zithromax has been researched along with sitafloxacin* in 4 studies
4 other study(ies) available for zithromax and sitafloxacin
Article | Year |
---|---|
Macrolide and fluoroquinolone resistance is uncommon in clinical strains of Chlamydia trachomatis.
We analyzed the 23S rRNA, gyrA and parC genes of Chlamydia trachomatis DNAs from men with urethritis and determined microbiological outcomes of an extended-release azithromycin (azithromycin-SR) regimen (2 g once daily for 1 day) and a sitafloxacin regimen (100 mg twice daily for 7 days) for chlamydial urethritis to clarify the macrolide and fluoroquinolone resistance status of clinical strains of C. trachomatis. We amplified the portions of 2 alleles of the 23S rRNA gene and the gyrA and parC genes from C. trachomatis DNAs in 284 first-voided urine specimens from men with chlamydial urethritis by PCR and sequenced their PCR products. We enrolled 369 men with chlamydial urethritis, comprising 314 and 55 treated with the azithromycin-SR regimen and the sitafloxacin regimen, respectively. Alleles 1 and/or 2 of the 23S rRNA gene were analyzed in 162 specimens. No mutations were found in the sequenced regions, including the central portion of domain V. The gyrA and parC genes were analyzed in 118 and 113 specimens, respectively. No amino acid changes were found within the quinolone resistance-determining region of the gyrA gene and in the sequenced region of the parC gene. The microbiological outcomes of the azithromycin-SR and sitafloxacin regimens were assessed in 176 and 30 men, respectively. The eradication rates were 96.0% (95% CI 93.1%-98.9%) for the azithromycin-SR regimen and 100% for the sitafloxacin regimen. Clinical strains of C. trachomatis with macrolide and/or fluoroquinolone resistance would be uncommon, and azithromycin or fluoroquinolone regimens could be recommended as treatments for chlamydial infections. Topics: Acute Disease; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azithromycin; Chlamydia Infections; Chlamydia trachomatis; DNA Gyrase; DNA Mutational Analysis; DNA Topoisomerase IV; DNA, Bacterial; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Fluoroquinolones; Humans; Male; RNA, Ribosomal, 23S; Treatment Outcome; Urethritis | 2018 |
Haemophilus influenzae Isolated From Men With Acute Urethritis: Its Pathogenic Roles, Responses to Antimicrobial Chemotherapies, and Antimicrobial Susceptibilities.
There have been few comprehensive studies on Haemophilus influenza-positive urethritis.. In this retrospective study, we enrolled 68 men with H. influenzae-positive urethritis, including coinfections with Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis, and/or genital mycoplasmas: 2, 3, 20, and 43 treated with ceftriaxone, levofloxacin, sitafloxacin, and extended-release azithromycin (azithromycin-SR), respectively. We assessed microbiological outcomes in 54 men and clinical outcomes in 46 with H. influenzae-positive monomicrobial nongonococcal urethritis. We determined minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of 6 antimicrobial agents for 59 pretreatment isolates.. H. influenzae was eradicated from the men treated with ceftriaxone, levofloxacin, or sitafloxacin. The eradication rate with azithromycin-SR was 85.3%. The disappearance or alleviation of urethritis symptoms and the decreases in leukocyte counts in first-voided urine were significantly associated with the eradication of H. influenzae after treatment. For the isolates, ceftriaxone, levofloxacin, sitafloxacin, azithromycin, tetracycline, and doxycycline MICs were ≤0.008-0.25, 0.008-0.5, 0.001-0.008, 0.12-1, 0.25-16, and 0.25-2 μg/mL, respectively. The azithromycin MICs for 3 of 4 strains persisting after azithromycin-SR administration were 1 μg/mL. H. influenzae with an azithromycin MIC of 1 μg/mL increased chronologically.. H. influenzae showed good responses to the chemotherapies for urethritis. The significant associations of the clinical outcomes of the chemotherapies with their microbiological outcomes suggested that H. influenzae could play pathogenic roles in urethritis. All isolates, except for one with decreased susceptibility to tetracyclines, were susceptible to the examined agents. However, the increase in H. influenzae with an azithromycin MIC of 1 μg/mL might threaten efficacies of azithromycin regimens on H. influenzae-positive urethritis. Topics: Acute Disease; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azithromycin; Ceftriaxone; Chlamydia Infections; Chlamydia trachomatis; Coinfection; Doxycycline; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Fluoroquinolones; Gonorrhea; Haemophilus influenzae; Humans; Leukocyte Count; Levofloxacin; Male; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Neisseria gonorrhoeae; Retrospective Studies; Urethritis | 2017 |
Microbiological and Clinical Effects of Sitafloxacin and Azithromycin in Periodontitis Patients Receiving Supportive Periodontal Therapy.
Sitafloxacin (STFX) is a newly developed quinolone that has robust antimicrobial activity against periodontopathic bacteria. We previously reported that oral administration of STFX during supportive periodontal therapy was as effective as conventional mechanical debridement under local anesthesia microbiologically and clinically for 3 months. The aim of the present study was to examine the short-term and long-term microbiological and clinical effects of systemic STFX and azithromycin (AZM) on active periodontal pockets during supportive periodontal therapy. Fifty-one patients receiving supportive periodontal therapy were randomly allocated to the STFX group (200 mg/day of STFX for 5 days) or the AZM group (500 mg/day of AZM for 3 days). The microbiological and clinical parameters were examined until 12 months after the systemic administration of each drug. The concentration of each drug in periodontal pockets and the antimicrobial susceptibility of clinical isolates were also analyzed. The proportions of red complex bacteria, i.e., Porphyromonas gingivalis, Treponema denticola, and Tannerella forsythia, which are the representative periodontopathic bacteria, were significantly reduced at 1 month and remained lower at 12 months than those at baseline in both the STFX and AZM groups. Clinical parameters were significantly improved over the 12-month period in both groups. An increase in the MIC of AZM against clinical isolates was observed in the AZM group. These results indicate that monotherapy with systemic STFX and AZM might be an alternative treatment during supportive periodontal therapy in patients for whom invasive mechanical treatment is inappropriate. (This study has been registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network-Clinical Trials Registry [UMIN-CTR] under registration number UMIN000007834.). Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azithromycin; Female; Fluoroquinolones; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Periodontal Pocket; Periodontitis; Periodontium; Porphyromonas gingivalis; Tannerella forsythia; Treponema denticola | 2016 |
Antimicrobial efficacies of several antibiotics against uterine cervicitis caused by Mycoplasma genitalium.
Mycoplasma genitalium has been shown to be one of the pathogens responsible for uterine cervicitis by many studies. However, there are no clinical recommendations for treating M. genitalium-positive uterine cervicitis. Our study retrospectively investigated the antimicrobial efficacies of several antibiotics against uterine cervicitis caused by M. genitalium. We studied a total of 257 women with M. genitalium-positive uterine cervicitis, except for those with chlamydial and gonococcal infections, who were treated with one of the following antibacterial therapies: azithromycin extended release formulation (AZM-SR) 2 g single dose, azithromycin (AZM) 1 g single dose, clarithromycin (CAM) 400 mg/day for 7 days, CAM 400 mg/day for 14 days, moxifloxacin (MFLX) 400 mg/day for 7 days, MFLX 400 mg/day for 14 days, levofloxacin (LVFX) 500 mg/day for 7 days, LVFX 500 mg/day for 14 days, sitafloxacin (STFX) 200 mg/day for 7 days, and STFX 200 mg/day for 14 days. A PCR-based assay was performed to evaluate the microbiological efficacy of eradication in these patients. M. genitalium was eradicated from the uterine cervix in 19 of the 21 (90.5%) patients treated with AZM-SR 2 g single dose, in 38 of the 42 (90.5%) patients treated with MFLX 400 mg/day for 7 days, in 42 of the 42 (100%) patients treated with MFLX 400 mg/day for 14 days, and in 12 of the 13 (92.3%) patients treated with STFX 200 mg/day for 14 days. In conclusion, AZM-SR 2 g single dose, MFLX 400 mg/day for 14 days, and STFX 200 mg/day for 14 days would each be an effective treatment for M. genitalium infection. Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Aza Compounds; Azithromycin; Female; Fluoroquinolones; Humans; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Moxifloxacin; Mycoplasma genitalium; Mycoplasma Infections; Polymerase Chain Reaction; Quinolines; Retrospective Studies; Uterine Cervicitis | 2012 |