tropisetron and ramosetron

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ramosetron hydrochloride for the management of nausea and vomiting induced by chemotherapy in patients with hematological malignancies. A total of 30 patients with hematological malignancies were included in the ramosetron group. Ramosetron (0.3 mg i.v.) was administered 0.5 h before chemotherapy. The impact of ramosetron on anorexia, nausea and vomiting as well as other adverse effects were assessed. Meanwhile, another 39 patients received tropisetron (o.d. for 3 days). As compared to the tropisetron group, the response rate of the ramosetron group in controlling anorexia within 18-24 h after chemotherapy was higher (p < 0.05); within 18-24 h after chemotherapy, the complete response rate and effective rate in controlling nausea was higher (p < 0.05); within 12-18 h and 18-24 h after chemotherapy, the complete response rate and effective rate in controlling vomiting was higher (p < 0.05). The incidence of adverse effects was similar in both groups. We conclude that ramosetron belongs to a new generation of 5-HT3 receptor antagonists and that it is a safe, economic and effective antiemetic drug.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antiemetics; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Appetite; Benzimidazoles; Constipation; Dizziness; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Female; Flushing; Gastrointestinal Diseases; Headache; Hematologic Neoplasms; Humans; Indoles; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Thirst; Treatment Outcome; Tropisetron; Vomiting

The efficacy of an intravenous 5-HT3 antagonist (granisetron) and four oral 5-HT3 antagonists (granisetron, ondansetron, tropisetron and ramosetron) on chemotherapy-induced emesis were investigated in 21 gynecologic cancer patients (63 courses). The severity of emesis after chemotherapy was classified in 4 grades (0: none, 1: slight loss of appetite, 2: severe loss of appetite, but tolerable, and 3: untolerable). The effect of 5-HT3 antagonists was judged by both the score for the severity of the emesis and the frequency of vomiting. The four oral 5-HT3 antagonists were almost the same in efficacy for 5 days after chemotherapy. Oral 5-HT3 antagonists were almost equipotent to intravenous granisetron for JT (paclitaxel + carboplatin) therapy or T (paclitaxel) therapy for 5 days after chemotherapy. However, they were ineffective for CAP (cisplatin + adriamycin + cyclophosphamide) therapy. From these results, oral 5-HT3 antagonists were proved to have a sufficient anti emetic effect after chemotherapy in cases of JT or T therapy. However, in cases of CAP therapy, intravenous 5-HT3 antagonists were thought to be preferable for the control of emesis due to chemotherapy.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Antiemetics; Benzimidazoles; Carboplatin; Cisplatin; Cyclophosphamide; Doxorubicin; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Genital Neoplasms, Female; Granisetron; Humans; Indoles; Middle Aged; Nausea; Ondansetron; Paclitaxel; Serotonin Antagonists; Tropisetron; Vomiting

The aim of this study was to estimate interindividual differences in the antiemetic effects of 5-HT(3) receptor antagonists by evaluating the influence of pharmacokinetics on 5-HT(3) receptor occupancies, based on receptor occupancy theory.. We analyzed interindividual differences of 5-HT(3) receptor occupancies and antiemetic effects after the oral and/or intravenous administration of standard doses of the following 5-HT(3) receptor antagonists: azasetron, granisetron, indisetron, ondansetron, ramosetron, and tropisetron.. The interindividual difference between maximum and minimum 5-HT(3) receptor occupancies after oral administration ranged from 0.6% to 64.0%, and that difference after intravenous administration ranged from 0.6% to 29.6%. Following oral administration, the interindividual difference between maximum and minimum complete vomiting inhibition rates ranged from 0.2% to 16.1%. After intravenous administration, that difference ranged from 0.8% to 52.5%.. Interindividual differences in the clinical effects of 5-HT(3) receptor antagonists could be evaluated based on receptor occupancy theory, and the differences varied among drugs. Drug selection considering these individual variations might be useful for the patients who experienced vomiting associated with chemotherapy.

Topics: Antiemetics; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzimidazoles; Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic; Drug Administration Schedule; Granisetron; Humans; Indoles; Models, Theoretical; Ondansetron; Oxazines; Serotonin 5-HT3 Receptor Antagonists; Treatment Outcome; Tropisetron; Vomiting