valacyclovir and letermovir

valacyclovir has been researched along with letermovir* in 2 studies

Reviews

1 review(s) available for valacyclovir and letermovir

ArticleYear
Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Different Antiviral Agents for Cytomegalovirus Prophylaxis in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, 2018, Volume: 24, Issue:10

    Over the past 25 years, several randomized controlled trials have investigated the efficacy of different antiviral agents for cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. We performed a systematic literature review, conventional meta-analysis, and network meta-analysis using a random-effects model and risk ratios (RRs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) as effect estimates. Fifteen randomized controlled trials were identified, including 7 different antiviral agents: acyclovir, ganciclovir, maribavir, brincidofovir, letermovir, valacyclovir, and vaccine. Twelve trials used placebo as comparator while 3 trials compared different antiviral agents. We found evidence for CMV disease and infection being significantly reduced by antiviral prophylaxis, with an RR of .66 (95% CI, .48 to .90) and .63 (95% CI, .50 to .79). Across the network, ganciclovir showed the best relative efficacy for CMV disease while letermovir provided first rank of being the best option for CMV infection. The risk for death was not significantly influenced by antiviral prophylaxis in the meta-analysis, with an RR of .92 (95% CI, .78 to 1.08), as well as in the network meta-analysis. In terms of safety, letermovir was at least similar in comparison with placebo and most agents while both letermovir and acyclovir showed significantly reduced risk for serious adverse events compared with ganciclovir, with RRs of .55 (95% CI, .30 to 1.00) for letermovir and .63 (95% CI, .42 to .93) for acyclovir. With a probability of 81%, letermovir appears to be the best option in terms of safety. Future randomized head-to-head comparisons are needed to evaluate the definite efficacy and safety of different prophylactic strategies.

    Topics: Acetates; Acyclovir; Allografts; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Cytomegalovirus; Cytomegalovirus Infections; Female; Ganciclovir; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Male; Quinazolines; Ribonucleosides; Risk Factors; Valacyclovir

2018

Other Studies

1 other study(ies) available for valacyclovir and letermovir

ArticleYear
Letermovir vs. high-dose valacyclovir for cytomegalovirus prophylaxis following haploidentical or mismatched unrelated donor allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation receiving post-transplant cyclophosphamide.
    Leukemia & lymphoma, 2022, Volume: 63, Issue:8

    Patients undergoing haploidentical or mismatched unrelated donor (haplo/MMUD) allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) receiving post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) are at high risk of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. Experience with letermovir (LET) in this population is limited. This single center retrospective cohort study compared CMV and transplant outcomes between LET and a historical control with high-dose valacyclovir (HDV) prophylaxis in adults undergoing haplo/MMUD alloHCT. Thirty-eight CMV seropositive patients were included, 19 in each arm. LET reduced the incidence of CMV infection (5% vs. 53%, RR 0.01, 95% CI 0.014-0.71,

    Topics: Acetates; Adult; Cyclophosphamide; Cytomegalovirus; Cytomegalovirus Infections; Graft vs Host Disease; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Quinazolines; Retrospective Studies; Unrelated Donors; Valacyclovir

2022