trandolaprilat has been researched along with quinaprilat* in 2 studies
2 other study(ies) available for trandolaprilat and quinaprilat
Article | Year |
---|---|
Protective effects of quinaprilat and trandolaprilat, active metabolites of quinapril and trandolapril, on hemolysis induced by lysophosphatidylcholine in human erythrocytes.
We examined the effects of the angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors captopril, enalaprilat, quinapril, and trandolapril, and their active metabolites quinaprilat and trandolaprilat, on hemolysis induced by lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC) in human erythrocytes. LPC induced hemolysis at the concentrations above the critical micelle concentration (4 microM). Propranolol, used as a reference drug, attenuated the 50% hemolysis induced by 6 microM LPC at concentrations ranging from 100 nM to 100 microM. Similarly, quinaprilat (10 microM) and trandolaprilat (10, 100 microM) significantly attenuated the LPC-induced hemolysis, but other ACE inhibitors did not. Since propranolol possesses a membrane stabilizing action correlated with high lipophilicity, it appears that the high lipophilicity of quinaprilat or trandolaprilat is responsible for the protection from the damage induced by LPC. However, quinapril and trandolapril were not effective, although both drugs have higher lipophilicity than quinaprilat and trandolaprilat. Hence, it is suggested that the high lipophilicity alone may not contribute to the protective effects of ACE inhibitors against LPC-induced hemolysis. None of ACE inhibitors attenuated the hypotonic hemolysis (60 mM NaCl), although propranolol did. Furthermore, neither propranolol (100 microM) nor quinaprilat (50 microM) and trandolaprilat (50 microM) affected LPC micelle formation, suggesting that these drugs do not directly bind to LPC. We therefore believe that the protective effects of quinaprilat and trandolaprilat on the LPC-induced hemolysis may be related physicochemically to their highly lipophilic and ACE inhibitory structures, which probably maintain erythrocyte membrane integrity by a mechanism other than ACE inhibition, prevention of LPC micelle formation or protection against osmotic imbalance. Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Hemolysis; Humans; Hypotonic Solutions; In Vitro Techniques; Indoles; Lysophosphatidylcholines; Micelles; Propranolol; Quinapril; Sodium Chloride; Tetrahydroisoquinolines | 2003 |
Compared properties of trandolapril, enalapril, and their diacid metabolites.
The effects of 14-day trandolapril or enalapril treatment of spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs) were studied on blood pressure and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) activity measured ex vivo in various organs. Both ACE inhibitors caused dose-dependent decreases in blood pressure and ACE activity, trandolapril being 30- and 400- to 1,000-fold more active than enalapril on blood pressure and ACE activity, respectively. However, comparison of ACE inhibitory activities of the diacid forms of trandolapril and enalapril, i.e., trandolaprilat and enalaprilat, measured in vitro on various tissues, showed that trandolaprilat was only three- to fivefold more active than enalaprilat. To understand the reasons for such discrepancies between ex vivo effects of ACE inhibitors and in vitro actions of their diacid metabolites, we measured the lipophilicities of the compounds and investigated the possibility that trandolapril could display an ACE inhibitory effect by itself. Trandolaprilat was found to be far more lipophilic than enalaprilat, as shown by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography studies performed at pH 7.4 (log kw7.4 = 1.487 vs. 0.108). In addition, trandolapril was practically as active in vitro as its diacid metabolite (IC50 = 2.5 vs. 1.35 nM) in inhibiting ACE activity in the aorta, whereas enalapril was practically devoid of any effect (IC50 = 240 nM). Measurements of relative affinities of inhibitors or metabolites for purified human renal ACE showed that trandolapril displayed about 20% of the affinity of its diacid metabolite (IC50 = 15 vs. 3.2 nM); enalaprilat affinity (34 nM) was within the same range as those of trandolapril and trandolaprilat, whereas enalapril displayed a very low affinity for the purified enzyme (IC50 = 50 microM).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) Topics: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Animals; Blood Pressure; Enalapril; Enalaprilat; Indoles; Isoquinolines; Male; Peptidyl-Dipeptidase A; Rats; Rats, Inbred SHR; Solubility; Tetrahydroisoquinolines | 1994 |