Page last updated: 2024-10-21

1-anilino-8-naphthalenesulfonate and Proteinuria

1-anilino-8-naphthalenesulfonate has been researched along with Proteinuria in 11 studies

1-anilino-8-naphthalenesulfonate: RN given refers to parent cpd
8-anilinonaphthalene-1-sulfonic acid : A naphthalenesulfonic acid that is naphthalene-1-sulfonic acid substituted by a phenylamino group at position 8.

Proteinuria: The presence of proteins in the urine, an indicator of KIDNEY DISEASES.

Research Excerpts

ExcerptRelevanceReference
" One dose-limiting toxicity of grade 3 proteinuria due to axitinib was reported among the six patients treated during the dose-finding phase."5.27Preliminary results for avelumab plus axitinib as first-line therapy in patients with advanced clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma (JAVELIN Renal 100): an open-label, dose-finding and dose-expansion, phase 1b trial. ( Atkins, MB; Chism, DD; Cho, D; Choueiri, TK; Compagnoni, A; di Pietro, A; Fowst, C; Gordon, MS; Gupta, S; Larkin, J; Martignoni, M; McDermott, D; Nathan, P; Oya, M; Powles, T; Rini, BI; Robbins, PB; Thistlethwaite, F; Tomita, Y; Uemura, H, 2018)
"Imai rats exhibit spontaneous focal glomerulosclerosis (FGS) with progressive proteinuria and hyperlipidemia leading to renal insufficiency by age 34 weeks."1.32Protein restriction and AST-120 improve lipoprotein lipase and VLDL receptor in focal glomerulosclerosis. ( Liang, K; Sato, T; Vaziri, ND, 2003)
"Heavy proteinuria is associated with marked abnormalities of lipoprotein metabolism and increased risk of atherogenesis."1.30Increased atherogenicity of low-density lipoprotein in heavy proteinuria. ( Boulton-Jones, JM; Caslake, MJ; Deighan, CJ; McConnell, M; Packard, CJ, 1998)

Research

Studies (11)

TimeframeStudies, this research(%)All Research%
pre-19904 (36.36)18.7374
1990's2 (18.18)18.2507
2000's1 (9.09)29.6817
2010's4 (36.36)24.3611
2020's0 (0.00)2.80

Authors

AuthorsStudies
Choueiri, TK1
Larkin, J1
Oya, M1
Thistlethwaite, F1
Martignoni, M1
Nathan, P1
Powles, T1
McDermott, D1
Robbins, PB1
Chism, DD1
Cho, D1
Atkins, MB1
Gordon, MS1
Gupta, S1
Uemura, H1
Tomita, Y1
Compagnoni, A1
Fowst, C1
di Pietro, A1
Rini, BI1
Targher, G1
Mantovani, A1
Alisi, A1
Mosca, A1
Panera, N1
Byrne, CD1
Nobili, V1
Liu, ZX1
Hong, Q1
Peng, DH1
Yang, Y1
Yu, WL1
Shui, H1
Zhou, X1
Liu, SM1
Vaziri, ND3
Sato, T1
Liang, K2
Deighan, CJ1
Caslake, MJ1
McConnell, M1
Boulton-Jones, JM1
Packard, CJ1
Cox, RA1
Gökcen, M1
Ling, GV1
Lowenstine, LJ1
Pulley, LT1
Kaneko, JJ1
de Schepper, J1
Capiau, E1
van Bree, H1
de Cock, I1
Klopocki, T1
Wysokińska-Borowicz, A1
Sawicki, Z1
Zenkteler, J1
Krayczyński, J1

Clinical Trials (2)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
A PHASE 1B, OPEN-LABEL, DOSE-FINDING STUDY TO EVALUATE SAFETY, PHARMACOKINETICS AND PHARMACODYNAMICS OF AVELUMAB (MSB0010718C) IN COMBINATION WITH AXITINIB (AG-013736) IN PATIENTS WITH PREVIOUSLY UNTREATED ADVANCED RENAL CELL CANCER[NCT02493751]Phase 155 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-10-26Completed
Estudio clínico Fase III Para Evaluar la Eficacia terapéutica en Pacientes Mexicanos Con Dislipidemia Mediante el Uso vía Oral de L-Carnitina + Atorvastatina Comparado Con Atorvastatina[NCT03696940]Phase 3120 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-05-28Active, not recruiting
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

Duration of Response (DR) Based on RECIST Version 1.1

DR was defined as the time from the first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR) that was subsequently confirmed to the first documentation of objective tumor progression or to death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target lesions with the exception of nodal disease. All target nodes must decrease to normal size (short axis <10 mm). PR was defined as >= 30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions. The short diameter was used in the sum for target nodes, while the longest diameter was used in the sum for all other target lesions. All target lesions must have been assessed. The results reflect data available on cutoff of PCD (03 Apr 2018). (NCT02493751)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 up to 30 months after the first dose

Interventionmonths (Median)
Axitinib + Avelumab With Lead-inNA
Axitinib + AvelumabNA

Number of Participants Achieving Disease Control (DC) Based on RECIST Version 1.1

DC was defined as OR (CR or PR) or stable disease (SD) per RECIST v1.1 from the start date until the first documentation of objective disease progression or death due to any cause. SD was defined as not qualifying for CR, PR, or progression (PD). PD was defined as 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target measurable lesions above the smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease in the sum was observed during therapy), with a minimum absolute increase of 5 mm. CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target lesions with the exception of nodal disease. All target nodes must decrease to normal size (short axis <10 mm). PR was defined as >= 30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions. The short diameter was used in the sum for target nodes, while the longest diameter was used in the sum for all other target lesions. All target lesions must have been assessed. The results reflect data available on cutoff of PCD (03 Apr 2018). (NCT02493751)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 up to 30 months after the first dose

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Axitinib + Avelumab With Lead-in15
Axitinib + Avelumab28

Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)

DLT: greater than or equal to (>=) Grade 3 hematologic/non-hematologic toxicity, Grade 3-4 liver-related laboratory test elevation (alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase) with Grade 2 elevation of total bilirubin, non-hematologic Grade 3 laboratory abnormality (required medical intervention to treat participant/led to hospitalization), inability to complete >=75% of first 2 cycles doses of axitinib (from Cycle 1 Day 1 after completion of lead-in period) or 2 infusions of avelumab within DLT observation period due to investigational product related toxicity. (NCT02493751)
Timeframe: DLT observation period (from the beginning of Cycle 1 up to the end of Cycle 2 [28 days])

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Axitinib + Avelumab With Lead-in1

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time from the start date to the date of death due to any cause. The results reflect data available on cutoff of PCD (03 Apr 2018). (NCT02493751)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 up to 30 months after the first dose

Interventionmonths (Median)
Axitinib + Avelumab With Lead-inNA
Axitinib + AvelumabNA

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined as defined as the time from the start date to the date of the first documentation of objective progression of disease (PD) or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. PD was defined as 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target measurable lesions above the smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease in the sum was observed during therapy), with a minimum absolute increase of 5 mm. All target lesions must have been assessed. The results reflect data available on cutoff of PCD (03 Apr 2018). (NCT02493751)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 up to 30 months after the first dose

Interventionmonths (Median)
Axitinib + Avelumab With Lead-in19.2
Axitinib + Avelumab7.6

Time to Tumor Response (TTR) Based on RECIST Version 1.1

TTR was defined as the time from start date to the first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR) that was subsequently confirmed. CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target lesions with the exception of nodal disease. All target nodes must decrease to normal size (short axis <10 mm). PR was defined as >= 30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions. The short diameter was used in the sum for target nodes, while the longest diameter was used in the sum for all other target lesions. All target lesions must have been assessed. The results reflect data available on cutoff of PCD (03 Apr 2018). (NCT02493751)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 up to 30 months after the first dose

Interventionmonths (Median)
Axitinib + Avelumab With Lead-in1.6
Axitinib + Avelumab1.4

Area Under the Plasma Concentration Time Profile From Time Zero to the Next Dose at Steady State (AUCtau) for Axitinib When Dosed Alone and in Combination With Avelumab

AUCtau was defined as area under the plasma concentration time profile from time zero to time tau, the dosing interval at steady state. tau = 12 hrs for Axitinib. AUCtau for Axitinib when dosed alone on Lead-in Day 7 and in combination with avelumab on Cycle 4 Day 1 for Axitinib + Avelumab with Lead-in Arm was reported. The results reflect data available on cutoff of PCD (03 Apr 2018). (NCT02493751)
Timeframe: Predose, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8 hours post dose on Lead-in Day 7 and Cycle 4 Day 1

Interventionnanograms*hour/milliliter (ng*hr/mL) (Geometric Mean)
Lean-in Day 7Cycle 4 Day 1
Axitinib + Avelumab With Lead-in113.1195.60

Change From Baseline in Vital Signs - Pulse Rate

Pulse rate was taken with the participant in the seated position after the participant had been sitting quietly for at least 5 minutes. Baseline was defined as the last assessment prior to the date/time of the first dose of study treatment, which occurred on Day 1 in Lead-in period for participants with lead-in, and occurred on Cycle 1 Day 1 (C1D1) for participants without lead-in. The results reflect data available on cutoff of PCD (03 Apr 2018). (NCT02493751)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1 of each cycle, Day 8 of Cycles 1 and 2, end of treatment, Follow-up Days 30, 60, 90 for all participants in the analysis population, and Lead-in Day 7 for participants with lead-in (maximum of 139.6 weeks by PCD)

Interventionbeats per minute (bpm) (Median)
C1D8C2D1C2D8C3D1C4D1C5D1C6D1C7D1C8D1C9D1C10D1C11D1C12D1C13D1C14D1C15D1C16D1C17D1C18D1C19D1C20D1C21D1C22D1C23D1C24D1C25D1C26D1C27D1C28D1C29D1C30D1C31D1C32D1C33D1C34D1C35D1C36D1C37D1C38D1C39D1C40D1C41D1C42D1C43D1C44D1C45D1C46D1C47D1C48D1C49D1C50D1C51D1C52D1C53D1C54D1C55D1C56D1End of TreatmentFollow-up Day 30Follow-up Day 60Follow-up Day 90
Axitinib + Avelumab-2.04.02.02.04.02.53.51.0-1.01.03.03.01.52.05.0-3.01.51.53.0-3.01.02.5-6.0-3.00.0-4.5-3.00.50.5-4.0-2.0-3.52.01.01.02.50.00.02.0-1.02.51.00.01.05.09.511.55.54.5-0.54.06.03.010.01.05.01.06.5-2.03.05.5

Change From Baseline in Vital Signs - Pulse Rate

Pulse rate was taken with the participant in the seated position after the participant had been sitting quietly for at least 5 minutes. Baseline was defined as the last assessment prior to the date/time of the first dose of study treatment, which occurred on Day 1 in Lead-in period for participants with lead-in, and occurred on Cycle 1 Day 1 (C1D1) for participants without lead-in. The results reflect data available on cutoff of PCD (03 Apr 2018). (NCT02493751)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1 of each cycle, Day 8 of Cycles 1 and 2, end of treatment, Follow-up Days 30, 60, 90 for all participants in the analysis population, and Lead-in Day 7 for participants with lead-in (maximum of 139.6 weeks by PCD)

Interventionbeats per minute (bpm) (Median)
Lean-in Day 7C1D1C1D8C2D1C2D8C3D1C4D1C5D1C6D1C7D1C8D1C9D1C10D1C11D1C12D1C13D1C14D1C15D1C16D1C17D1C18D1C19D1C20D1C21D1C22D1C23D1C24D1C25D1C26D1C27D1C28D1C29D1C30D1C31D1C32D1C33D1C34D1C35D1C36D1C37D1C38D1C39D1C40D1C41D1C42D1C43D1C44D1C45D1C46D1C47D1C48D1C49D1C50D1C51D1C52D1C53D1C54D1C55D1C56D1C57D1C58D1C59D1C60D1C61D1C62D1End of TreatmentFollow-up Day 30Follow-up Day 60Follow-up Day 90
Axitinib + Avelumab With Lead-in-0.5-1.0-2.03.08.04.01.50.0-3.51.0-6.5-1.5-3.0-2.0-6.0-1.51.5-4.5-1.0-6.00.0-1.02.0-1.50.02.0-3.50.0-4.01.5-8.5-6.0-3.01.52.0-4.0-1.0-2.01.01.5-1.00.0-3.0-5.0-3.04.52.02.51.05.0-3.010.0-2.00.00.56.02.5-6.51.5-4.04.02.01.52.09.02.5-1.02.09.0

Change From Baseline in Vital Signs - Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure

Blood pressure was taken with the participant in the seated position after the participant had been sitting quietly for at least 5 minutes. Baseline was defined as the last assessment prior to the date/time of the first dose of study treatment, which occurred on Day 1 in Lead-in period for participants with lead-in, and occurred on Cycle 1 Day 1 (C1D1) for participants without lead-in. The results reflect data available on cutoff of primary completion date (PCD) (03 Apr 2018). (NCT02493751)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1 of each cycle, Day 8 of Cycles 1 and 2, end of treatment, Follow-up Days 30, 60, 90 for all participants in the analysis population, and Lead-in Day 7 for participants with lead-in (maximum of 139.6 weeks by PCD)

Interventionmillimeter of mercury (mm Hg) (Mean)
C1D8C2D1C2D8C3D1C4D1C5D1C6D1C7D1C8D1C9D1C10D1C11D1C12D1C13D1C14D1C15D1C16D1C17D1C18D1C19D1C20D1C21D1C22D1C23D1C24D1C25D1C26D1C27D1C28D1C29D1C30D1C31D1C32D1C33D1C34D1C35D1C36D1C37D1C38D1C39D1C40D1C41D1C42D1C43D1C44D1C45D1C46D1C47D1C48D1C49D1C50D1C51D1C52D1C53D1C54D1C55D1C56D1End of TreatmentFollow-up Day 30Follow-up Day 60Follow-up Day 90
Axitinib + Avelumab9.810.114.710.28.86.97.57.59.010.07.77.56.610.57.27.65.86.45.15.56.96.66.24.54.36.07.86.26.27.16.16.77.63.65.08.110.97.66.97.96.08.45.72.56.65.43.01.13.911.87.04.38.22.00.3-3.00.02.5-2.93.81.3

Change From Baseline in Vital Signs - Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure

Blood pressure was taken with the participant in the seated position after the participant had been sitting quietly for at least 5 minutes. Baseline was defined as the last assessment prior to the date/time of the first dose of study treatment, which occurred on Day 1 in Lead-in period for participants with lead-in, and occurred on Cycle 1 Day 1 (C1D1) for participants without lead-in. The results reflect data available on cutoff of primary completion date (PCD) (03 Apr 2018). (NCT02493751)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1 of each cycle, Day 8 of Cycles 1 and 2, end of treatment, Follow-up Days 30, 60, 90 for all participants in the analysis population, and Lead-in Day 7 for participants with lead-in (maximum of 139.6 weeks by PCD)

Interventionmillimeter of mercury (mm Hg) (Mean)
Lead-in Day 7C1D1C1D8C2D1C2D8C3D1C4D1C5D1C6D1C7D1C8D1C9D1C10D1C11D1C12D1C13D1C14D1C15D1C16D1C17D1C18D1C19D1C20D1C21D1C22D1C23D1C24D1C25D1C26D1C27D1C28D1C29D1C30D1C31D1C32D1C33D1C34D1C35D1C36D1C37D1C38D1C39D1C40D1C41D1C42D1C43D1C44D1C45D1C46D1C47D1C48D1C49D1C50D1C51D1C52D1C53D1C54D1C55D1C56D1C57D1C58D1C59D1C60D1C61D1C62D1End of TreatmentFollow-up Day 30Follow-up Day 60Follow-up Day 90
Axitinib + Avelumab With Lead-in5.44.13.23.41.86.13.64.83.04.85.73.97.37.45.36.05.46.97.56.24.36.37.98.97.29.27.33.15.64.54.95.45.64.87.15.53.57.27.59.95.06.67.86.65.913.08.38.111.18.46.39.49.09.39.315.412.516.010.014.516.526.522.524.522.0-1.6-3.2-4.7-2.0

Change From Baseline in Vital Signs - Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure

Blood pressure was taken with the participant in the seated position after the participant had been sitting quietly for at least 5 minutes. Baseline was defined as the last assessment prior to the date/time of the first dose of study treatment, which occurred on Day 1 in Lead-in period for participants with lead-in, and occurred on Cycle 1 Day 1 (C1D1) for participants without lead-in. The results reflect data available on cutoff of PCD (03 Apr 2018). (NCT02493751)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1 of each cycle, Day 8 of Cycles 1 and 2, end of treatment, Follow-up Days 30, 60, 90 for all participants in the analysis population, and Lead-in Day 7 for participants with lead-in (maximum of 139.6 weeks by PCD)

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
C1D8C2D1C2D8C3D1C4D1C5D1C6D1C7D1C8D1C9D1C10D1C11D1C12D1C13D1C14D1C15D1C16D1C17D1C18D1C19D1C20D1C21D1C22D1C23D1C24D1C25D1C26D1C27D1C28D1C29D1C30D1C31D1C32D1C33D1C34D1C35D1C36D1C37D1C38D1C39D1C40D1C41D1C42D1C43D1C44D1C45D1C46D1C47D1C48D1C49D1C50D1C51D1C52D1C53D1C54D1C55D1C56D1End of TreatmentFollow-up Day 30Follow-up Day 60Follow-up Day 90
Axitinib + Avelumab10.311.217.78.75.86.75.26.18.010.28.47.24.18.63.97.35.53.54.22.61.13.10.21.5-0.13.53.41.62.14.12.91.73.80.22.52.95.32.74.94.33.83.70.9-1.90.8-3.5-3.42.8-1.37.00.91.45.41.50.06.03.03.51.715.39.3

Change From Baseline in Vital Signs - Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure

Blood pressure was taken with the participant in the seated position after the participant had been sitting quietly for at least 5 minutes. Baseline was defined as the last assessment prior to the date/time of the first dose of study treatment, which occurred on Day 1 in Lead-in period for participants with lead-in, and occurred on Cycle 1 Day 1 (C1D1) for participants without lead-in. The results reflect data available on cutoff of PCD (03 Apr 2018). (NCT02493751)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1 of each cycle, Day 8 of Cycles 1 and 2, end of treatment, Follow-up Days 30, 60, 90 for all participants in the analysis population, and Lead-in Day 7 for participants with lead-in (maximum of 139.6 weeks by PCD)

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Lead-in Day 7C1D1C1D8C2D1C2D8C3D1C4D1C5D1C6D1C7D1C8D1C9D1C10D1C11D1C12D1C13D1C14D1C15D1C16D1C17D1C18D1C19D1C20D1C21D1C22D1C23D1C24D1C25D1C26D1C27D1C28D1C29D1C30D1C31D1C32D1C33D1C34D1C35D1C36D1C37D1C38D1C39D1C40D1C41D1C42D1C43D1C44D1C45D1C46D1C47D1C48D1C49D1C50D1C51D1C52D1C53D1C54D1C55D1C56D1C57D1C58D1C59D1C60D1C61D1C62D1End of TreatmentFollow-up Day 30Follow-up Day 60Follow-up Day 90
Axitinib + Avelumab With Lead-in9.711.08.04.60.89.96.76.26.510.213.511.48.97.86.87.35.87.36.27.33.55.88.35.02.99.39.14.02.85.47.83.36.42.78.62.92.810.39.010.28.33.810.97.911.612.39.69.16.16.6-0.15.49.713.54.317.010.815.88.511.58.021.522.020.014.511.315.016.020.7

Cmax for Avelumab

Cmax for avelumab on Cycle 1 Day (C1D1) and C1D4 were reported. The results reflect data available on cutoff of PCD (03 Apr 2018). (NCT02493751)
Timeframe: Predose, 1 hour, and 168 hours post dose on Cycle 1 Day 1; predose and 1 hour post dose on Cycle 4 Day 1

Interventionug/mL (Geometric Mean)
C1D1C4D1
All Participants233.4278.0

Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for Axitinib When Dosed Alone and in Combination With Avelumab

Cmax for axitinib when dosed alone on Lead-in Day 7 and in combination with avelumab on Cycle 4 Day 1 for Axitinib + Avelumab with Lead-in Arm. The results reflect data available on cutoff of PCD (03 Apr 2018). (NCT02493751)
Timeframe: Predose, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8 hours post dose on Lead-in Day 7 and Cycle 4 Day 1

Interventionnanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) (Geometric Mean)
Lean-in Day 7Cycle 4 Day 1
Axitinib + Avelumab With Lead-in23.194716.5806

Number of Participants Achieving Objective Response (OR) Based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1

Confirmed OR was defined as complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to RECIST v1.1 from the start date until disease progression or death due to any cause. CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target lesions with the exception of nodal disease. All target nodes must decrease to normal size (short axis <10 mm). PR was defined as >= 30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions. The short diameter was used in the sum for target nodes, while the longest diameter was used in the sum for all other target lesions. All target lesions must have been assessed. The results reflect data available on cutoff of PCD (03 Apr 2018). (NCT02493751)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 up to 30 months after the first dose

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
CRPR
Axitinib + Avelumab221
Axitinib + Avelumab With Lead-in28

Number of Participants With All-causality Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

Adverse event (AE)=any untoward medical occurrence in participant who received study treatment without regard to causality. TEAE=event between first dose of study treatment and up to 30 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or worsened relative to pretreatment state. Serious AE (SAE)=AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience; persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. AEs were graded by worst National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.03 severity grade. Grade 3 event=unacceptable or intolerable event, significantly interrupting usual daily activity, require systemic drug therapy/other treatment. Grade 4 event caused participant to be in imminent danger of death. Grade 5 event=death related to AE. The results reflect data available on cutoff of LPLV (04 Mar 2021). (NCT02493751)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 30 days after the last dose of study treatment (maximum of 259.7 weeks)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Participants with TEAEsParticipants with Grade >=3 TEAEsParticipants with SAEs
Axitinib + Avelumab393018
Axitinib + Avelumab With Lead-in16136

Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) Against Avelumab When Combined With Axitinib by Never and Ever Positive Status

Whole blood specimens were collected at the designated times (Day 1 of Cycles 1-4, 6, and 8, then every 12 weeks until Cycle 50, and Follow-up Day 30) to provide serum for evaluation of avelumab immunogenicity. Human serum ADA specimens were analyzed for the presence or absence of anti-avelumab antibodies with quasi-quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, following a tiered approach using screening, confirmation and titer/quantitation. ADA serum specimens were screened at tier 1. In the event that there were no positive specimens, no further analyses were to be conducted. If positive specimens were identified, these specimens were further tested with the confirmatory assay to confirm as positive. Number of participants with ADA positive at baseline, ADA never-positive, ADA ever-positive, treatment-boosted ADA, treatment-induced ADA, transient ADA response, or persistent ADA response from baseline up to 2 years. The results reflect data available on cutoff of PCD (03 Apr 2018). (NCT02493751)
Timeframe: Pre-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1-4, 6, 8, then every 12 weeks thereafter until Cycle 50, and on Follow-up Day 30 (maximum of 2 years)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
ADA positive at baseline (ADA_bp)ADA never-positive (ADA_n)ADA ever-positive (ADA_p)Treatment-boosted ADA (Tb_ADA)Treatment-induced ADA (Ti_ADA)Transient ADA response (t_ADA)Persistent ADA response (p_ADA)
Axitinib + Avelumab03180853
Axitinib + Avelumab With Lead-in21230101

Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities Graded by NCI CTCAE Version 4.03 - Chemistry

Laboratory abnormalities (chemistry) reported included creatinine increased, serum amylase increased, lipase increased, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) increased, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) increased, blood bilirubin increased, creatine kinase increased, hypoglycemia, and hyperglycemia. Grade 1=mild transient reaction; infusion interruption not indicated; intervention not indicated. Grade 2=therapy or infusion interruption indicated but responds promptly to symptomatic treatment; prophylactic medications indicated for <=24 hours. Grade 3=prolonged; recurrence of symptoms following initial improvement; hospitalization indicated for clinical sequelae. Grade 4=life threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated. Grade 5=death. The results reflect data available on cutoff of LPLV (04 Mar 2021). (NCT02493751)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 30 days after the last dose of study treatment and 1 day before the start day of new anti-cancer drug therapy (maximum of 259.7 weeks)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Participants with Grade >=1 creatinine increasedParticipants with Grade >=3 creatinine increasedParticipants with Grade >=1 serum amylase increasedParticipants with Grade >=3 serum amylase increasedParticipants with Grade >=1 lipase increasedParticipants with Grade >=3 lipase increasedParticipants with Grade >=1 ALT increasedParticipants with Grade >=3 ALT increasedParticipants with Grade >=1 AST increasedParticipants with Grade >=3 AST increasedParticipants with Grade >=1 blood bilirubin increasedParticipants with Grade >=3 blood bilirubin increasedParticipants with Grade >=1 creatine kinase increasedParticipants with Grade >=3 creatine kinase increasedParticipants with Grade >=1 hypoglycemiaParticipants with Grade >=3 hypoglycemiaParticipants with Grade >=1 hyperglycemiaParticipants with Grade >=3 hyperglycemia
Axitinib + Avelumab3701631682022117015040131
Axitinib + Avelumab With Lead-in160114958210120614052

Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities Graded by NCI CTCAE Version 4.03 - Hematology

Laboratory abnormalities (hematology) reported included anemia, platelet count decreased, lymphocyte count decreased, and neutrophil count decreased. Grade 1=mild transient reaction; infusion interruption not indicated; intervention not indicated. Grade 2=therapy or infusion interruption indicated but responds promptly to symptomatic treatment; prophylactic medications indicated for <=24 hours. Grade 3=prolonged; recurrence of symptoms following initial improvement; hospitalization indicated for clinical sequelae. Grade 4=life threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated. Grade 5=death. The results reflect data available on cutoff of LPLV (04 Mar 2021). (NCT02493751)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 30 days after the last dose of study treatment and 1 day before the start day of new anti-cancer drug therapy (maximum of 259.7 weeks)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Participants with Grade >=1 anemiaParticipants with Grade >=3 anemiaParticipants with Grade >=1 platelet count decreasedParticipants with Grade >=3 platelet count decreasedParticipants with Grade >=1 lymphocyte count decreasedParticipants with Grade >=3 lymphocyte count decreasedParticipants with Grade >=1 neutrophil count decreasedParticipants with Grade >=3 neutrophil count decreased
Axitinib + Avelumab24211016340
Axitinib + Avelumab With Lead-in804010110

Number of Participants With Their Target Programmed Death-Ligand (PD-L1) Status at Baseline

Number of participants with PD-L1 positive (PD-L1 >=1%) status in immune cell (IC), tumor cell (TC), or both IC and TC. The results reflect data available on cutoff of PCD (03 Apr 2018). (NCT02493751)
Timeframe: Baseline

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
ICTCIC+TC
Axitinib + Avelumab301532
Axitinib + Avelumab With Lead-in11311

Number of Participants With Treatment-related TEAEs

Treatment-related AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. TEAE=event between first dose of study treatment and up to 30 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience; persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. AEs were graded by worst NCI CTCAE v4.03 severity grade. Grade 3 events=unacceptable or intolerable events, significantly interrupting usual daily activity, require systemic drug therapy/other treatment. Grade 4 events caused participant to be in imminent danger of death. Grade 5 events=death related to an AE. Treatment-related AEs and SAEs were determined by the investigator. The results reflect data available on cutoff of LPLV (04 Mar 2021). (NCT02493751)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 30 days after the last dose of study treatment (maximum of 259.7 weeks)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Participants with treatment-related TEAEsParticipants with Grade >=3 treatment-related TEAEsParticipants with treatment-related SAEs
Axitinib + Avelumab392310
Axitinib + Avelumab With Lead-in15113

Predose Concentration During Multiple Dosing (Ctrough) for Avelumab

Ctrough was directly observed from data. The results reflect data available on cutoff of PCD (03 Apr 2018). (NCT02493751)
Timeframe: Predose on Day 1 of Cycles 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 14, 20, 26, 32, 38, 44, and 50

Interventionmicrogram per milliliter (ug/mL) (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1 (C1D1)C2D1C3D1C4D1C6D1C8D1C14D1C20D1C26D1C32D1C38D1C44D1C50D1
All Participants1.020.323.923.426.328.336.141.038.440.844.567.540.5

Terminal Half-Life (t1/2) for Axitinib When Dosed Alone and in Combination With Avelumab

t1/2 was calculated by Log e(2)/kel. kel was the terminal phase rate constant calculated by a linear regression of the log linear concentration time-curve. Only those data points judged to describe the terminal log linear decline were used in the regression. t1/2 for Axitinib when dosed alone on Lead-in Day 7 and in combination with avelumab on Cycle 4 Day 1 for Axitinib + Avelumab with Lead-in Arm was reported. The results reflect data available on cutoff of PCD (03 Apr 2018). (NCT02493751)
Timeframe: Predose, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8 hours post dose on Lead-in Day 7 and Cycle 4 Day 1

Interventionhrs (Mean)
Lean-in Day 7Cycle 4 Day 1
Axitinib + Avelumab With Lead-in2.7553.252

Time for Cmax (Tmax) for Axitinib When Dosed Alone and in Combination With Avelumab

Tmax for axitinib when dosed alone on Lead-in Day 7 and in combination with avelumab on Cycle 4 Day 1 for Axitinib + Avelumab with Lead-in Arm. The results reflect data available on cutoff of PCD (03 Apr 2018). (NCT02493751)
Timeframe: Predose, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8 hours post dose on Lead-in Day 7 and Cycle 4 Day 1

Interventionhours (hrs) (Median)
Lean-in Day 7Cycle 4 Day 1
Axitinib + Avelumab With Lead-in2.09001.9850

Reviews

1 review available for 1-anilino-8-naphthalenesulfonate and Proteinuria

ArticleYear
Disorders of lipid metabolism in nephrotic syndrome: mechanisms and consequences.
    Kidney international, 2016, Volume: 90, Issue:1

    Topics: Cholesterol; Creatinine; Dyslipidemias; Humans; Lipase; Lipoproteins; Liver; Nephrotic Syndrome; Pro

2016

Trials

1 trial available for 1-anilino-8-naphthalenesulfonate and Proteinuria

ArticleYear
Preliminary results for avelumab plus axitinib as first-line therapy in patients with advanced clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma (JAVELIN Renal 100): an open-label, dose-finding and dose-expansion, phase 1b trial.
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2018, Volume: 19, Issue:4

    Topics: Aged; Alanine Transaminase; Amylases; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Ant

2018

Other Studies

9 other studies available for 1-anilino-8-naphthalenesulfonate and Proteinuria

ArticleYear
Relationship Between PNPLA3 rs738409 Polymorphism and Decreased Kidney Function in Children With NAFLD.
    Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.), 2019, Volume: 70, Issue:1

    Topics: Adolescent; Child; Child, Preschool; Cross-Sectional Studies; Female; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Hu

2019
Evaluation of serum free fatty acids in chronic renal failure: evidence from a rare case with undetectable serum free fatty acids and population data.
    Lipids in health and disease, 2019, Jul-08, Volume: 18, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Chemical Analysis; Case-Control Studies; Fatty Acid Synthase, Type I; Fatty Acids

2019
Protein restriction and AST-120 improve lipoprotein lipase and VLDL receptor in focal glomerulosclerosis.
    Kidney international, 2003, Volume: 64, Issue:5

    Topics: Adsorption; Animals; Carbon; Diet, Protein-Restricted; Dietary Proteins; Down-Regulation; Glomerulos

2003
Down-regulation of hepatic lipase expression in experimental nephrotic syndrome.
    Kidney international, 1997, Volume: 51, Issue:6

    Topics: Animals; Cholesterol; Lipase; Liver; Male; Nephrotic Syndrome; Proteinuria; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawl

1997
Increased atherogenicity of low-density lipoprotein in heavy proteinuria.
    Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association, 1998, Volume: 13, Issue:5

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Anthropometry; Apolipoproteins E; Arteriosclerosis; Female; Humans; Kidney; Lipase; Lip

1998
Effect of simian virus 40 subcutaneous tumors on circulating lipids and lipoproteins in the Syrian hamster.
    Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1975, Volume: 54, Issue:2

    Topics: Acetyltransferases; Animals; Cholesterol; Cholinesterases; Cricetinae; Glycerol; Lipase; Lipid Metab

1975
Diabetes mellitus in dogs: a review of initial evaluation, immediate and long-term management, and outcome.
    Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 1977, Mar-01, Volume: 170, Issue:5

    Topics: Amylases; Animals; Anorexia; Bicarbonates; Blood Glucose; Blood Urea Nitrogen; Cushing Syndrome; Deh

1977
The diagnostic significance of increased urinary and serum amylase activity in bitches with pyometra.
    Zentralblatt fur Veterinarmedizin. Reihe A, 1989, Volume: 36, Issue:6

    Topics: Amylases; Animals; Dog Diseases; Dogs; Female; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Lipase; Pancreatitis; Protei

1989
Lysozymuria as an index of renal injury occurring in the course of pancreatitis.
    Zeitschrift fur klinische Chemie und klinische Biochemie, 1974, Volume: 12, Issue:12

    Topics: Acute Disease; Amylases; Chronic Disease; Creatinine; Humans; Kidney Diseases; Lipase; Muramidase; P

1974