tiotropium-bromide and vilanterol

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Adult; Benzyl Alcohols; Bronchodilator Agents; Chlorobenzenes; Drug Combinations; Dyspnea; Forced Expiratory Volume; Glycopyrrolate; Humans; Muscarinic Antagonists; Network Meta-Analysis; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinuclidines; Salmeterol Xinafoate; Tiotropium Bromide; Treatment Outcome

Maintenance bronchodilator therapy with long-acting β-agonists (LABAs) and long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) is the cornerstone treatment for patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) of LABA/LAMA are recommended for the majority of symptomatic COPD patients by global guidelines; regional guidelines such as the Japanese and Korean guidelines also provide similar recommendations for the use of LABA/LAMA FDCs. This review comprehensively describes the latest clinical evidence from key studies on the efficacy and safety of four approved LABA/LAMA fixed-dose combinations: indacaterol/glycopyrronium, vilanterol/umeclidinium, formoterol/aclidinium, and olodaterol/tiotropium. Additionally, in this review we describe the rationale behind the use of LABA/LAMA FDC therapy, key findings from the preclinical and clinical trial evaluation of respective LABA and LAMA monocomponents, and the efficacy and safety of LABA/LAMA FDCs. Special emphasis is placed on the clinical evidence for the monocomponents and LABA/LAMA FDCs from the Asian population. This detailed overview of the efficacy and safety of LABA/LAMA FDCs in global and Asian COPD patients is envisaged to provide a better understanding of the benefits of these therapies and to inform healthcare providers and patients on their appropriate use.Funding: Novartis Pharma K.K.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Asian People; Benzoxazines; Benzyl Alcohols; Bronchodilator Agents; Chlorobenzenes; Drug Combinations; Formoterol Fumarate; Glycopyrrolate; Humans; Indans; Muscarinic Antagonists; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinolones; Quinuclidines; Tiotropium Bromide; Treatment Outcome; Tropanes

Recent updates to the GOLD guidelines emphasize the use of combination LABA and LAMA bronchodilators for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with persistent dyspnea despite monotherapy or frequent exacerbations despite LAMA monotherapy. There are several commercially available LABA/LAMA fixed dose combination inhalers, which are likely to become the principle therapy for many patients with COPD.. In the last 4 years, there have been a number of large clinical trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of combined LAMA and LABA bronchodilators. LAMA/LABA fixed dose combination therapies have consistently demonstrated clinically significant improvements to airway obstruction, dyspnea, and quality of life whenever compared with placebo, and more modest improvements compared with bronchodilator monotherapies and combined bronchodilator/inhaled corticosteroid therapy.. New guidelines emphasize combination bronchodilators as a mainstay of therapy for many patients with symptomatic COPD and there are several new combination bronchodilator therapies available to patients. It is important for physicians and patients to understand the range and degree of expected clinical effects and the safety profiles of these new medications.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Benzoxazines; Benzyl Alcohols; Bronchodilator Agents; Chlorobenzenes; Delayed-Action Preparations; Drug Combinations; Formoterol Fumarate; Glycopyrrolate; Humans; Indans; Muscarinic Antagonists; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinolones; Quinuclidines; Tiotropium Bromide; Tropanes

In this review, we focused on original manuscripts published in the 2017 that provided additional information on the clinical and therapeutic features of the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We have chosen eight of these studies, collected in four topics concerning the pharmacological treatment (tiotropium) of mild-moderate patients, the pharmacological (fluticasone furoate/vilanterol/umeclidinium) and non-pharmacological treatment (non-invasive mechanical ventilation) of severe patients, the etiology of acute exacerbation of COPD involving seasonal airway pathogens and the role of eosinophils with particular interest to the monoclonal antibody directed against interleukin-5 (mepolizumab). For each topic, we report a brief description of studies, take-home messages, and brief comments.

Topics: Androstadienes; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Benzyl Alcohols; Bronchodilator Agents; Chlorobenzenes; Common Cold; Disease Progression; Drug Combinations; Eosinophils; Glucocorticoids; Haemophilus Infections; Humans; Interleukin-5; Moraxellaceae Infections; Muscarinic Antagonists; Noninvasive Ventilation; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinuclidines; Seasons; Severity of Illness Index; Tiotropium Bromide

Several new fixed-dose combination bronchodilators have been launched in the world, and 3 different types are now available in Japan. Assessing their efficacy relative to each other has not been performed yet. In the present manuscript, characteristics of glycopyrronium/indacaterol, umeclidinium/vilanterol and tiotropium/olodaterol were reviewed. In particular, changes in trough and peak forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total scores, and transitional dyspnea index (TDI) focal scores were reviewed in these bronchodilators.

Topics: Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Benzoxazines; Benzyl Alcohols; Bronchodilator Agents; Chlorobenzenes; Delayed-Action Preparations; Drug Combinations; Forced Expiratory Volume; Glycopyrrolate; Humans; Indans; Muscarinic Antagonists; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinolones; Quinuclidines; Respiratory Function Tests; Tiotropium Bromide; Treatment Outcome

COPD guidelines recommend the combined use of inhaled long-acting β2-agonists (LABAs) and long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) if symptoms are not improved by a single agent. This systematic review tested the hypothesis that the bronchodilator effect of the LABA/LAMA combination, umeclidinium (UMEC)/vilanterol (VIL), would translate into better outcomes without incurring increased adverse events (AEs).. This was a systematic review of randomized, placebo-controlled or crossover trials (> 4 weeks) involving UMEC/VIL compared with its monocomponents, tiotropium, or fluticasone/salmeterol. Primary outcomes were trough FEV1, serious adverse events (SAEs), and serious cardiovascular events (SCVEs).. Eleven trials from 10 studies (9,609 patients) showed that UMEV/VIL provided superior improvements in lung function compared with UMEC, VIL, tiotropium, and fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (mean trough FEV1, 60, 110, 90, and 90 mL, respectively; P < .0001). Also, UMEC/VIL had a greater likelihood of demonstrating a minimal clinically important difference on the Transition Dyspnea Index compared with UMEC and VIL (number needed to treat for benefit [NNTB] = 14 and 10, respectively). UMEC/VIL therapy significantly reduced the risk of COPD exacerbations compared with UMEC and VIL (NNTB = 42 and 41, respectively). On the contrary, we noted no significant differences between UMEC/VIL and tiotropium with respect to dyspnea, health status, or risk of COPD exacerbation. Regarding safety issues, the incidence of AEs, SAEs, SCVEs, and mortality on treatment was similar across treatments, suggesting reduced safety concerns with the use of the UMEC/VIL combination.. Once-daily inhaled UMEC/VIL showed superior efficacy compared with its monocomponents, tiotropium, and fluticasone/combination in patients with moderate to severe COPD.

Topics: Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Albuterol; Androstadienes; Benzyl Alcohols; Chlorobenzenes; Drug Combinations; Fluticasone-Salmeterol Drug Combination; Humans; Muscarinic Antagonists; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinuclidines; Scopolamine Derivatives; Tiotropium Bromide; Treatment Outcome

Increasing evidence suggests pharmacological treatments may impact on overall survival in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients. Individual clinical trials are rarely powered to detect mortality differences between treatments and may not include all treatment options relevant to healthcare decision makers.. A systematic review was conducted to identify RCTs of COPD treatments reporting mortality; evidence was synthesised using network meta-analysis (NMA). The analysis included 40 RCTs; a quantitative indirect comparison between 14 treatments using data from 55,220 patients was conducted.. The analysis reported two treatments reducing all-cause mortality; salmeterol/fluticasone propionate combination (SFC) was associated with a reduction in mortality versus placebo in the fixed effects (HR 0.79; 95 % Crl 0.67, 0.94) but not the random effects model (0.79; 0.56, 1.09). Indacaterol was associated with a reduction in mortality versus placebo in fixed (0.28; 0.08 to 0.85) and random effects (0.29; 0.08, 0.89) models. Mean estimates and credible intervals for hazard ratios for indacaterol versus placebo are based on a small number of events; estimates may change when the results of future studies are included. These results were maintained across a variety of assumptions and provide evidence that SFC and indacaterol may lead to improved survival in COPD patients.. Results of an NMA of COPD treatments suggest that SFC and indacaterol may reduce mortality. Further research is warranted to strengthen this conclusion.

Topics: Albuterol; Aminopyridines; Beclomethasone; Benzamides; Benzyl Alcohols; Bronchodilator Agents; Budesonide; Chlorobenzenes; Cyclopropanes; Fluticasone-Salmeterol Drug Combination; Formoterol Fumarate; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Indans; Ipratropium; Proportional Hazards Models; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinolones; Survival Rate; Theophylline; Tiotropium Bromide; Triamcinolone

Combinations of two long-acting bronchodilators and long-acting bronchodilators with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are recommended therapies in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Three fixed-dose combination products have recently been approved for the treatment of COPD (the long-acting β2-agonist plus long-acting muscarinic antagonist [LABA/LAMA] combinations glycopyrronium/indacaterol [QVA149] and umeclidinium/vilanterol, and the LABA/ICS fluticasone furoate/vilanterol), with others currently in late-stage development. LABA/LAMA and LABA/ICS combination therapies demonstrate positive effects on both lung function and patient-reported outcomes, with significant improvements observed with LABA/LAMA combinations compared with placebo, each component alone and other comparators in current use. No new safety concerns have been observed with combinations of long-acting bronchodilators. Combinations of two long-acting bronchodilators represent a new and convenient treatment option in COPD. This review summarizes published efficacy and safety data from clinical trials of both LABA/LAMA and novel LABA/ICS combinations in patients with COPD.

Topics: Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Adrenergic beta-Agonists; Albuterol; Benzyl Alcohols; Bronchodilator Agents; Chlorobenzenes; Disease Management; Disease Progression; Drug Combinations; Ethanolamines; Formoterol Fumarate; Glycopyrrolate; Humans; Indans; Muscarinic Antagonists; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinolones; Quinuclidines; Salmeterol Xinafoate; Scopolamine Derivatives; Tiotropium Bromide; Treatment Outcome

UMEC/VI was associated with small improvements in QALYs (+ 0.029) over a 3-year time horizon, compared with TIO/OLO, alongside cost savings of €393/patient. The ITT scenario analysis and sensitivity analyses had similar results. All probabilistic simulations resulted in UMEC/VI being less costly and more effective than TIO/OLO.

Topics: Aged; Benzoxazines; Benzyl Alcohols; Chlorobenzenes; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Cross-Over Studies; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; National Health Programs; Prospective Studies; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinuclidines; Single-Blind Method; Spain; Tiotropium Bromide

Dual bronchodilator therapy is reserved as a second-line treatment in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and provides benefits in lung function and health status versus monotherapy. The aim of this study was to determine whether early initiation of a dual bronchodilator versus monotherapy reduced the risk of deterioration in COPD.. This post hoc pooled analysis investigated the efficacy and safety of umeclidinium/vilanterol (UMEC/VI) 62.5/25 mcg/day compared with tiotropium (TIO) 18 mcg/day in a maintenance-naïve (MN) subgroup of patients relative to the intent-to-treat (ITT) population from three 6-month active comparator studies (n = 1747). Other treatment arms (UMEC/VI 125/25, VI 25 and UMEC 125) comprised 850 patients in total but were not included in this analysis. The primary endpoint was trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV. Early use of dual-bronchodilator therapy has superior efficacy on lung function and may reduce the risk of short-term deterioration compared to monotherapy in symptomatic patients with COPD.. GSK analysis 202066 (NCT01316900/DB2113360, NCT01316913/DB2113374, NCT01777334/ZEP117115).. This study was funded by GSK.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Benzyl Alcohols; Bronchodilator Agents; Chlorobenzenes; Double-Blind Method; Female; Forced Expiratory Volume; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinuclidines; Tiotropium Bromide; Treatment Outcome

Fluticasone furoate/vilanterol (FF/VI) is a novel, once-daily, inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β2-agonist combination approved for the treatment of COPD and asthma. We compared the safety and efficacy of FF/VI and tiotropium (TIO) in subjects with moderate-to-severe COPD with greater risk for comorbid cardiovascular disease (CVD).. This randomized, blinded, double-dummy, parallel-group study compared a once-daily morning dose of FF/VI 100/25 mcg delivered via ELLIPTA™ with TIO 18 mcg via HandiHaler(®) for 12 weeks in subjects with diagnosed COPD, forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) 30%-70% predicted, and CVD or CVD risk. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in 24-hour weighted mean FEV1 on Day 84. Other efficacy endpoints included time to onset of bronchodilation, trough FEV1, other spirometry measures, rescue medication use, symptoms, quality of life (St George's Respiratory Questionnaire-COPD [SGRQ-C]), and health status (COPD Assessment Tests [CAT]) measures. Safety endpoints included cardiovascular monitoring, cortisol excretion, COPD exacerbations, and adverse events, including prespecified drug effects.. Both FF/VI and TIO improved the 24-hour weighted mean FEV1 from baseline after 12 weeks with no significant difference between treatments. Other endpoints favored FF/VI for time to onset of bronchodilation, rescue medication use, dyspnea, SGRQ-C and CAT scores, or favored TIO for change from baseline in forced vital capacity and inspiratory capacity. Pneumonia occurred more frequently in the FF/VI group, and two TIO-treated subjects died following cardiovascular events. Other safety measures were similar between groups, and cardiovascular monitoring did not reveal increased CVD risk.. Both FF/VI and TIO were efficacious in improving lung function in subjects with COPD and comorbid CVD or CVD risk factors, with minor differences in efficacy and safety profiles.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adult; Aged; Androstadienes; Benzyl Alcohols; Bronchodilator Agents; Cardiovascular Diseases; Chlorobenzenes; Drug Combinations; Drug Monitoring; Female; Forced Expiratory Volume; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quality of Life; Symptom Assessment; Tiotropium Bromide; Treatment Outcome

The fixed-dose, long-acting bronchodilator combination of umeclidinium/vilanterol (UMEC/VI) has not previously been compared with a combination of a long-acting muscarinic antagonist and long-acting β2-agonist in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).. This 12-week, randomized, blinded, triple-dummy, parallel-group, non-inferiority study compared once-daily UMEC/VI 62.5/25 mcg with once-daily tiotropium (TIO) 18 mcg + indacaterol (IND) 150 mcg in patients with moderate-to-very-severe COPD. The primary endpoint was the trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) on day 85 (predefined non-inferiority margin -50 mL), and the secondary endpoint was the 0- to 6-h weighted mean (WM) FEV1 on day 84. Other efficacy endpoints [including rescue medication use, the Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI) focal score, and the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) score] and safety endpoints [adverse events (AEs), vital signs, and COPD exacerbations] were also assessed.. Trough FEV1 improvements were comparable between treatment groups [least squares (LS) mean changes from baseline to day 85: UMEC/VI 172 mL; TIO + IND 171 mL; treatment difference 1 mL; 95 % confidence interval (CI) -29 to 30 mL], demonstrating non-inferiority between UMEC/VI and TIO + IND. The treatments produced similar improvements in the trough FEV1 at other study visits and the 0- to 6-h WM FEV1 (LS mean changes at day 84: UMEC/VI 235 mL; TIO + IND 258 mL; treatment difference -23 mL; 95 % CI -54 to 8 mL). The results for patient-reported measures (rescue medication use, TDI focal score, and SGRQ score) were comparable; both treatments produced clinically meaningful improvements in TDI and SGRQ scores. The incidence of AEs and COPD exacerbations, and changes in vital signs were similar for the two treatments.. UMEC/VI and TIO + IND, given once daily, provided similar improvements in lung function and patient-reported outcomes over 12 weeks in patients with COPD, with comparable tolerability and safety profiles.. ClinicalTrials.gov study ID NCT02257385; GSK study no. 116961.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Benzyl Alcohols; Bronchodilator Agents; Chlorobenzenes; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Female; Forced Expiratory Volume; Humans; Indans; Male; Middle Aged; Muscarinic Antagonists; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinolones; Quinuclidines; Tiotropium Bromide; Treatment Outcome

Combination long-acting bronchodilator treatment might be more effective than long-acting bronchodilator monotherapy for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of umeclidinium (UMEC) plus vilanterol (VI) with tiotropium (TIO) monotherapy, UMEC monotherapy, or VI monotherapy in patients with moderate to very severe COPD.. In two multicentre, randomised, blinded, double-dummy, parallel-group, active-controlled trials, eligible patients (current or former smokers aged 40 years or older with an established clinical history of COPD) were randomly assigned in 1:1:1:1 ratio to UMEC 125 μg plus VI 25 μg, UMEC 62·5 μg plus VI 25 μg, TIO 18 μg, and either VI 25 μg (study 1) or UMEC 125 μg (study 2). All study drugs were used once daily for 24 weeks. TIO was delivered via the HandiHaler inhaler and all other active treatments were delivered via the ELLIPTA dry powder inhaler. Random assignment (by a validated computer-based system) was done by centre and was not stratified. All patients and physicians were masked to assigned treatment during the studies. The primary efficacy endpoint of both studies was trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) on day 169, which was analysed in the intention-to-treat population. Both studies are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, numbers NCT01316900 (study 1) and NCT01316913 (study 2).. 1141 participants were recruited in study 1, and 1191 in study 2. For study 1, after exclusions, 208, 209, 214, and 212 patients were included in the intention-to-treat analyses for TIO monotherapy, VI monotherapy, UMEC 125 μg plus VI 25 μg, and UMEC 62·5 μg plus VI 25 μg, respectively. For study 2, 215, 222, 215, and 217 patients were included in the intention-to-treat analyses for TIO monotherapy, UMEC monotherapy, UMEC 125 μg plus VI 25 μg, and UMEC 62·5 μg plus VI 25 μg, respectively. In both studies, we noted improvements in trough FEV1 on day 169 for both doses of UMEC plus VI compared with TIO monotherapy (study 1, UMEC 125 μg plus VI 25 μg: 0·088 L [95% CI 0·036 to 0·140; p=0·0010]; study 1, UMEC 62·5 μg plus VI 25 μg: 0·090 L [0·039 to 0·141; p=0·0006]; study 2, UMEC 125 μg plus VI 25 μg: 0·074 L [0·025 to 0·123; p=0·0031]; study 2, UMEC 62·5 μg plus VI 25 μg: 0·060 L [0·010 to 0·109; nominal p=0·0182]). Both doses of UMEC plus VI also improved trough FEV1 compared with VI monotherapy (UMEC 125 μg plus VI 25 μg: 0·088 L [0·036 to 0·140; p=0·0010]; UMEC 62·5 μg plus VI 25 μg: 0·090 L [0·039 to 0·142; p=0·0006], but not compared with UMEC 125 μg monotherapy (UMEC 125 μg plus VI 25 μg: 0·037 L [-0·012 to 0·087; p=0·14]; UMEC 62·5 μg plus VI 25 μg: 0·022 L [-0·027 to 0·072; p=0·38]). All treatments produced improvements in dyspnoea and health-related quality of life; we noted no significant differences in symptoms, health status, or risk of exacerbation between UMEC plus VI and TIO. The most common on-treatment, severe-intensity adverse event in both studies was acute exacerbation of COPD (1-4 [<1-2%] patients across treatment groups in study 1 and 1-6 [<1-3%] patients in study 2). We recorded five to 15 (2-7%) on-treatment serious adverse events across treatment groups in study 1, and nine to 22 (4-10%) in study 2. We noted no substantial changes from baseline in vital signs, clinical laboratory findings, or electrocardiography findings in any of the treatment groups.. Combination treatment with once-daily UMEC plus VI improved lung function compared with VI monotherapy and TIO monotherapy in patients with COPD. Overall our results suggest that the combination of UMEC plus VI could be beneficial for the treatment of moderate to very severe COPD.. GlaxoSmithKline.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Aged; Benzyl Alcohols; Bronchodilator Agents; Chlorobenzenes; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Forced Expiratory Volume; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinuclidines; Scopolamine Derivatives; Time Factors; Tiotropium Bromide; Treatment Outcome

Increased arterial stiffness as measured by aortic pulse wave velocity (aPWV) predicts cardiovascular events and mortality and is elevated in patients with COPD. Prior investigation suggests that a long-acting β-agonist (LABA)/inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) lowers aPWV in patients with baseline aPWV ≥ 11 m/s. This study compared the effect of the ICS/LABA fluticasone furoate/vilanterol (FF/VI), 100/25 μg, delivered via the ELLIPTA dry powder inhaler, with tiotropium bromide (TIO), 18 μg, on aPWV.. This multicenter, randomized, blinded, double-dummy, parallel-group, 12-week study compared FF/VI and TIO, both administered once daily. The primary end point was aPWV change from baseline at 12 weeks. Safety end points included adverse events (AEs), vital signs, and clinical laboratory tests.. Two hundred fifty-seven patients with COPD and aPWV ≥ 11 m/s were randomized; 87% had prior cardiovascular events and/or risk. The mean difference in aPWV between FF/VI and TIO at week 12 was not significant (P = .484). Because the study did not contain a placebo arm, a post hoc analysis was performed to show that both treatments lowered aPWV by an approximate difference of 1 m/s compared with baseline. The proportion of patients reporting AEs was similar with FF/VI (24%) and TIO (18%). There were no changes in clinical concern for vital signs or clinical laboratory tests.. No differences on aPWV were observed between FF/VI and TIO. However, further studies with a placebo arm are required to establish definitively whether long-acting bronchodilators lower aPWV. Both treatments demonstrated an acceptable tolerability profile.. ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT01395888; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Aged; Androstadienes; Benzyl Alcohols; Bronchodilator Agents; Chlorobenzenes; Delayed-Action Preparations; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Pulse Wave Analysis; Respiratory Function Tests; Scopolamine Derivatives; Severity of Illness Index; Tiotropium Bromide; Treatment Outcome; Vascular Stiffness

Combinations of inhaled long-acting bronchodilator therapies such as muscarinic antagonists and β2-agonists may be more effective than monotherapy in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).. This study was a 24-week, Phase III, multicenter, randomized, blinded, double-dummy, parallel-group study of the once-daily, inhaled, fixed-dose combination of the long-acting muscarinic antagonist umeclidinium bromide and the long-acting β2-agonist vilanterol (UMEC/VI 62.5/25 mcg) versus tiotropium (TIO, 18 mcg). The primary endpoint was trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) at Day 169. The secondary endpoint was weighted mean FEV1 over 0–6 h post-dose at Day 168. For key endpoints, a step-down closed testing hierarchy was applied to account for multiplicity. Other efficacy and safety endpoints were assessed.. Statistically significant improvements in trough FEV1 at Day 169 (0.112 L, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.081, 0.144; p < 0.001) and weighted mean FEV1 over 0–6 h post-dose at Day 168 (0.105 L, 95% CI: 0.071, 0.140; p < 0.001) were observed for UMEC/VI versus TIO. In addition UMEC/VI improved health-related quality of life, and reduced requirement for the use of rescue medication compared with TIO. The incidence of adverse events was similar between treatment groups.. UMEC/VI was associated with statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in lung function versus TIO. UMEC/VI was well tolerated. UMEC/VI 62.5/25 mcg could provide an effective new treatment option for patients with moderate-to-very severe COPD.

Topics: Aged; Benzyl Alcohols; Bronchodilator Agents; Chlorobenzenes; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Female; Forced Expiratory Volume; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quality of Life; Quinuclidines; Scopolamine Derivatives; Tiotropium Bromide; Treatment Outcome

ATS and GOLD guidelines recommend treating low-exacerbation risk COPD patients with dual (LAMA/LABA) agents and reserving triple therapy (TT; LAMA/LABA and inhaled corticosteroids [ICS]) for severe cases with higher-exacerbation risk. However, TT often is prescribed across the COPD spectrum. This study compared COPD exacerbations, pneumonia diagnosis, healthcare resource utilization, and costs for patients initiating tiotropium bromide/olodaterol (TIO/OLO) and a TT, fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI), stratified by exacerbation history.. COPD patients who initiated TIO/OLO or FF/UMEC/VI between 06/01/2015-11/30/2019 (index date=first pharmacy fill-date with ≥30 consecutive treatment days) were identified from the Optum Research Database. Patients were ≥40 years old and continuously enrolled for 12 months during the baseline period and ≥30 days during follow-up. Patients were stratified into GOLD A/B (0-1 baseline non-hospitalized exacerbation), No exacerbation (subset of GOLD A/B), and GOLD C/D (≥2 non-hospitalized and/or ≥1 hospitalized baseline exacerbation). Baseline characteristics were balanced with propensity score matching (1:1). Adjusted risks of exacerbation, pneumonia diagnosis, and COPD and/or pneumonia-related utilization and costs were evaluated.. Adjusted exacerbation risk was similar in GOLD A/B and No exacerbation subgroups, and lower in GOLD C/D for FF/UMEC/VI versus TIO/OLO initiators (hazard ratio: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.78, 0.98, p=0.020). Adjusted pneumonia risk was similar between cohorts across the GOLD subgroups. Adjusted COPD and/or pneumonia-related population annualized pharmacy costs were significantly higher for FF/UMEC/VI versus TIO/OLO initiators across subgroups, p<0.001. Adjusted COPD and/or pneumonia-related population annualized total healthcare costs were significantly higher for FF/UMEC/VI versus TIO/OLO initiators in the GOLD A/B and No exacerbation, subgroups, p<0.001 (cost ratio [95% CI]: 1.25 [1.13, 1.38] and 1.21 [1.09, 1.36], respectively), but similar in the GOLD C/D subgroup.. These real-world results support ATS and GOLD recommendations for treating low-exacerbation risk COPD patients with dual bronchodilators and TT for more severe, higher-exacerbation risk COPD patients.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adult; Benzyl Alcohols; Bronchodilator Agents; Chlorobenzenes; Drug Combinations; Fluticasone; Humans; Patient Acceptance of Health Care; Pneumonia; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinuclidines; Tiotropium Bromide

This retrospective cohort study used primary care data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum database linked with secondary care administrative data from Hospital Episode Statistics. Patients with a COPD diagnosis at age ≥35 years were included (indexed) following initiation of single-inhaler UMEC/VI or TIO/OLO between July 1, 2015, and September 30, 2019. Outcomes included the number of rescue medication prescriptions at 12-months (primary), and at 6-, 18- and 24-months (secondary), adherence at 6-, 12-, 18- and 24-months post-index, defined as proportion of days covered ≥80% (secondary), and time-to-initiation of triple therapy (exploratory). Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to balance potential confounding baseline characteristics. Superiority of UMEC/VI versus TIO/OLO for the primary outcome of rescue medication prescriptions was assessed using an intention-to-treat analysis with a p-value < 0.05.. In total, 8603 patients were eligible (UMEC/VI: n = 6536; TIO/OLO: n = 2067). Following IPTW, covariates were well balanced across groups. Patients initiating UMEC/VI had statistically significantly fewer (mean [standard deviation]; p-value) rescue medication prescriptions versus TIO/OLO in both the unweighted (4.84 [4.78] vs 5.68 [5.00]; p < 0.001) and weighted comparison (4.91 [4.81] vs 5.48 [5.02]; p = 0.0032) at 12 months; consistent results were seen at all timepoints. Adherence was numerically higher for TIO/OLO versus UMEC/VI at all timepoints. Time-to-triple therapy was similar between treatment groups.. UMEC/VI was superior to TIO/OLO in reducing rescue medication prescriptions at 12 months after treatment initiation in a primary care cohort in England, potentially suggesting improvements in symptom control with UMEC/VI compared with TIO/OLO.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adult; Benzyl Alcohols; Bronchodilator Agents; Chlorobenzenes; Drug Combinations; Drug Prescriptions; Forced Expiratory Volume; Humans; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinuclidines; Retrospective Studies; Tiotropium Bromide; Treatment Outcome

Long-acting beta-agonists (LABA) and long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA) combination therapy improved lung function and health-related quality-of-life and reduced exacerbation rates and dyspnea in symptomatic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. We compared the real-world effects of three fixed-dose LABA/LAMA combinations for COPD in Taiwan.. This multicenter, retrospective study evaluated 1-year outcomes after LABA/LAMA combination therapy in patients with symptomatic COPD. Exacerbations and symptoms of COPD, lung functions, and therapy escalation were compared among patients using tiotropium/olodaterol, umeclidinium/vilanterol and indacaterol/glycopyrronium. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to balance the baseline characteristics.. Data of 1,617 patients were collected. After PSM, time to first moderate-to-severe COPD exacerbation was comparable among three groups, while the annualized rates of the exacerbation (episodes/patient/year) in patients receiving tiotropium/olodaterol (0.19) or umeclidinium/vilanterol (0.17) were significantly lower than those receiving indacaterol/glycopyrronium (0.38). COPD-related symptoms were stable over the treatment period, and there was no significant difference in the changes of symptom scores including CAT and mMRC among three groups at the end of the study period.. This study presented valuable real-world outcome in terms of exacerbation and treatment response of COPD patients treated with fixed-dose LABA/LAMA regimens in Taiwan. The annualized rates of moderate-to-severe exacerbation in patients receiving tiotropium/olodaterol or umeclidinium/vilanterol were significantly lower than those receiving indacaterol/glycopyrronium, though the time to first moderate-to-severe exacerbation was similar among different fixed-dose LABA/LAMA combinations.

Topics: Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Benzoxazines; Benzyl Alcohols; Bronchodilator Agents; Chlorobenzenes; Drug Combinations; Glycopyrrolate; Humans; Indans; Muscarinic Antagonists; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinolones; Quinuclidines; Retrospective Studies; Taiwan; Tiotropium Bromide; Treatment Outcome

Adherence to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) maintenance medication is important for managing symptoms and exacerbation risk, and is associated with reduced mortality, hospitalizations, and costs. This study compared on-treatment exacerbations, medical costs, and medication adherence in patients with COPD initiating treatment with umeclidinium/vilanterol (UMEC/VI) or tiotropium (TIO).. Each cohort included 3929 matched patients. Kaplan-Meier rates of on-treatment COPD-related exacerbations were similar between cohorts (hazard ratio at 12 months; overall: 0.93, moderate: 0.92, severe: 1.07; all p > 0.05). UMEC/VI versus TIO initiators had significantly higher adherence (mean PDC: 0.44 vs 0.37; p < 0.001; proportion with PDC ≥ 0.8: 22.0% vs 16.4%; p< 0.001) and significantly lower mean on-treatment COPD-related total medical costs ($867 vs $1095 PPPM; p = 0.028), driven by lower outpatient visit costs.. These findings provide valuable information for physicians considering UMEC/VI or TIO as initial maintenance therapy options for patients with COPD.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Benzyl Alcohols; Bronchodilator Agents; Chlorobenzenes; Databases, Factual; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Logistic Models; Male; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Muscarinic Antagonists; Propensity Score; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinuclidines; Retrospective Studies; Time-to-Treatment; Tiotropium Bromide; United States

Retrospective study of patients with COPD enrolled in a US health insurance plan during 2013-2015 and newly initiated on TIO or UMEC/VI. Patients were ≥40 years of age at index (date of therapy initiation) with continuous enrollment for 12 months pre-index and ≥30 days post-index. LAMA users were propensity score matched 1:1 to LAMA/LABA users, with TT initiation rates reported by cohort using pharmacy claims.. 35,357 patients initiating on TIO and 2407 patients initiating on UMEC/VI were identified. After propensity score matching, the rate of TT initiation was significantly higher in new TIO users (n = 1320) than in new UMEC/VI users (n = 1320) (0.92 vs 0.49 per 100 months of exposure, respectively; p < 0.001). Relative to the UMEC/VI cohort, the TIO cohort had an 87% higher risk of TT initiation (hazard ratio: 1.87; 95% confidence interval: 1.4-2.5; p = 0.001).. Patients receiving UMEC/VI progressed to TT more slowly, and were at lower risk of progressing to TT, than patients receiving TIO.

Topics: Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Benzyl Alcohols; Chlorobenzenes; Delayed-Action Preparations; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Muscarinic Antagonists; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinuclidines; Retrospective Studies; Tiotropium Bromide; Treatment Outcome

The objective of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of maintenance treatment with UMEC/VI compared with tiotropium (TIO) 18 μg, open dual LAMA + LABA treatment, or no long-acting bronchodilator treatment in patients with moderate to very severe COPD.. A Markov model was developed to estimate the costs and outcomes associated with UMEC/VI treatment in patients with moderate to very severe COPD (GSK study number: HO-13-13411). Clinical efficacy, costs, utilities, and mortality obtained from the published literature were used as the model inputs. Costs are presented in US dollars based on 2015 prices. The model outputs are total costs, drug costs, other medical costs, number of COPD exacerbations, and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Costs and outcomes were discounted at a 3% annual rate. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the effects of changing parameters on the uncertainty of the results.. UMEC/VI treatment for moderate to very severe COPD was associated with lower lifetime medical costs ($82,344) compared with TIO ($88,822), open dual LAMA + LABA treatment ($114,442), and no long-acting bronchodilator ($86,751). Fewer exacerbations were predicted to occur with UMEC/VI treatment compared with no long-acting bronchodilator treatment. UMEC/VI provided an 0.11 and 0.25 increase in QALYs compared with TIO and no long-acting bronchodilator treatment, and as such, dominated these cost-effectiveness analyses. Sensitivity analyses confirmed that the results were robust.. The results from this model suggest that UMEC/VI treatment would be dominant compared with TIO and no long-acting bronchodilator treatment, and less costly than open dual LAMA + LABA treatment in patients with moderate to very severe COPD.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Benzyl Alcohols; Bronchodilator Agents; Chlorobenzenes; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Combinations; Drug Costs; Humans; Markov Chains; Models, Economic; Muscarinic Antagonists; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Quinuclidines; Severity of Illness Index; Time Factors; Tiotropium Bromide; Treatment Outcome

Umeclidinium/vilanterol (UMEC/VI) is a novel fixed dose combination of a long-acting muscarinic receptor antagonist (LAMA) and a long-acting beta 2 receptor antagonist (LABA) agent. This analysis evaluated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of UMEC/VI compared with tiotropium (TIO), from the Spanish National Health System (NHS) perspective.. A previously published linked equations cohort model based on the epidemiological longitudinal study ECLIPSE (Evaluation of COPD Longitudinally to Identify Predictive Surrogate End-points) was used. Patients included were COPD patients with a post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) ≤70% and the presence of respiratory symptoms measured with the modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale (modified Medical Research Council ≥2). Treatment effect, expressed as change in FEV1 from baseline, was estimated from a 24-week head-to-head phase III clinical trial comparing once-daily UMEC/VI with once-daily TIO and was assumed to last 52 weeks following treatment initiation (maximum duration of UMEC/VI clinical trials). Spanish utility values were derived from a published local observational study. Unitary health care costs (€2015) were obtained from local sources. A 3-year time horizon was selected, and 3% discount was applied to effects and costs. Results were expressed as cost/quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) was performed.. UMEC/VI produced additional 0.03 QALY and €590 vs TIO, leading to an ICER of €21,475/QALY. According to PSA, the probability of UMEC/VI being cost-effective was 80.3% at a willingness-to-pay of €30,000/QALY.. UMEC/VI could be considered as a cost-effective treatment alternative compared with TIO in symptomatic COPD patients from the Spanish NHS perspective.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Aged; Benzyl Alcohols; Bronchodilator Agents; Chlorobenzenes; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Combinations; Female; Forced Expiratory Volume; Humans; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Quinuclidines; Severity of Illness Index; Spain; Symptom Assessment; Tiotropium Bromide; Treatment Outcome

Long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) or long-acting β2-agonist (LABA) bronchodilators and their combination are recommended for the maintenance treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Although the efficacy of LAMAs and LABAs has been well established through randomized controlled trials (RCTs), questions remain regarding their cardiovascular (CV) safety. Furthermore, while the safety of LAMA and LABA monotherapy has been extensively studied, data are lacking for LAMA/LABA combination therapy, and the majority of the studies that have reported on the CV safety of LAMA/LABA combination therapy were not specifically designed to assess this. Evaluation of CV safety for COPD treatments is important because many patients with COPD have underlying CV comorbidities. However, severe CV and other comorbidities are often exclusion criteria for RCTs, contributing to a lack in external validity and generalizability. Real-world observational studies are another important tool to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of COPD therapies in a broader population of patients and can improve upon the external validity limitations of RCTs. We examine what is already known regarding the CV and cerebrovascular safety of LAMA/LABA combination therapy from RCTs and real-world observational studies, and explore the advantages and limitations of data derived from each study type. We also describe an ongoing prospective, observational, comparative post-authorization safety study of a LAMA/LABA combination therapy (umeclidinium/vilanterol) and LAMA monotherapy (umeclidinium) versus tiotropium, with a focus on the relative merits of the study design.

Topics: Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Benzyl Alcohols; Bronchodilator Agents; Cardiovascular Diseases; Chlorobenzenes; Comorbidity; Drug Combinations; Evidence-Based Medicine; Humans; Lung; Muscarinic Antagonists; Patient Safety; Patient Selection; Prospective Studies; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinuclidines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Research Design; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Time Factors; Tiotropium Bromide; Treatment Outcome

Inhaled bronchodilators, including long-acting muscarinic receptor antagonists (LAMA) and long-acting β2-adrenoreceptor agonists (LABA), are the mainstay of pharmacological treatment of stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Among approved LAMA, tiotropium bromide, glycopyrronium bromide, and umeclidinium bromide are administered once daily, whereas aclidinium bromide is administered every 12 h. New LAMA are under development for COPD. Among the approved LABA, indacaterol has a 24 h duration of action, whereas salmeterol and formoterol require twice-daily administration. New once-daily LABA, including vilanterol, olodaterol, milveterol, carmoterol, and abediterol, are in development. LAMA/LABA fixed dose combinations (FDCs) provide the convenience of two bronchodilators with different mechanism of action in a single inhaler. Indacaterol/glycopyrronium, umeclidinium/vilanterol, and olodaterol/tiotropium FDCs have been approved or are under approval and are likely to become a standard pharmacological strategy for COPD. Inhaled dual-pharmacology compounds, combining muscarinic antagonism and β2-agonism (MABA) in a single molecule, potentially provide additive or synergistic bronchodilation over either inhaled antimuscarinic or β2-agonist monotherapy.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Benzyl Alcohols; Bronchodilator Agents; Chlorobenzenes; Humans; Indans; Muscarinic Antagonists; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinolones; Scopolamine Derivatives; Structure-Activity Relationship; Tiotropium Bromide

Topics: Benzyl Alcohols; Chlorobenzenes; Female; Humans; Male; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinuclidines; Scopolamine Derivatives; Tiotropium Bromide

Topics: Anti-Asthmatic Agents; Antibodies, Anti-Idiotypic; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Asthma; Benzyl Alcohols; Biological Products; Chlorobenzenes; Cytokines; Drug Approval; Germany; Humans; Immunoglobulin E; Off-Label Use; Omalizumab; Physician's Role; Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial; Scopolamine Derivatives; Tiotropium Bromide