zithromax has been researched along with efavirenz* in 2 studies
1 trial(s) available for zithromax and efavirenz
Article | Year |
---|---|
Ibrutinib Dosing Strategies Based on Interaction Potential of CYP3A4 Perpetrators Using Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling.
Based on ibrutinib pharmacokinetics and potential sensitivity towards CYP3A4-mediated drug-drug interactions (DDIs), a physiologically based pharmacokinetic approach was developed to mechanistically describe DDI with various CYP3A4 perpetrators in healthy men under fasting conditions. These models were verified using clinical data for ketoconazole (strong CYP3A4 inhibitor) and used to prospectively predict and confirm the inducing effect of rifampin (strong CYP3A4 inducer); DDIs with mild (fluvoxamine, azithromycin) and moderate inhibitors (diltiazem, voriconazole, clarithromycin, itraconazole, erythromycin), and moderate (efavirenz) and strong CYP3A4 inducers (carbamazepine), were also predicted. Ketoconazole increased ibrutinib area under the curve (AUC) by 24-fold, while rifampin decreased ibrutinib AUC by 10-fold; coadministration of ibrutinib with strong inhibitors or inducers should be avoided. The ibrutinib dose should be reduced to 140 mg (quarter of maximal prescribed dose) when coadministered with moderate CYP3A4 inhibitors so that exposures remain within observed ranges at therapeutic doses. Thus, dose recommendations for CYP3A4 perpetrator use during ibrutinib treatment were developed and approved for labeling. Topics: Adenine; Alkynes; Azithromycin; Benzoxazines; Carbamazepine; Cyclopropanes; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A Inducers; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A Inhibitors; Drug Dosage Calculations; Drug Interactions; Fluvoxamine; Humans; Ketoconazole; Male; Models, Biological; Piperidines; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Rifampin | 2016 |
1 other study(ies) available for zithromax and efavirenz
Article | Year |
---|---|
Comparative Oral Drug Classification Systems: Acetazolamide, Azithromycin, Clopidogrel, and Efavirenz Case Studies.
Biopharmaceutics classification systems based on the properties of solubility and permeability or the extension of metabolism are very important tools in the early stages of the development and regulatory stages of new products. However, until now, there was no clear understanding between the interplay among these classification systems. Therefore, the main objective of this work was to make a comparison of concepts of BCS and BDDCS to understand what are the key factors that allow for the integration of these biopharmaceutics classification systems. Also, the suitability of an in situ single-pass intestinal perfusion assay in rats (SPIP) development was assessed by us to determine the limit between high and low permeability following what the FDA BCS guidance suggests. An excellent correlation was found between the values of permeability obtained by applying SPIP assays and the extensions of the metabolism of the set of compounds studied in this work, with the exception of three compounds that showed disparity between their permeability coefficients ( P Topics: Acetazolamide; Administration, Oral; Alkynes; Animals; Azithromycin; Benzoxazines; Biological Assay; Biological Availability; Biopharmaceutics; Clopidogrel; Cyclopropanes; Drug Evaluation, Preclinical; Feasibility Studies; Intestinal Absorption; Intestinal Mucosa; Perfusion; Permeability; Rats; Solubility | 2018 |