umirolimus and zotarolimus

The increasing use of drug eluting stents in interventional cardiology calls for assessment of their efficacy and safety, both among drug-eluting and bare-metal stents, in the context of rational decision making.. We searched for papers that compared any of the sirolimus-eluting stent, paclitaxel-eluting stent, drug- eluting stent, biodegradable stent, everolimus-eluting stent, zotarolimus-resolute eluting stent, biolimus- eluting stent, bare-metal stent and zotarolimus-eluting stent. The search was contacted through Medline, the Cochrane database, Embase, TCTMD, ClinicalTrials.gov, Clinical Trial Results, CardioSource, abstracts and presentations from major cardiovascular meetings. We also searched for further articles cited by selected papers. Furthermore, important conferences and relevant proceedings and abstracts, such as the American Heart Association, American College of Cardiology, Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics, Society of Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervention, European Society of Cardiology, and Euro-PCR, were also searched. Inclusion criteria were: randomised controlled trials (RCTs), size of study (≥100 patients), duration more than 6 months and definition of reported endpoints (target vessel revascularization, thrombosis, myocardial infarction and cardiac death). Analysis of the data was performed for short-term (less than a year) and long-term outcomes (more than a year). A mixed treatment comparison approach was utilised for the data analysis.. Based on the rankings of each treatment, a distinct difference between the 2nd and 1st generation stents was identified. We can conclude that everolimus, zotarolimus-resolute and biolimus eluting stents carry the highest probabilities of being superior for all endpoints.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic; Death; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Metals; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Paclitaxel; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sirolimus; Stents; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome

To relate late lumen loss (LLL) after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation to angiographic (BAR) and target vessel revascularization (TVR) in randomized clinical trials of DES.. We reviewed all clinical trials comparing different DES and having protocol-driven angiographic follow-up. We combined the data in a meta-regression analysis correlating LLL with BAR or TVR, with and without adjustment for diabetes mellitus, lesion length or reference vessel diameter. There were 15,846 patients in 29 trials (9 DES platforms) and 8697 had angiographic follow-up at a mean of 8 months. The mean age was 63 y, 28% were women and 33% had diabetes mellitus. Mean weighted in-segment LLL was 0.232mm (0.228-0.235mm), significantly higher in paclitaxel- and zotarolimus-eluting stents than in sirolimus-, everolimus- or biolimus-eluting stents. LLL was monotonically related to BAR (BAR=0.30×LLL+0.02, R(2)=0.53, P<0.0001) and TVR (TVR=0.20×LLL+0.02, R(2)=0.46, P<0.0001). Two thirds of patients with BAR had TVR. LLL remained significantly associated with BAR and TVR after multivariable adjustment. Reference vessel diameter and diabetes mellitus were inversely related to BAR.. LLL is a strong, monotonically related predictor of BAR and TVR. There is no evidence of threshold phenomenon in these relationships.

Topics: Aged; Angiography; Diabetes Complications; Diabetes Mellitus; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Paclitaxel; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Regression Analysis; Sirolimus

Types and characteristics of current-available drug-eluting stents(DES) are introduced in this review. Currently, DESs with agents of "limus family" are mainly used because of their efficacy and safety. Two representative performances, angiographic late loss and incidence of late acquired incomplete stent apposition, are compared between these DESs. Furthermore, patient-to-patient variation in amount of neointimal hyperplasia, which is chiefly associated with clinical outcomes, tends to be larger for the DES with larger average angiographic late loss. Thrombotic complications are unexpectedly more frequent in the DES with larger late loss within first one year according to the randomized clinical trials, however, persistent influences to vascular wall become dominant factors stent thrombosis at very late phases.

Topics: Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Antineoplastic Agents; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Paclitaxel; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sirolimus; Thrombosis

Drug-eluting stents (DES) with antiproliferative drugs attached via polymers on the stent surface have reduced in-stent restenosis and repeat revascularization compared with bare metal stent (BMS) across nearly all lesion and patient subsets. However, the small number of patients with in-stent restenosis after DES treatment still exists. Furthermore, concerns about long-term safety of DES are raised, particularly regarding the higher-than-expected late-event thrombosis. There is no doubt that the DES will continue to play a pivotal role in the treatment of coronary artery disease, yet future designs need to incorporate features that reduce thrombosis and promote endothelialization along with maintaining the efficacy. This review focuses on novel generation of DES, discussing new programs, including new antiproliferative agents, novel polymeric and non polymeric stents.

Topics: Absorbable Implants; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Thrombosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Equipment Design; Everolimus; Evidence-Based Medicine; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Polymers; Prosthesis Design; Sirolimus; Tacrolimus

Polymer-free drug-coated stents provide superior clinical outcomes to bare-metal stents in patients at high bleeding risk who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and are treated with 1 month of dual antiplatelet therapy. Data on the use of polymer-based drug-eluting stents, as compared with polymer-free drug-coated stents, in such patients are limited.. In an international, randomized, single-blind trial, we compared polymer-based zotarolimus-eluting stents with polymer-free umirolimus-coated stents in patients at high bleeding risk. After PCI, patients were treated with 1 month of dual antiplatelet therapy, followed by single antiplatelet therapy. The primary outcome was a safety composite of death from cardiac causes, myocardial infarction, or stent thrombosis at 1 year. The principal secondary outcome was target-lesion failure, an effectiveness composite of death from cardiac causes, target-vessel myocardial infarction, or clinically indicated target-lesion revascularization. Both outcomes were powered for noninferiority.. A total of 1996 patients at high bleeding risk were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive zotarolimus-eluting stents (1003 patients) or polymer-free drug-coated stents (993 patients). At 1 year, the primary outcome was observed in 169 of 988 patients (17.1%) in the zotarolimus-eluting stent group and in 164 of 969 (16.9%) in the polymer-free drug-coated stent group (risk difference, 0.2 percentage points; upper boundary of the one-sided 97.5% confidence interval [CI], 3.5; noninferiority margin, 4.1; P = 0.01 for noninferiority). The principal secondary outcome was observed in 174 patients (17.6%) in the zotarolimus-eluting stent group and in 169 (17.4%) in the polymer-free drug-coated stent group (risk difference, 0.2 percentage points; upper boundary of the one-sided 97.5% CI, 3.5; noninferiority margin, 4.4; P = 0.007 for noninferiority).. Among patients at high bleeding risk who received 1 month of dual antiplatelet therapy after PCI, use of polymer-based zotarolimus-eluting stents was noninferior to use of polymer-free drug-coated stents with regard to safety and effectiveness composite outcomes. (Funded by Medtronic; ONYX ONE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03344653.).

Topics: Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Thrombosis; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Eluting Stents; Heart Diseases; Hemorrhage; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Polymers; Prosthesis Design; Single-Blind Method; Sirolimus

There are few randomised studies concerning the optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for patients who receive a second-generation drug-eluting stent (DES). This trial aimed to investigate the safety of six-month compared with 12-month DAPT maintenance after second-generation DES implantation.. A prospective, randomised, multicentre trial was performed at 10 medical centres. The 1,368 patients included in the study received a biolimus-eluting stent (BES) or a zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES). The primary outcome measured was the composite of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), or ischaemia-driven target lesion revascularisation at the 12-month follow-up. The secondary outcome was the percentage of uncovered struts at six months in 60 patients (30 ZES, 30 BES) using optical coherence tomography (OCT) assessment. Each patient was randomly assigned to six-month (n=684) or 12-month DAPT (n=684). Major adverse cardiac events at 12 months occurred in eight patients (1.2%) in the six-month DAPT group and in four patients (0.6%) in the 12-month DAPT group (risk difference 0.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.4-1.6%; p=0.24). The upper 95% CI limit was lower than the pre-specified limit of 4% non-inferiority (p for non-inferiority <0.05). The percentage of uncovered struts was 3.16±4.30% at six months in 60 stents of 60 patients.. After second-generation DES implantation, six-month DAPT was not inferior to 12-month DAPT in terms of MACE occurrence over the 12-month follow-up period. OCT examination revealed favourable stent strut coverage at six months after stent implantation.

Topics: Aged; Aspirin; Cardiovascular Agents; Clopidogrel; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Predictive Value of Tests; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Republic of Korea; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Treatment Outcome

Durable polymers used in drug-eluting stents are considered a potential cause of hypersensitivity inflammatory response adversely affecting stent healing. Using a sequential follow-up with optical coherence tomography, we compared the differences in healing profiles of 2 drug-eluting stents with a biodegradable or durable polymer.. Sixty patients with multivessel disease were prospectively enrolled to receive both study stents, which were randomly assigned to 2 individual vessels, a Resolute Integrity zotarolimus-eluting stent with a durable BioLinx polymer and a BioMatrix NeoFlex Biolimus A9-eluting stent with a biodegradable polylactic acid polymer. Optical coherence tomography was performed at baseline, then in 5 randomly assigned monthly groups at 2 to 6 months, and at 9 months in all patients. The primary end point was the difference in optical coherence tomography strut coverage at 9 months. Key secondary end points included angiographic late lumen loss and composite major adverse cardiac events (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization, and definite or probable stent thrombosis) at 9 months. Resolute Integrity zotarolimus-eluting stent showed significantly better strut coverage than BioMatrix NeoFlex Biolimus A9-eluting stent at 2 to 6 months (. Despite having a durable polymer, Resolute Integrity zotarolimus-eluting stent exhibited better strut coverage than BioMatrix NeoFlex Biolimus A9-eluting stent having a biodegradable polymer; both showed similar antiproliferative efficacy. This novel, longitudinal, sequential optical coherence tomography protocol using each patient as own control could achieve conclusive results in small sample size.. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01742507.

Topics: Absorbable Implants; Aged; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Hong Kong; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neointima; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Predictive Value of Tests; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Treatment Outcome

The authors sought to compare the safety and efficacy of the biocompatible durable-polymer zotarolimus-eluting stent with the biodegradable-polymer biolimus-eluting stent in unselected coronary patients.. Biodegradable-polymer biolimus-eluting stents are superior to first-generation durable-polymer drug-eluting stents in long-term randomized all-comer trials. Long-term data comparing them to second-generation durable-polymer drug-eluting stents are lacking.. The study was a randomized, multicenter, all-comer, noninferiority trial in patients with chronic stable coronary artery disease or acute coronary syndromes and at least 1 coronary artery lesion requiring treatment with a drug-eluting stent. Endpoints included major adverse cardiac events (MACE), a composite of safety (cardiac death and myocardial infarction not clearly attributable to a non-target lesion) and efficacy (target lesion revascularization); the individual endpoints of MACE; all-cause mortality; any myocardial infarction; target vessel revascularization; and definite or probable stent thrombosis at 36 months.. From March 2011 to August 2012, 2,999 patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either the zotarolimus-eluting (1,502 patients) or the biolimus-eluting (1,497 patients) stent. At 3-year follow-up, MACE occurred in 128 (8.6%) patients assigned to the durable-polymer zotarolimus-eluting stent and in 144 (9.6%) assigned to the biodegradable-polymer biolimus-eluting stent (p = 0.36). Occurrence of cardiac death (2.7% vs. 3.4%), myocardial infarction not clearly attributable to a non-target lesion (2.7% vs. 2.5%), and target lesion revascularization (5.4% vs. 5.5%) did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. Definite very late stent thrombosis occurred in 6 (0.4%) patients assigned to the durable-polymer zotarolimus-eluting stent and in 10 (0.7%) assigned to the biodegradable-polymer biolimus-eluting stent (p = 0.33).. At 3-year follow-up, the durable-polymer zotarolimus-eluting stent and the biodegradable-polymer biolimus-eluting stent were similar in clinical outcome, with no significant difference in safety and efficacy outcomes, including stent thrombosis.

Topics: Absorbable Implants; Aged; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Thrombosis; Denmark; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Polymers; Proportional Hazards Models; Prosthesis Design; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is a fundamental treatment that optimizes clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention, especially in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Although current international guidelines recommend DAPT for at least 12 months after implantation of a drug-eluting stent in patients with ACS, these recommendations are not based on randomized controlled trials dedicated to ACS population.. The SMART-DATE trial is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, and open-label study to demonstrate the noninferiority of 6-month DAPT compared with 12 months or longer DAPT in patients with ACS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. A total of 2,700 patients will undergo prospective, random assignment to either of the DAPT duration groups. To minimize the bias from different stent devices, the type of stents will be randomly assigned (everolimus-eluting stents, zotarolimus-eluting stents, or biolimus A9-eluting stents). The primary end point is a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and cerebrovascular events at 18 months after the index procedure. The major secondary end points are definite/probable stent thrombosis defined by the Academic Research Consortium and bleeding defined by Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 2-5.. The SMART-DATE randomized trial is the first study exploring the safety of 6-month DAPT compared with conventional 12-month or longer DAPT dedicated to patients with ACS after second-generation drug-eluting stent implantation.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adult; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Drug Monitoring; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Republic of Korea; Sirolimus; Ticlopidine; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

New-generation drug-eluting coronary stents have reduced the risk of coronary events, especially in patients with complex disease or lesions. To what extent different stent platforms, polymers, and antiproliferative drugs affect outcomes, however, is unclear. We investigated the safety and efficacy of a third-generation stent by comparing a highly biocompatible durable-polymer-coated zotarolimus-eluting stent with a biodegradable-polymer-coated biolimus-eluting stent.. This open-label, randomised, multicentre, non-inferiority trial was done at three sites across western Denmark. All patients who presented with stable coronary artery disease or acute coronary syndromes and at least one coronary artery lesion (more than 50% stenosis) from March, 2011, to August, 2012, were assessed for eligibility. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either the durable-polymer zotarolimus-eluting stent or the biodegradable-polymer biolimus-eluting stent. The primary endpoint was a composite of safety (cardiac death and myocardial infarction not clearly attributable to a non-target lesion) and efficacy (target-lesion revascularisation) at 12 months, analysed by intention to treat. The trial was powered to assess non-inferiority of durable-polymer zotarolimus-eluting stent compared with the biodegradable-polymer biolimus-eluting stent with a predetermined non-inferiority margin of 0·025. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01956448.. Of 7103 screened, 1502 patients with 1883 lesions were assigned to receive the durable-polymer zotarolimus-eluting stent and 1497 patients with 1791 lesions to receive the biodegradable-polymer biolimus-eluting stent. 79 (5·3%) and 75 (5·0%) patients, respectively, met the primary endpoint (absolute risk difference 0·0025, upper limit of one-sided 95% CI 0·016%; p=0·004). The individual components of the primary endpoint did not differ significantly between stent types at 12 months.. The durable-polymer-coated zotarolimus-eluting stent was non-inferior to the biodegradable-polymer-coated biolimus-eluting stent in unselected patients.. Medtronic Cardiovascular and Biosensors Interventional Technologies.

Topics: Absorbable Implants; Aged; Coated Materials, Biocompatible; Denmark; Drug-Eluting Stents; Equipment Design; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Intention to Treat Analysis; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Ischemia; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Polymers; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

There have been no randomized studies comparing intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided versus conventional angiography-guided chronic total occlusion (CTO) intervention using new-generation drug-eluting stent Therefore, we conducted a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial designed to test the hypothesis that IVUS-guided CTO intervention is superior to angiography-guided intervention.. After successful guidewire crossing, 402 patients with CTOs were randomized to the IVUS-guided group (n=201) or the angiography-guided group (n=201) and secondarily randomized to Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stents or Nobori biolimus-eluting stents. The primary and secondary end points were cardiac death and a major adverse cardiac event defined as the composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or target-vessel revascularization, respectively. After 12-month follow-up, the rate of cardiac death was not significantly different between the IVUS-guided group (0%) and the angiography-guided group (1.0%; P by log-rank test=0.16). However, major adverse cardiac event rates were significantly lower in the IVUS-guided group than that in the angiography-guided group (2.6% versus 7.1%; P=0.035; hazard ratio, 0.35; 95% confidence interval, 0.13-0.97). Occurrence of the composite of cardiac death or myocardial infarction was significantly lower in the IVUS-guided group (0%) than in the angiography-guided group (2.0%; P=0.045). The rates of target-vessel revascularization were not significantly different between the 2 groups. In the comparison between Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent and Nobori biolimus-eluting stent, major adverse cardiac event rates were not significantly different (4.0% versus 5.7%; P=0.45).. Although IVUS-guided CTO intervention did not significantly reduce cardiac mortality, this randomized study demonstrated that IVUS-guided CTO intervention might improve 12-month major adverse cardiac event rate after new-generation drug-eluting stent implantation when compared with conventional angiography-guided CTO intervention.. URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01563952.

Topics: Aged; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Occlusion; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prospective Studies; Random Allocation; Sirolimus; Ultrasonography, Interventional

The second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) have shown superiority in many studies relating to safety and efficacy when compared with the first-generation DES. However, it is unclear whether there are differences in efficacy and safety among the second-generation DES after long-term follow-up.. This multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-labeled trial will directly compare the efficacy and safety among the patients treated with either everolimus-eluting stent (EES), zotarolimus-eluting stent with biolinx polymer (ZES-R), or biolimus-eluting stent (BES) with minimal exclusion criteria. The primary end point is a patient-oriented composite consisted of cardiac death, myocardial infarction not clearly attributable to a nontarget vessel and clinically indicated target lesion revascularization at 24-month clinical follow-up post-index procedure. With the hypothesis that "BES is non-inferior to EES" or "BES is non-inferior to ZES-R" in primary end point, approximately 2,600 patients will be assigned to one of the types of stents using a web-based randomization system.. The CHOICE trial will directly compare the efficacy and safety of EES, ZES-R, and BES in everyday clinical practice for long-term follow-up.

Topics: Adult; Algorithms; Coronary Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Male; Myocardial Infarction; Prosthesis Design; Sirolimus

Women with acute myocardial infarction (MI) undergoing mechanical reperfusion remain at increased risk of adverse cardiac events and mortality compared with their male counterparts. Whether the benefits of new-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) are preserved in women with acute MI remains unclear.. To investigate the long-term safety and efficacy of new-generation DES vs early-generation DES in women with acute MI.. Collaborative, international, individual patient-level data of women enrolled in 26 randomized clinical trials of DES were analyzed between July and December 2016. Only women presenting with an acute coronary syndrome were included. Study population was categorized according to presentation with unstable angina (UA) vs acute MI. Acute MI included non-ST-segment elevation MI (NSTEMI) or ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI).. Randomization to early- (sirolimus- or paclitaxel-eluting stents) vs new-generation (everolimus-, zotarolimus-, or biolimus-eluting stents) DES.. Composite of death, MI or target lesion revascularization, and definite or probable stent thrombosis at 3-year follow-up.. Overall, the mean age of participants was 66.8 years. Of 11 577 women included in the pooled data set, 4373 (37.8%) had an acute coronary syndrome as clinical presentation. Of these 4373 women, 2176 (49.8%) presented with an acute MI. In women with acute MI, new-generation DES were associated with lower risk of death, MI or target lesion revascularization (14.9% vs 18.4%; absolute risk difference, -3.5%; number needed to treat [NNT], 29; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.61-0.99), and definite or probable stent thrombosis (1.4% vs 4.0%; absolute risk difference, -2.6%; NNT, 46; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.19-0.69) without evidence of interaction for both end points compared with women without acute MI (P for interaction = .59 and P for interaction = .31, respectively). A graded absolute benefit with use of new-generation DES was observed in the transition from UA, to NSTEMI, and to STEMI (for death, MI, or target lesion revascularization: UA, -0.5% [NNT, 222]; NSTEMI, -3.1% [NNT, 33]; STEMI, -4.0% [NNT, 25] and for definite or probable ST: UA, -0.4% [NNT, 278]; NSTEMI, -2.2% [NNT, 46]; STEMI, -4.0% [NNT, 25]).. New-generation DES are associated with consistent and durable benefits over 3 years in women presenting with acute MI. The magnitude of these benefits appeared to be greater per increase in severity of acute coronary syndrome.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Angina, Unstable; Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Middle Aged; Mortality; Myocardial Infarction; Myocardial Revascularization; Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction; Paclitaxel; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Proportional Hazards Models; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recurrence; Sirolimus; ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction; Treatment Outcome

Comparative data on long-term safety and efficacy of bioresorbable-polymer-BES versus durable-polymer-EES/ZES in ACS setting have hitherto been lacking. We sought to assess the safety and efficacy of bioresorbable-polymer-biolimus-A9-eluting stents (BES) compared with thin-strut-durable-polymer-everolimus- and zotarolimus-eluting stents (EES/ZES) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing PCI.. Between 2007 and 2012, 1,547 patients were implanted with new-generation drug-eluting stents (DES). Out of these, 369 received BES and 1,178 EES/ZES. The primary endpoint was probable/definite stent thrombosis (ST) while the secondary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), target vessel revascularization (TVR) and definite ST up to 5 years. As stent assignment was not random, we performed a propensity score matching (PSM), with 1:3 ratio, to account for potential confounders. Primary analysis demonstrated no significant differences between both groups for the primary endpoint of ST (BES vs.. 1.6% vs. 1.9%; mean-event-time = 1,797 days vs. 1,795 days, respectively; P = 0.75) and composite safety endpoint (BES vs.. 12.5% vs. 12.9%; mean-event-time = 1,631 days vs. 1,620 days, respectively; P = 0.88). Results regarding the 5-year-ST- and safety endpoint remained non-significant after PSM (P = 0.85, P = 0.56; respectively). After stratification based on cardiovascular risk, no difference regarding ST and composite outcome measure has been documented between both stent groups in high-risk- and low-risk patients. The type of stent did neither predict ST (HR 1.11, 95%CI 0.45-2.74, P = 0.82) nor composite safety endpoint (HR 0.93, 95%CI 0.67-1.30, P = 0.69).. Long-term safety and efficacy of bioresorbable-polymer-BES and durable-polymer-EES/ZES appear comparable in patients with ACS. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Topics: Absorbable Implants; Acute Coronary Syndrome; Coronary Angiography; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Polymers; Prosthesis Design; Retrospective Studies; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Myocardial Ischemia; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Sirolimus

Percutaneous intervention of a coronary graft is the treatment of choice when the graft fails. The objective is to report the long-term results of drug-eluting stents (DES) in mammary artery grafts (MAG). Patients who had been treated with DES for MAG in 27 centers were selected. The baseline and procedural clinical data were included prospectively, and the follow-up was performed with the patients, families, and medical records. Two hundred and sixty-eight patients were included: age 65.5 ± 10.1 years, diabetes 47.8%, ejection fraction 55.5 ± 14.9%.. stable angina 28.4%, unstable angina 38.1%, non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction 21.6%, ST-elevation myocardial infarction 5.3%, and heart failure 6.7%; 1.19 ± 0.59 stents/patient were implanted measuring 18.8 ± 8.8 mm in length and 2.68 ± 0.35 mm in diameter. Rapamycin was used in 78 cases (29.1%), paclitaxel in 77 (28.7%), everolimus in 70 (26.1%), zotarolimus in 34 (12.7%), and biolimus in 9 (3.4%). All cases were successful except for 1 in which the patient died 30 minutes after the procedure. There were no other inhospital events. After a follow-up of 41 months (Q25: 23.7 to Q75: 57.8), 24 patients (9%) died of heart-related causes and 20 (7.5%) of noncardiac causes. Repeat revascularization was necessary in 31 cases, and in 1 additional patient, there was total occlusion, which was not treated. These 32 patients represented 11.9% of the total. In conclusion, the implantation of DES in MAG shows very high procedural success and also low long-term event rates.

Topics: Aged; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Internal Mammary-Coronary Artery Anastomosis; Male; Middle Aged; Paclitaxel; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome

This study compared safety and efficacy of first- and second-generation DES in an unrestricted, real-life population of diabetic patients undergoing PCI.. The study was a subanalysis of diabetic patients from the all-comer Katowice-Zabrze Registry of patients undergoing PCI with the implantation of either first- (Paclitaxel-, Sirolimus-eluting stents) or second-generation DES (Zotarolimus-, Everolimus-, Biolimus-eluting stents). Efficacy defined as major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE: death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, stroke) and safety defined as stent thrombosis (ST) were evaluated at 1 year.. From the total of 1916 patients, 717 were diabetics. Among them, 257 (36%) were treated with first-generation DES (230 [89%] Paclitaxel-eluting stents, 27 [11%] Sirolimus-eluting stents), 460 with second-generation DES (171 [37%] Zotarolimus-eluting stents, 243 [53%] Everolimus-eluting stents, 46 [10%] Biolimus-eluting stents). Rate of MACCE was equal in both groups (p=0.54). Second-generation DES had a better safety profile than first-generation DES (log-rank for cumulative ST at 1 year p<0.001). First-generation DES was a risk factor for ST (HR 5.75 [1.16-28.47], p=0.03) but not for MACCE (HR 0.89 [0.6-1.32], p=0.57).. In a real-life setting of diabetic patients undergoing PCI, second-generation DES had lower risk of ST and similar MACCE rate compared to first-generation DES.

Topics: Aged; Angiography; Coronary Stenosis; Diabetes Mellitus; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Myocardial Revascularization; Paclitaxel; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Poland; Proportional Hazards Models; Registries; Retrospective Studies; Sirolimus; Stents; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome

To explore the 2-year clinical outcomes in patients with unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) disease treated with overall new drug-eluting stent (DES) options.. Recent available data have shown the feasibility and the safety of new DESs, mainly evaluating the everolimus-eluting stents in the setting of ULMCA disease.. Patients with ULMCA disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with everolimus-, zotarolimus-, and biolimus A9-eluting stents were prospectively evaluated. The study objective was the composite of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), consisting of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), and target vessel revascularization (TVR) at 2-year clinical follow-up.. A total of 154 patients were analyzed. The mean EuroSCORE and SYNTAX scores were 4.7 ± 2.6 and 27.5 ± 8.3, respectively. Distal location was present in 126 patients (81.8%) and 96 lesions (76.3%) were true Medina bifurcations. The 2-stent technique was used in 73 cases (57.9%). Everolimus-, zotarolimus-, and biolimus A9-eluting stents were implanted in 68 patients (44.2%), 46 patients (29.9%), and 40 patients (25.9%), respectively. At a median clinical follow-up of 551.5 days (interquartile range, 360.8-1045.5 days), MACEs occurred in 29 patients (18.8%). Ten patients (6.5%) died, and 2 deaths (1.3%) were adjudicated as cardiac. No patient had myocardial infarction or definite stent thrombosis (ST). One probable and 1 possible ST were adjudicated. TVR was required in 19 patients (12.3%) and target lesion revascularization was required in only 7 patients (4.5%).. In our experience, despite the presence of complex distal left main lesions, new DESs in ULMCA disease appear to be promising in terms of safety and efficacy at 2-year clinical follow-up.

Topics: Aged; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prospective Studies; Registries; Retrospective Studies; Sirolimus; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Humans; Sirolimus; Terminology as Topic

The aim of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetics of the four limus-eluting stents used in Japanese patients.. There are presently no reports comparing human pharmacokinetics among drug-eluting stents (DESs).. We retrospectively analyzed data from pharmacokinetic studies of patients implanted with an 18-mm DES: Cypher stent (sirolimus, n = 10), Endeavor stent (zotarolimus, n = 7), Xience V stent (everolimus, n = 6), and Nobori stent (biolimus A9, n = 10), in multicenter trials of Japan. Total drug doses of the Cypher stent, Endeavor stent, Xience V stent, and Nobori stent were 150, 180, 88, and 293 μg, respectively. Drug concentrations were measured in serial whole blood samples after implantation and the pharmacokinetics were analyzed.. Mean peak drug levels were 0.86 ng mL(-1) for Cypher, 1.80 ng mL(-1) for Endeavor, 0.50 ng mL(-1) for Xience V, and 0.09 ng mL(-1) for Nobori. After adjustment for the loaded dose, mean peak drug levels of the Cypher and Xience V stents were similar (0.0057 ng mL(-1) μg(-1) each) while the Endeavor (0.0100 ng mL(-1) μg(-1)) was higher, and the Nobori (0.0003 ng mL(-1) μg(-1)) was lower, compared with the Cypher and Xience V stents. The other pharmacokinetic parameters of four DESs differed according to characteristics of the coated drug. The systemic exposure of biolimus A9 was much lower than that of the other DESs studied.. In Japanese patients, systemic exposure was low, regardless of the type of limus drug eluted from the stents; but specific pharmacokinetic activities were varied according to the drug characteristics, concentration, and DES design.

Topics: Aged; Analysis of Variance; Asian People; Cardiovascular Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Female; Humans; Japan; Linear Models; Male; Middle Aged; Models, Biological; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Prosthesis Design; Retrospective Studies; Sirolimus

The introduction of the drug-eluting stent (DES) has revolutionized the field of interventional cardiology during the past decade. Initial pivotal randomized clinical trials showed a large reduction in restenosis rates and the need for repeat intervention with DES compared with bare-metal stents. The three main components of a DES are 1) the stent platform, 2) a coating facilitating elution of the drug (mostly a polymer), and 3) a antiproliferative/anti-inflammatory drug. Currently, two classes of drugs are widely used in DES, Taxanes, including its best-known member Paclitaxel, and Rapamycins, which include Sirolimus and its analogues such as Everolimus, Zotarolimus and Biolimus A9. The first DES to receive United States Food and Drug Administration approval was the Sirolimus-eluting stent. Recently, two other stent types eluting a Sirolimus-analogue were approved; the Zotarolimus-eluting stent and the Everolimus-eluting stent. Biolimus A9-eluting stents, using biodegradable polymers, are currently approved and marketed outside of the United States. This review article focusses on the clinical studies that have been performed with DES eluting Sirolimus or its analogues.

Topics: Constriction, Pathologic; Everolimus; Humans; Sirolimus; Stents

Despite the undeniable contribution of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) to assess drug-eluting stent (DES) effectiveness, the way these image modalities correlate to each other and to target-lesion revascularization (TLR) after PCI, is yet to be established. Thus we sought to evaluate whether there is an acceptable correlation between QCA and IVUS after DES implantation. We analyzed 204 pts treated with DES: Zotarolimus- (126), Sirolimus- (57), and Biolimus (31) with baseline and follow-up QCA and IVUS. The correlation between QCA lumen loss (LL) and intimal hyperplasia (IH) volume obstruction by IVUS was assessed by multiple regression analysis. Two QCA parameters (in-segment diameter stenosis and in-segment LL) and one IVUS variable (in-stent volume of IH) were evaluated as quantitative surrogates of 6 month TLR. The receiver operating characteristic method with c-statistics was used to assess the ability of each surrogate endpoint to predict TLR. QCA LL correlated positively with IVUS IH volume of obstruction (r = 0.69; CI95% 0.61-0.75: P < 0.0001), independent of DES type. The 2 QCA parameters were superior to the IVUS parameter as surrogates for TLR. Of note, QCA LL (c = 0.99) correlated best with TLR, even better than percent DS. In the DES era there is a good correlation between QCA measured LL and IVUS IH volume and therefore can be used as a surrogate of DES efficacy.

Topics: Coronary Angiography; Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Regression Analysis; ROC Curve; Sirolimus; Ultrasonography, Interventional

There is evidence that endothelial coverage of drug-eluting stents might be delayed or absent, a risk factor for late thrombotic events. We studied the effects of different drug-polymer-device iterations on endothelium-dependent coronary vasomotion. Systemic markers of endothelial inflammation were correlated with coronary vasomotor changes.. Patients with paclitaxel-eluting stents (n=11), sirolimus-eluting stents (n=21), biolimus A9-eluting stents (n=28), zotarolimus-eluting stents (n=10), and bare-metal stents (n=13) were studied 10, 9, 9, 9, and 12 months after implantation, respectively. Endothelium-dependent coronary vasomotion was tested proximally and distally to the stent and at a reference vessel segment during atrial pacing at increasing heart rates by quantitative coronary angiography. Indexes of platelet-monocyte binding and other biomarkers were studied in a subgroup of 19 patients. The baseline characteristics and hemodynamics of the patients in the different stent groups were comparable. Significant differences were observed across the 5 stent groups, concerning the vasomotion of segments proximal (P=0.006) and distal (P=0.003) to the stent. Normal vasomotion (vasodilatation) was maintained in the biolimus A9-eluting stent, zotarolimus-eluting stent, and bare-metal stent groups, whereas vasoconstriction was observed in the sirolimus-eluting stent and paclitaxel-eluting stent groups. Platelet-monocyte binding in whole blood showed a significant inverse correlation with vasomotion in reference but not in segments adjacent to the stent (r=-0.57; P=0.01).. Paclitaxel-eluting stents and sirolimus-eluting stents seem to cause endothelial dysfunction of the implanted vessel, whereas biolimus A9-eluting stents and zotarolimus-eluting stents behave more closely to bare-metal stents, with preserved endothelial vasomotor response. Coronary vasoconstriction was not associated with detectable systemic endothelial activation.

Topics: Blood Platelets; Cardiovascular Agents; Cell Aggregation; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Vessels; Drug-Eluting Stents; Endothelium, Vascular; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Monocytes; P-Selectin; Paclitaxel; Sirolimus; Vasoconstriction; Vasodilation