zithromax and tosufloxacin

Azithromycin has adequate tissue levels for 7 days with a 3 day treatment regimen. The antibacterial activity is excellent. In dental infections, recurrence of infection happens when antibiotics cause a temporary improvement in symptoms but the etiologic agent is not eradicated. Azithromycin produces a "focused" cure and is an appropriate antibiotic for these infections. For this reason, the antibiotic was approved.

Topics: Anti-Infective Agents; Azithromycin; Bacteria; Bacterial Infections; Clinical Trials as Topic; Double-Blind Method; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Fluoroquinolones; Humans; Naphthyridines; Periodontal Diseases; Treatment Outcome

The importance of macrolide-resistant (MR) Mycoplasma pneumoniae has become much more apparent in the past decade. We investigated differences in the therapeutic efficacies of macrolides, minocycline, and tosufloxacin against MR M. pneumoniae. A total of 188 children with M. pneumoniae pneumonia confirmed by culture and PCR were analyzed. Of these, 150 patients had a strain with an MR gene and 134 had one with an A-to-G mutation at position 2063 of M. pneumoniae 23S rRNA domain V. Azithromycin (n = 27), clarithromycin (n = 23), tosufloxacin (n = 62), or minocycline (n = 38) was used for definitive treatment of patients with MR M. pneumoniae. Defervescence within 48 h after the initiation of antibiotic therapy was observed in 41% of the patients in the azithromycin group, 48% of those in the clarithromycin group, 69% of those in the tosufloxacin group, and 87% of those in the minocycline group. The average number of days of fever after the administration of antibiotic treatment was lower in the minocycline and tosufloxacin groups than in the macrolide groups. The decrease in the M. pneumoniae burden, as estimated by the number of DNA copies, after 48 to 96 h of treatment was more rapid in patients receiving minocycline (P = 0.016) than in those receiving tosufloxacin (P = 0.049), azithromycin (P = 0.273), or clarithromycin (P = 0.107). We found that the clinical and bacteriological efficacies of macrolides against MR M. pneumoniae pneumonia was low. Our results indicated that minocycline rather than tosufloxacin can be considered the first-choice drug for the treatment of M. pneumoniae pneumonia in children aged ≥ 8 years.

Topics: Adolescent; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azithromycin; Child; Child, Preschool; Clarithromycin; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Fluoroquinolones; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Male; Minocycline; Mutation; Mycoplasma pneumoniae; Naphthyridines; Pneumonia, Mycoplasma; RNA, Bacterial; RNA, Ribosomal, 23S; Treatment Outcome

To objectively assess azithromycin (AZM) for its clinical efficacy, safety and usefulness in the treatment of acute odontogenic infections (periodontitis, pericoronitis and osteitis of the jaw), a double-blind, randomized, multi-center trial was conducted in which tosufloxacin tosilate (TFLX) was used as the control drug. AZM was administered to 90 patients at a once-daily 500 mg dose for 3 days, while TFLX was given to 90 patients at a 150 mg t.i.d. dose for 7 days. 1. The clinical efficacy rates calculated according to evaluation at an endpoint set on the 3rd day of treatment by a committee of experts were 85.9% (73/85) in the AZM group and 78.9% (71/90) in the TFLX group. No statistically significant difference between the treatment groups was detected, and clinical equivalence was verified (p = 0.002). 2. The clinical efficacy rates according to evaluations made by investigators at the end-of-tail point was 87.1% (74/85) in the AZM group and 73.3% (66/90) in the TFLX group. The efficacy rate in the AZM group was higher than that in the TFLX group, and the difference was statistically significant (p = 0.006). 3. The bacteriological elimination rate in the AZM group was 97.5% (39/40) and that in the TFLX group was 85.7% (30/35), but the difference was deemed statistically not significant. 4. Adverse reactions were observed in 11 of 88 cases (12.5%) in the AZM group and 5 of 90 cases (5.6%) in the TFLX group. Six of 85 cases (7.1%) in the AZM group and 5 of 85 cases (5.9%) in the TFLX group showed laboratory abnormalities. However, neither adverse reactions nor laboratory abnormalities showed any differences in statistical significance between the treatment groups. 5. The safety rates, expressed as percentages of cases with no adverse events and no laboratory abnormalities, was 84.1% (74/88) in the AZM group and 90.0% (81/90) in the TFLX group. The difference between the two groups was found to be statistically insignificant. 6. The usefulness rates, the ratio of cases rated as either "Very useful" or "Useful", was 83.9% (73/87) in the AZM group, and it was statistically higher (p = 0.025) than 72.2% (65/90) obtained for TFLX group. Judging from the above results, it has been concluded that AZM is as useful as TFLX in the treatment of acute dental infections.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Anti-Infective Agents; Azithromycin; Bacterial Infections; Double-Blind Method; Female; Fluoroquinolones; Humans; Japan; Jaw; Male; Middle Aged; Naphthyridines; Osteitis; Pericoronitis; Periodontitis

To clarify therapeutic effects of azithromycin, clarithromycin, minocycline and tosufloxacin against macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae (MRMP) pneumonia and against macrolide-sensitive Mycoplasma pneumoniae (MSMP) pneumonia in pediatric patients.. A prospective, multicenter observational study was conducted from July 2013 to August 2015. The therapeutic effects of azithromycin, clarithromycin, minocycline and tosufloxacin were evaluated in 59 patients with pneumonia caused by MRMP and in 50 patients with pneumonia caused by MSMP. In vitro activities of antimicrobial agents against isolates of Mycoplasma pneumoniae were also measured.. Mean durations of fever following commencement of treatment in patients infected with MRMP and MSMP were 5.2 and 1.9 days, respectively (log-rank test, P < 0.0001). Among patients infected with MRMP, mean durations of fever were 4.6, 5.5, 1.0 and 7.5 days for patients treated with azithromycin, clarithromycin, minocycline and tosufloxacin, respectively (log-rank test, P < 0.0001). Among patients infected with MSMP, mean durations of fever were 2.5, 1.7, 0.9 and 4.3 days for patients treated with azithromycin, clarithromycin, minocycline and tosufloxacin, respectively (log-rank test, P = 0.0162). The MIC90s of azithromycin and clarithromycin among the 27 isolates of MRMP were 64 and 256 μg/ml, respectively, and those among the 23 isolates of MSMP were <0.000125 and 0.001 μg/ml, respectively. The MIC90s of minocycline and tosufloxacin among the 27 isolates of MRMP were 1.0 and 0.25 μg/ml, respectively, and those among the 23 isolates of MSMP were 1.0 and 0.5 μg/ml, respectively.. Both minocycline and tosufloxacin showed good in vitro activities against MRMP. Minocycline, but not tosufloxacin, shortened the duration of fever in pediatric patients infected with MRMP compared to the duration of fever in patients treated with macrolides.

Topics: Adolescent; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azithromycin; Child; Clarithromycin; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Female; Fluoroquinolones; Humans; Male; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Minocycline; Mycoplasma pneumoniae; Naphthyridines; Pneumonia, Mycoplasma; Treatment Outcome

The activities of pazufloxacin and tosufloxacin against Legionella spp. were evaluated in vitro and compared with those of other quinolones, macrolides and azithromycin.. The conventional MICs were determined by the microbroth dilution method. Intracellular activities of drugs were evaluated by a cfu count. The minimal extracellular concentration inhibiting intracellular growth of bacteria (MIEC) was determined by a colorimetric cytopathic assay.. MICs of pazuloxacin and tosufloxacin at which 90% (MIC90) of isolates are inhibited in 76 different Legionella spp. strains (38 ATCC strains and 38 clinical isolates) were 0.032 and 0.016 mg/L, whereas the MIC90s of levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, garenoxacin, erythromycin, clarithromycin and azithromycin were 0.032, 0.032, 0.032, 2.0, 0.125 and 2.0 mg/L, respectively. Pazufloxacin and tosufloxacin at 4x MIC inhibited intracellular growth of Legionella pneumophila SG1 (80-045 strain), as did other quinolones, clarithromycin and azithromycin, whereas erythromycin at 4x MIC did not. MIECs of pazufloxacin, tosufloxacin, levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin and garenoxacin for the strain were 0.063, 0.004, 0.016, 0.032 and 0.008 mg/L respectively, which were superior to those of macrolides and azithromycin. Pazufloxacin showed potent activity against three additional clinical isolates of L. pneumophila SG1, one clinical isolate each of L. pneumophila SG3 and SG5, as well as Legionella micdadei, Legionella dumoffii and Legionella longbeachae SG1.. Pazufloxacin and tosufloxacin, as well as other quinolones, were more potent than macrolides and an azalide. Present data warrant further study on the efficacy of these drugs in the treatment of Legionella infections.

Topics: Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azithromycin; Cell Line; Colony Count, Microbial; Fluoroquinolones; Legionella; Macrolides; Macrophages; Mice; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Naphthyridines; Oxazines; Quinolones

The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of tosufloxacin (TFLX), levofloxacin (LVFX), ciprofloxacin (CPFX), gatifloxacin (GFLX), sparfloxacin (SPFX), azithromycin (AZM), cefteram (CFTM), cefdinir (CFDN) and cefpodoxime (CPDX) against 337 clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae isolated from Japanese hospital from 1997 to 2002 were investigated by agar plate method. The incidence of penicillin-susceptible S. pneumoniae (PSSP), penicillin-intermediate resistant S. pneumoniae (PISP), and penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae (PRSP) in each year was studied, and the MICs of antibacterial agents against these strains were determined. As the results, the total incidence of PSSP, PISP, and PRSP was 51.0%, 40.4% and 8.6%, respectively. The incidences of PSSP from 1997 to 2002 were 46.0-55.9%, and were almost definite in each year. In quinolone antibiotics, the differences of antibacterial activity among TFLX, SPFX, and GFLX against PSSP, PISP, and PRSP, were not observed, and these 3 quinolones had potent antibacterial activity. Although CPFX and LVFX showed antibacterial activity as well as other quinolones by 2001, the CPFX-resistant or LVFX-intermediate resistant strains of PSSP were seen with 56.5% and 91.3% in 2002, respectively. Thirty percents of each PSSP, PISP, and PRSP strains were AZM-resistant strains. Such tendency of increase was recognized in PSSP. Against cephem antibiotics, the incidence of intermediate resistant and resistant strains was higher for PISP and PRSP than for PSSP. No difference in the incidence of resistant strains was noted among CFTM, CFDN, and CPDX.

Topics: 4-Quinolones; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Anti-Infective Agents; Azithromycin; Cephalosporins; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Fluoroquinolones; Humans; Japan; Naphthyridines; Penicillin Resistance; Streptococcus pneumoniae; Time Factors

Chlamydia pneumoniae infection of lymphocytes in blood has been well documented, and it is apparent that control of this pathogen in these cells may be critical in the development of chronic inflammatory diseases associated with infection by this bacterium. The activity of antibiotics against C. pneumoniae in lymphocytes was assessed in this study by utilizing an in vitro infection model with lymphoid cells. The results obtained indicated that although all of the antibiotics tested showed remarkable activity against bacterial growth in epithelial cells, C. pneumoniae in lymphocytes was less susceptible to antibiotics than was bacterial growth in epithelial cells, which are widely used for the evaluation of anti-C. pneumoniae antibiotics.

Topics: Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Anti-Infective Agents; Azithromycin; Cells, Cultured; Chlamydia Infections; Chlamydophila pneumoniae; Clarithromycin; Female; Fluoroquinolones; Humans; Lymphocytes; Mice; Mice, Inbred BALB C; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Minocycline; Naphthyridines; Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction; RNA, Bacterial