1-(2-deoxy-beta-ribofuranosyl)-5-iodo-2-pyrimidinone and Colonic-Neoplasms

1-(2-deoxy-beta-ribofuranosyl)-5-iodo-2-pyrimidinone has been researched along with Colonic-Neoplasms* in 2 studies

Other Studies

2 other study(ies) available for 1-(2-deoxy-beta-ribofuranosyl)-5-iodo-2-pyrimidinone and Colonic-Neoplasms

ArticleYear
Differential radiosensitization in DNA mismatch repair-proficient and -deficient human colon cancer xenografts with 5-iodo-2-pyrimidinone-2'-deoxyribose.
    Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2004, Nov-15, Volume: 10, Issue:22

    5-iodo-2-pyrimidinone-2'-deoxyribose (IPdR) is a pyrimidinone nucleoside prodrug of 5-iododeoxyuridine (IUdR) under investigation as an orally administered radiosensitizer. We previously reported that the mismatch repair (MMR) proteins (both hMSH2 and hMLH1) impact on the extent (percentage) of IUdR-DNA incorporation and subsequent in vitro IUdR-mediated radiosensitization in human tumor cell lines. In this study, we used oral IPdR to assess in vivo radiosensitization in MMR-proficient (MMR+) and -deficient (MMR-) human colon cancer xenografts.. We tested whether oral IPdR treatment (1 g/kg/d for 14 days) can result in differential IUdR incorporation in tumor cell DNA and subsequent radiosensitization after a short course (every day for 4 days) of fractionated radiation therapy, by using athymic nude mice with an isogenic pair of human colon cancer xenografts, HCT116 (MMR-, hMLH1-) and HCT116/3-6 (MMR+, hMLH1+). A tumor regrowth assay was used to assess radiosensitization. Systemic toxicity was assessed by daily body weights and by percentage of IUdR-DNA incorporation in normal bone marrow and intestine.. After a 14-day once-daily IPdR treatment by gastric gavage, significantly higher IUdR-DNA incorporation was found in HCT116 (MMR-) tumor xenografts compared with HCT116/3-6 (MMR+) tumor xenografts. Using a tumor regrowth assay after the 14-day drug treatment and a 4-day radiation therapy course (days 11-14 of IPdR), we found substantial radiosensitization in both HCT116 and HCT116/3-6 tumor xenografts. However, the sensitizer enhancement ratio (SER) was substantially higher in HCT116 (MMR-) tumor xenografts (1.48 at 2 Gy per fraction, 1.41 at 4 Gy per fraction), compared with HCT116/3-6 (MMR+) tumor xenografts (1.21 at 2 Gy per fraction, 1.20 at 4 Gy per fraction). No substantial systemic toxicity was found in the treatment groups.. These results suggest that IPdR-mediated radiosensitization can be an effective in vivo approach to treat "drug-resistant" MMR-deficient tumors as well as MMR-proficient tumors.

    Topics: Animals; Base Pair Mismatch; Cell Cycle; Cell Line, Tumor; Colonic Neoplasms; DNA; DNA Repair; Dose Fractionation, Radiation; Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation; Humans; Mice; Mice, Nude; Neoplasm Transplantation; Neoplasms; Pyrimidine Nucleosides; Radiation-Sensitizing Agents; Time Factors

2004
An in vivo comparison of oral 5-iodo-2'-deoxyuridine and 5-iodo-2-pyrimidinone-2'-deoxyribose toxicity, pharmacokinetics, and DNA incorporation in athymic mouse tissues and the human colon cancer xenograft, HCT-116.
    Cancer research, 1994, May-15, Volume: 54, Issue:10

    5-iodo-2-pyrimidinone-2'-deoxyribose (IPdR) was recently reported to be converted to 5-iodo-2'-deoxyuridine (IUdR) by an aldehyde oxidase, most concentrated in liver tissue. We questioned whether IPdR could be used as a p.o. hepatotropic prodrug to increase the percentage of IUdR-DNA incorporation into liver tumors compared to normal liver with acceptable systemic toxicity. Athymic nude mice with human colon cancer (HCT-116) xenograft tumors as liver metastases and s.c. flank tumors received daily p.o. boluses (via gastric tubes) of IUdR or IPdR for 6 days. The maximum tolerated dose of IUdR was 250 mg/kg/day and was associated with a > 10% weight loss and a high percentage of IUdR-DNA incorporation (> 5%) into normal bone marrow and intestine. In contrast, animals tolerated escalating doses of IPdR to 1 gm/kg/day without weight loss and with less (1.5-4%) IUdR-DNA incorporation in normal tissues. Pharmacokinetic analysis of p.o. IPdR showed peak plasma levels of IPdR and IUdR within 15-45 min, suggesting efficient conversion of IPdR to IUdR. Aldehyde oxidase activity was found in normal liver tissue but not in other normal or tumor tissues. Additionally, we found a 2-3 times greater percentage of IUdR-DNA incorporation in tumor with IPdR than IUdR at the highest doses used. However, no differential effect in the percentage of IUdR-DNA incorporation was noted between liver metastases and s.c. tumors with either IPdR or IUdR. We conclude that p.o. IPdR offers a greater therapeutic index for tumor incorporation (and presumably radiosensitization) than a similar schedule of IUdR.

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Animals; Colonic Neoplasms; DNA; Female; Humans; Idoxuridine; Liver; Liver Neoplasms; Mice; Neoplasm Transplantation; Pyrimidine Nucleosides; Tissue Distribution

1994