-drug-combination and Fractures--Bone
Article | Year |
---|---|
Changes in bone microarchitecture with abacavir--lamivudine versus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate--emtricitabine in adults living with HIV.
Topics: Absorptiometry, Photon; Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Dideoxynucleosides; Drug Combinations; Emtricitabine; Fractures, Bone; HIV Infections; Humans; Incidence; Lamivudine; Osteoporotic Fractures; Tenofovir | 2020 |