topiramate and remacemide

Novel antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are thought to act on voltage-sensitive ion channels, on inhibitory neurotransmission or on excitatory neurotransmission. Two successful examples of rational AED design that potentiate GABA-mediated inhibition are vigabatrin (VGB) by irreversible inhibition of GABA-transaminase, and tiagabine (TGB) by blocking GABA uptake. Lamotrigine (LTG) prolongs inactivation of voltage-dependent sodium channels. The anticonvulsant action of remacemide (RCM) is probably largely due to blockade of NMDA receptors and prolonged inactivation of sodium channels induced by its desglycinated metabolite. Felbamate (FBM) apparently blocks NMDA receptors, potentiates GABA-mediated responses, blocks L-type calcium channels, and possibly also prolongs sodium channel inactivation. Similarly, topiramate (TPM) has multiple probable sites of action, including sodium channels, GABA receptors, and glutamate (AMPA) receptors. Gabapentin (GBP) apparently has a completely novel type of action, probably involving potentiation of GABA-mediated inhibition and possibly also inactivation of sodium channels. The therapeutic advantages of the novel AEDs are as yet only partially explained by our present understanding of their mechanisms of action.

Topics: 4-Aminobutyrate Transaminase; Acetamides; Acetates; Amines; Animals; Anticonvulsants; Cyclohexanecarboxylic Acids; Epilepsy; Felbamate; Fructose; Gabapentin; gamma-Aminobutyric Acid; Humans; Ion Channels; Lamotrigine; Membrane Potentials; Mice; Neurotransmitter Agents; Nipecotic Acids; Phenethylamines; Phenylcarbamates; Propylene Glycols; Rats; Receptors, AMPA; Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate; Synaptic Transmission; Tiagabine; Topiramate; Triazines; Vigabatrin

Epilepsy is one of the most common neurological disorders. Even though existing antiepileptic drugs can render 80% of newly diagnosed patients seizure free, a significant number of patients have chronic intractable epilepsy causing disability with considerable socioeconomic implications. There is, therefore, a need for more potent and effective antiepileptic drugs and drugs with fewer adverse effects, particularly CNS effects. Drugs for the treatment of partial seizures are particularly needed. With major advances in our understanding of the basic neuropathology, neuropharmacology and neurophysiology of epilepsy, numerous candidate novel antiepileptic drugs have been developed in recent years. This review comparatively evaluates the pharmacokinetics, efficacy and adverse effects of 12 new antiepileptic drugs namely vigabatrin, lamotrigine, gabapentin, oxcarbazepine, felbamate, tiagabine, eterobarb, zonisamide, remacemide, stiripentol, topiramate and levetiracetam (ucb-L059). Of the 12 drugs, vigabatrin, lamotrigine and gabapentin have recently been marketed in the UK. Five of these new drugs have known mechanisms of action (vigabatrin, lamotrigine, tiagabine, oxcarbazepine and eterobarb), which may provide for a more rational approach to the treatment of epilepsy. Oxcarbazepine, remacemide and eterobarb are prodrugs. Vigabatrin, gabapentin and topiramate are more promising on the basis of their pharmacokinetic characteristics in that they are excreted mainly unchanged in urine and not susceptible to significant pharmacokinetic interactions. In contrast, lamotrigine, felbamate and stiripentol exhibit significant drug interactions. Essentially, all the drugs are effective in partial or secondarily generalised seizures and are effective to varying degrees in other seizure types. Particularly welcome is the possible effectiveness of zonisamide in myoclonus and felbamate in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. In relation to adverse effects, CNS effects are observed with all drugs, however, gabapentin, remacemide and levetiracetam appear to exhibit least. There is also the possibility of rational duotherapy, using drugs with known mechanisms of action, as an additional therapeutic approach. The efficacy of these 12 antiepileptic drug occurs despite the fact that candidate antiepileptic drugs are evaluated under highly unfavourable conditions, namely as add-on therapy in patients refractory to drug management and with high seizure frequency. Thus, whilst candidate drugs wh

Topics: Acetamides; Acetates; Amines; Anticonvulsants; Carbamazepine; Cyclohexanecarboxylic Acids; Dioxolanes; Epilepsy; Felbamate; Fructose; Gabapentin; gamma-Aminobutyric Acid; Humans; Isoxazoles; Lamotrigine; Levetiracetam; Nipecotic Acids; Oxcarbazepine; Phenobarbital; Phenylcarbamates; Piracetam; Propylene Glycols; Risk Factors; Tiagabine; Topiramate; Triazines; Vigabatrin; Zonisamide

During the past few years a major increase has taken place in the number of drugs which have become available in the antiepileptic arsenal. In fact, 3 new antiepileptic drugs, vigabatrin, oxcarbazepine and lamotrigine, were recently approved in several European countries. Two other drugs, felbamate and gabapentin, are expected to be approved in the US in the near future. This review comparatively evaluates the pharmacokinetics of the following 10 new antiepileptic drugs: felbamate, flunarizine, gabapentin, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, remacemide, stiripentol, tiagabine, topiramate and vigabatrin. Three of the new drugs, gabapentin, topiramate and vigabatrin, are more promising on the basis of their pharmacokinetic features. They are well absorbed, excreted mainly unchanged in the urine, and are not susceptible to enzyme induction or inhibition. Their drug interaction potential appears to be minimal. About 50% of felbamate is excreted unchanged, with the rest eliminated by metabolism. The remaining drugs are eliminated by metabolic processes such as glucuronidation (lamotrigine), deglycine formation (remacemide) or oxidative metabolism (flunarizine and stiripentol). Oxcarbazepine and remacemide have high hepatic clearance and are biotransformed to hydroxy and deglycine metabolites, respectively, with the activity of their metabolites contributing to the antiepileptic activity of the parent drug after oral administration, despite high first-pass effect metabolism. Gabapentin and oxcarbazepine do not behave pharmacokinetically as their original design intended. Gabapentin is not effective as a chemical drug delivery system for gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), and oxcarbazepine serves as a prodrug to its hydroxy metabolite, but does not act as a drug on its own. Nevertheless, these 2 agents demonstrate efficacy in extensive preclinical and clinical trials. Although the pharmacokinetics features of these drugs are important, these features are secondary to their pharmacodynamic properties--i.e. to the requirement that new antiepileptic drugs have to have proven clinical efficacy and safety in epileptic patients.

Topics: Acetamides; Acetates; Amines; Aminocaproates; Anticonvulsants; Carbamazepine; Cyclohexanecarboxylic Acids; Dioxolanes; Felbamate; Flunarizine; Fructose; Gabapentin; gamma-Aminobutyric Acid; Humans; Lamotrigine; Nipecotic Acids; Oxcarbazepine; Phenylcarbamates; Propylene Glycols; Tiagabine; Topiramate; Triazines; Vigabatrin