zd-6126 and fosbretabulin

Growth of human tumours depends on the supply of oxygen and nutrients via the surrounding vasculature. Therefore tumour vasculature is an attractive target for anticancer therapy. Apart from angiogenesis inhibitors that compromise the formation of new blood vessels, a second class of specific anticancer drugs has been developed. These so-called vascular disrupting agents (VDAs) target the established tumour vasculature and cause an acute and pronounced shutdown of blood vessels resulting in an almost complete stop of blood flow, ultimately leading to selective tumour necrosis. As a number of VDAs are now being tested in clinical studies, we will discuss their mechanism of action and the results obtained in preclinical studies. Also data from clinical studies will be reviewed and some considerations with regard to the future development are given.

Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Blood Vessels; Humans; Neoplasms; Neovascularization, Pathologic; Oligopeptides; Organophosphorus Compounds; Regional Blood Flow; Stilbenes; Tubulin Modulators; Xanthones

Angiogenesis is critical for a number of physiologic and pathophysiologic processes, and angiogenesis inhibitors are now being used in the treatment of cancer. Although antiangiogenic agents offer great therapeutic potential, preclinical and clinical trial results suggest that these agents will have a delayed onset of activity and may only induce disease stabilization for patients with advanced malignancy. The use of radiation therapy for cancer is also associated with therapeutic challenges that are distinct from those that might be expected with antiangiogenic agents. Thus, the use of angiogenesis inhibitors in combination with radiation therapy should help to overcome the limitations of each leading to enhanced efficacy and diminished toxicity. The goal of this review is to provide an overview and discussion of the combination of angiogenesis inhibitors with radiation therapy.

Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic; Combined Modality Therapy; Humans; Neoplasms; Organophosphorus Compounds; Stilbenes; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A

Novel anticancer compounds are being developed that attempt to exploit the unique properties of the vascular endothelium, which supplies rapidly dividing neoplasms. The goal of these vascular targeting agents (VTAs) or endothelial disrupting agents is to cause rapid shutdown of tumor blood supply with subsequent tumor death from hypoxia and nutrient deprivation. VTAs are classified into two broad categories: biologic therapies or small molecule compounds. A variety of VTAs are in early clinical development. These agents have demonstrated clinical activity in phase I trials and are being evaluated with cytotoxic chemotherapy and radiotherapy.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Endothelium, Vascular; Humans; Neoplasms; Organophosphorus Compounds; Stilbenes; Xanthones

Vascular targeting agents (VTAs) for the treatment of cancer are designed to cause a rapid and selective shutdown of the blood vessels of tumors. Unlike antiangiogenic drugs that inhibit the formation of new vessels, VTAs occlude the pre-existing blood vessels of tumors to cause tumor cell death from ischemia and extensive hemorrhagic necrosis. Tumor selectivity is conferred by differences in the pathophysiology of tumor versus normal tissue vessels (e.g., increased proliferation and fragility, and up-regulated proteins). VTAs can kill indirectly the tumor cells that are resistant to conventional antiproliferative cancer therapies, i.e., cells in areas distant from blood vessels where drug penetration is poor, and hypoxia can lead to radiation and drug resistance. VTAs are expected to show the greatest therapeutic benefit as part of combined modality regimens. Preclinical studies have shown VTA-induced enhancement of the effects of conventional chemotherapeutic agents, radiation, hyperthermia, radioimmunotherapy, and antiangiogenic agents. There are broadly two types of VTAs, small molecules and ligand-based, which are grouped together, because they both cause acute vascular shutdown in tumors leading to massive necrosis. The small molecules include the microtubulin destabilizing drugs, combretastatin A-4 disodium phosphate, ZD6126, AVE8062, and Oxi 4503, and the flavonoid, DMXAA. Ligand-based VTAs use antibodies, peptides, or growth factors that bind selectively to tumor versus normal vessels to target tumors with agents that occlude blood vessels. The ligand-based VTAs include fusion proteins (e.g., vascular endothelial growth factor linked to the plant toxin gelonin), immunotoxins (e.g., monoclonal antibodies to endoglin conjugated to ricin A), antibodies linked to cytokines, liposomally encapsulated drugs, and gene therapy approaches. Combretastatin A-4 disodium phosphate, ZD6126, AVE8062, and DMXAA are undergoing clinical evaluation. Phase I monotherapy studies have shown that the agents are tolerated with some demonstration of single agent efficacy. Because efficacy is expected when the agents are used with conventional chemotherapeutic drugs or radiation, the results of Phase II combination studies are eagerly awaited.

Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Cell Division; Clinical Trials as Topic; Diphosphates; Genetic Therapy; Humans; Hypoxia; Immunotoxins; Ligands; Models, Biological; Necrosis; Neoplasms; Organophosphorus Compounds; Peptides; Radioimmunotherapy; Stilbenes; Time Factors; Up-Regulation; Xanthones

Tumor endothelium represents a valuable target for cancer therapy. The vasculature plays a critical role in the survival and continued growth of solid tumor masses; in addition, the inherent differences between tumor blood vessels and blood vessels associated with normal tissue make the tumor vasculature a unique target on which to base the design of novel therapeutics, which may allow highly selective treatment of malignant disease. Therapeutic strategies that target and disrupt the already formed vessel networks of growing tumors are actively being pursued. The goal of these approaches is to induce a rapid and catastrophic shutdown of the vascular function of the tumor so that blood flow is arrested and tumor cell death due to the resulting oxygen and nutrient deprivation and buildup of waste products occurs.. Biologic approaches and small-molecule drugs that can be used to damage tumor vasculature have been identified. Physiologic, histologic/morphologic, and immunohistochemical assessments have demonstrated that profound disruption of the tumor vessel network can be observed minutes to hours after treatment. The small-molecule agents that have made the greatest advances in the clinical setting (5,6-dimethylxanthenone-4-acetic acid [DMXAA], combretastatin A4 disodium phosphate [CA4DP], and ZD6126) are the focus of the current review.. Loss of patent blood vessels, decreased tumor blood flow, extensive necrosis, and secondary ischemia-induced tumor cell death have been well documented in a variety of preclinical tumor models treated with agents such as DMXAA, CA4DP, and ZD6126. The use of such agents in conjunction with irradiation and other chemotherapeutic agents has led to improved treatment outcomes.. The targeting of tumors' supportive blood vessel networks could lead to improvements in cancer cure rates. It is likely that this approach will prove to be most efficacious when used in concert with conventional treatment strategies.

Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Animals; Clinical Trials as Topic; Combined Modality Therapy; Endothelium, Vascular; Neoplasms, Experimental; Organophosphorus Compounds; Stilbenes; Xanthones

We sought to compare the therapeutic efficacy between two vascular-disrupting agents, combretastatin A4 phosphate (CA4P) and ZD6126, at a clinically relevant dose on tumor models with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Thirty rats with liver rhabdomyosarcoma were randomized into CA4P (10 mg/kg), ZD6126 (10 mg/kg), and control group (n=10 for each group). Multiparametric MRI biomarkers including tumor volume, enhancement ratio, necrosis ratio, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and K (volume transfer constant) derived from T2-weighted, T1-weighted, contrast-enhanced T1-weighted, and diffusion-weighted imaging, and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI were compared at pretreatment, 1 h, 6 h, 24 h, 48 h, and 120 h posttreatment; they were validated using ex-vivo techniques. Relative to rapidly growing tumors without necrosis in control rats, tumors grew slower in the CA4P group compared with the ZD6126 group with a higher necrosis ratio at 120 h (P<0.05), as proven by histopathology. In the CA4P group, K decreased from 1 h until 6 h, and partially recovered at 120 h. In the ZD6126 group, the reduced K at 1 h began to rebound from 6 h and exceeded the baseline value at 120 h (P<0.05), parallel to evolving enhancement ratios (P<0.05). ADC revealed more necrotic tumors with CA4P versus ZD6126 at 120 h (P<0.05). The different tumor responses were confirmed by ex-vivo microangiography and histopathology. CA4P was more effective than ZD6126 in impairing blood supply, inducing necrosis, and delaying growth in rat liver tumors at a clinically relevant dose. A single dose of vascular-disrupting agent was insufficient to destroy the tumor. The multiparametric MRI biomarkers enabled in-vivo noninvasive comparison of therapeutic efficacy between CA4P and ZD6126.

Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic; Biomarkers, Tumor; Contrast Media; Drug Screening Assays, Antitumor; Injections, Intravenous; Liver Neoplasms, Experimental; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Microvessels; Necrosis; Organophosphorus Compounds; Rats; Rats, Inbred Strains; Rhabdomyosarcoma; Stilbenes; Tumor Burden

The aim of this study was to use magnetic resonance (MR) techniques to non-invasively compare the effects of the three leading vascular disrupting agents, namely combretastatin A-4 disodium phosphate (CA4DP), 5,6-dimethylxanthenone-4-acetic acid (DMXAA) and ZD6126. A C3H mouse mammary carcinoma grown in the right rear foot of female CDF1 mice was used and treatments performed when tumours had reached 200 mm3 in volume. Drugs were prepared fresh before each experiment and intraperitoneally injected into restrained non-anaesthetised mice. Tumour response was evaluated using 31P-MR spectroscopy and T1- and T2- weighted imaging with a 7-Tesla, horizontal bore magnet, before and up to 24 hours after treatment. All three drugs significantly decreased bioenergetic status and pH, and did so in a time and dose dependent fashion, but there were differences; the decrease by CA4DP occurred more rapidly than for DMXAA or ZD6126, while DMXAA had a narrow window of activity compared to CA4DP and ZD6126. Changes in T1 weighted images for all three agents suggested a dose dependent increase in tumour oedema within three hours after treatment, consistent with an increase in vessel permeability. Using T2 weighted images there was some evidence of haemorrhagic necrosis by DMXAA, but such necrosis was limited following treatment with CA4DP or ZD6126.

Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Female; Hydrogen-Ion Concentration; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy; Mammary Neoplasms, Animal; Mice; Mice, Inbred C3H; Nucleosides; Organophosphorus Compounds; Phosphates; Stilbenes; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Xanthones