tulathromycin and gamithromycin

The objective of this project was to evaluate the effects of antimicrobials approved for parenteral metaphylactic use in feeder and stocker calves on morbidity and mortality for bovine respiratory disease with the use of a mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis. An initial literature review was conducted in April 2016 through Pubmed, Agricola, and CAB (Commonwealth Agricultural Bureau) for randomized controlled trials for metaphylaxis antimicrobial administered parentally to incoming feedlot or stocker calves within 48 h of arrival. The final list of publications included 29 studies, with a total of 37 trials. There were 8 different metaphylactic antimicrobials. Final event outcomes were categorized into bovine respiratory disease (BRD) morbidity cumulative incidence d 1 to ≤ 60 of the feeding period, BRD morbidity cumulative incidence d 1 to closeout of the feeding period, BRD mortality cumulative incidence d 1 to closeout of the feeding period, and BRD retreatment cumulative incidence morbidity d 1 to closeout of the feeding period. Network meta-analysis combined direct and indirect evidence for all the event outcomes to determine mean odds ratio (OR) with 95% credibility intervals (CrIs) for all metaphylactic antimicrobial comparisons. The "upper tier" treatment arms for morbidity d 1 to ≤ 60 included tulathromycin, gamithromycin, and tilmicosin. For BRD mortality cumulative incidence d 1 to closeout and BRD retreatment morbidity d 1 to closeout, classifying the treatment arms into tiers was not possible due to overlapping 95% CrIs. The results of this project accurately identified differences between metaphylactic antimicrobials, and metaphylactic antimicrobial options appear to offer different outcomes on BRD morbidity and mortality odds in feedlot cattle.

Topics: Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bovine Respiratory Disease Complex; Cattle; Disaccharides; Heterocyclic Compounds; Incidence; Macrolides; Tylosin

The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of gamithromycin (GAM) for the treatment of naturally occurring bacterial swine respiratory disease (SRD) administered IM. A total of 240 pigs (nine-weeks old) were selected from two sites in Heilongjiang Province of China. The pigs showed severe signs of respiratory disease. Among them, 120 pigs were randomly divided into 4 groups of low dose (3 mg/kg), middle dose (6 mg/kg), high dose (12 mg/kg) GAM IM injection and 2.5 mg/kg tulathromycin (TUL) IM injection (positive control group) for phase II clinical trial to screen effective therapeutic dose. The other 120 pigs were randomly divided into 2 groups of 6 mg/kg GAM IM injection and 2.5 mg/kg TUL IM injection (positive control group) for phase III clinical trial to further confirm the efficacy. Animals were clinically observed daily for 14 days after treatment initiation. The predominant pathogens present in pretreatment respiratory tract samples were Streptococcus suis (S. suis) and Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae (A. pleuropneumoniae). Haemophilus parasuis (H. parasuis) and Pasteurella multocida (P. multocida) were also found in the respiratory tract. All isolates were subjected to in vitro sensitivity testing and the measured minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of GAM were from 0.0625 μg/mL to 8 μg/mL. In all treatment groups, rectal temperature dropped and clinical index (mental status and respiratory symptom) significantly improved after treatment (P ≤ .05). As a result, 82.76% animals treated with the 6 mg/kg GAM injection were cured. This was significantly higher than that of 3 mg/kg GAM injection (P ≤ .05) and similar to that of 12 mg/kg GAM injection and 2.5 mg/kg TUL injection (P > .05) in phase II clinical trial. In phase III clinical trial, 80.70% of animals treated with the 6 mg/kg GAM injection were cured and the cure rate was similar to that of 2.5 mg/kg TUL injection (P > .05). In conclusion, we recommended a single dose (6 mg/kg) of GAM IM injection for the treatment of bacterial SRD.

Topics: Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacterial Infections; China; Disaccharides; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Heterocyclic Compounds; Macrolides; Respiratory Tract Infections; Swine; Swine Diseases

The objective of this study was to evaluate one strategy for control (metaphylaxis) of bovine respiratory disease, with and without co-morbidity with otitis media, in dairy heifers at a commercial development facility. Individual heifers were the experimental unit. At weaning, 1 of 3 experimental treatments (gamithromycin, tulathromycin, or no medication) was randomly assigned to 1,567 heifers from 11 different dairies. Gamithromycin was administered to 631 heifers, tulathromycin was administered to 621 heifers, and no medication was administered to 315 heifers (negative control). Heifers were then commingled and penned according to body weight. Each pen contained heifers from each group, and periodically, larger numbers of heifers were penned together. All heifers were observed for the subsequent 42 d and treated according to protocols prescribed for the facility. Morbidity due to respiratory disease was less for heifers medicated with gamithromycin than for heifers medicated with tulathromycin. Morbidity due to respiratory disease was less for heifers medicated with gamithromycin than for heifers in the negative control group. Fewer heifers medicated with either antimicrobial were subsequently treated because of co-morbidity with otitis media. Mortality was not different among the treatment groups. Heifers medicated with either antimicrobial had greater average daily gain than did heifers in the negative control group.

Topics: Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Body Weight; Cattle; Cattle Diseases; Disaccharides; Female; Heterocyclic Compounds; Macrolides; Morbidity; Otitis Media; Random Allocation; Respiratory Tract Diseases; Weaning

To compare the efficacy of gamithromycin with that of tulathromycin for the treatment of undifferentiated bovine respiratory disease complex (BRDC) in feedlot calves.. 1,049 weaned crossbred beef calves.. At each of 6 feedlots, newly arrived calves with BRDC were administered a single dose of gamithromycin (6.0 mg/kg, SC; n = 523) or tulathromycin (2.5 mg/kg, SC; 526). Case-fatality and BRDC retreatment rates during the first 120 days after treatment, final body weight, and average daily gain (ADG), were compared between treatments. At 2 feedlots, calves were assigned clinical scores for 10 days after treatment to determine recovery rates for each treatment. Bioequivalence limits for gamithromycin and tulathromycin were calculated for outcomes for which there was no significant difference between treatments.. Mean BRDC retreatment rate (17.7%) for calves administered gamithromycin was greater than that (9.0%) for calves administered tulathromycin. Mean case-fatality rate, final body weight, ADG, and clinical score 10 days after treatment did not differ significantly between treatments. Limits for mean differences within which gamithromycin was bioequivalent to tulathromycin were ± 2.4% for case-fatality rate, ± 13 kg for final body weight, and ± 0.1 kg/d for ADG.. Calves administered gamithromycin had a higher BRDC retreatment rate than did calves administered tulathromycin; otherwise, the clinical efficacy did not differ between the 2 treatments for the treatment of BRDC in feedlot calves.

Topics: Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bovine Respiratory Disease Complex; Cattle; Disaccharides; Heterocyclic Compounds; Housing, Animal; Macrolides; Male

To compare the efficacy of gamithromycin with that of tulathromycin for control of undifferentiated bovine respiratory disease complex (BRDC) in feedlot calves.. 2,529 weaned crossbred beef calves.. At each of 2 feedlots, calves at risk of developing BRDC were administered a single dose of gamithromycin (6.0 mg/kg, SC; n = 1,263) or tulathromycin (2.5 mg/kg, SC; 1,266) metaphylactically. Health (BRDC morbidity, mortality, case-fatality, and retreatment rates) and performance (average daily gain, dry matter intake, and feed-to-gain ratio) outcomes were compared between treatments via classical hypothesis testing. Bioequivalence limits for gamithromycin and tulathromycin were established for outcomes for which no significant difference between treatments was detected.. Mean BRDC morbidity rate (31.0%) for calves administered gamithromycin was greater than that (22.9%) for calves administered tulathromycin; otherwise, health and performance did not differ between treatments. Limits for mean differences within which gamithromycin was considered bioequivalent to tulathromycin were ± 10% for BRDC retreatment rate, ± 3.5% for BRDC mortality rate, ± 16% for case-fatality rate, ± 37 kg for final body weight, ± 0.1 kg/d for average daily gain, ± 0.3 kg/d for dry matter intake, and ± 0.7 for feed-to-gain ratio.. The efficacy of gamithromycin did not differ from that of tulathromycin for all outcomes except morbidity rate; calves administered gamithromycin had a higher BRDC morbidity rate than did calves administered tulathromycin. On the basis of the bioequivalence limits established for this dataset, gamithromycin was considered equivalent to tulathromycin for the control of BRDC.

Topics: Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bovine Respiratory Disease Complex; Cattle; Disaccharides; Heterocyclic Compounds; Housing, Animal; Macrolides; Male; Risk Factors

Contagious bovine pleuropneumonia (CBPP) caused by Mycoplasma mycoides subspecies mycoides (Mmm) is an important disease of cattle that causes serious economic losses. With the known effectiveness of new generation macrolides, tulathromycin and gamithromycin were assessed in comparison with oxytetracycline as a positive control and saline as a negative control for effectiveness in inhibiting lung lesion development, promoting resolution, preventing spread and bacteriological clearance in susceptible local cattle breeds in two separate studies in Kenya and Zambia. Animals were monitored for clinical signs, sero-conversion as well as detailed post-mortem examination for CBPP lesions.. Using the Hudson and Turner score for lesion type and size, tulathromycin protected 90%, gamithromycin 80%, and oxytetracycline 88% of treated animals in Kenya. In Zambia, all animals (100%) treated with macrolides were free of lung lesions, while oxytetracycline protected 77.5%. Using the mean adapted Hudson and Turner score, which includes clinical signs, post-mortem findings and serology, tulathromycin protected 82%, gamithromycin 56% and oxytetracycline 80% of the animals in Kenya whereas in Zambia, tulathromycin protected 98%, gamithromycin 94% and oxytetracycline 80%. The saline-treated groups had 93 and 92% lesions in Kenya and Zambia respectively, with Mmm recovered from 5/14 in Kenya and 10/13 animals in Zambia. Whereas the groups treated with macrolides were free from lesions in Zambia, in Kenya 5/15 tulathromycin-treated animals and 6/15 gamithromycin-treated animals showed lesions. Oxytetracycline-treated animals showed similarities with 3/14 and 4/15 showing lesions in Zambia and Kenya respectively and Mmm recovery from one animal in Kenya and six in Zambia. In both studies, lesion scores of saline-treated groups were significantly higher than those of the antibiotic treated groups (p < 0.001). In sentinel animals, CBPP lesions were detected and Mmm recovered from one and two animals mixed with the saline-treated groups in Kenya and Zambia respectively.. This study demonstrated that tulathromycin, a mycoplasmacidal, can achieve metaphylactic protection of up to 80%, while non-recovery of Mmm from sentinels suggests macrolides effectiveness in preventing spread of Mmm. It is recommended that further studies are conducted to evaluate strategies comparing vaccination alone or combining vaccination and antibiotics to control or eradicate CBPP.

Topics: Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cattle; Cattle Diseases; Disaccharides; Heterocyclic Compounds; Kenya; Lung; Macrolides; Male; Mycoplasma mycoides; Oxytetracycline; Pleuropneumonia, Contagious; Zambia

Deep digital septic conditions represent some of the most refractory causes of severe lameness in cattle. The objective of this study was to determine the distribution of tulathromycin, gamithromycin and florfenicol into the synovial fluid of the metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint of cattle after single subcutaneous administration of drug to evaluate the potential usefulness of these single-dose, long-acting antimicrobials for treating bacterial infections of the joints in cattle.. Twelve cross-bred beef cows were randomly assigned to one of the drugs. Following subcutaneous administration, arthrocentesis of the left metatarsophalangeal joint was performed at various time points up to 240 hours post-injection, and samples were analyzed for drug concentration. In synovial fluid, florfenicol pharmacokinetic parameters estimates were: mean Tmax 7 +/- 2 hours, mean t½ 64.9 +/- 20.1 hours and mean AUC0-inf 154.0 +/- 26.2 ug*h/mL. Gamithromycin synovial fluid pharmacokinetic parameters estimates were: mean Tmax 8 hours, mean t½ 77.9 +/- 30.0 hours, and AUC0-inf 6.5 +/- 2.9 ug*h/mL. Tulathromycin pharmacokinetic parameters estimates in synovial fluid were: Tmax 19 +/- 10 hours, t½ 109 +/- 53.9 hours, and AUC0-inf 57.6 +/- 28.2 ug h/mL.. In conclusion, synovial fluid concentrations of all three antimicrobials were higher for a longer duration than that of previously reported plasma values. Although clinical data are needed to confirm microbiological efficacy, florfenicol achieved a synovial fluid concentration greater than the MIC90 for F. necrophorum for at least 6 days.

Topics: Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Area Under Curve; Cattle; Disaccharides; Female; Half-Life; Heterocyclic Compounds; Injections, Subcutaneous; Macrolides; Synovial Fluid; Thiamphenicol