zd-6126 and vadimezan

Vascular disrupting agents (VDAs) have presented a new kind of anti-cancer drug in recent years. VDAs take advantage of the weakness of established tumor endothelial cells and their supporting structures. In contrast to anti-angiogenic therapy, which inhibits the outgrowth of new blood vessels, vascular targeting treatments selectively attack the existing tumor vasculature. Here we summarized the anti-tumor activities, mechanisms and clinical applications of small molecule VDAs.

Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Bibenzyls; Diphosphates; Endothelial Cells; Humans; Molecular Structure; Neoplasms; Neovascularization, Pathologic; Oligopeptides; Organophosphorus Compounds; Serine; Stilbenes; Tubulin Modulators; Xanthones

Growth of human tumours depends on the supply of oxygen and nutrients via the surrounding vasculature. Therefore tumour vasculature is an attractive target for anticancer therapy. Apart from angiogenesis inhibitors that compromise the formation of new blood vessels, a second class of specific anticancer drugs has been developed. These so-called vascular disrupting agents (VDAs) target the established tumour vasculature and cause an acute and pronounced shutdown of blood vessels resulting in an almost complete stop of blood flow, ultimately leading to selective tumour necrosis. As a number of VDAs are now being tested in clinical studies, we will discuss their mechanism of action and the results obtained in preclinical studies. Also data from clinical studies will be reviewed and some considerations with regard to the future development are given.

Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Blood Vessels; Humans; Neoplasms; Neovascularization, Pathologic; Oligopeptides; Organophosphorus Compounds; Regional Blood Flow; Stilbenes; Tubulin Modulators; Xanthones

Novel anticancer compounds are being developed that attempt to exploit the unique properties of the vascular endothelium, which supplies rapidly dividing neoplasms. The goal of these vascular targeting agents (VTAs) or endothelial disrupting agents is to cause rapid shutdown of tumor blood supply with subsequent tumor death from hypoxia and nutrient deprivation. VTAs are classified into two broad categories: biologic therapies or small molecule compounds. A variety of VTAs are in early clinical development. These agents have demonstrated clinical activity in phase I trials and are being evaluated with cytotoxic chemotherapy and radiotherapy.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Endothelium, Vascular; Humans; Neoplasms; Organophosphorus Compounds; Stilbenes; Xanthones

With recent Food and Drug Administration approval of the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) antibody for the treatment of colon cancer, it may be possible to achieve similar progress in the treatment of locally advanced lung cancer. Antiangiogenic therapies in the clinic are a reality, and it is important to demonstrate that they can be used safely with conventional modalities, including radiation therapy (RT). Strategies under scrutiny in preclinical and clinical studies include the use of endogenous inhibitors of angiogenesis, use of agents that target VEGF and VEGF receptor signaling, targeting endothelial-related integrins during angiogenesis, and targeting the preexisting immature vessels growing within tumors (ie, vascular targeting). Regardless of the approach, it is necessary to address whether angiogenesis is a consistent phenomenon within the lung parenchyma around a cancer and a relevant target and whether inhibiting angiogenesis will improve current lung cancer therapies without increasing toxicity. Vascular-targeting agents (VTAs) are an interesting class of agents that have the potential to enhance RT, but their clinical promise has yet to be realized. In preclinical models, these agents selectively destroy the tumor vasculature, initiating a rapid centralized necrosis within established tumors. Characteristically, after treatment with VTAs, a rim of viable tumor cells remains at the periphery of the tumor, which remains well perfused and should therefore be relatively sensitive to radiation-induced cytotoxicity. This review will focus on VTAs in the treatment of lung cancer and includes a discussion of combination studies with RT in the laboratory and some of the hurdles in the clinical application of these agents.

Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Combined Modality Therapy; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Neovascularization, Pathologic; Organophosphorus Compounds; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factors; Xanthones

Vascular targeting agents (VTAs) for the treatment of cancer are designed to cause a rapid and selective shutdown of the blood vessels of tumors. Unlike antiangiogenic drugs that inhibit the formation of new vessels, VTAs occlude the pre-existing blood vessels of tumors to cause tumor cell death from ischemia and extensive hemorrhagic necrosis. Tumor selectivity is conferred by differences in the pathophysiology of tumor versus normal tissue vessels (e.g., increased proliferation and fragility, and up-regulated proteins). VTAs can kill indirectly the tumor cells that are resistant to conventional antiproliferative cancer therapies, i.e., cells in areas distant from blood vessels where drug penetration is poor, and hypoxia can lead to radiation and drug resistance. VTAs are expected to show the greatest therapeutic benefit as part of combined modality regimens. Preclinical studies have shown VTA-induced enhancement of the effects of conventional chemotherapeutic agents, radiation, hyperthermia, radioimmunotherapy, and antiangiogenic agents. There are broadly two types of VTAs, small molecules and ligand-based, which are grouped together, because they both cause acute vascular shutdown in tumors leading to massive necrosis. The small molecules include the microtubulin destabilizing drugs, combretastatin A-4 disodium phosphate, ZD6126, AVE8062, and Oxi 4503, and the flavonoid, DMXAA. Ligand-based VTAs use antibodies, peptides, or growth factors that bind selectively to tumor versus normal vessels to target tumors with agents that occlude blood vessels. The ligand-based VTAs include fusion proteins (e.g., vascular endothelial growth factor linked to the plant toxin gelonin), immunotoxins (e.g., monoclonal antibodies to endoglin conjugated to ricin A), antibodies linked to cytokines, liposomally encapsulated drugs, and gene therapy approaches. Combretastatin A-4 disodium phosphate, ZD6126, AVE8062, and DMXAA are undergoing clinical evaluation. Phase I monotherapy studies have shown that the agents are tolerated with some demonstration of single agent efficacy. Because efficacy is expected when the agents are used with conventional chemotherapeutic drugs or radiation, the results of Phase II combination studies are eagerly awaited.

Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Cell Division; Clinical Trials as Topic; Diphosphates; Genetic Therapy; Humans; Hypoxia; Immunotoxins; Ligands; Models, Biological; Necrosis; Neoplasms; Organophosphorus Compounds; Peptides; Radioimmunotherapy; Stilbenes; Time Factors; Up-Regulation; Xanthones

Tumor endothelium represents a valuable target for cancer therapy. The vasculature plays a critical role in the survival and continued growth of solid tumor masses; in addition, the inherent differences between tumor blood vessels and blood vessels associated with normal tissue make the tumor vasculature a unique target on which to base the design of novel therapeutics, which may allow highly selective treatment of malignant disease. Therapeutic strategies that target and disrupt the already formed vessel networks of growing tumors are actively being pursued. The goal of these approaches is to induce a rapid and catastrophic shutdown of the vascular function of the tumor so that blood flow is arrested and tumor cell death due to the resulting oxygen and nutrient deprivation and buildup of waste products occurs.. Biologic approaches and small-molecule drugs that can be used to damage tumor vasculature have been identified. Physiologic, histologic/morphologic, and immunohistochemical assessments have demonstrated that profound disruption of the tumor vessel network can be observed minutes to hours after treatment. The small-molecule agents that have made the greatest advances in the clinical setting (5,6-dimethylxanthenone-4-acetic acid [DMXAA], combretastatin A4 disodium phosphate [CA4DP], and ZD6126) are the focus of the current review.. Loss of patent blood vessels, decreased tumor blood flow, extensive necrosis, and secondary ischemia-induced tumor cell death have been well documented in a variety of preclinical tumor models treated with agents such as DMXAA, CA4DP, and ZD6126. The use of such agents in conjunction with irradiation and other chemotherapeutic agents has led to improved treatment outcomes.. The targeting of tumors' supportive blood vessel networks could lead to improvements in cancer cure rates. It is likely that this approach will prove to be most efficacious when used in concert with conventional treatment strategies.

Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Animals; Clinical Trials as Topic; Combined Modality Therapy; Endothelium, Vascular; Neoplasms, Experimental; Organophosphorus Compounds; Stilbenes; Xanthones

The tumor vessel support network offers a tantalizing target for cancer therapy, given the complete dependence of a solid neoplasia on the vasculature for both the delivery of oxygen and other nutrients, as well as the effective removal of wasteproducts. Attacking a tumor's supportive blood vessel network offers ameans of improving cancer cure rates on the basis of two principles. The first reflects evidence indicating that physiological conditions in tumors, arising primarily as a consequence of inadequate and non-uniform vascular networks, are significant contributors to resistance to non-surgical anticancer treatments. The second involves the recognition that the inherent differences between blood vessels in tumors and those associated with normal tissues provide a variety of unique targets for the design of novel therapeutics, highly selective for neoplastic growth. Therapeutic approaches that aim to destroy the tumor endothelium are being actively pursued. The application of such vascular targeting strategies as adjuvants to conventional therapeutics such as radiotherapy, offers unique opportunities to develop even more effective cancer therapies.

Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Drug Delivery Systems; Humans; Neovascularization, Pathologic; Organophosphorus Compounds; Xanthenes; Xanthones

Vascular-disrupting agents (VDAs) represent a new class of chemotherapeutic agent that targets the existing vasculature in solid tumors. Preclinical and early-phase trials have demonstrated the promising therapeutic benefits of VDAs but have also uncovered a distinctive toxicity profile highlighted by cardiovascular events.. We reviewed all preclinical and prospective phase I-III clinical trials published up to August 2010 in MEDLINE and the American Association of Cancer Research and American Society of Clinical Oncology meeting abstracts of small-molecule VDAs, including combretastatin A4 phosphate (CA4P), combretastatin A1 phosphate (CA1P), MPC-6827, ZD6126, AVE8062, and ASA404.. Phase I and II studies of CA1P, ASA404, MPC-6827, and CA4P all reported cardiovascular toxicities, with the most common cardiac events being National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (version 3) grade 1-3 hypertension, tachyarrhythmias and bradyarrhythmias, atrial fibrillation, and myocardial infarction. Cardiac events were dose-limiting toxicities in phase I trials with VDA monotherapy and combination therapy.. Early-phase trials of VDAs have revealed a cardiovascular toxicity profile similar to that of their vascular-targeting counterparts, the angiogenesis inhibitors. As these agents are added to the mainstream chemotherapeutic arsenal, careful identification of baseline cardiovascular risk factors would seem to be a prudent strategy. Close collaboration with cardiology colleagues for early indicators of serious cardiac adverse events will likely minimize toxicity while optimizing the therapeutic potential of VDAs and ultimately enhancing patient outcomes.

Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Bibenzyls; Cardiovascular System; Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Neoplasms; Neovascularization, Pathologic; Organophosphorus Compounds; Quinazolines; Serine; Xanthones

We investigated the influence of two types of vascular damaging agents (VDAs) (DMXAA vs. ZD6126) and sequence of administration (VDA 24 h before HYP vs. HYP 1 h before VDA) to evaluate the effect on hypericin (HYP) accumulation and distribution in necrotic tumors.. Frozen sections of dorsally inoculated RIF-1 tumors were analyzed by fluorescence microscopy and H&E stained for histological evaluation. The localization of HYP was assessed both qualitatively and semi-quantitatively in necrotic tumor, viable tumor, or nontarget host tissue.. Whereas the type of VDA did not influence HYP accumulation and distribution, a clear advantage could be seen when administering VDA 24 h before HYP compared to HYP 1 h before VDA, pointing toward the absence of a "trapping" mechanism. In DMXAA-treated and not in ZD6126-treated tumors, spotty fluorescence was observed which is likely to be a consequence of neutrophil phagocytosis. Dexamethasone treatment neither did influence this phenomenon nor did change HYP uptake in necrotic tumor.. We conclude that HYP accumulation is optimal when it is administered after VDA injection. We also found that HYP accumulation in necrosis is not changed when using VDAs with different working mechanisms. This insight provides a rationale for tumor necrosis therapy (TNT) using iodine-131-labeled hypericin ([(131)I]-HYP) in combination with VDAs.

Topics: Animals; Anthracenes; Antineoplastic Agents; Cell Line, Tumor; Mice; Mice, Inbred C3H; Necrosis; Neoplasms; Neovascularization, Pathologic; Organophosphorus Compounds; Perylene; Telomere-Binding Proteins; Xanthones

The aim of this study was to use magnetic resonance (MR) techniques to non-invasively compare the effects of the three leading vascular disrupting agents, namely combretastatin A-4 disodium phosphate (CA4DP), 5,6-dimethylxanthenone-4-acetic acid (DMXAA) and ZD6126. A C3H mouse mammary carcinoma grown in the right rear foot of female CDF1 mice was used and treatments performed when tumours had reached 200 mm3 in volume. Drugs were prepared fresh before each experiment and intraperitoneally injected into restrained non-anaesthetised mice. Tumour response was evaluated using 31P-MR spectroscopy and T1- and T2- weighted imaging with a 7-Tesla, horizontal bore magnet, before and up to 24 hours after treatment. All three drugs significantly decreased bioenergetic status and pH, and did so in a time and dose dependent fashion, but there were differences; the decrease by CA4DP occurred more rapidly than for DMXAA or ZD6126, while DMXAA had a narrow window of activity compared to CA4DP and ZD6126. Changes in T1 weighted images for all three agents suggested a dose dependent increase in tumour oedema within three hours after treatment, consistent with an increase in vessel permeability. Using T2 weighted images there was some evidence of haemorrhagic necrosis by DMXAA, but such necrosis was limited following treatment with CA4DP or ZD6126.

Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Female; Hydrogen-Ion Concentration; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy; Mammary Neoplasms, Animal; Mice; Mice, Inbred C3H; Nucleosides; Organophosphorus Compounds; Phosphates; Stilbenes; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Xanthones