4-acetamido-4--isothiocyanatostilbene-2-2--disulfonic-acid and Barrett-Esophagus

Barrett's specialized columnar epithelium (SCE) replaces reflux-damaged squamous epithelium. The benefits of SCE lie in its superior protection of the esophagus against further reflux damage. It was shown that this protection is dependent on ion transport and barrier function of SCE. The risks of SCE lie in its higher predisposition to malignant transformation. An understanding of underlying mechanisms of both processes would benefit considerably from greater knowledge of the structure and function of native SCE - the latter recently advanced by the availability of a telomerase-immortalized, nonneoplastic, human Barrett's cell line (BAR-T). Some of BAR-T characteristics for growth and differentiation have been described recently, but not its capacity to serve as a model for ion transport and barrier function of SCE. To determine the latter, BAR-T cells were grown in enriched media, seeded on permeable supports, and subjected to electrical, biochemical, and morphologic study. HET-1A (esophageal epithelial cell line), a nonneoplastic, human esophageal squamous cell line, was also studied for comparison. BAR-T, but not HET-1A cells in HEPES Ringer solution behaved as polarized monolayers with the capacity for ion transport and barrier function. This was evident electrically with a volt-ohm meter (EVOM),which recorded in BAR-T a resting potential difference of 2.0 +/- 0.2 mV, Isc of 17.4 +/- 3.3 microAmps/cm2 and resistance of 103 +/- 12 ohms x cm2. Further, Isc in BAR-T was inhibitable by exposure to Na-free solution, serosal ouabain, and luminal 4-acetamido4'-isothiocyano-2,2'-stilbenedisulfonic acid. Expression of tight junction genes were determined in BAR-T and HET-1A cells using quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction, with expression of zonula occludens-1 (ZO-1) set at 1 as reference. Claudins 1, 4, and 12 were prominently expressed in BAR-T (0.2-0.6 of ZO-1), while claudins 1, 11, and 12 were prominently expressed in HET-1A(0.1-0.8 of ZO-1). BAR-T, but not HET-1A, expressed claudins 4, 8, 16, 18, and 23, and HET-1A, but not BAR-T, expressed claudins 11, 15, and 20. Protein expression of prominently expressed claudins in BAR-T correlated with mRNA expression. Immunofluorescence and confocal microscopy localized claudins 1 and 4 in BAR-T to cell membranes and claudin 18, specifically to the tight junction. Membrane polarization was also documented in BAR-T by immunolocalization of NaK,ATPase to the basolateral membrane. BAR-T, but n

Topics: 4-Acetamido-4'-isothiocyanatostilbene-2,2'-disulfonic Acid; Autoantigens; Barrett Esophagus; Buffers; Cell Culture Techniques; Cell Differentiation; Cell Line; Cell Proliferation; Claudin-1; Claudin-4; Claudins; Culture Media; Electric Conductivity; Electric Impedance; Enzyme Inhibitors; Epithelial Cells; HEPES; Humans; Ion Transport; Membrane Potentials; Membrane Proteins; Nerve Tissue Proteins; Ouabain; Phosphoproteins; Sodium-Potassium-Exchanging ATPase; Tight Junctions; Zonula Occludens-1 Protein

The human esophagus is lined by stratified squamous epithelium (ESSE), and in some subjects with reflux disease the distal esophagus becomes lined by Barrett's specialized columnar epithelium (BSCE). ESSE and BSCE differ both histologically and functionally, the latter evident by differences in their in vivo transmural electrical potential difference (PD), ESSE averaging -15 mV and BSCE being greater than -25 mV. In this report we examine the basis for this difference in PD. This is done by mounting endoscopic biopsies of ESSE from 25 subjects without esophageal disease and BSCE from 19 with Barrett's esophagus in mini-Ussing chambers for electrical recordings basally and after bathing solution ion replacement. The results show that the PD of human ESSE reflects a low level of active ion transport (5.1 +/- 0.8 muA/cm(2)) combined with a high level of tissue (electrical) resistance (344 +/- 34 Omega.cm(2)) and that of BSCE reflects a high level of active transport (43.6 +/- 11.6 muA/cm(2)) combined with a low level of resistance (69 +/- 8 Omega.cm(2)). Furthermore, active transport in ESSE was principally due to sodium absorption whereas in BSCE it was equally divided between sodium absorption and anion (chloride/bicarbonate) secretion, the latter through an apical membrane, 4-acetamido4'-isothiocyano-2,2'-stilbenedisulfonic acid-sensitive anion channel. As an anion-secreting tissue with bicarbonate secretory capacity more than fivefold greater than ESSE, BSCE is better suited than ESSE for defense of the esophagus against reflux disease.

Topics: 4-Acetamido-4'-isothiocyanatostilbene-2,2'-disulfonic Acid; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Barrett Esophagus; Biological Transport, Active; Electrophysiology; Esophagoscopy; Esophagus; Ethoxzolamide; Humans; In Vitro Techniques; Middle Aged