3-(2-hydroxy-4-(1-1-dimethylheptyl)phenyl)-4-(3-hydroxypropyl)cyclohexanol and Neuroblastoma

The CB(1) cannabinoid receptor shows complex interactions with intracellular signalling partners, and responses to cannabinoid ligands are likely to be influenced by concomitant inputs modifying the overall tone of signalling cascades. This appears even more relevant as we previously evidenced opposite regulations of tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) expression by the two common cannabinoid agonists HU 210 and CP 55,940. Therefore, we studied the consequences of manipulating adenylyl cyclase activity with forskolin on the regulation of TH gene transcription in neuroblastoma cells (N1E-115). Reporter gene experiments performed with the luciferase sequence cloned under the control of modified fragments of the TH gene promoter revealed that the AP-1 consensus sequence is essential for cannabinoid-mediated regulation of TH expression. Consistently, inhibition of PKC totally blocked the responses mediated by both HU 210 and CP 55,940. In addition, forskolin which boosts adenylyl cyclase activity remarkably modified the responses to the cannabinoid agonists. Thus, in these conditions, both agonists efficiently reduced TH gene promoter activity, a response requiring functional PKA/CRE-dependent signallings. Finally, the modulations of the promoter were inhibited in pertussis toxin treated cells, suggesting that responses to both agonists are mediated through G(i/o)-dependent mechanisms. Emphasising on the importance of functional selectivity at GPCRs, these data demonstrate that the concomitant activation of adenylyl cyclase by forskolin strongly influences the biochemical responses triggered by distinct cannabinoid agonists. Together our results suggest that the physiological modulation of TH expression by cannabinoid agonists in dopaminergic neurons would be influenced by additional endogenous inputs.

Topics: Adenylyl Cyclases; Animals; Cannabinoid Receptor Modulators; Cannabinoids; Cell Line, Tumor; Colforsin; Cyclohexanols; DNA Primers; Dronabinol; Enzyme Activation; Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists; Genes, Reporter; Luciferases; Mice; Neuroblastoma; Pertussis Toxin; Polymerase Chain Reaction; Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB1; Tetradecanoylphorbol Acetate; Transcription, Genetic; Transfection; Tyrosine 3-Monooxygenase

In the present study we investigated the signal transduction pathways leading to the activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) by opioid or cannabinoid drugs, when their receptors are coexpressed in the same cell-type. In N18TG2 neuroblastoma cells, the opioid agonist etorphine and the cannabinoid agonist CP-55940 induced the phosphorylation of ERK by a similar mechanism that involved activation of delta-opioid receptors or CB1 cannabinoid receptors coupled to Gi/Go proteins, matrix metalloproteases, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptors and MAPK/ERK kinase (MEK). In HEK-293 cells, these two drugs induced the phosphorylation of ERK by separate mechanisms. While CP-55940 activated ERK by transactivation of VEGFRs, similar to its effect in N18TG2 cells, the opioid agonist etorphine activated ERK by a mechanism that did not involve transactivation of a receptor tyrosine kinase. Interestingly, the activation of ERK by etorphine was resistant to the inhibition of MEK, suggesting the possible existence of a novel, undescribed yet mechanism for the activation of ERK by opioids. This mechanism was found to be specific to etorphine, as activation of ERK by the micro-opioid receptor (MOR) agonist DAMGO ([D-Ala(2), N-Me-Phe(4), Gly(5)-ol] enkephalin) was mediated by MEK in these cells, suggesting that etorphine and DAMGO activate distinct, ligand-specific, conformations of MOR. The characterization of cannabinoid- and opioid-induced ERK activation in these two cell-lines enables future studies into possible interactions between these two groups of drugs at the level of MAPK signaling.

Topics: Analgesics; Analgesics, Opioid; Animals; Cell Line; Cell Line, Tumor; Central Nervous System; Cyclohexanols; Enkephalin, Ala(2)-MePhe(4)-Gly(5)-; Enzyme Activation; Etorphine; Extracellular Signal-Regulated MAP Kinases; Humans; MAP Kinase Kinase 1; Mice; Neuroblastoma; Neurons; Rats; Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB1; Receptors, Cannabinoid; Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled; Receptors, Opioid; Receptors, Opioid, delta; Receptors, Opioid, mu; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-1

Functional interactions between catecholamines and cannabinoid transmission systems could explain the influence of Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol on several central activities. Hence, the presence of cannabinoid CB(1) receptors in tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) containing cells has been suggested, providing clue for a direct control of catecholamines synthesis. In the present study, we evidenced the constitutive expression of functional cannabinoid CB(1) receptors in N1E-115 neuroblastoma and reported on the use of this model to examine the influence of diverse cannabinoid ligands on TH expression. Exposure of the cells to the high-affinity agonist HU 210 (5 h) resulted in a significant decrease in TH content (pEC(50): 6.40). In contrast, no change was observed after a similar treatment with the structurally unrelated agonist CP 55,940. Besides, the use of a luciferase reporter assay revealed that these two agonists showed opposite influences on TH gene promoter activity. Thus, in cells expressing pTH-luc constructs, inhibition and induction of luciferase activity were respectively observed with HU 210 (pEC(50): 8.95) and CP 55,940 (pEC(50): 9.09). Pharmacological characterisation revealed that these reciprocal responses were both related to the specific activation of cannabinoid CB(1) receptor, suggesting an agonist-dependent modulation of distinct signalling pathways. While these data points out the possible pharmacological manipulation of TH expression by cannabinoid ligands, such approach should take into account the existence of agonist selective trafficking of cannabinoid CB(1) receptor signalling.

Topics: Animals; Cannabinoid Receptor Modulators; Cannabinoids; Catecholamines; Cell Line, Tumor; CHO Cells; Cricetinae; Cricetulus; Cyclohexanols; Dronabinol; Gene Expression Regulation, Enzymologic; Ligands; Mice; Models, Biological; Neuroblastoma; Neurons; Neuroprotective Agents; Promoter Regions, Genetic; Protein Transport; Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB1; Signal Transduction; Tyrosine 3-Monooxygenase

1. Aminoalkylindoles, typified by WIN 55212-2, bind to G protein-coupled cannabinoid receptors in brain. Although cannabinoids inhibit adenylyl cyclase in NG108-15 neuroblastoma x glioma hybrid cells, cannabinoid receptor binding in these cells has not been described previously. This study compares pharmacological characteristics of [3H]WIN 55212-2 binding sites in rat cerebellar membranes and in NG108-15 membranes. 2. Although the KD of specified [3H]WIN 55212-2 binding was similar in brain and NG108-15 membranes, the Bmax was 10 times lower in NG108-15 than in cerebellar membranes. In both brain and NG108-15 membranes, aminoalkylindole analogues were relatively potent in displacing [3H]WIN 55212-2 binding. However, IC50 values for more traditional cannabinoids were significantly higher in NG108-15 membranes than in brain, e.g., the Ki values for CP55,940 were 1.2 nM in brain and > 5000nM in NG108-15 membranes. Moreover, sodium and GTP-gamma-S decreased [3H]WIN 55212-2 binding in brain but not in NG108-15 membranes. 3. These data suggest that WIN 55212-2 does not label traditional cannabinoid receptors in NG108-15 cells and that these novel aminoalkylindole binding sites are not coupled to G proteins.

Topics: Analgesics; Animals; Arachidonic Acids; Benzoxazines; Binding, Competitive; Calcium Channel Blockers; Cannabinoids; Cerebellum; Cyclohexanols; Endocannabinoids; Glioma; Guanosine 5'-O-(3-Thiotriphosphate); Hybrid Cells; Male; Membrane Proteins; Morpholines; Naphthalenes; Neuroblastoma; Polyunsaturated Alkamides; Radioligand Assay; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Receptors, Cannabinoid; Receptors, Drug; Sensitivity and Specificity; Tritium

Cannabinoid receptor ligands irreversibly inhibited peak voltage-activated Ca currents (44%) in NG108-15 cells; this inhibition was Pertussis toxin-sensitive. Inhibition was largely due to a reduction in the omega-conotoxin sensitive portion of high-voltage activated (HVA) current, although there was also a significant decrease in low-voltage activated current (56%) and in the nifedipine-sensitive portion of HVA current (41%).

Topics: Analgesics; Calcium Channel Blockers; Cannabinoids; Cyclohexanols; Dronabinol; GTP-Binding Proteins; Humans; Neuroblastoma; omega-Conotoxins; Peptides, Cyclic; Pertussis Toxin; Receptors, Cannabinoid; Receptors, Drug; Tumor Cells, Cultured; Virulence Factors, Bordetella