1-(4-(6-bromobenzo(1-3)dioxol-5-yl)-3a-4-5-9b-tetrahydro-3h-cyclopenta(c)quinolin-8-yl)ethanone and Adenocarcinoma

1-(4-(6-bromobenzo(1-3)dioxol-5-yl)-3a-4-5-9b-tetrahydro-3h-cyclopenta(c)quinolin-8-yl)ethanone has been researched along with Adenocarcinoma* in 2 studies

Other Studies

2 other study(ies) available for 1-(4-(6-bromobenzo(1-3)dioxol-5-yl)-3a-4-5-9b-tetrahydro-3h-cyclopenta(c)quinolin-8-yl)ethanone and Adenocarcinoma

ArticleYear
G protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER) mediates NSCLC progression induced by 17β-estradiol (E2) and selective agonist G1.
    Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2015, Volume: 32, Issue:4

    Estrogen classically drives lung cancer development via estrogen receptor β (ERβ). However, fulvestrant, an anti-estrogen-based endocrine therapeutic treatment, shows limited effects for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in phase II clinical trials. G protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER), a third estrogen receptor that binds to estrogen, has been found to be activated by fulvestrant, stimulating the progression of breast, endometrial, and ovarian cancers. We here demonstrated that cytoplasm-GPER (cGPER) (80.49 %) and nucleus-GPER (53.05 %) were detected by immunohistochemical analysis in NSCLC samples. cGPER expression was related to stages IIIA-IV, lymph node metastasis, and poorly differentiated NSCLC. Selective agonist G1 and 17β-estradiol (E2) promoted the GPER-mediated proliferation, invasion, and migration of NSCLC cells. Additionally, in vitro administration of E2 and G1 increased the number of tumor nodules, tumor grade, and tumor index in a urethane-induced adenocarcinoma model. Importantly, the pro-tumorigenic effects of GPER induced by E2 were significantly reduced by co-administering the GPER inhibitor G15 and the ERβ inhibitor fulvestrant, as compared to administering fulvestrant alone both in vitro and in vivo. Moreover, the phosphorylation of MAPK and Akt was involved in E2/G1-induced GPER activation. In conclusion, our results indicated that a pro-tumor function of GPER exists that mediated E2-/G1-dependent NSCLC progression and showed better efficiency regarding the co-targeting of GPER and ERβ, providing a rationale for further investigation of anti-estrogen clinical therapy.

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Aged; Animals; Apoptosis; Blotting, Western; Carcinogens; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Cell Adhesion; Cell Movement; Cell Proliferation; Cyclopentanes; Disease Progression; Estradiol; Estrogen Receptor Antagonists; Female; Fulvestrant; Humans; Immunoenzyme Techniques; Lung Neoplasms; Lymphatic Metastasis; Male; Mice; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Staging; Phosphorylation; Prognosis; Quinolines; Receptors, Estrogen; Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled; RNA, Small Interfering; Tissue Array Analysis; Tumor Cells, Cultured; Urethane; Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays

2015
G protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER) expression in endometrial adenocarcinoma and effect of agonist G-1 on growth of endometrial adenocarcinoma cell lines.
    Steroids, 2013, Volume: 78, Issue:11

    The G protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER, GPR30) is suggested to be involved in non-nuclear estrogen signaling and is expressed in a variety of hormone dependent cancer entities. This study was performed to further elucidate the role of this receptor in endometrial adenocarcinoma. We first analyzed GPER expression at the mRNA level in 88 endometrial cancer or normal endometrial tissue samples and compared it to those of nuclear steroid hormone receptors. GPER transcript levels were found to be about 6-fold reduced, but still present in endometrial cancer. Expression of this receptor was decreased in all grading subgroups when compared to pre- or postmenopausal endometrium. GPER mRNA expression was associated with PR mRNA levels (Spearman's rho 0.4610, p<0.001). We then tested the effect of the GPER ligand G-1 on growth of three endometrial cancer cell lines with different GPER expression. GPER protein levels were highest in RL95-2 cells, moderate in HEC-1A cells and not detectable in HEC-1B cells. The moderate expression level in HEC-1A cells was similar to average tumor tissue expression. Treatment with G-1 significantly inhibited growth of the GPER-positive cell lines RL95-2 and HEC-1A in a dose-dependent manner, whereas the GPER-negative line HEC-1B was not affected. Though GPER transcript levels were found to be reduced in endometrial cancer, our in vitro data suggest that moderate GPER expression might be sufficient to mediate growth-inhibitory effects triggered by its agonist G-1.

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Proliferation; Cyclopentanes; Endometrial Neoplasms; Endometrium; Estrogen Receptor alpha; Female; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic; Humans; Membrane Proteins; Middle Aged; PTEN Phosphohydrolase; Quinolines; Receptors, Estrogen; Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled; Receptors, Progesterone; RNA, Messenger

2013