ubiquinone-9 and methylamine

ubiquinone-9 has been researched along with methylamine* in 1 studies

Other Studies

1 other study(ies) available for ubiquinone-9 and methylamine

ArticleYear
Analytical method for ubiquinone-9 and ubiquinone-10 in rat tissues by liquid chromatography/turbo ion spray tandem mass spectrometry with 1-alkylamine as an additive to the mobile phase.
    Analytical biochemistry, 2005, Mar-01, Volume: 338, Issue:1

    We investigated the application of 1-alkylamines, as additives to the mobile phase, to a quantification method for ubiquinone-9 (CoQ9) and ubiquinone-10 (CoQ10) in rat thigh muscle and heart using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). In the optimization of the analytical method, we found that 1-alkylamines mixed with CoQ9 and CoQ10 in the turbo ion sprayed solution formed the 1-alkylammonium adduct molecules of these compounds during the ionization process and that the intensity of the adduct ions was considerably higher than that of the protonated molecules ([M+H]+) of these compounds. Furthermore, we investigated a variety of 1-alkylamines in the mobile phase for LC-MS/MS analysis to select the most appropriate 1-alkylamine for higher sensitivities of CoQ9 and CoQ10. After these examinations, we found that methylamine was the most suitable additive for the mobile phase, allowing a 12.5-fold gain in signal intensity in the full ion mass spectrum compared with that without methylamine. The internal standard (IS) used was ubiquinone-11 (CoQ11) for each analyte. The analytes and IS were extracted with methanol from the tissue homogenates at neutral pH and were injected into an LC-MS/MS with a turbo ion spray interface. The calibration curves for CoQ9 (5-500 microg/g in thigh muscle and 50-10,000 microg/g in heart) and CoQ10 (1-500 microg/g in thigh muscle and 10-10,000 microg/g in heart) showed good linearity. The method was precise; the relative standard deviations of the method for rat thigh muscle were not more than 13.5 and 9.0% for CoQ9 and CoQ10, respectively, and those for rat heart were not more than 6.7 and 5.4% for CoQ9 and CoQ10, respectively. The accuracies of the method for both rat thigh muscle and heart were good, with the deviations between the nominal concentration and calculated concentration of CoQ9 and CoQ10 typically being within 12.3 and 4.3%, respectively. This method provided reliable concentration levels for CoQ9 and CoQ10 in rat thigh muscle and heart.

    Topics: Amines; Animals; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry; Male; Methylamines; Muscles; Myocardium; Rats; Reproducibility of Results; Sensitivity and Specificity; Ubiquinone

2005