ucb-34714 and perampanel

Brivaracetam (BRV), cenobamate (CNB), eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL), lacosamide (LCM) and perampanel (PER) are antiseizure medications (ASMs) approved for adjunctive treatment of focal-onset seizures. So far, no randomised controlled trial directly compared the efficacy and safety of these drugs.. We estimated the comparative efficacy and safety of these ASMs for the treatment of focal-onset seizures in adults with epilepsy using a network meta-analysis (NMA).. We systematically searched (June week 4, 2021) MEDLINE (accessed by PubMed), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and the US National Institutes of Health Clinical Trials Registry ( http://www.clinicaltrials.gov ). There were no date limitations or language restrictions. Randomised, double-blinded, controlled, parallel-group, add-on studies that compared oral BRV, CNB, ESL, LCM, and PER versus any comparator over maintenance periods of at least 12 weeks and included adult patients with focal seizures uncontrolled by concomitant ASMs were identified. The efficacy outcomes were the proportions of patients with ≥ 50% and 100% reduction in baseline seizure frequency during the maintenance period. The tolerability outcomes were the proportions of participants who experienced at least one treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) and experienced at least one TEAE leading to discontinuation. Effect sizes were estimated by network meta-analyses within a frequentist framework. The hierarchy of competing interventions was established using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA).. Sixteen trials (BRV: n = 3, CNB: n = 1, ESL: n = 4, LCM: n = 4, PER: n = 4) were included, overall enrolling 4507 patients randomised to add-on active treatments (BRV = 803, CNB = 221, ESL =9 90, LCM = 1104, and PER = 1389) and 2246 to add-on placebo. Cenobamate was associated with a higher rate of ≥ 50% seizure frequency reduction than BRV [odds ratio (OR) 2.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.11-3.66], ESL (OR 1.93, 95% CI 1.07-3.48), LCM (OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.04-3.32), and PER (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.16-3.70). There was a not statistically significant trend favouring CNB over ESL, LCM and PER for the seizure freedom outcome. Brivaracetam (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.44-0.86) and LCM (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.40-0.88) were associated with a lower proportion of participants experiencing TEAEs compared to ESL, and patients treated with PER were associated with a higher risk to experience at least one TEAE (OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.02-1.96) than BRV. According to SUCRA, CNB had the greatest likelihood of being the best option for the ≥ 50% and 100% seizure frequency reduction, and BRV and LCM had the highest probabilities of being the best-tolerated treatments.. Cenobamate ranked best for efficacy, and BRV and LCM were best tolerated over the other comparators. Although NMAs cannot replace direct comparisons, they may support physicians in clinical decision making.

Topics: Adult; Anticonvulsants; Carbamates; Chlorophenols; Dibenzazepines; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Middle Aged; Network Meta-Analysis; Nitriles; Pyridones; Pyrrolidinones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Seizures; Tetrazoles

To understand the currently available post-marketing real-world evidence of the incidences of and discontinuations due to the BAEs of irritability, anger, and aggression in people with epilepsy (PWE) treated with the anti-seizure medications (ASMs) brivaracetam (BRV), levetiracetam (LEV), perampanel (PER), and topiramate (TPM), as well as behavioral adverse events (BAEs) in PWE switching from LEV to BRV.. A systematic review of published literature using the Cochrane Library, PubMed/MEDLINE, and Embase was performed to identify retrospective and prospective observational studies reporting the incidence of irritability, anger, or aggression with BRV, LEV, PER, or TPM in PWE. The incidences of these BAEs and the rates of discontinuation due to each were categorized by ASM, and where possible, weighted means were calculated but not statistically assessed. Behavioral and psychiatric adverse events in PWE switching from LEV to BRV were summarized descriptively.. A total of 1500 records were identified in the searches. Of these, 44 published articles reporting 42 studies met the study criteria and were included in the data synthesis, 7 studies were identified in the clinical trial database, and 5 studies included PWE switching from LEV to BRV. Studies included a variety of methods, study populations, and definitions of BAEs. While a wide range of results was reported across studies, weighted mean incidences were 5.6% for BRV, 9.9% for LEV, 12.3% for PER, and 3.1% for TPM for irritability; 3.3%* for BRV, 2.5% for LEV, 2.0% for PER, and 0.2%* for TPM for anger; and 2.5% for BRV, 2.6% for LEV, 4.4% for PER, and 0.5%* for TPM for aggression. Weighted mean discontinuation rates were 0.8%* for BRV, 3.4% for LEV, 3.0% for PER, and 2.2% for TPM for irritability and 0.8%* for BRV, 2.4% for LEV, 9.2% for PER, and 1.2%* for TPM for aggression. There were no discontinuations for anger. Switching from LEV to BRV led to improvement in BAEs in 33.3% to 83.0% of patients (weighted mean, 66.6%). *Denotes only 1 study.. This systematic review characterizes the incidences of irritability, anger, and aggression with BRV, LEV, PER, and TPM, and it provides robust real-world evidence demonstrating that switching from LEV to BRV may improve BAEs. While additional data remain valuable due to differences in methodology (which make comparisons difficult), these results improve understanding of the real-world incidences of discontinuations due to these BAEs in clinical practice and can aid in discussions and treatment decision-making with PWE.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Humans; Levetiracetam; Nitriles; Observational Studies as Topic; Pyridones; Pyrrolidinones; Retrospective Studies; Topiramate; Treatment Outcome

To date, there has not been a single randomized controlled trial (RCT) conducted to directly compare the efficacy and safety of perampanel to brivaracetam in the adjunctive treatment of focal-onset seizures. This study makes these comparisons through the use of indirect treatment comparison (ITC) methods.. A systematic review was conducted to identify RCTs that evaluated either one of perampanel or brivaracetam in the treatment of patients with focal-onset seizures. The Bucher ITC method was then used to compare efficacy and safety outcomes between perampanel and brivaracetam. Additional subgroup analyses, by levetiracetam usage (prior or concomitant), were conducted.. Eight RCTs (four comparing perampanel to placebo, four comparing brivaracetam to placebo) were included in the ITC. For patients taking concomitant levetiracetam, perampanel showed a significantly better responder rate compared to brivaracetam [relative risk (RR) and 95 % confidence interval (CI): 2.62 (1.15, 5.99)]. For patients who had previously, or never, taken levetiracetam, there was no difference in the responder rate. In the overall population, both perampanel and brivaracetam were more effective than placebo in terms of responder rate, seizure freedom, and secondarily generalized tonic-clonic seizure responder rate; however, for these outcomes, no evidence of a difference between perampanel and brivaracetam was found. Patients taking brivaracetam showed significantly less dizziness compared to patients taking perampanel. No differences for any other safety outcome were found.. Perampanel and brivaracetam are effective for the adjunctive treatment of focal-onset seizures and display similar adverse event profiles. Perampanel demonstrated an improved focal-onset seizure responder rate compared to brivaracetam in patients taking concomitant levetiracetam. This may be due to the similarity in the mechanism of action between brivaracetam and levetiracetam.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Levetiracetam; Nitriles; Pyridones; Pyrrolidinones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Seizures; Treatment Outcome

In previous works, alterations of neurotransmitters and neuropeptides in the brain areas involved in generalized epilepsy have been reported.. We reviewed the alterations of these neurotransmitters and neuropeptides in the following brain areas involved in generalized epilepsy: hippocampus, hypothalamus, thalamus and cerebral cortex. In these brain areas, the neural networks are also actualized. The mechanisms of action of newer antiepileptic drugs in the treatment of generalized epilepsy are also discussed.. Up-dating the neurotransmitter and neuropeptide alterations, we found that hippocampal GABAergic neurons presynaptically inhibit epileptogenic neurons via GABAB receptors. Epilepsy modulating neuropeptides (galanin, neuropeptide Y, dynorphin) are also involved. GABA deficiency, serotonin hyperactivity, dopamine hyperactivity and glutamate excitotoxicity can enhance ictogenesis: neurons containing these neurotransmitters form the main neural circuit. An increased excitability occurs when the alteration of these neurotransmitters is permanent.. In preclinical studies, the GABAB receptor agonist GS 39,783 exerted a good antiepileptic effect. Perampanel, an AMPA receptor antagonist, showed good clinical effects in the treatment of partial-onset seizures and primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures. In this treatment, perampanel can be combined with other antiepileptic drugs. Brivaracetam, which shows a high affinity for the synaptic vesicle 2A, exerted a good efficacy in the treatment of adult focal seizures and secondarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Cyclopentanes; Epilepsy, Generalized; GABA Antagonists; Humans; Nerve Net; Neurotransmitter Agents; Nitriles; Pyridones; Pyrimidines; Pyrrolidinones; Receptors, AMPA; Seizures

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Clinical Trials as Topic; Epilepsy; Half-Life; Humans; Nitriles; Pyridones; Pyrrolidinones; Receptors, AMPA; Status Epilepticus; Treatment Outcome

Eslicarbazepine (ESL), Lacosamide (LAC), Perampanel (PER) and Brivaracetam (BRV), have recently been marketed as third-generation antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). We conducted a meta-analysis to indirectly compare overall efficacy and tolerability between third-generation AEDs in uncontrolled focal epilepsy.. We performed an online database search using Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Online Library, and Clinicaltrial.gov for all available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated the therapeutic effects over a range of AED doses versus placebo. We then compared clinical efficacy and tolerability between these newer AEDs using Indirect Treatment Comparison software.. Nineteen RCTs with a total of 7245 patients were included in our study. There were no significant differences in the risk difference of 50% responder rates and seizure free rates between third generation AEDs, regardless of dose. The risk of treatment emergent adverse events was significantly higher with ESL and PER treatment compared to BRV at all doses combined. Withdrawal rates due to adverse events were also significantly higher in patients treated with the highest doses of LAC and PER versus BRV, while treatment with ESL or LAC was related to higher withdrawal rates versus BRV when all doses were combined.. Our analysis suggested there were no significant differences in efficacy between third generation AEDs in uncontrolled focal epilepsy. BRV may have the best tolerability profile. The other AEDs were associated with a higher risk for intolerable adverse, especially when taken at a high doses. The results from these indirect comparisons warrant further examination and verification through future well-designed trials.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Dibenzazepines; Epilepsies, Partial; Humans; Lacosamide; Nitriles; Pyridones; Pyrrolidinones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

There has been growing recognition of the possible abuse potential of newer generation antiepileptic drugs, and several of these agents have been categorized as controlled substances in the United States. To properly schedule a new medication, the abuse potential, or the potential for a drug to be used for its nonmedical positive subjective effects, must be determined. Performing a human abuse potential study is one step in the overall abuse potential assessment. These studies analyze the abuse potential of a new drug in a very specific population of known recreational drug users. Studying the test drug in this population enables a more meaningful assessment of abuse, and likely represents the population most probable to abuse. In these double-blind, single-dose, active and placebo controlled studies subjects may report their subjective liking, estimated street value, and rate euphoric or depressive sensations of the test drug compared with placebo and scheduled active comparators with a known abuse potential. In order to provide an enhanced understanding of the abuse potential assessment and how it relates to controlled substance scheduling, this review will examine the human abuse potential studies of perampanel, eslicarbazepine, lacosamide, and brivaracetam.

Topics: Acetamides; Anticonvulsants; Dibenzazepines; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Lacosamide; Nitriles; Prescription Drug Misuse; Pyridones; Pyrrolidinones

Four "third-generation" antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) were approved for adjunctive treatment of refractory focal onset seizures during the past 10 years. Long-term efficacy and safety of the drugs were demonstrated in large extension studies and in reports of subgroups of patients not studied in pivotal trials. Reviewing extension study and post-marketing outcome series for the four newer AEDs-lacosamide, perampanel, eslicarbazepine acetate and brivaracetam-can guide clinicians in treating and monitoring patients. AED extension studies evaluate treatment retention, drug tolerability, and drug safety during individualized treatment with flexible dosing and thus provide information not available in rigid pivotal trials. Patient retention in the studies ranged from 75 to 80% at 1 year and from 36 to 68% at 2-year treatment intervals. Safety findings were generally similar to those of pivotal trials, with no major safety risks identified and with several specific adverse drug effects, such as hyponatremia, reported. The third-generation AEDs, some through new mechanisms and others with improved tolerability compared to related AEDs, provide new options in efficacy and tolerability.

Topics: Acetamides; Anticonvulsants; Dibenzazepines; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Lacosamide; Longitudinal Studies; Medication Adherence; Nitriles; Product Surveillance, Postmarketing; Pyridones; Pyrrolidinones; Seizures

Brivaracetam (BRV), eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL), lacosamide (LCM), and perampanel (PER) have been recently marketed as adjunctive treatments for focal onset seizures. To date, no randomized controlled trial (RCT) has directly compared BRV with ESL, LCM, or PER.. To compare BRV with the other add-on AEDs in patients with uncontrolled focal epilepsy, estimating their efficacy and tolerability through an adjusted, common-reference based indirect comparison meta-analysis.. We systematically searched RCTs in which add-on treatment with ESL or LCM in patients with focal onset seizures have been compared with placebo. Efficacy and tolerability outcomes were considered. Random-effects Mantel-Haenszel meta-analyses were performed to obtain odds ratios (ORs) for the efficacy of BRV, LCM, ESL, or PER versus placebo. Adjusted indirect comparisons were then made between BRV and the other three AEDs using the obtained results, comparing the minimum and the highest effective recommended daily dose of each drug.. Seventeen RCTs, with a total of 4971 patients were included. After adjusting for dose-effects, indirect comparisons showed no difference between BRV and LCM, ESL, or PER for responder rate and seizure freedom. Lower adverse events were observed with high dose BRV compared to high dose ESL or PER, but no difference was found in withdrawing because of adverse events.. Indirect comparisons do not demonstrate a significant difference in efficacy between add-on BRV and LCM, ESL, or PER in focal epilepsy, and might suggest a better tolerability of BRV than ESL, and possibly also PER, at the highest effective recommended dose.

Topics: Acetamides; Anticonvulsants; Dibenzazepines; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsies, Partial; Humans; Lacosamide; Nitriles; Pyridones; Pyrrolidinones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

The antiseizure drugs commonly used as first- and second-line treatments for neonatal seizures display poor efficacy. Thus, drug mechanisms of action that differ from these typical agents might provide better seizure control. Perampanel, an AMPA-receptor antagonist, and brivaracetam, a SV2A ligand, might fill that role.. We utilized methyl-6,7-dimethoxy-4-ethyl-beta-carboline-3-carboxylate (DMCM) to evoke seizures in rats to assess the efficacy of perampanel and brivaracetam treatment in clinically relevant doses.. In postnatal day (P)10 rats, neither perampanel nor brivaracetam suppressed seizure activity. By contrast, in P21 rats, both drugs decreased the severity of seizures. This effect was evident at the 20 and 40 mg/kg doses of brivaracetam and at the 0.9 and 2.7 mg/kg doses of perampanel.. These data indicate that while the efficacy of these drugs may be limited for neonatal seizures, their efficacy increases over early postnatal development.

Topics: Aging; Animals; Anticonvulsants; Carbolines; Convulsants; Female; Nitriles; Pyridones; Pyrrolidinones; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Seizures

We present pharmacokinetic data during pregnancy and lactation for brivaracetam, lacosamide and perampanel based on two case studies. Patient 1 used brivaracetam as monotherapy and gave birth to twins. Patient 2 used a combination of brivaracetam, lacosamide and perampanel. In both patients, serum drug concentrations were monitored throughout the pregnancies. Drug concentrations were also analysed in umbilical cord blood at birth, in serum from the offspring and in breastmilk after five days and 3-11 weeks. There were minor changes in concentration/dose-ratios for brivaracetam and lacosamide. The mean milk/serum ratios for brivaracetam and lacosamide were 0.71 and 0.83, respectively, five days and 3-5 weeks after delivery. The perampanel serum concentration increased by up to 80% in Patient 2 during the last part of gestation. The mean milk/serum-ratio for perampanel was 0.13, unchanged from five days to five weeks after delivery. Whereas serum concentrations of brivaracetam and lacosamide remained fairly stable throughout pregnancy, perampanel concentrations seemed to steadily increase towards the end. The distribution to milk was considerable for brivaracetam and lacosamide and low for perampanel. More studies on mother-infant pairs are warranted to confirm these results in larger groups.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Lactation; Nitriles; Pharmaceutical Preparations; Pregnancy; Pyridones; Pyrrolidinones

Perampanel (PER) and brivaracetam (BRV) are third-generation antiseizure medications. The aim of the present retrospective, double-centre study was to compare the effectiveness and tolerability between PER and BRV in adult patients with epilepsy. We reviewed the clinical charts of patients affected by epilepsy, admitted to the Epilepsy Centre at the University Hospital of Rome "Tor Vergata" and the Cardarelli Hospital in Naples, who started BRV or PER as add-on treatment for controlling seizures with a follow-up of 12 months. Seizure freedom, >50% seizure reduction, retention rate, and adverse events reported during follow-up were compared between the two drugs. Moreover, we considered the effects of both drugs in specific subsets of patients: age ≥60 years, male or female, in patients with genetic generalized epilepsy, and considering previous treatment with levetiracetam (LEV). Forty-three patients treated with BRV and 64 patients treated with PER were included in this study and followed at both sites for 12 months. Similar effectiveness was observed between BRV and PER, with similar rates of seizure freedom (30% vs 31%) and >50% seizure reduction (32% vs 34%) during follow-up. Moreover, PER and BRV discontinuation rates, due to ineffectiveness or adverse events, were similar. Groups of patients who started BRV or PER as first add-on treatments were also compared but no differences in effectiveness or tolerability were identified. Lastly, BRV was shown to be more effective in patients who were not previously treated with LEV. This retrospective study reveals comparable effectiveness and tolerability between PER and BRV also when used as first add-on treatments, in patients with epilepsy.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticonvulsants; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Nitriles; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Pyridones; Pyrrolidinones; Retrospective Studies; Young Adult

We report the most notable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of the antiepileptic drugs commercialised in the last four years (eslicarbazepine acetate, brivaracetam and perampanel). Their efficacy and safety are analysed in open-label clinical trials, which are the ones that reproduce their use in everyday life, without the rigid protocols used in clinical trials.. Farmacos antiepilepticos.. Se refieren las caracteristicas farmacocineticas y farmacodinamicas mas destacadas de los farmacos antiepilepticos comercializados en los cuatro ultimos años (acetato de eslicarbacepina, brivaracetam y perampanel). Se analiza su eficacia y tolerabilidad en estudios clinicos abiertos, que son los que reproducen su utilizacion en la vida diaria, sin los protocolos rigidos de los ensayos clinicos.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Dibenzazepines; Epilepsy; Humans; Nitriles; Pyridones; Pyrrolidinones