6-ketoprostaglandin-f1-alpha and Pruritus

The role of prostaglandins (PGs) on mechanical scratching-induced cutaneous barrier disruption in mice was investigated by comparing the observed effects of arachidonic acid (AA) application. Scratching of the mouse skin with a stainless-steel wire brush (mechanical scratching) was associated with significant, scratch-count-dependent elevation of the transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and skin PG levels (especially PGD(2) and PGE(2)). Histological evidence of inflammation (crusta, acanthosis and neutrophilic infiltration) in the skin also became evident 24 h after mechanical scratching. On the other hand, while topical application of 0.1% AA to the mouse skin also increased the skin PG levels, but did not produce any increase of TEWL or histological evidence of inflammation in the skin. Topical application of cyclooxygenase inhibitors (indomethacin, piroxicam, aspirin, diclofenac and ketoprofen) decreased the spontaneous recovery rates from cutaneous barrier disruption. These results suggest that the elevation of cutaneous PG production induced by mechanical scratching is involved in the repair of the skin damage caused by the scratching.

Topics: 6-Ketoprostaglandin F1 alpha; Animals; Arachidonic Acid; Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors; Dinoprost; Dinoprostone; Epoprostenol; Male; Mice; Mice, Inbred BALB C; Permeability; Physical Stimulation; Prostaglandin D2; Prostaglandins; Pruritus; Recovery of Function; Skin; Water

The role of prostaglandins in mechanical scratching-induced cutaneous barrier disruption in mice was investigated. Skin prostaglandins contents were measured after cutaneous barrier function was disrupted by scratching using a stainless-steal wire brush (mechanical scratching), then effects of prostanoids on recovery of cutaneous barrier functions were examined. This mechanical scratching increased transepidermal water loss and skin prostaglandins (prostaglandin D2, prostaglandin E2, 6-keto-prostaglandin F1alpha and prostaglandin F2alpha) contents, count-dependently. Topical application of indomethacin immediately after cutaneous barrier disruption delayed the recovery period of cutaneous barrier disruption. We examined effects of several prostanoids (prostaglandin D2, prostaglandin E2, prostaglandin F2alpha, prostaglandin I2 and U46619) on delay of the recovery process of mechanical scratching-induced cutaneous barrier disruption with treatment of indomethacin. Topically applied prostaglandin D2 and prostaglandin E2 accelerated the recovery of cutaneous barrier disruption and topical application of prostaglandin J2, limaprost, sulprostone and ONO-4819, but not 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-prostaglandin D2, 15-deoxy-Delta(12,14)-prostaglandin J2, 17-phenyl-trinor-prostaglandin E2 or butaprost had effects on recovery of the cutaneous barrier. These results suggest that prostaglandin D2 and prostaglandin E2 accelerate the recovery process of cutaneous barrier disruption caused by mechanical scratching, via specific prostanoid DP1, EP3 and EP4 receptors.

Topics: 6-Ketoprostaglandin F1 alpha; Alprostadil; Animals; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Dinoprost; Dinoprostone; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Heptanoates; Indomethacin; Male; Mice; Mice, Inbred BALB C; Prostaglandin D2; Pruritus; Receptors, Prostaglandin E; Receptors, Prostaglandin E, EP4 Subtype; Skin; Stress, Mechanical; Time Factors; Water Loss, Insensible

NC/Nga mice have similar pathological and behavioral features of human atopic dermatitis and are used as a model of the disease. Under conventional circumstances, spontaneous and persistent scratching is frequent and can lead to the onset of skin inflammation. We examined the effects of several prostanoids and their related compounds on the scratching behavior of NC/Nga mice. Among them, topically applied prostaglandin D2, prostaglandin E1, prostaglandin E2 and prostaglandin I2 significantly suppressed the scratching, the order of inhibitory activities being prostaglandin D2>>prostaglandin I2>prostaglandin E1=prostaglandin E2. Prostaglandin D2 metabolite, prostaglandin J2 also significantly suppressed the scratching but not so 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-prostaglandin D2, and 15-deoxy-Delta12,14-prostaglandin J2. The order of the inhibitory activities of these prostaglandin D2 metabolites depended on affinity of the prostanoid DP1 receptor but not on the DP2 receptor (chemoattractant receptor-homologous molecule expressed on T helper2 cells, CRTH2) and PPAR-gamma receptors. Likewise, topically applied arachidonic acid significantly suppressed the scratching while indomethacin enhanced it. Pretreatment of arachidonic acid increased the skin prostaglandins (prostaglandin D2, prostaglandin E2, prostaglandin F2alpha and 6-keto-prostaglandin F1alpha) contents, but indomethacin decreased the prostaglandin D2 and prostaglandin E2 contents. On the other hand, prostaglandin D2 and indomethacin had no apparent effects on histamine-induced scratching of ICR mice. These results suggested that prostaglandin D2 plays a physiological role in inhibiting pruritus of NC/Nga mice via their specific prostanoid DP1 receptors, and that prostaglandin D2 and/or a prostanoid DP1 receptor agonist may have therapeutic effects for cases of consecutive skin inflammation.

Topics: 6-Ketoprostaglandin F1 alpha; Alprostadil; Animals; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Arachidonic Acid; Behavior, Animal; Dermatitis, Atopic; Dinoprost; Dinoprostone; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Epoprostenol; Histamine; Indomethacin; Male; Mice; Mice, Inbred ICR; Mice, Inbred Strains; Prostaglandin D2; Prostaglandins; Pruritus; Receptors, Prostaglandin; Skin; Time Factors