tiotropium-bromide and indacaterol

Exacerbation frequency is related to disease progression, quality of life, and prognosis in COPD. Earlier diagnosis, along with interventions aimed at preventing exacerbations and delaying progression, may help reduce the global burden of disease. Long-acting inhaled bronchodilators are effective at maintaining symptom relief and are recommended as first-choice therapy for more symptomatic patients and those at risk of exacerbation.. As prevention of exacerbations is a priority goal in COPD management and a number of different long-acting bronchodilators are available, we conducted a systematic review of exacerbation data from randomized controlled trials (published January 2000 to May 2014) comparing the effect of tiotropium versus placebo and/or other maintenance therapies.. Exacerbations were a primary endpoint in 12 publications (five studies: four comparing tiotropium with placebo; one with active comparator) and a secondary endpoint in 17 publications (seven studies: six comparing tiotropium with placebo; one with active comparator). Overall, tiotropium was associated with a longer time to first exacerbation event and fewer exacerbations (including severe exacerbations/hospitalizations) compared with placebo and long-acting β2-agonists. Tiotropium also showed similar efficacy to glycopyrronium and a fixed long-acting muscarinic antagonist/long-acting β2-agonist combination (glycopyrronium/indacaterol), although not all studies were powered to demonstrate differences in exacerbation outcomes. Exacerbation outcomes were comparable with both formulations of tiotropium (HandiHaler(®) 18 μg/Respimat(®) 5 μg).. The results of this comprehensive systematic review demonstrate tiotropium is beneficial in reducing exacerbation risk versus placebo or other maintenance treatments.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Bronchodilator Agents; Cholinergic Antagonists; Glycopyrrolate; Humans; Indans; Muscarinic Antagonists; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinolones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Tiotropium Bromide

Several new fixed-dose combination bronchodilators have been launched in the world, and 3 different types are now available in Japan. Assessing their efficacy relative to each other has not been performed yet. In the present manuscript, characteristics of glycopyrronium/indacaterol, umeclidinium/vilanterol and tiotropium/olodaterol were reviewed. In particular, changes in trough and peak forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total scores, and transitional dyspnea index (TDI) focal scores were reviewed in these bronchodilators.

Topics: Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Benzoxazines; Benzyl Alcohols; Bronchodilator Agents; Chlorobenzenes; Delayed-Action Preparations; Drug Combinations; Forced Expiratory Volume; Glycopyrrolate; Humans; Indans; Muscarinic Antagonists; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinolones; Quinuclidines; Respiratory Function Tests; Tiotropium Bromide; Treatment Outcome

Two once-daily inhaled bronchodilators, indacaterol and tiotropium, are widely used as first-line therapy in stable COPD patients. This study was performed to compare the clinical efficacy and safety between indacaterol and tiotropium in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched to identify all published randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The primary outcome was trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) at week 12. Four RCTs were eligible for inclusion (three RCTs with moderate-to-severe COPD patients and one RCT with only severe COPD patients). Trough FEV₁ at weeks 12 and 26 were not significantly different between indacaterol and tiotropium by the standardized mean difference with 0.014 (95% CI, -0.036, 0.063, I²= 23.5%) and with 0.037 (95% CI, -0.059 to 0.133, I²= 0%) along with differences in means of 0.003L and 0.014L, respectively. Indacaterol and tiotropium also showed similar St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total scores and percentages of patients with SGRQ improvement (≥ 4 units) at week 26. The incidences of nasopharyngitis, serious cardiovascular events, and serious adverse events were not different between indacaterol and tiotropium, while those of cough (OR = 1.68, P < 0.001, and RR = 1.63) and COPD worsening (OR = 1.18, P = 0.003, and RR = 1.12) were higher for indacaterol than tiotropium. However, when one study with only severe COPD patients was removed from the meta-analysis, the difference in the incidence of COPD worsening between indacaterol and tiotropium became non-significant (OR = 1.13, P = 0.204, and RR = 1.09). The clinical efficacy and serious adverse events between indacaterol and tiotropium were equivocal in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD. Cough is a common complaint associated with indacaterol, and COPD worsening needs to be carefully monitored in severe COPD patients when treated with indacaterol.

Topics: Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Bronchodilator Agents; Forced Expiratory Volume; Humans; Indans; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinolones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Tiotropium Bromide; Treatment Outcome

Several new fixed-dose combination bronchodilators have been recently launched, and assessing their efficacy relative to each other, and with open dual combinations is desirable. This network meta-analysis (NMA) assessed the efficacy of umeclidinium and vilanterol (UMEC/VI) with that of available dual bronchodilators in single/separate inhalers.. A systematic literature review identified randomized controlled trials of ≥10 weeks among chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients (≥40 years), assessing the efficacy of combination bronchodilators in single or separate inhalers. Comparative assessment was conducted on change from baseline in trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total scores, transitional dyspnea index (TDI) focal scores, and rescue medication use at 12 weeks and 24 weeks using an NMA within a Bayesian framework.. A systematic literature review identified 77 articles of 26 trials comparing UMEC/VI, indacaterol/glycopyrronium (QVA149), formoterol plus tiotropium (TIO) 18 μg, salmeterol plus TIO, or indacaterol plus TIO, with TIO and placebo as common comparators at 12 weeks and approximately 24 weeks. The NMA showed that at 24 weeks, efficacy of UMEC/VI was not significantly different compared with QVA149 on trough FEV1 (14.1 mL [95% credible interval: -14.2, 42.3]), SGRQ total score (0.18 [-1.28, 1.63]), TDI focal score (-0.30 [-0.73, 0.13]), and rescue medication use (0.02 [-0.27, 0.32]); compared with salmeterol plus TIO on trough FEV1 (67.4 mL [-25.3, 159.4]), SGRQ total score (-0.11 [-1.84, 1.61]), and TDI focal score (0.58 [-0.33, 1.50]); and compared with formoterol plus TIO 18 μg on SGRQ total score (-0.68 [-1.77, 0.39]). Results at week 12 were consistent with week 24 outcomes. Due to lack of availability of evidence, no comparison was made with formoterol plus TIO on FEV1 or TDI at 24 weeks.. UMEC/VI has comparable efficacy to other dual-bronchodilator combinations on available efficacy endpoints.

Topics: Bronchodilator Agents; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy, Combination; Dyspnea; Forced Expiratory Volume; Formoterol Fumarate; Glycopyrrolate; Humans; Indans; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinolones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Salmeterol Xinafoate; Tiotropium Bromide; Treatment Outcome

Long-acting bronchodilators, comprising long-acting beta2-agonists (LABA) and long-acting anti-muscarinic agents (LAMA, principally tiotropium), are commonly used for managing persistent symptoms of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Combining these treatments, which have different mechanisms of action, may be more effective than the individual components. However, the benefits and risks of combining tiotropium and LABAs for the treatment of COPD are unclear.. To compare the relative effects on markers of quality of life, exacerbations, symptoms, lung function and serious adverse events in people with COPD randomised to LABA plus tiotropium versus tiotropium alone; or LABA plus tiotropium versus LABA alone.. We searched the Cochrane Airways Group Specialised Register of trials and ClinicalTrials.gov up to July 2015.. We included parallel-group, randomised controlled trials of three months or longer comparing treatment with tiotropium in addition to LABA against tiotropium or LABA alone for people with COPD.. Two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion and then extracted data on trial quality and the outcome results. We contacted study authors for additional information. We collected information on adverse effects from the trials.. This review included 10 trials on 10,894 participants, mostly recruiting participants with moderate or severe COPD. All of the trials compared tiotropium in addition to LABA to tiotropium alone, and four trials additionally compared LAMA plus LABA with LABA alone. Four studies used the LABA olodaterol, three used indacaterol, two used formoterol, and one used salmeterol.Compared to tiotropium alone, treatment with tiotropium plus LABA resulted in a slightly larger improvement in mean health-related quality of life (St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) (mean difference (MD) -1.34, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.87 to -0.80; 6709 participants; 5 studies). The MD was smaller than the four units that is considered clinically important, but a responder analysis indicated that 7% more participants receiving tiotropium plus LABA had a noticeable benefit (greater than four units) from treatment in comparison to tiotropium alone. In the control arm in one study, which was tiotropium alone, the SGRQ improved by falling 4.5 units from baseline and with tiotropium plus LABA the improvement was a fall of a further 1.3 units (on average). Most of the data came from studies using olodaterol. High withdrawal rates in the trials increased the uncertainty in this result, and the GRADE assessment for this outcome was therefore moderate. There were no significant differences in the other primary outcomes (hospital admission or mortality).The secondary outcome of pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) showed a small mean increase with the addition of LABA over the control arm (MD 0.06, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.07; 9573 participants; 10 studies), which showed a change from baseline ranging from 0.03 L to 0.13 L with tiotropium alone. None of the other secondary outcomes (exacerbations, symptom scores, serious adverse events, and withdrawals) showed any statistically significant differences between the groups. There was moderate heterogeneity for both exacerbations and withdrawals.This review included data on four LABAs: two administered twice daily (salmeterol, formoterol) and two once daily (indacaterol, olodaterol). The results were largely from studies of olodaterol and there was insufficient information to assess whether the other LABAs were equivalent to olodaterol or each other.Comparing LABA plus tiotropium treatment with LABA alone, there was a small but significant improvement in SGRQ (MD -1.25, 95% CI -2.14 to -0.37; 3378 participants; 4 st. The results from this review indicated a small mean improvement in health-related quality of life and FEV1 for participants on a combination of tiotropium and LABA compared to either agent alone, and this translated into a small increase in the number of responders on combination treatment. In addition, adding tiotropium to LABA reduced exacerbations, although adding LABA to tiotropium did not. Hospital admission and mortality were not altered by adding LABA to tiotropium, although there may not be enough data. While it is possible that this is affected by higher attrition in the tiotropium group, one would expect that participants withdrawn from the study would have had less favourable outcomes; this means that the expected direction of attrition bias would be to reduce the estimated benefit of the combination treatment. The results were largely from studies of olodaterol and there was insufficient information to assess whether the other LABAs were equivalent to olodaterol or each other.

Topics: Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Aged; Albuterol; Bronchodilator Agents; Ethanolamines; Formoterol Fumarate; Humans; Indans; Middle Aged; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quality of Life; Quinolones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Salmeterol Xinafoate; Scopolamine Derivatives; Tiotropium Bromide

Increasing evidence suggests pharmacological treatments may impact on overall survival in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients. Individual clinical trials are rarely powered to detect mortality differences between treatments and may not include all treatment options relevant to healthcare decision makers.. A systematic review was conducted to identify RCTs of COPD treatments reporting mortality; evidence was synthesised using network meta-analysis (NMA). The analysis included 40 RCTs; a quantitative indirect comparison between 14 treatments using data from 55,220 patients was conducted.. The analysis reported two treatments reducing all-cause mortality; salmeterol/fluticasone propionate combination (SFC) was associated with a reduction in mortality versus placebo in the fixed effects (HR 0.79; 95 % Crl 0.67, 0.94) but not the random effects model (0.79; 0.56, 1.09). Indacaterol was associated with a reduction in mortality versus placebo in fixed (0.28; 0.08 to 0.85) and random effects (0.29; 0.08, 0.89) models. Mean estimates and credible intervals for hazard ratios for indacaterol versus placebo are based on a small number of events; estimates may change when the results of future studies are included. These results were maintained across a variety of assumptions and provide evidence that SFC and indacaterol may lead to improved survival in COPD patients.. Results of an NMA of COPD treatments suggest that SFC and indacaterol may reduce mortality. Further research is warranted to strengthen this conclusion.

Topics: Albuterol; Aminopyridines; Beclomethasone; Benzamides; Benzyl Alcohols; Bronchodilator Agents; Budesonide; Chlorobenzenes; Cyclopropanes; Fluticasone-Salmeterol Drug Combination; Formoterol Fumarate; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Indans; Ipratropium; Proportional Hazards Models; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinolones; Survival Rate; Theophylline; Tiotropium Bromide; Triamcinolone

Combinations of two long-acting bronchodilators and long-acting bronchodilators with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are recommended therapies in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Three fixed-dose combination products have recently been approved for the treatment of COPD (the long-acting β2-agonist plus long-acting muscarinic antagonist [LABA/LAMA] combinations glycopyrronium/indacaterol [QVA149] and umeclidinium/vilanterol, and the LABA/ICS fluticasone furoate/vilanterol), with others currently in late-stage development. LABA/LAMA and LABA/ICS combination therapies demonstrate positive effects on both lung function and patient-reported outcomes, with significant improvements observed with LABA/LAMA combinations compared with placebo, each component alone and other comparators in current use. No new safety concerns have been observed with combinations of long-acting bronchodilators. Combinations of two long-acting bronchodilators represent a new and convenient treatment option in COPD. This review summarizes published efficacy and safety data from clinical trials of both LABA/LAMA and novel LABA/ICS combinations in patients with COPD.

Topics: Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Adrenergic beta-Agonists; Albuterol; Benzyl Alcohols; Bronchodilator Agents; Chlorobenzenes; Disease Management; Disease Progression; Drug Combinations; Ethanolamines; Formoterol Fumarate; Glycopyrrolate; Humans; Indans; Muscarinic Antagonists; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinolones; Quinuclidines; Salmeterol Xinafoate; Scopolamine Derivatives; Tiotropium Bromide; Treatment Outcome

Tiotropium bromide is an anticholinergic agent that has gained worldwide acceptance as a first-line, once daily maintenance therapy for patients with moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The purpose of this review is to synthesize the evidence base in the past 10 years on the development of tiotropium and its efficacy compared to other able interventions such as long-acting beta agonists (LABAs), as well as to assess its safety profile and its effects on health-related outcomes in patients with COPD. Treatment with tiotropium bromide has generally improved patients' health-related quality of life, reduced the number of patients suffering from acute exacerbations, decreased the number of hospitalizations, improved dyspnea, and reduced adverse events compared to placebo. In the past decade, several studies have examined the safety and efficacy of tiotropium in comparison to placebo and to LABAs (salmeterol, formoterol, and indacaterol) over periods ranging from 3 months to 48 months of follow-up. Head-to-head comparisons of tiotropium 18μg (once daily) with salmeterol 50μg (twice daily) in well-controlled trials demonstrated that tiotropium was superior in reducing acute exacerbation events and in improving quality of life. In a few short-term studies, indacaterol was comparable to tiotropium in its efficacy in improving health-related outcomes. Although the safety record of tiotropium has been exemplary in comparison to placebo, anticholinergic events such as dry mouth can be encountered in some patients. While the long-term safety of tiotropium when delivered in the HandiHaler® has been well documented, its delivery using the Respimat® Soft Mist Inhaler™ was associated with an elevated risk of cardiovascular complications, including increased mortality when compared to placebo. The exact mechanism for this is not known but is being investigated in a large multinational study that will evaluate the long-term safety of different doses of tiotropium delivered by the Respimat® soft mist inhaler versus the HandiHaler®. Further studies are required to investigate the efficacy and safety of tiotropium in comparison with novel LABAs such as indacaterol and vilanterol, and with other emerging novel anticholinergic agents such as aclidinium bromide and NVA237 (glycopyrronium bromide).

Topics: Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Albuterol; Bronchodilator Agents; Dyspnea; Ethanolamines; Formoterol Fumarate; Humans; Indans; Medication Adherence; Mucociliary Clearance; Nebulizers and Vaporizers; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quality of Life; Quinolones; Salmeterol Xinafoate; Scopolamine Derivatives; Tiotropium Bromide

Inhaled bronchodilators are the first-line therapy for COPD. Indacaterol is a novel addition to existing long-acting bronchodilators.. Systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCT) ON efficacy and safety of indacaterol as compared: 1) with placebo at different dosages, 2) with existing bronchodilators; (3) as add-on treatment to tiotropium.. We searched 13 electronic databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL, and contacted the manufacturer for unpublished data. Primary outcome was mean FEV1 change at 12(th) week, secondary outcomes included changes in SGRQ, TDI and BODE index at 6 months, exacerbation at 1 year, and worsening of symptoms.. Twelve eligible RCTs of moderate risk of bias included data from 10,977 patients. Compared to placebo, indacaterol improved FEV1 by a weighted mean difference (WMD) of 0.16 L (95%CI: 0.15, 0.18 L, p<0.001), homogeneously above the minimally important difference of 0.10 L. It offered clinically relevant improvement in all secondary outcomes except exacerbation. Magnitude of benefit did not differ significantly by dosage, but one treatment related death was reported at 300 ug. Efficacy of Indacaterol was similar to formoterol and salmeterol (FEV1 WMD = 0.04 L, 95%CI: 0.01 L, 0.07 L, p = 0.02); and tiotropium (FEV1 WMD = 0.01 L, 95%CI: -0.01, 0.03 L, p = 0.61). The use of indacaterol on top of tiotropium yielded additional improvement on FEV1 (WMD = 0.07 L, 95%CI: 0.05 L, 0.10 L, p<0.001).. Indacaterol is safe and beneficial for patients with COPD at dosage ≤150 ug. It may serve as a good alternative to existing bronchodilators, or as an add-on to tiotropium for unresponsive patients. Use of higher dosage requires further justification.

Topics: Bronchodilator Agents; Humans; Indans; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinolones; Scopolamine Derivatives; Tiotropium Bromide; Treatment Outcome

Clinicians are faced with an increasingly difficult choice regarding the optimal bronchodilator for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) given the number of new treatments. The objective of this study is to evaluate the comparative efficacy of indacaterol 75/150/300 μg once daily (OD), glycopyrronium bromide 50 μg OD, tiotropium bromide 18 μg/5 μg OD, salmeterol 50 μg twice daily (BID), formoterol 12 μg BID, and placebo for moderate to severe COPD.. Forty randomized controlled trials were combined in a Bayesian network meta-analysis. Outcomes of interest were trough and post-dose forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) score and responders (≥4 points), and Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI) score and responders (≥1 point) at 6 months.. Indacaterol was associated with a higher trough FEV1 than other active treatments (difference for indacaterol 150 μg and 300 μg versus placebo: 152 mL (95% credible interval (CrI): 126, 179); 160 mL (95% CrI: 133, 187)) and the greatest improvement in SGRQ score (difference for indacaterol 150 μg and 300 μg versus placebo: -3.9 (95% CrI -5.2, -2.6); -3.6 (95% CrI -4.8, -2.3)). Glycopyrronium and tiotropium 18 μg resulted in the next best estimates for both outcomes with minor differences (difference for glycopyrronium versus tiotropium for trough FEV1 and SGRQ: 18 mL (95% CrI: -16, 51); -0.55 (95% CrI: -2.04, 0.92).. In terms of trough FEV1 and SGRQ score indacaterol, glycopyrronium, and tiotropium are expected to be the most effective bronchodilators.

Topics: Albuterol; Bayes Theorem; Bronchodilator Agents; Delayed-Action Preparations; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Ethanolamines; Formoterol Fumarate; Glycopyrrolate; Humans; Indans; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinolones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Salmeterol Xinafoate; Scopolamine Derivatives; Severity of Illness Index; Tiotropium Bromide; Treatment Outcome

Indacaterol is a once-daily, long-acting β(2)-agonist bronchodilator that improves dyspnoea and health status in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD. While its bronchodilator effects have been shown to be maintained in different patient subgroups, effects on clinical outcomes in certain subgroups are not yet defined.. Post-hoc analysis of pooled clinical study data to investigate efficacy and safety of indacaterol compared with placebo and other long-acting bronchodilators (formoterol, salmeterol, open-label tiotropium) in patient subgroups defined by COPD severity (GOLD stage II or III; n = 4082) and ICS use at baseline (no/yes; n = 4088). Efficacy outcomes were trough (24-h post-dose) FEV(1), dyspnoea (transition dyspnoea index; TDI) and health status (St George's Respiratory Questionnaire; SGRQ) after 26 weeks.. All active treatments significantly improved trough FEV(1) and dyspnoea compared with placebo, and all apart from open-label tiotropium improved health status compared with placebo. Among active treatments, indacaterol 150 μg had the best overall efficacy profile in the GOLD II and no-ICS subgroups. In the GOLD III and ICS subgroups, indacaterol 300 μg had the best overall efficacy, including a marked effect on dyspnoea (1.4-point improvement in TDI total score vs. placebo; p < 0.001). Within subgroups, the incidence of adverse events was similar between treatments.. Indacaterol maintained its efficacy regardless of disease severity or use of concurrent ICS. Indacaterol 150 μg had the best overall efficacy profile in the GOLD stage II patients while, in patients with more severe disease, indacaterol 300 μg provided useful improvements in dyspnoea.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Adult; Aged; Albuterol; Bronchodilator Agents; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Dyspnea; Ethanolamines; Female; Forced Expiratory Volume; Formoterol Fumarate; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Indans; Male; Middle Aged; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinolones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Salmeterol Xinafoate; Scopolamine Derivatives; Severity of Illness Index; Tiotropium Bromide; Treatment Outcome; Vital Capacity

Bronchodilators are central to the symptomatic management of patients with COPD.Previous data have shown that inhaled indacaterol improved numerous clinical outcomes over placebo.. This systematic review explored the efficacy and safety of indacaterol in comparison with tiotropium or bid long-acting β 2 -agonists (TD-LABAs) for treatment of moderate to severe COPD. Randomized controlled trials were identified after a search of different databases of published and unpublished trials.. Five trials (5,920 participants) were included. Compared with tiotropium, indacaterol showed statistically and clinically significant reductions in the use of rescue medication and dyspnea(43% greater likelihood of achieving a minimal clinically important difference [MCID] in the transitional dyspnea index [TDI]; number needed to treat for benefit [NNTB] 5 10). Additionally,the MCID in health status was more likely to be achieved with indacaterol than with tiotropium (OR = 1.43; 95% CI, 1.22–1.68; P = .00001; [NNTB ]= 10). Trough FEV 1 was significantly higher at the end of treatment with indacaterol than with TD-LABAs (80 mL, P = .00001). Similarly, indacaterol signifi cantly improved dyspnea (61% greater likelihood of achieving an MCID in TDI, P = .008) and health status (21% greater likelihood of achieving an MCID in St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire, P 5 .04) than TD-LABA. Indacaterol showed similar levels of safety and tolerability to both comparators.. Available evidence suggests that indacaterol may prove useful as an alternative to tiotropium or TD-LABA due to its effects on health status, dyspnea, and pulmonary function.

Topics: Adrenergic beta-Agonists; Bronchodilator Agents; Evidence-Based Medicine; Humans; Indans; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinolones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Respiratory Function Tests; Scopolamine Derivatives; Tiotropium Bromide

Long-acting bronchodilators comprising long-acting beta(2)-agonists and the anticholinergic agent tiotropium are commonly used for managing persistent symptoms of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Combining these treatments, which have different mechanisms of action, may be more effective than the individual components. However, the benefits and risks of combining tiotropium and long-acting beta(2)-agonists for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary (COPD) disease are unclear.. To assess the relative effects of treatment with tiotropium in addition to long-acting beta(2)-agonist compared to tiotropium or long-acting beta(2)-agonist alone in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.. We searched the Cochrane Airways Group Specialised Register of trials and clinicaltrials.gov up to January 2012.. We included parallel group, randomised controlled trials of three months or longer comparing treatment with tiotropium in addition to long-acting beta(2)-agonist against tiotropium or long-acting beta(2)-agonist alone for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.. Two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion and then extracted data on trial quality and the outcome results. We contacted study authors for additional information. We collected information on adverse effects from the trials.. Five trials were included in this review, mostly recruiting participants with moderate or severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. All of them compared tiotropium in addition to long-acting beta(2)-agonist to tiotropium alone, but only one trial additionally compared a combination of the two types of bronchodilator with long-acting beta(2)-agonist (formoterol) alone. Two studies used the long-acting beta(2)-agonist indacaterol, two used formoterol and one used salmeterol.Compared to tiotropium alone (3263 patients), treatment with tiotropium plus long-acting beta(2)-agonist resulted in a slightly larger improvement in the mean health-related quality of life (St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) MD -1.61; 95% CI -2.93 to -0.29). In the control arm, tiotropium alone, the SGRQ improved by falling 4.5 units from baseline and with both treatments the improvement was a fall of 6.1 units from baseline (on average). High withdrawal rates in the trials increased the uncertainty in this result, and the GRADE assessment for this outcome was therefore moderate. There were no significant differences in the other primary outcomes (hospital admission or mortality).The secondary outcome of pre-bronchodilator FEV(1) showed a small mean increase with the addition of long-acting beta(2)-agonist (MD 0.07 L; 95% CI 0.05 to 0.09) over the control arm, which showed a change from baseline ranging from 0.03 L to 0.13 L on tiotropium alone. None of the other secondary outcomes (exacerbations, symptom scores, serious adverse events, and withdrawals) showed any statistically significant differences between the groups. There were wide confidence intervals around these outcomes and moderate heterogeneity for both exacerbations and withdrawals.The results from the one trial comparing the combination of tiotropium and long-acting beta(2)-agonist to long-acting beta(2)-agonist alone (417 participants) were insufficient to draw firm conclusions for this comparison.. The results from this review indicate a small mean improvement in health-related quality of life for patients on a combination of tiotropium and long-acting beta(2)-agonist compared to tiotropium alone, but it is not clear how clinically important this mean difference may be. Hospital admission and mortality have not been shown to be altered by adding long-acting beta(2)-agonists to tiotropium. There were not enough data to determine the relative efficacy and safety of tiotropium plus long-acting beta(2)-agonist compared to long-acting beta(2)-agonist alone. There were insufficient data to make comparisons between the different long-acting beta(2)-agonists when used in addition to tiotropium.

Topics: Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Aged; Albuterol; Bronchodilator Agents; Ethanolamines; Formoterol Fumarate; Humans; Indans; Middle Aged; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quality of Life; Quinolones; Salmeterol Xinafoate; Scopolamine Derivatives; Tiotropium Bromide

The objective of this study was to evaluate the comparative efficacy of indacaterol 75 μg once daily (OD), tiotropium 18 μg OD, salmeterol 50 μg twice daily (BID), formoterol 12 μg BID, and placebo for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) based on individual patient data (IPD) from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from the indacaterol trial program and aggregate data (AD) identified from a systematic review of RCTs.. 22 RCTs were included in the AD analysis that evaluated: indacaterol 75 μg (n = 2 studies), indacaterol 150 μg n = 5 (i.e. salmeterol 50 μg) (n = 5), indacaterol 300 μg (n = 2), tiotropium 18 μg (n = 10), salmeterol 50 μg (n = 7), and formoterol 12 μg (n = 4). All of the studies except for one head-to-head comparison (tiotropium vs. salmeterol) were placebo controlled. Outcomes of interest were trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score at week 12. The AD from all trials was analysed simultaneously using a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) and relative treatment effects between all regimens were obtained. In a separate analysis, the IPD available from the 6 indacaterol RCTs was analysed in a NMA. Treatment-by-covariate interactions were included in both analyses to improve similarity of the trials.. All interventions compared were more efficacious than placebo regarding FEV1 at 12 weeks. Indacaterol 75 μg is expected to result in a comparable FEV1 at 12 weeks to tiotropium and salmeterol based on both IPD and AD analyses. In comparison to formoterol, the IPD and AD results indicate indacaterol 75 μg is more efficacious (IPD = 0.07 L difference; 95%Credible Interval (CrI) 0.02 to 0.11; AD = 0.05 L difference; 95%CrI 0.01; 0.09). In terms of SGRQ total score at 12 weeks, indacaterol 75 μg and formoterol were more efficacious than placebo, whereas for tiotropium and salmeterol the credible intervals included zero for the AD results only (tiotropium: -2.99 points improvement versus placebo; 95%CrI -6.48 to 0.43; salmeterol:-2.52; 95%CrI: -5.34; 0.44). Both IPD and AD results suggest that indacaterol 75 μg is expected to be comparable to all active treatments.. Based on a synthesis of currently available AD RCT evidence as well as an IPD network meta-analysis of six RCTs, indacaterol 75 μg is expected to be at least as efficacious as formoterol and comparable to tiotropium and salmeterol regarding FEV1. Furthermore, indacaterol 75 μg shows comparable level of improvement in health-related quality of life to tiotropium, salmeterol, and formoterol, as measured by the SGRQ.

Topics: Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Antagonists; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Albuterol; Bronchodilator Agents; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Ethanolamines; Female; Formoterol Fumarate; Humans; Indans; Male; Middle Aged; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinolones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Salmeterol Xinafoate; Scopolamine Derivatives; Tiotropium Bromide; Treatment Outcome

Tiotropium and long-acting beta(2)-agonists (LABAs) are both accepted in the routine management for people with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). There are new studies which have compared tiotropium with LABAs, including some that have evaluated recently introduced LABAs.. To compare the relative clinical effects of tiotropium bromide alone versus LABA alone, upon measures of quality of life, exacerbations, lung function and serious adverse events, in people with stable COPD.To critically appraise and summarise current evidence on the costs and cost-effectiveness associated with tiotropium compared to LABA in people with COPD.. We identified randomised controlled trials (RCTs) from the Cochrane Airways Group Specialised Register of trials and economic evaluations from searching NHS EED and HEED (date of last search February 2012). We found additional trials from web-based clinical trial registers.. We included RCTs and full economic evaluations if they compared effects of tiotropium alone with LABAs alone in people with COPD. We allowed co-administration of standard COPD therapy.. Two review authors independently assessed studies for inclusion, then extracted data on study quality and outcomes. We contacted study authors and trial sponsors for additional information. We analysed data using the Cochrane Review Manager(RevMan 5.1) software.. Seven clinical studies totalling 12,223 participants with COPD were included in the review. The studies used similar designs and were generally of good methodological quality. Inclusion criteria for RCTs were similar across the included studies, although studies varied in terms of smoking history and COPD severity of participants. They compared tiotropium (which was delivered by HandiHaler in all studies) with salmeterol (four studies, 8936 participants), formoterol (one study, 431 participants) and indacaterol (two studies, 2856 participants). All participants were instructed to discontinue anticholinergic or long-acting beta(2)-agonist bronchodilators during treatment, but could receive inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) at a stable dose. Study duration ranged from 3 to 12 months. We extracted data for 11,223 participants. In general, the treatment groups were well matched at baseline. Overall, the risk of bias across the included RCTs was low.In the analysis of the primary outcomes in this review, a high level of heterogeneity amongst studies meant that we did not pool data for St George's Respiratory Questionnaire quality of life score. Subgroup analyses based on the type of LABA found statistically significant differences among effects on quality of life depending on whether tiotropium was compared with salmeterol, formoterol or indacaterol. Tiotropium reduced the number of participants experiencing one or more exacerbations compared with LABA (odds ratio (OR) 0.86; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.79 to 0.93). For this outcome, there was no difference seen among the different types of LABA. There was no statistical difference in mortality observed between the treatment groups.For secondary outcomes, tiotropium was associated with a reduction in the number of COPD exacerbations leading to hospitalisation compared with LABA treatment (OR 0.87; 95% 0.77 to 0.99), but not in the overall rate of all-cause hospitalisations. There was no statistically significant difference in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV(1)) or symptom score between tiotropium and LABA-treated participants. There was a lower rate of non-fatal serious adverse events recorded with tiotropium compared with LABA (OR 0.88; 95% CI 0.78 to 0.99). The tiotropium group was also associated with a lower rate of study withdrawals (OR 0.89; 95% CI 0.81 to 0.99).We identified six full economic evaluations assessing the cost and cost-effectiveness of tiotropium and salmeterol. The studies were b. In people with COPD, the evidence is equivocal as to whether or not tiotropium offers greater benefit than LABAs in improving quality of life; however, this is complicated by differences in effect among the LABA types. Tiotropium was more effective than LABAs as a group in preventing COPD exacerbations and disease-related hospitalisations, although there were no statistical differences between groups in overall hospitalisation rates or mortality during the study periods. There were fewer serious adverse events and study withdrawals recorded with tiotropium compared with LABAs. Symptom improvement and changes in lung function were similar between the treatment groups. Given the small number of studies to date, with high levels of heterogeneity among them, one approach may be to give a COPD patient a substantial trial of tiotropium, followed by a LABA (or vice versa), then to continue prescribing the long-acting bronchodilator that the patient prefers. Further studies are needed to compare tiotropium with different LABAs, which are currently ongoing. The available economic evidence indicates that tiotropium may be cost-effective compared with salmeterol in several specific settings, but there is considerable uncertainty around this finding.

Topics: Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Albuterol; Bronchodilator Agents; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Disease Progression; Ethanolamines; Formoterol Fumarate; Hospitalization; Humans; Indans; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quality of Life; Quinolones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Salmeterol Xinafoate; Scopolamine Derivatives; Tiotropium Bromide

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality across the globe and within the United States. Although several medication classes are used for COPD treatment, none of these medications have been shown to significantly improve long-term lung function or mitigate overall disease progression. This review describes the pharmacologic treatment options for COPD and highlights recent studies evaluating the impact of bronchodilators and combination therapy on lung function, mortality, quality of life, and exacerbations. Additionally, indacaterol and roflumilast, 2 new COPD treatment agents approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2011, are discussed. Pharmacists play an important role in managing and educating patients with COPD and should utilize new evidence to make recommendations.

Topics: Aminopyridines; Benzamides; Bronchodilator Agents; Cyclopropanes; Humans; Indans; Phosphodiesterase 4 Inhibitors; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quality of Life; Quinolones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Scopolamine Derivatives; Tiotropium Bromide

Several studies in COPD have shown a significant and early increase in the risk of cardiovascular mortality attributable to inhaled bronchodilators including long acting β2 agonists (LABAs) and muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs). Cardiac autonomic system impairment may be a potential mechanism involved.. We performed a phase 4, investigator-initiated, prospective, randomized, blinded, cross-over trial (LAB-Card trial - NCT02872090) to evaluate the effect of two LAMAs and one LABA on the cardiac autonomic system in patients with COPD by using three major assessment approaches: heart rate variability (HRV, a predictor of cardiovascular death), baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) and autonomic function (tilt test).. 34 patients attended four visits to receive either tiotropium 18µg, glycopyrronium 44µg, indacaterol 150 µg or placebo (lactose) in a randomized order followed by the assessment of HRV and BRS in supine position and after passive rising. Neither LAMAs (tiotropium or glycopyrronium) nor LABA (indacaterol) induced a higher LF/HF ratio (reflect of sympathetic/parasympathetic balance) measured in supine position at rest compared to placebo (primary outcome). Solely indacaterol induced an increase in heart rate compared to placebo. No significant differences were observed for HRV and BRS between active drugs and placebo in supine position or after passive rising.. We did not found evidence of a deleterious effect of 2 LAMAs and one LABA on the autonomic cardiovascular control in COPD patients. Further investigations are needed to explore mechanisms by which long-acting bronchodilators may increase cardiovascular events in COPD.

Topics: Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Bronchodilator Agents; Glycopyrrolate; Humans; Prospective Studies; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Tiotropium Bromide

The efficacy of long-acting bronchodilators for COPD associated with biomass (BE-COPD) has not been properly evaluated.. To determine the acute effect of indacaterol (IND) 150 μg q.d and tiotropium (TIO) 18 μg q.d. on lung hyperinflation, walking distance (WD) and dyspnea during the six-minute walking test (6MWT) in moderate BE-COPD at 30, 60 and 240 mins post-drug administration.. Randomized, controlled, open-level, crossover noninferiority clinical trial. Forty-two women with BE-COPD were randomly assigned to a bronchodilator sequence: IND-TIO or vice versa.. There were statistically significant changes over time in inspiratory capacity (IC) (. Both IND and TIO showed significant and fast onset improvement in hyperinflation. Therefore, either of them may be recommended as a first line of treatment for COPD associated with BE-COPD.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Biomass; Bronchodilator Agents; Cross-Over Studies; Environmental Exposure; Exercise Test; Female; Forced Expiratory Volume; Humans; Indans; Inspiratory Capacity; Middle Aged; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinolones; Smoke; Spirometry; Tiotropium Bromide; Treatment Outcome; Vital Capacity

There are no studies on withdrawal of inhaled corticosteroids in patients on long-term triple therapy in the absence of frequent exacerbations.. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of direct de-escalation from long-term triple therapy to indacaterol/glycopyrronium in nonfrequently exacerbating patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).. This 26-week, randomized, double-blind, triple-dummy study assessed the direct change from long-term triple therapy to indacaterol/glycopyrronium (110/50 μg once daily) or continuation of triple therapy (tiotropium [18 μg] once daily plus combination of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate [50/500 μg] twice daily) in nonfrequently exacerbating patients with moderate-to-severe COPD. Primary endpoint was noninferiority on change from baseline in trough FEV. In patients with COPD without frequent exacerbations on long-term triple therapy, the direct de-escalation to indacaterol/glycopyrronium led to a small decrease in lung function, with no difference in exacerbations. The higher exacerbation risk in patients with ≥300 blood eosinophils/μl suggests that these patients are likely to benefit from triple therapy. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 02603393).

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Aged; Bronchodilator Agents; Double-Blind Method; Female; Fluticasone-Salmeterol Drug Combination; Glucocorticoids; Glycopyrrolate; Humans; Indans; Male; Muscarinic Antagonists; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinolones; Tiotropium Bromide; Treatment Outcome

The difference in efficacy of long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) and long-acting β. Thirty stable patients were enrolled and randomly divided into two groups following baseline measurements. One group was treated with 5 μg tiotropium (Respimat inhaler) for 4 weeks following a 4-week treatment with 150 μg indacaterol, while the other group was treated with indacaterol for 4 weeks following a 4-week treatment with tiotropium. For both groups, these treatments were followed by a combination of the two drugs for 4 weeks. Pulmonary function tests, including DLH evaluated by metronome-paced incremental hyperventilation and exercise tolerance evaluated by the shuttle-walk test, were performed at the end of each treatment period.. In total, 23 patients completed this study. Both tiotropium and indacaterol alone significantly increased forced expiratory volume in 1 second, exercise tolerance, and improved health status. Tiotropium significantly improved DLH, but indacaterol did not. The combination therapy resulted in further improvements in lung function and exercise tolerance, but not in DLH.. The efficacy of tiotropium in inhibiting DLH following metronome-paced incremental hyperventilation may be superior to that of 150 μg indacaterol, although the effects on airflow obstruction were the same, and the combination therapy showed further improvement in airflow obstruction, but not in DLH.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Aged; Bronchodilator Agents; Cross-Over Studies; Drug Therapy, Combination; Exercise Tolerance; Female; Forced Expiratory Volume; Humans; Indans; Japan; Lung; Male; Muscarinic Antagonists; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinolones; Recovery of Function; Time Factors; Tiotropium Bromide; Treatment Outcome

There is currently no measure to predict a treatability of long-acting β-2 agonist (LABA) or long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We aimed to build prediction models for the treatment response to these bronchodilators, in order to determine the most responsive medication for patients with COPD.. We performed a prospective open-label crossover study, in which each long-acting bronchodilator was given in a random order to 65 patients with stable COPD for 4 weeks, with a 4-week washout period in between. We analyzed 14 baseline clinical traits, expression profiles of 31,426 gene transcripts, and damaged-gene scores of 6,464 genes acquired from leukocytes. The gene expression profiles were measured by RNA microarray and the damaged-gene scores were obtained after DNA exome sequencing. Linear regression analyses were performed to build prediction models after using factor and correlation analyses.. Using a prediction model for a LABA, traits found associated with the treatment response were post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second, bronchodilator reversibility (BDR) to salbutamol, expression of three genes (. Adding the expressions of genes and damaged-gene scores to the clinical traits may improve the predictability of treatment response to long-acting bronchodilators.

Topics: Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Aged; Bronchodilator Agents; Clinical Decision-Making; Cross-Over Studies; Female; Forced Expiratory Volume; Gene Expression Profiling; Humans; Indans; Lung; Male; Middle Aged; Models, Genetic; Muscarinic Antagonists; Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis; Patient Selection; Precision Medicine; Predictive Value of Tests; Prospective Studies; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quantitative Trait, Heritable; Quinolones; Republic of Korea; Time Factors; Tiotropium Bromide; Transcriptome; Treatment Outcome

The fixed-dose, long-acting bronchodilator combination of umeclidinium/vilanterol (UMEC/VI) has not previously been compared with a combination of a long-acting muscarinic antagonist and long-acting β2-agonist in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).. This 12-week, randomized, blinded, triple-dummy, parallel-group, non-inferiority study compared once-daily UMEC/VI 62.5/25 mcg with once-daily tiotropium (TIO) 18 mcg + indacaterol (IND) 150 mcg in patients with moderate-to-very-severe COPD. The primary endpoint was the trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) on day 85 (predefined non-inferiority margin -50 mL), and the secondary endpoint was the 0- to 6-h weighted mean (WM) FEV1 on day 84. Other efficacy endpoints [including rescue medication use, the Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI) focal score, and the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) score] and safety endpoints [adverse events (AEs), vital signs, and COPD exacerbations] were also assessed.. Trough FEV1 improvements were comparable between treatment groups [least squares (LS) mean changes from baseline to day 85: UMEC/VI 172 mL; TIO + IND 171 mL; treatment difference 1 mL; 95 % confidence interval (CI) -29 to 30 mL], demonstrating non-inferiority between UMEC/VI and TIO + IND. The treatments produced similar improvements in the trough FEV1 at other study visits and the 0- to 6-h WM FEV1 (LS mean changes at day 84: UMEC/VI 235 mL; TIO + IND 258 mL; treatment difference -23 mL; 95 % CI -54 to 8 mL). The results for patient-reported measures (rescue medication use, TDI focal score, and SGRQ score) were comparable; both treatments produced clinically meaningful improvements in TDI and SGRQ scores. The incidence of AEs and COPD exacerbations, and changes in vital signs were similar for the two treatments.. UMEC/VI and TIO + IND, given once daily, provided similar improvements in lung function and patient-reported outcomes over 12 weeks in patients with COPD, with comparable tolerability and safety profiles.. ClinicalTrials.gov study ID NCT02257385; GSK study no. 116961.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Benzyl Alcohols; Bronchodilator Agents; Chlorobenzenes; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Female; Forced Expiratory Volume; Humans; Indans; Male; Middle Aged; Muscarinic Antagonists; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinolones; Quinuclidines; Tiotropium Bromide; Treatment Outcome

Current guidelines recommend combining long-acting bronchodilators with different modes of action in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We evaluated the effects of airway dimensions and pulmonary function with tiotropium plus indacaterol versus Advair(®).. Subjects (n = 46) were randomized to receive tiotropium (18 μg once daily) plus indacaterol (150 μg once daily) or Advair(®) (50/250 μg twice daily) for 16 weeks. Airway geometry was determined by quantitative computed tomography (luminal area, Ai; total area of the airway, Ao; wall area, WA; and percentage wall area, WA/Ao and wall thickness, T). Spirometry (forced expiratory volume in 1 s, FEV1; forced vital capacity, FVC and inspiratory capacity, IC) and St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) were evaluated.. Tiotropium plus indacaterol significantly increased CT-indices including Ai corrected for body surface area (Ai/BSA), and decreased WA/BSA, WA/Ao and T/√BSA compared with Advair(®) (p < 0.05, respectively). In physiological parameters, mean difference in IC was significantly higher under treatment with tiotropium plus indacaterol than Advair(®) (p < 0.05). The changes in Ai/BSA, WA/BSA, WA/Ao and T/√BSA were significantly correlated with changes in IC (r = 0.535, p = 0.011; r = -0.688, p < 0.001; r = -0.555, p = 0.002 and r = -0.542, p = 0.007; respectively). There were more significant improvements in SGRQ scores after treatment with tiotropium plus indacaterol than Advair(®).. These findings suggest that dual bronchodilation with tiotropium plus indacaterol is superior in airway geometry and lung function compared with Advair(®) in COPD.

Topics: Aged; Albuterol; Androstadienes; Bronchodilator Agents; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluticasone-Salmeterol Drug Combination; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Indans; Male; Middle Aged; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinolones; Scopolamine Derivatives; Spirometry; Surveys and Questionnaires; Tiotropium Bromide

Combination therapy with a long-acting antimuscarinic agent and a long-acting β2-agonist are recommended in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) if control is not adequate with one long-acting bronchodilator alone. We evaluated the effects of indacaterol and tiotropium combination therapy, including the effects of adding indacaterol to tiotropium (indacaterol add-on group) and adding tiotropium to indacaterol (tiotropium add-on group).. We recruited 79 patients with COPD already treated with tiotropium or indacaterol. We undertook pulmonary function tests, the COPD assessment test (CAT), and the multi-frequency forced oscillation technique (to measure respiratory resistance and reactance) before and after 8 weeks of indacaterol and tiotropium combination therapy.. The median age was 72.1 years and the mean forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) as a proportion of predicted was 57.2 ± 18.3%. After 8 weeks of combination therapy, FEV1 and %predicted FEV1 had increased significantly. There was no change in CAT score. For respiratory impedance, combination therapy improved resistance at 5 Hz (R5) and resistance at 20 Hz (R20) in the whole-breath, inspiratory and expiratory phases, and resonant frequency (Fres) in the inspiratory phase. The indacaterol add-on group (43 patients) and tiotropium add-on group (36 patients) showed improvements in FEV1 and %predicted FEV1 over monotherapy, although the CAT score fell significantly in the indacaterol add-on group (p = 0.005).. Indacaterol and tiotropium combination therapy improved airflow limitation and respiratory resistances. Adding indacaterol to tiotropium, or tiotropium to indacaterol, had similar effects on airflow limitation.

Topics: Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Bronchodilator Agents; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Forced Expiratory Volume; Humans; Indans; Male; Middle Aged; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinolones; Respiratory Function Tests; Scopolamine Derivatives; Tiotropium Bromide; Treatment Outcome

According to current GOLD strategy, patients with COPD classified as groups A and B may be treated with inhaled bronchodilators, either long-acting β2-agonist (LABA) or long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA). However, there is little guidance on which class of agent is preferred and a lack of prospective data to differentiate the two.. In this study, we performed post-hoc analyses of pooled data from two prospective, controlled clinical trials comparing the LABA indacaterol and LAMA tiotropium in 1422 patients with moderate airflow limitation and no history of exacerbations in the previous year. This population fits the definitions of GOLD A and B groups and could be further stratified by symptom severity using Baseline Dyspnea Index (i.e. modeling GOLD A or B) and inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) use at baseline. Outcomes measured after 12 weeks of treatment were lung function (forced expiratory volume in 1 s; FEV1), health status (St George's Respiratory Questionnaire; SGRQ), symptoms (Transition Dyspnea Index; TDI) and rescue medication use.. In 'GOLD A' patients not receiving ICS, differences favored indacaterol versus tiotropium (trough FEV1 0.05 L; rescue medication use -0.41 puffs/day; TDI total score 0.94 points; SGRQ total score -3.13 units, all p < 0.01). In 'GOLD B, no ICS' patients, compared with tiotropium, indacaterol treatment increased trough FEV1 (0.055 L, p < 0.05) and permitted a larger reduction in rescue medication use (-0.81 puffs/day, p = 0.004). In all patients, and in patients not using ICS, differences favored indacaterol for all variables.. Our findings suggest that patients in GOLD groups A and B may experience greater benefits with indacaterol than with tiotropium.

Topics: Bronchodilator Agents; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Forced Expiratory Flow Rates; Humans; Indans; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinolones; Tiotropium Bromide; Treatment Outcome

The forced oscillation technique (FOT) can measure respiratory mechanics and has attracted attention in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We aimed to evaluate the effects of only indacaterol and tiotropium monotherapies on airflow limitation and respiratory impedance. Pulmonary function tests, COPD assessment test (CAT), and multifrequency FOT with MostGraph-01 were performed at the beginning and after 8 weeks of treatment with indacaterol or tiotropium. The resistance index, resistance at 5 Hz (R5), resistance at 20 Hz (R20), reactance index, reactance at 5 Hz (X5), resonant frequency (Fres), and low-frequency reactance area (ALX) were determined at whole-breath, inspiratory, and expiratory phases. Eighty-two patients (mean age: 73 years; mean forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1): 61.6%±19.0% predicted) were randomized to indacaterol or tiotropium treatment. Both bronchodilators improved airflow limitation, with mean trough improvements in FEV1 of 165 mL and 80 mL in the indacaterol and tiotropium groups, respectively. The CAT score decreased in the indacaterol group (P<0.001; 11.2±6.6 to 7.5±5.6). Compared with tiotropium, indacaterol significantly improved FEV1, percent predicted FEV1, and CAT score (P=0.042, P=0.008, and P=0.027, respectively). For respiratory impedance, indacaterol and tiotropium changed R5, X5, Fres, and ALX at whole-breath, inspiratory, and expiratory phases. In the indacaterol group, the changes in R5, R5-R20, X5, Fres, and ALX were significantly correlated with the changes in FEV1. The use of the FOT may enable the evaluation of the effects of bronchodilators in addition to FEV1-indicated therapeutic effects in COPD.

Topics: Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Airway Resistance; Bronchodilator Agents; Female; Forced Expiratory Volume; Humans; Indans; Japan; Lung; Male; Middle Aged; Muscarinic Antagonists; Oscillometry; Predictive Value of Tests; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinolones; Respiratory Function Tests; Respiratory Mechanics; Time Factors; Tiotropium Bromide; Treatment Outcome; Vital Capacity

Combining a long-acting muscarinic antagonist with a long-acting β₂-agonist has been shown to be pharmacologically useful in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the dual bronchodilator therapy on airway dimensions in COPD.. Patients (n = 54) were randomly assigned to receive tiotropium (18 μg once daily), indacaterol (150 μg once daily) or tiotropium plus indacaterol for 16 weeks. Quantitative computed tomography (CT), pulmonary function and health status (St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire) were measured.. Compared with tiotropium or indacaterol alone, combination therapy resulted in a significant decrease in percentage wall area (WA%) and wall thickness, corrected for body surface area, and an increase in luminal area (Ai/BSA). Concurrent treatment was superior to monotherapy in physiological indices, including forced vital capacity, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV₁) and inspiratory capacity. The changes in WA% and Ai/BSA were significantly correlated with changes in FEV₁ (r = -0.44, P < 0.01 and r = 0.37, P < 0.01). There were more significant improvements in SGRQ scores after treatment with combined therapy than with either treatment alone.. Concurrent therapy with tiotropium and indacaterol is effective for COPD patients to promote reduction in airway wall thickness, bronchodilation, and improvements in lung function compared with a single inhaler.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Aged; Bronchodilator Agents; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Health Status; Humans; Indans; Lung; Male; Middle Aged; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quality of Life; Quinolones; Respiratory Function Tests; Scopolamine Derivatives; Severity of Illness Index; Tiotropium Bromide; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Treatment Outcome

To further assess the safety profile of the fixed-dose combination of indacaterol and glycopyrronium (QVA149) and its monocomponents; we investigated the impact of individual patient-level factors and time by integrating the patient-level safety data from the QVA149 clinical programme with relevant information from the independent indacaterol and glycopyrronium safety databases.. Data from 11,404 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) were pooled from 14 clinical studies of QVA149, indacaterol and glycopyrronium of ≥3 month's duration with at least two of the treatment groups: QVA149 110/50 μg, glycopyrronium 50 μg, indacaterol 150 μg, placebo or tiotropium 18 μg. Overall hazard ratio (HR) was assessed between the active treatments and placebo and in various subgroups related to severity of airways obstruction, inhaled corticosteroid use, cardiovascular risk factors, sex, age and body mass index for death, serious cases of cardio- and cerebrovascular (CCV) events, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), pneumonia, COPD exacerbations requiring hospitalisation or atrial flutter/fibrillation (AF/F).. The HR for QVA149 versus placebo showed no significant increase in the overall risk for death (HR [95% confidence interval]: 0.93 [0.34-2.54]); CCV events (0.60 [0.29-1.24]); MACE (1.04 [0.45-2.42]); pneumonia (1.10 [0.54-2.25]); COPD exacerbations (0.60 [0.40-0.91]); and AF/F (1.03 [0.49-2.18]). Similar results were observed for indacaterol, glycopyrronium and tiotropium versus placebo for overall risk and in analysed subgroups.. There was no increase in the risk for the investigated safety endpoints for the fixed-dose combination QVA149, and it had a comparable safety profile as its monocomponents and tiotropium versus placebo.

Topics: Aged; Bronchodilator Agents; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycopyrrolate; Humans; Indans; Male; Middle Aged; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinolones; Risk Factors; Scopolamine Derivatives; Tiotropium Bromide; Treatment Outcome

Indacaterol is a long-acting beta-2 agonist for once-daily treatment of COPD. We evaluated the effects of indacaterol 150 μg on lung hyperinflation compared with placebo and open-label tiotropium 18 μg. We measured physical activity during treatment with indacaterol 150 μg and matched placebo.. We performed a randomized, three-period, cross-over study (21 days of treatment separated by two wash-out periods of 13 days) with indacaterol 150 μg or matching placebo and tiotropium 18 μg. Lung function was assessed by body plethysmography and spirometry. Physical activity was measured for one week by a multisensory armband at the end of both treatment periods with indacaterol/matched placebo. The primary endpoint was peak inspiratory capacity at the end of each treatment period.. 129 patients (mean age, 61 years; mean post-bronchodilator FEV1, 64%), were randomized and 110 patients completed the study. Peak inspiratory capacity was 0.22 L greater with Indacaterol at day 21 compared to placebo (p < 0.001). Similar results were observed for tiotropium. Both bronchodilators also significantly improved other parameters of lung hyperinflation compared with placebo. All parameters of physical activity were significantly increased during treatment with indacaterol versus placebo.. Indacaterol 150 μg improved lung hyperinflation in patients with moderate COPD, which was associated with an increase of physical activity.. ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT01012765.

Topics: Actigraphy; Aged; Bronchodilator Agents; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Female; Forced Expiratory Volume; Humans; Indans; Inspiratory Capacity; Male; Middle Aged; Motor Activity; Plethysmography, Impedance; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinolones; Scopolamine Derivatives; Spirometry; Tiotropium Bromide

We investigated the efficacy and safety of dual bronchodilation with QVA149 versus its monocomponents indacaterol and glycopyrronium, tiotropium and placebo in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This was a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled, 26-week trial. Patients (n = 2144) were randomised (2:2:2:2:1) to receive once-daily QVA149 (indacaterol 110 μg/glycopyrronium 50 μg), indacaterol 150 μg, glycopyrronium 50 μg, open-label tiotropium 18 μg or placebo. The primary end-point was trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) at week 26 for QVA149 versus its monocomponents. Secondary end-points included dyspnoea, health status, rescue medication use and safety. Trough FEV1 at week 26 was significantly improved (p<0.001) with QVA149 compared with indacaterol and glycopyrronium (least squares mean (LSM) differences 0.07 L and 0.09 L, respectively), tiotropium and placebo (LSM differences 0.08 L and 0.20 L, respectively); these beneficial effects were sustained throughout the 26-week study. QVA149 significantly improved dyspnoea and health status versus placebo (p<0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively) and tiotropium (p = 0.007 and p = 0.009, respectively) at week 26. All treatments were well tolerated. Dual bronchodilation with once-daily QVA149 demonstrated superior and clinically meaningful outcomes versus placebo and superiority versus treatment with a single bronchodilator, with a safety and tolerability profile similar to placebo, supporting the concept of fixed-dose long-acting muscarinic antagonist/long-acting β2-agonist combinations for the treatment of COPD.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adult; Aged; Bronchodilator Agents; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Female; Forced Expiratory Volume; Glycopyrrolate; Humans; Indans; Male; Middle Aged; Quinolones; Scopolamine Derivatives; Spirometry; Tiotropium Bromide; Treatment Outcome

We compared the efficacy and safety of indacaterol and tiotropium in patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and a history of at least one moderate to severe exacerbation in the previous 12 months.. In this multicentre, randomised, blinded, double-dummy, parallel group study, we enrolled patients aged 40 years or older with severe COPD and at least one exacerbation within the previous year. We used a computer-generated sequence to randomly allocate patients (1:1; stratified by baseline inhaled corticosteroid use, with the balance of treatments maintained at country level) to receive either indacaterol (150 μg) or tiotropium (18 μg) once-daily for 52 weeks. Our primary and key secondary objectives were to investigate whether indacaterol was non-inferior to tiotropium for trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) at week 12 (primary endpoint), and for rate of exacerbations at week 52 (secondary endpoint). Analysis populations for the primary and key secondary endpoints were per-protocol sets. The safety set included all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00845728.. Between March 16, 2009, and July 5, 2012, we enrolled and randomly allocated 3444 patients: 1723 to indacaterol and 1721 to tiotropium. At week 12, the estimated least squares mean trough FEV1 difference between the groups was -0.011 L (least squares mean with indacaterol [n=1450] 1.134 L [SE 0.008] vs tiotropium [n=1467] 1.145 L [0.008]; one-sided 97.5% CI lower limit -0.026 L; p<0.0001). The lower limit of the 97.5% CI was above the prespecified non-inferiority margin of -0.055 L, suggesting that indacaterol was non-inferior to tiotropium. Indacaterol did not show non-inferiority in terms of annualised exacerbation rates: 0.79 (indacaterol, n=1529) versus 0.61 (tiotropium, n=1543); ratio 1.29 (one-sided 97.5% CI upper limit 1.44). In the safety set, we recorded no between-group difference in the number of patients who had adverse events (indacaterol 1119 [65%] of 1721 patients vs tiotropium 1065 [62%] of 1718 patients) or serious adverse events (indacaterol, 263 [15%] of 1721 patients vs tiotropium, 255 [15%] of 1718 patients). Respiratory disorders, particularly worsening of COPD, were the most common adverse events (COPD: indacaterol, 747 [43%] of 1721 patients and tiotropium, 665 [39%] of 1718 patients) and serious adverse events (COPD: indacaterol, 147 [9%] of 1721 patients and tiotropium, 121 [7%] of 1718 patients).. Indacaterol and tiotropium provided clinically relevant improvements in lung function with comparable safety profiles. Tiotropium afforded greater protection from exacerbations, although the absolute number of events was small and the difference between treatments is of uncertain clinical importance. The present data offer evidence consistent with current guidelines.. Novartis Pharma AG.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Bronchodilator Agents; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Forced Expiratory Volume; Humans; Indans; Male; Middle Aged; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinolones; Scopolamine Derivatives; Tiotropium Bromide; Treatment Outcome; Vital Capacity

Evidence has been provided that high-dose indacaterol (300 μg) can reduce lung hyperinflation in moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).. To study whether low-dose indacaterol (150 μg) also reduces lung hyperinflation in comparison with the recommended dose of tiotropium (18 μg) in moderate COPD.. This was a multicenter, randomized, blinded, 3-period cross-over, placebo-controlled study. Spirometry and lung volumes were measured before and 30, 60, 120, 180 and 240 min after the administration of single-doses of indacaterol, tiotropium, or placebo. The primary end-point was the change in peak inspiratory capacity (IC). The area under the 4-h curve (AUC(0-4)) for IC, 1-s forced expiratory volume (FEV(1)) and forced vital capacity (FVC) were secondary variables.. 49 patients completed the study. On average, peak IC and AUC(0-4) for IC were significantly greater after indacaterol than placebo by 177 mL (p = 0.007) and 142 mL (p = 0.001), respectively. Differences in peak IC and AUC(0-4) for IC between tiotropium and placebo were 120 mL (p = 0.07) and 85 mL (p = 0.052), respectively. Differences between indacaterol and tiotropium were statistically insignificant. Peak IC increased by >20% in 12 patients with indacaterol and 9 with tiotropium (p = 0.001), and by >30% in 8 patients with indacaterol and 3 with tiotropium (p = 0.001). The effects of indacaterol and tiotropium on FEV(1) and FVC were statistically significant vs placebo.. Low-dose indacaterol has a bronchodilator effect that is similar to the recommended dose of tiotropium, but it is slightly superior in reducing lung hyperinflation.. ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT00999908.

Topics: Aged; Area Under Curve; Bronchodilator Agents; Cross-Over Studies; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Forced Expiratory Volume; Humans; Indans; Inspiratory Capacity; Lung Volume Measurements; Male; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinolones; Scopolamine Derivatives; Severity of Illness Index; Spirometry; Time Factors; Tiotropium Bromide; Vital Capacity

Current guidelines recommend treatment with one or more long-acting bronchodilators for patients with moderate or more severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The authors investigated the approach of dual bronchodilation using indacaterol, a once-daily long-acting β(2) agonist, and the long-acting muscarinic antagonist tiotropium, compared with tiotropium alone.. In two identically designed, double-blind, 12-week studies, patients with moderate to severe COPD were randomised to indacaterol 150 μg once daily or matching placebo. All patients concurrently received open-label tiotropium 18 μg once daily. The primary outcome was standardised area under the curve of forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) from 5 min to 8 h post dose at week 12. The key secondary outcome was 24 h post-dose ('trough') FEV(1) at week 12. Resting inspiratory capacity (IC) was measured in a subgroup.. 1134 and 1142 patients were randomised in studies 1 and 2; 94% and 94% completed. Compared with monotherapy, concurrent therapy increased FEV(1) (area under the curve by 130 and 120 ml, trough by 80 and 70 ml; all p<0.001) and trough IC (by 130 and 100 ml, p<0.01). Cough was more common with indacaterol plus tiotropium (10% and 9%) than with tiotropium alone (4% and 4%). Most cases (∼90%) of cough were mild. Other adverse events were similar for the treatment groups.. Compared with tiotropium monotherapy, indacaterol plus tiotropium provided greater bronchodilation and lung deflation (reflected by increased resting IC). Adverse events were similar between treatments apart from mild cough being more common with indacaterol plus tiotropium. These results support COPD guideline recommendations to combine bronchodilators with different mechanisms of action.. NCT00846586 and NCT00877383.

Topics: Adrenergic beta-Agonists; Adult; Analysis of Variance; Area Under Curve; Bronchodilator Agents; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Indans; Least-Squares Analysis; Male; Middle Aged; Placebos; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinolones; Respiratory Function Tests; Scopolamine Derivatives; Severity of Illness Index; Tiotropium Bromide; Treatment Outcome

Two, once daily (q.d.) inhaled bronchodilators are available for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): the β(2)-agonist indacaterol and the anticholinergic tiotropium. This blinded study compared the efficacy of these two agents and assessed their safety and tolerability. Patients with moderate-to-severe COPD were randomised to treatment with indacaterol 150 μg q.d. (n=797) or tiotropium 18 μg q.d. (n=801) for 12 weeks. After 12 weeks, the two treatments had similar overall effects on "trough" (24 h post-dose) forced expiratory volume in 1 s. Indacaterol-treated patients had greater improvements in transition dyspnoea index (TDI) total score (least squares means 2.01 versus 1.43; p<0.001) and St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score (least squares means 37.1 versus 39.2; p<0.001; raw mean change from baseline -5.1 versus -3.0), and were significantly more likely to achieve clinically relevant improvements in these end-points (indacaterol versus tiotropium odds ratios of 1.49 for TDI and 1.43 for SGRQ, both p<0.001). Adverse events were recorded for 39.7% and 37.2% of patients in the indacaterol and tiotropium treatment groups, respectively. The most frequent adverse events were COPD worsening, cough and nasopharyngitis. Both bronchodilators demonstrated spirometric efficacy. The two treatments were well tolerated with similar adverse event profiles. Compared with tiotropium, indacaterol provided significantly greater improvements in clinical outcomes.

Topics: Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Antagonists; Aged; Bronchodilator Agents; Cholinergic Antagonists; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Forced Expiratory Volume; Humans; Indans; Male; Medical Records; Middle Aged; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinolones; Scopolamine Derivatives; Severity of Illness Index; Spirometry; Tiotropium Bromide; Treatment Outcome

For optimal efficacy, an inhaler should deliver doses consistently and be easy for patients to use with minimal instruction. The delivery characteristics, patients' correct use, and preference of two single-dose dry powder inhalers (Breezhaler and HandiHaler) were evaluated in two complementary studies. The first study examined aerodynamic particle size distribution, using inhalation profiles of seven patients with moderate to very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The second was an open-label, two-period, 7-day crossover study, evaluating use of the inhalers with placebo capsules by 82 patients with mild to severe COPD. Patients' correct use of the inhalers was assessed after reading written instructions on Day 1, and after training and 7 days of daily use. Patients' preference was assessed after completion of both study periods. Patient inhalation profiles showed average peak inspiratory flows of 72 L/minute through Breezhaler and 36 L/minute through HandiHaler. For Breezhaler and HandiHaler, fine particle fractions were 27% and 10%, respectively. In the second study, correct use of Breezhaler and HandiHaler was achieved by > 77% of patients for any step after 7 days; 61% of patients showed an overall preference for Breezhaler and 31% for HandiHaler (P = 0.01).Breezhaler is a low-resistance inhaler suitable for use by patients with a range of disease severities. Most patients used both inhalers correctly after 7 days, but more patients showed an overall preference for the Breezhaler compared with the HandiHaler. These are important factors for optimum dose delivery and successful COPD management.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Adult; Aerosols; Aged; Bronchodilator Agents; Canada; Cholinergic Antagonists; Cross-Over Studies; Dry Powder Inhalers; Equipment Design; Female; Humans; Indans; Inhalation; Lung; Male; Middle Aged; Particle Size; Patient Education as Topic; Patient Preference; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinolones; Scopolamine Derivatives; Severity of Illness Index; Surveys and Questionnaires; Time Factors; Tiotropium Bromide; Treatment Outcome; United States

To explore the utility of applying growth mixture models (GMMs) in secondary analyses of clinical trials to identify sources of variability in data reported by patients with COPD.. Analyses were performed on data from two 6-month clinical trials comparing indacaterol and open-label tiotropium or blinded salmeterol and the first six months of a 12-month trial comparing indacaterol and blinded formoterol. Latent growth model (LGM) analyses were conducted to explore the response of the SGRQ Symptoms score from baseline to six months and GMM analyses were evaluated as a method to identify latent classes of differential responders.. Variability in SGRQ Symptom scores was found suggesting subsets of patients with differential response to treatment. GMM analyses found subsets of non-responders in all trials. When the responders were analyzed separately from non-responders, there were increased treatment effects (e.g., symptoms score improvement over six months for whole groups: indacaterol=8-12 units, tiotropium=7 units, salmeterol=9 units, formoterol=11 units. Responder subgroup improvement: indacaterol=9-21 units, tiotropium=7 units, salmeterol=10 units, formoterol=20 units). Responders had significantly different baseline SGRQ Symptom scores, smoking history, age, and mMRC dyspnea scores than non-responders.. Patients with COPD represent a heterogeneous population in terms of their reporting of symptoms and response to treatment. GMM analyses are able to identify sub-groups of responders and non-responders. Application of this methodology could be of value on other endpoints in COPD and in other disease areas.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Albuterol; Bronchodilator Agents; Delayed-Action Preparations; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Ethanolamines; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Forced Expiratory Volume; Formoterol Fumarate; Humans; Indans; Male; Middle Aged; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinolones; Salmeterol Xinafoate; Scopolamine Derivatives; Surveys and Questionnaires; Time Factors; Tiotropium Bromide; Treatment Outcome

The drug development process can be streamlined by combining the traditionally separate stages of dose-finding (Phase IIb) and confirmation of efficacy and safety (Phase III) using an adaptive seamless design. This approach was used in a clinical study of indacaterol, a novel once-daily (od) inhaled long-acting beta(2)-adrenoreceptor agonist bronchodilator for the treatment of COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease).. The study comprised a dose-finding stage with dose selection after 14 days of treatment, and a second stage evaluating efficacy and safety during 26 weeks of treatment. The dose-finding stage included seven randomized treatment arms: double-blind indacaterol 75 microg, 150 microg, 300 microg or 600 microg od, the beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonist formoterol 12 microg twice-daily or placebo, or the anticholinergic tiotropium 18 microg od open-label. An independent data monitoring committee selected two indacaterol doses based on unblinded results of an interim analysis performed by an independent statistician. The sponsor, investigators and patients remained blinded to the results. The indacaterol doses were selected using pre-set efficacy criteria for trough (24-h post-dose) and early (1-4 h post-dose) bronchodilator effect after 14 days, and all safety data. To qualify for selection, the doses had to exceed a threshold for clinical relevance or be superior to either tiotropium or formoterol, whichever was the highest value. Selected doses were continued into the second, 26-week stage. The two other indacaterol doses not selected, and formoterol, were discontinued following dose selection.. 801 patients with moderate-to-severe COPD were evaluated. Indacaterol 150 microg was the lowest effective dose, exceeding criteria for trough FEV(1) (reference value 140 mL vs placebo) and FEV(1) AUC(1-4 h) (reference value 220 mL vs placebo). No safety signal was observed with any dose of indacaterol. Thus, indacaterol 150 and 300 microg were selected to continue into the second, 26-week stage.. The adaptive seamless design is a novel and efficient way to combine dose selection with efficacy evaluation and safety confirmation in a single trial.

Topics: Adult; Bronchodilator Agents; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Ethanolamines; Female; Formoterol Fumarate; Humans; Indans; Male; Middle Aged; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinolones; Research Design; Respiratory Function Tests; Scopolamine Derivatives; Severity of Illness Index; Tiotropium Bromide

Indacaterol is the first once-daily, long-acting inhaled beta(2)-agonist bronchodilator studied in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).. To demonstrate greater efficacy of indacaterol versus placebo on FEV(1) at 24 hours post dose (trough) after 12 weeks, to compare efficacy with placebo and tiotropium, and to evaluate safety and tolerability over 26 weeks.. Patients with moderate-to-severe COPD were randomized to double-blind indacaterol 150 or 300 microg or placebo, or open-label tiotropium 18 microg, all once daily, for 26 weeks. The primary efficacy outcome was trough FEV(1) at 12 weeks. Additional analyses (not adjusted for multiplicity) included transition dyspnea index (TDI), health status (St George's Respiratory Questionnaire [SGRQ]), and exacerbations. Serum potassium, blood glucose, and QTc interval were measured.. A total of 1,683 patients (age, 63.3 yr; post-bronchodilator FEV(1), 56% predicted; FEV(1)/FVC, 0.53) were randomized to the four treatment arms. Trough FEV(1) at Week 12 increased versus placebo by 180 ml with both indacaterol doses and by 140 ml with tiotropium (all P < 0.001 vs. placebo). At Week 26, for indacaterol 150/300 microg, respectively, versus placebo, TDI increased (1.00/1.18, P < 0.001) and SGRQ total score decreased (-3.3/-2.4, P < 0.01); corresponding results with tiotropium were 0.87 (P < 0.001) for TDI and (-1.0, P = not significant) for SGRQ total score. The incidence of adverse events, low serum potassium, high blood glucose, and prolonged QTc interval was similar across treatments.. Indacaterol was an effective once-daily bronchodilator and was at least as effective as tiotropium in improving clinical outcomes for patients with COPD. Clinical trial registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 00463567).

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Blood Glucose; Bronchodilator Agents; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Dyspnea; Electrocardiography; Female; Forced Expiratory Volume; Health Status; Humans; Indans; Male; Middle Aged; Potassium; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinolones; Scopolamine Derivatives; Spirometry; Tiotropium Bromide

Indacaterol is a novel, inhaled, once-daily, ultra-long-acting β2-agonist for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This randomized, double-blind study compared the bronchodilator efficacy of indacaterol with that of placebo and tiotropium in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD.. In an incomplete-block, multi-dose, three-period, crossover design, patients received three of the following four treatments: indacaterol 150 μg, indacaterol 300 μg, tiotropium 18 μg and placebo, each once-daily for 14 days. Each treatment period was separated by a 14-day washout. Study drug was supplied daily by blinded, third party study personnel to maintain blinding of patients and investigators. The primary efficacy variable was trough forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) at 24 h post-dose after 14 days. The study was powered to demonstrate non-inferiority of indacaterol to tiotropium for this variable.. A total of 169 patients were randomized (mean age 65 years); 153 (90.5%) completed. Trough FEV1 after 14 days with indacaterol 150 μg and 300 μg was statistically and clinically superior to placebo, with differences (95% CI) of 170 (120-220) and 150 (100-200) mL respectively (both p < 0.001). For this endpoint, both doses of indacaterol not only met the criterion for non-inferiority compared with tiotropium, but also achieved numerically higher values, with differences versus tiotropium of 40 and 30 mL for indacaterol 150 and 300 μg, respectively. At 5 min post-dose on Day 1, the mean FEV1 for both indacaterol doses was significantly higher than placebo (by 120 and 130 mL for indacaterol 150 and 300 μg, respectively; p < 0.001) and tiotropium (by 80 mL for both doses; p < 0.001). Adverse events were reported by similar proportions of patients: 31.4%, 29.5%, 28.3% and 28.5% for indacaterol 150 μg and 300 μg, tiotropium and placebo treatments, respectively.. Once-daily indacaterol provided clinically and statistically significant 24-h bronchodilation. Indacaterol was at least as effective as tiotropium, with a faster onset of action (within 5 min) on the first day of dosing. Indacaterol should prove useful in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD, for whom treatment with one or more classes of long-acting bronchodilator is recommended.. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00615459, EudraCT number: 2007-004071-19.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Aged; Bronchodilator Agents; Cross-Over Studies; Delayed-Action Preparations; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Indans; Male; Middle Aged; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinolones; Scopolamine Derivatives; Time Factors; Tiotropium Bromide

This dose-ranging study assessed the bronchodilator efficacy and tolerability of indacaterol, a novel once-daily inhaled beta2-agonist, in subjects clinically diagnosed with COPD. Comparative data with tiotropium were collected. In the double-blind, core period of the study, 635 subjects with COPD (prebronchodilator FEV(1)40% of predicted and > or =1.0L; FEV1/FVC <70%) were randomized to receive indacaterol 50, 100, 200 or 400microg or placebo via multi-dose dry powder inhaler, or indacaterol 400microg via single-dose dry powder inhaler, once daily for 7 days. After completing double-blind treatment and washout, a subset of subjects from each treatment group entered an open-label extension and received tiotropium 18microg once daily for 8 days. The primary efficacy variable was the trough bronchodilator effect: standardized area under the FEV1 curve between 22 and 24h post-dose (FEV1 AUC(22-24h)) on Day 1. Clinically relevant improvements versus placebo in FEV1 AUC(22-24h) were seen for 400 and 200microg doses on Day 1 and all doses on Day 7. All indacaterol doses significantly (P<0.05) increased FEV1 from 5min to 24h post-dose; the 400 and 200microg doses were most effective. All doses were well tolerated. Indacaterol trough FEV1 levels compared favorably with the improvement seen by Day 8 in subjects treated with tiotropium in the open-label extension. The results confirm that indacaterol has a 24-h duration of bronchodilator effect and a fast onset of action in COPD and suggest that indacaterol could be an effective once-daily inhaled beta2-agonist bronchodilator. Indacaterol demonstrated a good overall safety and tolerability profile.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adult; Aged; Bronchodilator Agents; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Female; Forced Expiratory Volume; Humans; Indans; Male; Middle Aged; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinolones; Scopolamine Derivatives; Tiotropium Bromide; Treatment Outcome

Long-acting beta-agonists (LABA) and long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA) combination therapy improved lung function and health-related quality-of-life and reduced exacerbation rates and dyspnea in symptomatic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. We compared the real-world effects of three fixed-dose LABA/LAMA combinations for COPD in Taiwan.. This multicenter, retrospective study evaluated 1-year outcomes after LABA/LAMA combination therapy in patients with symptomatic COPD. Exacerbations and symptoms of COPD, lung functions, and therapy escalation were compared among patients using tiotropium/olodaterol, umeclidinium/vilanterol and indacaterol/glycopyrronium. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to balance the baseline characteristics.. Data of 1,617 patients were collected. After PSM, time to first moderate-to-severe COPD exacerbation was comparable among three groups, while the annualized rates of the exacerbation (episodes/patient/year) in patients receiving tiotropium/olodaterol (0.19) or umeclidinium/vilanterol (0.17) were significantly lower than those receiving indacaterol/glycopyrronium (0.38). COPD-related symptoms were stable over the treatment period, and there was no significant difference in the changes of symptom scores including CAT and mMRC among three groups at the end of the study period.. This study presented valuable real-world outcome in terms of exacerbation and treatment response of COPD patients treated with fixed-dose LABA/LAMA regimens in Taiwan. The annualized rates of moderate-to-severe exacerbation in patients receiving tiotropium/olodaterol or umeclidinium/vilanterol were significantly lower than those receiving indacaterol/glycopyrronium, though the time to first moderate-to-severe exacerbation was similar among different fixed-dose LABA/LAMA combinations.

Topics: Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Benzoxazines; Benzyl Alcohols; Bronchodilator Agents; Chlorobenzenes; Drug Combinations; Glycopyrrolate; Humans; Indans; Muscarinic Antagonists; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinolones; Quinuclidines; Retrospective Studies; Taiwan; Tiotropium Bromide; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Bronchodilator Agents; Glycopyrrolate; Humans; Indans; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinolones; Tiotropium Bromide

Long-acting bronchodilators are the therapy with the best evidence for treating stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Long-acting combinations of β2 agonists and anticholinergics (LABA-LAMA) are recommended in advanced stages when monotherapy has not generated the desired effects. Pulmonary Rehabilitation (PR) is an effective non-pharmacological strategy. The aim of this study was to compare the results obtained in patients with COPD who received monotherapy versus dual bronchodilator therapy in terms of functional aerobic capacity, symptoms and quality of life.. Prospective non randomized intervention study; the patients were divided into two groups: in one group patients were treated with LAMA (Tiotropium Bromide, 5 μg every 24 h) and in the other group patients were treated with LABA + LAMA (Indacaterol/Glycopyrronium, 110/50 μg once a day). After receiving the concept of pulmonology, patients were intervened with 8 weeks of PR. The study was approved by the committee of the Clinica Neumológica del Pacifico in Cali and the Institución Universitaria Escuela Nacional del Deporte, Colombia. To determine the differences, t pair test for intragroup, and t-test was performed for intergroup analysis. For all tests, a p-value <0.05 was considered as statistically significant.. 53 patients participated in this study, of which 20 were assigned to the LAMA group and 33 to the LAMA + LABA group. Patients in both groups presented changes in the distance of the 6MWT, in the VO2e, dyspnea and in all the SGRQ domains. Regarding the comparison between groups, there were found no differences in the variables at the beginning of the PR and significant differences (p < 0.05) at the end of the 8 week-period in favor of the LABA + LAMA group, in symptoms with the mMRC scale, functional aerobic capacity with the 6 min walking test and in health related quality of life specifically in the symptoms domain, where the dual therapy group obtained better results.. The addition of LABA to the treatment with LAMA showed better response results compared with the monotherapy in patients with COPD who attended PR.

Topics: Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Bronchodilator Agents; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycopyrrolate; Humans; Indans; Male; Middle Aged; Muscarinic Antagonists; Prospective Studies; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinolones; Tiotropium Bromide

The concept of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) control has been proposed to guide treatment decisions in COPD. In this study, we aimed to validate the prospective value of this concept in the SPARK study population. Control was assessed based on COPD stability and impact. Patients with low impact and stability during weeks 1-12 were classified as controlled, and exacerbations were measured during a 52-week follow-up. Of the 2044 patients included a majority were non-controlled (80%), frequently due to high impact. During the follow-up, the rate of moderate/severe exacerbations was significantly lower in controlled patients (rate ratio, 0.56, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.65 p<0.0001) and time-to-first moderate/severe exacerbation was significantly delayed. This study demonstrated an association between control status and risk of exacerbations.

Topics: Aged; Bronchodilator Agents; Disease Progression; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycopyrrolate; Humans; Indans; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinolones; Reproducibility of Results; Respiratory Function Tests; Risk Assessment; Severity of Illness Index; Tiotropium Bromide; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Benzoxazines; Delayed-Action Preparations; Drug Combinations; Dry Powder Inhalers; Forced Expiratory Volume; Glycopyrrolate; Humans; Indans; Male; Muscarinic Antagonists; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinolones; Tiotropium Bromide; Vital Capacity

Although the prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) increases with age, no specific therapeutic approaches are available till date for the elderly population.. To assess the efficacy and safety of once-daily indacaterol 150 and 300 μg in elderly patients with moderate to severe COPD.. Data were pooled from 11 randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled studies (8445 patients with COPD). The patient population was stratified into age groups: young (≥40-<65 years; 52.3%), elderly (≥65-<75 years; 36.4%), and very elderly (≥75 years; 11.4%). The efficacy outcomes included improvements in trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV. At Week 12, the mean improvement in FEV. This pooled analysis suggests that the efficacy and safety of indacaterol treatment is similar between elderly and younger patients with COPD.

Topics: Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Bronchodilator Agents; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Double-Blind Method; Dyspnea; Female; Forced Expiratory Volume; Formoterol Fumarate; Health Status; Humans; Indans; Male; Middle Aged; Netherlands; Prevalence; Prospective Studies; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinolones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Salmeterol Xinafoate; Severity of Illness Index; Smoking; Tiotropium Bromide; Treatment Outcome; Vital Capacity

Tiotropium is a long acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA), licensed as triple therapy with inhaled corticosteroid and long-acting beta-agonist (ICS/LABA). There may be a synergistic benefit between LAMA and LABA as a consequence of receptor cross-talk, which in turn could modify beta-2 receptor downregulation and associated tolerance induced by LABA.. We hypothesize this mechanism may result in a reduction of airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) when using triple therapy.. We evaluated 14 non-smoking asthmatics using an open-label, randomized crossover design. ICS with Indacaterol and Tiotropium (IND/TIO) vs ICS with Indacaterol (IND) over 4 weeks with challenge performed after first and last doses at trough.. Our data suggest that concomitant tiotropium does not modify the bronchoprotective tolerance induced by Indacaterol, in turn suggesting that cross-talk may not be clinically relevant when using triple therapy. This study was registered on clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02039011.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Asthma; Biomarkers; Bronchial Hyperreactivity; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Indans; Male; Middle Aged; Muscarinic Antagonists; Quinolones; Respiratory Function Tests; Tiotropium Bromide; Treatment Outcome

Delivery of inhaled medications via an inhaler device underpins the effectiveness of treatment for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Correct inhaler technique among patients is also a predictor of achieving treatment compliance and adherence. Reporting of patient satisfaction with inhalers is therefore gaining increasing attention and is now recognized as an important patient-reported outcome in clinical trials involving patients with COPD or asthma. In this cross-sectional study, we use the validated Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ) to assess the handling and satisfaction for Respimat(®) Soft Mist™ Inhaler (SMI) compared with the Breezhaler(®) dry powder inhaler (DPI) among patients with COPD in Spain. Patients were already assigned to therapy with either SPIRIVA(®) (tiotropium) Respimat(®) or with Hirobriz(®)/Onbrez(®)/Oslif(®) (indacaterol) Breezhaler(®) for at least 3 but not more than 6 months before completing the PASAPQ at a single visit to the study site. The primary endpoint of the trial was the mean total PASAPQ score. Secondary endpoints were the performance score domain of the PASAPQ, the convenience score domain of the PASAPQ, and the overall satisfaction score of the PASAPQ. For the primary endpoint, the mean PASAPQ total score in the Respimat(®) and Breezhaler(®) groups was 80.7 and 79.9, respectively (difference of 0.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] -2.9 to 4.5; P=0.67). The mean total performance scores were 82.5 and 78.2 (difference of 4.3, 95% CI -0.3 to 8.9; P=0.06), and the mean total convenience scores were 78.6 and 81.9 (difference of -3.3, 95% CI -7.0 to 0.4; P=0.08) for the Respimat(®) and Breezhaler(®) groups, respectively. Patients gave the Respimat(®) SMI and the Breezhaler(®) DPI overall satisfaction PASAPQ scores of 6.0 and 5.9, respectively, which shows that patients were satisfied with these inhalers.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Aged; Bronchodilator Agents; Cross-Sectional Studies; Equipment Design; Female; Humans; Indans; Male; Middle Aged; Nebulizers and Vaporizers; Patient Preference; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinolones; Spain; Surveys and Questionnaires; Tiotropium Bromide

The need for a rapid onset of action and a long duration of the broncholytic effect is the likely reason for the development of new long-acting β2-agonists (LABAs) that are fast acting and have true 24 h duration of action. Indacaterol is the archetype of once-daily LABAs and already marketed as a maintenance therapy in patients with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).. Meta-analyses of published data or pooled analyses of primary data provide good insight into the clinical role of indacaterol in COPD.. The choice of the once-daily bronchodilator to start treatment in a patient with COPD mainly depends on the outcome of interest. Indacaterol is more effective than tiotropium if we consider symptoms or health-related quality of life as the primary outcome. Moreover, in symptomatic patient indacaterol should be preferred to tiotropium because of its rapid onset of action. By contrast, tiotropium appears to be more effective than indacaterol if exacerbations are the expected primary outcome. However, as indacaterol/glycopyrronium fixed-dose combination (QVA149) shows superior efficacy compared to glycopyrronium and tiotropium in patients with moderate to severe COPD, a fundamental question regarding the use of indacaterol that requires clarification is whether it is preferable to start immediately with QVA149 rather than using indacaterol alone.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Bronchodilator Agents; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Glycopyrrolate; Humans; Indans; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quality of Life; Quinolones; Scopolamine Derivatives; Tiotropium Bromide; Treatment Outcome

Inhaled bronchodilators, including long-acting muscarinic receptor antagonists (LAMA) and long-acting β2-adrenoreceptor agonists (LABA), are the mainstay of pharmacological treatment of stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Among approved LAMA, tiotropium bromide, glycopyrronium bromide, and umeclidinium bromide are administered once daily, whereas aclidinium bromide is administered every 12 h. New LAMA are under development for COPD. Among the approved LABA, indacaterol has a 24 h duration of action, whereas salmeterol and formoterol require twice-daily administration. New once-daily LABA, including vilanterol, olodaterol, milveterol, carmoterol, and abediterol, are in development. LAMA/LABA fixed dose combinations (FDCs) provide the convenience of two bronchodilators with different mechanism of action in a single inhaler. Indacaterol/glycopyrronium, umeclidinium/vilanterol, and olodaterol/tiotropium FDCs have been approved or are under approval and are likely to become a standard pharmacological strategy for COPD. Inhaled dual-pharmacology compounds, combining muscarinic antagonism and β2-agonism (MABA) in a single molecule, potentially provide additive or synergistic bronchodilation over either inhaled antimuscarinic or β2-agonist monotherapy.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Benzyl Alcohols; Bronchodilator Agents; Chlorobenzenes; Humans; Indans; Muscarinic Antagonists; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinolones; Scopolamine Derivatives; Structure-Activity Relationship; Tiotropium Bromide

INFLOW (INdacaterol eFfectiveness and utiLizatiOn in COPD: real World evaluation) was a prospective, noninterventional study assessing the effectiveness and safety of long-acting bronchodilators in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) from the Middle East, Asia, and South Africa.. Patients newly prescribed or switched to indacaterol or other long-acting β2-agonist (LABA), or tiotropium (monotherapy or in combination) were evaluated over 6 months. The primary endpoint was the clinical COPD questionnaire overall score at the end of the study.. Data were analyzed from 1,710 patients (mean postbronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second, 59% predicted) who received indacaterol (n=1,179), other LABA (n=68), tiotropium (n=271), indacaterol plus tiotropium (n=167), or other LABA plus tiotropium (n=25). Across treatments, clinical COPD questionnaire overall score improved from baseline by 0.81-1.26 points (all P<0.0001), 63%-84% of patients were satisfied/very satisfied, and physicians rated effectiveness as good/very good in 63%-80% of cases. The indacaterol inhaler was rated easy/very easy to use by the majority of patients, and physicians considered its use clearly understood by most patients. All treatments had acceptable tolerability.. In real life clinical practice across a diverse region, indacaterol and other long-acting bronchodilators improved health status and were well regarded by patients and physicians.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adult; Africa; Aged; Asia; Bronchodilator Agents; Delayed-Action Preparations; Drug Monitoring; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Indans; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinolones; Tiotropium Bromide; Treatment Outcome

Guidelines for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) recommend that treatment choices be based partly on symptoms.. A post-hoc analysis of pooled data from clinical studies compared the efficacy and safety of once-daily inhaled bronchodilators indacaterol (150 and 300 μg) and open-label tiotropium (18 μg) according to baseline dyspnoea severity on the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) scale in patients with COPD (mMRC scores <2 = 'less dyspnoea'; scores ≥2 = 'more dyspnoea'). Outcomes were assessed after 26 weeks.. The analysis included 3177 patients. In patients with less dyspnoea: indacaterol (both doses) improved 24-h post-dose ('trough') forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), transition dyspnoea index (TDI) and St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total scores at week 26 and reduced the risk of COPD exacerbations vs placebo; and open-label tiotropium improved trough FEV1 and TDI total score vs placebo at week 26. In patients with more dyspnoea: indacaterol (both doses) improved trough FEV1, TDI and SGRQ total scores at week 26; indacaterol 300 μg was the only treatment to improve the TDI total score by more than the minimum clinically important difference (≥1 point) vs placebo; and open-label tiotropium improved trough FEV1, TDI total score at week 26 and decreased the risk of COPD exacerbations vs placebo. In both subgroups, all treatments were well tolerated.. In patients with less dyspnoea, all treatments had similar effects. Indacaterol 300 μg may be a useful treatment option for patients with COPD who experience more severe breathlessness.

Topics: Bronchodilator Agents; Delayed-Action Preparations; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Dyspnea; Forced Expiratory Volume; Humans; Indans; Patient Acuity; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinolones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Scopolamine Derivatives; Tiotropium Bromide

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a chronic, progressive disease that is not curable. However, there are effective treatments available. In the UK, long-acting bronchodilators are first-line treatments for COPD patients requiring maintenance therapy, and there are several options available. The aim of this study is to establish, from the UK National Health Service (NHS) perspective, the cost-effectiveness profile of indacaterol, the first once-daily long-acting beta2-agonist (LABA), compared with tiotropium and salmeterol, in patients with moderate to severe COPD. In assessing the cost-effectiveness of COPD therapies, this study has the advantage of using real world evidence on the resource use associated with COPD management across the spectrum of the disease.. A Markov model was developed with four health states following the GOLD classification for severity of airflow limitation. The model time horizon was 3 years, and the cycle length was 3 months. From each state, patients could experience a severe or non-severe exacerbation, move to a different COPD state, remain in the current state or die. Transition probabilities were based on data from the indacaterol clinical trials. The majority of the resource use data was taken from the Optimum Patient Care Research Database (OPCRD), which contains data from over 20,000 COPD patients in England and Scotland. Cost data were taken from UK-based sources and published literature and presented for the cost year 2011. Health-related quality of life was the main outcome of interest and utility data for the COPD states were based on data from the indacaterol clinical trials and disutility due to exacerbations were taken from the literature. Both one way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to test the robustness of the results.. Indacaterol dominated in the comparison with salmeterol producing an incremental QALY gain of 0.008 and cost savings of £110 per patient over a 3-year time horizon. In the comparison with tiotropium over the same time horizon, indacaterol remained the dominant strategy, producing an incremental QALY gain of 0.008 and cost savings of £248 per patient. The one-way sensitivity analysis indicates that the proportion of patients in each of the COPD stages and the mortality rate associated with Very Severe COPD are the variables with the largest impact on the results. The probabilistic sensitivity analyses showed that over 72 % and 89 % of the iterations when compared with salmeterol and tiotropium, respectively, produced dominant results for indacaterol.. The analyses demonstrate that indacaterol dominates both tiotropium and salmeterol in the base case and is likely to remain cost-effective under a range of assumptions.

Topics: Aged; Albuterol; Bronchodilator Agents; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Costs; Female; Humans; Indans; Male; Markov Chains; Middle Aged; Models, Economic; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinolones; Salmeterol Xinafoate; Scopolamine Derivatives; Tiotropium Bromide; Treatment Outcome; United Kingdom

Topics: Bronchodilator Agents; Female; Humans; Indans; Male; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinolones; Scopolamine Derivatives; Tiotropium Bromide

Non-inferiority (NI) trials are becoming increasingly popular. The main purpose of NI trials is to assert the efficacy of a new treatment compared with an active control by demonstrating that the new treatment maintains a substantial fraction of the treatment effect of the control. Most of the statistical testing procedures in this area have been developed for three-arm NI trials in which a new treatment is compared with an active control in the presence of a placebo. However, NI trials frequently involve comparisons of several new treatments with a control, such as in studies involving different doses of a new drug or different combinations of several new drugs. In seeking an adequate testing procedure for such cases, we use a new approach that modifies existing testing procedures to cover circumstances in which several new treatments are present. We also give methods and algorithms to produce the optimal sample size configuration. In addition, we also discuss the advantages of using different margins for the assay sensitivity test between the active control and the placebo and the NI test between the new treatments and the active control. We illustrate the new approach by using data from a clinical trial.

Topics: Algorithms; Bronchodilator Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Indans; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinolones; Sample Size; Scopolamine Derivatives; Spirometry; Tiotropium Bromide

Topics: Adrenergic beta-Agonists; Bronchodilator Agents; Humans; Indans; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinolones; Scopolamine Derivatives; Tiotropium Bromide

As COPD patients commonly suffer cardio- and cerebrovascular (CCV) co-morbidities, our purpose was to establish the CCV safety profile of indacaterol, a novel, inhaled, long-acting β(2)-agonist for COPD.. The indacaterol clinical trial database comprised 4635 patients with moderate-to-severe COPD enrolled into studies of ≥6 months' duration treated with indacaterol, placebo or other bronchodilators (formoterol, salmeterol, tiotropium). Adverse events (AEs) were analysed overall and according to Anti-Platelet Trialists' Collaboration (APTC) criteria and baseline cardiovascular risk factors. A subset of patients had Holter monitoring.. Compared with placebo, indacaterol did not increase the risk of CCV AEs; relative risks were not significantly different for indacaterol versus other treatments. In all treatment groups, including placebo, most CCV AEs occurred in patients with pre-existing cardiovascular risk factors. The risk of APTC events (e.g. myocardial infarction, stroke, cardiovascular-related death) was not significantly increased for indacaterol versus placebo. The incidence of notable QTc interval increases >60 ms was low with all active treatments (0-0.5%, versus 0.3% with placebo). Holter monitoring in the subset of patients receiving indacaterol, tiotropium or placebo showed no clinically relevant effect of indacaterol or tiotropium relative to placebo on the development of arrhythmias. The number of deaths adjusted for exposure was lower with all active treatments than with placebo, with a trend to reduced risk with indacaterol (relative risk 0.30, p = 0.054).. The overall CCV safety profile of indacaterol was similar to placebo and comparable with other long-acting bronchodilators, providing reassurance for regular long-term use of indacaterol in COPD. Data for this analysis were pooled from three studies, registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as: NCT00393458, NCT00463567 and NCT00567996.

Topics: Adult; Albuterol; Bronchodilator Agents; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cerebrovascular Disorders; Ethanolamines; Female; Forced Expiratory Volume; Formoterol Fumarate; Humans; Indans; Male; Middle Aged; Placebos; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinolones; Risk Factors; Salmeterol Xinafoate; Scopolamine Derivatives; Smoking; Tiotropium Bromide

Indacaterol is a novel inhaled once-daily long-acting beta(2)-agonist (LABA) for the maintenance treatment of COPD that has been compared to existing inhaled monotherapies on a number of symptomatic endpoints in clinical studies. With constrained healthcare budgets, the objective of this analysis was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of indacaterol 150 μg, the approved starting dose for maintenance therapy, from a German heath service perspective against the most widely used bronchodilator tiotropium, and the twice-daily LABA, salmeterol.. A Markov model was developed with the following main health states: Mild, Moderate, Severe, and Very Severe COPD, based on pre-bronchodilator FEV(1) measures reported in the indacaterol clinical trials, and death. Each disease severity health state had two associated health states for severe or non-severe exacerbation. The model considered patients with moderate to severe COPD, with a mean age of 64 years. The base case time horizon was three years, with discounting set at 3% for costs and benefits. Selected clinical inputs and health state utilities were derived from indacaterol clinical trials, while costs were based on publicly available drug prices and tariffs or published sources. Inputs describing disease progression were based on published data on the rate of FEV(1) decline.. Point-estimates show that indacaterol 150 μg is dominant (lower total costs and better outcomes) against tiotropium and salmeterol. An alternative analysis comparing indacaterol 300 μg (maximum dose) against tiotropium, showed an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of approximately €28,300 per QALY.. Indacaterol is cost-effective compared to tiotropium and salmeterol.

Topics: Albuterol; Bronchodilator Agents; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Female; Forced Expiratory Volume; Germany; Humans; Indans; Male; Markov Chains; Middle Aged; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quinolones; Salmeterol Xinafoate; Scopolamine Derivatives; Survival Analysis; Tiotropium Bromide; Treatment Outcome