zithromax and fexofenadine

Significant cardiac toxicity has been associated with some older antihistamines (eg, terfenadine and astemizole) when their plasma concentrations are increased. There is thus a need for a thorough assessment of the cardiac safety of newer antihistamine compounds.. This study was undertaken to assess the effects of coadministration of desloratadine or fexofenadine with azithromycin on pharmacokinetic parameters, tolerability, and electrocardiographic (ECG) findings.. Healthy volunteers aged 19 to 46 years participated in this randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, third-party-blind, multiple-dose study. Subjects received desloratadine 5 mg once daily, fexofenadine 60 mg twice daily, or placebo for 7 days. An azithromycin loading dose (500 mg) followed by azithromycin 250 mg once daily for 4 days was administered concomitantly starting on day 3. Group 1 received desloratadine and azithromycin, group 2 received desloratadine and placebo, group 3 received placebo and azithromycin, group 4 received fexofenadine and azithromycin, and group 5 received fexofenadine and placebo.. The results of the pharmacokinetic analysis revealed little change in mean maximum concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) values for desloratadine with concomitant administration of azithromycin: Cmax ratio, 115% (90% CI, 92-144); AUC, ratio 105% (90% CI, 82-134). The corresponding ratios for 3-hydroxydesloratadine were 115% (90% CI, 98-136) and 104% (90% CI, 88-122), respectively. A substantial increase was observed in mean Cmax and AUC values for fexofenadine when administered with azithromycin: Cmax, ratio, 169% (90% CI, 120-237); AUC ratio, 167% (90% CI, 122-229). Compared with the group receiving desloratadine and azithromycin, subjects receiving fexofenadine and azithromycin also displayed greater variability in pharmacokinetic parameters for the antihistamine. Mean Cmax and AUC values of azithromycin were slightly higher when administered with desloratadine (Cmax ratio, 131% [90% CI, 92-187]; AUC ratio, 112% [90% CI, 83-153]) but were lower when given in combination with fexofenadine (Cmax ratio, 87% [90% CI, 61-124]; AUC ratio, 88% [90% CI, 65-1201). The most common adverse event for all regimens was headache, reported in 20 (22%) subjects. All combinations of desloratadine or fexofenadine with and without azithromycin were well tolerated, and no statistically significant changes in PR, QT, or QT, interval, QRS complex, or ventricular rate were observed.. Small increases (<15%) in mean pharmacokinetics of desloratadine were observed with coadministration of azithromycin. By contrast, peak fexofenadine concentrations were increased by 69% and the AUC was increased by 67% in the presence of the azalide antibiotic. Based on the reported adverse-events profile and the absence of changes in ECG parameters, the combination of desloratadine and azithromycin was well tolerated. This study suggests that desloratadine has a more favorable drug-interaction potential than does fexofenadine.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azithromycin; Electrocardiography; Female; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Humans; Loratadine; Male; Middle Aged; Terfenadine

Macrolide antibiotics azithromycin (AZI) and clarithromycin (CLARI) are large molecular weight compounds and are substrates for apically polarized efflux transporters such as P-glycoprotein, which can potentially restrict intestinal absorption. However, despite these undesired physicochemical and biopharmaceutical properties, AZI and CLARI exhibit moderate to excellent p.o. bioavailability in preclinical species and humans. Intestinal uptake transporters, such as organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATPs), can facilitate the uptake of drugs that are substrates and hence increase p.o. absorption. The present study was designed to determine whether the intestinal Oatps are involved in absorption of these macrolides. AZI or CLARI was dosed p.o. to Sprague-Dawley rats after p.o. administration with vehicle or rifamycin SV (RIF), an OATP inhibitor. The p.o. exposures of AZI and CLARI were reduced 65 and 45%, respectively, when coadministered with an optimized RIF regimen. The p.o. RIF had no affect on the total blood clearance of these macrolides and most likely did not cause induction of metabolizing enzymes and/or transporters. Therefore, the results suggest that inhibition of an RIF-sensitive uptake transporter such as Oatp along the rat gastrointestinal tract was responsible for reduced p.o. exposure of AZI and CLARI. In addition, AZI and CLARI caused inhibition of taurocholate uptake in rat Oatp1a5-transfected Madin-Darby canine kidney cell monolayers. The in vitro and in vivo results suggest that the intestinal Oatps are involved in the p.o. absorption of AZI and CLARI in the rat.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Animals; Antirheumatic Agents; Area Under Curve; Azithromycin; Biological Transport, Active; Cell Line; Clarithromycin; Dogs; Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating; Infusions, Intravenous; Intestinal Absorption; Male; Organic Anion Transporters; Organic Anion Transporters, Sodium-Independent; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Rifamycins; Taurocholic Acid; Terfenadine; Transfection